gears.jpg
Gears of Pajiba: The Apocalypse

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Daniel Carlson

Trade News | March 22, 2007 | Comments (44)


This has been a bad week.

I won’t even try to sugar-coat things for all you readers out in Pajibaland: This has just been a bad week. I’ll admit I’m more resilient than most when it comes to letting the brain-eroding sludge that often flows through Hollywood like a river of Satan’s own vomit roll right on past me while I keep my eyes focused on the few bright spots on the horizon that guide us from day to day and film to film. For every 300, there’s a Waitress, dig? I live in L.A. and work in a facet of The Industry, so I’m used to the fact that most producers ran out of original ideas long, long ago, if they ever had one. But this week, it’s like the only news coming out of my sweet, screwed-up burg was remake after adaptation after remake after adaptation after somebody please kill me. Columbia Pictures bought the rights to The Green Hornet, but really, who cares? Who created enough buzz to make Columbia think there’s a film future in a franchise based on a radio serial? Did no one see The Shadow? What’s going on?

But even that pales in comparison with the ultimate sadness: New Line Cinema will be adapting the Xbox 360 shooter Gears of War into what will inevitably be a godawful soul-raping suckfest of a movie. The video game lets the player roam around the planet and kill giant bugs that periodically erupt from beneath the surface (which, on my friend’s 42-inch plasma, is a damn eerie thing to see), but a film will have to somehow staple a stupid plot onto a one-note story that’s designed just to get you playing. Has there ever been a good movie based on a video game? Ever? Stuart Beattie, the scribe who has helped birth the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy and should really be made to pay for that, has been tapped to adapt the project for the screen, so expect Gears of War to have a lot of stunning set-pieces, clunky dialogue, and repressed homoeroticism. I can’t wait.

What else, what else … oh yeah: Who wants to see Elisha Cuthbert get raped? You do? And you, sir? Well, step right up, because it’s your (un)lucky day. Those of you not in L.A. or New York might not have seen the controversial ads for Captivity that have since been taken down, so let me catch you up: Following a public outcry over the depravity of the ads for the upcoming torture-porn flick Captivity, producers After Dark Films agreed to take the ads down by 2 p.m. the other day, March 20. The horrible ads in question show Cuthbert progressing through a series of four frames — Abduction, Confinement, Torture, Termination — that serve to degrade not just Cuthbert but everyone who actually sees the ad. After Dark CEO Courtney Solomon, shoveling more crap than George Bush on a good day, claimed 1) that the ads were accidentally put up and never meant to be greenlighted, and 2) that the torture-porn film about a woman being kidnapped by a killer is actually “about female empowerment.” Yeah. Because billboards just put themselves up all the time, and Saw is about the triumph of the human spirit.

So I’m holding out hope that things will get better. I saw the trailer recently for Mike White’s Year of the Dog, and while it feels in part like a Wes Anderson rip-off — the formal compositions, the Cat Stevens soundtrack — it still looks like a cute and somewhat intelligent diversion from, well, pretty much everything else. Take a look:

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Dude, You Like So Totally Can't Go Home Again | I Don't Give a Flying Pajiba





Comments

I particularly like the 'Kut n Go' ad beneath the Captivity poster.

Posted by: WandringSoul at March 22, 2007 6:04 AM

I love how they throw around "female empowerment" over everything like this...bullshit.

And gears of war...just *sigh.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at March 22, 2007 6:43 AM

Why the hate for Pirates of the Carribean?

I've seen the phrase female empowerment bandied about in reference to everything from The Pussycat Dolls to Paris Hilton. I'm pretty sure the modern day definition of "female empowerment" was conceived by a man.

Posted by: Tenzil at March 22, 2007 7:47 AM

Yep it's official HOLLY-FUCKING-WOOD SUCKS.

Big time.

Where are the ideas y'all???

Posted by: Jean at March 22, 2007 8:40 AM

Did no one learn from Doom?

Next there will be a torture porn Xbox game (Catch the virgins! See how many fingers you can cut off before the clock strikes twelve! Identify the spilled guts!) and then they'll make it into a movie called Body Partz or something equally puerile and it'll be a big hit with the kiddies.

And the dog movie? If it looks like a dog, sounds like a dog, smells like a dog... sigh.

Posted by: JH Maximumm at March 22, 2007 9:05 AM

I ain't gonna lie - Resident Evil is a guilty pleasure of mine. I'm sorry. No... I'm not.

Ohhh... I get it - she gets kidnapped and beat up and tortured and then somehow escapes? I'm guessing with the aid of a somewhat rugged, handsome man? Yeah, that IS empowering. It's just like a mirror of society, even.

Fucking kill yourself.

Posted by: TK at March 22, 2007 9:07 AM

What about Silent Hill? It hit everything it was supposed to and still was a good movie. The only one I can think of though.

But let's not forget about BloodRayne. The montage at the end alone makes it the best movie of all time

Posted by: Apricots at March 22, 2007 9:31 AM

Apricots... saw Bloodrayne... on purpose?

Why? Why would you do such a thing to yourself and those you love?

Silent Hill - I thought the cinematography, mood, atmosphere, whatever, was amazing. I thought the monsters were cool as hell. I love Sean Bean. I thought the plot and acting sucked, though.

Posted by: TK at March 22, 2007 10:02 AM

Year of the dog...Hmm, OK. A little cute for my tastes, but might feel a bit like Happiness, or Storytelling.
Much rather see that than poor Elisha's exploitation flick. As little as I liked Paris Hilton and kinda tho Cuthbert was hot, I didn't want to see an obviously crappy HOUSE OF WAX (Isn't that vernacular for a film studio?), even to see Hilton get axed...

So - Eugh! You know what I mean?

Rather watch Uwe Boll in that boxing match than Bloodrayne. The trailer alone made me finish off my ibuprofen bottle.

Posted by: Damien Walder at March 22, 2007 10:29 AM

Is it just me, or do the stages used in the ads for Captivity deliberately evoke the BTK Killer (bind, torture, kill)? Because I think the only way the whole thing could be tackier would be if it was actually based on a real-life killer and real-life victims.

On an entirely different note, I don't care if Year of the Dog is sappy, I'd see anything with Laura Dern, Molly Shannon, Peter Sarsgaard, John C. Reilly, and Regina King in the cast.

Posted by: Tim at March 22, 2007 10:43 AM

The suckiness of video game movies has nothing to do with some inherent problem with trying to make a movie out of a video game and everything to do with talentless hacks.

'Gears of War' is a fairly cinematic game as it is. It could be a fun little brainless movie with lots of cool cinematics. Hell, I haven't stopped thinking about the Hammer of Dawn since I saw it in action.

Of course, like you said, some idiot will feel the need to tack on a romance or some other crap and completely destroy the fun.

At least with Uwe Boll, the level of suck is guaranteed.

Posted by: twig at March 22, 2007 10:57 AM

"Next there will be a torture porn Xbox game (Catch the virgins! See how many fingers you can cut off before the clock strikes twelve! Identify the spilled guts!) and then they'll make it into a movie called Body Partz or something..."

Posted by: JH Maximumm at March 22, 2007 9:05 AM

SHUT UP!! you just know some dumbass wannabe producer reads Pajiba for inspiration, and he just read that post and thought "GOLD!", and ran as quickly as he could to Eli Roth, who then offered Antonella Barba (for her breakthrough role, naturally) the lead role of the virgin cocktease who becomes determined to end the psycho's reign of terror after her friend and fellow-virgin gets tragically murdered by the psycho...The psycho to be played by something from WWE or WWF or whatever it's called these days.

Posted by: KDM at March 22, 2007 11:07 AM

Eventhough I spent most of last night watching SVU reruns, I still don't know this. What class felony is soul-raping?

Posted by: Brian at March 22, 2007 11:18 AM

I think the torture porn game was already released, although it was on PS2. Look up Manhunt by (of course) Rockstar, the people behind Grand Theft Auto.

Posted by: Vermillion at March 22, 2007 11:24 AM

Good point, KDM.

You don't suppose said dumbass wannabe producer would give me a cut of the profits, do you? I don't even own an Xbox...

Posted by: JH Maximumm at March 22, 2007 11:33 AM

Year of the Dog looks alright. You were dead on about the Wes Anderson lite. But with John C. Reilly and Peter Sarsgaard, what's not to love?

Also, was that Ludicrous in it?

Posted by: Chris W at March 22, 2007 11:33 AM

Bad video game adaptation and homoeroticism you say?

Sounds like Vin Diesel's next project.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 22, 2007 11:35 AM

We may disagree on the film (I rather liked it), but of all the examples of Hollywood crap you could have picked, you went with 300? Norbit and the Covenant say hi.

Posted by: bartap at March 22, 2007 11:37 AM

Silent Hill was an incredible piece of shit. When people say they liked it I ask them "what happened in it?" they never know, the story was too retarded to care to remember.

Posted by: uh at March 22, 2007 12:06 PM

Man do I love me some Peter Saarsgard. Just soemthing about him and his accent that gets me hot. I will see this movie just 'cause he's in it.

....Aw shit! I just watched the trailer and realised his romantic lead is Shoddy Mannon er, I mean Molly Shannon. Oh well perhaps my Saarsgard love will overcome my antipathy for Shannon.

Posted by: rose no thorns at March 22, 2007 12:47 PM

I've played Gears of War at my cousins house, with the rattle your nuts sound system and tv so big it has God in the picture in picture. It actually would lend itself to the kind of Bay/Bruckheimer type of action flick I can appreciate. It would need someone with a darker directorial style though.

I'm all for mindless entertainment when it doesn't pretend to be anything but, as long as they don't tack on some half assed love angle to make the lead character "relateable". It's a movie about soldiers jacked up on steroids shoving chainsaws into the chests of alien invaders: That's not the kind of guy who's sensitive side I would even WANT to see. Yeah, I can totally see them casting Vin "No Neck" Diesel for this one.

I also think Silent Hill is probably, to date, the best movie based on a game. The original Resident Evil is a close second.

Posted by: Manny at March 22, 2007 12:59 PM

I know it's wrong but I will *always* be able to watch Mortal Kombat. But MKII was a horrendous piece of crap from the very first frame.

Posted by: hoorah at March 22, 2007 2:47 PM

Maybe Captivity is about female empowerment because Cuthbert gets tortured and murdered for setting unrealistic beatuy standards for women of all ages. And the twist is that the torturer/murderer is a woman, and a hot(t) one! Then they can do some lesbian torture porn homoeroticism!
Why not go to the absolute depths exploitation?

Posted by: whodatninja? at March 22, 2007 3:40 PM

Torture Porn in Video Games?! That will never happen, if the video gaming industry knows what's good for it!

Or if it can forget Manhunt!

Or Night Trap!

Or 177, in Japan!

Or Custer's Revenge!

Folks, take a look at J-list.com. Depravity in Video Games is something the Japanese have perfected. As far as Video Game movies... Who knows? Gears of War might be fun, but I'll only catch 4 seconds at a time.

Gotta take cover from the sets in front, after all.

-Jon.

Posted by: Jon F. at March 22, 2007 4:15 PM

"Has there ever been a good movie based on a video game? Ever?"
There could be if someone would make a movie (or movies) of the Gabriel Knight series, if PC adventure games count. Those games are already fairly cinematic as it is; the second game in the series was even done as full motion video with live actors and all. I don't see why people don't make movies out of adventure games if they must make a movie out of a game; they already come with plots and characters and everything. Oh, wait, the people making movies don't care about that stuff, anyway. *Sigh*
/rant

Posted by: Kris at March 22, 2007 5:29 PM

HELLOOOO!!!!! MORTAL KOMBAT ANYONE?!?!?!?!?!

Posted by: Mathew at March 22, 2007 5:51 PM

ok, i may get completely murdered for this...but i really don't think the billboard for captivity is that bad (with PERHAPS the exception of the second last torture still)...i think saw was way more disgusting with the severed body parts.

the only thing that upsets me about the whole captivity poster scandal (and excuse my language) is that some carpet licking whore had the audacity to call kidnap, rape, and torture empowering.

Posted by: cris at March 22, 2007 6:07 PM

Wow. I can't believe I'm actually reading a review about another one of societies sick media creations that actually contains some nod to moral outcry over its existence!

Yet still, the verbs I heard used to describe the film were: "tacky" and "exploitative." Keep trying you guys! The American public is this much closer to actually expressing some semblance of REAL outrage over sickness like this!! :-)

Posted by: A person who still has a soul [!] at March 22, 2007 6:10 PM

"godawful soul-raping suckfest of a movie" shall now be part of my movie-going vocabulary. Right up there with "sweaty piece of turd" (Jon Stewart).
Year of the Dog looks not half bad, actually, so thanks for that clip!

Posted by: tira at March 22, 2007 6:42 PM

I think Dan's comments on the torture movie reflect a cataclysmic collission of knee-jerk, liberal, political correctness and over-protective, religious-right kookiness. Deliverance gets nominated of Academy Awards over 30 years ago, but today we collectively convince ourselves we are supposed to be outraged by this bit off movie fluff. Let me see: Elisha Cuthbert tortured and gagged on the first season 24 = great television. Elisha getting tortured on big screen = bad, bad, evil Hollywood. I guess torture and rape is only okay if Tarantino does it and it involves a man (i.e. Pulp Fiction). Get over yourself Daniel

Posted by: JP at March 22, 2007 7:49 PM

I'm actually a member of the religious left. Just wanted to get that on record. Thanks.

Posted by: Daniel Carlson at March 22, 2007 8:44 PM

While I do respect how some really despise the film, I think Tomb Raider is an almost spot-on adaptation of the game. I enjoyed both the game and the movie.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 22, 2007 8:48 PM

I too get really pissed off when I see the term "female empowerment" used as a cover for things that are stupid, insulting, sexist, distasteful, gross and/or horrid.

However, this has been going on for YEARS!!!! Have any of you ever looked at women's fashion?? Or sat around and listened to women talk, especially in high school and college, when they convince themselves it's cool and smart to be slutty? Mr. Head-up-his-ass at After Dark finally said in a public forum what a lot of women have convinced themselves of for years: anything offensive or against mainstream taste that involves women is "female empowerment" and therefore above reproach.

And yes, I am female, and I work as an electrical engineer, so I realize I've been given opportunities much broader than what my grandmother had. But anything done in the name of "female empowerment" since at least the mid-80s has been complete crap. 90% of the shit I've taken from other people about my career choices or my personal tastes (I like heavy metal music and action movies and martial arts and hate chick flicks) has come from other women.


And on a more pleasant side note, I also thought the original Mortal Kombat movie was pretty good. Cheesy in parts, but overall a good movie. I haven't played Gears of War, but I was always under the impression it didn't have a plot, it was strictly a shoot-em-up game???

Posted by: Camille at March 22, 2007 10:53 PM

I also thought Tomb Raider and Mortal Kombat were pretty good video game movie adaptations. Of course, in a world that contains Super Mario Brothers, Street Fighter, and Bloodrayne, the bar is pretty low.

Posted by: Vermillion at March 22, 2007 10:59 PM

Camille, Gears of War has your basic 'man vs. hive mind' plot plus your 'armageddon' plot plus your 'disgraced soldier does good' plot plus your 'we want this to be a trilogy so there's vague waving of hands' plot plus your 'the government is always business and the business is always evil' plot.

Any one of those could be good for a two hour joyride, as long as they don't tack on 'cute girl needs help' or 'ex-soldier love interest needs help' or 'random screaming blonde needs help'.

.... and Kris, I don't know if you were being sarcastic or what but I'm pretty sure Uwe Boll's grand abomination "Alone in the Dark" was 'inspired' by the Gabriel Knight games. So no, I guess you're right, nobody's made a serious attempt to make a GK movie.

Posted by: twig at March 23, 2007 8:56 AM

twig, I thought Alone in the Dark was it's own game series, separate from GK. And the games were more influenced by Lovecraft than anything. OF course, I hadn't seen the movie, so for all I know, you could be right, which would explain why it was so bad: he adapted the wrong game!

Posted by: Vermillion at March 23, 2007 9:50 AM

I left a comment to this yesterday but it didn't show up. Dammit.

Anyway, it went something along the lines of:

Let's not forget, Mike White made a couple of really good movies before he started doing nothing but Jack Black Vehicles. Although his previous attempts at working with Molly Shannon have turned out rather disastrously... She seems to be somewhat likable and not at all abrasive, judging from this trailer.

And also fuck that, Wes Anderson is nothing but a Hal Ashby rip off himself (kidding.... sortof) so let's give Mike the benefit of the doubt before we start making comparisons.

Posted by: litelysalted at March 23, 2007 10:29 AM

Vermillion, I stand corrected, you're right.

Of course, this only means Uwe Boll still has the chance to 'film' a GK game, so nobody wins. : * (

Posted by: twig at March 23, 2007 12:04 PM

I'm not a big video game player, but I loved Star Wars: The Knights of the Old Republic. The plot is definitely big-screen worthy if they decide they want to make a Star Wars pre-pre-quel.

Posted by: bartap at March 23, 2007 12:36 PM

Twig, Vermillion et al -

Am I the only one who has entered this new phase of Uwe Boll-interest where now I'm actually half-heartedly curious to see how far he'll go with his badness--now with Jason Statham goodness? I could be the only film geek who doesn't want the man's head on a platter...I've only seen one film of his (BR) but at this point I'm starting to get trainwreck-fascinated.

Wait--was this what he planned all along? &%$@!

Posted by: ranylt at March 23, 2007 1:03 PM

Yup, ranylt, you got played. Bummer.

Posted by: TK at March 23, 2007 3:42 PM

Le fromage demeure seul...

Posted by: ranylt at March 23, 2007 3:57 PM

Not only did he play you, ranyIt, but he got a tax break for it.

Way to go.

Posted by: Vermillion at March 23, 2007 11:07 PM

Ditto on what other folks have said about the ridiculous idea that torture porn (or whatnot) is empowering.

Camille, you might want to check out the book _Female Chauvinist Pigs_ which addresses some of what you've described.

Posted by: alarmjaguar at March 24, 2007 10:54 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.