web
counter
 

Why Don't We Just Wait Here For A Little While... See What Happens

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (14)



Thumbnail image for 1286208652.jpg

I’m going to try to stop bitching about The Thing, the reborquel that’s coming out next year. Yes, I know it’s not a remake; it’s meant to take place prior to the events of John Carpenter’s 1982 masterpiece (and it is a goddamn masterpiece). If anything, it’s a remake of the 1951 film The Thing From Another World, though that’s not quite right either. Regardless, I’ve given the film a ration of shit, mainly because I don’t like my Carpenter canon fucked with. But it’s happening, and so that’s that. Honestly? It would annoy me less if they’d just change the title a bit. If it’s not a remake, why call it The Thing?

Things like that annoy the hell out of me.

Anyway.

It’s being directed by first-timer Matthijs van Heijningen, Jr. and stars Joel Edgerton and Mary Elizabeth Winstead. I like Winstead, but one of the things I always liked about Carpenter’s film was the lack of a romantic subplot. But that’s a rare find these days — there’s gotta be some romance! Ugh. The question will be whether or not Heijningen will be able to hit the same levels of tension and freakishness that Carpenter did. Because the film will inevitably be compared to Carpenter’s film (another pitfall stemming from using the same name — did I mention that annoys me?), and Carpenter’s film was a pretty damn intense experience. The paranoia, the fear, and the suffocating panic of the characters was palpable throughout the film.

Regardless, we’ve got the first new images from the film, and it looks… well, based solely on the images, they’ve got the look down pretty well. No one is too clean-looking. It looks cold as a motherfucker. And they’ve got flamethrowers. So, you know, there’s that.

Take a look:
1286208579.jpg

1286208590.jpg

1286208603.jpg
(yes, that’s the kid from Fired Up!)

1286208641.jpg

1286208652.jpg

(source: Film School Rejects)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Things You Don't Need to Bother Your Pretty Little Head With Part XXVII | Paranormal Activity 2 Trailer | Everything You Need to Know About Last Night's "Chuck" in 9 Lackluster Screen Grabs









Comments

What was it another critic said the other day online? I don't think there's an instrument in existence strong enough to measure the faintness of my interest in this project.

"Reborquel." LOVE!

Posted by: Ranylt at October 5, 2010 9:29 AM

All it needs is the ghost of James Arness, because if you've got flamethrowers, you've got gunsmoke.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 5, 2010 9:31 AM

So they got this monstrosity coming out and then "At the Mountains of Madness" following that up?

Guess Hollywood is doubling-down on their Antartica/interstellar monster movies.

Posted by: Fredo at October 5, 2010 10:09 AM

Anybody who gets their hopes up is going to be pretty fucking pissed when AvP shows up with lasers.

Posted by: admin at October 5, 2010 10:13 AM

I'm with you in the love for the thing. Definitely a masterpiece and a very important movie to me in my formative years (don't know if that says anything).

I hate the idea of this remake-ish thing. But, that first picture looks like Mr. Eko is gonna be in this movie. A Mr. Eko-Thing seems like a terrifying thing to have to kill. So, maybe there is hope? (I'm gonna hate myself for talking myself into seeing this opening night)

Posted by: Josh at October 5, 2010 10:29 AM

I always wondered what the hell they were doing with flame throwers at the pole. Did they just have them lying around in case aliens showed up? Who does that? (Other than Skitz, I mean.) Otherwise, what did they intend to do with them, light their ciggies? Toast a few penguins for the fun of it? Extreme hot foot?

Posted by: , at October 5, 2010 10:49 AM

Please for god’s sake! Nooooooooooooooooooo! Don’t destroy the original. I remember watching this as a kid, being shot in black and white gave it a scary feel. Hey the black guy, isn’t the Adebisi from “Oz?”

Posted by: Pookie at October 5, 2010 11:12 AM

*yawn* Next...

Posted by: litmus0001 at October 5, 2010 11:24 AM

Haven't watched The Thing in a little while, but wasn't the other team of scientists from some non-English speaking, European country? The team that discovered the alien craft, and cut out the block of ice that something was trapped in?

Shouldn't that factor into this prequel?

Am I seeking common sense where none exists?

Posted by: malikvlc at October 5, 2010 12:58 PM

I always wondered what the hell they were doing with flame throwers at the pole. Did they just have them lying around in case aliens showed up? Who does that? (Other than Skitz, I mean.) Otherwise, what did they intend to do with them, light their ciggies? Toast a few penguins for the fun of it? Extreme hot foot?

I figured they would be used for any number of things in the middle of an ice desert. They might need them from time to time to melt down excess snow and ice that builds up around the base for instance. I wonder if actual artic research stations have them?

Posted by: Bry at October 5, 2010 1:04 PM

Malikvlc: Yes, they were Norwegian.

Posted by: Ranylt at October 5, 2010 1:34 PM

So...is the end of this movie going to be the dog running? With the dude's in the helicopter trying to shoot it?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at October 5, 2010 2:45 PM

My money is still on this being no good. The existential horror of Carpenter's film is unique - even Carpenter has never managed to replicate it. I suspect they'll get the details - which can be copied - right, and the overall vibe completely wrong.

But it won't damage Carpenter's film, just as the AvP films have only made Alien look better.

Posted by: Paul B at October 5, 2010 4:27 PM

Fuck Joel Edgerton. Motherfucker played the young version of Uncle Owen and never once mentioned etiquette or protocol. He literally scored 0% on the Uncle Owen Scale. And yes I'm totally comfortable blaming him and not the dippy git who 'wrote' the script.

Mary Elizabeth Winstead, on the other hand, I am totally OK with. In my mind she's perpetually walking through doorway with venetian blinds over a window with my name written on it backwards while I soliloquise about whether those getaway sticks do indeed go "all the way up".

Posted by: Jim at October 7, 2010 5:06 AM