web
counter
 

Fantastic Four Franchise Gets the Reboot, and We Get the Ass Boot

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (25)



Rise_of_the_Silve.jpg

It’s only been one day since it was announced that Disney would buy Marvel Entertainment, but today, we’re seeing the very first consequence of the sale. And it’s not pretty.

See, in some instances, certain studios already have the rights to certain Marvel properties, and they maintain the rights in perpetuity so long as they continue making those movies. 20th Century Fox, for instances, owns the rights to the Fantastic Four franchise, which has seen two movies in recent years, arguably two of the very worst comic book movies of all time. But they have been profitable — they’ve made about $600 million worldwide (on $230 million production budgets). So what does a studio do to ensure it doesn’t lose the rights to a profitable, though fairly unpopular comic-book franchise?

It reboots it. Indeed, Fox is now in the process of rebooting The Fantastic Four franchise. The studio has hired Akiva Goldsman to oversee the overhaul. Michael Green, executive producer of “Heroes” has also been hired to pen the script; Green is also writing the script for Ryan Reynolds’ Green Lantern movie (no relation).

This probably won’t be the only such reboot. Fox also owns the rights to Daredevil (yay! Blind superhero movie!) and, of course, X-Men, which means those movies will continue to be releases yearly for the next 30 years.

Columbia Pictures, likewise, owns the right to Spiderman, and though a fourth movie is already in development, Columbia has already hired a writer to write fifth and sixth movies, which are also expected to be reboots, working with a different cast and director, as few expect Sam Raimi and Tobey Maguire will be back for a fifth movie.

All of which is to say: Whether we want them or not, the release schedule over the next decade will probably be dominated by Marvel Entertainment characters. Not only will we see all those Avengers movies, but Disney is certainly going to want to capitalize on their $4 billion investment, while various other studios will want to keep their agreements with Marvel intact.










Mad Men "My Old Kentucky Home" Review | Swamp Thing News













Comments

It's not a 'reboot' if the original movie was good, goddamn it. You can't have a Spider-Man reboot since the originals were good/made money. It's just an unnecessary and stupid remake.

Unless we're 'rebooting' it in order to make it shittier. Hell, it is Hollywood.

(On that vein, who knows if the F4 can be a 'reboot,' since they were shitty but inexplicably successful. Daredevil, though? Reboot. Big ol' boot.

Posted by: twig at September 1, 2009 9:32 AM

Hey, maybe it'll shame/terrify Warner into giving me more Superman. I'm okay with it. Maybe Fox can finally take Jackson Publick's idea of doing FF as a period piece. People love that "Mad Men"! They've figured out The Silver Age is great. Go!

Posted by: Jay at September 1, 2009 9:34 AM

Michael Green, executive producer of “Heroes” has also been hired to pen the script; Green is also writing the script for Ryan Reynolds’ Green Lantern movie (no relation).

I just threw up in my mouth. And not just a little.


Posted by: ed newman at September 1, 2009 9:42 AM

How many movies have to be made from the same set of source material before we figure out that maybe some source material doesn't make good movies? I mean, I know people love the comic books and tend to do the "But with the perfect cast and an excellent writer and a time machine to make sure we can get all of them at the same time it'll be great!" thing, but after a certain amount of crap is sucked out of a franchise like Fantastic 4 maybe we should just accept that there IS nothing but crap to be mined there. I doubt Disney could to a better job with it but hell, why not let them figure that out. (Also; there were two movies? I just remember the one. And that's only because Chris Evans was in it.)

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at September 1, 2009 9:43 AM

Can we please move the word "reboot" to a list of words never to be used again?
The world is ending if people are redoing movies that came out 3 years ago.
Hollywood has officially hit rock bottom.
Its only a matter of time before Oscar has a cateogry for "Best Reboot" and we can all gouge our eyes out with ice picks.

Posted by: Todd at September 1, 2009 9:44 AM

A Desolation Jones movie would be nice.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

Posted by: Jay at September 1, 2009 9:46 AM

The problem, I think, is that instead of writing new stories for the films, they just reconfigure old stories. Except they screw with the old stories assuming the average moviegoer won't know enough to care and that the fanboys will get over their outrage. The Fantastic Four is a really simple concept: A family of superheroes explores the universe. Use that as the starting point and go nuts.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at September 1, 2009 9:48 AM

"the Fantastic Four franchise, which has seen two movies in recent years, arguably two of the very worst comic book movies of all time. "

Clearly spoken like a man who has never seen Ghost Rider or Elektra. Or LXM. Or Wolverine.

Christ.

If you'll excuse me, I'm off to work on my plans for exploding zombies, who I will then direct towards Hollywood.

Posted by: TK at September 1, 2009 9:53 AM

Wolverine was bad, but at least it had a couple entertaining parts. Fantastic Four (either of them)? Not so much.

Honestly, I don't mind the Disney takeover... I don't see them doing any worse a job. There will still be crappy Marvel movies and there will still be awesome Marvel movies. So what's really changing? Nothing really...

Posted by: Colin at September 1, 2009 9:57 AM

The problem, I think, is that instead of writing new stories for the films, they just reconfigure old stories. ... The Fantastic Four is a really simple concept: A family of superheroes explores the universe. Use that as the starting point and go nuts.

Yeah, OK, but writing new stories is both actual work, and perceived to be more risky. The story from the last movie is at least *known* crap, with a certain comfort in familiarity.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 9:57 AM

The problem, I think, is that instead of writing new stories for the films, they just reconfigure old stories. ... The Fantastic Four is a really simple concept: A family of superheroes explores the universe. Use that as the starting point and go nuts.

Yeah, OK, but writing new stories is both actual work, and perceived to be more risky. The story from the last movie is at least known crap, with a certain comfort in familiarity.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 9:58 AM

The problem, I think, is that instead of writing new stories for the films, they just reconfigure old stories.

The problem is they don't actually look at what made the stories they're trying to ape successful and popular. "Oh what, Jean was some sort of evil space Pheonix thing... whatever."

Instead of actually looking at what it is they're trying to do (or just getting Warren Ellis to write it), they glance at the covers, wave their hands a bit, pretend Jessica Alba can act, and ship it off.

Just look at League of Extordinary Gentlemen. Everything that has ever been done badly in comic book movies, writ large.

Posted by: twig at September 1, 2009 10:30 AM

I'm not too upset about a FF reboot, they can't possibly make it worse. (That's not a dare, Hollywood! fuckwits.)

Actually all the above mentioned terrible movies could use a re-make. I, for one, am sure that X-men 3 didn't happen except in my darkest nightmares (my subconscious is obviously so fucked up, it'd make Freud squee (I dare you to imagine Freud squeeing and not squee your pants a little)).

Posted by: Joker at September 1, 2009 10:46 AM

Don't badmouth Daredevil, Rowles. Just because the movie was shit, doesn't mean the character is.

Posted by: henchman for hire at September 1, 2009 10:48 AM

Amen, Henchman. Daredevil remaims one of my all-time favorite comic book heroes. A dark-as-hell, complex, Batman-esque character, without the trust fund.

Posted by: TK at September 1, 2009 10:54 AM

Speaking of...

Where's Dick Grayson getting his funding from at the moment? He built a new base, he's throwin around flashbombs, got a new car...I'll need answers soon.

Posted by: Jay at September 1, 2009 11:09 AM

FF Reboot Dream Cast:

Stephen Colbert as Mr. Fantastic
Brian Posehn as The Thing
Patton Oswalt as Johnny Storm
Maria Bamford as The Invisible Woman.

Posted by: Paul Southworth at September 1, 2009 11:17 AM

Reboot: "We get paid obscene amounts of money to produce movies and we STILL fuck them up b/c we can't think originally. But we still have a shitload of money and your good ideas will never see the light of day because we're blocking the sun with our bad ideas."

Posted by: Recondite at September 1, 2009 12:55 PM

Well a reboot can't make it WORSE, can it? Those movies sucked donkey balls. And oh, the pie on Jessica Alba's face. HAHA YOU SUCK YOU PLASTIC PIECE OF BOREDOM ON A STICK.

Posted by: figgy at September 1, 2009 1:50 PM


The problem is they don't actually look at what made the stories they're trying to ape successful and popular. "Oh what, Jean was some sort of evil space Pheonix thing... whatever."

In software it's called "Dead chicken programming." You wave a dead chicken at the problem and it gets better, without you ever knowing why it worked. Similar to cargo cults.

Meanwhile, Posting 1, Bierce 0. Again, I fail at Interweb. Sigh.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 1, 2009 1:59 PM

I say we reboot the entertainment industry.

Posted by: coryo at September 1, 2009 2:31 PM

If you'll excuse me, I'm off to work on my plans for exploding zombies, who I will then direct towards Hollywood.
Quick Robin! Hand me the zombie repellent Bat-spray!

Posted by: s. pisaster at September 1, 2009 3:52 PM

LXG lacks anything remotely resembling positive qualities. It's actually quite extraordinary how badly they fucked it up. Sir Connery deserved to go out on a better note.

Posted by: Mick J at September 1, 2009 4:25 PM

I don't get it. I kind of understand rebooting an older movie. For those who saw it when it was new, it provides a bit of nostalgia (or a reason to bitch insessantly, whatever). I'm always a little curious as to what they will do with it this time around (don't hurt me, please). For the newer crowd they may be vaguely familiar with it or they may know the original by heart but this is the version for their generation and I bet that entices more than a few into the theatre. But this? This was four freakin' years ago! What next? It bombs this year, reboot it the next? Can't they at least let the corpse cool before they loot it?

Posted by: Eyvi at September 1, 2009 8:26 PM

...incessantly, even.

Posted by: Eyvi at September 1, 2009 8:27 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time