web
counter
 

Rumor: Rachel McAdams Attached to The Orphanage Remake and Shirley Jackson Adaptation

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (17)



RachelMcAdams-rachel-mcadams-741925_1024_768.jpg

This is a rumor at this point and does not come from our usual source, the incredibly reliable Hollywood Cog, so take it with a grain of salt. Just don’t rub it in your eye.

First up, it’s been a few months since he heard anything about the American remake of the Guillermo del Toro produced The Orphanage, which was also originally written by del Toro. The needless remake (as they all are) will be directed by Mark Pellington. My source, however, tells me that Rachel McAdams is attached as the lead, a woman who brings her family back to her childhood home, where she opens an orphanage for handicapped children. There, her son begins to communicate with an invisible friend, the same friend who terrorized the mom when she was a child.

I am hedging my bets on this one, however, as while I was attempting to get some confirmation on this casting news, I also saw a copy of Production Weekly note from last December which had Sandra Bullock in the lead. Given the genre, neither female seems a natural fit, but it feels like a movie better suited to McAdams. But then again, Bullock is a better age to play a mother. So, it’s hard to say, but I guarantee that the female role will be played by McAdams, Bullock, or some other woman. I’m leaning toward McAdams, if only because the source on this story seems to have some insight into McAdams’ career.

I say that because the source also revealed to me that McAdams is attached to the Michael Douglas produced We Have Always Lived in the Castle, an adaptation of a 1962 Shirley Jackson novel. Horror scribe Mark Kruger penned the script, which is a horror story that revolves around the Blackwood Family — two sisters and their uncle — forced into seclusion after the poisoning of several of their family members. Complications arise when a dubious long lost cousin arrives to secure the family fortune.

In addition to McAdams, Saoirse Ronan is apparently attached as the other sister, while Michael Douglas is set to play the uncle. If, in fact, both of these casting stories pan out, that’d put McAdams in two horror movies. It’s possible that she is attached to both but may drop out of one before the cast is set. We Have Always Lived in the Castle is still searching for a director.

McAdams is also attached or rumored to be in a Terrence Malick project, a Woody Allen movie, and a movie based on the life of Elliot Ness. I’d also expect her back for the Sherlock Holmes sequel.









A Weekend Comment Diversion: Road Rage | Pajiba After Dark 3/21/10













Comments

We Have Always Lived in the Castle was a girlhood favorite. (Yes, I was a very weird child; shut up.) Frankly, this cast has me excited. Rachel McAdams as Constance and Michael Frikken Douglas as Uncle Julian would be awesome! And in case you haven't read the book, the role would be a pretty major deviation for Michael Douglas...but I think he could be great.

Y'all should read the book, though.

Posted by: Jerce at March 20, 2010 6:05 PM

I'll just see it for Rachel McAdams...mmmmmmmm...she's pretty.

Sometimes I wish every actress had to do porn before they could get into mainstream film. So I wouldn't have imagine...I could just watch.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at March 20, 2010 6:26 PM

Screw The Orphanage...We Have Always Lived In The Castle sounds WAY more interesting especially with that cast.

Posted by: Clegg at March 20, 2010 6:29 PM

you can't go wrong with a shirley jackson adaptation... oh wait:
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm659200256/tt0171363

Posted by: kristin at March 20, 2010 8:17 PM

I'm getting sick to the eye teeth of Rachel McAdams. It seems like she's in everything these days. And I don't understand why. I don't hate her, but I don't think she's anything special.

Posted by: Wednesday at March 20, 2010 9:08 PM

there is no need to remake the orphanage. it's just fine as it is.

oh.... nevermind, carry on.

Posted by: captainfireypants at March 20, 2010 10:44 PM

Oh, I love me some Rachel McAdams... I think she should play the role of Phoenix in a re-make of Phamtom of the Paradise, with Ian Somerhalder as Swan, and Peter Sarsgaard as Winslow.

Posted by: maewest at March 20, 2010 11:10 PM

Count me as wary of this Shirley Jackson adaptation. The book was just too awesome. And the presence of Saoirse Ronan reminds me of that Lovely Bones abortion -- a terrible movie, based on an excellent book.

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at March 21, 2010 5:59 AM

Diane Lane would've been/would be just right.

Maybe Maria Bello.

I like McAdams, but they're at a different age and in a different league.

Posted by: William Goss at March 21, 2010 6:01 AM

"the same friend who terrorized the mom when she was a child."

I don't remember that being part of the plot. Is that something that is being added?

Posted by: ERM at March 21, 2010 1:44 PM

I wondered the same thing, ERM.

Remake not necessary, but I would have pictured Diane Lane over McAdams.

Posted by: MyySharona at March 22, 2010 10:40 AM

Yeah, screw the Orphanage remake...hope that thing stays in production hell forever. >.> Why does Hollywood feel the need to take perfectly good movies which are completely available and waste money in remaking them when they know they'll only make a little more than the film budget? Ugh. Xp

I liked the Shirley Jackson book, but I'm feeling in an awfully cynical mood these days. >.>

Posted by: DaftSteampunk at March 23, 2010 12:45 PM

Rachel McAdams and Saoirse Ronan as sisters....
Careful there Rachel, Ronan's some actress, and you have a career to think about.

Posted by: Cat at March 25, 2010 10:15 AM

The article well worth reading through. I uncovered them well written as well as quite simply easy to undestand. I wish to individually be grateful for the time period you spend to create it. My group is very pleased together with loose time waiting for future posting.

Posted by: Vickey Kinnare at January 7, 2011 4:19 PM

Your article value reading through. I noticed them well crafted and then comfortably clear. I want to in person appreciate your the time period you spent to publish that. We're very pleased and then lose time waiting for coming posting.

Posted by: Trang Dworak at January 7, 2011 4:28 PM

Fantastic goods of your stuff, man. I've understand your stuff before and you're just too fantastic. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you're saying and just how in which you say it. You create it enjoyable so you still care for to maintain it wise. I can't wait to learn far more from you finding out. That is really a terrific site.

Posted by: Venapro at January 10, 2011 10:01 AM

The book was just too awesome. And the presence of Saoirse Ronan reminds me of that Lovely Bones abortion -- a terrible movie, based on an excellent book.

Posted by: 0x800c0133 at February 9, 2011 4:59 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time