web
counter
 

Exclusive: Latest Movie Trend -- Suffer for a Year, Get Paid

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (10)



398-film_review_julie___julia_nyet563_standalone_prod_affiliate_81.jpg

If you’re a writer living in Maine, as I am, you’d have probably heard of W. Hodding Carter. He’s Maine’s answer to AJ Jacobs, the man who wrote The Year of Living Biblically and The Know-It-All: One Man’s Humble Quest to Become the Smartest Person in the World. It’s journalistic shtick, but it’s interesting and often enlightening journalistic shtick. Basically, you do something all out for a year, write about it (preferably, on a blog), sign a lucrative book deal, and sell the rights to a movie studio. Boom! All that suffering was worth it, and you win at life. Elizabeth Gilbert did it with Eat, Pray, Love and Julie Powell did it with Julie & Julia. It’s high-concept journalism. Find a compelling gimmick, make a fortune.

W. Hodding Carter — whose dad was the Assistant Secretary of State under Jimmy Carter — has made something of a career out of his peripatetic lifestyle. At 45, he wrote a book about trying to qualify for the Olympics as a mid-life swimmer. He sailed across the Atlantic in a Viking Ship. He canoed Lewis and Clark’s trail on the Mississippi, and he even wrote a book on plumbing (How the Plumber Saved Civilization). But it was his blog for Gourmet.com that has merited him the most attention and that now has culminated in a movie deal. Fox is in the early-stages of developing Frugal Family for the screen. Based on that Gourmet.com blog, Frugal Family is about a family that was living beyond its means (I believe I heard they were living a $120,000 a year lifestyle while only earning $40,000). So, he and his family in coastal Maine decided to live on a budget. A $550 a month budget. For one year, they accomplished this through farming, through eating out, through buying at liquidation grocery stores, and by using “dozens of other quirky saving measures,” like reusing paper coffee filters and bartering. (They are now living a modified version of that lifestyle).

I think after selling the rights to a movie, Mr. Carter can probably afford to live that $120,00 a year lifestyle again. The question is: Can a movie based on a man and his family trying to save money work in Hollywood? Much less as a studio project? It’s out to writers now (Michael Shamberg and Stacey Sher are producing), but my guess is only if it deals with an aspect of Hodding Carter’s lifestyle that many of us in Maine are curious about: Did his family resent the lifestyle choice they were asked to participate in? Every movie needs conflict, after all.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



News: How Very Witty of Them | A Movie About Caesar (But Isn't "Rome") | Five Characters Who Should Quit Their Own Television Shows | You Are the Weakest Link









Comments

Well, that movie about the fake family that tried to get everyone to keep up with the Jones by buying expensive shit, came and went at the theaters, so maybe a movie about a frugal family would do well in this economy.

I won't go see it, because it pisses me off when people overspend their budget and then make a big deal out of staying within a budget for a year. I've been staying within my budget all my life and my house is paid off, I'm saving for retirement, and I have no debts of any kind. Is anyone giving me a movie deal?

Posted by: BWeaves at May 19, 2010 10:48 AM

And one more thing. The only thing I liked about Julie & Julia was the Julia Child parts. They could have left out the blogger and I would have been much happier with the movie.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 19, 2010 10:51 AM

Hear, hear, BWeaves! Look at all the money that gets thrown at smokers, trying to get them to quit. You know what might work? Giving people who DON'T smoke $10,000 a year and a gold star.

Posted by: , at May 19, 2010 11:00 AM

I'm with BWeaves on both counts. Stupid bloggy jerks.

Posted by: JenVegas at May 19, 2010 11:02 AM

Dearest, loveliest BWeaves,

Please don't presume this as too forward, but your rally cry against rewarding people for fiscal parlor tricks and performances of bloggers that clutter up the grandness that is La Streep has left me, well...

I am so hot for you right now.

Warmest regards,
K

Posted by: Kayanne at May 19, 2010 11:07 AM

Even as someone who read The Know It All and enjoyed it...this gimmick really gets on my nerves. It all reeks of something hashed over Starbucks with one's publishing agent. Even done well, the conceit seems so forced.

Posted by: eskiimomo at May 19, 2010 12:41 PM

The wife had informed me last night that she is "over the new trend of Year in the life books." So instead, she plans on spending the next year, reading a bunch of "Year" books, and then writing a book about it. I propose the title, "A Year of Being Meta."

Any other suggestions?

Posted by: W.E.Coyote at May 19, 2010 3:43 PM

She should blog about it. Then she'll get picked up for a book and an editor will whip her blogs into shape for her.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 19, 2010 3:58 PM

W.E.Coyote, your wife stole my shtick that I gave no thought to before clicking on this Pajiba article. How dare she come up with my idea a day before me? I'll just have to go with Plan A of actually writing a book for my quick shot at a movie deal. Maybe I'll just dust off my "Northanger Abbey without the Gothic" idea to try and piggyback on the backlash against the "insert [monster] into classic" trend. Can't be any worse than Little Vampire Women...

Posted by: Robert at May 19, 2010 4:27 PM

BWeaves: 2, Stupid Self-Indulgent Arrogant Writers: 0

Posted by: stardust at May 19, 2010 7:31 PM