web
counter
 

Everything You Love Withers and Dies: What is Monday Miscellany?

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (24)



trebek-and-connery-celebrity-jeopardy-snl.jpg

It’s that time of the week again, that glorious and invigorating time when it seems like all the trade news worth writing about is bad news. This week it falls on a Monday, just to make sure that you’re really enjoying being back at work. You think to yourself, “self, work is too boring to contemplate after the weekend I had, and so I will steal thoughtlessly from my employer and read the mighty Pajiba instead.”

And then BAM, this post hits you in the mouth like a nail-studded two-by-four. But look on the bright side, none of it has to do with Twilight, so you got that going for ya.

First up, it looks like The Great Gatsby is finally getting made with a cast of Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey Maguire and Carey Mulligan. So far so good, great American novel, fantastic cast. So who’s directing? Baz Luhrmann. That would be the guy who directed Moulin Rouge, Australia, Romeo+Juliet, and Strictly Ballroom. Faaaantastic.

But wait! It gets worse! He’s insisting on making it in 3D! Having read that novel, I can think of not a single scene that would benefit in the slightest from the added expense of shooting it in 3D. Not one.

And Luhrmann insists that the film will pump $120 million into the local Australian economy where it’s shooting, starting a new golden age of Australian film production. $120 million? The Matrix cost less than half that to make. In what universe would The Great Gatsby have anything close to that budget?

(source: SlashFilm)

In other eye-rolling news, the Tolkien estate has issued a cease-and-desist letter to author Stephen Hilliard who has written a book called Mirkwood, which features JRR Tolkien as a fictional character. Here’s the book’s description:

Bold new author Steve Hillard’s wildly original debut, Mirkwood, re-invents J.R.R. Tolkien as a man haunted by the very myths he rewove into his famous works. As much literary criticism as boisterous epic, this episodically-driven plot explores the blurred borderlands where ancient tales, lost heroines, and epic journeys are stalked by dim monsters that will not be still. In 1970, Professor Tolkien makes a little-known visit to America-and sets in motion elvish powers embodied in a cache of archaic documents. Destinies are altered, legends become real, and two heroines must race for their lives in vastly different worlds.

The Tolkien estate is seeking to have publication cease and have all copies destroyed. Do you know what the dream of all writers is? To have books burned in their name 37 years after they die. I ordered a copy on principle.

(source: Blastr)

And saving the best for last, Joshua Jackson (RIP) is begging fans to watch “Fringe” because it is now on the edge of cancellation. Okay Fox we get it, the Friday night sci-fi death slot works. The study is officially large-n. Now can you move it to a tenable slot so that the show doesn’t get canned?

Jackson had this to say:

I’m a positive person in general, but we really need our Fringe fans to tune in and watch us on Fridays…We did good when we first moved, but last week we did not have a good week, ratings wise. It is going to take the people that like the show to watch the show and start the campaign and show their support if they want to see us stick around for another season.

The ratings last week dropped to 3.7 million viewers, down from last season’s average of 7.3 million.

(source: Blastr)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



A Body to Die for by Kate White | Apollo 18 & Transformers 3 Trailers | This Is The Year The Moon Destroys Us All









Comments

Wow, and I thought this was going to be a pretty good week. Look who's wrong. :/

Posted by: Whalen at February 21, 2011 10:09 AM

"The Great Gatsby is finally getting made with a cast .... He’s insisting on making it in 3D!"

Ah, ok that soun..wait WHAAAAAAAAAAAA?!?!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 21, 2011 10:12 AM

Maybe Daisy's drunk driving could work in 3D. Maybe. It would still be utterly pointless though.

Posted by: (Not so) Blonde Savant at February 21, 2011 10:20 AM

Baz Luhrmann is a great storyteller. I fully support his 3D Gatsby vision until I see compelling evidence not to. I'm imagining lush sets with hand-crafted fabrics, furniture, fixtures, and decorative items that will make an art lover cry tears of joy when they feel like they go on for miles beyond the screen.

Posted by: Robert at February 21, 2011 10:22 AM

Soooooo Gatsby will be played by a fully functional animatronic robot? Because thats the only way I can see this movie costing 120 mil. The Eyeglass sign could be made of 24k gold for effect I guess. Maybe they are going to build an entire city for their set? Nah fifteen bucks says the new Gatsby has laser sharks.

Posted by: Blank at February 21, 2011 10:22 AM

You're all off. The correct answer is: Luhrmann has to straight up donate $95 million to the Australian government before they allow him back after the disaster that was "Australia".

I like Luhrmann. I hated Australia (Who didn't?) but I've enjoyed everything else he's done. I think he's a pretty good fit for the material but the 3D thing terrifies me. I'll remain cautiously optimistic about the whole project.

Posted by: becks at February 21, 2011 10:31 AM

Great Gatsby 3D: Rise Of The Fallen

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 21, 2011 10:31 AM

I don't know. That scene where Nick Carraway fights those giant floating glasses would look pretty epic in 3D.

Posted by: L4NkYb at February 21, 2011 10:43 AM

I will try to watch Fringe this coming Friday. But if it's even close to as bad as I think it's going to be (apparently Peter and Olivia met as children, just to hammer in the idea that they're meant for each other that much harder) it will likely be my last.

Posted by: Todd at February 21, 2011 11:00 AM

The 3D thing baffles me. What, is he going to have rain or snow in every scene? Random explosions? Angry women throwing things at the screen? There is just nothing I can imagine would work well in 3D. It'd be like making Austen in 3D. Just flat out fucking stupid.

Posted by: figgy at February 21, 2011 11:04 AM

figgy, I'd pay good money to see Northanger Abbey in 3D. Just imagine the Austenites howling at the Gothic cliches lumbering towards the screen while shushing the lesser-read theater-goers during the lengthy dialog about 18th century novels. It'd be a hoot.

Posted by: Robert at February 21, 2011 11:08 AM

You know, if they add some unnecessary lensflare and excessive shaky-cam work Rowles is sure to cream all over his Dockers over this thing.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 21, 2011 11:13 AM

Ok, I admittedly haven't read Gatsby, but knowing this is Luhrmann, I don't get why everyone is confused about the 3D. The man likes to populate his films with very lush scenery and frenetic action. I can picture something along the lines of Moulin Rouge or Romeo and Juliet in 3D and it makes sense. Nobody would imagine that Romeo and Juliet would benefit from 3D, but what about Baz Lurhmann's version of Romeo and Juliet? Actually, I wouldn't necessarily argue that it would benefit, but it would fit with his aesthetic, is what I'm saying.

Posted by: dr. pisaster at February 21, 2011 11:31 AM

I've had a look at the proposed Gatsby budget. Here it is.

Salaries: $25 Mil
Sets and Equipment: $25 Mil
Exotic combination of Koala and Wombat blood with age-defying and mind-altering properties for cast and crew: $70 Mil

See, it doesn't seem so crazy when you see it detailed on paper.

Posted by: ed newman at February 21, 2011 12:11 PM

3D Gatsby = Sweeping CG shots of a car engine's inner operation = Missing the point

Posted by: superasente at February 21, 2011 12:18 PM

Why did you block my comment? Oh, why?

Posted by: dammitjanet at February 21, 2011 1:02 PM

OK I can see why he'd choose 3D, but knowing Lhurman the visuals would just make me dizzy, like at the start of Moulin Rouge. It'd be more confusing than ever and just color puking everywhere. Still think it's a terrible idea, but I guess we'll see.

Posted by: figgy at February 21, 2011 1:04 PM

Isn't Gatsby the so-called "Great American Novel" or somesuch nonsense? And an Australian is going to direct it, shooting in Australian?

Good Fucking Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at February 21, 2011 1:09 PM

Tobey, Leonardo, and Carey? I'm sorry, I can't see this happening. McGuire's always going to be Peter (emo boy) Parker to me. To see him in anything else, doesn't work. DiCaprio? Might work, if he's Carraway. Mulligan? Either she's Daisy or Jordan. I'd prefer Jordan. Daisy needs someone who is slighty refined and.......and C.M doesn't have that about her.

Posted by: Lord-ninja at February 21, 2011 1:25 PM

I had to do a 20 page book report on The Great Gatsby back in high school. That book was dreadful. But fill that movie with 'splosions and zombies and blood and guts, and I would watch it.

Posted by: Dingle Berry at February 21, 2011 1:26 PM

Arrghhh. There are very few shows that I watch that I really look forward to on a weekly basis. Fringe is one of those shows; it's consistently good and it's just getting better. Fox: ruiner of good shows. Gotta make room for that 10th hour of American Idol each week!

Posted by: Even Stevens at February 21, 2011 1:27 PM

I'm only gonna ask for one thing from the Fringe producers: CLOSURE

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 21, 2011 1:33 PM

All-singing, all-dancing, all-drinking....The Gr8 Gatsby!!!

The tagline: Ennui in 3-D!

Posted by: dammitjanet at February 21, 2011 2:29 PM

When did Joshua Die?! I see him every week! Man, I hope they don't cancel it, I have been itching to see a flaming Denethor run screaming out of Harvard!

Posted by: JDJ at February 21, 2011 10:58 PM