web
counter
 

Eve was Weak! Carrie Remake

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (24)



carrie-spacek.jpg

It’s Tuesday, which means that it’s about time to announce another remake that nobody wants, that will suck raw oysters compared to the original, will probably get made in 3D, and just about is guaranteed to make $300 million and kick off a trilogy of crappy films, because the universe hates you that much. How much precisely?

Well, Carrie is the lucky remake this time, one of the great teen horror films of the seventies, and one of the few not built around psychos stabbing skinny girls, rinsing (or not) and repeating. It’s also one of the few Stephen King adaptations, and there have been a lot of those, that manage to both be relatively faithful to the source material and a quality film in and of itself. King himself loved the film, which is significant since he loathed the other big adaptation of his work in the seventies, Kubrick’s take on The Shining.

What does King say about the potential remake?

“I’ve heard rumblings about a Carrie remake, as I have about The Stand and It. … Who knows if it will happen? The real question is why, when the original was so good? I mean, [it’s] not Casablanca or anything, but a really good horror-suspense film, much better than the book. Piper Laurie really got her teeth into the bad-mom thing. Although Lindsay Lohan as Carrie White … hmmm. It would certainly be fun to cast. I guess I could get behind it if they turned the project over to one of the Davids: Lynch or Cronenberg.”

I’m not sure Lohan could stay sober for long enough to film one scene at this point. And the cocaine’s adding enough mileage that she’s going to have trouble plausibly playing someone her own age, let alone a high school kid at this point.

But they don’t really need Lohan, since Megan Fox is rumored to be very interested in the role of Carrie. Sources close to Fox said this:

“Megan is 25 now but she’s sure she could still do justice to teenage Carrie. She’s told her people to make it happen. Megan is desperate to get away from her Transformers image and move on with her acting career. Theater really appeals to her. She has nothing lined up yet but she’s open to any offers. She hopes to mix theater work with some smaller indie movies and only do big movies if they are right for her.”

Being a cynical sort, I just assume that most anonymous sources are one of two categories. They’re either the individual in question speaking directly through a mouth piece to spread rumors they’ve designed themselves, or they’re pulled out of the ass of no one in particular. In this case, I’m just impressed that Fox had enough brain cells to rub together to remember to say all that in the third person as she pretended to be a source in order to beg for any work of any kind. It goes without saying that she would not be suited to play painfully naive and emotionally abused Carrie, but I doubt this rumor has the slightest basis in reality.

The last bit of news on the project is that they’ve brought in Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa to write the screenplay. He wrote six episodes of “Big Love” and has been brought in to fix the “Spiderman: Turn Off the Dark” script and to work on the next season of “Glee.” It’s hard to judge something like that. To date, he technically only has the “Big Love” credits, which is probably a pretty decent sign, and you can’t fault a guy for taking work. But dude’s going to have the Spiderman musical on his resume, and I don’t know how you come back from that.

(source: Blastr)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Celebrating Towel Day in Typical Pajiba Fashion | Dude. Really?









Comments

Ha! My chance to be pedantic! The Shining was 1980!

Oh my, now I feel smugly righteous.

Oh wait, I feel hollow again. As you were.

Posted by: Zuffle at May 25, 2011 10:33 AM

The dark haired girl on Glee, the one no one likes, with the big nose, would make a great Carrie.

Posted by: logan at May 25, 2011 10:34 AM

Ugh. I'd actually be behind a remake of IT or The Stand if they were done correctly. But Carrie? Whyyyyyy? The original is great and no matter what anyone behind the project says, there's really not anything to improve on.

Posted by: Matt at May 25, 2011 10:36 AM

Saoirse Ronan. Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

Posted by: branded at May 25, 2011 10:45 AM

Megan Fox is rumored to be very interested in the role of Carrie.

WTF? NOOOOOOOOO.

Posted by: Meander at May 25, 2011 10:46 AM

Carrie, in addition to being my most successful Halloween costume ever (I found the exact dress in a vintage store and the store owner was horrified when she learned I planned to soak it in fake blood for a week), was perfect the first time. I really can't see anyone but Spacek in the role.

Posted by: PaddyDog at May 25, 2011 10:49 AM

Megan is 25 now but she’s sure she could still do justice to teenage Carrie.

Ugh. Gross.

Posted by: Anna von Beav at May 25, 2011 10:51 AM

There was already a Carrie reboot/remake, it was made for TV and had....people in it. None of whom i can name.

But it was crap. But it stayed closer to the book, touched on Carrie calling down a rain of rocks and comets and it sucked.

Posted by: Nadine at May 25, 2011 10:51 AM

There was already a Carrie remake in 2002. I don't think they need to do another one. I don't think they needed to do the first remake but it actually wasn't too horrible.

Posted by: Sarah at May 25, 2011 10:51 AM

that will suck raw oysters compared to the original

But, but raw oysters are delicious! You analogy is confusing me. It sounds like it's supposed to be bad, but you are using a tasty treat as an example. I'm so perplexed1

Posted by: tamatha at May 25, 2011 10:53 AM

One of my favorite cheesy scenes on film is the prom chatter between William Katt and Sissy Spacek. Sooooo smarmy.

Posted by: DenG at May 25, 2011 10:54 AM

See now, this is what I'm talking about. Half naked women! Woo-hoo!

Posted by: superasente at May 25, 2011 10:55 AM

Clearly, I was so perplexed that my comment was riddled with typos.

Posted by: tamatha at May 25, 2011 11:01 AM

Ack. I'm still trying to brain bleach the cinematic horror of that 2002 bit of teenage masturbatory dreck. Fucking Hollywood and their stupid fucking sequels.

Saoirse Ronan. Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

Posted by: branded at May 25, 2011 10:45 AM

If this remake was forced upon the world, that would actually be a wonderful casting choice.


Posted by: Kala at May 25, 2011 11:08 AM

I'm only here because my name has been said so many times.

Nice for it to be related to something other than Carrie Bradshaw for a bit.

Posted by: Carrie at May 25, 2011 11:12 AM

Haven't there actually already been TWO pathetic made-for-TVish remakes of Carrie? I could look it up on IMDB, but I'm too lazy.

Anyway, there is quite simply no need for a remake, as the 70s Carrie still holds up without even the slightest hint of tarnish, much like Carpenter's The Thing.

However, if such an abomination were to occur, I co-sign Saoirse Ronan as Carrie. Now THAT is a good suggestion.

Posted by: MM at May 25, 2011 11:22 AM

Thumbs down on remake. Thumbs up on Carrie the Musical reference in the title.

Posted by: Erika at May 25, 2011 11:24 AM

Aha! I lied about being too lazy.

So I guess there was a "remake" of Carrie starring Angela Bettis and Patricia Clarkson, which is actually a pretty strong set of credentials. I have not seen that one.

Then there was the made-for-TV The Rage: Carrie 2, starring Emily Bergl, which I have seen, and it was about as lame and mediocre as you're thinking it was.

Posted by: MM at May 25, 2011 11:27 AM

Carrie is supposed to be an attractive girl everyone is convinced is ugly, which is the opposite of Megan Fox. She's also like 16. Idiots.

Posted by: Steph at May 25, 2011 12:03 PM

"She has nothing lined up yet but she’s open to any offers."

I never thought I'd say this, but that comes off as so desperate and pathetic I actually feel a little sorry for Fox. Though I'm kind of chuckling about her wanting to get away from her "Transformers image," as if there's a sizable contingent of discerning moviegoers who have gotten so used to her in giant robot movie roles that they can't accept her in anything else.

Posted by: Todd at May 25, 2011 12:12 PM

Steph, Carrie is actually supposed to be fat and kind of repulsive.

Since the story begins with her first period, the role definitely needs to be played by someone who looks very young, like 14-16. Saoirse Ronan would be perfect in that aspect, and she seems both fragile and intense.

Posted by: Christina at May 25, 2011 12:29 PM

The 2002 remake with Angela Bettis and Patricia Clarkson was the one made for television; it might have actually been a proposed pilot. IIRC, it ended with Carrie surviving and Sue Snell helping her fake her death and leave town to start a new life. Other than that (and yes, that's quite a big That), it followed the book closely.

The Rage: Carrie 2 was an actual film that might have worked better if it had tried to stand alone and not clumsily work in plot points from the original movie.

Posted by: Craig at May 25, 2011 2:53 PM

I feel as though I should be able to come up with something better than just "Why?", but I think the antihistamine is seriously screwing with the language center in my brain something fierce, and I just can't.

So...

"Why?"

Posted by: Jerry at May 25, 2011 3:59 PM

Been a looong time since I read the book, but I don't remember Carrie being fat Cristina, and don't remember her being described as repulsive except by the other teens (or perhaps by Carrie herself in parentheses), neither of which is a terribly reliable witness.
One thing that definitely has to be in the performance is something Spacek had in spades: the ability to act shy and self-conscious. Carrie is very much in her own little world of inner thoughts and doubts about herself. Does this sound like Megan Fox to you?

Posted by: dagnabbit at May 25, 2011 5:28 PM