web
counter
 

Emma Stone Up for Career Suicide

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (14)



emma-stone04280901.jpg

The absolutelywonderfulfantastic Emma Stone, after brilliant turns in Zombieland and, especially, Easy A, has now hit the big time. And the big-time comes with all sorts of pitfalls, namely blockbuster franchises and remakes. She could go on starring in smaller films that take full advantage of both her comedic talent and adorability, or she can choose to be a cog in another franchise.

EW is reporting that Emma Stone and Mia Wasikowska (Alice in Wonderland) have been added to the short-list of potential love interests for the new Spider-Man reboot. It’s cool that they’re being considered, and it would be a huge career boost for either of the actresses (both of whom are excellent; Wasikowska had a nice turn in The Kids Are All Right), but both of whom might suffer in the long-term for being permanently associated with this franchise. Undoubtedly, their own future reputations would track, at least to a degree, the success of Spider-Man. I do appreciate that Sony is going after talented principals — Marc Webb, Andrew Garfield, and now either one of these actresses — but I feel like they will lift the movie’s stock, and not the other way around.

Meanwhile, Variety is reporting that Emma Stone is circling 21 Jump Street, alongside her Superbad co-star Jonah Hill. Again, this is a project with talented directors — Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs’ Phil Lord and Chris Miller — but it’s a big-screen version of a beloved, but really not that popular television show. And as we know, even popular television shows haven’t translated well to the screen, and few have found any box-office success. Plus, from what I hear from someone familiar with Jonah Hill’s script, it’s absolute dog shit, though I understand it is getting a turd polish.

And while we’re on the subject of superheroes, word is — from Marvel president Kevin Feige, himself — that the studio is developing a Black Widow spin-off for Scarlett Johansson. I’ll leave the mockery to the comments section.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Is There Any Room in this Pocket for a Little Spare Chang? | Last Night on NBC | In Boxing, Everybody Loses | "Thrilla in Manilla" Review









Comments

The sad thing is, Emma Stone is absolutely perfect for Mary Jane Watson. Perfect. The timing is just all sorts of wrong. But, you're totally right when you say she would lift this movie's stock, and not t'other way 'round.

How about they compromise and recast Black Widow. Make Emma Stone a young, up-and-coming Natalia Romanov on her first big spy mission. Or, getting out of the Russian mob and joining S.H.I.E.L.D. I dunno. But Emma Stone can do anything, I think, and ScarJo just has a big rack.

Posted by: RobP at September 24, 2010 10:50 AM

So Emma is gonna play Gwen, right? That's how this works, right?

Posted by: Jay at September 24, 2010 10:54 AM

I agree with RobP

Emma is what I picture when I think of Mary Jane Watson.

If they're going to recast the Black Widow I vote for Emily Blunt.

Posted by: John W at September 24, 2010 11:00 AM

But you left out the most important piece of info about 21 Jump Street which is that Johnny Depp said he would love to have a cameo.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 24, 2010 11:09 AM

Seriously, how do you look at this and not see Emma Stone?

Posted by: RobP at September 24, 2010 11:39 AM

Mia as Gwen Stacy. Emma as Mary-Jane Parker. Perfect casting.

And yet, even with Webb and Garfield attached, I have less than zero desire for a Spider-Man reboot.

Aside from Nolan's Batman 3, could it be that I'm superhero'd out?

Posted by: Fredo at September 24, 2010 12:15 PM

RobP, ScarJo has a big wrack and a wonderful ass.
Case closed I'm afraid.

Posted by: supafly at September 24, 2010 12:35 PM

Those are the appropriate requisites for a porn star, supafly, not an actress. If that was her goal, I'd be all for it.

Posted by: RobP at September 24, 2010 2:35 PM

I'd have to say that ScarJo looks good coming and going. Pretty face and a nice butt. Oh, yeah, a big rack too.....

Posted by: The Shade at September 24, 2010 4:28 PM

I think Scarlett is overrated. I leaned that way pre-He's Just Not That Into You, but, after I got hijacked into seeing that damn turd, it cemented that opinion for me.

She was undeniably hot in the movie, but I wanted to murder-death-kill both her character and her personally for her portrayal of the character.

Her worst crime in a movie that was already the cinematic equivalent of Auschwitz? While flirting with Bradley Cooper, she nonstop bit her lip a la K-Stew. Ew and ugh.

Posted by: AngelheadHipster at September 24, 2010 5:15 PM


i know most of us think of these actors/actresses as artists
or, at least, potential artists and emma stone was just great in " easy A" but the bottom line is that they do this for a paycheck
and a piece of the " spider man " franchise turns easy A into
easy street.

Posted by: snake at September 24, 2010 6:07 PM

Jonah Hill best keep his hands off 21 Jumpstreet. This is the worst news I have heard all day and I just got turned down for 2 jobs in my company today that I deserved to have gotten.

Posted by: Alli at September 24, 2010 9:18 PM

I'm with snake. A girl has to life, and whilst a career as an indie darling may be quite continental.... Anyways, aren't big budget franchises how one pays the piper in Hollywood?

Anyways, it's difficult for me to tell, because it is different here in England: not an either/or choice. Many screen actresses start out on stage, which is sort of always there to fall back on just in case, or to provide variety/something to do in between films. They never make it as big as people do in the US, but an occasional franchise role is not frowned upon ... everybody just assumes they need money to buy a house, or something like that.

Posted by: SB at September 25, 2010 6:47 AM

beloved, but really not that popular television show

careful now...

Posted by: general rhubarb at September 26, 2010 6:44 AM