web
counter
 

Ebert Presents Exhibit A

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (40)



dukenukem.jpg

We don’t normally cover video games much unless Ebert decides to bring it or Uwe Boll purges another reel of film like a celluloid tape worm, but I thought that this deserved notice. Duke Nukem Forever has a ship date in May of this year.

I’ll let that sink in for a moment.

Then, I’ll add the mandatory caveat that the game previously had ship dates off and on for the last 12 years. Then, I’ll explain what the hell Duke Nukem even is to anyone under twenty who may or may not have even heard of it.

In the heady days of the early and mid nineties, PC video gaming erupted with an interesting business model by the folks who ended up making such legendary titles as Doom, Quake, and many many others. The bottom line was that these teams of a couple programmers would code games in their garage and release the first chunk of the game as shareware (meaning you could play it for free, pass it around, etc.). But to play any further, one had to purchase the entire game. It was in many ways the start of what became “demos.” One of the seminal games of that era was Duke Nukem, which was equal parts action and raunchy humor, and packed with homages to sci-fi action movies, like a 16 bit version of “Community’s” Modern Warfare. That spawned Duke Nukem II and then Duke Nukem 3D.

The titular character was a cross between Ash from Evil Dead (the cover image of Duke Nukem 3D is an obvious take on the movie poster from Army of Darkness) and various Ahnold characters. There was swearing, nudity, and an endless series of catch phrases that were mostly movie references.

When it was announced that Duke Nukem Forever would be released in 1998, it was assumed that it would be one of the biggest video games ever released. And then the delays began. I won’t bore you with the details, but suffice it to say, the Wikipedia page for Duke Nukem Forever reads like the antithesis of The Social Network. A couple guys start at the bottom, reach the top, and then become the laughing stocks of an industry as they revise and revise and revise … for thirteen years.

Here’s the trailer:

I have waited almost half my life for this game, and this is what the end result is? A couple blurred out asses, painfully witless jokes, graphics that look no better than games from a decade ago? The problem isn’t simply that this looks bad; there are a hundred merely bad video games every year that don’t merit mention. The real problem isn’t even the puerility of the entire thing, the reveling in juvenile idiocy that most eleven year olds are too mature to find endearing. No, the real tragedy is the sheer waste of the endeavor. When someone burns effectively unlimited resources and 13 years of their life on endless revisions, burning businesses down around themselves as they work towards their vision, pardon me if I have elevated expectations. To see an end result fail, to not meet those nigh unattainable expectations might be disappointing, but this is different, this is infuriating. This is not even trying.

This trailer? This is exactly what Roger Ebert thinks video games are.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Constant Princess by Phillipa Gregory | Simon West Talks Con Air 2 | Sunsets Are Beautiful. Newborn Babies Are Beautiful. This... This Is F*cking Spectacular!









Comments

Counterpoint: Mass Effect 2.

Someone needs to show Ebert that one. Or Assassin's Creed. Or, hell, any of a hundred other amazing, cinematic games.

But yeah, it looks like shit. I wish it didn't, but I'm not exactly surprised.

Posted by: TK at January 26, 2011 10:06 AM

Don’t jump to conclusions, Steve, he has got those balls of steel after all. This may yet surprise us all.

Plus if Ebert had played Duke Nukem back in the day he wouldn’t have the chip on his shoulder that he does now.

Posted by: zeke the pig at January 26, 2011 10:08 AM

Ugh. Revolting. Immature. Pointless.

...

I'd still hit it.

Posted by: Paul Southworth at January 26, 2011 10:13 AM

Unfortunately, it looks like the developers were so involved with this project that a myriad of gaming developments totally passed them by. In addition, I'll believe it when I see it.

Posted by: admin at January 26, 2011 10:14 AM

I have to disagree with your assessment. This version of the game couldn't have been in development for more than a few years. The game has been reworked so many times by different companies with different approaches, you aren't seeing twelve years of work.
And Duke Nukem is supposed to revel in juvenile idiocy. What the fuck Duke games did you play? That's what its all about.

Posted by: Zeff at January 26, 2011 10:22 AM

Any game that's been in development this long just cant be good. Look at Daikatana, for example.

It does look like crap. It's too bad. I finalyl got around to playing "Dead Red Redemption" last night and, so far, it's been more compelling than most westerns. And, as TK mentioned, "Mass Effect 2" was brilliant. Definitely my favorite game of last year.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at January 26, 2011 10:22 AM

Are you serious? This kind of crude humor is what Duke Nukem is known for.

By the way those graphics aren't from a DECADE ago.

Posted by: dave at January 26, 2011 10:23 AM

Unfortunately, this feels a lot like the video game version of "The Chinese Democracy" -- where the wait has elevated the status of the material beyond what it would have been had it come out in a normal timeframe.

And I remember playing Duke Nukem on PC back in my college days. Yes, it was a Doom/Quake ripoff. Yes, it was juvenile. That's what made it fun. It was riffing on the over-the-top action movies of the 80s and 90s (primarily Ahnold's oeuvre). But like the material it was making fun of, Duke Nukem is a dinosaur of an earlier time. It doesn't make sense in our world.

Posted by: Fredo at January 26, 2011 10:24 AM

It looks like the Duke may be Too Human in the end. (ba da, tss.)

Posted by: Markus at January 26, 2011 10:25 AM

Okay... I don't think you understand this. When you do revisions in writing, you remove small portions of the piece and you rewrite it and the overall piece is improved.

When you revise a game, you pretty much delete the original and rewrite the whole thing. The problem with the Duke Nukem team was that they wanted to be at the top of the industry, so whenever they saw a shinier and newer game, they said, "Oh no! That game looks better than ours. We have to start over again", hence, why they never finished.

This game is only getting released because the original team ran out of money and got fired. 3D Realms got sued by the publisher and eventually gave it over to Gearbox (Half-Life, Portals, Borderlands) to finish.

Posted by: Vi at January 26, 2011 10:26 AM

Is it just me or does Duke look like the lovechild of Max Headroom and Bruce Willis?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at January 26, 2011 10:32 AM

Vi, just a quick little correction: Gearbox is responsible for two Half Life expansions and Borderlands. Valve made Half Life proper and Portal.

Posted by: Gwenn at January 26, 2011 10:47 AM

No. Until it is in my console and I'm playing it, I wont believe this.

Posted by: Nadine at January 26, 2011 10:48 AM

Is it just me or does Duke look like the lovechild of Max Headroom and Bruce Willis?

Holy balls, he totally does. That's just friggin' eerie.

Oh God, now I just pictured that and I think I broke something in my head.

Posted by: TK at January 26, 2011 10:51 AM

its very likely to win the biggest disappointment of the year, simply due to expectation at this point.

Just forget you ever saw it and go cheer yourself up with the Portal 2 promos
although I hate that they have Stephen Merchant in them now he's the voice of FUCKING BARCLAYS!!!!

Posted by: PyD at January 26, 2011 10:52 AM

I was far less than fond of Duke Nukem [any version] in the days when it was popular. I won't call it a bad game, nor will I insult it. I will simply say that I preferred to play DOOM and Quake. When my friends switched to Duke I wasn't particularly interested and didn't enjoy the game. Consequently I have had no interest in the release of Forever, other than to get a good laugh out of its annual "Vaporware Award".

That is - until Gearbox cancelled additional DLC for Borderlands and indefinitely postponed its sequel in favor of finishing this project. At least the Forever release is soon enough that it won't be a long wait for Gearbox to return to something more relevant in today's gaming environment.

To those of you excited about the game: Hey, I hope you enjoy it and it doesn't suck.

Posted by: lubeg at January 26, 2011 10:54 AM

As a gamer I have to say I really do not give a damn about this game. I didn't care the first times it was announced and I care less now. I can guarantee the long, LONG road it has taken to come out is going to be more interesting than the game itself. The industry has moved on to more sophisticated fare. I understand there is an audience for meathead lowest-common-denominator games - just as some people willingly paid to see Little Fockers - but it really gives the industry a bad name at a time when it is fighting to be taken seriously as art and avoid knee-jerk regulation and censorship.

Posted by: TylerDFC at January 26, 2011 10:55 AM

Don't care at all about it not meeting any ridiculously overblown expectations some people might have.

All it has to do is offer up an entertaining slice of mayhem in the boots of the ol' wrecking machine himself and I'll be happy.

Always had a blast playing Duke, and I've waited far too long for this.

I shall have a blast once more!

Posted by: Murderbot at January 26, 2011 10:58 AM

The day Duke Nukem: Forever is released is the end of an era in gaming. A moment of silence, please.

Posted by: Chugga at January 26, 2011 11:21 AM

Just to clarify slightly. I'm not terribly critical of the visuals, other than it being an easy throw away rip on the game. Lord knows that graphics don't make the game, and I certainly understand that switching graphic engines over and over again meets rewriting much of the game from scratch over and over again. Though I will protest that if there was any actual content to the game (story, dialogue, etc.) that wouldn't need tossed out with the bathwater. And I get that Duke was just juvenile fun in the first place.

But, the makers of the game have repeatedly played the tortured artist card over the last decade. "We'll never ship a game early" "It'll be done when it's done right." When you play that over and over again, when you use insist upon hiding upon the dedication to your art, then by god when what you produce at the end doesn't deserve the label art you better expect to reap the whirlwind.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at January 26, 2011 12:18 PM

If this is the eye-candy trailer, then the actual game is going to look pretty primitive, graphics-wise.

I'm still gonna buy it.

Posted by: Barry at January 26, 2011 12:20 PM

@ Steven Lloyd Wilson

But none of that is the game's fault, or even Gearbox's!

You can hate on the guys who burned all their credibility by tryin' to justify the ludicrious delays all ya want, but the game can only be as good as it's simple Tit's & Ass + Explosions + One Liners = Awesome formula!

Posted by: Murderbot at January 26, 2011 12:27 PM

Posted by: bostonadrianne at January 26, 2011 12:35 PM

@ Murderbot

Contrary to Ice-T, I believe in hating the playa and the game. That was the precedent set by the Nuremberg Trials.

In this specific case, I will hate the playa, the game, the programmers, the designers, their office space, and the traitorous electrons that powered their computers. Because I am become scathing, hater of worlds.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at January 26, 2011 12:41 PM

This is still pending? Damn. I forgot about it years ago. It looks like it's stuck in 1998. That's a shame.

Posted by: Melody at January 26, 2011 1:22 PM

"Because I am become scathing, hater of worlds."

no, you're just a nerd who doesn't know as much about video games as you would want us to think. if you had actually followed the history of the development of this game, you'd know that it was saved from the trash heap by Gearbox. the game was nearly finished by that point but this was also in 2009, so they've had about a year to make it somewhat presentable.

in any case, whatever bitchiness you're currently directing at duke nukem should instead be directed toward george broussard, the guy who has been fucking this shit up for years. the fact that gearbox picked up his mess and fixed it doesn't really warrant you whining about the game (which should be exactly what anyone could ever expect out of a duke nukem game)

Posted by: buh at January 26, 2011 1:35 PM

@TK and Ms. Julien

Yeah, I saw that header picture and was like, Max Headroom as an 80s action star? Whhhaaaatt?

/don't play video games, not familiar with Duke Nukem O.G. style

Posted by: MM at January 26, 2011 1:40 PM

Duke Nukem is a simple concept for a game. You have a badass hero, babes, one-liners, aliens, shrink-rays, pipe bombs, THE BOOT, juvenile humor, and interactivity with the environment. That's what made Duke Nukem 3d the huge hit that it was in the 90s.

Every single one of those elements is in the trailer. Yeah its chauvinistic, a bit ugly, and probably won't win any GotY awards(save that for Uncharted 3 and Mass Effect 3 later this year). It's not something you want to show to your peers and try and justify your hobby as more than big dumb shooter fun. But Duke Nukem has never been that.

DNF won't change your life. It won't make you want to write down in your diary about the compelling narrative and sharp dialog and rich characters. It's a game that lets you shoot a giant alien in the face, rip his eye out, and kick a field goal. And finally, FINALLY, its gonna deliver on that promise.

Hail to the King, baby.

Posted by: Jeremy at January 26, 2011 2:06 PM

I'ma play it...because it's Duke.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at January 26, 2011 2:15 PM

Only partially relevant, but I *love* Chinese Democracy. That is all.

Posted by: S.K. at January 26, 2011 2:19 PM

When someone burns effectively unlimited resources and 13 years of their life on endless revisions, burning businesses down around themselves as they work towards their vision, pardon me if I have elevated expectations. To see an end result fail, to not meet those nigh unattainable expectations might be disappointing, but this is different, this is infuriating. This is not even trying.

Yeah! Who the fuck do these guys think they are?! Axl Rose?!

Posted by: PissBoy at January 26, 2011 2:32 PM

SK...get outta my bubble dude.

Posted by: PissBoy at January 26, 2011 2:43 PM

Duke Nukem movie in 10 - 9 - 8 - 7...

Posted by: superasente at January 26, 2011 2:52 PM

The Zero Punctuation review (?) of this game is required viewing for anyone remotely interested in it. I'd post a link, but I'm at work and I don't think I have the capability.

Posted by: StoatCat at January 26, 2011 3:01 PM

StoatCat, agreed, and here you go.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/zero-punctuation/1968-Viewers-Choice-Duke-Nukem-Forever

Also, agreement on the fact that Duke Nukem is juvenile fun.

/all out of bubble gum

Posted by: commanderfunky at January 26, 2011 3:22 PM

Meh, call me when they bring back Leisure Suit Larry.

Posted by: Paultera at January 26, 2011 4:52 PM

Pre ordered last week when the reveal trailer hit. Yes it juvenile, no it won't have a real plot or story. You job is to kill, kill, kill make smart ass comments and kill some more. I used to play games for hours upon hours upon hours including duke. I worked an evening shift and when I came home at midnight I would sit and play until the very wee hours. I slowed down my addiction mainly because all the games tended to blend together in the last few years. Flash one on the screen ooohh its army guys, its medieval, its science fictioney (is that a word) but none really have stood out for me. Even the vaunted half life two, which was enjoyable, wasn't ground breaking. I just want a game that is just a freaking good time. I want my duke nukem dammit.

Posted by: clancys_daddy at January 26, 2011 9:47 PM

I don't give much of a damn about this series, but the entire point of Duke is tasteless humor and over-the-top ridiculous bloodshed. It's like you never played the previous games. I don't get your complaint...the only thing I agree is that the graphics do look a little rough.

Posted by: stryker1121 at January 27, 2011 10:11 PM

you mean the sequal to a game were I paid strippers, drunk out of toilets and went to a porno theater is crass and immature?

Did you actually play Duke Nukem 3D?

Posted by: Ben at January 27, 2011 11:04 PM

Are you serious?? This game looks fucking awesome. It's like I just hit puberty all over again. Here, be a dear and pass me that tissue, won't you?

Posted by: V at January 28, 2011 12:53 AM