blogspot
visitor
Dollhouse | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

dollhouse-needs-1.jpg
Airing What They Paid For


"Dollhouse" News / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Trade News | October 14, 2009 | Comments (30)


DVR ratings are still in their infancy, but networks are starting to pay attention to them, which has granted “Dollhouse” fans a (slight) bit of good news.

“Dollhouse” only managed a 1.0 rating last Friday, which represents slightly less viewership than your nightly masturbation if you include your dog, your cat, and the nauseated government operatives watching you on Echelon. But, the DVR numbers show a 50% gain over real time (i.e. for every person who watched it live, a limbless torso watched it on his TiVo), whereas the average show only adds 14% to its rating. So Fox is promising to air all 13 of the episodes for which its already paid! That’s a step up for a Joss Whedon show, usually they just refuse to air the last few episodes and stop returning his calls.

Of course, the problem with percentiles is that 50% of nothing is still nothing, so “Dollhouse” is unlikely to get any more than the 13 episodes of this season. But since he can read the writing on the wall, Joss has said that he’ll wrap up the show to an ending point, you know, without having to get Universal make a movie and all that.


Matt Perry, Thomas Lennon, FlashForward, Lauren Graham TV | Alex Proyas to direct Tripods Trilogy





Comments

How does a limbless torso work the DVR remote? Does he have to keep it in his mouth the whole time, or is there one of those gizmos that works by blowing through a straw? And where is a limbless torso on Friday nights that he can't watch it live?

Posted by: Three-nineteen at October 14, 2009 9:05 AM

I only just started watching it, and I love the first season like I squeezed it from my own womb, but I am less enamored with the second season. Like the neighbor kid that comes over to play with my kid. This is, of course, with the exception of Viktor as Kiki.

Posted by: Patty O'Green at October 14, 2009 9:23 AM

I don't watch this show, I'm thinking about getting around to it, but for the moment I'd just like to thank you for letting me kick off my day with that picture of Tahmoh Penikett.

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at October 14, 2009 9:26 AM

I stopped watching about 4 eps from the end of the first season, with every intention of finishing. I'm probably not going to. I just don't care about anyone, or about what's going on, and I don't like to say that, since I'm a Joss fan. Or maybe I'm just a Buffy fan. Either way, it's not enough to keep me interested. And Eliza Dushku is painful to watch. Her 'acting' is dreadful.

Posted by: Carrie at October 14, 2009 9:35 AM

I howled at KikiVictor. Howled!

"I'm Kiki! I don't know how I got here; I so don't care. Am I drunk?"

Posted by: little ya at October 14, 2009 9:36 AM

I mostly watch Dollhouse out of sheer boredom, now. Unfortunate, really, as I enjoy most of Joss Whedon's efforts.

Dollhouse absolutely lacks any of the charm evident in his other shows and is entirely too hamhanded in its efforts to showcase Eliza Dushku - yes, she's certainly fun to look at, but she just cannot carry the show.

The writing is also evidently weak in every regard. Last week's episode began with such an interesting concept and then ran itself right into a cookie-cutter-sci-fi-cliche to make Dushku the focus again.

I had high hopes, at the end of the first season, when Alan Tudyk brought some characteristic Whedon charm and color to the show. But now I am Jack's Crushing Disappointment.

Posted by: Lubeg at October 14, 2009 9:38 AM

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I don't understand why Whedon keeps selling his shows to these Fox people. They clearly Don't Get It(tm) and proceed to crush his shows with terrible marketing, a lousy timeslot, and abusive 'get the ratings with the first episode or we kill the show' policies. I understand the appeal of network television, but is having failure after failure on network television really better than having some modest-to-significant successes on a cable channel?

Does Fox have some sort of abusive hold on Whedon? Is this like Stockholm Syndrome for television writers? "Oh, that's OK, I'll just make a better show next time, guys. No, no, don't get up, I'll toss myself out the window."

For heaven's sakes, Joss, go talk to the people at HBO. At least then we could wait out the "Scripts are gonna get better! Just wait!" phase with some entertaining nudity.

Posted by: snorklewacker at October 14, 2009 9:52 AM

I figure FOX has to take DVR (and online streaming - I usually watch it on Hulu) numbers into account for a show they put in the Friday night death slot (with no lead-in, even). Of course, the numbers still aren't very good all told. And I am a Dollhouse loyalist who has watched "Epitaph One" and all the DVD commentaries and all... but I've got to admit that if I were a more casual viewer, or someone whose geeky friend told them to try it out, I would have totally tuned out by now with the three episodes we have been given so far. This does not bode well.

Posted by: Caro at October 14, 2009 9:53 AM

I just don't understand what is happening with this show. The end of last season was so good! Alan Tudyk! And now...ugh.

The only thing for it is less Eliza Dushku and more Amy Acker and Alexis Denisof. In fact, let's bring David Boreanaz in there too and just have a sixth season of Angel.

Posted by: brabble at October 14, 2009 10:01 AM

I have been struggling with this show from the start. It keeps showing signs of improvement and then...ummpf. Watching some of Eliza's performances is far more cringe inducing than that Bruno flick.

*******SLIGHT SPOILER***********

And with Amy Acker gone... who cares anymore?

Posted by: TSF at October 14, 2009 10:27 AM

On a related note, I finally Netflixed "Castle" with Nathan Fillion. Once I got over the initial awful 5 to 10 minutes, it actually is a rather enjoyable show.

During the first 5 minutes, it annoyed me that the female lead was supposed to be "dateless" and supposedly didn't wear makeup (one police officer comments on that), and yet she's wearing an incredible amount of eyeliner and dark lipstick. She looks like a Russian supermodel. Also, I don't buy the daughter being so well adjusted, but she's cute and she doesn't wear makeup (yeah!) and I think I want to be her.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 14, 2009 10:33 AM

1) I've seen that photo before and I must admit I'm terribly concerned about the lower half of Dushku's body. Where'd it go?! I hope it comes back soon; I hate to think of the poor girl being unable to sit down due to having nothing to sit with. Put her intestines back in, you monsters!
2) I'm still tuning in to Dollhouse each Friday with anticipation and then, an hour later, wondering why...Most weeks. Last week was an exception. Mostly an exception.
3) The Internet is saying that Dollhouse is safe, at least through Season 2, because FOX knows they can sell it on DVD if they have a complete season. That doesn't mean they will air the complete season, no matter what some greasy executive said (he's a FOX executive, remember?).
4) snorklewacker is so right. The thought of Joss Whedon having the freedom of an HBO or Showtime series...God, I'm actually aroused now.

Posted by: Jerce at October 14, 2009 10:42 AM

Echelon? Give my regards to the nice men in black from Langley when they visit. Should be any minute now.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at October 14, 2009 10:44 AM

I'm a die-hard Joss fan, and I just can't get into this show. I keep trying, and keep getting pissed off at the same things. Using unbelievably advanced technology to make really nifty hookers. Screwing up every assignment with some unforeseen glitch that makes the active go wonky. Seriously, has any assignment ever gone smoothly?

Plus, I just don't like or care about these people. The actives you barely know since their real personalities are wiped, the clients are ultra-rich and usually assholes, and the only ones with consistent personalities run a nasty but far more boring and lamer version of Wolfram and Hart.

I don't find Dushku so bad as to be distracting, but Denisof without the accent freaks me out. Dude sounds so nasally. AND I'm annoyed that Joss went back to Fox, who screwed over my beloved Firefly. If any show deserved a second season...

Posted by: DeadBessie at October 14, 2009 10:47 AM

To be honest, last season of Dollhouse was good TV, not great TV. This season is kind of meh. There's only so many times I can see Eliza Dushku in a whore of the week costume. A bit harsh but then again, so is Fox.

Posted by: bignick at October 14, 2009 10:51 AM

It should be renamed The Eliza Show, because that's what we're getting. Hell, even Buffy (where Whedon was dealing with The Ego That Is SMG) showed all the main actors in turn in the credits sequence. But what do we get with Dollhouse? Clip after clip of Eliza playing dress-up. Yawn.
It would be better with more of everyone else (especially if they brought back Amy Acker and Miracle Laurie), and less Dushku.

Some friends and I were discussing the show last night. We agreed that the main problems are the wooden acting (headed by, but not limited to, Dushku), and a basic flaw in the concept. We can't get to know the Dolls properly as characters, because they are different every week. So apart from the enjoyment gained from watching the better actors have fun with their imprints, where's the emotional hook? They can tell me to care about Caroline all they want - but I remain resolutely un-bovvered.

Posted by: Tarn at October 14, 2009 10:53 AM

To recap the tired "origin story" again ... Dushku had a development deal with FOX. Talking with her peep, Whedon, about creating a show he allowed himself to get sucked in.

As for Dushku, while her genetic gifts are obvious, I'm actually seeing her some acting chops develop over the course of this show. Not great acting, but servicable. For moments. Now and then. Which is an improvement. Look at the boobies! Boobies can carry a show, especially if they're perky (& exceptional) - it's Fox!

The show, however is still a hot mess. I don't so much pine for the witty dialog and angst-y coming of age drama of Buffy. I am, however, intrigued by the tremendous potentialin the premise of Dollhouse, and the fact that they are all damaged, compromised and lost, and the considerable talent of the ensemble cast. Yet, each week comes up a bit short, for whatever reason.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at October 14, 2009 10:54 AM

Eh, I still like the show. I liked FBI guy better when he wasn't working for the company, though. I'm sure there's some surprise in store there, but... shrug. I'll enjoy it while it's still on.

As for why Fox is (supposedly) airing all the episodes, they probably just need to keep that time filled until they get their next reality show up and running in January. Midget dating show? Kid "talent" show? A hilarious hidden-camera show in which a financially troubled company has to lay off 20% of its employees? And the employees have to undergo various humiliating "challenges" to prove they're worthy of keeping their jobs. Or maybe Fox will finally start broadcasting executions.

Posted by: Slash at October 14, 2009 12:07 PM

Oh, just let it die already.

Have you guys considered that Whedon doesn't get shows on HBO or Showtime because...they don't want him? I find it hard to believe that he keeps pitching solely to Fox, the way they've treated him before. I get the feeling that Fox (who we know will air ANYTHING) is the only one willing to give something like Dollhouse a chance, and all the other networks probably turned him down. It's a bad show in a tough genre to sell, and it has terrible ratings. I don't see HBO or Showtime risking their necks for something like that.

*runs away from the wasps' nest she just poked*

Posted by: figgy at October 14, 2009 12:08 PM

Summer Glau, I just remembered, is going to be in a few episodes this season.

Just when I thought I was out... they pull me back in.

Posted by: TSF at October 14, 2009 12:12 PM

Figgy, you are not alone. Dollhouse is not True Blood. Or The Wire. Or Deadwood. Or Six Feet Under. Generation Kill. John Adams. Oz. Firefly had amusing moments but it wasn't of the same quality as those shows either. Neither was Angel. Neither was Buffy.

Joss Whedon wrote one major cult classic. He inherited his father's wit. BUT. He has major follow-through issues, doesn't know how to pace himself (or his storylines) and lets his affection for people blind him to their limited abilities.

Dead Like Me was a lovely little show (more it's first season than it's second). All of Joss' shows are on par with DLM. Wonderfalls. They are not among the best ever made.

The hardcore JW fans can delude themselves into thinking it's just that Joss is misunderstood but he's not. He's egotistical. Talented and egotistical. That is why he pitches to FOX. FOX is a major network. Bigger paychecks, more publicity, better shot at award nominations.

In my opinion, FOX has actually been incredibly generous to Joss Whedon. His shows getting the ax don't bother me like it did when it was Battlestar Galactica or Deadwood.

Joss Whedon is funny and has some nice ideas. But he's overrated as a showrunner and a writer.

Posted by: Sara at October 14, 2009 12:42 PM

Victor has quickly become my favorite, Kiki stole the show last week. Dollhouse would be worth something if that silly girl wasn't the focus. i could barely deal with her in Buffy. I am loving all of the BSG guest stars though!

Posted by: betty at October 14, 2009 12:50 PM

Sara--read BierceAmbrose's comment above. I had forgotten the origin story myself, but Whedon was not pitching to Fox, he was trying to come up with a show idea to feature Dushku because she was the one who had a deal with Fox.

Please, some examples of how Joss has shown himself to be egotistical. Because whenever I've seen him interviewed or listened to his audio commentaries, he's seemed humble and very down to earth, as well as hysterically funny. I never heard him say that winning awards or garnering a ton of publicity were his major goals; he's always said that he just wants to make shows that people love. And they do.

Plenty of utterly crappy shows get good ratings and run for years; it doesn't make them good. Plenty of good shows with a lot of promise get canceled after a few episodes, and that doesn't make them bad. What's clear to me is that a lot of people in charge of network programming don't know what the fuck they're doing.

If Joss can't get deals with the bigger networks, it's because they're morons, not because he's untalented or overrated. I don't think the guy's infallible, and I don't like Dollhouse, but I think that's mainly because he tried to design a show that was already cast, rather then develop a story and then cast actors who fit the parts. His shows made me cry and laugh more than any other so-called comedy or drama out there.

Posted by: DeadBessie at October 14, 2009 3:17 PM

Can someone 'splain something to me? Please? I would like to understand how people can think that Firefly wasn't a great show when shit like the current NBC Thursday lineup is on the air...

You had a charismatic cast, fantastic chemistry, drama, comedy, action, politics ... I just, I just don't understand. Frankly, I think it was Whedon's best show, hands down. Better than Angel and even better than Buffy, which holds a near and dear place in my feminist heart.
Certainly it had the best acting of any of his shows, that's for damn sure.
Am I sad that Dollhouse couldn't touch Firefly with a 1,000ft pole? hell yeah. Am I glad he will now have time to devote to developing a worthy (in my eyes at any rate) successor to Firefly. Hells to the yeah.

Side note: Ya'll remember how in Buffy, Faith's little saying was "Five by five"? Do you think it was a coincidence that Fillion said that in one of the episodes of Castle a couple weeks back? It stood out for me as perhaps a sly "hi Joss!" thrown in, especially since I particularly hated Faith whenever she said it in Buffy. Anyhoodles. [Fillion as Caleb = FREAKED my shit]

Posted by: Stella at October 14, 2009 4:26 PM

I don't usually go out of my way to watch television on Friday nights, and I imagine that many others who are the target audience don't either, so this makes sense. Unfortunately, I don't own a DVR. The quality of this show aside, Friday nights are a viewing wasteland for my demographic, and Fox is stupid. By their logic, ABC might as well start airing a drama about professional football on Sunday afternoons opposite the real games.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 14, 2009 7:02 PM

I went to the Dr. Horrible Paley event last year, and someone asked Joss why he keeps going back to Fox after what he's been through on the network. If I recall correctly, the answer was simply that they're the ones who are buying his shows. So, yes, he does pitch to other networks.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 14, 2009 7:19 PM

DH2 hasn’t made it to Australia yet so it’s sad to hear they haven’t capitalised on the momentum they established towards the end of last season. It really seemed like they had figured out a way to make their unwieldy premise work, but it sounds like they are lapsing into old bad habits.

As for “egotistical” how the hell would that separate Whedon from any other figure in mainstream entertainment? In his line of work, reputation and ego are practically currency. How else do you pitch the idea of a vamp fighting cheerleader to convince suits to part with their money? The guy has faith in the quality of his work and wants to pitch it to the widest possible audience. Unfortunately, it seems that the appeal of that work is limited to something smaller than the audience size Fox demands.

I agree with the comments that Whedon isn’t an HBO guy. He trades in smartly written pulp with fantasy plots and engaging characters which, while welcome, just doesn’t seem like HBO fare (“fun” vs “dour” maybe? I can’t quite put my finger on it). I often wonder whether Firefly would have been shitcanned so quickly had it been commissioned by the (then) Sci Fi network? Or for that matter, would BSG would have made it to 4 seasons had it been commissioned by Fox? He would be a big fish in a small pond, sure, but at least the quality of his work might stand a better chance of going un-fucked with. [grabs umbrella and raincoat for impending torrent of spittle flecked derision].

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at October 14, 2009 9:49 PM

Stella,
yeah, that sounds like a Joss shout-out. Apparently in the most recent ep, someone says 'two by two' - another shout-out? I haven't seen it yet, so I don't know the context, but it does sound like one.

Posted by: Tarn at October 15, 2009 10:40 AM

This is probably going to get me shot, but could you guys PLEASE give it a rest with the Firefly circle jerk? I mean, the show wasn't THAT good. To be honest, I tried to watch it...twice. I made it through 5 episodes and really just didn't give a shit about the characters. It was no Veronica Mars; that's for damn sure.

Whedon's work of genius is embodied within Buffy, and it is gone. Accept it.

That being said, I think Dollhouse is ok for filler TV, and I still have it on DVR.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at October 16, 2009 3:39 AM

People just need to accept that Dollhouse is not really very good and move on. Poe wrote a couple of meh stories, David Lean occasionally didn't catch the right scene composition, etc. This is not a show that plays to Whedons strengths. And I have to agree with multiple people here in saying (after watching her on Buffy, Tru Calling, and here) that Dushku is just not really all that in an actress. Edible, yes, fantastic rack, yes, but she has a fairly limited range. A friend of mine and I have a theory that Whedon gets crushes on his female actresses and this is just his Dushku phase.

As for the referenced five by five saying, it is rather common especially in the communication and radio industries, so it could be just coincidence. You can find multiple examples in shows and movies, Aliens is one I can think of off hand. It is very common to anyone who has operated a ham radio.

Posted by: frobme at October 16, 2009 4:46 AM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.