web
counter
 

Still Not a Ginger

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (32)



550w_doctor_who_0501_3_small.jpg

The new series of “Doctor Who” is only three weeks away and more and more details are trickling out, running the gamut from intriguing to worrying.

Good: River Song will be returning for a two parter later in the season. Which will be strange since the Doctor is now (physically looking at least) young enough to be her son.

Inexplicable: The BBC is officially calling this the “fifth series,” because it is in fact the fifth series of the new run. But Stephan Moffat has also been referring to it as the “first series” in various interviews and one of the stills from shooting (below) shows that they’re using “first series” on the snapper doodle things. So … I got nothing.

Worrying: Karen Gillan (who will play the new companion Amy Pond) says that there won’t be trips back to see Amy’s family: “Because Amy has no parents, she’s this Scottish girl in an English village. So they’re both lost souls that have found each other. And they both have a sense of adventure about them, and I think that’s what the Doctor loves about Amy. She has that spirit in her, and that fire. She keeps him on his toes.” Except that consistently what the companions have brought to the table is exactly the sort of grounding that family and connections provide. The companions that resemble the Doctor too much are the ones that can’t bring him back from the edge.

Meh: They’ve redesigned the interior of the TARDIS to be bigger and fancier. On the one hand it’s quite nifty because apparently they’ve added a couple of rooms (one with a swing, which I’m sure we’d have already heard about if Captain Jack had found it), and it would be fascinating to explore a little bit. It’s bigger on the inside, but how much bigger? I’ve always envisioned miles and miles of corridors stuffed like a hoarder’s dream. On the other hand, they’ve made the main room of the TARDIS fancier and shinier, with polished copper and multiple staircases. I frown upon change until its justified.

Odd: Nintendo has paid the BBC over £10 million (that’s metric for you, measuring mass in grams and cash in pounds) to create a Doctor Who game for the Wii and DS. I don’t own a Wii, but if I can use the wand controller thingie as a sonic screwdriver, I’d be willing to consider the ownership options.

A few still shots have been released from the first episode:

550w_doctor_who_0501_1.jpg

550w_doctor_who_0501_3.jpg

550w_doctor_who_0501_2.jpg

550w_doctor_who_0501_4.jpg

(source: Digital Spy and Dark Horizons)









Cheer by Kate Torgovnick | Casting for Joe Wright's Hanna













Comments

I want that tie.

And a Wii game for Doctor Who sounds awesome. A Torchwood game for the Wii, however, might be a little risky. (Don't ask about the Captain Jack Harkness mini game.)

Posted by: DoctorControversy at March 15, 2010 9:10 AM

I remain skeptical about Jr. Doctor.

I'm with my other favorite physician on the want for a Doctor Who Wii game. I think, however, a Torchwood Wii game would not be for the kiddies....I would very much like to get my hand on Captain Jack's controller.

*see what I did there?

Posted by: dammitjanet at March 15, 2010 9:23 AM

He does have the right manic intensity in his eyes to make it work.

Posted by: Adam C at March 15, 2010 10:04 AM

I will probably buy the Doctor Who Wii game. I just wish you could choose from all the previous Doctors. That would be the business.

Posted by: Kiddo at March 15, 2010 10:18 AM

I don't know about magic intensity in his eyes; in that first pic all I see is mental dimness.

I'm more than skeptical about teenybopper Doctor and his little groupie.

I'm not big on video games myself, but if Captain Jack gets involved in some sort of virtual reality sex thing, I need to know right away.

Posted by: Cindy at March 15, 2010 10:33 AM

Renovating the TARDIS?!

Posted by: vikky at March 15, 2010 10:56 AM

I hope that shirt is all wrinkled and torn up because something just happened to him and not his regular look. If there's been one thing consistent aspect to the The Doctor over the years, it's been that he is quite the natty dresser.

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 15, 2010 11:01 AM

I'm torn between my trust in Moffat and my dislike of change...

Posted by: dsbs at March 15, 2010 11:58 AM

I'm cautiously optimistic about the new series. The new Doctor Who series is kind of like sleeping with the club tramp: You guess it'll be a good time from all the rumors but you're not sure you won't catch some super STD from her well-used snatch.

Posted by: bignick at March 15, 2010 12:13 PM

Except that consistently what the companions have brought to the table is exactly the sort of grounding that family and connections provide.

I disagree. To me, this is the best news I've read yet. Throwing away the family connection perhaps means that the show won't be quite so Earthbound, which is the only characteristic of the last four seasons that has bothered me. Let's see more alien planets and imagination. It's a big universe out there, and constantly visiting the companion's mother in London just doesn't fly.

They’ve redesigned the interior of the TARDIS to be bigger and fancier.

Not unprecedented. Back in the old days we did get peeks at the rest of the interior of the TARDIS from time to time.

As for River Song, I'll be happy to see Alex Kingston back, but I do wonder how they're going to explain that dialogue seemed to indicate it was Tennant's Doctor that she knew. (Or am I mistaken about that?)

Posted by: DarthCorleone at March 15, 2010 12:21 PM

Darth: That's what I thought, too. Her dialogue really sounded as though she had interacted with him with Tennant's face at some point before. I imagine that Moffat will deal with that inconsistency pretty quicklike, though, so I'm not terribly concerned.

And Paddy, I'm pretty sure those shots are of him wearing the clothes Tennant was wearing in the End of Time, thus why they are all torn up. Eleven wears a little bow tie and suit jacket with elbow patches, which is adorable.

Maybe it is because I am a nerd in my mid-twenties myself, but I am rather looking forward to Matt Smith! I kind of think he is adorable. He's growing on me with every new shot I see of him.

Posted by: teacupnosaucer at March 15, 2010 1:40 PM

I remember miles of corridors in the TARDIS in the old days. I remember Tom Baker having a old stone cloister in it somewhere.

From "The 3 Doctors":

Patrick Troughton to Jon Pertwee: "You've redecorated the TARDIS. I don't like it."

Posted by: BWeaves at March 15, 2010 2:22 PM

The "You've redecorated" line was repeated in "The 5 Doctors," and Sarah Jane used it in her episode with David Tennant. It's a long running gag at this point.

Posted by: BWeaves at March 15, 2010 2:25 PM

>i>Renovating the TARDIS?!

So? Happens a lot.

Yeah, he's still wearing Ten's suit. Come ooooon, Paddy.

Posted by: Jay at March 15, 2010 2:35 PM

Her dialogue really sounded as though she had interacted with him with Tennant's face at some point before.

Ah, we're on the same side. Now that it's been contradicted I want a damn good explanation.

Posted by: Jay at March 15, 2010 2:39 PM

I liked the variation on that running gag with Tennant in "Time Crash":
Fifth: What have you done to my TARDIS? You've changed the desktop theme, haven't you? What's this one? Coral? It's worse than the leopard skin.


There was also one very subtle joke in that one that had me howling:
Tenth: And the Master. Oh! He just showed up again, same as ever.
Fifth: Oh no, really? Does he still have that rubbish beard?
Tenth: No, no beard this time. Well, a wife.

Posted by: branded at March 15, 2010 3:58 PM

The Moff's a cheeky one.

Posted by: Jay at March 15, 2010 4:15 PM

I don't care too much about the fact that the new companion doesn't have a family that we'll meet periodically. The Old Series had that for just about every companion, so it'll be just like old times. I was also sick of meeting everyone's bloody family. Even Adam, that two-episode companion back in Season 1* (with Eccleston) had us meet his damn mother. Mickey had his grandma, which was sweet. I know there's the whole "a companion with a family grounds him in the importance of trusting others" thing, but that was with RTD, and with Tennant. Smith might not be the "angry god" type who needs that type of reassurance. At least I hope he isn't. Moffatt did have Tennant do that stupid thing where he clicked his fingers and the TARDIS door opened, as if he were some kind of magician/near-God. So annoying.

*Oh yeah, and I am so peeved off at that "We'll call Season 5 Season 1 now. It's a whole new era!" thing. The Old Series went for 26 seasons, changing producers and doctors quite often (though the 80's remained quite stable producer-wise). It's daunting, but at least they'll know what year you're talking about when you say Season this or that. Don't mislead and inevitably confuse fans with this garbage. It's Season 5. I will fucking call it Season 5 because I remember Season 1.** If I say "Season 1" to my friends when I'm talking about Matt Smith's upcoming series, they'll be confused because THEY TOO HAVE SEEN ECCLESTON'S RUN AS THE DOCTOR. Stupid BBC.

**Like how I say "Twenty ten" and not "two-thousand ten." Fuck that "2000 is so awesome!" noise. We're a whole decade in now. Get with it.

ARGH.

(All this quotation stuff reminds me that I need to increase my vocabulary also. Sigh.)

Posted by: vic at March 15, 2010 5:01 PM

{suspends overwhelming desire to cling to the past}
I welcome this new Doctor. One must try new things, fearlessly embrace change. Tennant was glorious. I will miss him. But better to have loved and lost.....
This new guy may be JUST what the Doctor needed. Sometimes you find something you never knew was missing.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at March 15, 2010 5:40 PM

Darth +1, to me that read like a huge YES! For all the great things he did in raising DW from the dead, the constant running back to old Blighty was exactly what got so tedious about the RTD era.

The risk they run in making it less Earthbound is that it will become a little more science fiction, a little less popular fiction. In other words, great for me but maybe not so great for the wider audience.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at March 15, 2010 8:22 PM

I am absolutely terrified about the new season (which is SO clearly Series 5, watchoo talkin' bout, SMoff?). But I pretty much already hate the new companion. "Fire?" She shouldn't be off gallivanting for any old adventure, she should be emotionally invested in what happens. She's taking the Doctor's job!

I will absolutely hate everything about this until they give me a reason not to. I can't help it.

Posted by: esme at March 15, 2010 8:38 PM

I just don't know about the new Doctor. Change is good, but I hope it is good change. When Tennant started as the Tenth Doctor, I full-on despised him for three episodes...but then I got used to him. I won't lie, the fact that he's so damn good-looking helped him grow on me more quickly than if it had been up to his portrayal alone. I'm kind of hoping the same thing will happen with Matt Smith. He's no Tennant, certainly not as hot, but maybe he'll grow on me. We'll see.

Posted by: stardust at March 15, 2010 8:44 PM

Darth & Jay, I got the impression River dealt with a different future Doc, she did make note of how young Tennant looked. Mind you, it will be curious to see how they handle the potential continuity confusion if/when she meets Tennant’s baby brother.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at March 15, 2010 8:52 PM

I'm glad the assistnant is an orphan. All the families have been such whiners. I like the loose shirt & tie look too.

Posted by: Steph at March 15, 2010 9:12 PM

Jeebus, that's one fugly dude. That's all.

Posted by: figgy at March 15, 2010 11:23 PM

Steven Moffat had a good argument for calling it "series one" not "series five" (basically that the 'new' Doctor Who shouldn't be artificially distinguished from the 'old' DW):

“It’s Series Thirty-One of Doctor Who, and it’s Series One of Matt Smith’s Doctor, Those are both real numbers. I submit that ‘Series Five of Doctor Who’ means absolutely nothing unless you really believe that Matt Smith is the third Doctor. Everyone knows he’s the Eleventh Doctor so that means it’s definitely not ‘Series Five’. Whichever number you choose, ‘Series Five’ is the one that’s flawed.”

“‘Series One’ is an exciting sentence. ‘Series Thirty-One’ is an awe-inspiring sentence. ‘Series Five’ is a boring sentence - and also a complete lie”

Posted by: Jesse M. at March 15, 2010 11:32 PM

Jesse M.: Rubbish. So what if a couple of specials separated 2008 from 2010? It's the still the fifth damn series they've made since the show came back. It retains the basic storyline and mythos, so yes, you could call it Series 31, but then you'd be a huge geek, and technically incorrect as the New Series is an entirely different production. Even so, I still hold that if you say "Series 1" around most Who fans, even after this upcoming series ends, they'll think you mean 2005 with Eccleston. Unless they think you mean 1963, in which case they're insane.

So it's Series 5, dammit! The show kept going through 2009, and even though we've got new lead actors, a new showrunner and head screenwriter, and a couple new producers, it doesn't make sense to reset everything and call it "Series 1" when the previous Series 1 WAS WITHIN THE PAST DECADE. It's stupid and it'll confuse people, especially when the DVD comes out. Then it'll be Season 1 (2005) and Season 1 (2010)*. Just call it Series 5. It makes fucking sense that way.

*The Old Series DVDs, for those that don't know, are sold in single storyline sets (unless in a box set of sorts) with extras. They usually go by lead actor playing the Doctor than by the 26 series they had. Also, Season 1 in 1963 had 42 half-hour episodes, a number of which are missing, so it would be a weird sort of release.

Posted by: vic at March 16, 2010 12:08 PM

Oh, and, taking another look at Moffat's argument: Please. By your logic, Season 2 was Season 1 because it was Tennant's first year as Doctor. You write great episodes, but that's just ridiculous, Mr. Moffat. Also, nobody thinks Matt Smith is the "third doctor" from saying it's gonna be Series 5 anymore than they think Eccleston was the first. Like I said in my last post: different production. That goes beyond the show's mythology. Jeez.

Posted by: vic at March 16, 2010 12:13 PM

I hope that shirt is all wrinkled and torn up because something just happened to him and not his regular look. If there's been one thing consistent aspect to the The Doctor over the years, it's been that he is quite the natty dresser.

Perhaps he's still wearing the torn-up shirt he had on when he fell through the ceiling in The End of Time? Though I think that's a different tie.

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at March 16, 2010 5:28 PM

Mr Tusks: having just watched "The End of Time", I can tell you conclusively that it is the same tie.

Posted by: teacupnosaucer at March 17, 2010 1:44 AM

Ah, thank you.

And weighing in on the "Series One" garbage: It's the fifth season of the reboot, so it's Series Five to me. I know Davies likes to think that he's starting whole new shows with each new Doctor, but calling it "Series One" is going to confuse both potential fans and stockboys at Best Buy. It's the fifth series in a larger, cohesive story, so it should be called the "Fifth Series". That's it.

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at March 18, 2010 8:23 AM

There is no reboot. It's the thirty-first series of Doctor Who, the thirty-first in a larger, cohesive story,.... and the first with the current production team.

It's also the, uh, sixth set of production blocks made in Wales.

There is no rational reason to call it "series five" except to appease the stupid. No surprise that marketing departments might do this, but why would anyone else?

Only a stupid person would call it "series five", and I'm not going to, because I *remember* series five. Series five started off excellently. With _Tomb of the Cybermen_.

Posted by: Anon. at April 17, 2010 10:52 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time