web
counter
 

Doctor Her?

By Cindy Davis | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (26)



new_doctor_tardis.jpg

There have been drips and drabs of Doctor Who news the past couple of weeks, though nothing terribly interesting or concerning until today. I think we all knew this day was coming, the day of the Whostress…the Doctoress…A GIRL DOCTOR! Madness, I tell you!

Eh, I’m not really that worked up over it.

The more distressing news is that apparently the next series will be split asunder. Old Moffat thinks it would be nifty to have a break right smack dab in the middle of it all, with a mid-season finale. Twatwaffle must be watching and modeling on this horrible American television idea which does nothing more than infuriate loyal viewers and sometimes even drives them away. Oh and we’re not supposed to say that the series is being split in two, but rather “…two separate series.” Doctor Who will return with seven new episodes, ending in a “game-changing cliffhanger” (Doctor Woman?) - then return in the fall for six more episodes. The showrunner says that all of this nonsense, combined with a Christmas special, means viewers will never be more than a few months from a new series. Fanfrakkingtastic, right?

When asked about giving the Doctor a sex-change operation, Moffat said, “I think about it sometimes and maybe it will happen someday. It wouldn’t have been right this time,” he said. “A woman can play the part. You have to remember the single most important thing about regeneration is you must convince the audience and the children that’s it’s not a new man, it’s not a different man, it’s the same one. It’s a bigger ask if you turn him into a woman.” So while some outlets are reporting this tidbit as a given, the quote (taken in context) doesn’t seem to support the idea. Still, it seems like an inevitable evolution at some point - television is constantly trying to surprise and shock, and surely a female Doctor would stimulate plenty of controversy and conversation. Note Moffat’s use of the ever-popular “game-changing cliffhanger”; he’s obviously catching on to some of our bad habits. While sometimes it is cool to have a shocking, totally unexpected switch-up during the course of a series, some shows are at their best giving viewers what they’ve come to know and love and what they really want. It doesn’t have to be all bells and whistles and sparkly explosions. Better than a whoopdedoo mid-season finale might be a reliable, continuous schedule and a well-written show with great characters that keeps viewers interested.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Off the Radar, Will | Last Night on "Rubicon" | It's Rumorin' Time! | Fantastic Four Reboot Rumors









Comments

No. Just No.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at August 30, 2010 5:26 PM

I don't think I would continue watching Doctor Who if the Doctor turned into a woman. I honestly don't mean that in a snarky way, or in that way some television fans cry out when they aren't getting their way about something, but I don't believe I would like a woman in that role. I already REALLY don't like River Song (and just why that is I still haven't figured out) but she has been the closest thing, personality-wise, to a female "Doctor" I've seen thus far, and she makes me want to punch her in the neck.

If things with the show get to the point that they would need to go as far as to make the Doctor a woman, then I doubt there would be much saving it in the first place.

Posted by: ZombieNurse at August 30, 2010 5:28 PM

from all this talk about River Song, and this is spec, since I haven't watched the new series yet, but it almost sounds from reviews and other investigation that I've done, that River Song is a future incarnation of the Doctor. It would seem weird, but the way that she acts, and all that, would indicate that after the "Doctor Donna" incident, that it could almost become feasible.


I'm not saying I'm supporting it, I'm too ardent a fan, but nonetheless, it would be an interesting approach.

Posted by: LordNinja at August 30, 2010 5:32 PM

I think a non-white Doctor would be more interesting than a female Doctor in a dramatic or role interpretation sense.

Shorter runs airing more times a year would suit me fine as a viewer and I suspect that with the budgetary constraints that currently exist in BBCland, would give production more space to consider how best to apply and exploit the resources.

Posted by: PyD at August 30, 2010 5:37 PM

On the one hand, if they ever bring back Donna Noble, especially as The Doctor, then I am bailing on the show after 30 odd years.

On the other hand I can see that Donna would be the only one to be physically believable as a man regenerating into a woman-ish kind of person since she already looks like a post-op transexual.

Overall I just hope they don't ruin it like they did when they had the first female captain in Star Trek and instead of making her a kick-ass they made Capt. Janeway a whiny annoying character who kept getting her feelings hurt.

I would have no problem with River Song. As long as they give her a really hot male companion.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 30, 2010 5:42 PM

I think it's a stupid idea, because there were actually female Gallifreyans, we've seen them before. To change the gender of one of them just seems plain odd, if you ask me...

I don't necessarily mind the splitting of the seasons, but I don't want a massive cliffhanger and then have to wait three months to see what happens. A week is usually enough to drive me mad with curiousity, thanks very much.

Posted by: redfeather at August 30, 2010 5:49 PM

I don't imagine it'd be the whole game changing, probably just something disturbing about River.

Posted by: Jay at August 30, 2010 6:09 PM

Um, River Song can't be a future Doctor. It would make the sexual chemistry between her and No. 9 really weird.

Posted by: Stella at August 30, 2010 6:15 PM

I think there are several unspoken rules regarding the Doctor; 1. He must be portrayed British, 2. Though he can share traits with his previous incarnations, each new regeneration must show a Doctor new and unique, and 3. The Doctor must be male.

This idea of the Doctor changing gender was toyed about just as Tom Baker was leaving the role. He even went so far as to wish success to whomever took over the job whether it was a "him or her". The outcry then was overwhelming. Ethnicity is not an issue, but yeah, gender is.

We've seen women play Time Lords (Ladies) before. Romana and the Rani both come to mind and there were others. But while they too may regenerate, their gender also remained a constant. I know in the whole concept of a Time Lord's regeneration altering one's gender is no more far fetched than any other part of it, but still...no. If it hasn't happened or been mentioned by now after nearly 50 years, it seems like cheating to shoehorn this twist in now.

The only time the Doctor ever regenerated into a woman was the Comic Relief sketch "Curse of the Fatal Death" some years ago(also written by Steven Moffat). It was done as a joke, and that's about where it should stay.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 30, 2010 6:17 PM

Have we all forgotten about the Doctor's hot, cloned daughter?

Posted by: DarthBrookes at August 30, 2010 6:23 PM

I certainly try to forget her. It's the one episode of S4 that I've never watched again.

Posted by: ALR at August 30, 2010 7:17 PM

Finally, Darth Brookes. So the episode wasn't great, but if her temperament were more like Sparrow, I would watch a Doctor's Daughter series under the Dr. who team/monicker. I think it would be pretty dumb were River song to factor into 11's regeneration, other than her possibly delivering the sacrificial blow.

As to the half series thing, I don't really care so long as that shit doesn't get phoned in. If they're doing it because it's part of some contract negotiation, that's phooey. If they need time for production, cool. If it's some ratings game creative execs are pulling-- Probably gonna backfire on them.

Thinking back to this past Season of Doctor Who, it would have been highly irritating if they were to make me wait in the middle of the series for a Season.5 I may not may not have caught the rest of it, unless of course, they used the extra time to deliver more multi-level episodes.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at August 30, 2010 7:44 PM

But what if? What if she were a Jane Lynch type? Zooey Deschanel type? Maura Tierney? Toni Collette? (Isn't she British? I didn't see any on the "10 we should steal" list.)
Besides, you know they'd have a ball with River Song and Captain Jack fawning all over "her".

Posted by: jen at August 30, 2010 8:25 PM

Catherine Keener?

Posted by: jen at August 30, 2010 8:29 PM

I've been frustrated with the whole 10-11 month wait between seasons (with a piddling Christmas special to hold me over). If I have to wait 3 months on a cliffhanger, so be it. Nothing like a little anticipation to boost excitement. And I certainly support more DW throughout the year.

For what it's worth, we should trust Moffat (for now). I know production began on the new season back in June, so he's had plenty of time to plot and map this out effectively without this actually being an 11th hour, impulsive decision.

As far as 'game-changer' goes...I have no idea. My first thought jumped to the 'other' David Tennant doctor living with Rose in alterverse. The anticipation is already getting to me. Shit.

Posted by: Barnes78 at August 30, 2010 8:44 PM

No, Darth, I haven't forgotten her. In fact, that was the first thing I thought of when a "female doctor" was mentioned.

I would love to have her return and re-team w/ the Doctor.

As for River being "the next doctor" or what have you, I don't see it. After all, she keeps making references to how she is his companion in the future.

("My doctor opened the Tardis with a snap of his fingers"; "You leave the brakes on. YOU taught me how to drive this thing." etc.)

No, I think that we have a better chance of the old joke of the next doctor being played by sperm.

Posted by: Uncle JR at August 30, 2010 9:49 PM

Enough with the big finales and shit. Every motherfucking episode is a giant spectacle trying to outdo the one that came before it. Granted, it hasn't been that annoying this season. I hope my fury reaches them.

Posted by: sailboat at August 31, 2010 1:13 AM

Easy on the rip tide SAILBOAT. You're basically bitching at...most of the shows on television. Hell, even reality television is using the ploy when it's able to. I'm praying you reach calmer waters.

Posted by: Barnes78 at August 31, 2010 2:19 AM

I like you.

Posted by: sailboat at August 31, 2010 4:04 AM

I like you too, sailboat

Posted by: lol at August 31, 2010 7:03 AM

Toni Collette is Australian. The rest you mention are all American I believe. I don't think the issue is what "type" she is. Your choices indicate that she might be more acceptable if she were someone who is considered "cool" and I don't think that's so. Afterall Matt Smith, Tom Baker and Peter Davison were all about as cool as Houston in August. I think it's whether or not a female character could sell being The Doctor.

I suspect a lot of the opposition to a female is because the Ecclestone/Tennant legacy has brought a new element of a sexy handsome doctor into the mix (something that never existed before) and many of the hetero female fans just don't want to give that up.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 31, 2010 8:59 AM

I actually fantasize that I'm a famous actor and they hire me to be the first female Doctor.

Old Doctor to companion: "I'm sorry. I'm dying. But I'm not really going to die. I'm going to regenerate. I don't have time to explain."

Whoosh! Fire erupts from my head and hands.

New Doctor, Me: big sigh. clutches banister of Tardis console.

Companion: "Doctor! You're You're!"

Me: "What? What?" feels face with hands.

Companion: "You're missing a finger."

Me: holding up hands in front of me and surveying 9 fingers. "Oh! I wonder what else I'm missing?" feels up chest "Whew! Two hearts!"

Companion: "But you're a woman!"

Me: "Yes, well, I always was a late bloomer. That was the great thing about Galifrey, complete equality of the sexes, because you never knew when you were going to switch sides."

----------------

That said, the Doctor will never be a woman. I would like to see a different race though. A black man with a panty melting English accent could be really great.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 31, 2010 9:58 AM

"A black man with a panty melting English accent could be really great."

yes, bweaves. YES.

.
.
.
.

or Hugh Laurie.

Posted by: Stella at August 31, 2010 10:34 AM

Wait a minute!
I was just getting comfortable with Matt Smith.
I actually like him as the Doctor now...no need to go changing a good thing.

Posted by: Jules at August 31, 2010 1:49 PM

Idris Elba? It would at least rescue him from some of the shit he has been doing lately

My guess is it won't be that radical. Moffat has demonstrated an appreciation for the show's history, so maybe the return of Romana? The Doctor not being the last of his kind would be game changing enough and I like the idea of him have a female peer who doesn't come across as a smug confidence trickster or romantic foil.

Posted by: Punxsutawny Phil at August 31, 2010 8:08 PM

The only problem with the return of Romana is that it puts a "We're the last of our kind" spin on a possible hookup, which I don't like. Although I don't think Romana liked the Doctor romatically, like some of the companions did.

What I'd like to see is the return of Susan. The actors who played Susan and her boyfriend are still alive. Wouldn't it be nice to see them old and married and then Susan regenerates, and the hubby can't handle it and she returns to travelling with her grandfather?

OK, fine, the return of Romana then.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 1, 2010 10:05 AM