web
counter
 

If Only This Were A Documentary

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (52)



aae.jpg

More devastating than a potato famine, the U2 biopic Killing Bono is set to start filming mid-month in Ireland. It tells the tale of U2’s rise to fame from their early start. You know, back when they actually made real music. I’ve grown to loathe U2 with a seething hatred you can only find in ol’ backwoods racists. I can’t stand Bono and his faux activism and his keening wails over increasing electronica. As far as I’m concerned, if their plane crashed into the ocean after War and The Joshua Tree, the world would have been the better for it.

But this biopic actually sounds promising, based on Neil McCormack’s biography Killing Bono: I Was Bono’s Doppelganger. McCormack and his brother were classmates with Edge and Bono, attempting to start a high school jam band but with decidedly less iPod commercial results. The script comes from Ian La Frenais and Dick Clement who, while more recently responsible for Flushed Away and The Bank Job, were also the minds behind The Commitments. Nick Hamm’s directing (The Hole, Godsend), which is a weird choice, unless their planning doing my dream pic and atmospherically murdering the lads before they can subject us to their recent catalog. They’re filling the cast with every 20-year-old Brit with long hair, including Charlie Cox (Tristan from Stardust) and Ben Barnes (Caspian from the second Narnia flick), who’ll be starring as McCormack. Barnes was simply dreadful in Easy Virtue, so I’m a little concerned on that front.

If any of our Eire-jibans want to be extras in the flick, send an email to killingbono@hotmail.com. Just see if you can wear a Godtopus t-shirt and tell them it’s from Sigmund and the Sea Monsters.

(Source: The Playlist)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Ten Best Indies of 2009 | DVD Releases 1/5/10









Comments

Man, FUCK Bono

Posted by: Nadine at January 5, 2010 5:08 PM

The strange thing about musical hatred is that, with the exception of the most popular pop song at any given time, is that you can largely ignore it.

I like old U2, don't like newer U2, don't particularly care that Bono is a walking Live Aid poster, so guess what? I don't listen. It's called an IPod, you put what you want on there. Who either listens to a) generic radio stations, or b) watches MTV? 2010 people, you aren't turning the dial on an FM tuner anymore.

And lay off Bono a little bit, it could be worse, he could be Kanye...

Posted by: D-Day at January 5, 2010 5:10 PM

How would you react to this if you were Bono? Sure, you're pumped because they're making a movie about you and that feeds your endlessly starved ego -- but they're calling it "Killing Bono." They might as well call it, "Hey Bono, everyone thinks you're a douche."

You're Bono, so you're not smart enough to be conflicted. You're just...hmph...you're so confused you're paralyzed (let it be known that I don't actually have any idea about Bono's intelligence -- I'm making an assumption based on the fact that I've never seen him without his sunglasses, but I know for a fact that it isn't always sunny -- especially in fucking Ireland).

You know where it's always sunny? Yeah, you know. Go ahead. Somebody say it.

Posted by: superasente at January 5, 2010 5:16 PM

AURGH IT'S MY MORTAL ENEMY DRAW AND QUARTER HIM WITH GREAT RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!

(I mean Bono, not Prisco. I like Prisco. Goddamn Bono.)

Posted by: figgy at January 5, 2010 5:18 PM

I refuse to recognize there is still a band called U2 after Achtung Baby. The current douche-crew going around calling themselves 'u2' are impostors.

/same goes for Metallica after Black album

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2010 5:19 PM

You know where it's always sunny? Yeah, you know. Go ahead. Somebody say it.

Posted by: superasente at January 5, 2010 5:16 PM


Toledo?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2010 5:21 PM

....his butt?

Posted by: figgy at January 5, 2010 5:29 PM

Who's Bono again?

Posted by: admin at January 5, 2010 5:54 PM

"Who's Bono again?"

A musical has-been who died skiing into a tree.

Posted by: bleujayone at January 5, 2010 5:58 PM

I can ignore the music, but it's nigh impossible to ignore the fucking faux philanthropy. And you know what the worst thing about it is? One day my iPod shuffled to Sunday Bloody Sunday and and I went, "Man, FUCK Bono and his activism, I'm so tired of this shit!"

This is not the response a soaring generational anthem should inspire. Thank you, Bono, for ruining your own song.

Posted by: Ling at January 5, 2010 6:03 PM

To start, I wouldn't really call myself a U2 fan. I acknowledge that Achtung Baby was brilliant, but I also find value in some of the later singles, like "Elevation" and "Beautiful Day." I don't get why War is such a big deal, but hey, no one's perfect. I also don't get why everyone is so keen to shit on Bono.

While I spend my days complaining about my "day job" and writing reviews that serve no real purpose except to make myself feel better, like I'm some kind of second-hand artist, this guy is going out and trying to make the world (and I'm talking about the whole fucking world here, whether it's places that love U2, hate U2, or would eat a U2 record if they were handed one) a better place. I don't claim to endorse, or even know, Bono's personal politics, but I've got nothing but respect for someone who looks at the world around them and instead of giving way to complacency and apathy says "Nuh uh, I'm gonna try and fix this." So let's give this guy a break, let him comb our shit out of his hair, and let him get onto it.

...

Oh, and Ben Barnes sucked a nut as Prince Caspian.

Posted by: Death By Hippopotamus at January 5, 2010 6:04 PM

This post reminded me of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euhGPrgVZj0

And all was well again.

Posted by: TSF at January 5, 2010 6:07 PM

I fell in love with U2 after Joshua Tree, and I really enjoyed Achtung, Baby. I've liked some of their other songs here and there, but I've since been largely disappointed by how pop their sound has gotten.

And I must add that Death by Hippopotamus is absolutely correct in his (her?) assessment of Ben Barnes' performance in Prince Caspian. It was an awful movie to begin with, but Barnes' craptastic accent? I'd rather listen to U2's Pop on a loop for all eternity (that's supposed to be a punishment, btw).

Posted by: Jelinas at January 5, 2010 6:23 PM

Faux philanthropy? faux activism?

Bono got republican idealogical dipshits to visit Africa. Name someone else who could pull that off.

Posted by: Who Mad at January 5, 2010 6:23 PM

it's too strange all this hatred!
because Bono's a real unpretentious and clever guy and U2 is one of the best band in live!
OK their last album is boring and in live they're the best

Posted by: carrie at January 5, 2010 6:29 PM

Does Pajiba on the whole like anyone?

Posted by: lurker at January 5, 2010 6:31 PM

Oh BooFuckingHoo

Posted by: Jay at January 5, 2010 6:31 PM

You know what's hip? To hate a celebrity for raising awareness about certain issues. I will say this straight out: Bono does more for this world then the rest of you lemmings all put together and multiplied by a trillion. Now if someone doesn't like the music, that's fine, but don't sit on your high horses and denegrate a man because HE chooses to spend HIS time and money and effort to do positive things. If it's over saturation, then I can somewhat dig that, too. But for every vapid celbutard on the planet, your going to spew your vitriol at this guy? Please. A bunch of armchair activists the lot of you that bitch about this guy.

Personally, I think that the newer U2 is not really that bad at all, and some of it actually quite good. But that is opinion. What is fact is that Bono does a whole fuckload of good for a whole fuckload of causes.

Posted by: John Denver's Wingman at January 5, 2010 6:33 PM

Does Pajiba on the whole like anyone?

I think Pajiba just likes holes.

Posted by: admin at January 5, 2010 6:47 PM

Bono is undeniably a douche.

It's also undeniable that he uses his fame/influence (not to mention his money) to do good works, or at least try to do good works.

I can sneer at Bono for being past his expiration date music-wise, and for having a douchetastic personality, and not want to ever be anywhere near him, and still acknowledge that his heart is in the right place and that he has done some good for the world, which he didn't have to do.

Also, his voice is still remarkably good, isn't it?

Posted by: Jerce at January 5, 2010 6:56 PM

The early activism, the tone and tenor of U2's music was the very last hurrah for old school rock and roll, the dying echoes of a generation that once upon a time sincerely believed that we could change the world.
Nothing changed. It only grew worse. Aids and starvation continue ravaging Third World countries who suffer crushing loads of international debt. Rival nations still threaten each other with nuclear annihilation. We are almost a decade into pointless wars against Middle Eastern nations and our futures are leveraged by the Chinese, who prop up a shattered economy in which jobs become increasingly scarce. We face a divided nation with one side more than willing to throw racial slurs and threaten violence against our President.
There was a time when U2's anthems brought tears of joy to my eyes; now they only bring a profound sense of grief and loss for what was and what will never be.

Posted by: Spender at January 5, 2010 7:10 PM

When my parents divorced The Joshua Tree and Crazy World (The Scorpions)were the first two CD's my mother bought. Ever. She played them continuously. She tired of the Scorpions fairly quickly. No The Joshua Tree, though. Oh no! That shit got played from sun up 'till sun down. Through no fault of his own, the sound of Bono's voice makes me want to peel my own skin off with a paring knife.

Posted by: Eyvi at January 5, 2010 7:11 PM

Ditto, Death By Hippopotamus!!

I think U2 have recorded some pretty amazing things and are not so great anymore, even though they're still better than most little hipster/ indie bands getting a lot of attention. (Some of wich I really like).
And I relly value this 'stadium bands' who are not afraid to be big and popular, like U2, Bon Jovi, Bruce Springsteen, Coldplay, and such, even though I may not like them so much at times..
(Will I be kicked out of pajiba, now?)

Posted by: Mariazinha at January 5, 2010 7:38 PM

Honest opinions, well written NEVER get anyone kicked out of Pajibaland, Mariazinha. You're very much welcomed here.

Posted by: Spender at January 5, 2010 7:40 PM

Fuck all this hipster Bono hate. The man can sing. He's a rock star. Rock stars are by definition egotistical assholes.

I was never the rabid U2 fan, in fact I came to like the band only after seeing them live in the early 90s. Way late and several dollars short - I don't love everything they've done. But by Godtopus they are a fantastic band, and a huge part of their success is Bono himself. He can be whomever the hell he wants just like the rest of us.

Posted by: Cindy at January 5, 2010 7:54 PM

It's Philidelphia, people. It's always sunny in Philidelphia.

Sheesh.

Posted by: superasente at January 5, 2010 7:57 PM

I'm reminded of a joke.

Said Bono during a rock concert, clapping his hands in a dirge-like rhythm, "Every time I clap my hands, a child in Africa dies of starvation." Said a fan in attendance, calling out from the humility-silenced crowd, "Stop fucking clapping, then!"

Bono is tired. He may have raised all sorts of awareness back in his day, but but over time people have realized the hypocrisy of a man, rich beyond most people's wildest dreams, cutting corners to keep his assets untaxable while preaching about the need for charity and aid. I'm pretty sure that, if all the liberal celebrities in the world cut their spending to a single house, combined they could BUY Africa and feed all those suffering malnutrition until they gruesomely exploded.

Posted by: Ling at January 5, 2010 8:49 PM

It's Philidelphia, people. It's always sunny in Philidelphia.

Sheesh.

Posted by: superasente at January 5, 2010 7:57 PM


Well duh!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 5, 2010 9:08 PM

Ditto Cindy and JohnDenversWingman. It's so easy and boring and yes, conformist, to hate whatever/whoever has gotten a lot of press or stardom or has just been around a long time and think you're hip/righteous/in good taste for doing so. Have you actually listened to their new work or seen them live recently? And what is "faux" about the philanthropy? At least the man is doing something. What are YOU doing?

Posted by: Lilly at January 5, 2010 9:22 PM

Bslim, I was just being silly. I'm at work until 11pm these days and I MUST find a way to entertain myself in the late hours.

Silliness abounds.

Posted by: superasente at January 5, 2010 9:41 PM

The real question is, have any of you douchenozzles actually read the book that this film is based on and do you think that it will make a good film?
Personally speaking, I thought that it was good, but would be better adapted as a faux-biography, because as soon as you attach U2's name to a project, you get people pontificating about how self-righteous Bono is, without noticing the irony of their own actions/statements.
I like U2, but they are not the be-all and end-all of modern music.
Bono isn't the greatest guy in the world, but he does more than most Pop/Rock stars in raising both funds and awareness of injustice in this world.
Get over yourselves and look at a slightly bigger picture, twats.

Posted by: frank (aka frank_247 aka the lone Scotsman) at January 5, 2010 9:49 PM

Ling, what makes Bono responsible for doing x amount of charity work, or donating all his riches? He raises awareness. Maybe he donates his own time, money - but who other than him should decide what amount that is? Not me, that's for sure. Each of us chooses to do or not to do whatever. It's like when someone makes a certain amount of money, he's expected to turn into a saint.

Posted by: Cindy at January 5, 2010 9:55 PM

@ ling
If the British, French, American, and so many other governments stopped building bombs and guns and selling them to 3rd World nations to use on their own people and their neighbours, FOR JUST ONE DAY, we would have saved more lives than Bono.
Rail against the people responsible for the misery and suffering, rather than those that try to do something about it.

Posted by: frank (aka frank_247 aka the lone Scotsman) at January 5, 2010 10:04 PM

Ling,

Heh, I often thought that if Ted Kennedy (RIP) was so damned determined that everyone have health care, well ... the fucking Kennedys couldn't afford to buy health care for everyone?

You know what? You're allowed to pay more to the government than the tax tables say you have to. If do-good types want this program and that program, I'm perfectly fine with that. Whip out your checkbook and go right ahead. But keep your hands off my wallet. I'll support the causes I want to support, too.

Your rant reminded me of my rant. Thanks!

Posted by: , at January 5, 2010 10:24 PM

Oh, and as for U2, "Atomic Bomb" had its moments but not enough of them. It sits on a shelf somewhere. I quit listening after that, though I did see "It Might Get Loud" and Edge seems like a genuinely nice guy.

Posted by: , at January 5, 2010 10:26 PM

I don't get the sentiment that megastars like Bono's good works are somehow negated because he lives an amazingly lavish lifestyle that most of us can only dream of. Because he supports and contributes to charity, is he automatically expected to downgrade his lifestyle for appearance's sake and/or because most of the world can't live like that? If any one of us had the resources he had, I'm sure we'd be taking full advantage of it and hopefully we'd also be inclined to donate at least part of our time and resources to those less fortunate, as he does. Are we criticizing him because we're jealous? Faux philanthropy is only faux if you don't follow through. He follows through. Yeah, sometimes I'm annoyed by his sunglasses and his melodramatic pronouncements, but like someone already said, he is doing something. What am I doing? Sitting at home drinking wine and watching The Office, talking to strangers on the internet, thinking about all the little things I should do for people and sometimes do and sometimes don't. We all do what we can do. I'm no devil and he's no saint, but at least his actions are positive. This type of hatred seems misplaced.

Posted by: tinmo at January 5, 2010 10:43 PM

@ tinmo

*applause*

Posted by: frank (aka frank_247 aka the lone Scotsman) at January 5, 2010 10:50 PM

Tinmo, well spoken.

Posted by: Spender at January 6, 2010 12:20 AM

I think I must draw on my analytic skills and diplomacy, gruellingly learned at university and say to you, Pajiba, in the most scientific detached fashion i can muster, "Fuck Off"

now, to elaborate, in a more detailed way, Pajiba, "Fuck Off"

Like many have said, this is a man who has throughout his career been political and vocal, long before he was famous enough for anyone to give a shit. so he wrote some catchy tunes that made a fortune and now he keeps on plodding trying to do his bit as a citizen, and you piss and whine? Fuck off.

Just as an aside, the band has also poured much of its earnings into local businesses from where they come from, trying to keep their own community alive, while at the same time using their fame and public voice to try and influence world affairs in a positive way.

So, again, with ultimate politeness, take your "faux activism" and shove it up your useless fuckwit ass.

Posted by: idleprimate at January 6, 2010 12:32 AM

I actually have come full circle on the U2 circuit... I used to love em, went to hatred, and am now firmly in the meh, who cares camp. I do remember, however, an article I read once (one which I am right now far too lazy to look up and reference) that chronicled the expenses U2 racked up between their insanely large private jet and the ridiculously expensive shows they put on. So while I may not be out saving the world, I'm also not spending billions of dollars on, well, anything. Basically what I'm saying is, Bono can suck it.

Posted by: Even Stevens at January 6, 2010 12:34 AM

...and then i just read Timmo's post and feel like a jackass

Posted by: Even Stevens at January 6, 2010 12:36 AM

I can’t stand Bono and his faux activism and his keening wails over increasing electronica.

thank you sofuckingmuch for that

Posted by: krza at January 6, 2010 3:35 AM

It's threads like this that keep me coming back to Pajibaland. Because everybody is a little bit right. Do U2 suck a lot more than they used to? Yes. Would I still rather listen to Bono wail than to whichever 'next big thing' is panting over the radio? Yes. Does it seem a little hypocritical of Bono to live his amazing rockstar lifestyle and then tell us to give all our money to Africa? Yes. Does he have a point that Africa have basically been given the very pointy end of a very pointy stick? Absolutely.

Will I see this movie? Probably not, if I'm perfectly honest. Because I never seem to get to movies much anymore.

One thing to ponder, though: these days, more and more effort is actually going into reminding people that 10 years ago, world governments put into place a whole stack of goals to end world poverty by 2015. And then basically said 'fuck it, we can't be bothered'. People like Bono are actually there to remind us that we supposedly voted for these people who promised so much and are giving so little. Sure, Bono could probably buy Africa. If all of the people going to his concerts gave just $1, we could probably eliminate world debt. The point is that the world promised something and decided it was too hard and gave up. Reminding people to pull their heads out and demand action is actually kind of admirable.

Posted by: redfeather at January 6, 2010 4:29 AM

Ditto Tinmo. You can like the music or hate it, and I've felt both ways about the music of U2, but I agree with your sentiments. And Even Stevens, I don't see what your "expenses" argument has to do with this at all. What's wrong with putting on an expensive show? Are they billing it to taxpayers? No. They are employing the folks who help to put on that expensive tour, and putting money into the industries which support it. There are a lot of little guys working behind the scenes for these productions, and they still have a job, so good for them.
I'm not saying U2 is being philanthropic by dropping all that money on their productions, but there's no point in saying they spend too much money on shows. They can spend money however they see fit. Just like you can with whatever you have.
And frankly, Bono and the rest of U2 don't owe anybody anything. They don't have to donate, campaign or raise awareness. They could just sit at home and count their money, but the fact that they choose to work for a cause just deserves a bit more respect, in my opinion.
Love them or hate them, oversaturated and pompous or not, you have to respect them. And Bono, even if you roll your eyes a little while doing it.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at January 6, 2010 9:26 AM

If I could step away from the Bono hate for a minute (go ahead, just keep fighting among your selves), could someone explain why a film about four Irish lads is being cast entirely with Brits? Oh the irony since U2 spent the first 15 years of their career making sure everyone knew they were Irish not English.
Also, where are they going to find an actor hot enough to play Larry?

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 6, 2010 9:42 AM

I'd listen to U2 over Lil' Wayne and the 100% auto-tuned rap of today, or any hipster/emo/indie band that wears skinny jeans, has fans that drink PBR ironically, and is called My Morning Little Children Clap Your Hands Say LMFAO The MGMT Tings.

Say what you want about U2 and Bono, but at least they'll still be talked about 20 years from now.

Posted by: scorzi at January 6, 2010 9:48 AM

Maybe Bono himself sums himself up best:

I like the sound of my own voice
I didn't give anyone else a choice.

Posted by: , at January 6, 2010 10:22 AM

I think that everyone is missing the most crucial element of this whole post:- Ben Barnes (aka. Prince Caspian) cannot act, but he sure is pretty. Therefore, I may watch this film, even though U2 mean very little in terms of musical relevance to my life.
That is all.

Posted by: Squeeziee at January 6, 2010 10:38 AM

I loathe Bono. It's only one of the gazillion things Figgy and I have in common.

Posted by: Bizarro Sofía at January 6, 2010 1:31 PM

Whorish Mouth I mostly was thinking of how I found it interesting that Bono is out there all "we need to save the world" and end poverty and whatnot, and then he's spending billions of dollars himself. He should be setting the example. But I also concede the point that if I had as much money as U2 does, I probably would be doing a fair share of spending myself.

Posted by: Even Stevens at January 6, 2010 2:22 PM

As an Irish 'jiban let me just say, Feck Bono and his tax exile arse, lecturing the rest of us on our responsibilities to the rest of the world while he stashes his own cash in some Dutch bank account.

Posted by: csb at January 6, 2010 4:59 PM

The movie isn't about U2 -- you freakin eedjits! It's about a guy named Neil McCormick who went to school with them. And WTF? Anyone who nurtures such hostility for a mere man needs to get a feken life. Hate someone who is actually hurting you, not someone you just don't agree with.

Posted by: AltRockAddict at January 7, 2010 2:53 PM