web
counter
 

The Phoenix Will Rise Again

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (45)



david-lettermanh2.jpg

So, Dave apologized last night to Sarah Palin. With absolute sincerity, which should probably put this whole Letterman v. Palin debacle behind him. I’m a little torn about it. It was clear to anyone with four or more brain cells that the joke wasn’t directed at Sarah Palin’s younger daughter, and in a way, this apology feels like a moral victory for poop head Palin. But then again, Dave didn’t have to deliver this apology (the loss of one advertiser on CBS’s website, notwithstanding). But there isn’t an ounce of bluster or sarcasm in it, and in a way, this feels like the only genuine moment from this entire controversy, which basically demonstrates what a classy goddamn guy Dave is. Again. He didn’t have to do this — his ratings are up. He’s ahead of the “Tonight Show,” for the first time in years. And he could’ve probably soaked a lot of material out of this fake controversy.

But he didn’t. He recognized that some people — whether justified or not — were actually offended by the joke and not just standing on a ladder on top of their soap box of self righteousness. So, he apologized. And, I suspect, it’ll mean a lot fewer jokes about Palin on the show, which is another win. Mocking or not, the less we hear about her, the better.









The Cove Trailer | Bloomsday Celebration













Comments

I'm fine with the fact that he apologized (twice), but I must say, that little soapbox that Sarah Palin was standing on made me sick. And her comments about keeping her daughter away from Dave, making it seem like he was some kind of danger were really out of line. I understand the idea that children should not be the butt of jokes when their parents are the politicians/celebrities/whatever, but it was an honest mistake. Come on...when you hear the words "Sarah Palin's daughter" you automatically think of the one who got knocked up and was in the press all the time. I forgot she even had a younger daughter.
I don't know, maybe if I was a parent I'd feel differently, but her haughty outrage felt really false to me, like she was using it to get her name in the spotlight a little longer.
Kudos to Dave for showing class through the whole thing. I hope it is dropped now.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at June 16, 2009 11:10 AM

I agree, it sort of makes me sad that he's had to apologise to that witch but I respect him for being the grown up in the situation. I will bet cold hard cash that she refuses to accept it and goes on about it some more, then use it as some sort of building block in a plan to make TV more conservative and fitting to her narrow, creepy little world view. She'll be in with the dudes who censor your TV next all 'Dave is the deeevvviiiilll' and getting him pulled. If she can make Letterman apologise for a yes, crude, yes maybe slightly 'wobbly' joke, then what about the likes of South Park who will inevatibly have an episode where Palin's kids kid buys one of those Paris Hilton Stupid Spoiled Whore kits and goes crazy with it.

Posted by: Nadine at June 16, 2009 11:16 AM

Oh, Nadine, from your mouth to Trey and Matt's ears, please God.

Posted by: Jerce at June 16, 2009 11:21 AM

Now I hope she turns her attention to all these EARLIER instances:

www.huffingtonpost.com/shannyn-moore/top-10-reasons-sarah-pali_b_215468.html

Posted by: firedmyass at June 16, 2009 11:25 AM

I'll do what I can to make sure they get ahold of the idea Jerce....for you

Posted by: Nadine at June 16, 2009 11:30 AM

Dave rocks. Throughout the entire election season and through today, he has been a hard-hitting interviewer and nails the issue every time. I really think he contributed to McCain's loss (not that the old coot needed help), and his treatment of Blago on his show was just perfect. I could give a flying fuck about Palin's hypocritical "offended" act. How about she apologizes for some of the horrific things she insinuated about Obama?

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 16, 2009 11:33 AM

I absolutely wish he had gone the other direction, except that he would have had to step out into the light politically to make it work. My desired outcome was for Dave, who has an unusual credibility in this particular situation because of his politics, to say, "Many of you may be aware that I have been very loosely affiliated with the Republican Party for many years, though I am not devoted to either party. I usually keep my politics to myself, but this ridiculous nonsense, and Ms. Palin's utter lack of shame and honesty, require me to speak out. It grieves me to see the state of the GOP right now, that this meatbag full of venom and retardation is the standard-bearer for the party. Without a viable second party, a two-party system is a joke. Without decent candidates with an ounce of goddamn sense in their heads, there's no second party.

"Ms. Palin, I apologize to your daughter, though there was never a hint of a threat or insult to her. I do not apologize to you, however, because you are a cancer on our society. You have been hiding behind your family for a long time now, and this week you revealed just how much of a ludicrous jackass you are in that respect. It's my job to point that out, and I will continue to do so. You will never cow or threaten me with your idiotic scolding, you fucking toadstool." [/Dave]

Fuck you, Sarah Palin. Fuck you straight to hell. I hope the Republican Party is stupid enough to put you up for president in 2012, just so I can enjoy watching Obama destroy your stupid ass. Actually, if they'll puppetize Michael Steele a little more, that will be even better: two weak, empty stereotypes for the price of one.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 16, 2009 11:38 AM

Regardless which daughter was the target of Letterman's joke, as a parent I would've reacted much the same. I would hate for someone to make such remarks about one of my daughters on national TV. Your comments merely illustrate that you are on the "Hate Palin/Republican Bandwagon" no matter the situation. Sadly, most people of your ilk are sadly misinformed and blindly cast their votes for the democrats this time around.

Posted by: Jim at June 16, 2009 11:40 AM

i happened to catch dave's apology last night & it made me really sad that he had to do that. fuck palin and her skanky daughters. paddydog is completely on point about having HER apologize to obama. apparently, there's a website up called firedavidletterman.com & they're planning to protest outside of his show today. the only thing i wanna fire up is the murdertank & head toward alaska.

Posted by: gem at June 16, 2009 11:41 AM

Your comments merely illustrate that you are on the "Hate Palin/Republican Bandwagon" no matter the situation. Sadly, most people of your ilk are sadly misinformed and blindly cast their votes for the democrats this time around.

And your comments merely demonstrate that the only way a Republican can argue is by an utterly irrelevant personal attack and generalization that has zero to do with the issue. Very convincing. Because god knows Democrats don't read or explore alternative viewpoints and theories.

Oh, wait, I'm sorry. That's right-wing nutbags about science and Creationism.

Disliking Sarah Palin and how one feels about the Republican Party have very little to do with each other, as amply demonstrated by Letterman's personal history. Comparing Palin to Chuck Hegel or Olympia Snowe or even John McCain is like comparing a capuchin monkey to Albert Einstein. But please keep doing that; pump her up every chance you get, because a popular Palin is a slam-dunk second term for Obama and a follow-on Dem in 2016.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 16, 2009 11:50 AM

Let's hope this is the end of the David Letterman - Sarah Palin feud. While last week Letterman apologized, it was in a snarky sort of way, and wasn't accepted by Palin...
Exclusive Video here:david letterman sarah palin joke

Posted by: Alew at June 16, 2009 11:50 AM

If this sets a precedent for bullshit celebrities throwing mud at every comedian who makes jokes about them, then there's no win here for anyone who deserves to be alive.

Posted by: ChristianH at June 16, 2009 11:52 AM

The joke was lame anyway. If anything, dave should be reprimanded for total lameness.

In terms of offensiveness, it's no worse than jokes that GOPers have been making about Democratic politican kids (McCain on Chelsea Clinton having Janet Reno as a father, Rush calling Chelsea Clinton, then 12, a "dog"). But there was no rush to demand apologies from them, even though their jokes were at least as offensive as the lame joke Letterman put out there.

Posted by: eddie at June 16, 2009 12:03 PM

This echoes the whole Bill Maher debacle, and I can only say I'm thankful we have a new establishment. Otherwise, I would really be fearful of the nutjobs calling for Dave to be fired. What really irks me is that all this has given Palin back her chance at the spotlight, and Godtopus knows she wants that motherfucker shining on her at all times.

The best thing Dave can now do is to never mention her again. And really, she's not even worth a joke.

Posted by: Cindy at June 16, 2009 12:03 PM

A number of years ago, when Rush Limbaugh had a TV show, he made an horrible joke about the then 14 year old Chelsea Clinton. The setup was the White House getting Socks the cat-then Rushbo mentioned that there was a White House dog as well, and they flashed up a picture of Chelsea. When there was the inevitable outrage, Rush retreated behind the excuse that his staff put hte picture up without his knowledge. Here's hoping Pantsload thinks about htat when attacks Dave, who at least was stand up enough to apologize.

Posted by: Mrcreosote at June 16, 2009 12:08 PM

And to think, I just a few minutes ago wrote something about how I appreciate the "rational and reasonable" political discourse at Pajiba.

Yeah, yeah, I know: "Scathing ... bitchy ..."

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 16, 2009 12:14 PM

Jim, I think the one sadly misinformed here is you. I'm not saying I'd love it if someone made a joke about my child, but you have to take it in context. He's a comedian on late night TV. And frankly, Sarah Palin is doing nothing more than fueling fires to keep her name out of total obscurity. Anyone with any intelligence would realize that. He's a comedian...that's what they do. If all "children of parents" were off limits, EVERYONE would be.

And just for the record, I have a Political Science degree, and never have I EVER voted in an election "blindly". I'd say that my "ilk" can say the same thing.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at June 16, 2009 12:15 PM

Although I disliked the spectacle of someone I like apologizing to someone I don't, it had to be done. The joke was out of line, just as the Chelsea jokes were, and a stand-up (in the ethical sense) guy like Dave doesn't wait for other people to start acting right before he owns up to his own screwup.

I believe he believes the joke was about the 18-year-old. But all the NY news outlets had pictures of Palin around town with the 14-year-old before they even went to the ballgame, so how did the joke survive the writers' meeting? Somebody there had to know.

Posted by: sansho1 at June 16, 2009 12:20 PM

Whorish Mouth FTW.

Jim...you can pick up the 'Biatch!' card she just threw at your feet near the door.

Posted by: PissBoy at June 16, 2009 12:22 PM

I'm not a fan of Letterman's, but he handled this with a lot of class, and probably recognized that this whole feud only helps his ratings. As for Palin, she truly is despicable here--the insinuation that a teenage girl wouldn't be safe around Letterman is noxious and only prove how low she really is. What a living embarrassment to the Republicans she is, and a mess that just won't go away. She goes and lets her high school aged daughter's boyfriend stay over at the house so he knocks her up, then she implies that Letterman's a threat to young women???

Posted by: Bd at June 16, 2009 12:30 PM

I am just so sick of fake apologies, the whole "I'm sorry if you were offended" asshattery that always gets offered instead of a sincere apology. I mean, If you don't mean it, why bother? And whether Palin deserved an apology or not, that's something different. She got one, and it was sincere and David Letterman is a fucking Class. Act.

Posted by: Adahaze at June 16, 2009 12:40 PM

Your comments merely illustrate that you are on the "Hate Palin/Republican Bandwagon" no matter the situation. Sadly, most people of your ilk are sadly misinformed and blindly cast their votes for the democrats this time around.

Jesus.
You "Sarah is awesome" folks really take the cake.

Let's be clear here, Letterman made a sexist joke no matter who it was about....Letterman was an answer to the prayer Plain had sent up to get back into the public eye.
Oh, this was the perfect Faux outrage for her.

We can also be clear that Ma Palin is gonna milk this for all it is worth no matter how much of a crazy lady it will make her look, no matter how much it looks like she is actually exploiting her own kids for political gain.....again.

No one thought the joke was about her 14 year old until she said it was about her 14 year old. No one, but her and Todd the Tool, have made their older ADULT daughter a public figure by having her on the cover of People magazine and going around making speeches for the Candies abstinence show.
And no one has made their life into some crazy reality show except for them.
Ma Palin always goes too damn far and ruins whatever credible point she may have had at the beginning.

Why will this family not go away....

Posted by: Jules at June 16, 2009 12:58 PM

Jules, a great many people thought the joke was about the 14-year-old, because that's who was at the ballgame.

Posted by: sansho1 at June 16, 2009 1:09 PM

Jim

I agree with you in principle, that often times, people have their prepared conception of whether someone or something is wrong. But, here, I don't think it is fair to assume that is the case.

From a non-partisan perspective,if you run for office, you should be prepared for ALL of your business (including children) to be fair game for politicians, reporters, and comedians. If you can't handle that, don't run for office. Clinton's whole family received a great deal of "scrutiny" as well.

From a partisan perspective, I am conservative but consider Palin to be an abomination. I suspect that Palin upsets me more than your average card-carrying member of the ACLU because it is people like her who are destroying the republican party. She is completely over-reacting in order to get attention, and it is not the way a proposed commander in chief ought to behave. Take the high ground, acknowledge that it was a mistake, and move on.

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 16, 2009 1:19 PM

14 years old or not, the joke was awesome. Cuz what's better than knocking up a 14 year old?! Especially if the baby-daddy is A-rod. Plain should be licking Letterman's sweaty yam bag for planting the seeds of a Palin/A-Rod union. She would NEVER be out of the headlines and could do all the day-time chat shows. She could go on Wendy O and talk about how much fun it is to have A-Rod as her future son in law (after 3 years of courting of course). Then, for SOOOOOOME odd reason, after A-Rod and Willow (peck! Peck! Peck! Peck! PECK!!!) decide not to get married after her failed presidential run, she can go on the circuit again! She totally just lost out on YEARS of front-page news with her mock-outrage. Typical Palin, not thinking before she reacts. Silver lining Sarah. You missed the silver lining. A-Rod is impresionable and willing to please anyone. And for all we know, he might actually think he DID knock up Willow. His recollection of things past seem pretty suspect as I recall from all the steroids stuff. Nothing a crying teenager, a popsicle stick painted pink (for positive) at the tip, and a broken condom couldn't have convinced him of.

Posted by: PissBoy at June 16, 2009 1:20 PM

There are some days I'm ashamed to have this name...

Posted by: Jim Doggie at June 16, 2009 2:02 PM

meanwhile, a man actually DID rape a 4 year old (4, not 14) and is getting one ONE! year in jail. Todd Palin twists a joke about his eldest daughter into a threat about raping his 14-year-old and people want David Letterman fired for it. The Palin cult need to drink their fucking koolade already. I'm ashamed of Dave for bowing to the pressure, and hope the rumor is true that he only did it because his mom asked him to.

Posted by: snarla at June 16, 2009 2:05 PM

"Comparing Palin to Chuck Hegel or Olympia Snowe or even John McCain is like comparing a capuchin monkey to Albert Einstein."

I would compare Sarah Palin to:
Jim Jones
Charles Manson
David Koresh
Marshall Applewhite

Just because she has a following doesn't mean she's credible. Do I think all Republicans are scumbags? NO. I don't. In fact, I know quite a few who are perfectly fine people and I gladly defend them when people bash their party. But I don't consider SP a politician. She's a celebuwhore psychopath and nothing else. Do I think Sara Palin is the scourge of the Earth and the shame of my gender? YES. Yes, I do.

Posted by: snarla at June 16, 2009 2:15 PM

"Intent vs perception" Very smart, Dave. Very smart indeed. I think it could turn out great for him if she keeps harping on about this. He has apologised in a very sincere, erudite manner. If she doesn't let it go, then she will just be bringing a knife, not just to a gun fight, but an artillery barrage.

Posted by: Odnon at June 16, 2009 2:31 PM

"She goes and lets her high school aged daughter's boyfriend stay over at the house so he knocks her up, then she implies that Letterman's a threat to young women???"

BD, you took the words out of my mouth. Yes, Sarah and Todd, you keep on safeguarding those kiddies of yours, just like you safeguard all those other fourteen-year old girls out there who can't elect to have a fucking abortion under your logic, even if they've been raped (statutorily or otherwise), even if Uncle Bill is the father.

And lest we forget, Sarah, your daughter did, in fact GET KNOCKED UP. Sorry to put it so crudely, but one isn't "impregnated" by Levi, one's "knocked up."

I really think these people are such pieces of shit. Sorry for the unchecked vitriol.

Posted by: samantha t at June 16, 2009 3:10 PM

Sorry to put it so crudely, but one isn't "impregnated" by Levi, one's "knocked up."

Palin should also be grateful that no one seems to be paying attention to the oh-so-convenient post-election breakup of the Levi-Bristol "engagement," which would be better joke fodder.

I will immodestly point out that I predicted way before the election, in this space, that Levi and Bristol would NEVER get married and that the whole thing was a lie so that Palin would have a shot at not sinking the McCain ticket. There was never the slightest intent that those two would get married, and Palin should be called to account for that fundamental dishonesty about her utter inability to even approximate the rules and expectations she wants to impose on other people.

Palin is an evil liar, which has nothing to do with core conservative values but everything to do with what the modern RNC is willing to do to keep power -- just as Michael Steele is another example of the same thing. "Hillary's out of the race? Let's get a woman candidate, dumb bitch voters won't know the difference!" "Black president elected? [GULP] Well, fuck me let's get us that one Negro that's in our party! Dumb black voters won't know the difference. Let's make sure he talks some of that "hippety-hop" the young people are offending Baby Jesus with. Soon as he finishes sweeping, o'course."

Fuckers.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 16, 2009 4:06 PM

Socalled: I am so thrilled that Levi has simply refused to drop off the planet solely to placate them. You know it drives them BATSHIT when he gives interviews, appears in pictures with the baby, etc.

I'm also of the belief that Trig is Bristol's baby. There, I said it.

Posted by: samantha t at June 16, 2009 4:10 PM

You know it drives them BATSHIT when he gives interviews, appears in pictures with the baby, etc.

I just pray he comes clean about what actually happened, preferably on the eve of any election involving Palin: "Yeah, now that I'm safely out of Alaska and away from the Palins and their helicopter and long range rifles, I can admit that they made me say we were getting married, during the same conversation in which they told me they'd never actually let their daughter marry me."

And I agree about Trig. That whole family is just really off, like a dead raccoon in a hot attic.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at June 16, 2009 4:17 PM

It’s official Letterman, you’re now officially a pussy. I was so embarrassed for you I couldn’t even bring myself to watch you make a fool of yourself with your apology. Son, you’re a billionaire, a t.v. icon, and you thought it was necessary to apologize to this raging thunder cunt? So long Dave, have a nice life.

Posted by: Guess Who! at June 16, 2009 7:11 PM

Umm...

I mean - I fucking hate Sarah Palin. But Letterman's jokes were sexist. In my book, that is inexcusable. I'm glad he apologized. Why wouldn't he?

Call me a feminazi, but I can't stand sex jokes about women who aren't prostitutes or strippers. I mean, yeah Palin is pretty and probably pretty dumb and her daughter is a teenaged mother, but that doesn't justify jokes about her being a "slut" or her daughter getting knocked up during a brief encounter with an athlete. By those standards we can start making nasty jokes about Obama's mother.

And he's not a "pussy" for apologizing.

*sigh*

Posted by: Kayla at June 16, 2009 11:28 PM

I guess I'll never understand the weird hatred of Palin. I'm a registered republican, and I didn't vote for McCain/Palin (I was getting my Hummer re upholstered with baby seal leather, I think). She seemed a little dingy and McCain was barely a member of the GOP anyway. But damn, you people hate this lady. She may not come off as mensa material, but a least she's not trying to spend her way out of debt and reason and apologize to holocaust deniers, but fuck her, she wears too much make-up and she's somewhat attractive and accomplished yet doesn't fall in line with the left. Oh, and her daughter is kinda easy, apparently. Ha ha.
Look, it was a weak joke that Letterman shouldn't have made. The sexist joke is in the same league as the racist joke. He should have apologized and I'm glad he did, I think more of him now.

Posted by: NameWithheld at June 17, 2009 4:29 AM

Kayla, as far as I'm concerned jokes about Obama's mother are okay. I'm of the opinion that nothing should be off limits.

I'm sad to see Dave apologize. If he thought it was funny the first time around, it should have stuck to that.

Good jokes, bad jokes, offensive jokes, or any other kind of joke they all come from the same place. There's no need to justify a joke, be it sexist, racist or what have you. You don't have to like it and it's okay to feel the joke is "inexcusable", but no one should have to apologize for attempting a joke.

Posted by: Daniel at June 17, 2009 4:49 AM

Call me a feminazi, but I can't stand sex jokes about women who aren't prostitutes or strippers.

I won't call you a feminazi, but i will say that your words hold a RIDICULOUS double standard. Does the fact that a joke is about a stripper or prostitute not make it sexist?????????? No...it just makes it an "easy target" joke. Whore or stripper, they are still women.

Now that I've said that...Kayla, everyone, it's a fucking joke. I could call your mother a dirty, wooden-spoon-fucking twat if I presented it in a humorous fashion.

All this whole spin had been is the nothing more than the furthering of the pussification of america.

Does no one remember the days of Richard Prior, Lenny Bruce, Dice Clay, Kinison...come the fuck on. I never thought I would say that my fellow coountrymen are bigger pussies now than they were 15-20 years ago. I'm moving to fucking Europe where they have a sense of humor....or to Canada where they ...have.... ummm.... bacon?

Posted by: PissBoy at June 17, 2009 8:16 AM

The point of these jokes was not that "ha ha all women are sluts" or even "ha ha Palin's daughter's a slut"--they were simply absurdist observations based on facts that ended up in the news. That's the point of a joke--take something and reduce it to absurdity, as if meeting A-Rod for a few minutes would cause Bristol (and I think it's obvious that in making the joke Letterman was referring to Bristol as that was the daughter who got knocked up in high school despite having a mother who is a preachy super-Christian self-righteous governor whackjob) to catch preggers as they say. Yes, it's unfortunate for Bristol but guess what, her mother was the one that thought it would be a good idea to accept the nomination for VP and proceed to show the world what a dim bulb and vicious person she was. Making yourself a public figure means that your whole family gets exposed (this is why Obama's wife wasn't thrilled with him going into politics). There's no avoiding it, and while Bristol never did anything bad to anyone (probably) that's just a casualty of being part of a spotlight family. Sarah made that choice.

But it isn't sexist, any more than it is sexist to assume that A-Rod would have such an uncontrollable libido that he'd have to knock up a girl within minutes of meeting her. It's just ridiculousness, which is where any humor in the joke comes from. If you don't find it funny, that's fine--but at least understand where the humor is intended.

As for why the Palin dislike, it largely stems from the nastiness of this woman's attacks during the campaign, as well as her comical insistence that she was fully qualified in areas in which she was well out of her depth--the best example being the absurd argument that she had foreign polciy experience since her state is so close to Russia. Her hypocritical preening about abstinence and traditionalism and the use of her family as convenient props while it was clear that they were not practicing what she was preaching only intensified this--and a lot of people didn't like how the failures of her abstinence preaching would mean one thing for a poor single mother without resources versus Bristol, who at least had a millionaire family to support her and her kid (while the Palins conducted a smear campaign against the kid's father--great family values there!). You don't have to like anything Obama's doing to find Sarah Palin distasteful--it's not a zero sum game.

Posted by: Bd at June 17, 2009 8:52 AM

apologize to holocaust deniers

Is this the new right-wing trope about Obama? You'll have to forgive me my ignorance, as I don't employ the passive media for my newsgathering. I do know he stood up in a Muslim country and said, "Denying that fact (the Holocaust) is baseless, ignorant, and hateful."

Posted by: sansho1 at June 17, 2009 8:52 AM

"I won't call you a feminazi, but i will say that your words hold a RIDICULOUS double standard. Does the fact that a joke is about a stripper or prostitute not make it sexist?????????? No...it just makes it an "easy target" joke. Whore or stripper, they are still women."

Yeah, I agree. I was actually hesitant to make an exception for strippers and prostitutes but then I decided to keep it in there to see how you lot would react.

Bd - you didn't have to explain the joke. I understand the idea that he based the joke off of what has appeared in the media (Bristol's teenage pregnancy). Yeah the joke stemmed from fact.

Sexism doesn't come from random shit. It doesn't just land out of thin air. But from where I stand a teenage girl who got knocked up for whatever reason doesn't automatically constitute a joke about sexual frivolousness. Honestly, I wouldn't have been so bothered by the joke if Bristol was known to be the town slut. Then it would have stemmed from more truth. But to take a girl who has found herself to be a young mother in public eye and say she's suit to be fodder for the next lame ass sexist joke is outlandish.

I'm sorry. But the whole "Hey! It's JUST A JOKE!!" defense is fucking lame.

The shit I find humorous is clever and has truth to it. Sexist jokes about a girl who had sex with her boyfriend which ended in pregnancy isn't even necessary or interesting in the 21st century.

Posted by: kayla at June 17, 2009 9:13 AM

"Sexist jokes about a girl who had sex with her boyfriend which ended in pregnancy isn't even necessary or interesting in the 21st century."

That's not what the joke is about. The joke is about the whole damn family and the media circus it became...all with Palin's smirking, winking approval. If you can't see why it's hilarious (in a very sad way) that a woman who preaches abstinence had a daughter who, clearly, didn't feel the same way, then you're just being obtuse. It's called schadenfreude and, yes, it feels great.

As to Sasha and Malia, mark my words - those girls will be squeaky fucking clean until their grave, just like their mother, just like their grandmother. Why? Because they're black and they know that whatever they do wrong will get much harsher treatment than what a white girl does wrong. Add ten years to one of their lives and mix in a teen pregnancy with a self-identified "fucking gangsta" and what do you get? Hillary as the candidate (which is what I wanted, but not for that reason). Obama NEVER would've been able to spin that as a "family matter" with any success and I think we all know that.

BD is right - there are many, many distasteful things about Palin that have nothing to do with her hair, clothing, or makeup. It's not sexist to call a woman out for trading on her sexual appeal, ESPECIALLY when said woman is not a friend to women in general. The "jus' jellus" defense is the last resort of people who haven't a leg to stand on.

So, for those of you who point out what seems like rabid Palin-hatred, you're right. I despise the woman not because she's a woman and not because she's so gosh-darn cute, but because she had the brass balls to attempt to manipulate women into thinking a vote for her was a vote for feminism and an advance in women's history. Bitch, PLEASE. You think we've waited this long to vote the likes of you into office?

Posted by: samantha t at June 17, 2009 10:18 AM

bd is on the money, and samantha is spot on too. Palin is virtually incompetent in every aspect of her life, except to the ability to opportunistically manipulate people and situations. She is actually a marvelous Iago looking for the right Othello.

Her vicious attack originated from her realization that Letterman, in his own puppy dog way, outed her. She could not, can not, manage her own family to a successful outcome. He brought this to the surface in public and she is outraged. Now she wants to transfer the responsibility for her failure to him, and make it his fault. "You told the nasty joke, you shameless man. She what you are doing to innocent daughters. How can I be expected to raise a virtuous child in an environment where someone like you is on television?"

Posted by: Mr Fnortner at June 17, 2009 10:51 AM

"That's not what the joke is about. The joke is about the whole damn family and the media circus it became...all with Palin's smirking, winking approval. If you can't see why it's hilarious (in a very sad way) that a woman who preaches abstinence had a daughter who, clearly, didn't feel the same way, then you're just being obtuse. It's called schadenfreude and, yes, it feels great.

As to Sasha and Malia, mark my words - those girls will be squeaky fucking clean until their grave, just like their mother, just like their grandmother. Why? Because they're black and they know that whatever they do wrong will get much harsher treatment than what a white girl does wrong. Add ten years to one of their lives and mix in a teen pregnancy with a self-identified "fucking gangsta" and what do you get? Hillary as the candidate (which is what I wanted, but not for that reason). Obama NEVER would've been able to spin that as a "family matter" with any success and I think we all know that. "

- Samantha T

I call bullshit on this. If the joke wasn't a sex joke and was instead about media treatment and the irony of Palin with a pregnant daughter then Letterman wouldn't have made a sex joke.

I mean, c'mon. And it's not that funny that Palin's daughter went against the abstinence thing because:

1. Palin is a fake ass politician
2. Her daughter is a teenager
3. It's 2009

This is common as hell. And boring. Resulting in a joke that could have been about something insightful and not offensive but became a lazy, sexist, and lame attempt at humour.

And this crap about Malia and Sascha being sweet and innocent because they're black is the dumbest most backward racist shit I've heard in a while.

If they end up being upstanding girls it's because they have awesome parents.

And who cares if Palin is awful? Yeah, she's milking this for as much airtime as possible. But my mind never goes torward sex and sluttiness and wayward vaginas because her awfulness (as samantha t and Mr Fnortner so accurately pointed out) has NOTHING to do with all that. And to force sex jokes into the equation isn't even necessary. It's Sarah Palin. The lady who was pushed on us as a possible leader of our country who can't even do a basic Couric interview. Do we really need to get into sexism to make that shit funny?

Posted by: kayla at June 18, 2009 10:51 AM

DAVID LETTERMAN'S HATE, ETC. !

David Letterman's hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
Speaking of anti-Semitism, it's Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who've gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
Wrong! It's the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that'll outdo even Hitler's by stating that "Judah hath dealt treacherously" and "the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this" and asks "Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?"
Haven't evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and persons perceived to be Jewish? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard and Kathy Griffin) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin's continuing "crucifixion"!
While David, Sandra, and Kathy are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
(For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in "Separation of Raunch and State" and "Bible Verses Obama Avoids.")

Posted by: Sophie at June 22, 2009 1:30 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time