web
counter
 

61 Percent of America Are Idiots

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (76)



creationdad.jpg

You folks heard about Creation, the film about the creation of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, starring Paul Bettany and real-life wife Jennifer Connelly? No? Well, of course you haven’t. You live in America, and here, Darwin is the goddamn devil.

Creation, which played to decidedly mixed-to-bad reviews at TIFF this past week, opens in Britain this week. But not in America. It hasn’t found an American distributor, yet. Why? Because only 39 percent of Americans believe in the theory of evolution.

Are you fucking serious? You have got to be shitting me. Right? Right?

Nope. Totally true.

When my high school biology teacher, 15 years ago, nearly got fired every single year for teaching evolution, I thought it was just a Bible Belt thing. Apparently, it was an American thing.

Anyway, the movie explores Darwin’s crisis of faith, as he was writing On the Origin of Species. Darwin’s wife (Jennifer Connelly) was a devout Christian. And while Darwin may have lost his faith in the end, his wife supposedly finds a way to blend her faith with science. My guess is that her resolution won’t sit very well with American filmgoers, who prefer black and white (although, mostly white) and never shades of grey when it comes to religion. It’s much easier to demonize Darwin as a heathenistic non-believer.

Here’s the trailer. It does look dull to treacly, so maybe that’s the real reason why it hasn’t gotten American distribution.

Nah. It’s the wingnuts.









Priest Casting News | The Five Best Shows Never to Get an Emmy Nomination













Comments

I AM NOT A MONKEY!!!

*whips out red pen and highlighter for some serious Good Book reflection*

Try to tell me I'm some damned dirty ape. I'll show you with a 2,000 year old zinger from this here pillar of paperbound truth.

*skimming*

*skimming*

Hmmm. Nothing here. Guess I am a monkey. Whoops! Threw shit in your face. My bad. Just getting adjusted.

Posted by: Kballs at September 21, 2009 11:38 AM

So, 61% of Americans don't believe in the theory of evolution. My husband is a college professor. Let me tell you what most of his students know (or not).

Most cannot find the USA on a map of the world, despite the fact that it is MARKED ON THE MAP.

Most cannot name or find the world's big oceans despite the fact that they are MARKED ON THE MAP.

Most cannot name the first president of the USA.

These are college students.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 21, 2009 11:39 AM

I'd be happy to be decended from an ape.

Unfortunately, it's more likely that we're all decended from centipedes.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 21, 2009 11:42 AM

Sounds like you're talking out of someone's ass, BWeaves.

Posted by: DoctorControversy at September 21, 2009 11:46 AM

BWeaves speaks the truth. I have a friend who is a professor who had several students ask how to make the Roman numeral II.

The fact that people can't see any truth in evolution doesn't surprise me at all. Even if you can't get past the apes/human connection, you damned well better believe that evolution exists because we have evidence. HELLO, fossil record anyone?

Posted by: Melody at September 21, 2009 11:46 AM

How can you expect people in America to "believe" in evolution when it is not taught in schools. Even if it is taught, it is extremely broad and surprisingly devoid of facts and scientific evidence. I didn't really learn the principals of evolutionary theory until I educated myself by extensive reading on the subject outside of school.

Posted by: androstarr at September 21, 2009 11:46 AM

I think the lack of a distributor may have more to do with whether the film itself is marketable--that is, flashy, star-ridden, but mainly able to fill theater seats--than any controversy over the subject. After all, there's no shortage of distributors willing to put out controversial films (otherwise Michael Moore would be showing his documentaries to people in his basement for $5 a pop). More likely, this film isn't "commercial enough."

Doesn't dispute the fact that most people are idiots though.

As for the 61% who don't believe evolution, I'll wager that has less to do with creationist conviction and more to do with people not knowing much about a lot of things. How many Americans know where their home state is on a map?

Posted by: Bd at September 21, 2009 11:53 AM

BWeaves, technically we're not descended from apes, right? We share a common ancestor, from which the two species diverged. This is where the argument drives me to pound my head into a wall. Everybody loves them some science when it gives them plasma TVs and microwave popcorn, but challenge the Bible and all of a sudden it's "Not so fast..hold up that stem cell research..." etc.

Posted by: mrcreosote at September 21, 2009 12:05 PM

My father was a minister for many years, but what surprised me the most was that he would constantly have us watch all those science shows on PBS every time they came on. I can remember him writing his sermons at the dinner table and watching PBS at the same time. I don’t believe he was a hypocrite, I just believe he was trying to feed his soul and his mind.

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 21, 2009 12:06 PM

I don't know why the two theories should be incompatible. Wouldn't an all-wise, all-powerful God have the foresight and the ability to instill in His creation a mechanism to adapt and evolve to meet changing environments and conditions?

I mean, presuming there's a God. That's what the argument is really about.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at September 21, 2009 12:13 PM

I recall the evolution lesson several times in the science classes in my public schooling, including high school biology and even earlier. I was in the Bible Belt as well. I do not recall any serious controversy about its teaching, although I do remember my first high school biology teacher's prefacing the lesson with some sort of preemptive defense of its validity despite what any of us might have been taught in church.

Anyway, that poll might not be quite as troubling as it would seem. 36 percent neither believe nor disbelieve in evolution, and that agnostic position of admitting ignorance at least seems respectable to me. We might have a bunch of people who don't know, but at least many of those people aren't afraid to admit they don't know.

Hell, I myself am not even sure that saying I "believe" in evolution is the correct wording, so that poll might have given me pause. Throwing in the word "believe" with scientific matters seems dangerous. Science doesn't require "belief." I support the theory as the best explanation for the evidence at hand. Science always leaves the door open for improvement of our explanations based on evidence that might be discovered later. As far as I'm concerned, that is the entire difference between science and revealed religion: openness to intellectual scrutiny.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at September 21, 2009 12:14 PM

That still shot on the YouTube vid looks eerily like a skinnier version of me. It's creepy. And gross.

I believe I'm going to evolve into Paul Bettany. Hopefully I'll evolve with a better taste in women.

Posted by: ChristianH at September 21, 2009 12:30 PM

I think the biggest problem in the USA is that the schools won't let the teachers teach the Theory of Evolution, so generations grow up ignorant of what it really says, and what survival of the fittest means. They get it all wrong and think that it has to be Evolution or the Bible, with no middle ground of being able to believe in science and have faith at the same time.

The Bible, on the very first page has two completely different creation stories, with two completely different writing styles. It was like the writer couldn't make up their mind which one to put in, so they put them both in. As a consequence, it just becomes a "here's how my mom and dad explained it to me, but I'm not sure who was right."

Posted by: BWeaves at September 21, 2009 12:34 PM

God created evolution.

Now get back to work.

Posted by: mograph at September 21, 2009 12:53 PM

It's very sad that so many people insist on using the Bible as a literal, scientific text. When they do that, they miss out on the life lessons that can be learned, the crazy stories, and the critical thinking skills that are developed when one ponders an allegorical tale and tries to figure out the message. Religion and science are not mutually exclusive. The mistake comes in when people use religion to determine how we are here and not why we are here.

I actually had no opinion on the theory of evolution until I became an adult. In school we learned the barest bit about evolution and natural selection. I had heard of the theory of creation, but I was smart enough to know that the world did not come about in seven days - the Genesis is allegorical. It was only when I became an adult and looked into the theory myself and what the Church thinks about it that I developed my own opinion.

Posted by: stardust savant at September 21, 2009 12:56 PM

Wait a minute. Where does the whole stork thing fit in?

Posted by: Cindy at September 21, 2009 1:03 PM

That depends Cindy. In my wife's school they taught that the birth control pill kills babies. So, If you believe in that kind of thing, I suppose the pill would also kill storks.

Posted by: admin at September 21, 2009 1:09 PM

That is so weird about America and evolution. I went to school in Honduras and Venezuela, two fiercely Catholic countries, and never, EVER did I hear any debate about whether evolution should be taught in schools. We just learned it. No one gave a damn. And this was 10 years ago.

Posted by: figgy at September 21, 2009 1:12 PM

I can never tell Admin, if it's the pill that kills storks, or the rough sex.

Posted by: mrcreosote at September 21, 2009 1:13 PM

We have not descended from apes, we ARE apes. It's just that we're the smartest hairless primates on the planet. We humans think we are SO superior.. but when you think about it, none of it is going to matter when the asteroid hits, or Global Warming turns the planet into Waterworld and natural selection weeds out those of us who are not gilled (Kevin Costner) or pirates (Dennis Hopper) or whoever else was in that so-called movie.

Posted by: Tweeter and the Monkey Man at September 21, 2009 1:17 PM

'...it hasn't found an American distributor...because on 39 percent of Americans believe in the theory of evolution.'

Stop, just, just stop.

This isn't funny, not in any way.

Not in a bitchy way.

Not in a snarky way.

Not in an ironic way.

Not in a smarmy way.

Not in any way.

If your goal is to drive the country further apart and make it harder for compromise on any political issue to be reached, then bra-FUCKING-vo, you've accomplished what you set out to do.

I get that you probably have to pound out a set number of words per day to keep your pathetic job on this shithole of a website, and that certainly hasn't stopped you from out and out lying before, but really, if this movie didn't have Jennifer Connelly, OMG BOOBIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you wouldn't even mention it.

Posted by: Fappy McFapper at September 21, 2009 1:39 PM

Well then I have to put my foot down. We can't be killing birds all willy-nilly.

Posted by: Cindy at September 21, 2009 1:40 PM

Figgy, Catholics don't really have a problem with evolution, or science in general. I guess they learned their lesson with Galileo.

It's the evangelicals with their belief in the Bible as the Literal Truth as Written (in English translated from the Latin translated from the Greek translated from the Aramaic), who cause problems. Though not so much here in California.

I'm with DarthCorleone in that the word "belief" should never be associated with a scientific theory. The very fact that they asked people to express a belief already biases the results.

Anyway this whole debate just makes me mad. I'm going to go beat up on some unborn fetuses or whatever it is we godless heathens do.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at September 21, 2009 1:43 PM

Figgy - that's because it's really the Christian Right fundies who are at fault here, not Catholics. Mainstream Catholics have managed to reconcile the ol' creationism/evolution thing.

Posted by: samantha t at September 21, 2009 1:44 PM

AHEM!

If I recall correctly I broke this news last week in Pajiba Love and was phoo-phooed into submission by a whole fucking lot of y'all.

SEE!
SEE!!!
I was RIGHT!

'Tone down the outrage, it is a BS article in the Telegraph UK, Gallup polls are stoopid, yadda yadda yadda,'
My left tit!
I AM OUTRAGED.
AND I WAS RIGHT!

Also, Tweeter is right, We are not descended from apes, we are distant cousins to apes. We are descended from a common ancestor.
Thank Godopus for that minor in Anthropology. I knew I would use it someday.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 21, 2009 1:45 PM

Didn't we address this on a Pajiba Love a couple weeks ago? Shame on Rowles for perpetrating the idea that this film can't secure a distributor due to hostility toward the theory of evolution (talk about intellectually dishonest, though he may claim it was tongue-in-cheek)

Don't quote me the stupid stats on belief in evolution. 60% of people that get asked these questions are fucking morons. I think they are selecting from the same population that gets on Leno's Jaywalking bit. Inferring from those statistics is as meaningful as watching Jay Leno.

This movie isn't getting distributed because it isn't marketable because nobody, especially people like me who believe in evolution, would go and see this.

And furthermore, does anyone seriously feel like the theory of evolution, in society or in school, is in any way under threat? It was a unit in my High School biology class, it is taught in our public school system and our Catholic schools, it is taught in college. These days it's the Creationists who get taken to court and have their theory thrown out of the classroom (as it should be; religion has no place in math & science classes, although I wish teachers were more comfortable talking about it- impartially- in history and literature classes) because it is Creationism that is the exception, the odd case that crops up and gets media attention as it is addressed.

Does anyone really feel that evolution is under attack? Anyone graduate high school in the last 20 years and have this as an issue in their school? Because there actually are meaningful things you could spend your time advocating for in the area of education reform, and getting your panties in a twist over evolution seems like one of the dumbest, Rush Limbaugh-esque things to get agitated about.

Posted by: Yossarian at September 21, 2009 1:47 PM

Excuse me ladies but before you all get to talking about men’s stuff I’ll have the pastrami on rye.

Posted by: Guess Who! at September 21, 2009 1:55 PM

Yossarian: I think that depends on where you live in the country. I grew up in Massachusetts and this shit wouldn't fly there (and I'm not even from an enlightened part of the state). Mississippi, however? I'm sure there are educated parents there who think the creationism crowd is full of shit, but they're in the minority.

I actually can't believe this is a debate. It bums me out enormously.

Posted by: samantha t at September 21, 2009 1:57 PM

*Raises Hand*

I just wanted to say, on another note: When I was in high school I, on one of my tests, was asked to describe the big bang theory. Me, naturally being lazy, didn't feel like going in depth on my answer, so I wrote, "God yelled bang and the universe was created." Funny right? I thought so. That is until I got my test back and saw that the answer was marked correct. Why? Because they couldn't go against my religious beliefs. WEIRD.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 21, 2009 2:06 PM

I actually can't believe this is a debate. It bums me out enormously.

Then don't believe it. And don't let your derisive opinion of Mississippi and your imagination lead to jump to conclusions. Even in the South the majority viewpoint of teaching evolution and not teaching Creationism will hold. Now, that doesn't mean the schools are turning out reasoned, intelligent 18-year-olds who can articulate and support the theory of evolution, but then again the graduation rate is barely above 50% and most of these kids don't know basic math or geography so asking them to understand the workings of natural selection is a bit much.

People are stupid, but this is not the issue.

Posted by: Yossarian at September 21, 2009 2:07 PM

DeistBrawler:

That is awesome.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 21, 2009 2:16 PM

I teach a couple of college classes. In my lectures, evolution comes up. I had one student who was married to an Evangelical preacher who tried to debate me.

It escalated and I eventually told her: "I don't teach in your church, please do not preach in my classroom."

*feels the need to go watch Bill Hicks now*

Posted by: WigWam at September 21, 2009 2:31 PM

I graduated from high school in Kentucky in the late 90s, and I can tell you that my h.s. biology teacher introduced the topic of evolution with a hefty disclaimer that it was "only a theory" and not one that she agreed with. It didn't really encourage any of us towards critical thinking.

Also, the superintendent of schools in the county next to mine got in trouble for gluing together the pages of science textbooks that mentioned the Big Bang Theory.

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at September 21, 2009 2:51 PM

I was very happy that today in Biology I had a 50 minute lecture on evolution, and no one blinked an eye.

Posted by: Victor at September 21, 2009 3:00 PM

"And don't let your derisive opinion of Mississippi and your imagination lead to jump to conclusions."

I don't really see this as my "opinion" or "imagination" ; - the MS legislature has actively attempted to get creationism recognized as legitimate in public schools. I suppose I'm being unfair by imputing that to MS residents (whom I clarified are not uniformly ignorant), but the residents are, after all, responsible for voting these crazies in.

I don't think it's some fiction that this kind of thinking is far more prevalent in the South than pretty much anywhere else in the country. I recognize that for people of my ilk it's a luxury to live in a region where you can presume evolution will get treated as fact rather than some competing "theory".

Posted by: samantha t at September 21, 2009 3:03 PM

"Even in the South the majority viewpoint of teaching evolution and not teaching Creationism will hold."

So you're comfortable with a slender - not overwhelming - majority not teaching creationism? I'm not. These are future workers and voters we're talking about here.

Posted by: samantha t at September 21, 2009 3:07 PM

Trust me youngun's... if Texans have their way (and when it comes to textbooks they usually do) God is gonna be a much bigger part of your child's science curriculum than any of us should be willing to tolerate. Y'see, Texas is a very large state and buys a whole lotta textbooks, so the people who publish textbooks try and keep the Texas State Board of Education happy. Keeping the Board happy currently entails playing down evolution and trumping up the God angle. The problem for the rest of the country? These Board approved textbooks are going to used all over the country.
I say this as a firm believer in God... CALL YOUR STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION AND PROTEST THIS BULLSHIT PROPAGANDA EFFORT! Make sure you look over your child's science textbook and make sure they aren't trying to keep your kid ignorant regarding scientific facts that support evolution.

Posted by: Spender at September 21, 2009 3:23 PM

samantha

My problem all along is with people who speak as if evolution is the minority opinion and it is under fire from the Creationists. I just don't get this need for alarmist reactions and persecution complexes about how the whole world is going to hell in a handbasket (those tactics sound like the province of the other side of the argument).

I don't deny that there are some places in Mississippi where local school boards have attempted to get "intelligent design" into the classroom. My point is: They lost. They are loosing and they will lose. Evolution is accepted in the scientific and academic communities. It's the mainstream and the majority. Evolution is taught in classrooms all around the country. They is no need to get worked up repeating anecdotes about rouge teachers in backwater school districts who attempted to teach Creationism and got shot down or quoting meaningless statistics. An ounce of intellectual curiosity and an internet connection is all you need. This isn't the eighteenth century.

Most people aren't educated enough to articulate Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. But the problem isn't that the religion is interfering with science in public schools, it is that public schools and parents are failing, miserably, at educating those kids.

All this sound and fury about religion stepping on educations toes misses the real point.

Posted by: Yossarian at September 21, 2009 3:30 PM

when i read that,i'm happy to be an European woman

Posted by: carrie at September 21, 2009 3:41 PM

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 21, 2009 4:19 PM

Lindsey with an 'e'
That scares me...no...really.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 21, 2009 4:32 PM

It should.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 21, 2009 4:55 PM

HELLO, fossil record anyone?

Posted by: Melody at September 21, 2009 11:46 AM
--------------------------------------------------
YOU LIE!

Posted by: Bible McGee at September 21, 2009 5:02 PM

Fossils were scattered on the Earth by Satan, to mislead us. Keep up, will ya?

Posted by: MM at September 21, 2009 5:04 PM

I'm glad that although I grew up in a conservative county, my hometown was filled with liberal hippies. I remember reading Genesis and Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind, and not comparing the two but understanding species development as it fit into both views.

Posted by: DoubleH at September 21, 2009 5:07 PM

"Opiate" feels a little too elegant and sophisticated in the old adage; perhaps "Meth" instead.

Posted by: laredo at September 21, 2009 5:46 PM

I went to a Jesuit high school, and they relegated creation stories to religious studies, and evolution to the science classes. The smart ones know fact from fantasy. The problem is the same here as it is with many issues: There are simply too many stupid people.

Posted by: logar at September 21, 2009 6:00 PM

What the hell? I went to a Midwestern/Appalachian Catholic school and was taught the theory of evolution in the 7th grade. (By the woman who'd later teach some of my science and religion classes in high school, no less.) She made it sound idiotic to not believe that at least some of it was true.

Eh, I'll probably see the damn movie if it ever becomes available in America. Paul Bettany's in it with weird hair. That's all I ever need to know.

Posted by: Annie UhOh at September 21, 2009 6:13 PM

You know, I actually consider belief in Creationism to be an example of Natural Selection at work.
I mean, think about it. Natural history is littered with the remains of long died out species that were unable to adapt to their changing environment. If you can't roll with the changes, take your rightful place in the fossil record and the rest of us will move on.
It is survival of the most able to adapt, and that goes for ability to adapt to new information too. The knuckle draggers will not win in the end.

/end preach to choir

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 21, 2009 6:29 PM

I'm going to go beat up on some unborn fetuses or whatever it is we godless heathens do.

We also have the gay.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 21, 2009 6:33 PM

logar,

God bless the the Jesuits. Stormtroopers of God, they are and don't fuck with them, but they know their shit.

Posted by: WigWam at September 21, 2009 6:50 PM

I'm a proud, card-carrying atheist in the mould of Dawkins (yes, I'm quite happily that anti-religion and utterly baffled by faith which seems to me misguided at best), the American (for which read, US) cultural obsession with religion and all the intellectual, political and other social normative baggage it brings seems incredibly odd to me as an Australian.

Religion is almost completely separate from education and politics here in Australia. The one person in our entire parliament elected on a pro-religion ticket is going to lose his Senate seat in a year because he's seen as nothing more than a religious fruitcake who envisions himself as a spoiler of legislation and imposer of fringe morals.

It's the same in education, no religion at all in public schools and in schools such as the Catholic school I send my daughter to (best facilities, best curriculum, best teachers) in spite of my atheist views, even there it's very low key and taught largely as ethics rather than theology.

I think there's more to be said, but I'll shut up now.

Posted by: trib at September 21, 2009 6:53 PM

Yossarian, I don't know where you live, but here in Southwest Missouri, teaching the the theory of evolution is definitely under attack. I remember it being introduced for like, a minute in school, and it was always presented as, "SOME people believe that we evolved..." essentially saying, that's whats SOME people believe but we here in the Bible Belt know the truth...and it's only gotten worse since then, not better. THIS YEAR the school board attempted to get a Bible class put in our public school and people are constantly protesting their children being "forced" to learn the blasphemy of evolution...trust me, it is a problem in certain areas of the country. A lot of people here home school based almost solely on the fact that they don't want their kids taught evolution.

Posted by: tinmo at September 21, 2009 7:07 PM

The knuckle draggers will not win in the end.

Except that they're outbreeding everyone else.

Posted by: Lauren at September 21, 2009 7:36 PM

I encourage you to check out this website (if you want to bust your ribs from laughing and then cry until you drown in your own tears):

Creation Science Fair

Don't miss Middle School Level
1st Place: "Life Doesn't Come From Non-Life"

Posted by: MM at September 21, 2009 7:37 PM

Again, this is my point:

"A lot of people here home school based almost solely on the fact that they don't want their kids taught evolution."

In Southwest Missouri and everywhere else evolution is taught in American public schools. Fringe groups try to inject religion and they are defeated. Parents that object to sound scientific theory being taught in public schools need to remove their children from public schools to avoid it. Unless you want to say that these parents don't have the right to raise their own children if you disagree with their beliefs (and trust me, you don't want to make that argument no matter how tempting it is to look down on these people) I fail to see what the problem is.

Evolution is not under attack. Many religions accept and support teaching of evolution. Catholic schools teach evolution. So what is with all the pro-atheist rah-rah and hostility?

"I'm going to go beat up on some unborn fetuses or whatever it is we godless heathens do."

Really? And I suppose the members of the Pajiba community who believe in god are going to go burn some science books and throw rocks at the weird kids. You do realize you are being just as small minded as the people you are criticizing, right?

Posted by: Yossarian at September 21, 2009 7:38 PM

The Creationists and those who support evolution have it all wrong. We're all just figments of some kid's imagination, floating along in his snow globe.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at September 21, 2009 7:47 PM

Don't even get me started on Steve fu*king Fielding.

Posted by: Peter G at September 21, 2009 8:01 PM

Yossarian: But it's only "taught" in the loosest sense of the word. It's basically MENTIONED, at best, when they get to that chapter in the textbook, and isn't given any real in-depth discussion or consideration. And the majority of teachers make it pretty clear that it's understood that "we" don't really believe in it. There is also a movement here to get it stricken from textbooks entirely.

And there is a HUGE difference between Catholics and Southern Baptists, and there are very few Catholics in my neck of the woods, so the fact that it may have been embraced by the Catholic faith isn't really relevant in areas where evangelicals/fundamentalists are the majority.

Posted by: tinmo at September 21, 2009 8:47 PM

"Unless you want to say that these parents don't have the right to raise their own children if you disagree with their beliefs (and trust me, you don't want to make that argument no matter how tempting it is to look down on these people) I fail to see what the problem is."

As a family law practitioner, I'd say that parents who teach their children their "beliefs" to the exclusion of legitimate science are engaging in educational neglect, but I digress.

The problem is that we're talking about children - children whose parents and teachers are, likely, their entire world and may not have the wherewithall to look elsewhere for a proper education. Public schooling is, in part, a corrective for what's lacking at home and it's extraordinarily irresponsible to teach a well-established scientific FACT as a mere "theory".

I do think this is a travesty and an outrage, though you seem to think it's no big deal. I actually worry about children being brought up under these circumstances as I think they're being willfully deprived of fundamental knowledge, even though my own children and my children's friends will experience nothing of the sort.

I'm loving the Catholic shout-outs. I'm a practicing RC and am constantly trying to distinguish us from the crazies.

Posted by: samantha t at September 21, 2009 9:47 PM

MM: I find this entry far more disturbing than your excellent example:

2001 Prize Winners:
Elementary School Level

Cassidy Turnbull and her uncle, Steve, who is not a monkey according to Cassidy's research. 1st Place: "My Uncle Is A Man Named Steve (Not A Monkey)"
Cassidy Turnbull (grade 5) presented her uncle, Steve. She also showed photographs of monkeys and invited fairgoers to note the differences between her uncle and the monkeys. She tried to feed her uncle bananas, but he declined to eat them. Cassidy has conclusively shown that her uncle is no monkey.

Um...

Posted by: tinmo at September 21, 2009 9:58 PM

tinmo,

Oh, believe me, I laughed HARD at the monkey one. I first saw this website a long time ago and could.not.stop.laughing.

I just pointed out the "no life from non-life" one because it purports to contain some actual pseudo-science. "I put a charcoal briquet in a jar of water and left it in the sun. It didn't turn into life. Therefore the whole 'scientific' theory of how life began on this planet is wrong."

Back to the monkeys, have you seen any of the Kirk Cameron crazy come-to-Jesus videos? There's one in which he and his "co-host" (some other insane dude) take a chimp to lunch. They literally go to a restaurant with a monkey, and then demonstrate how he doesn't use the silverware and can't read the menu as proof that he's a lower form of life which could never have evolved into humans. It's... surreal.

I realize it may seem like I'm obsessed with this "creation science" stuff, but really a friend of mine just loves to send me random shit like the science fair site and the Kirk Cameron stuff. ("Yeah, sure, a friend... right...") And I can't resist reading/watching. And then I laugh for a while. And then I think about it. These people actually exist. And then the laughter turns to tears.

Posted by: MM at September 21, 2009 10:22 PM

MM:

I haven't seen the chimp/Kirk Cameron thing, but I can totally imagine it, because I saw some infomercial/conversion commercial type thing (probably a segment of the thing you're talking about, where he goes around "witnessing" to people) with him and I was blown away. I grew up in a Southern Baptist church, and I mean, GREW UP IN, hardcore, as in, church was an integral part of our daily lives, and it's really hard for me to reconcile those beliefs with how I view the world today...I guess you could say I'm agnostic, as I'm not really sure what the hell is going on, but I'm damn sure I'm not buying what I've been sold since childhood...

Posted by: tinmo at September 21, 2009 10:42 PM

samantha t

This is getting further away from my original point, but...

I'd say that parents who teach their children their "beliefs" to the exclusion of legitimate science are engaging in educational neglect

Here's the problem with that. Why can't a religious person make the same claim: that people who raise their kids without religion are engaging of spiritual neglect? If someone even suggested that atheist parents should have their kids taken away because of neglect people would lose their shit. You can't start getting carried away with your own beliefs.

Public schooling is, in part, a corrective for what's lacking at home

Again, that is a problematic way of thinking. In fact, it is the same logic that those evil Southern Baptists are employing when they try to inject religion into the classroom. You don't get to editorialize. You don't get to go off book. Stick to the script, teach the lesson, but don't try to wage a war for hearts and minds in the classroom. It only leads down a slippery, ugly slope.

It's not that I think this is "no big deal" because I agree with you that it is unfortunate and it much worse when it effects children. I just disagree with the focus of all the outrage. Who are you guys really mad at here? What are you outraged about? Because it really seems like everybody wants to rail against religion in general and fundamentalists in particular as if they are somehow being oppressed. I also question the point of the original blog post which seems lazy and sloppy at best, and a cheap ploy to manufacture controversy and drive page hits at worst.

Creationism is not the mainstream in America. It is marginalized and it is not representative of America or the majority of religious people in America. It doesn't have any significant stronghold in our schools (and to suggest it is controlling Hollywood is laughable). And I really doubt it is negatively impacting the lives of the young women attending liberal arts colleges who are making all these comments. There are serious problems with these issues elsewhere in this world, but yours are not those problems.

Posted by: Yossarian at September 21, 2009 11:11 PM

you can't expect kids to give much credence to natural selection, since the human primate has opted out of that behaviour pattern. we've tossed out millions of years of evolutionary strategy and opted to select for all traits, all genes, regardless of fitness. We actively and with zeal seek to preserve every life and give it the chance to pass on its genes, no matter what. This is not the behaviour of a species that accepts evolution.

i'm not so sure if we are the cleverest apes, being that the results of our experiment are vast over-population, rampant syndromes, disorders and cancers, and a gluttonous locust-like consumption of everything else in the biosphere.

Posted by: idleprimate at September 21, 2009 11:37 PM

Yossarian: I will never be as eloquent as you in expressing my thoughts (and that's not sarcasm, you truly do make some great points), but I'll just say this: you are obviously not from the four-state-area (corners of Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Kansas). This is a real issue here and creates a lot of derision among its citizens. I agree with a lot of what you say, particularly regarding the failings of the public school system in general, but to say that that the religious fanatics don't "hold any significant stronghold in our schools" is laughable if you're talking about this area. You should come visit sometime and see how many people here are STILL angry about prayer being removed from our schools, and how many of those people are teachers, coaches, school board and city council members...

Posted by: tinmo at September 21, 2009 11:38 PM

The consequence of free-wheeling, no-hold barred democracy and liberty is the freedom to do as they choose, the freedom to believe what they want, and the tendency towards prosperity over all others.

That the singular percentage figure relegates a nation to idiocy by the chattering masses of pajiba blogs ignores the justification used by those 61%. Were these people using evolution in combination with divinity to make their choice?

Either way - I'll leave this blog in situ - bashing the percieved ignorants makes ya'll feel special right?

Posted by: pmac at September 21, 2009 11:58 PM

The knuckle draggers will not win in the end.

Except that they're outbreeding everyone else.


True, Lainey but:
1) whose fault is that? (says the childless 36 year old divorcee)
2) We elites will need someone to do all of the grunt work. Keep em' docile and mindless I say.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at September 22, 2009 2:14 AM

besides all this high falutin' debate about evolution, has anyone else watched this clip and thought, "yeah, i like this movie the 1st time i saw it, when it was THE PIANO!!!!"

Posted by: glittergirl at September 22, 2009 12:08 PM

Easily the best show on TV at the moment, I have to say I'm completely addicted to this show.

Posted by: Watch Big Bang Theory at January 10, 2010 8:43 AM

Mike Matusow is one of my most favorite Texas Holdem player. He's a definite winning player in my eyes.

Posted by: Reede at February 15, 2010 4:47 AM

When I first read your article I did not really understand why it might be important. But as I think about it all it becomes absolutely clear to me and I understand that you are right. Thank you for this new ideas that you have given to me. Sarah-Ann

Posted by: Sarah-Ann at October 30, 2010 9:13 AM

Ref last months ban in certain states, if i join a site like full tilt will i be penalised for doing so?

Posted by: pokertournament software at December 28, 2010 10:10 AM

I wonder what 23 year old David Vamplew will do next, after winning the comp in London he is bound to go to the USA and win some of the bigger competitons

Posted by: freeroll pokertournaments at December 28, 2010 12:33 PM

I think that Phil Galfond is a great role model to have in poker. Not only is he one of the top players in the world, but he is great at stuff like bankroll management, game selection, avoiding tilt and keeping a level head with out fail which are a massivly relevant part of the game.

Posted by: teachme poker at December 28, 2010 12:54 PM

Aw, it was an incredibly attractive blog post. In thought I'd really like to put in writing similar to this in addition – taking time as well as actual work to create a very good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate much and for no reason seem to get something finished.

Posted by: Mac nick at January 23, 2011 12:12 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time