web
counter
 

Daisy, Daisy Give Me Your Answer Do

By Cindy Davis | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (49)



Carey-Mulligan-4.jpg

I’m not sure what to make of the idea that Baz Luhrmann is remaking The Great Gatsby. One thing is certain; the film will be beautiful, but whether he’ll be any more successful at bringing the book to life than Jack Clayton remains to be seen. It’s been many years since I saw that 1974 version and frankly I don’t remember much other than a handsome Redford, and empty Farrow and not much caring about the whole thing.

So back to the beauty - thus far Luhrmann has reportedly already sussed out his main men with Leonardo DiCaprio as Jay Gatsby, Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway and Ben Affleck as Tom Buchanan. Now, after having held court with a bevy of Hollywood It Girls (Rebecca Hall, Amanda Seyfried, Keira Knightley, Michelle Williams, Natalie Portman, Scarlett Johansson, Abbie Cornish, Blake Lively), latecomer Carey Mulligan (An Education, Never Let Me Go) has been awarded the coveted role. Now out of all those young women, other than Michelle Williams, she was probably the best choice. Mulligan’s talent clearly transcends her youth, she was simply stunning in An Education. But does this film really need redoing? Probably not. Will people go see it? Yes, and that’s the bottom line. I don’t know what the hell happened with Australia, that thing looked like a hot mess and having big stars didn’t seem to help. But with DiCaprio and Mulligan and the wealthy backdrop of this period piece, Luhrman’s version should be a big draw.

Let’s just hope Nicole stays off the billing.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Green Lantern Trailer | In Brightest Day... | Your Highness Trailer | "Magic, Motherf**cker"









Comments

Man, Australia is underrated as hell. I think it was just too old fashioned. Beautiful movie, great adventure story, cinematography straight out of an Indiana Jones movie. Even Kidman's plasticized face couldn't ruin it.

I care not one iota about a Great Gatsby movie, but it's Baz so I'll likely give it a looksy based on him and the cast alone.

Posted by: TylerDFC at November 17, 2010 9:45 AM

A) I'm really mad that Baz didn't read my mind and go with my casting which was:
Gosling-Gastby
JGL-Nick
Carey-Daisy (yay!)
and Tom Hardy-Nick

B) I want Leguizamo for Meyer Wolfsheim.

C) I've said this before but. . .is Kylie Minogue too old to play the green light at the end of Daisy's dock?

D) The Redford version is really really really good. I just rewatched. Solid work from Sam Waterston as Nick Carraway, Bruce Dern as Tom Buchanan and, particularly, Scott Wilson as George Wilson (a character I never really cottoned to in the book but found extremely absorbing in this version). Mia Farrow was a little more histrionic than I would have liked. . .but that's Farrow.

E) I think Leo is a great actor but I think he is too old, puffy, and haggard-looking to play the ever cool, suave Gatsby. Aren't he and Daisy supposed to be relatively the same age?

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 9:46 AM

bees, you nailed my main concern: Leo was born in '74, Tobey in '75, Ben in '72 and Carey... in '85 (I checked Wikipedia before I finished the post here.) And they all look their ages. I just can't see it working.

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at November 17, 2010 9:54 AM

Here's the problem with adapting The Great Gatsby: it is a long book with a whole lot happening even when it looks like nothing is happening. There is (was? it may have closed already) an Off-Broadway production running for a while where they literally acted out the entire novel, verbatim; it's 8 hours of live theater with no break. That's a whole lot of stuff to trim down for a film. I think Luhrmann is an ideal choice for capturing the beauty of the settings and the glamor of the period, but his self-editing skills are almost as suspect as Julie Taymor. He's like a kid in a candy store, and the results--even within a film--are decidedly mixed. For every gorgeous scene of explosive cabaret, there's a tiny little green fairy popping out of a bottle of Absinthe, if you catch my drift.

Posted by: Robert at November 17, 2010 9:57 AM

Agreed with your concern re editing, Robert. I'd say THAT was the problem with Australia. Well, that, and Kidman's face which was epically distracting.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:00 AM

coveredinbees makes excellent points and Ryan Gosling is amazing, but if you have to have Leo, couldn't they use Paltrow? She's perfect for the part. I mean, come on, she was born to play either Daisy Buchanan or Tracy Lord. Since I haven't completed my rewrite, I think Paltrow should be attached to this. I am open to suggestions for Dexter and Mike.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 10:02 AM

You know, the Clayton/Redford version has a LOT of Carraway voice-over which, as a book nerd, I LOVED because you got to hear some of Fitzgerald's phrasing. . .word for word. I know a film is meant to convey those phrasings visually and it's often seen as weak to rely on voice-over, but Fitzgerald's words are just too famous/unforgettable to be omitted. Now imagine them in Maguire's rasp/squeak. No. Come ON, Baz. Give me JGL. He'll bring his own vests!!!

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:04 AM

Oh, C.K. DEXTER HAAAAAVEN!!! (Marry me, Mrs. Julien)

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:06 AM

I remember watching a made-for-TV version of this (with Paul Rudd as Nick, I think..?)

Anyways, what always kills me about any film adaptation of The Great Gatsby is that since most of the characters keep their feelings & thoughts all bottled up, it becomes so overly dependent on the voice-over narration, that the actors don't do much "acting" and instead let the narration explain what they're feeling inside.

I don't know, maybe this could get it right.

Side-note: Did anyone ever read Hunter S. Thompson's The Rum Diary? It's pretty much his take on Gatsby. It's also getting a film & I'm equally as worried.

Posted by: shanmarie at November 17, 2010 10:09 AM

Kittredge is no great tower of strength Tracy. He's just a tower.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 10:10 AM

Oh yeah, Paul Rudd, Mira Sorvino as Daisy and Toby Stephens (who sets my teeth on edge) as Gatsby. What a sh*t show that was.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:14 AM

I don't think we need to worry too much about speaking the unspoken; film is a visual medium and with good quality actors you don't need words because they have FACES! Is there any way we can get Anthony Hopkins to play all of the parts? He can use one upper/lower eyelid each for Tom, Nick, Daisy and Gatsby and still have enough talent left over to do the supporting cast with his eyebrows.

That last part didn't come out right, but I'm too tired to edit and too lazy to delete.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 10:16 AM

What coveredinbees said.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 17, 2010 10:18 AM

Michelle Williams would make a good woman-who-sleeps-with-Nick-Carraway.


George Clooney should be Dexter.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2010 10:19 AM

Matt Damon as Mike?

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2010 10:22 AM

I for one am really excited about a remake of The Great Gatsby. The original is pretty stuffy and boring with the exception of the perfect Robert Redford. Other than him there's nothing really worth salvaging from the original making it a perfect candidate for remake in my book.

Second, I'm really excited about re-teaming Leonardo DiCaprio and Baz Luhrmann- leading me to wonder if this is going to be a modern re-envisioned version of Gatsby like his take on Romeo and Juliet. Either way I think it's going to be stunning.

Finally, I completely swooned yesterday when I found out that Carey Mulligan was going to be Daisy. The idea of Blake Lively in this part left such a bad taste in my mouth. I am a bit worried about the age difference between her and Leo given the story, but pairing them together fits the characters perfectly in my mind and they are both strong enough actors to pull this off.

Posted by: Valerie at November 17, 2010 10:23 AM

I'd prefer an Amanda Seyfried as Jordan Baker. . . if she can tolerate second (fifth, really) billing. How pretty would she and Carey look. . ."like silver idols weighing down their own white dresses against the singing breeze of the fans." SEE WHAT I'M SAYING ABOUT HIS WORDS?!?!?

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:24 AM

Clooney is too old now and I think Gyllenhaal (I REFUSE to look up the spelling, so if it is right I have just used up my Christmas miracle) is still to young. Matt Damon would be a good Mike. I am going to be thinking about this all day.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 10:34 AM

Oh, this is SO ricockulous. Baz Luhrmann to direct the adaptation of a book that's sensitive and subtle? Oh god, I'm not going to make any sense in this comment, purely because my loathing for Luhrmann and his flashy, shit directing and his astonishing sense of self-importance always rob me of any sort of calm or clarity I might have had. He CANNOT be allowed to make a film about proper human beings having true interactions! If he really wants to work, can't he just make some dumb fucking musical again, with, I don't know, Lady Gaga playing a knight and Robert Pattinson as a poet or whatever, singing songs by Sade and the Rolling Stones?

Also, Leonardo di Caprio is way too old, and so is Tobey Maguire. JGL and Gosling are much, much more the sort of thing we're after.

PS I hate Baz Luhrmann.

Posted by: Caspar at November 17, 2010 10:38 AM

Mike has to have some more gangle to him. How about JGL for THAT? Or is he too young? And I agree with three-nineteen, Cloons is the only one I can think of with the charisma to match Cary Grant. We are talking about THAT version, aren't we? Or are you thinking about the original play version? I'm not so much into High Society.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:39 AM

JGL, of course, would be perfect for Mike, but he might be a little young at this point. I guess you could really play up the crush angle on his interest in Tracy Lord.

(Sorry, but at this point I'm a lot more interested in Mrs. Julien's remake of The Philadelphia Story than I am with this movie. Baz Luhrmann's overblown excess leaves me cold most of the time. I think he'll just steamroller over the subtleties of the book in order to make a georgeous and ultimately empty film.)

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2010 10:40 AM

Jinx!

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2010 10:40 AM

1) The Great Gatsby cries out for a definitive movie treatment. Or, at the very least, a generational one. Its lessons continue to need relearning.

2) I think Mulligan can play a little older than her true age. She's very calm.

3) Seyfried would be absolutely perfect as Jordan, I agree.

Posted by: sansho1 at November 17, 2010 10:41 AM

FUCK High Society!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 10:42 AM

Tom Hardy-Nick

I meant as Tom Buchanan. . .obvs. . .sorry.

I know I'm spamming the hail out of this post, but this is one of my favorite books of all times and I am very concerned. I will say, Caspar, that there is a carnival aspect to the book that suits Luhrmann well. All of Gatsby's parties? I mean, I'm not saying I want contemporary pop playing, there best be some ragtime. But the grotesque aspect that is attendant to the '20's. . .I think Luhrmann can make that shine.

Also, the color imagery in Gatsby ain't all that subtle. . .so Luhrmann can have fun with that. But, so help me, if there is any kind of dance number involving silk shirts being thrown in the air, I will retch, right there in the theater.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:43 AM

re: Mike has to have some more gangle to him.

It's early yet, but I suspect that will be my favourite sentence of the day. It reminds of of Wodehouse, "he was tall and he gangled".

Matt Damon is to old too.

Oh, OH, OH JON HAMM SHOULD BE DEXTER! I'd be his redhead any day.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 10:45 AM

DID YOU JUST COMPARE ME TO WODEHOUSE?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?! That's it, I'm going to stop typing now. It can't get any better than that. (I'm going to keep typing because I'm predictably hyper about film adaptations of classic books.)

Also, Hamm is a yar suggestion.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 10:48 AM

If Paltrow is your Tracy, Damon is not too old to play Mike. Paltrow and Damon are only two years apart, 38 and 40. And that's why Clooney is not too old to play Dexter - he's about 10 years older than Paltrow.


Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2010 10:58 AM

Mrs. Julien - Clooney is perfect, as Dexter was older than Tracy anyway. JGL would be great, but he really is too youn for Mike. He needs to be cynical and just a little grizzled before he becomes entranced by Tracy. Hmm, how about RR? He could bring the right combination of cynical humor and earnestness, I think...

Posted by: McSquish at November 17, 2010 11:02 AM

I find RR smarmy.

That's right, I said it. Ryan Reynolds is SMARMY.

Clooney is too damn old. He's ...checking...

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 11:11 AM

49! Even Hamm is a little too old. They are supposed to have married young and divorced impulsively. Cary Grant was 36 when they made the movie. Dexter can be a little older than Tracy, but not by so much it becomes Daddy Long Legs.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 17, 2010 11:17 AM

Daddy Long Legs. Diiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisgusting. Fred Astaire (love him) can't pull that sh*t off. Cary Grant in Father Goose, however. Well if I were Leslie Caron, I'd totes hit that.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 11:19 AM

David Tennant as Mike! Can he be English (or Scottish)? Gangly and 39.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 17, 2010 11:32 AM

I like Mulligan, but I think it was a little uninspired to cast the actress who most looks like a young Mia Farrow. I actually think Rebecca Hall would have been a more interesting (and less obvious) choice. But Luhrmann is nothing if not obvious.

I also agree that Gosling and JGL would be amazing -- and age-approproate -- choices.

But I don't really care because I also agree that Lurhmann will shit all over this book. And not in a good way.

Posted by: jimbob at November 17, 2010 11:36 AM

I don't care for this girl. Where did she come from and why is she here?

Posted by: Candy at November 17, 2010 11:47 AM

jimbob, my friend pointed out that this casting opportunity was the reason several young hollywood maidies were getting pixie cuts. And I actually would LOVE Rebeccca Hall for Jordan Baker.

The real casting conundrum for my right now is Myrtle Wilson. They need someone blowsy but young. . .that's not an easy order to fill.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 11:53 AM

I'm sorry, what people are going to see this again? Old people don't go to the movies, young people don't know what "The Great Gatsby" is, so the only group I could imagine this movie has an audience with is English Majors and asexual melodramatic college girls who romanticize the idea of being educated. Also, maybe hipsters who brag about the tremendous library of books they've read. "Oh, you've never read the Great Gatsby? It's only like, an American classic, but whatever. Not everyone has the patience for the classics like I do."

Posted by: superasente at November 17, 2010 12:17 PM

I AM a melodramatic female English Major hipster, how did you know, darling?

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 12:19 PM

You're the coveredinbees-knees, you know that?

Posted by: superasente at November 17, 2010 12:35 PM

Um, last I checked, DiCaprio is actually younger than Redford was when he played the part. So hate on him for being too puffy, but not too old.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at November 17, 2010 1:09 PM

Also, last I checked, NOBODY needs to be remaking the Philadelphia Story. Shut your mouths, people, they might be listening!

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at November 17, 2010 1:10 PM

Hmm, Mulligan's okay, but uninspiring. Why the need for another Gatsby movie, I don't know...

It's been three or so years since I last read it in HS, but I've mentioned on Pajiba who I imagined for the roles before: a lanky Ryan Gosling for Nick, some Naomi Watts/Amanda Seyfried hybrid for Daisy, a suave Cary Grant/Jon Hamm/Kevin Spacey hybrid for Gatsby (Gatsby comes from an underprivileged background, so I always felt Redford was too classic-looking...Leo's just too boyish), a Brando type for Tom (someone mentioned Tom Hardy), an athletic, proud, Hepburn-type like Keira Knightley for Jordan Baker (I don't remember much about Jordan), and a curvy, exotic type for Myrtle.

Posted by: KP at November 17, 2010 1:55 PM

superasente, that's a strange stance to take. The cast, the trailer, and the publicity machine will drive the box office, just as with any movie. Even "despite" the fact that it's based on a classic, and has been adapted before.

Aside from your doubts that anyone will see it, I get the sense that you're hostile to the very idea. Why?

Posted by: sansho1 at November 17, 2010 3:17 PM

TylerDFC I'm with you 100% that said I love Luhrmann like nobody's business, my all movie obsession?? all his fault with Romeo and Juliet but like someone said early one The great Gatsby is subtle and in my dieing love for Baz I can still admit that subtle he is not, so I dont know I will pull this off but let's have faith though third point in this infinite rant Gatsby and Daisy were sweethearts which means that even they are not exactly the same age the pretty much are. how apart are dicaprio and mulligan? like almost 15 years? good luck with that...

Posted by: rio at November 17, 2010 3:18 PM

No, you're totally right. I hated that fucking book, I hated the movie, and I can only barely tolerate remakes. I'd rather take it in the ass from a caddle prod then subject myself to this nonsense. I have nothing but vitriol for the whole idea.

Posted by: superasente at November 17, 2010 4:01 PM

I like them casting Ben Affleck as Tom Buchanan. Affleck gives good douchebag.

Posted by: Maureen at November 17, 2010 5:21 PM

Mrs.Julien: I mean, come on, Paltrow was born to play either Daisy Buchanan or Tracy Lord.

Coveredinbees: Oh, C.K. DEXTER HAAAAAVEN!!! (Marry me, Mrs. Julien)


Ooops. I thought you meant Tracy Lord the porn star.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 17, 2010 5:27 PM

Are we sure the Apocalypse isn't upon us?

A remake of a classic book(and movie) into something more modern?

I am shuddering right now, (not because of the cold).

I wonder what Fitzgerald is thinking? Oh....I know, "Crazy Americans....I thought I was safe."

Posted by: LordNinja at November 17, 2010 5:48 PM

Crazy Americans....I thought I was safe." I can't tell. Are you implying Fitzgerald isn't American?

And. . .yes. . .Affleck gives douchebag very well. He's physically good for the part too. I approve. (Tom Hardy would have been better. . .)

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 17, 2010 7:56 PM