web
counter
 

Clint Eastwood Circling the J. Edgar Hoover Biopic

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (16)



clintmain_43211t.jpg

A couple of weeks ago, we exclusively broke the news that Dustin Lance Black was set to pen a script based on the life of J. Edgar Hoover. Movie blogs picked it up, birds sang, and rainbows formed in the honor of the Hollywood Cog. Then, strangely, people began to go on with their lives.

It was very disconcerting.

And now that everyone knows that such a movie is being developed, and the Oscar-winning screenwriter of Milk is penning it, someone else goes and breaks the story that there’s a director circling the project.

That someone was The Hollywood Reporter, and they say Clint Eastwood is circling the project. And hey! I’m not so excited about it anymore. Why? Well, what we didn’t include in our original write-up of the movie — because I was so intent on leaving out Black’s sexuality, because I didn’t want anyone to think of him as the gay screenwriter (gasp! Gays in Hollywood?), was that Black’s sexuality makes him even more appropriate for the project, so long as you believe that gay screenwriters are more appropriate for movies about gay political figures (I happen to believe that sexual orientation should have no place in who gets what screenwriting gigs, but hey! If Dustin Lance Black wants to make “gay screenwriter who writes about gay political figures” his expertise, then I say go nuts. But use protection).

Anyway, what I was getting at was this: J. Edgar Hoover may have been one of the most important closet cases of the 20th century. Word is, the FBI director liked to dress in women’s clothing, and that the Mafia might have even had some blackmail material on him which kept him from pursuing certain figures. And like a lot of gay political figures, J. Edgar Hoover (or J. Edna Hoover, as many referred to him), liked to dig up dirt on other possibly gay politicians, like Adlai Stevenson and Eleanor Roosevelt.

I honestly have no idea how much of those rumors were true, but I kind of fear that with Clint Eastwood involved, there won’t be much exploration of that. It doesn’t really seem his sort of movie. But maybe I’m wrong. Maybe Eastwood is courting a little provocative controversy late in his career.

Anyway, the movie is being produced by Ron Howard and Imagine Entertainment, and while it’s not officially set up with a studio yet, it appears that Warner Brothers will likely pick it up. And given Eastwood’s history, he could probably bang this movie out in about three weeks. So, you never know: It could be done in time for Oscar season.









Ryan Reynolds and Jason Bateman Sign on to "Change Up" | Pajiba After Dark 3/11/10













Comments

Hmm. Was Hoover gay or just a cross dresser? According to my extensive research on the subject of cross-dressing (Eddie Izzard stand-up)Most are not gay. They just like to feel pretty. Who doesn't?

True story: A friend of mine was doing the internet dating thing, answered an ad for some dude. He seemed cool online, so she agreed to meet him for coffee somewhere. She shows up and the guy was head to toe cross-dressed. At Starbucks. In Spokane WA. He never mentioned it online in their correspondence. She said they had a lovely coffee, and never spoke again. I suspect he was prettier than she is. Or maybe the same size and she didn't want to share her clothes.
Anyway, moral of the story: If you agree to meet an internet dude, be sure to ask if he is a cross dresser. That could be a deal breaker or selling point, either way, saves you the embarrassment of showing up in the same dress.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at March 11, 2010 6:12 PM

Was Hoover gay or just a cross dresser?

From what I've read on the matter, Hoover was not a cross-dresser at all. That rumor got started by the Soviets (again, from what I've read) as propaganda.

It's pretty common knowledge that Hoover was a massive hypocritical closet case who persecuted other people for being gay. In other words, his life is a template for most modern Republican politicians.

Posted by: Jerce at March 11, 2010 6:32 PM

...then I say go nuts. But use protection).

I've seen the sex tape; he doesn't.

...Too soon?

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at March 11, 2010 6:45 PM

She shows up and the guy was head to toe cross-dressed. At Starbucks. In Spokane WA.

Nothing that happens in Washington state surprises me any more. Nothing.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at March 11, 2010 8:12 PM

Eastwood looks like the vampire from twilight in that photo

Posted by: idleprimate at March 11, 2010 9:33 PM

Oh yeah, Eastern WA is a freak show. I blame Idaho.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at March 11, 2010 10:53 PM

Opie Cunningham aint makin a cross dressin G-man movie. Aint happenin.

Posted by: logan at March 12, 2010 12:13 AM

Where will they find an actor ugly enough to play Hoover? Man could scare the scales off an ogre.

Posted by: , at March 12, 2010 1:01 AM

Holy carp, I thought that was Sparkle Dali Pattison up there, and DAMN, idleprimate beat me to it.

Posted by: BWeaves at March 12, 2010 10:12 AM

Eastwood and Howard would probably just give a nod to the rumors. There's been a lot of conjecture over the years, but (to my knowledge) no real evidence. People say a lot about powerful and hated figures, but a ton of supposition does not make an iota of fact. I still look forward to this one.

On a side note, has the mobile site been taken down, or is it being tweaked? I keep getting error messages now when attempting to access it.

Posted by: Nicolae at March 12, 2010 11:01 AM

Y'all need to get some seein' glasses if you mistook the Eastwood photo for Mr. Sparkle-puss.

Posted by: Ducky at March 12, 2010 11:22 AM

I hate to point out the obvious (okay I LOVE, I really really love to) but Clint Eastwood better circle faster. The man is pushing 80, there aren't a lot of projects ahead of him...*sniff, snarl, slap*

Posted by: bananapanda at March 12, 2010 1:46 PM

I live in the Spokane area, so this comment section is hilarious. Yes, let's go ahead and blame Idaho for any less-than-delightful strangeness. ;)

Posted by: Sara at March 12, 2010 5:44 PM

But the less than delightful strangeness really is more in the neighborhood of insane meth heads. Cross dressers wouldn't really be less than delightful. I mean, the drag show at Dempsey's would convince anyone of its potential awesomeness.

Posted by: Sara at March 12, 2010 5:48 PM

Where will they find an actor ugly enough to play Hoover? Man could scare the scales off an ogre.

If Hugo Weaving can play the Red Skull without a mask (and he can), then surely he can play J. Edgar. Needs a bit more weight, though.

Posted by: Brenton at March 12, 2010 6:34 PM

DiCaprio has all the depth of a bird bath
-after a week of drought ---and Eastwood's
been boring us with one drab, PC predictable
piece of cultural cannabalism after another
---for years!

MEANWHILE, Hollywood having made BILLIONS upon BILLIONS unflinchingly catering to the franchise slum denial needs of history's --MOST-- awesomely
genocidal regime -bar none! ---ACROSS the Pacific
(70 million exterminated in 'peacetime' unoutted,
unanswered for, unmentioned) --manages, once again, to 'mysteriously overlook' the 60th Anniversary of the staggeringly relevant, indeed, STILL unfolding ---KOREAN WAR --even as people continue to suffer and die ----by---the---millions!

SORRY CLINT! ---NO MORE TIME FOR YOUR SET-UPS!

-AMEN-

PS ---and if you delete this, you too are censoring damning, STONE COLD TRUTH...

Posted by: eber hart at April 24, 2010 11:37 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time