web
counter
 

Chris Columbus to Direct Superman?

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (28)



superman3ws.jpg

To borrow a phrase from my friend Steven L. Wilson, this is why I drink.

The Superman franchise has been a troubled one. Ever since the release of Superman II, the character has struggled to find an identity in the cinematic world. It’s actually a surprisingly difficult character to render sympathetically. Yes, he’s got the whole stranger-in-a-strange-land thing going on, but then again — he’s near-invincible. He can fly. He has godlike superpowers. There’s none of the angst and fear and unease that comes with Spider-Man, or the X-Men, or, of course, Batman. In short, Superman is, well… kind of boring. It seems strange to say that one of the most powerful beings in the DC Comics universe is difficult to make exciting, but it’s the truth. It’s what plagued Brian Singer’s Superman Returns (in addition to a plot that was a little too similar to the original Donner Superman).

So, Warner Brothers has been trying to figure out what to do with the character. In the years between the disastrously bad Superman IV: The Quest for Peace and Singer’s film, the character went through a series of iterations and concepts and ideas that is no less than astonishing. Stories where Lex Luthor was his brother. Stories with him fighting giant spiders and polar bears. Stories with Lois Lane having a virgin birth. I swear to you that all of those are true. But in the end, they went with Singer, who was a proven success with comic books after the first two X-Men films, and they ended up with a rather lackluster product that failed to become the blockbuster they wanted and needed (full disclosure: I actually very much enjoyed Superman Returns, but I don’t deny that it’s a deeply flawed film).

So what does Warner Brothers do for the next film, which will be another reboot / reborquel (tentatively titled The Man of Steel)? They’ve already attached Christopher Nolan to be sort of a Godfather to the production, in the hopes that some of his Batman brilliance will rub off. But they need a director, and they need one soon — they’re trying to get a film made for Christmas of 2012. Who do you turn to, in this hour of need. Who can save them from themselves? Who can take this somewhat boring product and give it new, exciting life?

How about the director of I Love You, Beth Cooper?

Oh.

Oh, fuck.

Supermanhomepage has the skinny on this newest rumor:

As we know, Warner Bros. are aiming to have a new Superman movie released to cinemas before the end of 2012. A source inside the studio has revealed to the Superman Homepage that an “offer has been sent out to Chris Columbus to direct the 3D Superman reboot for December 2012″.

Columbus, who directed the first two “Harry Potter” films for Warner Bros., is reportedly considered “the right fit” for the Man of Steel by those within the WB and Legendary Pictures. Christopher Nolan will be producing the film, from a script written by David Goyer.

Yeah. Rumor has it that Warner Brothers has offered the gig to Chris Columbus, the safest and blandest director in all of Hollywood. Columbus isn’t a bad director, per se. He’s just totally and completely passionless. He’s boring. Bland. He’s… serviceable. He directed the first two Harry Potter films, and while they were enough to get audiences interested, they’re easily the least memorable of the series so far.

I don’t hate Chris Columbus. But I don’t like him. He’s the Ford Taurus of directors. He’s just… there. He’s one of those directors about whom the most flattering thing that I can think of to say is, “he’s not incompetent.” Hiring Chris Columbus for Superman is better than hiring, say, Bret Ratner for X-Men 3… but not much better.

Is that what we want for the Man of Steel?

Fuck no. We want a visionary. Someone who will fill people with the same kind of awe that they felt when they watched Donner’s film. Someone who will restore that sense of wonder to the franchise. Frankly, we need Christopher Nolan, but with less pathos.

Which is of course the interesting question — will a guy like Nolan really be interested in working with a stiff like Columbus? Considering the near-Kubrickian early buzz about Inception, we can safely say that Nolan is one of the finest, most imaginative and innovative minds working in cinema right now. Pairing him with one of the dullest? I don’t see it. But who knows. Warner Brothers has fucked the dog in the past on big budget pictures (*cough*BattlefieldEarth/ Swordfish/ EckVsSever/ Beowulf/ 10,000BC*cough*)

We’ll keep you posted.









Box-Office Poison x 5 = Box Office Hit? | Machete Trailer | American Movie | They're Gonna Put Me in the Movies













Comments

No......no, this is not encouraging.....at all.

Posted by: Jay at July 9, 2010 10:25 AM

Without using kryptonite, there are basically two ways to make Supes compelling. 1) Have him become a suedo bad guy, a sort of big brother type, a la The Dark Knight Strikes Again or Red Son OR 2) have him face his own mortality, either through the death of others OR through his own possible death, a la All Star Superman.

Short of that all you can ever do is make him lose his powers or be angsty about his planet being gone. Boooring.

Posted by: Michael W. at July 9, 2010 10:37 AM

News flash!!!!
Superman is boring!
Always has been boring!
Always will be boring!

Posted by: logan at July 9, 2010 10:39 AM

I've always been puzzled by Superman's popularity.
Either the bad guys have Kryptonite or they don't.
A choice between predictable and boring.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at July 9, 2010 10:41 AM

I think Superman's time has come and gone. I love the first two Superman movies, two and a half when you count both Lester and Donner's. But I don't think it is possible to awe crowds with Superman anymore, not without changing the character beyond recognition.

The ball was dropped after Superman II, or actually during Superman II, and never recovered. Donner's film and a half are brilliant, but the franchise and character are associated with the follies that have plagued the series since Donner was let go.

I really thought picking the series up after Superman II was a brilliant move on Singer's part. It kept the first two movies relevant and in line with the current film (or films, had it been a success). But Singer relied too much on Donner, never wanting to really break free and 'Returns' just felt like one big homage instead of moving things forward.

Posted by: Jeff at July 9, 2010 10:44 AM

Superman sucks.

Sorry.

I just find it hard to contain that kind of superhero on screen for 2 hours. His enemies range from the ridiculous (Lex Luthor is THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES MWAHAHAHA!) to the impossible to put on-screen with a straight face (Mr. Mxyzptlk). So instead, you get guys constantly trying to drag him into a "realistic" world that recycles Luthor as the world's surliest real estate agent.

How many different places could you put Superman in that would realistically bring in hordes to movie seats? How much are you willing to depart from the usual Lois Lane/Jor-El stuff that has been done thrice over?

I'm glad you liked Superman Returns, too, TK. I didn't find it that bad either, and Routh did as good a job with Superman as I think was possible.

(p.s. I still believe that most people can't seriously believe a 6'4" mass of pure muscle can hide in plain sight with a pair of glasses and a shift in hair placement that works at a newspaper stuck in the 1950's.)

Posted by: D-Day at July 9, 2010 10:45 AM

Oh the heartless nabobs always come running.

Posted by: Jay at July 9, 2010 10:58 AM

Nolan and Columbus is like matter and anti-matter.

The first time they shake hands we're all done for.

Posted by: twig at July 9, 2010 11:04 AM

GODDAMNIT, why whon't they make THIS Superman movie?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_Superman!

This novel is a perfect, spectacular, stunning reboot/reimagining that is absolutely faithful to the spirit of Supes yet still feels fresh. I've read it at least three times and it only gets better each time through. It would be a PERFECT screenplay.

WHY, Hollywood? Why must you ruin everything good and pure?! Ugh.

Also, guys who hate on Superman - what does it feel like not to have a soul? You make me sad.

Posted by: Tammy at July 9, 2010 11:07 AM

The compelling thing about Superman when he's well written is that he wants to be Clark Kent. But he can't be. Dude has everything most people think they want, and it doesn't make him happy.

That isn't going to play to an audience on screen. At all. That's an indie film. Unless you tell the origin. The coming of age bit gives you a way for him to be afraid of his powers believably.

The alternatives to that only work in a longer form or with the usual gimmicks: Kryptonite, mysterious power failure, etc.

In principle, the stories you can tell about Supes are limitless, but the stories that work onscreen? Very, very limited.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at July 9, 2010 11:20 AM

Oh, I'd forgotten that one! It is a very good book.

Posted by: Jay at July 9, 2010 11:22 AM

The most interesting Superman story I've ever seen on-screen is seasons 2 - 4 of Smallville. It's one of the rare situations where a prequel works well BECAUSE you know what's going to happen (but not when or how). Clark will move to Metropolis and become Superman. He'll ditch Lana Lang for Lois. Lex Luthor will become Superman's greatest nemesis. His dad will die.

None of these things should be spoilers because they've been common knowledge since the 1940s, but the show did an amazing job setting up a universe where those plot points were inevitable yet unpredictable. In particular, the relationship between young Lex Luthor, Clark Kent, and Lex's father was really compelling television.

I don't think it would work to tell a similar story on the big screen. The new, pre-Superman universe takes time to develop (Smallville actually took a full season before it became worth watching regularly), and movie audiences would demand that Clark become the Man of Steel before the movie ended.

Still: a movie version of Lex Luthor in which Lex has a personal history with Clark Kent and Superman - and where Luthor is a savvy businessman and politician instead of a transparent, cartoonish megalomaniac - would be a welcome change.

Posted by: Wonkey The Monkey at July 9, 2010 11:38 AM

Try reading Kingdom Come, by Alex Ross and Mark Waid. It's a brilliant four-part mini-series about an older Superman who has turned away from the world after being rejected in favour of newer, more coldblooded vigilante superheroes willing to kill to get the job done.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_Come_(comics)

Posted by: Brenton at July 9, 2010 11:47 AM

Diane Nelson, now head of DC Comics, earned her bones on the "HP" films. I have a feeling she's trying to capture lightning in the bottle twice. What needs to be said here is that the books brought in the audiences, while Chris Columbus's direction was the last thing to attract a crowd.

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 9, 2010 11:57 AM

Filming Kingdom Come would be a bad business decision. You would sell 5 tickets each to the comic book fanboys and almost zero to everyone else who would look at it and say "WTF? That's not Superman."

The studio would also have to deal with the class action lawsuit from theater owners seeking payment of the cleaning bills for the buckets of nerd cum on all their seats.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at July 9, 2010 12:04 PM

Say what you will about Superman. He may just be an alien boy scout in a cape, but...shit, if they can make 22 (!!!!!!) James Bond movies...fuck, they can certainly make a good 50 Superman movies, because he's infinitely more interesting than that pompous limey dickshit.

Posted by: Case at July 9, 2010 12:11 PM

Superman is a pussy and always has been.
The one comic I did really enjoy was Red Son but that will never be made into a movie as it doesnt fit into the mythological trope.

Posted by: supafly at July 9, 2010 12:18 PM

Superman doesn't have to suck... (example Superman:TAS)

Lois Lane: I'm confused, Kent. See, I've lived in Metropolis most of my life and I can't figure out how some yokel from Smallville is suddenly getting every hot story in town.
Clark Kent: Well, Lois, the truth is, I'm actually Superman in disguise and I only pretend to be a journalist in order to hear about disasters as they happen, and then squeeze you out of the byline.
Lois: You're a sick man, Kent.
Clark: You asked.

Posted by: Vi at July 9, 2010 12:38 PM

Superman: Secret Identity is supposed to be a pretty cool book. It isn't entirely exactly Superman, but close.

Also out of print, thank you capricious gods of quality.

Posted by: twig at July 9, 2010 1:36 PM

Donner's Superman basically rebooted not only the character, but DC's entire comic universe.

It's time for DC (WB) to re-imagine the character.

Posted by: psy at July 9, 2010 1:50 PM

As I have already stated in previous similar-themed threads, if you want to make Superman interesting, all you need to do is scale back the extent of his powers. I'll try to cover new things rather than repeat everything I've said before.

Make him be able to lift 10 tons, but struggle with 20. Make him fast, but sometimes not fast enough to get there in time to save everyone. If he gets a bomb blown up in his face let the shockwave throw him back and knock the wind out of him. Let him get tired after hours of using his powers and let other things other than Kryptonite hurt him. It might be more interesting if there is a chance some could in fact catch him by surprise and make him actually work for a win.

As for making the character more compelling, the writers need to put the "Man" ahead of the "Super. I understand he's looked at as an incorruptible boyscout, but really make him lose his temper. If Metallo levels Metropolis, let Clark rip him to shreds. Can't touch The parasite because he's absorb Clark's powers and beat him with his own strength? Well have him drop a Skyscraper on him. Brainiac, threaten to launch Judgment Day, Big Blue loads Windows Vista into him.

And if one insists on having Lex Luthor as the main villain yet again (yawn), I think it would be great if Clark Kent wrote an expose for the Daily Planet that brings him to justice rather than Superman just dragging him off to jail. It would show that even without his powers Clark Kent can be a force for good.

If there was one element I would taken from Donner's version of the Man of Steel, it would be the statement Clark made at his father's funeral. "All these powers...and I couldn't save him." I think it would be far more compelling if sometimes even Superman can't save the day- that way we don't just drift off into predictable boredom knowing how everything will end; and no "turn back time" cop-out either.

Posted by: bleujayone at July 9, 2010 1:53 PM

It's time for DC (WB) to re-imagine the character.

It's always horrible when they try that. Well, the post-death clusterfuck/Jon Peters unfilmed horror were anyway.

Superman: Secret Identity is supposed to be a pretty cool book.

I liked it a lot. It's basically someone in a world where Superman is a fictional character, but this kid discovers he's apparently just like him.

Posted by: Jay at July 9, 2010 2:14 PM

i'm with bluejayone on this. the awesomeness of the superman animated series is that he wasn't all-powerful with limitless strength, he struggled to both fly AND keep a plane from crashing...
he had been holding back for so long, afraid he would hurt someone, that he didn't realize how powerful he could get.

Posted by: gp at July 9, 2010 2:33 PM

I think the mistake in the last movie was that they gave Kevin Spacey the role of Lex Luthor.

I mean, how could you not want Kevin Spacey to win? Sure he's an evil megalomaniac who's willing to cause the death of thousands just to make billions of dollars, but, shit... I wanted Keyser Söze to win in the end. I kinda wanted John Doe to win at the end of Se7en. And they did.

At the end of Superman Returns, I don't know, it was sort of like, "fuck you, Superman! You messianic, emotional retard. Let Luthor have his new kryptonite continent!"

Posted by: DarthBrookes at July 9, 2010 8:56 PM

Darth, possibly because of K-PAX and Pay It Forward. I can't bring myself to want anything good to happen to that man or his characters after those movies.

Posted by: Brenton at July 10, 2010 1:32 PM

Ok...why do people keep saying the first two Harry Potter films were the worst? Because in my opinion they were the best.

I freakin hated Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. I didn't care at all about Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. And I thought Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince was possibly the most anticlimactic film I've seen in a long time.

On the other hand...I LOVE the first Harry Potter and thought it, out of all the films, captured the essence of the book it was portraying perfectly.

Everyone always talks about how dark the new Harry Potter films are...do we not remember the darkness of Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets???? It was sooo dark! And it was only when they were 2nd years, when the content of the book wasn't nearly as dark as the content of the latter books.

Please. I'm not saying Columbus is an amazing director...but he's way better than most people give him credit for.

P.S. - Superman Returns was terrible. Terrible, terrible terrible.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at July 11, 2010 1:14 AM

The first two Harry Potter movies excellently represent the source material. Given this is the same website that excoriates directors for adding needless and mindless 'splosions to a movie, it's hypocritical to then criticize a director for not adding any extraneous action to a perfectly serviceable kids' story.

Anyway, given the consistency between Harry Potter films despite the wide variety of direction, it's clear someone(s) else had a heavy hand on the reins. So I wouldn't judge the director on his work on those films.

I agree Superman is a tough character to sell these days. I also agree that Kingdom Come is probably the most valid Superman representation I've seen because Clark finally chooses to act like the god he is -- however, overall it's a weak story suitable only for fanboys.

A reasonable version would be one in which Superman is an established superhero icon in a world where the fight for Truth, Justice, and the American Way only gets him sued, not to mention branded as a jingoistic bigot. I believe they already tried that with Hancock.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at July 11, 2010 11:33 AM

First off, to the haters who find Superman boring: you people are the reason shit like Superman: At Earth's End gets made. And I say that as a recovering Superman hater.

Second, there are plenty of well written stories about Superman IN THE DAMN COMICS. You don't even have to stick with the mainstream universe. Go Elseworlds or something. Indeed, crank down his power levels (just like in the comics post-Crisis). Also, there are plenty of villains that can go toe-to-toe strength-wise with Superman. Essentially, do some damn research for the damn movie!

he had been holding back for so long, afraid he would hurt someone, that he didn't realize how powerful he could get.

Exactly. His "World of Cardboard" speech in Justice League Unlimited was amazing. Focus on that aspect: show how hard it is to indeed have all this power in a world where the tiniest slip-up could be a disaster. Show how many times dickwads insist that he stop being a boyscout and kill villains, and how he is still an upright guy for NOT doing so. Highlight that the boyscout has the power to reduce the planet to a cinder, but chooses not to, BECAUSE HE IS A GODDAMN BOYSCOUT.

When writers saw that Superman couldn't be hurt physically, they found other ways. They wrecked his hometown. They fucked with his mind. They undermined his credibility, and even ran his name in the dirt. And he still kept going. And if they really, truly need to have knockdown, drag-out fights, they still had them.

Superman should be Atticus Finch with heat vision. Show all the crap he suffers, and how he does it because he can handle it, and no one else can. That is when he is at his best storywise.

THAT is Superman.

Posted by: Vermillion at July 13, 2010 9:09 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time