web
counter
 

Breaking Loose with the Brontes

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (27)



natalie portmanhalfsidenaked.jpg

So the Bronte sisters are due for some makeovers in the next year or so. I guess Jane Austen’s too busy having her canon B-movie serialized for our displeasure. So now some hot new directors move on to the other ladymakers to see if they can break that sophomore slump.

Cary Fukunaga, who directed what should be the best foreign picture of the year but won’t be — Sin Nombre — is due to remake Jane Eyre. In his version, he’s planning on focusing more on the Gothic. I’d much rather see him tackle Wide Sargasso Sea, but that’s just me. Fukunaga does well with the despairing and downtrodden, so I like this.

Meanwhile, Andrea Arnold, fresh from her buzz on Fish Tank (which I guess I will be reviewing after all), has decided to take on Wuthering Heights. The Wuthering Heights project has been passed like a dirty diaper around town, and finally landed in Arnold’s lap. I think she’ll do a bang-up job, as she wants to focus on the young romance aspect of the novel.

A bunch of actresses have been circling around Catherine — Natalie Portman among them (which would be a hell of a conflict of interest if she’s supposed to play Eliza in Pride and Prejudice and Zombies). Michael Fassbinder was also in talks to play Heathcliff — which would seem more likely considering his major role in Fish Tank — but he’s all but signed to Fukunaga’s Jane Eyre against Mia Wasikowska.

Either way, I’m kind of interested to see if either director goes the traditionalist route or if they update the settings and the storyline. I’m more interested in seeing a re-envisioning, particularly from Fukunaga.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



D.J. Caruso to Direct "I Am Number Four" | "Big Love" Recap: S4, E2 "The Greater Good"









Comments

Of course they wanna focus on the young romance aspect of Wuthering Heights. Copies of Wuthering Heights now fucking come with an "Edward and Bella's favorite book!" sticker. Bleughghghgh.

I don't even like Wuthering Heights much, but GOD.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at January 21, 2010 11:32 AM

Will there be nude scenes? Has anybody read Wuthering Heights? I wanna say I have, but I seem to have a large, book-shaped hole in my memory.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at January 21, 2010 11:42 AM

I'm feeling extra feminist today, so I'm gonna ask: why must you always post naked pictures of women and you only post pictures of men's abs?

Posted by: Bizarro Sofía at January 21, 2010 12:08 PM

When it comes to Wuthering Heights, I don't think anyone actually lays pipe in that book. There's lots of moaning and groaning but if my memory serves me correctly no actual penetration...

Posted by: East Coast Ugly at January 21, 2010 12:11 PM

I would be super-pleased if they did Wuthering Heights in the most honest possible way, that is to say, portraying the relationship between Catherine and Heathcliff every inch as fucked-up and mean as it was in the book.

In the same vein as Nat, I'm tired of the Twilight approach to that book. Wuthering Heights wasn't a love story, per se. It was more a hate story. And there's really nothing in there as far as romance goes to aspire to.

Posted by: Saint Saturn Sunshine at January 21, 2010 12:12 PM

And what's more, Bizarro Sofia, that's not actually a picture of Natalie Portman naked. It's photoshopped.

Posted by: Sar at January 21, 2010 2:05 PM

In his version, he’s planning on focusing more on the Gothic.

One ticket, please.

Posted by: Robert at January 21, 2010 2:13 PM

Saint Saturn:

You know if you've ever seen Giant, you've already seen a movie version of Wuthering Heights where they showed how fucked up the Katherine/Heathcliff relaitonship was.

East Coast Ugly:
There is penetration in Wuthering Heights but it's between Katherine and Linton.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 21, 2010 2:14 PM

If only Twilight ended the same way "Bella and Edward's favorite book" ended -- (um, Wuthering Heights spoiler? Does the statute of limitations on spoilers go for 175 year old books?) -- she dies and he goes crazy and makes everyone else miserable. Actually, it kind of fits, Bella's as interesting as death and he is moody all the time....

Posted by: megaroni and cheese at January 21, 2010 2:38 PM

Wuthering Heights flashback, 1973:

So I was like in Mrs. Drywall's English class, and we were all like supposed to be reading Wuthering Heights and all, um, uh, and then we like got to chapter 9, um, I think it was like chapter 9, or whatever, um, and then it says, "And Catherine produced an heir," and we were all like, "What?" and um Mrs. Drywall goes like Catherine had a baby, um and we were all like, "What? She was pregnant for the last 9 months?" When did it say that in the book? I don't remember a sex scene. So, I like actually go back and read the book and I um like still can't figure out when she like got pregnant. And I now um like feel cheated that I um actually had to read the stupid book.

FAR OUT!

Posted by: BWeaves at January 21, 2010 3:19 PM

I'm torn between wanting a movie version of Villette (my favorite Charlotte Brontë) and realizing they'd just fuck it up. (They'll give Lucy Snow a bustles montage; they'll ignore the complexity of the ending.)

Once upon a time there was a biopic about the Brontë sisters. I think Michelle Williams, Bryce Dallas Howard, and Evan Rachel Wood were attached. That movie sounds like it would be as awesome as anything starring those three could be. (Cf The Southerner's Dictionary entry on "Bless her heart" and "She's as cute as she can be".)

Juliet Barker's biography of the family is worth slogging through (there's a lot about Patrick and his challenges with the church. If you're all about church-fighting, then it's your thing. If you're about drunken Bramwell and his illegitimate baby -- you've got some pages to flip before you get there.) Also, Lucasta Miller's The Brontë Myth is an interesting look at how the sisters have been manufactured to conform to whatever (wrong) point about Lady Victorian Novelists is being made.

Posted by: Mike B. at January 21, 2010 4:00 PM

Yeah, I'll likely go see Jane Eyre, but not Wuthering Heights, because at last check they had cast ED WESTWICK as Heathcliff. What. The. Fuck.

Posted by: Tierney at January 21, 2010 4:46 PM

Jane Eyre - yay. Wuthering Heights can go suck on a diseased camel's festering sores. I have never in my life hated a character like I hated Catherine and Heathcliff. Of course it's the Twi-twats' favourite book, it would have to be.

Posted by: Joker at January 21, 2010 5:56 PM

@ Joker: How necessary is it for you to like the characters in order to enjoy/appreciate a book? (Genuine question -- I hear that criticism a lot about many books.)

Posted by: Mike B. at January 21, 2010 6:40 PM

I love Wuthering Heights so much. I love the language and the Gothic angst and the fact that there is not ONE sympathetic character in the whole thing. It's just like real life!

Posted by: ziggy at January 21, 2010 6:45 PM

True story: At the school where I teach, the check-out rate of Wuthering Heights has gone up since Twilight became so popular. Sadly, the check-in rate is really good, too. The kids(girls!) are confused and bewildered. They cannot understand the text so they return it pretty quickly. The vocabulary is too difficult; the narrative too confusing. I am not convinced Bella was smart enough to understand it, either. Poor Stephenie Meyers(whatev the spelling).

Ziggy, I love Wuthering Heights, too. It's an insane gothic ghost story. I have to admit I thoroughly enjoyed Ralph Fiennes' version of Heathcliff. For me, he seemed to capture all of the anger and morbid love Heathcliff had for Catherine.

I could go on and on.

Posted by: Goddess at January 21, 2010 7:08 PM

Posted by: duckandcover at January 21, 2010 7:18 PM

Mike B., I remember when I first heard about that biopic! Hugh Dancy and Jonathan Rhys Meyers were attached to it at the time.

There was a pretty great movie version of Wide Sargossa Sea starring the very beautiful and talented Rebecca Hall. I have way more interest in rewatching that.

Posted by: Annie at January 21, 2010 11:34 PM

I'm feeling extra feminist today, so I'm gonna ask: why must you always post naked pictures of women and you only post pictures of men's abs?

Posted by: Bizarro Sofía at January 21, 2010 12:08 PM
---
No ladybits showing = Guys With Abs have no manbits showing.

Sounds fair to me.

Posted by: , at January 21, 2010 11:42 PM

Mike B> Can't speak for anybody else, but I can accept not liking the character in certain books, but not ones that are supposed to be a romance. Especially if the author tries to claim that one or both of the protagonists are wonderful and romantic when they're actually behaving like emotionally abusive psychos or whiny, spineless fuckwits. Put it this way - if I can't understand why anybody would love that character, I'm not going to believe in the romance.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at January 22, 2010 12:26 AM

@ ScienceGeek: "Can't speak for anybody else, but I can accept not liking the character in certain books, but not ones that are supposed to be a romance. Especially if the author tries to claim that one or both of the protagonists are wonderful and romantic when they're actually behaving like emotionally abusive psychos or whiny, spineless fuckwits."

I think I agree with you on this. An author should have an understanding of her characters. Among a frillion other reasons, The Fountainhead is a toughy for me because I can't read Howard Roark the way Ayn Rand intended.

I don't think Emily Brontë meant for readers to come to Wuthering Heights expecting a romance novel. She's keenly aware of how unlikeable everyone -- from Cathy to Heathcliff to Nelly Dean to the narrator -- is. These are not good people.

Emily Brontë, I think, is writing a romantic novel -- but romantic in the way that Beethoven's symphonies are romantic, or the canvases of John Everett Millais* are romantic; which is to say: stormy and scary and emotionally turbulent, not puppies, rainbows, and heart-dotted i's. I think she's commenting on how destructive insular relationships are -- those two families in that novel are on the road to being Hapsburgs, what with all the intermarrying -- and how destructive love itself can often be, especially when misunderstood.

If you can bring yourself to do it, try re-reading Wuthering Heights as if you were watching an episode of A&E's "Intervention." Read it for the trainwreckiness of the whole thing. Notice how frankly Emily Brontë writes about sexual violence -- a pretty amazing thing for a young woman to write about in the nineteenth century.

Or, of course, don't read it at all -- because there's nothing worse than reading a book you hate on every single page.

____________________
* The woman in that painting? She laid in a bathtub of tepid-to-cold water every day for several weeks for Millais. She then got super sick and died. Thanks, art!

Posted by: Mike B. at January 22, 2010 6:19 AM

Has anyone ever published Jane Eyre and Wide Sargasso Sea together in one volume? Because I'd buy that. Talk about walking a mile in her shoes.

Because I'm enjoying this literary discussion, has anyone read Cold Comfort Farm? One of the secondary characters was a scholar lurking around the village who was convinced that Branwell Brönte had in fact written all the Brönte novels and his sisters had stolen them from him. His favourite conversation opener was, "Do you believe women have souls?"

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at January 22, 2010 10:57 AM

@ J.K. Barlow: "Has anyone read Cold Comfort Farm? One of the secondary characters was a scholar lurking around the village who was convinced that Branwell Brönte had in fact written all the Brönte novels and his sisters had stolen them from him. His favourite conversation opener was, 'Do you believe women have souls?'"

Ah, Mr Mybug. Creepy, dirty, way-too-sexual Mr Mybug. I enjoy that scene a lot, because I love the Brontë sisters (well, mostly Charlotte), and it's great to watch Flora continue engaging Mybug on the alcoholic Branwell rather than talking more about how hills look like breasts. (I love how he claims that it's the sisters who are the drunkards, actually: "They were all drunkards, but Anne was the worst of the lot.")*

There is so much that's great about Cold Comfort Farm. I think it gets written off as a droll English comic novel, but she's a smarter writer than she's given credit for.

____________________
* There's this irritating line of thinking in Austen studies about the novel Mansfield Park -- that since Austen barely mentions slavery, the novel must be consumed with slavery. That's how you know when someone is consumed with something, according to these thinkers: they never mention it. With that in mind, I draw your attention to this exchange in Cold Comfort Farm between Mybug and Robert Post's child:

"I've proved all this [that Branwell wrote the sisters' novels] by evidence from three letters to old Mrs Prunty."

"But do the letters," enquired Flora, who was fascinated by this recital, "actually say that he is writing 'Wuthering Heights'?"

"Of course not," retorted Mr Mybug. "Look at the question as a psychologist would. Here is a man working fifteen hours a day on a stupendous masterpiece which absorbs almost all his energy. He will scarcely spare the time to eat or sleep. He's like a dynamo driving itself on its own demonic vitality. Every scrap of his being is concentrated on finishing 'Wuthering Heights.' With what little energy he has left he writes to an old aunt in Ireland. Now, I ask you, would you expect him to mention that he was working on 'Wuthering Heights'?"

"Yes," said Flora.

"No - no - no! Of course he wouldn't. He'd want to get away from it for a little while, away frmo this all-obsessing work that was devouring his vitality. Of course he wouldn't mention it. Not even to his aunt."

Posted by: Mike B. at January 22, 2010 11:20 AM

Unfortunately I don't have a copy at hand, but doesn't Mybug then go on to mention a few of the mundane topics Branwell discussed with said Aunt, highlighting certain passages as especially touching?

No joke, I was turned on to this book by Seventeen magazine. They said it was like a turn-of-the-century Clueless, which I suppose isn't far off the mark. Clueless, of course, was actually based on Emma... A Jane Austen novel. Hey, did you see how I just brought this full circle? Thanks, Seventeen!

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at January 22, 2010 11:29 AM

...this was, of course, back when Clueless was just released and young people still read magazines. I'm just throwing that out there to re-establish my credibility, after the possibly damaging admission that I once read Seventeen.

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at January 22, 2010 11:32 AM

Where have you gone, Sassy magazine, our nation turns its lonely eyes to you. Ew. Ew. Ew.

Posted by: Mike B. at January 22, 2010 11:42 AM

Interested in a discrete and mutually beneficial relationship? http://AgelessOnly.com gives you a chance to make your life better.

Posted by: Brad at January 23, 2010 6:28 AM