RobCorddry_360x240.jpg

Bong Hits 4 Pajiba

The Daily Trade Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | October 23, 2007 | Comments (37)


All right, folks. Let’s just get something straight here, OK? There are a few actors and actresses out in Hollywood who the many of us love in this little part of the world (Pajiba-land) that — for whatever reason — will never, ever strike it big in the movie business, no matter how much we’d love to see it. In five years, we will still be complaining about what a shame it is that they will still doing low-rent comedies that fail to take advantage of their talents, while reminiscing about how great they used to be in so-and-so show. These actors/actresses include, but are not limited to: Will Arnett, David Koechner (who hasn’t been funny in so long I forget why he was supposed to be), Tony Hale, David Cross, Amy Poehler, Amy Sedaris, Samantha Bee, Busy Phillips, Lewis Black, and Rob Corddry. I’m really sorry, but please stop holding out false hope, folks. The best that any of them can wish for is a decent role on another television show that doesn’t completely suck or a nice best-friend gig on a mediocre romantic comedy. Just be glad they aren’t Percy Daggs III, who is already taking bit parts in crappy pizza commercials. For the record, I haven’t completely given up hope on Nathan Fillion or Alan Tudyk, but that’s only because I’m deluding myself.

I bring this up because Rob Corddry is making another valiant, though misguided, effort to strike it big in Hollywood, so far failing to understand that 98 percent of America neither knows nor cares who the hell he is. And that’s precisely the reason that poor Rob can’t find a decent script and thus continues to take parts in embarrassing movies that only dim his box-office prospects even further. It’s a vicious circle and, unless you’re buddies with Judd Apatow, it’s not one you’re likely to escape. Corddry will be starring alongside box-office poison, Jason Biggs and Eva Longoria, in a movie called Lower Learning. In it, he’ll play a shady principal at an elementary school that Longoria — a school inspector — will be sent to investigate. She will enroll her boyfriend (Biggs), a cop, to take a job as the vice principal to further probe said shadiness. Mark Lafferty, whose only credit is writing and directing the 2001 spoof The Seventh Sense (“I see gay people”), will write and direct. No one will see this movie. So, for God’s sake, why don’t these talented actors and actresses actually combine forces and write their own ensemble comedy? It’s their only prayer, I’m afraid.

We’ve already told you that Peter Jackson, who I won’t even bother mocking right now, will be directing the big-screen adaption of Alice Sebold’s The Lovely Bones. In casting news, Ryan Gosling, who was set to play little Susie Salmon’s father, has dropped out of the production due to creative differences — i.e., he wanted to make a good film and Peter Jackson was incapable of doing so. He must have felt awfully strong about it, too, because he’d already gained 20 pounds and grew a beard for the role. Mark Wahlberg, who doesn’t care about quality as long as he can raise that pretty little eyebrow of his and sneer, will be taking over the part, starring opposite Rachel Weisz, who will be playing Ruthie’s mom; Susan Sarandon will play Grandma; and Stanley Tucci will be playing George Harvey, the man who raped 13-year-old Susie. Peter Jackson will be playing the role of hack.

The folks behind Sylvester Stallone’s next installment in the Rambo franchise have finally decided upon a title. They’re going to call it Rambo. Brilliant, right? It probably took a dozen men with $1 million salaries to come up with that. Anyway, based on the buzz that the unofficial trailer has generated (if you haven’t seen it, it’s good for about half a dozen laughs), executives are purportedly negotiating with Stallone to come back and do a fifth Rambo film. I understand they’ve already come up with a title for it; they’re going to call it, Ooops, I Crapped My Pants. Here’s the Rambo trailer:

Oh, did you hear? Naomi Watts will be starring in a remake of Hitchcock’s The Birds. Martin Campbell (Casino Royale, The Mask of Zorro) will direct. The writers behind Boogeyman and The Need have penned the script. Michael Bay is producing; I understand that he actually plans to dig up Hitchcock’s remains so that he can continue his streak of appearing in cameo roles in his films. He will be playing “Pissed Off Skeleton #3.” His one line, a bit of ad lib, will be: “I will eat your babies and shit out their remains into the fire pit of hell for this, you cocksucking motherfuckers.”

In a final production-related note, Paramount Pictures and MTV are combining forces to produce a movie based upon the Bong Hits 4 Jesus case. For those of you unfamiliar with the legal shenanigans involved, I’m not going to go into specifics, but it concerns a high-school student who was expelled for displaying a banner that read “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” during a school-supervised event to watch the Olympic torch pass by in Juneau, Alaska. The case eventually went to the Supreme Court, where Chief Justice Roberts held up the suspension, concluding that it was “school speech” and not run-of-the mill speech on a public street that would’ve normally been protected. Anyway, the movie will be based on the suspended student, Joseph Frederick, and his family, and how the suspension wreaked havoc on their lives. Frederick’s father, an insurance adjuster, was apparently fired from his job for standing up for his son. The project is being described as something akin to Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, though I seriously doubt Mr. Smith made the trip with a bag of Doritos and the giggles.

On DVD this week, feast on the unrated edition of Hostel: Part II, which — in addition to the expected flesh pruning and impromptu mastectomies — also includes Bambi’s mother, who is shot, flayed, dissected, and blended, in addition to a short featuring Donald Duck’s feather removal and subsequent molestation by Paddington the Bear. Good times. If that doesn’t do it for you, rent Meet the Robinsons or Mr. Brooks, instead.

In the trailer watch, have you folks seen the one for Tim Burton’s Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street? Johnny Depp! Alan Rickman! Blood! Gore! Revenge! Haircuts! Showtunes!









Pajiba Love 10/22/07 | Sarah Landon and the Paranormal Hour













Comments

ANOTHER FUCKING RAMBO?!?!?

Oooh - this time with extended gore, in case you still have something left to puke up all over your theater-going neighbour!

Watch with glee as Stallone masters such arts as the monosyllabic monologue, the meaningful glare and lets his weapons do the talking!

So... Copland was a fluke, then...

Posted by: malikvlc at October 23, 2007 9:31 AM

Yikes! Sweeney Todd will be unforgetable, either horrendously bad or sublimely good. I am betting the former but will see it nonetheless. If it gets too bad I'll just close my eyes, listen to the music and remember Angela Lansbury. She singlehandedly carried the show on Broadway, and the others were no lightweights. I saw it seven times the first year I moved to Manhattan (every time a friend visited). I am hopeful, Tim Burton, but just how bad it could be already gives me the shivers.

Posted by: rudy at October 23, 2007 9:34 AM

Johnny Depp and Alan Rickman in one movie - orgasm inducing entertainment! I hope that ST is at least halfway good because I plan to watch it many, many times.

It should be against the law for Hitchcock films to be remade, especially if Michael Bay has anything to do with it.

Posted by: Marianne at October 23, 2007 9:46 AM

I just choked on my morning diet coke (wsapnin likes her caffeine cold)during the Sweeney Todd trailer. Was it the blood? The boredom of seeing Helena Bonham Carter in yet another olde Enlish costume? No -- it was the tag line at the end.

Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
(blood dripping..fade out)

THIS CHRISTMAS


Oh the laughter nearly brought bubbles thru my nose.

Why not just say "December"? Whatever. But I am a HUGE fan of Burton/Depp collaborations especially when Johnny uses his cockney accent. But can Burton find some other creepy looking woman wearing fake fucked up teeth (or are they real?) to be in his movies other than his girlfriend? C'mon!

Despite HBC I'm sure I'll be there with my $7.50.

Posted by: wsapnin at October 23, 2007 10:02 AM

They must stop remaking Hitchcock films. They cannot improve them.

Posted by: Kermit at October 23, 2007 10:25 AM

Re Rambo: I think they should call it Where Are My Camo Depends?

wsapnin: I also started laughing uncontrollably in the Sweeney Todd trailer; it reminded me of Scrooged when Bill Murray reviews the apocalyptic ads for the Christmas special. Stentorian Announcer: "You can't miss this one . . . Your life just might depend on it!"

Alan Tudyk has found his niche, with small but meaningful character roles in excellent films. He's been in Knocked Up and 3:10 to Yuma just in the last year, along with a larger ensemble role in Death at a Funeral, which was reasonably well-reviewed elsewhere. Much as I love him, I never really expected more, and good on him for supplying such a critical part of the film experience -- the excellent character actor.

Wash, out.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 23, 2007 10:30 AM

That must be a shorter version of the trailer - I implore everyone to try to find the one I saw before Elizabeth, in which Depp actually sings.

Posted by: Sarah at October 23, 2007 10:41 AM

Depp singing? Depp singing in his cockney accent? oohh.. I am all atwitter. My heart is actually fluttering.

Just when I was going to get busy doing something constructive with my day, now I must go websearching for the trailer. Thanks, Sarah for wasting more of my time! Or I could watch "Honky Tonk Freeway" that just came on Showtime. Hmm..so tempting.

Posted by: wsapnin at October 23, 2007 11:03 AM

I saw the longer Sweeney Todd trailer online somewhere... it was either the Quicktime Trailers website or on YouTube. It was enjoyable.

...Ryan Gosling, who was set to play little Susie Salmon's father, has dropped out of the production due to creative differences -- i.e., he wanted to make a good film and Peter Jackson was incapable of doing so. Zing!

Sorry. This Round-Up was so full of zingers that my boss is shooting me dirty looks from across the room! Good job!

Posted by: AnnArrogance at October 23, 2007 11:03 AM

>

Oh dear God in heaven! Is it me or is EVERYONE just wrongly cast for this film? I could maybe, MAYBE, see Stanley Tucci pulling it off. Maybe. The others are just miscast.

And how is Peter Jackson going to handle the whole afterlife thing? I foresee heavy-handedness where Sebold had a sense of the ethereal. I figure Susie will probably end up looking like a member of the army of the dead in The Return of the King or something.

As a father of girls I had a really, really hard time working through that book. It was just too painful. The film adaptation sounds like it will be painful too, but for altogether different reasons.

Oy vey!

Posted by: Armando at October 23, 2007 11:08 AM

I found the trailer on imdb.com -- Brilliant! Now I can get back to the couch and "Honky Tonk Freeway".

Ooohh I love rainy days. It's good to be wsapnin.

Posted by: wsapnin at October 23, 2007 11:09 AM

"The project is being described as something akin to Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, though I seriously doubt Mr. Smith made the trip with a bag of Doritos and the giggles."

Oh, my God. You're so goddamned funny. Dustin, I know you're married, but would you consider an e-affair with a new mother? Alluring, I know.

I'm trying to imagine my parents' reaction to my pulling a similar stunt in high school....

Posted by: Samantha T at October 23, 2007 11:50 AM

On DVD this week, feast on the unrated edition of Hostel: Part II, which -- in addition to the expected flesh pruning and impromptu mastectomies -- also includes Bambi's mother, who is shot, flayed, dissected, and blended, in addition to a short featuring Donald Duck's feather removal and subsequent molestation by Paddington the Bear. Good times.
I tip my hat to you, good sir, for that is the funniest thing I've read in weeks. And still better than anything Eli Roth every produced. Bravo. Bravo.

Posted by: Robert at October 23, 2007 11:54 AM

Been waiting for Sweeney Todd for awhile... love Tim Burton, love Johnny Depp. I would pay to listen to Alan Rickman read the want ads....

Posted by: nancy at October 23, 2007 12:26 PM

I can't wait for Sweeney Todd :)

The thought of Michael Bay getting anywhere near The Birds makes me die a little inside. THIS MOVIE DOES NOT NEED TO BE REMADE. BACK THE FUCK OFF, HOLLYWOOD. Alfred Hitchcock got it right the first time. It can't be improved. The end.

Posted by: KT at October 23, 2007 12:37 PM

Naomi Watts desperately needs another good film, as does Rachel Weisz


*sigh*

Posted by: Rene at October 23, 2007 12:43 PM

Wait, who got to see a Sweeney Todd preview before Elizabeth? Because I totally didn't and now I'm angry that I wasted $7.50 (student ticket) on 2 hours worth of costume porn and didn't even get to see Johnny Depp singing. Damnit.

I'm on board with those who think re-making "The Birds" is a travesty. Not everything can be improved upon with modern technology and film making ideals. I'm betting they're just adding more gore because you know, suspense is for when you don't have an FX team.

Posted by: Rusty at October 23, 2007 1:15 PM

Ah, so that's why Bonham-Carter is dating Tim Burton, so she can get another role in which she can use her annoying frown (her only dramatic expression) now that all E.M Forster novels have been done.

On another note, it's "Paddington Bear" not "Paddington The Bear", and yes, it matters.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 23, 2007 1:22 PM

Right on Paddy the Dog....oh I mean Paddydog!

Posted by: Finn at October 23, 2007 1:27 PM

@Rusty:

I'm betting they're just adding more gore because you know, suspense is for when you don't have an FX team.

I read somewhere that it's much worse than just that: the producers apparently think that a major "flaw" of the original is its lack of motivation/backstory for the bird violence. So they're gonna fill that in.

Uggggghhhhhh......

Naomi Watts is also in the shot-by-shot remake that Haneke's doing of his own Funny Games. I agree that she needs a role that showcases her talents better. Eastern Promises was good, but didn't really let her do a whole lot; no one saw The Painted Veil. And starring in two remakes in a row (as well as being most famous, still, for two other remakes: The Ring and King Kong) will not help this matter, even if the Funny Games one is good (I hate to prejudge, but I don't see how the Birds remake can possibly register as "good")

Oh, Naomi. Please justify my love again!

Posted by: be right back at October 23, 2007 2:00 PM

Hee! Finn: I am sometimes known as Paddy The Bitch!

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 23, 2007 2:15 PM

be right back--you make me giggle.

When my son was 2 and I would stop at the gas station to fill up, I would run inside and pay real quick. Then everytime we passed a gas station he'd say "Mommy, there's the 'be right back'". He thought that's what they were called.

thanks for the sweet memory of my little boy who will be a teenager next month and thus be removed of his brain cells for the next 10 years.

Posted by: wsapnin at October 23, 2007 3:27 PM

Hah! I heard about the Ryan Gosling-Peter Jackson split up and ran over to see what Pajiba had to say. Never disappointing. I also heard through a more than likely unreliable source that "Peter was into it, but when Ryan showed up to work he 'was still expecting some movie star allure -- not paunch and a beard.'" Hrm...I hope that's not true...

Posted by: vdo at October 23, 2007 3:48 PM

holy crap! did i actually just see Rambo decapitate a dude with a punch? f**kin' sweeeeet!

Posted by: causaubon at October 23, 2007 6:23 PM

Am I reading you correctly, be right back? A backstory for the bird violence? They're goddamned BIRDS they have brains the size of peanuts! The lack of explanation is what makes it scary! I should not be this angry about a shitty movie but DAMNIT, that is ridiculous.

I put forth that any of the Pajibans could make a better movie for half the money that this "Birds" remake is going to cost. Any pay off any outstanding student loans at the same time. Goddamn Hollywood.

Posted by: Rusty at October 23, 2007 6:45 PM

@Rusty

I found the reference (the filter won't let me post it intact, so cut and paste into your browser):

defamer.com/hollywood/cathy-schulman/great-moments-in-remake-history-building-a-better-birds-253814.php

Read it, then find some nice birds who'll mercy-peck your eyes out for you. Tippi will thank you.

Posted by: be right back at October 23, 2007 7:09 PM

Is it just me, or is Sylvester Stallone's face melting??? Rambo got very melty in his old age...

Posted by: shel at October 23, 2007 7:18 PM

Dammit!

Here is the bendy version of the URL. Sorry.

http:// defamer.com/hollywood/cathy-schulman/
great-moments-in-remake-history
-building-a-better-birds-253814.php

Posted by: be right back at October 23, 2007 7:19 PM

"In a final production-related note, Paramount Pictures and MTV are combining forces to produce a movie based upon the Bong Hits 4 Jesus case."

Yes! Yes, yes, yes! I love this story, and I think the supreme court is full of crap for ruling this kid can't say whatever the hell he wants on a public street, but oh well. The kid eventually studied briefly at my alma mater, University of Idaho, where I'm sure he met many a like-minded individual.

Posted by: Cady at October 23, 2007 10:29 PM

"Is it just me, or is Sylvester Stallone's face melting??? Rambo got very melty in his old age..."

No it's not just you. I think that age with some good ole HGH is messing up an already messed up grill. Seeing Stallone box in "Rocky Balboa" was akin to seeing Frankenstein fight.

Not feeling it with Sweeney Todd. Could be hit or miss. John Rambo looks like a decent way to stir fry your brain for a couple hours.

Posted by: Mr. West at October 24, 2007 12:59 AM

Not too often that I agree with Scalia et al., but I actually agree with the majority in the BH4J case. A 5-day suspension's a bit long for my taste and I think the student was right for challenging it administratively, but I don't see it as a First Amendment violation. I know that's likely not a popular opinion in these parts, but so be it.

Posted by: Samantha T at October 24, 2007 6:30 AM

I am so excited for Sweeney Todd. I did always like how it was a bit ambiguous whether it was Sweeney or Mrs. Lovett who was the real monster- it looks like the movie has made its choice, though.

Posted by: Phaeolus at October 24, 2007 2:27 PM

Every version I've seen on the Sweeney Todd trailer, I have thoroughly disliked. However, I still have high hopes for this movie...

Posted by: Colin at October 24, 2007 4:54 PM

Marianne- "Johnny Depp and Alan Rickman in one movie - orgasm inducing entertainment!"
...exactly the sentiment shared by my fellow theater junkies when we were discussing this movie. Just thinking about it makes my panties wanna fly off! =) Although HBC makes me wanna jab letter openers in my eardrums so I don't have to listen to her patented crazy person cackle...

Posted by: stef at October 25, 2007 4:11 PM

Ever since I saw it was being made, I've been SO SO SO SO SO excited for Sweeney Todd, especially as a Tim Burton special with Johnny Depp attached. I think it's bout time Burton got back to making his specialty in the "creepy" genre of Edward Scissorhands, Nightmare Before Christmas, Beetlejuice, etc. and no more Planet of the Apes, Willy Wonka drivel.

Posted by: RichieRich at October 27, 2007 4:25 AM

Ever since I saw it was being made, I've been SO SO SO SO SO excited for Sweeney Todd, especially as a Tim Burton special with Johnny Depp attached. I think it's bout time Burton got back to making his specialty in the "creepy" genre of Edward Scissorhands, Nightmare Before Christmas, Beetlejuice, etc. and no more Planet of the Apes, Willy Wonka drivel.

Posted by: RichieRich at October 27, 2007 4:26 AM

I understand that Michael Bay is producing remakes of crappy Horror-movies, which weren't that good back then anyway. But now he's about to rape a real classic?! Seriously, at times, life becomes surreal beyond comprehension. Michael Bay produces a remake of an Alred Hitchcock movie? WTF?! To begin with, no Hitchcock movie needs a remake. They're perfect as movies can be. Secondly, Michael "I like cars and explosions" Bay? No way.

Posted by: Arthur Dent at October 27, 2007 7:30 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time