web
counter
 

Where I Lose Even More Faith in the Green Lantern Movie

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (22)



37321_blake-lively.jpg

It’s all beginning to congeal. The upcoming Green Lantern movie, as many of you probably already surmised, isn’t going to be a franchise franchise. It’s not going to be Transformers or Batman. It’s going to be more on the level of G.I. Joe — a decent cash machine, but fairly forgettable after opening week.

I thought after his huge success in The Proposal and his turn as Deadpool in X-Men: Origins, that Ryan Reynolds really was going to be the next A-Lister. But I’m beginning to feel like he’s just another Channing Tatum, at least in the eyes of Hollywood execs. It’s why he’s still taking Tom Cruise’s castoffs (Motorcade), reteaming with Anna Faris for another crappy romantic comedy (TMI), and even making a gender-reversal comedy written by one of the worst screenwriters in Hollywood, Alan Loeb. He’s got a more realistic picture of his career than most of us do.

I realize that Green Lantern is getting a solid director in Martin Campbell (Casino Royale), but take away his two Bond flicks, and Campbell is not that big a name, either. He’s a more than competent director, but he has no imprimatur — no style of his own. And the writers they have for Green Lantern? Greg Berlanti and Michael Green.They’re fairly small-time, too, having only written a lot of television in the past (“Smallville,” “Eli Stone,” “Everwood,” “Dirty Sexy Money,” and “Heroes,” between them).

Indeed, while the hype surrounding the project may be overwhelming online — where fanboys and comic-book geeks dominate the conversation, for good or bad — in the real world, this is set to be just another second-class movie for a second-class superhero. Not even Ryan Reynolds can obscure the inherent weakness of the character.

Want even more evidence? Here it is: 22-year-old Blake Lively has been cast as the female lead, as a woman “who who runs her father’s aerospace company and hires cocky test pilot Hal Jordan (Reynolds), who later becomes the intergalactic policeman Green Lantern. In the comics, the romance became complicated when an alien race bestowed her the power of a crystal called the Star Sapphire.”

Blake Lively? From “The Gossip Girl”? And she was chosen over Jennifer Garner and Kerri Russell, both of whom I like, but neither of which are considered huge stars in their own right, either. You cast Blake Lively, and you get a Blake Lively kind of movie.

The pot is filling up with second-rate talent, folks. And I wouldn’t expect better than that for the final product.

(Source: THR confirming what was originally reported on Latino Review)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Red Riding Trilogy Trailer | Star Trek Gets a Release Date, X-Men to Begin Filming in 2011









Comments

OMG, Blake Lively was cast! She's so talented in Gossip Girl, the best show ever...

I can't keep that up. It's a shame that such a talentless actress would be cast over Keri Russell and Jennifer Garner. She probably costs less then the other two. The thing I'm waiting for is a picture of the suit, and for it to have nipples.

Posted by: anthonyva at January 11, 2010 11:45 AM

And the writers they have for Green Lantern? Greg Berlanti and Michael Green.They’re fairly small-time, too, having only written a lot of television in the past (“Smallville,” “Eli Stone,” “Everwood,” “Dirty Sexy Money,” and “Heroes,” between them).

Oh, well, one of them wrote for Heroes? Shit on a stick folks, how could this movie go wrong? Maybe they'll play with time, everyone will loose their superpowers, die and come back at least once, and piss and moan continuously about how horrible it is to be superhuman.

Fuck.

Posted by: Xtreme at January 11, 2010 11:47 AM

Blake Lively?

More proof that Hollywood's got nothing of substance to present to the public. These aren't actors, folks. They are GAP commercial extras playing actors.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at January 11, 2010 11:50 AM

i watched gossip girl for a season (don't you dare judge me) and every time she laughs and flips her hair, a unicorn loses its wings.

Posted by: stopthemadness at January 11, 2010 11:53 AM

Indeed, while the hype surrounding the project may be overwhelming online — where fanboys and comic-book geeks dominate the conversation, for good or bad — in the real world, this is set to be just another second-class movie for a second-class superhero.

This is a good point. Movies that are hyped overwhelmingly on-line -- where comic-books and fanboys dominate -- never translate to success in the "real world" where comic-books and fanboys are so few and far between and have such difficulty getting out their parents' basements (see, e.g., LOTR, Dark Knight, Iron Man, Avatar, Spider-Man, etc., etc., etc.).

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at January 11, 2010 11:59 AM

The signs don't look good for this movie, but I'm withholding judgment until I see Ryan Reynolds in costume. That might redeem the rest of this movie. In my pants, at least.

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at January 11, 2010 12:10 PM

Dude, it makes perfect sense: She is the female Ryan Reynolds.

I'm sorry: The boy is beautiful, but he can't ACT.

Just like Serena.

Posted by: boo at January 11, 2010 12:49 PM

Waitaminit:

BSlim: You watch movies for substance?? No wonder you are so ... you.

Posted by: boo at January 11, 2010 12:50 PM

The only Green Lantern movie I will be watching is that fan-made trailer with Fillion as Hal Jordan.
No other version exists in my mind, thanks very much, and this casting news just supports that theory.

Posted by: Stella at January 11, 2010 1:15 PM

Yes, when I think of the kind of woman who can run an aerospace company, I think of a 22-year-old pile of hair extensions, boobs, and Herve Leger bandage dresses. Good job Hollywood!

Posted by: DawnDraper at January 11, 2010 1:32 PM

Forbiddendonut writes: "This is a good point. Movies that are hyped overwhelmingly on-line ... never translate to success in the "real world" where comic-books and fanboys are so few and far between ..."

Yet one more example of why someone needs to invent a sarcasm text. At first I read this and thought, "Why is he destroying his own point by giving examples of the exact opposite?" Then I re-read it and found the subtext -- which was "nu-uh."

Anyway, I agree with FD's sentiment. Fanboy's are a huge money-spending community. We'll spend money we don't even have. You think we have the cash flow to actually pay for weekly comic books? No sir. We'll sell plasma for our fan-boy fix (haven't actually done that yet, but the fact that I've considered it should speak volumes).

Posted by: superasente at January 11, 2010 1:57 PM

I can't believe they cast Blake Lively in this role. And over Jennifer Garner? Over Keri Russell? God, I wish JJ Abrams was doing this movie. There is no way he would've missed a chance to get Sydney or Felicity back in action.

Posted by: atinymachine at January 11, 2010 2:11 PM

i watched gossip girl for a season (don't you dare judge me) and every time she laughs and flips her hair, a unicorn loses its wings.

While I do agree that Blake Lively is a killer of rainbows "lite", unicorns don't actually have wings.

Or maybe that's what you were going for. We need a sarcasm font up in here!!

Posted by: MM at January 11, 2010 2:17 PM

Well I hate to break with tradition but I think Blake Lively is passable in Gossip Girl and was really quite good in The Private Lives of Pippa Lee. She's also beautiful, and as boo said, Ryan Reynolds would not be getting jobs if he weren't so pretty.

Posted by: sevenstories at January 11, 2010 2:33 PM

The only (!) problem I have with this casting is that she's too young to play a real adult with a real job. Why is she running her father's company? She's like, twelve. He has to be super dead.

Posted by: welldressed at January 11, 2010 2:58 PM

of course they don't have wings. they do, however, have three golden testicles.

::whimsical emoticon::

Posted by: stopthemadness at January 11, 2010 3:23 PM

transformers?? a franchise franchise??

sorry but transformers2 was voted worst movie of 2009.

Posted by: pam at January 11, 2010 4:39 PM

"Yes, when I think of the kind of woman who can run an aerospace company, I think of a 22-year-old pile of hair extensions, boobs, and Herve Leger bandage dresses. Good job Hollywood!"

Wow. I'm trying to visualize a hairy, well dressed pile of boobs yelling at Ryan Reynolds. It's probably a better movie than this one-some soft of Sci Fi romcom.

She's a planet conquering,flesh eating mutant alien fashionista! He's a wacky delivery boy/secret agent and Earth's last hope! See them feud, fight and fall in love in "ZOORGBOOB and Ted forever!! In 3D!!"*

*spoiler-she eats him.

Posted by: mrcreosote at January 11, 2010 5:13 PM

Am I missing something? Is Jennifer Garner a good actress? Everybody here is talking as though it's assumed that she is.

Posted by: Eep at January 11, 2010 7:16 PM

Blake Lively is apparently porking Weinstein who threw off Gretchen Moll as his favorite cum dumpster for her, allegedly after a farewell threesome with another guy complete with a facial and pearl necklace according to the blind items, who Weinstein was hitting up for money undoubtedly. He got her the SNL hosting job, instead of a topless picture on the cover of Vanity Fair, and the Green Lantern part through his good offices too apparently.

Not enough Dramamine for me to even think about what Weinstein looks like in flagrante but I'm not a multimillionaire either. Read here what Harvey said about Gretchen Moll's sexual skills.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at January 11, 2010 10:29 PM

Jennifer Garner has a lifetime pass from me because of Alias. I just pretend most of her other movies (I'm looking at you Elektra and Ghosts of Girlfriends Past) don't exist.

Posted by: Even Stevens at January 12, 2010 2:09 AM

she's too young to play a real adult with a real job.
She's 22. Old enough...not a teenager.

Posted by: james at January 13, 2010 5:00 PM