web
counter
 

Bill Maher Slams Oprah's Favorite Things

By Cindy Davis | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (56)



Thumbnail image for billmaher.jpg

Ah Bill, I have to hand it to you - your cojones must be made of steel. Or maybe you just enjoy having them kicked - I know some people like that sort of thing. Either way, as a man who is seriously either loved or despised, the scales have just tipped heavily to one side as you have brought upon yourself the wrath of Oprah fans. And Godtopus knows there’s a shit-ton-O-O fans. Woman says you should read a particular book and sales go through the roof. Woman says you should buy something and sales go through the roof. Woman says this dude is smart, dude gets his own show. Woman wants a network, woman gets a network.

I don’t know what woman is going to do when she sees this:


Like him or not, dude has a point. I know some of you go nuts because he’s smug and liberal, and he is. But he also admits it. And then you have someone like Oprah who seems to like to think of herself in a certain way but puts on a show like this. Why isn’t that audience full of homeless kids or abused people who had to leave home? Why isn’t Oprah in some third world country giving someone else their favorite things instead of hers? If you’re managing to get yourself to the Oprah Show, I’m guessing you don’t need any of those things - you just want them. No one needs those things. So basically it’s just a day of celebrating Oprah sharing her rich shit with people who are already doing pretty well themselves. And you have to admit their reactions are pretty damned stupid.

Bill’s been dogging Oprah followers for quite some time now and in that regard, I think he hits the nail on the head. Like lemmings and with the enthusiasm usually reserved for a religious leader, people follow her Oprah-ness’s every word. I’ll be curious to see what, if any, response she makes.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Beauty of Being the Shepherd in the Play of Life | Christmas Lessons from Charlie Brown and George Bailey | Fruitcakes. Why'd It Have To Be Fruitcakes? | A Guide to Holiday Etiquette and Safety









Comments

In 2005, the audience for this show was made up of people who had volunteered to help after Hurricane Katrina in some way. Which was pretty cool. But I don't know if she's had a deserving audience since that time.

Posted by: Lemon Poundcake at December 23, 2010 5:23 PM

Like you say, dude has a point.

I would say to Bill though, this problem is not just limited to the USA.

Posted by: Simon at December 23, 2010 5:31 PM

I feel a bit bad for agreeing with Mr. Maher.

Posted by: Henry at December 23, 2010 5:32 PM

Why worship Oprah when Wendy Williams handed out a bottle of hooch, a box of chocolates, and the new Sony PSP? Retina burning TV screen that costs lots of money for more than two people to watch, or some Christmas spirits? Panini press, or non-stop ninja fighting action? Team small but practical gifts.

Unless someone wants to give me a new car with a hatchback or serious storage space. Then all bets are off. I'd act a damn fool on TV to get a car made after 1986 right now.

Posted by: Robert at December 23, 2010 5:47 PM

The truth is an uncomfortable thong in the ass crack of humanity.

Posted by: duckandcover at December 23, 2010 5:49 PM

Apparently, the audience this year was made up of people who had given back to their communities in meaningful ways. So, the audience was deserving.

Besides, Bill is taking it way too seriously. The woman is giving away free shit.

And the spirituality that she seems to support is of the self-help-"Secret"-new-Age type and not the Christian give-of-yourself-and-want-nothing type.

Posted by: Izzy at December 23, 2010 5:59 PM

“Why isn’t Oprah in some third world country giving someone else their favorite things instead of hers? If you’re managing to get yourself to the Oprah Show, I’m guessing you don’t need any of those things - you just want them.”

Cindy.


Cindy Cindy Cindy, when will you guys ever learn? First of all, those shows that Oprah do that involves giving away gifts, the audience is made up of volunteers that volunteer their time at soup kitchens and homeless shelters and women shelters and so forth and so on. Secondly, it always makes me laugh when a millionaire complains about a billionaire, because said billionaire spends her money making people happy. And thirdly, how do you know that those audience members are doing well? Did you interview any of the audience members to find out their financial situation? Fourth, Oprah opened two schools for girls in some of the poorest parts of Africa in 2007, if you had bothered to do any sort of research about Oprah before you wrote your article you would have known this. And on top of that, Oprah has Oprah’s Angel Network which assist charities and her network has raised over 45 million dollars for charity and none of the money raised went towards administration cost, all of the cost were covered by the charity 100%. I won’t even bother with telling you about all the money she has given kids to attend colleges within the African American community. I will admit she ain’t no Bill Maher. I mean not just anybody can become a millionaire by telling jokes.

Posted by: Pookie at December 23, 2010 6:00 PM

Wow that song at the end of the video was bangin'.

Hmm Bill Maher always gives me a lot to think about. Will be pondering over this video.

Posted by: grace b at December 23, 2010 6:03 PM

Oprah is kind of an easy target because she has kajillions of dollars and does what ever in the hot buttered fuck she feels like doing with it. Her show and her audiences look completely insane. But someone has to buy HDTV's for hundreds of people. Amiright? She is also not a saint or a deity so I am sure she can handle the criticism.

Bill Maher is brilliant and funny and can be somewhat of a sanctimonious asshole. That's his job and he does it well. He also ragged on Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert for their rally in D.C. He's our favorite liberal carmudgeon. (Sorry, Olbermann).

In short: It's just not that serious.

Posted by: greer at December 23, 2010 6:11 PM

Hey. Don't hate the player. Hate the game.

Posted by: junierizzle at December 23, 2010 6:14 PM

hmmm - a quick google says Bill is worth about 23 million. I think maybe he can keep his rich pie hole shut about people of moderate means enjoying some nice free stuff

Posted by: harleymom at December 23, 2010 6:18 PM

Pookie, you're focusing on the wrong thing. The point of Bill Maher's speech, and Cindy's subsequent post, is that we ('Mericans) focus too much on materialism. Is Oprah great? Yeah, sure. She's the bomb-diggity. But does her yearly best-of and subsequent give-away have anything to do with being a humanitarian and philanthropist? No, it sure doesn't. It has to do with celebrating material goods. Not just celebrating them, going buck-fucking-wild over the prospect of getting a bunch a free shit you don't need. Are those people in the audience maybe strapped for cash? Sure, who isn't? Are they good people who help their fellow man? Maybe. You can't be anymore certain of that than Cindy can be that they're living comfortably. Whatever their financial status, and whoever they are personally, one thing I (and Bill Mahr) know for sure is that not a single one of them need a 3D TV. Redirecting the focus to how great Oprah is doesn't really counter Mahr's argument that rampant materialism is akin to feverish spirituality, if the outward reactions are any indication.

Posted by: superasente at December 23, 2010 6:20 PM

Let's say the audience deserved the items due to some charitable deed. It doesn't mean they need to be crying and wailing over some kitchen tool, or whatever else she gives them. I do have to admit something like a car, or something similar would be pretty sweet, but not everything is "OMG OMG OMG (passes out)" worthy. Hell, I bought one of her cookbooks for under $4 and you didn't see me going crazy during the process.

Posted by: Matt at December 23, 2010 6:23 PM

On Bill: smug, self-serving asshole. I like many of his views, but he doesn't like to get called on any of his shit by others. For a comedian, he's got a very small sense of humor.

On Bill's take on Oprah: mostly right. Those shows are mostly masturbatory in nature, for Oprah and for her audience.

Posted by: Fredo at December 23, 2010 6:34 PM

I like Bill Mahr OK and he's not wrong about money and greed being most people's real religion, but I am sick of people ragging on Oprah (FYI, I don't watch her show).

Most people who don't live in third-world countries have more shit than they need. Oprah didn't invent excess and materialism, I don't even think her dumb "favorite things" show is the worst offender on that score, in terms of public figures or celebrities.

That, in my book, would be Donald Trump, or Donald Trump's public persona, which he seems to be very proud of.

Oprah may have tons of money, but she is small potatoes compared to the people who are really responsible for the cult of materialism in America: corporate America and (to some extent) the federal government, which enables corporate America in many, many ways. Oprah is an amateur in the realm of encouraging people to buy stuff they don't need. Seriously, she does this show once a year. The rest of the powers that be sell materialism 365 days a year, 24/7.

Posted by: Slash at December 23, 2010 6:40 PM

I have no doubt that if you went to a poor village in some third world country, and the people had the energy, you would see them going buckwild for the free food.

Posted by: donna at December 23, 2010 6:44 PM

They are going crazy over the 'material goods,' but they have an obligation to cause it's TV and they're getting free stuff.

If you were watching this episode and saw a bunch of seated and quiety gracious people just accepting the enormous piles of gifts from Oprah, you'd be saying how they are a bunch of ingrates and should be over the moon to receive such great things and should be jumping up and down about it.

I'd much rather watch people who were happy to be there and acknowledging their insanely good luck/good karma/good timing with screaming and hand waving than people like Bill who take it for granted.

Posted by: Gilligiggle at December 23, 2010 6:45 PM

The fact that we get excited over material things means that we doing just fine. Should we be thankful that we get to eat food everyday? Yes we should. But people in Ethiopia are more thankful then we are because they don't have it as much. So, whats the solution Bill Maher? Should we sacrifice our good lives just so we don't obsess over material things? No, we shouldn't. Stop acting high and mighty because it makes your followers act high and mighty. I can't stand Oprah one bit. But I like the fact that I live in a country where my toughest decision is whether I should buy an LCD or Plasma screen television. That does not mean something is wrong with this country. So because other places in the world are suffering means that we should suffer also? Of course no one NEEDS a 3D TV. But this country allows us to WANT things that we don't need. There is a certain beauty in that idea. Merry Christmas.

Posted by: Eric at December 23, 2010 6:45 PM

Good on them folks if they did something to deserve the reward, and some small good on Oprah et al for giving it. But sure as shit those "worthy" folks were screened not just for their compassion, but for their propensity to lose their shit for the television audience. Same way contestants on The Price is Right are selected.

All in all, it comes off as disingenuous to me, much like LeBron James' announcement done at the Boys and Girls Club in effort to make the King seem like a saint.

Posted by: really at December 23, 2010 6:53 PM

"Let's say the audience deserved the items due to some charitable deed. It doesn't mean they need to be crying and wailing over some kitchen tool, or whatever else she gives them."

I agree that the audience reactions were stupid. But I doubt it was just greed. Before all the fun started there was probably a producer telling everyone that the ones shown on TV would be those who showed "real, heartfelt emotion". And you know how people love seeing their pieholes on TV. Also, I imagine a lot of it was just a snowballing effect, if you got the girl on the left and the guy on the right losing their shit, its a lot easier to lose your shit too.

Posted by: EricD at December 23, 2010 6:53 PM

Whilst I agree that it's not that serious, I enjoyed Pookie's defence.

Posted by: Peter G at December 23, 2010 6:53 PM

I've only seen Oprah's show once, maybe 10 years ago, but it just happened to be one of her "very special shows."

She gave an all expenses-paid trip for a month to Europe, all major ports of call for two, to a woman who had lost her three children to a murder-suicide by her ex-husband about a year earlier. The woman's friend contacted Oprah,related how her friend's life had been utterly destroyed and Oprah delivered.

I totally lost my shit and sobbed like a baby. Manipulation? Oh yea.

Posted by: NeoCleo at December 23, 2010 7:09 PM

Superasente, I understand well Bill’s point, and I also understand your point. Yes, theoretically nobody in the audience needed a 3D TV, except for those people that make a living by making those 3D TV’s. Materialism is always being preached by people that can afford materialistic things. Bill and his 6000 square foot glass house that was designed by a student of Frank Lloyd Wright with the two guest houses and the batting cage tucked into a 2.5 acre compound in Beverly Hills. Oh but he does drive a prius hybrid, which means he keeps it real. I don’t mind being preached to about the ills of materialism, but not by some millionaire funny man that lust after weed and has his own late night TV show.

Posted by: Pookie at December 23, 2010 7:26 PM

I love me some material goods. Call me shallow. And I'm grateful that someone took on the time-consuming task of sorting thru countless panini presses to find me the best one. Think of all the time I saved, buying, assembling, testing panini presses, only to find the don't meet my stringent requirements for sandwich makers.

God bless her.

And to those people that are bitching about her not helping third world countries, well they hardly have the materials to make a decent panini, do they? Well then what the fuck are they going to do with a panini maker?

Meditate on THAT.

Posted by: ZombieMedic at December 23, 2010 7:37 PM

Bill Maher is an asshole, but he's the asshole who says things that tend to be a springboard for interesting debates. I don't think I could stand hanging around him, but we need assholes sometimes.

As for this "But I like the fact that I live in a country where my toughest decision is whether I should buy an LCD or Plasma screen television. That does not mean something is wrong with this country." It's all contextual, you, me, maybe 70% of the readers of this website are comfortable enough to where those types of decisions are our toughest decisions most days. But there are tons of people in this country who have to make much tougher ones, about the most needs. Either it's a catharsis to watch people get amazing things, or it just provides stark relief to your own situation. And the question is, does the focus on materialism create a culture striving towards these things too much?

Posted by: e at December 23, 2010 7:40 PM

And all my typos managed to make what I said nearly unreadable, I humbly leave good people.

Posted by: e at December 23, 2010 7:41 PM

“e” You are do right. I’m in the process of trying to decided between a Plasma and a LCD. On the one hand the Plasma cost less and has the highest refresh rates of all HDTV’s. But the Plasma does have burn-in issues, and now the new LCD’s have a pretty high refresh rate of 240hz but cost more than the Plasma. So you can see the predicament I’m in.

Posted by: Pookie at December 23, 2010 7:50 PM

*so*

Posted by: Pookie at December 23, 2010 7:51 PM

Pookie, I just don't think the argument is invalid because the person making the argument might be flirting with hypocracy. In debate, it's a flawed tactic to attack the person making the argument in an effort to discredit the argument itself (ad hominem). The messenger should have no value; only the argument has value. Bill Mahr's point is sound, even though he's a douche.

Posted by: superasente at December 23, 2010 8:39 PM

Yes, the audience this year was made up of deserving volunteers but I believe she also mentioned that some of the people were, " some of my number one fans". I think she can give away what she wants and to whoever but that made me snort with laughter when I heard that. Contrast the people there who are making a difference in the world with the people there who are there because they just hang on everything Oprah says, read what she reads and buy what she says to buy.

Posted by: Sar at December 23, 2010 8:57 PM

I don't care if these people are volunteers or not. I don't care if they helped people in their towns or citys. They acted like freaks because some rich woman was giving away stuff. If they were actually people that helped others...they wouldn't have acted that way at all, because they would know about the people that are really hurting in this country. This is just a big version of Price is Right game show.

Posted by: patrick at December 23, 2010 10:36 PM

This is why I said "those types of decisions", no I am not purchasing a large TV. But most days, my decisions are not about putting food on the table or paying my rent. I'm only just getting by, but I have a stable job, and mediocre health insurance, that was the point.

Posted by: e at December 23, 2010 10:51 PM

Better yet...

who. fucking. cares.

Posted by: Lennon at December 23, 2010 11:47 PM

Here is what the audience got this year:

-A Course in Weight Loss: 21 Spiritual Lessons for Surrendering Your Weight Forever, a book by Marianne Williamson, published by Hay House
-Andre Walker hair care products
-Baker's Edge lasagna and brownie trays with Ghiradelli brownie mix
-Beecher's "World's Best" macaroni and cheese
-Breville panini press from Williams-Sonoma
-Decoded, a book by Jay-Z
-Elfa Customizable Closet System from The Container Store
-A five-year membership to Netflix
-Judith Ripka Eclipse Earrings
-$100 gift card for Kiva
-Kyocera Advanced Ceramic knife 2 piece knife giftset
-Lafco House and Home Collection Candle Set
-Limited edition "25th Anniversary" Oprah watch by Philip Stein
-Ralph Lauren Cashmere Sweater & Cashmere Blanket
-Lululemon relaxed fit pants
-Four pairs of Nike running shoes
-Nikon D3100 digital camera
-7-day cruise on the Allure of the Seas from Royal Caribbean International
-Round-trip flight on United Airlines to and from the cruise

A "25th Anniversary" Oprah shirt
-Sony Bravia 52-inch 3D television and blu-ray player
-The Beginning, an album from The Black Eyed Peas
-Tory Burch "Silver Anniversary" tote bag and flat shoes
-iPad, with Scrabble app
-UGG Australia sparkle boots
-A Coach satchel
-Magaschoni tunic and leggings
-Hope in a Jar moisturizer by Philosophy
-Nordstrom lingerie and $500 Nordstrom gift card
-Prepara Herb Saver Prepara
-Chicken pot pie from Centerville Pie Company
-Garrett Popcorn Shops "Oprah's Favorite Things" tin
-Le Creuset cookware
-Miraclesuit blue jeans
-A jewelry box from Pottery Barn
-Jessica Leigh Diamond earrings from Dana Rebecca Designs
-A gift card for DonorsChoose.org
-Mini croissants from Williams-Sonoma
-Talbott Teas holiday assortment
-The Book of Awakening, a book by Mark Nepo
-Illuminations, an album from Josh Groban
-Let It Be Me, an album from Johnny Mathis
-A 2012 Volkswagen Beetle, due for delivery May 2011

GOD GODTOPUS IN HEAVEN I WOULD SHRIEK AND FLAIL MIGHTILY FOR HER OPRAHIGHNESS IF SHE WOULD BE BESTOW THIS AWESOME SWAG ON TO ME HELLS YEAH MOTHERFUCCKA!!!1!!1

Posted by: Lola at December 24, 2010 1:16 AM

I think I'd rather have the cash equivalent of all of that.

Posted by: Uda at December 24, 2010 2:10 AM

One year the audience was made up of teachers. Since I be a teacher, she good with me.

Posted by: superEdna at December 24, 2010 2:13 AM

Pookie, can you direct you to this post on Bitch blogs as to why this whole shenanigan carried out by Oprah is just a tad bit suspect?

Posted by: Sho at December 24, 2010 3:26 AM

Can *I

(Eff my grammar nazi-ness.)

Posted by: Sho at December 24, 2010 3:26 AM

I just wanted to say that the header pic of Bill Maher giving the finger is twelve sorts of awesome. One day that will be my profile picture on FaceBook.

That is all.

Posted by: a disturbingly large amount of poo at December 24, 2010 7:03 AM

Just so you folks know, it has already been said that the swag that Oprah doles out to her audience is not by any means obtained with any of her income. It is given by the companies involved as promotional material. And for the most part, it's no skin off the companies' collective nose to do so. For them it's win-win situation. They get free advertising and publicity that helps promote their merchandise in front of millions of potential buyers and Oprah comes off deified by her audience- St. Oprah; Patron Saint of Shit We Don't Need. It's been proven that any bit that she flashes on her show becomes an instant bestseller. I have no doubt that if she declared the next big thing was steaming horsepucky on a bun, by the next week McDonald's would be rolling out the McShitt and hoards of her fans would be munching on it.

The best trick Winfrey's pulled off was making the act of shilling samples of overpriced garbage look like an act of kindness. If she were truly the giving soul she makes herself out to be, she would forgo this nonsense and take her cameras and her own money to shelters. Show the ignorant masses that are her audiences the real horrors that people go through everyday. And instead of the latest useless baubles, maybe she'd give in the form of food, clothing or even training for people to get the ability to provide from themselves.

You say the members of the audience are teachers? Here's an idea, how about paying their basic utilities for a year since many teachers' salaries are impossible to live on. Why not make a donation to their school district so that they may continue doing good. How the fuck does a food processor a Netfilx membership or a book by Jay-Z change anything?

Oprah Winfrey is a the worst kind of sell-out whore; the kind that pretends to be something other than what she is. As an added insult she actually has the ability to be that great humanitarian and philanthropist she works so hard at merely pretending to be. I don't know which is more insulting, her masquerade or the mass consumption of this shit sandwich millions in her lemming audience do with a smile on their faces.

Posted by: bleujayone at December 24, 2010 10:52 AM

Sho, Superasente, et al.

Your arguments against Oprah would be valid if Maher would have railed against every game show in the history of TV which gives away shit which causes people to lose their shit. See when I was a little Pookie my mom and I would watch the Price is Fucking Right. Every day Barker would come on stage and call out names and those people would jump and shout and run their asses up to the stage and hopefully pick the price of a certain item. Now those motherfuckers would lose their shit six ways to Sunday and nobody said a goddamn thing. Barker was the pied piper of giving motherfuckers shit that they earned by calling out a right number, not by volunteering somewhere mind you, but by guessing the right cost of a fucking pool table. Now Oprah comes along and starts giving motherfuckers all kinds of shit and all of a sudden people start questioning her motives and shit. But nobody had a problem with Barker giving away shit for thirty years. At the very least Maher is a fucking hypocrite, and at the most he’s a fucking miserable rich prick that has a problem with Oprah showing appreciation to a bunch of people that volunteer at trying to make people’s lives a little bit better.

Posted by: Pookie at December 24, 2010 11:00 AM

I watched and then started thinking, “Maybe Bill Maher is not the insufferable asshole I take him to be.” But thanks to these much-wiser-less-gullible-than-I commenters, yeah, maybe Bill Maher is the insufferable asshole I take him to be.

Thank you, Pajiba support group.

Posted by: Jerry Kenney at December 24, 2010 11:31 AM

Oprah Winfrey is a the worst kind of sell-out whore; the kind that pretends to be something other than what she is. As an added insult she actually has the ability to be that great humanitarian and philanthropist she works so hard at merely pretending to be. I don't know which is more insulting, her masquerade or the mass consumption of this shit sandwich millions in her lemming audience do with a smile on their faces.

Posted by: bleujayone at December 24, 2010 10:52 AM

bleujayjone, she is indeed a great humanitarian and a philanthropist. You probably wouldn’t know about all the millions she has given to Historically Black Colleges and all the millions she has given to students to attend those colleges. And she has opened up learning academies in the poor parts of Africa, and she has her own charitable organization which helps homeless people and sick people to get on their feet. And she has an organization that helps abused women. But then I guess she isn’t a charter member of the Sierra Club so I can understand your displeasure of her.

Posted by: Pookie at December 24, 2010 11:32 AM

Good call on the Oprah part, but Maher's blanket contempt for christians makes me grind my teeth.

Posted by: Sunsneezer at December 24, 2010 12:05 PM

To be clear, I have no problem with Oprah. None at all. She seems like a good person -- not like a "Oh look, I'm Bono and I single handedly saved Africa by discovering the perfect musical tone to eradicate the aids, which you can find in my new techo-album 'U2, Seriously We're Pretty Great' sold for $17.99 in all Walmart locations" kind-of awesome, but like a "Sir, you look cold -- here's my coat" awesome.

But that isn't the point. At all. How great of a person Oprah is or how huge of a douche Bill Mahr is shouldn't influence the argument one way or the other. The argument being: People lose their shit over material objects like people lose their shit over God, making greed and materialism like another religion. Pray to the almighty Sony.

If you rewatch the video, Bill Mahr is chastizing the entire cultural phenomenon, not Oprah. He used some clips from the Oprah show as a recent source to site his displeasure, but the entire video is interspersed with clips from past game-shows as well as religious meetings. The one comment he makes in direct criticism of Oprah is something like, "Oprah says her show is about spiriturality, but if that were true shouldn't she be telling her audience to sit down and stop loosing their shit over a sweater." It's not a bad point (and he's not exactly criticizing her philanthopic acts or calling her a hypocrite).

Defending Oprah is pointless because she hasn't been insulted or challanged.

We have.

Posted by: superasente at December 24, 2010 12:26 PM

You can’t measure materialism nor can you measure a person that is materialistic. Theoretically speaking, anything more than bread and water to survive is being materialistic. Using a computer to debate is being somewhat materialistic, using a computer at home no less is being materialistic. In some parts of the world a glass of orange juice in the morning is a luxury, but to those people that don’t have it they might consider us as being materialistic when a glass of water would do the same job. People lose their shit everyday over the most least important things. A father loses his shit at his daughters wedding, grown men lose their shit when their favorite team wins or lose. Whatever god people pray to when something good or bad happens shouldn’t be ridiculed.

Posted by: Pookie at December 24, 2010 12:55 PM

I agree that establishing a universal sense of materialism is impossible. Some could argue that materialism isn't even necessarily a value for material things. Why can't materialism extend to value of pleasurable sensations or foods? If I engorge myself on a hearty, exotic meal and then bed my sexy wife before sleeping until noon, aren't I indulging in the material world over the spiritual world? So yeah, trying to objectively pinpoint what is "too much" materialism is a futile act.

What we can do -- what Mahr has done -- is to evaluate materialism relative to American culture. In the contex of America's history with the acquisition of material things and the accumulation of wealth, it's pretty safe to say that we are living in meterialistic times. We indulge in overfeeding. We are over-sexed (is such a thing possible -- my wife thinks so). We collect things until our homes are literally bursting at the seams. We are devoted the newest technology, the biggest TV, the biggest homes. We overindulge. Our way of life is built around overindulging.

So no, there is no concrete way to say, "This person is materialistic" because relative to some other guy from some other culture we all could be labeled that way. Just like some guy from a hunter/gatherer society could be labeled a "materialist" for wanting to sleep on a pile of wet leaves rather than on the hard earth (what a pussy!). All we can do is to compare our current state of materialism with the last generation and/or with others in our culture.

That being said, I don't think he was exactly criticizing the exhuberant reactions of the people in the clips. Rather, the motivation for those reactions. It's not like he was saying, "Don't freak out over exciting shit." More like, "If you gotta freak out, at least do it for something with real value (family/friends)."

Posted by: superasente at December 24, 2010 1:29 PM

Yes Superasente, by all means lets evaluate materialism relative to American culture. lets all retire to Maher’s 6000 square foot glass house with the two guest cottages and the swimming pools and the batting cages that he uses to work out the stress that he gets from sitting home writing jokes for his three months out of a year TV gig. Let us wait for Maher to walk out onto his marble veranda of his 2 ½ acre Beverly Hills compound and preach to the common folk about the evils of materialism. And once Maher finishes sending out his edicts, he came go back inside and contemplate on his next subject while he waits for his noon meal of sushi to be prepared by his private chef no doubt. And upon completion of his noon meal he can go upstairs and lay on his California king with the one million count Egyptian silk sheets and do some more of that contemplation stuff.

Seriously Superasente, I would have had more respect for Maher if he had done the speech that “Scarface” gave at the restaurant.

Posted by: Pookie at December 24, 2010 2:03 PM

His argument is no less valid just because he's wealthy. You wouldn't argue that global warming isn't really happening just because Al Gore flew to the premiere of An Inconvenient Truth in his private jet, right? Right. So why should it matter how much money Bill Mahr has? The idea that our nation has been overcome with rampant, greedy materialism is still valid.

Posted by: superasente at December 24, 2010 2:20 PM

I believe in global warming because too many scientist that have studied it say the earth’s temperature is indeed warming. And with 10% unemployment which is really about 17-20% and the unprecedented number of families that are now homeless because of an economic tsunami that hit us I’d say that you might want to rethink greed being rampant. The phrase “Greed is Good” wasn’t coined by some truck driver, it was coined by some fictional character that might as well have been a real life stockbroker. But my problem with Maher and other rich people is that they want to preach the evils of materialism like they’ve been hit by a bolt of enlightenment. When in fact the only bolt they’ve been hit by contains many zeros. It’s so easy for people with money to preach to people that don’t have money. Trust me, the only thing that Maher is upset about is the Oprah beat him to the punch. I’ll make a deal with you Sup, lets not let people with TV shows dictate how we should live. G-String Divas is excluded of course.

Posted by: Pookie at December 24, 2010 2:51 PM

i'm with you on this one superasente. keep at it!

Posted by: splinter at December 24, 2010 3:38 PM

I am appalled by Maher's behavior.

Isn't flipping off Oprah inherently racist?

Or at the very least lard-intolerant?

Maher went insane shortly after learning that he couldn't get laid even at the Playboy Mansion.

You go, Oprah!

"Why isn’t Oprah in some third world country giving someone else their favorite things instead of hers?"

Because she is a visionary who realizes that with the United States' debt THIRTEEN TRILLION DOLLARS AND RISING, soon she won't have to leave Chicago to be in a third world country.

I adore Oprah. She proves to those of us gals who are unattractive and untalented that one of our own can soar right to the top.

Posted by: Esther Heyman at December 24, 2010 7:59 PM

pookie = Gail?

Posted by: gkchump at December 25, 2010 4:13 PM

Hmmm, Maximus did a scathing article on Oprah and for the love of bitchiness I can't remember the word he used to describe her. Anyone remember or know?

It gives me the chills on how much abject devotion people heap on her. I mean, case in point, Esther seems to hint at her apparent need to be a follower at the church of O. @ Esther: Do you find satisfaction in feeding off someone's ego? Her apparent need to be branded as the "kindest person in the world."

Posted by: tallulahc at December 25, 2010 5:30 PM

Exactly, tallulhac.

My satisfaction is derived in feeding off Oprah's ego, just as my nourishment is derived by feeding off your flesh.

Oprah's success is proof that Americans crave mediocrity, which also explains the success of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

If you want to connect with the Middle America, just spew shopworn cliches and smile like a mannequin.

I can name a hundred intelligent things that George Carlin said, but not a single one uttered by Winfrey.

Posted by: Esther Heyman at December 25, 2010 9:59 PM

Oh Fuck Oprah.....the oddest part was the actual Kato Kaelin sighting in the end party video!

Posted by: Old Guy at December 27, 2010 9:05 AM