web
counter
 

BBC/PBS Fans Will Either Embrace It, or Choke a B*tch

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (31)



martinfreemanbilbo.jpg

I was never a fan of the Granada Television “Sherlock Holmes” series with Jeremy Brett, which probably makes me some sort of philistine. Mrs. Pajiba-hyphenate has seen them all something like half-a-dozen times, and the DVDs seem to alternative between her family members every Christmas. I’ve been subjected to them on numerous occasions, but there’s something a little too stuffy about them for me to connect with.

Which is to say: I won’t be bothered by the reboot. In fact, I’m enthusiastic about it, if only because Martin Freeman* (Shaun of the Dead, BBC’s “The Office”) will be taking over the Dr. Watson role. Freeman never quite caught on as a big-screen actor, and I think this will suit him just fine.

The new take on the series will update it for the 21st century. I’m not entirely sure what that means — my guess is that it will be the PBS version of Guy Ritchie’s Sherlock Holmes, but given just how conservative PBS is, I wouldn’t expect a huge shift. Don’t get your knickers in a twist — it won’t be some hyper-fueled “CSI” with a brawny Holmes and a sexpot Watson. It probably just means a new cast, and better lighting, and maybe a few more witticisms.

British actor Benedict Cumberbatch, from Atonement and Starter for 10 has been cast as Holmes. He looks like this:

Benedict Cumberbatch (.jpg

It may also interest BBC fans to know that they’re remaking the high-society British soap, “Upstairs/Downstairs,” as well.

*This would also suggest that Freeman, as once rumored, will not be cast as the lead in the new Hobbit film.

(Source: THR)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Ghost Writer Review | "The Tonight Show" Announces Its First Weeks of Guests









Comments

Tim! Martin Freeman owns a little piece of my heart and will forever. I'd watch this.

Posted by: becks at February 23, 2010 3:37 PM

Tiiiiiiim! I will watch this, oh yes.

Posted by: Julie at February 23, 2010 3:42 PM

Cumberbatch?!

...

...

Posted by: Jerce at February 23, 2010 3:50 PM

alternative or alternate?

Posted by: jim of the lower case at February 23, 2010 3:59 PM

Not just Cumberbatch, Benedict Cumberbatch! Now that's a name.

Posted by: MM at February 23, 2010 4:10 PM

Wasn't Cumberbatch the one who punched Mark Kermode?

Posted by: nevin at February 23, 2010 4:20 PM

MARTIN FREEMAN MUST PLAY BILBO.

Actually I just posted on Pajiba Love that Matthew Goode auditioned for Bilbo. So, maybe? I want this damned thing to get cast, alredy.

Posted by: figgy at February 23, 2010 4:21 PM

The whole point of the Jeremy Brett one's were that they were stuffy. It was Victorian England for Godtopus sake. The last time they set Sherlock Holmes in "modern times" were those awful Basil Rathbone sequel ones.

I really don't see how setting Sherlock Holmes in modern times is going to work. The whole point was that there was no CSI or private detectives back then. Holmes was one of a kind. Setting it in modern times would make him just another private dick with a cocaine habit. (I almost wrote cocaine halibut.)

Nobody names their kids Benedict Cumberbatch anymore. It's so Basil Rathbone.

Posted by: BWeaves at February 23, 2010 4:47 PM

[scans production notes and list of writers]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherlock_(TV_series)

Stephen Moffat again, that man is busy.

Moffat + Freeman= hope.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at February 23, 2010 5:34 PM

Mmm, cocaine halibut...

You know, my first exposure to Matthew Goode was those retarded trailers for that retarded movie he did with Amy Adams, so I dismissed him in my mind. But I recently saw A Single Man (with my new buddy welldressed -- watching movies with fellow Pajibans is TEH OSSOM!!!) and was surprised by how likeable he was in that small role. I actually think he'd make a great Bilbo.

That said, I'd love to see this retread of Holmes do well.

Posted by: Jelinas at February 23, 2010 5:46 PM

Holmes drove both Robert Stephens and Jeremy Brett mad, RDJ was already a bit crazy and he's only done one movie so far... so I guess we'll see.

Benedict Cumberbatch to go insane in 5... 4... 3..

Posted by: Vi at February 23, 2010 6:36 PM

You know I, Claudius is next, right? I assume.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at February 23, 2010 9:44 PM

I was like, jeezy creezy that Cumberbatch kid looks way too familiar to me, and then I realized he has been in TWO James McAvoy vehicles (as Dustin mentioned above). Ah, obsessive repeat viewings, how I love thee.

He's great at the sneer and snide, I think he'll do well as Holmes. And TIM!!!!

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 23, 2010 9:47 PM

Martin Freeman played Arthur Dent in the recent Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Is that movie verboten around here? I can't keep track. Anyways, I thought he was excellent in that movie, so I will be glad to see more of Tim.

Posted by: llp at February 24, 2010 12:09 AM

They're remaking "Upstairs Downstairs"? Is nothing sacred? (Scratch that. I've lurked here too long not to know that was a rhetorical question.)

Posted by: cinekat at February 24, 2010 4:42 AM

jeremy brett... was magnificent.

Posted by: kikz at February 24, 2010 10:33 AM

1. Upstairs, Downstairs is very early 70's looking. I wouldn't turn down an update if it was done well.

2. I, Claudius is also very 70's looking, with cheap sets and costumes, even though the acting is top notch. I wouldn't turn down an update if it ended up looking like Rome did. I even think Derek Jacobi could still play the part of Claudius as an old man. They could even CGI the wrinkles out of him to play young Claudius.

3. On the other hand, Jeremy Brett's Sherlock Holmes was dead on perfect. No improvements necessary. It gave me the Holmes and Watson I saw in my head when I read the books and was very period acurate.

Posted by: BWeaves at February 24, 2010 12:34 PM

yes, Dustin, you're a philistine. the Jeremy Brett Holmes series was magnificent and not really that stuffy (plenty of episodes had some real subversive elements).

That said, I'm not pre-hating on the reboot. I will observe cautiously. BBC folks usually do a good job, except when they don't (see: Robin Hood).

Posted by: grenadine at February 24, 2010 1:50 PM

Okay, I will try this with caution. Because while Jeremy Brett is my ultimate Holmes, I did shamelessly enjoy the Guy Ritchie jaunt, and wouldn't feel guilty about enjoying yet another reinterpretation. That said, I will be approaching with caution particularly because the Ritchie endeavor totally bribed me with steampunk paraphernalia, and if this series is going to offer something else, it had better be good enough for me to invest beyond the simple "we've got the character down". Because that aspect is still entirely tied to Brett for me, no matter what.

Posted by: Kate at February 24, 2010 6:10 PM

Jeremy Brett was brilliant as Holmes - enough that I didn't notice the change in Watson until the second time through. I however have no objections to a reboot. Christian Bale pulled it off, Chris Pine pulled it off. It can be done.

Upstairs, Downstairs is no big deal to me. I found it pretty dull (I never was enamored with the Edwardian Era anyway). They want to play with Poirot, go for it. I, Claudius would be wonderful!

But if those yahoos think they're going to try anything EVER with Inspector Morse, they'll never see another dime of mine!

Posted by: funtime42 at February 24, 2010 9:34 PM

I don't spend much time at my computer and have never before posted a comment.(stage fright) But, when I heard that Masterpiece was going to be messing with SH, I had to look into the matter. I am so pleased to see that I'm not alone!! Like Kate, I cannot perceive of a Holmes other than Bret, although I also shamelessly enjoyed the Ritchie version. (It was the Downey element that did it for me.) I will attempt to give the redo a chance. (Bret lost it over the Holmes role? I thought it was the loss of his wife. Do tell.)

And, I also agree... Never, ever, EVER mess with Endeavor.

Posted by: Sarah at April 26, 2010 12:07 AM

Uhm... that was quite interesting :)

Posted by: lavoro da casa at November 18, 2010 1:47 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think...

Posted by: instantempo at November 19, 2010 10:36 AM

some times its a pain in the ass to read what website owners wrote but this website is rattling user friendly ! .

Posted by: Marcia at December 12, 2010 3:52 AM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Elmer Fitzen at January 5, 2011 9:52 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Jim Urps at January 6, 2011 5:52 AM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 17, 2011 2:35 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading system at January 18, 2011 11:13 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading system at January 19, 2011 6:51 AM

The only place you'll find success before work is in the dictionary

Posted by: repeat diflucan at February 14, 2011 2:06 PM

Many thanks for your time to have decided to put these things together on this site. John and that i very much treasured your insight through the articles on certain things. I recognize that you have several demands on your schedule and so the fact that you took just as much time just like you did to help people just like us by means of this article is even highly valued.

Posted by: fare soldi at March 2, 2011 9:10 AM