web
counter
 

Avengers: Assembled

By TK | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (16)



hulk_gms061508.jpg

This is more of a confirmation than news, but because I’m an obsessed nerd, you all get to read about it anyway, so cram it.

Kevin Feige, the president of Marvel Studios, was interviewed for the next issue of SFX magazine and had a good bit to say about the future of The Avengers, as well as its members. He mentions that they’re introducing some new characters in Iron Man 2 (like Scarlett Johanssen’s Black Widow, who we’re collectively hoping won’t be a travesty), and that

… it’s not about just cramming in lots of new people; that’s sort of the cardinal sin of the sequel — adding in too many characters. This is totally Tony Stark’s story. And that’s gonna weave into Thor’s story, and Steve Rogers’ story, and it’s already ingrained with Nick Fury’s story and an organization known as S.H.I.E.L.D.”

But the real money quote is this one:

“My only concern is that when we launch a franchise — whichever character’s franchise that may be — it should stand on its own two feet … So by the time ‘The Avengers’ comes in 2012, it’s not just a team superhero movie with a bunch of characters with powers. It’s three people — four including the Hulk; five including Nick Fury — who you’ve seen before in other movies, coming together for the very first time.”

This is outstanding news for two reasons: 1) it re-affirms Marvel’s commitment to not make the same mistakes made in X-Men III — too many characters, abandoning character histories, etc (or let Fox Studios get even near it, or let Ratner direct, or, you know, just general all-purpose sucking). It reaffirms their intention to give a full history to each major character with their own feature movie, building up the universe to reflect how each hero interacts with the world, and show how the world interacts with them. There is also a wee hint that there will be other members — Captain America is a virtual must, and I suppose Black Widow isn’t a bad guess either.

And, it includes the Hulk. I confess, I was sort of nervous about that (and still am). I find myself surprisingly fond of Edward Norton’s Bruce Banner, and was hoping he’d make it into the film (although after an allegedly difficult time shooting The Incredible Hulk, there’s no guarantee he would reclaim the role). The future of the Hulk as a franchise is a little less solid — Feige said later that “That would be post-‘Avengers,’ if it happened … I think there’s a chance. It’s certainly our intention to use the same actors from film to film where we can.”

(h/t to Superherohype)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Saw VII vs. Paranormal Activity 2 | Bitter is the New Black Review









Comments

Ed Norton was extremely watchable as Bruce. Let's just hope someone drives a dump truck full of money up to his house.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at January 28, 2010 12:02 AM

But who's gonna play Mrs. Peel?

Posted by: , at January 28, 2010 12:35 AM

This is sorta dream like. Doesn't feel real. Could you imagine if they actually pull it off, what it could do? How it could effect the narrative structure of main stream film? Install an Orwellian styled governing body the sees over film. Studios become networks. Films become installments, continuing monthly, or bi-monthly an ongoing story being milked for their star potential, spinning wheels, loosing story. Serialization of film in a new extreme. Television would become an obsolete, commercial box.

Movie spin offs? Every character, good or bad, we've ever been exposed to now has the potential to then be mined for their own films and thus forming interconnected film universes. Soon characters from separate universes will be written into crossovers into other movie universes. Transformers and Alien v.s. Robert Downey Junior Sherlock Holmes, Seth Rogen Super Bad Cop, and Robert Downey Junior Iron Man, in 3-D, D-Boxed. This will grow show so huge, and uncontrollable that at some point lines will begin blending and we will have one meta-movie universe. 85 dollars a ticket to see A Micheal Bay, Stephen Spielberg, and George Lucas present, a Cohen Brothers, Duplass Brothers, and Farrely Brothers comedey, written by Zak Penn. Then Zak Penn is movie universe God, and we are all in deep, deep trouble.

Can't wait for Iron Man 2. Scarlett got that booty! Ya' know what I'm saying? ;)

Posted by: Brian at January 28, 2010 12:44 AM

Yeah, (comma), this kind of Avengers is new to me. But I pretty much just watched PBS as a kid, so.

Posted by: ziggy at January 28, 2010 12:51 AM

Christ, I want this movie to work. It's taking every ounce of my being to not be cynical about it. Thor, Iron Man and Captain America fighting the Hulk (in MY movie, anyway) would be epic.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at January 28, 2010 1:01 AM

ziggy,

Little present for you:

theavengers.tv/forever/images/queenofsin.jpg

Posted by: , at January 28, 2010 1:02 AM

"This is more of a confirmation than news, but because I’m an obsessed nerd, you all get to read about it anyway, so cram it. 'Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.' is a grammatically correct sentence used as an example of how homonyms and homophones can be used to create complicated constructs. It has been discussed in literature since 1972 when the sentence was used by William J. Rapaport, an associate professor at the University at Buffalo. It was posted to Linguist List by Rapaport in 1992. It was also featured in Steven Pinker's 1994 book The Language Instinct."

This is great TK but what does it have to do with the Avengers? Misleading title is misleading.

Cheers.

Posted by: Adventureman at January 28, 2010 1:07 AM

Apparently Adventureman is getting into EE again.

Kudos.

Insomnia is tits.

Posted by: Thurgod at January 28, 2010 5:21 AM

I missed Dr. Henry Pym in all this. He doesn't deserve his own movie, but he is a core member of the team, isn't he?

Posted by: hater from siloam springs at January 28, 2010 8:37 AM

This whole thing makes me vaguely uneasy. I mean, I'm excited and all, but this is like watching old people make out. You're hoping it all comes together for everyone's sake, but you're pretty sure you're just going to be hiding your eyes from it before long.

Posted by: superasente at January 28, 2010 8:40 AM

*happydance*

Posted by: Chickaboom at January 28, 2010 9:49 AM

I'm still waiting to find out who the fuck is playing Captain America. He was my favorite comic character growing up and if they fuck it up...well, let's just say I'm really hoping they don't fuck it up. Last I heard they were looking at an actor who is 5'9". 5'9"...Cap is fucking 6'4"!

Posted by: DeistBrawler at January 28, 2010 10:42 AM

They're probably scouting for a 5'9" actor for the "before" Steve Rogers. They're definitely doing the origin story, leaning on the crutch of "wimpy teen gains powers, finds place in the world." In sharp contrast to what everybody wants to see, of course, which is simply Captain America fighting the Red Skull in WWII, going into suspended animation, & waking up in The Avengers.

Posted by: the new transported man at January 28, 2010 12:01 PM

@ deistbrawler:

you forget how short everyone in Hollywood is...RDJ is 5'8" at the tallest. Cheadle is no taller than that. If the guy they get for Cap is even close to 6" he'll look like Andre the freaking giant compared to these guys.

Posted by: jason at January 28, 2010 2:41 PM

Sooo...Triple H?

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at January 28, 2010 2:49 PM

(comma)
Dude, If I'd seen that picture when I was 10 I'd be ruined for other women for life. Diana Rigg was the shit as Emma Peel.

Posted by: Dave at January 28, 2010 7:09 PM