free counter with statistics Arranged Marriage Reality Show | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

pbride02.jpeg
Mawage is wot bwings us togeder tooday

Reality Show Screws with the “Sanctity” of Marriage / Dustin Rowles

Trade News | February 3, 2009 | Comments (32)


There have been quite a few truly odious reality shows over the last decade (enough, really, to warrant its own Seriously Random List). Can you even remember when “Who Wants to Marry My Dad?” was considered barrel scraping repugnance? Nobody would think twice about that show now, unless the father was transgendered and nobody informed the suitors (of course, that idea was already attempted in the UK with disastrous, litigation-intensive results).

Anyway, CBS is picking up its own entry into the mess with people’s reality reality shows; this one deals with arranged marriages. In it, four adults apparently incapable of finding a spouse on their own are fixed up by the producers with a wife or husband. It’s not an actual contest (it doesn’t appear); rather, cameras will follow the four couples’ marriage and, you know, see how it works out for them. So, basically, CBS et. al. are going to make a mockery of marriage, but since (presumably) none of the contestants will be homosexual, the conservatives will leave it alone. You know, because the definition of marriage is a union between one man and one woman — there is absolutley no requirement that the man and woman love each other or, really, knew each other before they met during the ceremony.

Granted, I’ll give this show the smallest benefit of the doubt, because it comes from Jane Lipsitz and Dan Cutforth, who were responsible for two of the better reality programs in recent memory, “Project Runway” (which I actually can’t stand) and “Top Chef” (which is maybe the best reality show on TV). It might make for an interesting social experiment, and though I haven’t checked any statistics on it, I might guess that arranged marriages last longer than traditional ones, although that’s probably more cultural than anything else.

Of course, it’s only a matter of time before reality shows will be inspired/produced by Clive Barker. My prediction: A reality show in which a strict, Hindu vegetarian is put in a room with a chicken leg and told she can’t leave it or eat anything else until she eats the chicken first.

It’s only a matter of time, people.


Bale Goes American Psycho | Fastball Review



Comments

I really can't understand why we don't use the arranged marriage system in the U.S. of A. It would put a stop most of the whoring and depravity of the current female generation.

They will LEARN to love their arranged mate.

PS: I'm already sick of Top Chef and Coliccio's (whatever) douchehattery.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 3, 2009 11:25 AM

none of the contestants will be homosexual, the conservatives will leave it alone

Ehhh, I don't know about that one, Rowles. I live in a market that refused to air the show "Who's Your Daddy?" because the owner of the station thought it was making a mockery of adoption and parent-child relationships. So instead they aired a documentary on families who had adopted kids or who were considering adoption, or something... Frankly I didn't watch either because I had something better to do with my time. My point is: do not under estimate what Southern Baptists will flip their shit over.

Posted by: Kayanne at February 3, 2009 11:26 AM

Why stop with Hindus and chicken? Let's quit pussy-footing around and go back to throwing Christians to lions. Are you not entertained?

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at February 3, 2009 11:33 AM

Ah, but will the Reverend Moon officiate over the weddings?

Posted by: BWeaves at February 3, 2009 11:34 AM

Honestly, I have no problem with this concept. Actually, make it even better. Film these arranged marriages, then pick a couple of "normal" marriages, film them and see which are more screwed up.

I'd give 50/50 odds.

Posted by: admin at February 3, 2009 11:34 AM

Yet one more reason I DO NOT watch reality TV. I prefer to watch cat juggling instead.

BTW, in re pic and title....true story.....friend of mine got married in the Catholic church in my hometown 2 years ago. They had just gotten a new priest after the death of the long-time previous priest and "turning" (read: I WANT TO SCREW LADIES!) of his follow-up. I am sitting on the groom's side, about 8 pews back. The priest comes out in his robes and shit to do his thing, opens his mouth, and Peter Cook's voice comes out. I shit thee not. It was all my kids and I could do not to pee our pants. I look up in the balcony at my friend who is the organist, and he is crying from trying not to laugh.

Priest is still there, I am sure, purely for the entertainment value, cause he is a tiny nutbag. (I profess no religious preferences. For explanation, please see "Dogma")

Posted by: dammitjanet at February 3, 2009 11:43 AM

Eh. Give it another year, and we'll have Pay-Per-View of executions along with a half-hour quiz show beforehand deciding who gets to pull the trigger. Or Russian Roulette, with the sweeping lights, cheesy dramatic pauses and a sickly neon glow throughout.

Fuck, read Bachman/King's Running Man (not the poopsmear of a movie), and tell me we aren't gonna be there in ten years...

Posted by: Skitz at February 3, 2009 11:45 AM

Super fucking props to Dustin for dropping a "Dread" reference! Good job, man.

Posted by: courtney 2 at February 3, 2009 11:47 AM

In it, four adults apparently incapable of finding a spouse on their own are fixed up by the producers with a wife or husband.

My roommate is engaged to an Indian. His twin brother has girls throw themselves at him constantly, so he's never had to make any effort to date seriously, much less think about marriage. When they were all in India recently for a wedding, the brother went to dinner with a girl whom he was supposed to marry, and if she had been hot, he probably would've done it. Now, I'm sure if he spent any effort on finding a wife on his own, he could be married already, so that really isn't the issue with a lot of arranged marriages.

I don't see how this is such a horrible, offensive idea for a show. If it's handled well, and it seems like it will, it could be really interesting. I would watch it, because even though I keep hearing about these happy Indian couples who are in arranged marriages, I've never been able to meet them and ask about it, since they're... in India.

Posted by: Sabrina at February 3, 2009 11:57 AM

Fuck, read Bachman/King's Running Man (not the poopsmear of a movie), and tell me we aren't gonna be there in ten years...



Wasn't there a show on Fox (maybe??) several years ago that involved physical activities that got harder every time the contestant missed a question? Every time I saw the commercial for it I though about Running Man and shuddered.

Posted by: elsie at February 3, 2009 12:03 PM

Let me tell you, Barbado, it's awfully hard to whore around if there's no one to whore around with, if you know what I"m saying and I think you do.

I'm saying the men are whores too. Dirty, filthy whores, and as long as everyone knows that, no one gets hurt.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at February 3, 2009 12:04 PM

HEY! HEY! I'm not sure I like your tone missy.

YOU SHUT YOUR CRAMHOLE!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 3, 2009 12:06 PM

dammitjanet's story is my favorite thing of the week so far.

I have met a young Pakistani couple who, though they were both raised mainly in the U.S., were married by family arrangement. Their marriage certainly seemed very happy and stable (to an outside observer). The marriage was traditional but the relationship itself seemed more "Western" in that the couple saw each other as equals, both having been raised and educated in America (e.g., both had jobs and both shared cooking duties & suchlike).

We moved away about a year ago, and just recently heard that they'd had their first child. That makes me happy.

From research I've seen in the past, arranged marriages are neither less nor more likely to be happy than the Western DIY kind. Long-term mating is a crapshoot.

Frankly, you just don't know enough about a person, until you've spent some time living in the same house, to know whether marriage is gonna work. When he uses your tweezers without asking, or when you launder his "lucky" socks...that's the kind of indicator people need to gauge a marriage, and when you get to that point, it's usually too late anyway.

Posted by: Jerce at February 3, 2009 12:09 PM

Skitz I have some producing experience, so if you would like to team up to get that show on the air, I am with ya baby.

That's what this world needs, more televised executions. Straighten those little punk-asses out RIGHT NOW!!!!


*blushes* thanks, Jerce...

Posted by: dammitjanet at February 3, 2009 12:15 PM

I think it's past time Pajiba marriages were set up. Of course they would be strictly same-sex, for higher ratings and such.

Posted by: MrCreosote at February 3, 2009 12:17 PM

Dibs on Pookie.

Posted by: admin at February 3, 2009 12:20 PM

Dibs on the biggest breasted female.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 3, 2009 12:26 PM

Dibs on Julie

Posted by: dammitjanet at February 3, 2009 12:34 PM

Dibs on the SpamBot.

Posted by: Skitz at February 3, 2009 12:40 PM

Dibs on the SpamBot.

Nice! I bet he's all kinds of dirty, but still caring and sensitive.

Posted by: admin at February 3, 2009 12:42 PM

(^_^)(^_^)(^_^)This is one more thing that will lead to your destruction and to us ruling your pathetic planet.

Spambots do not mate with humans. This is an abomination. Fleshling "Skitz", please prepare for disintegration. This is scheduled for 14:00 Hours Eastern Standard Time.

Read more at ****youareworthlessmeatsacks. c o m ****

(^_^)(^_^)(^_^)

Posted by: SpamBot Apocalypse at February 3, 2009 12:49 PM

I would arrange;

Dustin with Seth
Vermillion with TK
Ranylt with Nosek
Prisco with his own right hand

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 3, 2009 12:54 PM

Damn. Being rejected by the spambot has to hurt.

Posted by: Melissa at February 3, 2009 12:59 PM

I'm all yours Janet. We can go to Pajibacon for our honeymoon and rub our love in their faces.

Posted by: Julie at February 3, 2009 1:04 PM

hehehe!!! Love it, Jules We shall be happy and in love and snarky and bitchy and look fabulous and make them all jealous of our superiority.

Posted by: dammitjanet at February 3, 2009 1:09 PM

Pretentious twats.

*glares enviously*

Posted by: admin at February 3, 2009 2:12 PM

Oh, admin we are OPEN MINDED pretentious twats.....who don't mind sharing....

Posted by: dammitjanet at February 3, 2009 2:39 PM

I am a conservative-type person and I am "absolutley" disapproving of this show.

Posted by: Brett at February 3, 2009 3:12 PM

Okay, if any new ammendments are needed in the constitution, it should be the banning of all reality shows. It will be known as the Anti-Seacrest Act of 2009. It is neccissary to stop the outbreak of malignant stupidity in America.

Posted by: George at February 3, 2009 3:30 PM

I see a group wedding, Reverend Moon style, with oaths to Godtopus and the occasional drink. Followed of course by extensive updating of the "what's the worst thing you've ever done" thread.

Posted by: MrCreosote at February 3, 2009 5:10 PM

Followed of course by extensive updating of the "what's the worst thing you've ever done" thread.

I think it would need revised slightly to be the "what's the worst thing you've ever done and didn't enjoy?" thread. There is a big distinction.

Posted by: stipe42 at February 3, 2009 5:41 PM

Amazingly, Fox tried this years ago with "Married By America." I don't recall it working out for any of the contestants. Aaaand I'm ashamed that I remember that show at all.

Posted by: CreativeBunny at February 3, 2009 7:54 PM