web
counter
 

"America Has a Religious Literacy Problem"

By Cindy Davis | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (60)



godinamerica271.jpg

Religious liberty and justice for all? I’m not too sure about that. I won’t get into a big dissertation on the causes of America’s discontent - I’m just here to alert you to what I think could be a worthwhile miniseries. Coming from a home where being religious meant one thing to my parents (going to church on holidays and praying when things go badly), another to my grandparents (dressing up and going to church every Sunday, participating in church events and programs and talking about God in everyday life) and yet another to me (participating in a youth group that involved smoking weed in the woods, having blasphemous conversations for fun and a camping trip that involved practically being accosted by the school vice principal’s son). You can see why I found it all confusing and went looking for answers. Of course with everything that’s out there in Theologicaland, I didn’t really find answers so much as opinions and I saw more than a few strange things (people speaking in tongues and “healing” a friend, another friend paying to sit in a special spot at church to have her foot washed by the priest). Later, I married a Jew and while it gave me more food for thought, I found that the mister’s family was more about tradition than religion. In the end, we decided that instead of attending religious services on either side of the indecisive fence, we’d spend time learning about world religion with our kids. So far that’s only meant reading together, but in the short time we’ve been doing it, it’s provided interesting information to us all. And though I don’t see it swaying me in a particular direction, learning why and what other people believe at least helps me understand my fellow man a little better.

To that end, every once in a while I like to watch those History Channel programs on this religion or that, so I’ll likely record “God in America” which airs on PBS Monday through Wednesday at 9 pm. Starring Michael Emerson, Keith David, Chris Sarandon and Toby Jones, the series explores the early history of America through a religious eye. Executive producer Michael Sullivan (“Frontline”) says, “America has a religious literacy problem. Americans are very religious, but also tend to be ignorant about religions other than their own, as well as about their country’s religious history.”

I don’t consider myself religious or ignorant, but heck, I guess I’ll take one for the team.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



So What? You Like "SNL"? That Doesn't Mean You're Gay. It Just Means You're Awful | Last Night on "SNL" | Pajiba After Dark 10/10/10









Comments

As long as folks believe that some Sky Wizard has chosen "them" over the other group of idiots who believe in another Wizard we will always have problems.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 10, 2010 3:27 PM

Or that the sky wizard needs his followers to defend his/her good name from the non-followers...

Posted by: Simon at October 10, 2010 3:42 PM

I like the euphemism, Bslim. Growing up catholic, it did not sit well with me that I was already a sinner since my "original" parents messed up. The doctrine is taken too literally. Blind faith is plain stupid, if you ask me.

Posted by: Tallulahc at October 10, 2010 4:06 PM

I wish atheism was catching, like vampirism.

Posted by: sheshakes at October 10, 2010 4:24 PM

I hate religion in principle. When people ask me what religion I am, I usually respond with this: "I'm not religious, I'm a spiritual person."

not to get theological here, but...

Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Jesus specifically says to go out and worship as you would normally. to gather together with two or more and worship. Unfortunately the people in charge after he got crucified and died and ressurected and then had the whole raining down of the holy spirit. They wanted to make Christianity an offical religion, so that other groups would give them respect. It's almost like Ancient (biblical) Israel wanting an earthly King, instead of just God and the priests chosen to represent him. ::Sigh::

That being said. I have a hunch that if we were to do away with the whole idea of religion and the churches, I believe our issues would be fixed. and we wouldn't have the extremes of just about anything that we currently do.

Posted by: LordNinja at October 10, 2010 5:07 PM

I'm not religious, I'm a spiritual person

Just shoot me. That's even worse. Not to mention unoriginal.

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at October 10, 2010 5:11 PM

Why J.K. Barlow? What's wrong with having a sense of something greater than yourself (it could be nature or the immensity of the universe and not a god)but choosing not to follow any particular dogma?

I didn't realise that being original and different at the expense of asking yourself serious questions about your beliefs was the ultimate goal of adulthood, unless you're some tragic emo who sits around cutting yourself because no one will ever understand your unique and beautiful soul.

Posted by: Ali at October 10, 2010 5:46 PM

Eh...me, I just go with "agnostic". I don't pretend to know everything, and people who do claim to know the answers (religious and atheistic zealots alike) annoy me. I do think if there is a higher power, s/he's not a moralistic prick who wants folks to kill other folks in their name...but that's about as much as I'd bet the farm on.

Posted by: meaux at October 10, 2010 6:01 PM

Well put, Ali.

When people ask me about my religious beliefs, I usually say, "none of your damn business." :)

Posted by: kittycat at October 10, 2010 6:18 PM

Michael Emerson in a miniseries about early America and religion? Count me in.

Posted by: stardust at October 10, 2010 6:27 PM

Let's put it this way: if there IS a god, how come Jessica Alba keeps getting movies that aren't hardcore porn?

Ah? Where's your mighty Sky Wizard now?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 10, 2010 6:49 PM

How any one person can say with confidence and faith that their religion, whether inherited or chosen, is the TRUE religion is beyond me.

The naivete is too much for me, and further, the arrogance to then say that all other religions are bogus and therefore heretical and therefore every single one of its followers condemned to hell? Sorry, too much ego spun into that for me.

And then there's the church. From an altar of sacrifice to a money and power machine. Does every church simply ignore the story of Jesus' tirade in the church when he found it taken over by money-changers? Or do they simply do with the story what they do with every story in their book? Ignore it if it doesn't fit in their lifestyle. Theologically make it apply to something else or some other religion.

Which brings me to one last point. How many religions are there? Even in Christianity? How many times has the bible been re-written and by whom? A king? Directed by a pope? Translated by who? Yours is the correct one because your parents dragged you to church every Sunday?

Every single religion out there. Every one, is a whittled and bastardized version of the one they claim to follow. Every bible, quran, talmud, all altered, edited, translated. And then you have every follower, disciple, priest or nun taking that altered unreality and altering it further. Taking the parts they like or agree with and throwing out the parts they don't like or don't seem to fit in their lifestyle.

Seriously, one part of the bible says to stone a person to death for this crime or that sin and another says to love your fellow man as if he were your son or father. Turn the other cheek but take that damn eye! God is love, but here, you MUST tell the fat man in the dress your deepest darkest secrets or God won't hear it or absolve you for it.

And all this would be fine. I could live in your stupid little fantasy world(s) except for one thing: None of them seem to be able to say the same about me or each other. I'm sure there are some religions or churches whose practice is to stay out of politics, out of private lives, out of schools, if only for respect for the fact that not everyone is Roman Catholic Apostolic, or Seventh Day Adventist, or Orthodox Hebrew.

That's the final arrogance and the one that turns me off off off to religion and sadly to say (much to my own personal regret, sadness, anger at myself) makes me like a person less, trust them less, believe in their mental health less and certainly never ever want them dictating policy, law or custom.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 10, 2010 7:13 PM

I would tell people that I don't believe in anything, but since I live in a small town in Texas, I just tell people what they want to hear.

Getting into a "debate" where no matter what I say, I'm wrong, just doesn't seem worth the effort anymore. All anyone does is scream at you.

Posted by: Candee at October 10, 2010 8:08 PM

I really like Buddhism. I remember taking an eastern religious philosophy class; my prof showed a video of some Buddhist Monks who address everyone who ventures there(to the himilayas): "From what great tradition do you come?" Beautiful religion, and very open-minded (unlike most of the others).

However, whenever I try to meditate I fall asleep. I could become a vegetarian, personally, but I think my meat and potatoes husband would die of a heart attack. And I certainly will not give up alcohol. Religion fail!

I'm a happy agnostic, and hoping that my son doesn't drink any kool-aid (difficult discussions about sin etc.) But I'm willing to let him explore if he wants to.

/lapsed episcopalian

Posted by: banana at October 10, 2010 8:18 PM

::jaw drop::

WOAH Protoguy woah.

I really don't know what to say, except that A) you have a good point. B) There is no one religion, you're spot on about that.


There. IS. NO. ONE. (OR) RIGHT. RELIGION Folks. there is nothing wrong with believing or disbelieving.

and J.K. there is nothing wrong with your point. Yes, it's unoriginal and all that, however it's how some choose to live, as the whole idea of (as Protoguy mentioned) a corporate entity of religion.

I don't like religion, as much as I don't like cow's tongue. I don't like the church either. both the entirity that says "worship on Sunday" or the small case local church in one's neighborhood. I like the idea of being just one with God. just being one with Him.

There's an article i read somewhere, recently, about how the hippies, back in the 60's, how they were right. and that a new idea of Hippy-ism is quietly taking place. bringing back the whole idea.

(here's the link) http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/24/my-take-the-curious-case-of-the-christian-hipster/?hpt=Mid

Posted by: LordNinja at October 10, 2010 8:31 PM

RAR I don't like religion RAR gods are bullshit.

/ranted enough on this subject for one lifetime.

Posted by: Chugga at October 10, 2010 8:39 PM

In best Homer Simpson voice "ooooooohhhh this isn't going to be about religion is it?"

Posted by: supafly at October 10, 2010 9:09 PM

I don't think some of you understand what "religious literacy" means. It has nothing to do with belief and everything to do with knowledge. It's like approaching religion as myth or philosophy. Not just one religion over another, but all religions. If you don't know what people believe, and why they believe it, you can't communicate with them. You can't broker deals for peace or even trade.

Ranting and raving about how religion and faith is corrupted or unhealthy doesn't do you any good. It doesn't do anybody any good. It just creates tension and war (for proof: read a history book). Only by understanding religions can you possibly be free to deal with the world and its myriad complexities. Belief isn't necessary.

To my fellow atheists/agnostics: The world is religious, that isn't changing any time soon. Let's get off our high horses and be open-minded. Otherwise, we're just pots calling the kettles "black."

Now, that isn't to say by being religiously literate you allow bigots, racists, and other haters to use religion to keep people down. That shit's wrong always, but if you don't know your enemy, you can't beat them. I think Sun Tzu said something like that. He was a Taoist.

Posted by: RobP at October 10, 2010 9:19 PM

Also, this book is an excellent starter-kit for those interested in actually learning something: http://www.amazon.com/Religious-Literacy-American-Know---Doesnt/dp/0060859520/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1286759808&sr=1-1

Posted by: RobP at October 10, 2010 9:19 PM

Oh! And thanks, Cindy, I didn't know this mini-series even existed, but I'll be sure to watch it now. You truly are doing God's work.

Posted by: RobP at October 10, 2010 9:21 PM

Cindy, have you looked into the Unitarian church at all? I have been a Christian my whole life, but when I had children it didn't sit right with me that they should be Christian by default (especially when Christians seem to be so far removed from the heart of compassion these days.) So I started attending the Unitarian congregation, where they have different speakers every week discussing different paths of faith (Hindu, Buddhist, Pagan, Jewish, ...) All denominations there are openly accepted and respected, and it's an interesting study to see how our different traditions and cultures can all become a fabric of growth and respect. It might be a good match for your dedication to religious literacy.

Posted by: Wif at October 10, 2010 10:08 PM

my friend is a Unitarian reverend. she is the only person keeping me from wanting to set Religion on fire, especially in this political climate.

people twist and pervert religion until it is unrecognizable. then people go off killing one another in the name of god.

faith is fine. just don't be a dick about it. this jackass actually said that jesus would have wanted that tennessee guy's house to burn.

the people who are screaming about jesus the loudest tend to be dicks. the people who just go about doing their own religious thing and not shoving it in your face? those are people i can respect.

i agree with what you said in some respects, robp. i think atheists have blind faith that there is no god, just as christians have blind faith that there is. that's why i like the wishy washiness of being "agnostic." it's like "eh, maybe. show me something and i might be willing to believe, but for now, i am a parishioner at the Church of Don't Be A Dick. my christian friend who feels the need to marry within his religion. that's cool. he's not being a dick. that fool who wanted to burn qu'rans in the name of the lord? that guy was a dick.

that said, i will watch anything with michael emerson in it.

Posted by: stopthemadness aka Angry Black Lady at October 10, 2010 10:50 PM

there should be a closed quotation mark in there somewhere. just pick a place and slap it in with your mind.

Posted by: stopthemadness aka Angry Black Lady at October 10, 2010 10:51 PM

I agree with RobP in that I am of the mind that knowledge is power and the key to kindness and tolerance. I'm not looking to be a part of some religion, but rather part of humanity. There's so much anger out there these days' much of it seems to be misplaced, misquoted and misunderstood religion.

Wif, we have indeed looked into the Unitarian church and found information as you said - exploration of all sorts of religions. For right now though, we're going with the family education program.

Posted by: Cindy at October 10, 2010 11:04 PM

agreed. i will watch because i have very little knowledge about western religions aside from the cursory knowledge gained from history in high school. (martin luther nailed some stuff on a door. i know that.)

but i could talk all day about hinduism and jainism. but then again, i'm a southeast asia-ophile and would be buddhist if i "had" to be anything. buddhism is so introspective; more about finding inner peace than saving souls.

(by the way, i totally agree with robp's point about knowledge being power. i just disagree with the conflation of atheists and agnostics as not being open-minded.)

now excuse me while i swat this fly. sorry, jains.

Posted by: stopthemadness aka Angry Black Lady at October 10, 2010 11:17 PM

also, the anger in my previous comment stems from my continuing sadness/anger at islamophobia. one of my best friends is muslim (non practicing) and he is one of the best kind-hearted people on earth. a lot of the people screaming about islamofascism, whether if they believe it or if they are using it for political purposes, aren't worthy of taking a crap in my friend's toilet.

Posted by: stopthemadness aka Angry Black Lady at October 10, 2010 11:19 PM

pardon the grammar. yikes!

Posted by: stopthemadness aka Angry Black Lady at October 10, 2010 11:20 PM

Let's put it this way: if there IS a god, how come Jessica Alba keeps getting movies that aren't hardcore porn?
Ah? Where's your mighty Sky Wizard now?
Posted by: BarbadoSlim

Where indeed...

Posted by: Brenton at October 10, 2010 11:40 PM

Ooooh. I wasn't trying to conflate all atheists (and definitely not all agnostics) with closed-mindedness. I'd be as silly and misguided as those aforementioned not-open-minded types (religious or not) if I did that. I just think we all need to be aware that whatever side of the fence we're on, we're still sharing the same ground, the same air, all that stuff.

And just so we're clear, I get all my good ideas from Kurt Vonnegut. Poot-tee-weet.

Posted by: RobP at October 10, 2010 11:40 PM

I've faced the question of what religion or faith I follow and in the past few years have honestly been able to answer that I don't know what the hell I am. The closest definition of what I believe in would be a loosely defined version of deism (much like my favorite founding fathers, Thomas J and Benjamin F.). I do believe, however, that religious literacy is essential knowledge that all persons regardless of what faith you are or are not and will definitely be watching this next week.

Posted by: RJ at October 10, 2010 11:48 PM

About the religious being @#%% ignorant about the religion--I've got a story for you. I had a co-worker (now retired and moved away), who was a big church goer. She was very involved in church activities, went to weekly Bible study, etc. And she parroted the standard line about how being gay is sinful, 'cause the Bible says so. I (confirmed atheist) asked her about slavery and genocide, which gets A-OK from the same god. Her answer was that the Bible does _not_ contain anything about slavery (and who goes to Bible class every week? Certainly not me, so I need to shut up).

Posted by: True_Blue at October 11, 2010 12:16 AM

One of my favorite comedians, Patton Oswalt, has a bit that summarizes more or less how I feel about religion. As an agnostic/lapsed Lutheran, I find it pretty damn hilarious.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55h1FO8V_3w

Posted by: Nexus_6 at October 11, 2010 12:53 AM

I believe I have been schooled.

Posted by: LordNinja at October 11, 2010 1:02 AM

Yeah, sorry. Sore subject. Too many years of Catholic school and people telling me they're open-minded while claiming with all certainty that this is a Christian nation (There's the literacy relevance). That "In God We Trust" on our money somehow proves it (again, herpaderp). That the founding fathers were all Christians -_-.
Like most things of this nature there is no amount of discussion, evidence, scholarly tomes by intellectual giants, etc., that will convince them of the blinding truth of even these small things. Forget about the big things like evolution and morality. They believe what they believe. That blind faith seems to extend well beyond simple faith in God, to faith in men of the cloth, to politicians who profess that faith to belief that presidential candidates are better based on their faith. To lack of faith in science, in government, in members of other religions.
I believe it's the basis for a lot of this so-called intellectual incuriousity. The belief that being intellectual is a negative, that there's such a thing as too much knowledge. Palinism. The idea that somehow simple home-spun knowledge will always trump science and intellectual mumbo-jumbo. Like a diabetic working for PETA.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 11, 2010 1:45 AM

When I used to teach school, the number of (Protestant) students who insisted that Catholics weren't Christians would have been funny if it hadn't been so sad. They didn't even know or understand that they themselves were Protestants. I would then attempt to explain the difference between Protestants and Catholics, and the wide range of faiths under the Protestant umbrella, not out of anything dogmatic or personal, but just because I thought that if one claimed to be of a particular faith, one should at least know what that faith is. One girl insisted to the bitter end that she was not a Protestant, she was Lutheran. Le sigh. MAJOR religious literacy problem when you don't even know what it is that you profess to be.

Posted by: Jana Jerusalem at October 11, 2010 2:41 AM

Oh, I'm all about being a thoughtful person. Questioning the nature of the universe, being open to different viewpoints. But in my experience, people who call themselves "spiritual" are the ones who treat religion like a smorgasbord -- crucifix in the bathroom? Buddha on the table? Observe the pagan solstice? Why not? -- which itself is indicative of a certain ethos, to which they will not own up. In other words, they're just as dogmatic as Catholics in their take-what-you-want schtick, but get to pretend they're open-minded.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm out of razor blades.

Posted by: J. K. Barlow at October 11, 2010 4:28 AM

"As long as folks believe that some Sky Wizard has chosen "them" over the other group of idiots who believe in another Wizard we will always have problems."

And as long as we replace those folks with dribbly people so unembarrassed by their ignorance that they write sentences like that - a sentence equivalent to "If quantum physicists keep believing that magic particles decide to exist into two places at once when they know a person is not looking at them..." in levels of stupidity, deliberate misrepresenation and childish faux-naive faux-idiocy, then we will definitely always have problems.

Posted by: Ender at October 11, 2010 5:07 AM

@Jana Jerusalem:

It's amazing, isn't it? One guy I knew in uni told me, completely straight faced with no hint of irony that he'd been "in charge of converting Catholics to Christianity" in his old church.

But then again this was the (not especially attractive, to be kind) guy who boasted to me that he'd 'converted' a lesbian without worrying about:
a) the likeliness of this having happened.
b) what the benefit of this was.

Posted by: Ender at October 11, 2010 5:16 AM

Sorry, that's meant to be 'a) the likeliness of this ever having happened.' Like if there was a lesbian who was like, "Wow, damn! That cock actually is so good, that I am not only bisexual now, I have no interest in women any more. It's a magicock!"

Posted by: Ender at October 11, 2010 5:22 AM

okay. god is not real folks. as human beings, were all born fundamentally insane. weve created travesties like religion, economics, politics, and katherine heigl(FUCK YOU) to cope with our insanity

Posted by: Taylor Kozakar at October 11, 2010 8:00 AM

It's not the ignorance that gets me, it's the willing ignorance. The belief that all you need is belief. The disdain for knowledge beyond the spiritual.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 11, 2010 8:51 AM

15) No hard drink of any type is allowed in this diet.

Posted by: Brian Vanelderen at October 11, 2010 8:52 AM

It's almost like Ancient (biblical) Israel wanting an earthly King
---
Actually, I think they did. IIRC his followers at the time were convinced he was going to become a warrior-king and throw the Roman jackboot off their necks. Some were sorely disappointed with his "meek shall inherit the earth" and "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" stuff.

Anyway, y'all can believe whatever you want to believe (or don't). What bothers me in these types of discussions is that the good work that millions of Christians (and people of other faiths and, sure, no faiths) do all the time, without the attention the noise makers get, is ignored. Many of the people y'all are so quick to dismiss as nutcases are working food pantries and soup kitchens and clothing collections and visiting and comforting the sick and elderly and dying etc. etc. They take their call seriously. But ya'll are happy to lump them in with the whack jobs.

Posted by: , at October 11, 2010 10:39 AM

Did you not know that when religious people do good things in the name of their religion it is absolutely definitely not because of their religion? After all non-religious people do good things all the time.
However, all the bad things religious people have done in the name of their religion are because of their religion. Take the Crusades. Bad Religion. I bet those priests laypeople professional soldiers doing the killing and the looting were only ever in it out of piety.*

p.s. this reverses itself when it comes to Atheists, natch. Those killing priests as 'cockroaches'... ...only in it for the communism. Nothing to do with them being atheists. This is fair, because apart from the times that they do, they generally don't say they are doing it 'in the name of Atheism'.
This does not mean that you can only say that Atheism has caused you to be good/better than Religiots only in instances where you said 'in the name of Atheism'. That would be an absurd single standard.

*Disclaimer: this represents the general state of some of the public discourse, the above opinions are not attributed to any persons living or dead. Except Bill Maher. And Richard Dawkins.

Posted by: Ender at October 11, 2010 11:03 AM

Many are working soup kitchens. Many are actively canvassing to deny basic human rights to groups they dislike, like gays. Or Muslims. Many are actively spreading virulent lies about government, other religions, gay rights, abortion, etc.. Many are basing their decisions about not what they can and can't do, based on their religion, but what you and I can't as well. Many are forming grass roots 'uprisings' to essentially try to force their way of thinking on the rest of us.

I will not ignore or gloss over hatred simply because it's not a majority.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 11, 2010 11:41 AM

And no-one is asking you to. All , said in his/her original comment was that it's a pity that in these discussions no one pays any attention to the moral things done by the faithful, just the loud annoying blowhards.

Why do you think you've been asked to ignore or gloss over anything?

Posted by: Ender at October 11, 2010 12:08 PM

I will not ignore or gloss over hatred simply because it's not a majority.

At least recognize the good works, then? Maybe acknowledge them? Maybe don't be so quick to dismiss religion because of a few nut cases? Your argument is akin to saying you hate all movies because Scary Movie 12 is coming out.

Please, do not for one second try to lump me in with people like Fred Phelps or Pat Robertson. And please, do not dismiss religion because the aforementioned are its loudest, most annoying "spokespeople".

Dismissing religion because people have, in your own words, perverted and distorted it to be hateful and bigoted is a fallacy. You obviously hate the perversion and distortion of a religion you recognize to actually be one of love and fellowship and caring for humanity.

It saddens me to no end that when I explain that I am religious (in fact, in the process of applying to seminary), that I must then go on to explain that I also stand up for gay rights, acknowledge the presence and validity of other religions, believe that atheists who do good work are just as awesome as Christians who do good work... etc etc etc.

Furthermore, to claim that if we only got rid of religion, we would get rid of all our problems not only ignores the vast amount of good things religion does, but also ignores the fact that fanaticism is not simply a religious problem. It also ignores all of our problems that are caused by resource shortage, power grabs, greed and corruption.

Do not, as people like Bill Maher and Richard Dawkins do, find the lowest common denominator and use it as generalized proof that we're all wrong/stupid/moronic/archaic/backwards/bigots/etc.Thats just bad science... practiced by people claiming the superiority of science over religion.

Next time one of you see Fred Phelps being a knuckle dragging troglodyte, please don't instantly say "all religious people are stupid, bigoted and hateful and therefore religion is a crock of shit". Because if you do, I'm gonna start going to ICP concerts and using Juggalos as my proof that all music lovers are window licking mongoloids.

Posted by: Lennon at October 11, 2010 12:31 PM

Most Americans are as ignorant about religion (including their own claimed religious affiliation) as they are about every other kind of history.

I wouldn't mind, except many of them act as if they know what they're talking about and when you suggest that they don't know it all, they get all assholish about it. It's like talking about politics. Most people get their political info from a very narrow group of sources that tend to reinforce (rather than challenge) what they already believe, so when confronted with different viewpoints, they are often extremely hostile to them. Most people's understanding of religion (in the U.S., anyway) is arrived at the same way.

Most of the time, I don't initiate discussions of religion for the very reasons you might suspect. I'm atheist; I don't particularly enjoy debating religion, but if someone forces me to (until it gets old and I leave or attempt to change the subject), I don't see any reason to hold back. The problem with a lot of religious people is they reserve the right to speak candidly about other people's beliefs (or lack of) but as soon as someone speaks frankly about THEIR beliefs and the shortcomings or contradictions, they get all mad. They expect you to sit there politely while they pontificate on their opinions of other beliefs/traditions, in often insulting and patronizing language, but the moment you give them the same treatment, they refuse to reciprocate. It's why polite discussion of religion is usually impossible. People love to dish it out, but they can't take it.

Posted by: Slash at October 11, 2010 12:32 PM

Bad Religion
---
But I LIKE Bad Religion. "Recipe for Hate" is fucking awesome.

Also, this?

"Did you not know that when religious people do good things in the name of their religion it is absolutely definitely not because of their religion?"

Is absolute nonsense. It completely ignores belief in something bigger than the self as a possible motivation to help others.

Posted by: , at October 11, 2010 1:05 PM

I realize you don't have to believe that Jesus was a semi-diety who rose from the dead and all that -- you don't have to believe in Buddha or Muhammad or Vishnu or any diety -- to follow the example they set. But if all acts of humanity and charity and selflessness you perform spring from your intrinisic goodness, then why doesn't the goodness in you allow for the possibility that other people who perform smiliar acts who just happen to be religious do so for similarly selfless motives? Why you gotta hate on them if you're so good all by yourself?

Not saying you can't call bullshit on bullshit. Just wondering why you have to paint EVERY believer as a moron and an asshole. The self-superiority of atheists is as off-putting as smug religious types who are convinced everyone but them is going to hell.

Posted by: , at October 11, 2010 1:13 PM

*--Sorry, SOME atheists (pot, meet kettle).

Posted by: , at October 11, 2010 1:19 PM

Yes, thanks for the notice, Cindy. I will be DVRing this and checking it out.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at October 11, 2010 1:42 PM

We're all just talking in circles now, people. Cindy, ABL, and myself settled all this last night. Now it's time to establish world peace and obliterate famine. C'mon, whattaya say?

Posted by: RobP at October 11, 2010 2:00 PM

I have to wish you good luck on your quest to explore faith with your children. May I make a suggestion, regarding your search? I tend to agree with your decision not to attend services on all sides while you're looking, but you may want to actually take some time and speak to priests of various belief systems. I got lucky in High School, we had a really fantastic world religions course that led us from Cathedrals to a Hindu Temple to a mosque, a buddhist monastery and a half dozen others. Even if you don't come to any conclusions, it's worthwhile just to see the art and beauty that come from different viewpoints.

I was raised Anglican, by parents who really do believe and genuinely try to live the spirit of Christianity instead of just the trappings. They're not perfect, but at least they try.

Well, being a cynic from the age of about five, I managed Church until high school when I more or less lost the faith. After exploring a fairly wide variety of other belief systems I came the long way back to Christianity, deciding to actually do a degree in Theology and Philosophy to see if there were any answers to my questions.

For anyone else who has done the same, you already know the end result: there aren't. Four thousand or so years of organized study, debate and contemplation and no one has indubitable answers. As a side note, my school doubles as a multi-denominational seminary. I can't imagine how they actually manage to turn out priests and ministers year after year with all those books in the library.

So I think of myself as a recovering Christian. I managed to educate myself right out of what little faith I had. Now I study religion from a different perspective, trying to find the cracks and the reasons that it fails. I'd like to found my own someday, based around logic, reason and the basic concept that we all exist to learn, improve ourselves and evolve our way back towards the Godhead.

Either that or I'll just go back to my roots and start worshipping Woden again. Say what you will about the Norse, their versions of the afterlife trump most of the others I've ever come across.

BUT, in spite of my impatience (and dislike) of organized religion, I am still in awe of people who are intelligent, rational and still manage to hold on to their faith. I recognize that I am simply not that strong.

I will say one thing regarding religious intolerance: there are as many paths to God (or the Divine, or Enlightenment, etc) as there are people to walk them. Anyone who says different is either lying or misinformed.

The trouble, ALL the trouble, with religion is the same as with politics, the same as with war, the same as with everything else: People. We just kind of suck. We're primitive, xenophobic, irrational and credulous.

That, and one little piece of wisdom: there are only two sins - Selfishness and Ignorance. Everything can be boiled down to one, the other or both together. But they don't become mortal sins until you add the word Willful to the front.

Sorry. Don't usually get so deep on a long weekend. This post kind of pushed some buttons. Can we go back to speculating on Dwayne Johnson's career now?

Posted by: Wintermute at October 11, 2010 3:34 PM

Lennon, I hate being lumped with those losers, too. I rejected my conservative fundamentalist upbringing and I'm Episcopalian now--their open-minded tolerance, rationality, and passion for social justice is much more my speed.

Posted by: pickled tink at October 12, 2010 10:53 AM

And as long as we replace those folks with dribbly people so unembarrassed by their ignorance that they write sentences like that... blah blah blah.. in levels of stupidity, deliberate misrepresenation and childish faux-naive faux-idiocy, then we will definitely always have problems.
Posted by: Ender at October 11, 2010 5:07 AM

--------------------------------------------

I have misrepresented nothing and your ad-hominem rant just proves my point. There's just no way to talk rationally with someone who believes in magic beings from the sky.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 12, 2010 9:18 PM

Oh, so it's just a coincidence that you cut out the part of my comment that demonstrated you doing that?

"If quantum physicists keep believing that magic particles decide to exist into two places at once when they know a person is not looking at them..."* -- is to what quantum physicists actually believe as: "As long as folks believe that some Sky Wizard has chosen "them" -- is to what religious people actually believe.

It's a deliberately phrased description, purposefully using words that do not actually describe the actual things that the other believes, but instead describe something childish and intuitively stupid.

Describing God as a 'Sky Wizard' is like describing the Big Bang as the 'Big Pop' or the 'Big Fart' - it's a stupid and childish way to express your disagreement. If you've got a braincell in your head then you can make a valid criticism, otherwise it's best not to embarrass yourself with insults and invective (Sky Wizards/idiots) then whine about ad hominems.

* I don't know what you know about quantum physics, and since you are apparently so incredibly stupid** that you can't see how "Sky Wizard" misrepresents what religious people believe, allow me to explain, quantum physicists do not believe this. Thus this would be a misrepresentation of what they believe, if you were thick enough to use it as a criticism of them.

**This is not neccessarily true, it's possible that you are so self-regarding and arrogant that you once believed in a Sky Wizard, and now are too proud and embarrassed to admit that you used to believe in something so stupid alone, so to soothe your ego you have convinced yourself that every religious person must be as stupid as you once were.

Posted by: Ender at October 13, 2010 5:55 AM

“We are all functioning at a small fraction of our capacity to live fully in its total meaning of loving, caring, creating and adventuring. Consequently, the actualizing of our potential can become the most exciting adventure of our lifetime.” – Herbert Ottto

Posted by: Lise Helmly at January 6, 2011 12:06 AM

Wow the colors are amazing!

Posted by: smallville episodes at January 24, 2011 2:21 PM

you can visit phoenixmedia.org to get more download

Posted by: Carroll B. Merriman at February 13, 2011 4:17 AM