web
counter
 

AMC Cuts "The Walking Dead" Season 2 In Twain, Like A Katana Slicing Through So Many Zombies

By Rob Payne | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (16)



pajibawalkingdeadtwosplitB.jpg

After news of creative disputes, writer and director firings, budget and location concerns, and undue pressure felt by the cast and crew of the hit TV show, any news about AMC’s “The Walking Dead” adaptation is bound to be met with some hesitation and paranoia. Reporting on the show has become akin to feeling like network flesh-and-brain eaters lurk behind every link on the net.

But AMC’s announcement that the next chapter will begin on October 16 with a 90-minute premier, followed by five hour-long episodes with a two month break until the next run of six straight hours starting on February 12, 2012, is not nearly enough to kill “The Walking Dead.” The difference chopping a zombie and this show in half is that serialized TV is more like an earthworm than the undead — each segment (episode) of a show contains the series’ entire DNA, and cutting an earthworm in half merely creates two equally strong versions of the same creation. That’s assuming, of course, that we don’t get two halves that mimic the up-and-down quality of season one, but instead use the longer production schedule to properly build tension and story without feeling rushed by the end.

Besides, if season two is as good as it has every right to be, I would much rather have six or seven months between brand new seasons than nearly a whole year, like the wait between seasons one and two. Sure, having a two-month split merely gives AMC an excuse to pad out advertising dollars by having the season air during the height of Sweeps, but sometimes, sometimes art and commerce aren’t enemies. Of course, that’s only if any of that ad revenue is funneled back into the show, instead of merely being another example of AMC’s Mad Men Money Laundering scheme.

As long as the extra lead time helps new showrunner Glen Mazzara and comic book scribe Robert Kirkman to eventually bring a cable television version of The Governor to miserable life, we’re all in for one narrative wild ride that any behind-the-scenes shenanigans would have a hard time ruining.

Rob Payne also writes the indie comic The Unstoppable Force, co-hosts the internet radio show We’re Not Fanboys, and tries to avoid the zombie horde on the Twitter @RobOfWar.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 9/5/11 | The Ten Biggest Box Office Hits and 5 Biggest Bombs of the Summer









Comments

I really just want them to change the title.

If they changed the title I could look at this from an entirely different perspective and be happy with it.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 5, 2011 7:56 PM

Deist you get the nominee for stupidest comment of the year. And trust me I've made a couple myself. We should call batman "bruce wayne" and spider man "teen angst."

I'm OK with this news. I'd be even more OK with it if Darabont came back, but you take the good with the bad. I feel like a separated season will give Darabont a chance to do SOMETHING original.

Posted by: aroorda at September 5, 2011 8:13 PM

The only thing I got out of this post is AMC wants to split up the season so they can charge people for two season 2 dvd sets.

Posted by: John W at September 5, 2011 9:20 PM

It doesn't matter. If they don't get it right,I'll just walk away. I don't have time to wait around for people who get paid too much money to entertain me, to not entertain me.

(Translation: 'fuck em')

Posted by: Candy at September 5, 2011 10:20 PM

This sounds okay to me, at least we're getting more this season than the measly six eps from season one. Doctor Who got split and it doesn't seem to be detrimental to the viewing experience.

Posted by: snapnhiss at September 5, 2011 10:32 PM

No matter what anyone says, I CANNOT wait for the next installment of this show.

Posted by: Readrick at September 5, 2011 10:34 PM

I'm totally down with this. Splitting it into two mini-seasons makes perfect sense to me. Comics are split up in five to six issue story arcs, so it is completely logical to split up a television show that is based on a comic into five or six episodes that focus on a certain story arc. I think mini-seasons like this have the potential of being awesome, but honestly, as long as I'm getting my Walking Dead, I don't really care how they split up the seasons.

Posted by: morganattacks at September 6, 2011 12:34 AM

Anyone think they split it as not to compete with Sunday Night Football?

Posted by: No One at September 6, 2011 12:49 AM

aroorda, I think what DeistBrawler meant was that if it was just a zombie show, it would be okay, but being an adaptation of a superior product is harder to swallow.
So you get the nomination for farthest conclusion jumping.

The thing that scares me the most about the love/hate relationship AMC seems to have with this show is what it could mean for Chew. From what I've heard, Layman and Guillory went through the same people to the same people for their deal.

Posted by: Jordan at September 6, 2011 1:03 AM

I thought they fired Darabont?

Posted by: Oroboros at September 6, 2011 1:42 AM

Not great news but hardly the end of the world. I just hope the writing is good and the budget cuts don't make a big difference in the look of the show.

Posted by: Morosey at September 6, 2011 8:03 AM

Ian McShane as the governator would make me so so so happy.

Posted by: asdff at September 6, 2011 10:37 AM

Thanks, Jordan.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 6, 2011 2:52 PM

Oh good, because this worked out GREAT for Battlestar Galactica.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 6, 2011 7:16 PM

Say what you want, I'm gonna go ahead and prophecize the future here. This show is going to rot into a massive pile of filth faster than that old lady zombie from the first episode. AMC doesn't know how to handle having a winner. They lost Darabont, and the writers, and the budget, and anything that remotely resembled the original material...it's gonna fail fast.

Posted by: Blank at September 8, 2011 6:12 PM

Great site; I actually admire how it is fair on my eyes and very well written. Is there any way I could be flagged down whenever a new post has been uploaded? I've saved RSS feed, thinking that will do the job! Have a good one.

Posted by: Aracely Rasey at October 20, 2011 3:50 AM