web
counter
 

A Ginger Set to Play Janis (F**king) Joplin

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (38)



amy-adams1.jpg

I like Amy Adams. A lot. She’s a brilliant actress who deserved her two Oscar nominations, although she does have a knack for picking the occasionally heinous project despite the lack of need to do so (Leap Year, NIght at the Museum 2). She can sing, too, as Enchanted demonstrated. But what it didn’t demonstrate was that she could sing like Janis fucking Joplin. Or at all possess the edginess of Janis fucking Joplin. Unless Janis Joplin had a princess phase I don’t know about. No one in the history of the world has ever said Amy fucking Adams. But when you think of Joplin, you think either: Janis. Or Janis fucking Joplin.

All of which makes the fact that Adams is attached to Get It While You Can, a Janis Joplin biopic, such a head scratcher. There’s some slight physical resemblance, but I don’t know if all the Oscar nominated talent in the world make Adams ideal for that role.

Nevertheless, she is attached, as is Fernando Meirelles (“City of God”), which is something of an odd choice for director, too. Meirelles is co-writing with Jose Eduardo Belmonte, and best I can tell, there’s nothing that ties Meirelles’ work thematically together with Janis Joplin.

Moreover, the decision — in light of so many failed biopics of ’60s and ’70s musicians — to even make this movie is a head scratcher. Joplin’s fanbase is, like, 50 or 60 now, and that particular demographic doesn’t attend a lot of movies. Maybe it’s an Oscar-baiting flick, which explains Adams’ and Meirelles’ presence. But, commercially, I don’t see a lot of viability in the project, even with Twilight producer, Wyck Godfrey, developing the project. I mean: If Kristen Stewart can’t sell Joan Jett to the masses in The Runaways, I seriously doubt that Adams could do much for Janis fucking Joplin.

(Fearnet via The Wrap)










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Polanski To Film God of Carnage | Well At Least the Poor Soul Is Moving On | Mark Wahlberg In Talks For The Raven









Comments

Didn't you once write an article saying "attached" was an industry term meaning "maybe they will, but maybe they won't"?

If that's the case, neither of these two people may end up having anything to do with it.

That is absolutely true, vercodio. And here I thought no one paid the least bit of attention to that post. I appreciate that. And yes: It is very possible that the project may never happen, and that if it does, it may never happen with either of these. But for the time being, they are first-in line, so to speak. "Attached" is kind of like: Right of first refusal. -- DR

Posted by: vercordio at July 19, 2010 10:32 AM

Wrong, wrong, wrong. My mother is already calling this "fucking STUPID", pre-supposing she can figure out how to get on the internet to read this...

Posted by: D-Day at July 19, 2010 10:32 AM

Where? Where is there a "slight resemblance"? Janice was a kick-ass singer but no way in hell would anyone ever say she was a petite sweet looking girl with a snub nose. This is clearly the Nicole Kidman-fake nose/Cherlize Theron-fake face Oscar bid.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 19, 2010 10:40 AM

I would see the shit out of a Janis biopic and I'm 30. I love Janis fucking Joplin!

That said I would under no circumstances pay good money to see the Amy Adams version. What about Pink or Joss Stone? I remember that these two were always trying to get the part via mentioning it in interviews. Even that stupid idea with Renee Zellweger from a few years back sounds better than this.

Posted by: Phedre at July 19, 2010 10:43 AM

I don't know, I mean Phillip Seymour Hoffman played tiny little Truman Capote convincingly, and Adams is a very capable actress. Maybe there's potential. But I'm just a silly youth, what do I know?

Posted by: Dorothy Snarker at July 19, 2010 10:45 AM

Evidently the idea of a Joplin biopic has been passed around for years, but nobody has been able to find someone to play her. She might be unplayable -- how do you find someone who can do the voice AND the mania? If you tone either one down, that ain't Janis fucking Joplin anymore....

Posted by: sansho1 at July 19, 2010 10:51 AM

I adore Janis Joplin, and for some reason I think Amy Adams is gonna knock it out of the park.

Posted by: SofĂ­a at July 19, 2010 10:52 AM

But...but.....I don't want her to dress up like Janis Joplin! That would hurt me!

Posted by: Jay at July 19, 2010 10:57 AM

She's got the talent. While there is pretty much no resemblance between the two I don't think that means much in this day and age. Hopefully this works because of the skill of the actress and not the fact that "OMG she looks just like her!"

In addition, Amy Joplin would be pretty hot.

Posted by: admin at July 19, 2010 10:59 AM

Three little words: Jackie. Jormp. Jomp.

My dad says that his strongest memory of his meeting Janis Joplin was her very strong smell.

I like Amy Adams a great deal, and one never knows how a performance will shake down, but right now, I retain first right of refusal to see this eventual assumptive movie.

Posted by: Nora Rocket at July 19, 2010 11:07 AM

Who will play Leonard Cohen in the famous head episode in the Chelsea Hotel?

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 19, 2010 11:20 AM

Whatever happened to Zooey Deschanel playing her?

How about Emma Stone playing her?

Posted by: John W at July 19, 2010 11:37 AM

Janis Joplin = basic, semi-unattractive, with a voice that could kill

Amy Adams = too effing hot to play Janis.

They'd be better off casting an unknown in the roll who looks like and can sing like Janis. Trust me...they're out there. Just send some casting guys to Joshua Tree for a few days. Tell them to bring plenty of pot and granola.

Posted by: PissBoy at July 19, 2010 11:40 AM

If Beyonce can play Etta James, I can buy Amy Adams as Janis Joplin. Plus, Janis was bisexual. Hot girl-on-girl action with Amy Adams. Yowza!

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at July 19, 2010 11:41 AM

role*
FCUK I can't spell today!

Posted by: PissBoy at July 19, 2010 11:42 AM

Tracer has made a convincing arguement. The studio needs to fast track this. Especially the 'Yowza!' part.

Posted by: PissBoy at July 19, 2010 11:43 AM

Comparing Kristen Stewart to Amy Adams is like comparing coarse sand paper smeared with kitty litter to quilted nothern as two similar TP options. I am not saying Amy Adams is the perfect actress to play Janis but saying if Kristen can't do it neither can Amy is just an obviously dumb statement. Amy Adams has acted with Meryl (and held her own) on more than one occasion. Besides Julie and Julia she was phenomenal in Doubt, (also acted alongside Philip Seymour Hoffman with grace). I know she has made one or two recent poor career decisions but you can't blame her, she can't follow Meryl forever. Kristen's best offering is the Twilight Shitastic Saga in which no one likes her portrayal of Bella, so had to call you on this one Dustin.

Posted by: TVConnoisseur at July 19, 2010 11:51 AM

I'm thinking Ms. Adams just might surprise us all.

Posted by: ceejeemcebeegee at July 19, 2010 12:00 PM

I hope they can't get the music rights.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at July 19, 2010 12:02 PM

I am hoping that this is a "two great tastes that taste great together" situation.

I can conceive of a bad Janis biopic. I have heard that there are bad Amy Adams movies. But simultaneous bad Amy Adams with bad Janis? I am hardly a theist at this point in my life, but I have to assume that if there is a God, he or she wouldn't do that to me.

Should I make with the praying?

Posted by: ZombieScientist at July 19, 2010 12:05 PM

You bitches said the same shit about Mr. Phoenix playing Mr. Cash.
She is a tremendously talented actor who is more than capable of play a drug addicted singer/songwriter from the 60's. (REMEMBER: as an actor, it is her job to portray other people, even those who don't look and sound exactly like her. I know, I know....shocking)

Posted by: C. C. Devine at July 19, 2010 12:41 PM

I know they did this for laughs, but Jane Krakowski made quite the Joplin on 30 Rock, as Nora Rocket has already pointed out. I just don't see Amy Adams pulling it off.

Posted by: bonnie at July 19, 2010 12:51 PM

If Kristen Stewart couldn't pull off Joan Jett???? That is your rationale for whether Amy Adams, a far superior actress, could play Janis Joplin? Joan Jett is exciting and a presence. I'm not sure Kristen Stewart couldn't spell presence or excitement, but I'm sure she could mumble them deadeyed if they were in a script. She was good in Adventureland, but I think playing an emotionless pot smoker was a little bit on the nose for her minuscule acting range.

However, while I love Amy Adams (she is in my top 5) I also agree maybe they are better off using an unknown for the role. However, if they need someone to play Joplin's corpse, then they can call Kristen Stewart.

Posted by: Rubble44 at July 19, 2010 12:53 PM

What about Dana Fuchs? From Across the Universe? I just did a quick google and she's actually played Janis on stage before.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at July 19, 2010 1:55 PM

I don't think Dustin was saying that Kristen Stewart is a better actress than Amy Adams, unless he's been kidnapped and that's his signal to alert the authorities. He's saying that it not really financially viable since the target audience for a movie like this is not the group that's currently spending millions in disposable cash at theaters (young audiences). It's the older viewers who are more likely to wait for it come out on Netflix or DVD. And if someone like Kristen Stewart, who is wildly popular among young audiences couldn't inspire interest in a bit of rock history, then it isn't likely that Amy Adams will either, even if she is a better actress. Like it or not, it's not just about telling the story of a kick-ass musician. They're going to need to get cheeks in seats.

Posted by: jM at July 19, 2010 2:01 PM

I know I am risking my head on a platter, but I am not that thrilled with Ms. Adams as an actress. Why can't they just let dead rock stars lie? There is enough footage out there to make (another) interesting documentary.*
*Of course, if something is listed as a documentary, it may never get seen - no matter how good.

Posted by: bonbiz at July 19, 2010 2:03 PM

I have zero interest in seeing biopics about singers. They've ALL been boring. The Glen Miller Story, snooze. That Doors' movie, snooze. They all pretty much come down to, "Sing, take drugs, drink, die."

Posted by: BWeaves at July 19, 2010 2:20 PM

I'm not sure why so many early commenters are stuck on the idea of a prissy Janice. OBVIOUSLY it would be Amy Adams as Janice Joplin and not Amy Adams in a Janice Joplin costume for 2 hours. I'm skeptical about whether or not she can pull it off too, but I sense somebody trying to shake up their image and wipe the stink off that's been lingering since Leap Year. With any luck Amy's just as big a Joplin fan as the rest of us and will throw herself into.
I still like this a hell of alot more than decidedly 1 note kewpie doll, "ain't I cool" Zooey Deschanel taking a crack at it.

Posted by: valerie at July 19, 2010 2:27 PM

BETH HART BETH HART BETH HART BETH HART BETH HART!!!!!

Posted by: Kevin at July 19, 2010 2:34 PM

"But when you think of Joplin, you think either: Janis. Or Janis fucking Joplin."

Sure sure, I am with you. Sometime I say "The Rose". Or sometimes "I say love, it is a river that drowns the tender reed."

But I wouldn't say "Bette Midler", Celine Dion or Amy Adams if I was standing next to Granny with a bucket of Nickels at Caesars.

Posted by: Juice in LA at July 19, 2010 2:34 PM

"But when you think of Joplin, you think either: Janis. Or Janis fucking Joplin."

Sure sure, I am with you. Sometime I say "The Rose". Or sometimes "I say love, it is a river that drowns the tender reed."

But I wouldn't say "Bette Midler", Celine Dion or Amy Adams if I was standing next to Granny with a bucket of Nickels at Caesars.

Posted by: Juice in LA at July 19, 2010 2:35 PM

BWeaves:

Are you including "Sid and Nancy" in that? Yeah, I agree it was a variation on "sing, take drugs, drink and die," to wit: "snarl somewhat melodically, take drugs, drink, kill your girlfriend and die," but it was a hell of an entertaining movie.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 19, 2010 3:41 PM

It should have been Brittany Murphy. I saw a screen test she did as Janis once and it was fucking amazing. Wish she were still here.

Posted by: CL at July 19, 2010 4:57 PM

Joplin was a pussy. I saw footage of her on the verge of tears as she talked about being ostracized in high school. You dont get more pathetic than crying over what bullies said or did to you years after the fact. I say again..Joplin was a pussy! End of Line

Posted by: Jack Random at July 19, 2010 7:58 PM

I doubt that a movie about a junkie that screams to music would draw my interest.
And, that girl has no business playing Joplin, she's gorgeous. If my dog was as ugly as JJ was I'd shave his ass and teach him to walk backwards.

Posted by: mechadave at July 19, 2010 8:39 PM

She should be played by Crispin Glover!

I'm sorry. But girl was NOT pretty.

Posted by: figgy at July 20, 2010 12:54 AM

Well I'm a little intrigued to be honest...and as for the too pretty argument, whatever. Looks are the damn easiest thing on earth to manipulate, and people are only as pretty as you want them to be in your own mind's eye.

I bet Amy could do it. Charlize...well sure she gained a bit of weight and added some stuff to distract from her regular looks, but her characterization of her Monster persona was extremely well acted - her mannerisms like the tongue running under her lip and her greasy hair flips and small anger lunges and her winces before freaking out - well those things sold the tale. Amy can act...it all comes down to craft in these things. You'll buy the smooth feel before the rough finish.

And you know what? Some folks make art through pain, and some folks slide along life on a smile. Don't be so fucking judgy.

Posted by: replica at July 20, 2010 1:18 AM

I know I'm going to ostracize the Pajibans here, but am I alone in thinking Amy Adams is not that mind-blowingly gorgeous? I think she is a good actress (though I really can only picture here with her eyes widened and Streep essentially blew her off the damn screen in J & J), but have always found her to be pretty at best, plain-Jane--wholesome cute at worst. I actually don't think that's Dustin's analysis here, but I'm responding more to commenters.

If the dude from "City of God" is involved, I have to have faith that this will be good. Also, there's just not enough movies about women out there [who aren't totally fucking moronic], so bravo.

Posted by: samantha t at July 20, 2010 8:25 AM