web
counter
 

3 Bizarre Examples of Digitally Inserting Movie Ads into "How I Met Your Mother" Reruns. The Computers are Making NPH Lie

By Dustin Rowles and Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Trade News | Comments (22)



zookeeperbackintime-568x350.jpg

You know those terrible commercials in which famous scenes or characters are raped with CGI in order to push vacuum cleaners or toothpaste? They’ve taken the next step. Reruns of “How I Met Your Mother” are being altered with computer diddle whacks to include advertisements in the back ground. Oh, and we’re not talking just any advertising, we’re not talking about updating soda cans with new logos, we’re talking about the most heinous form of advertising imaginable.

I could write an extensive rant at this point, but we all know what the rant would say. Compromise of artistic principles, works of art should stand as they are, wow I always figured that if someone found a way to rape their previous work and sell out at the same time it would be George Lucas. Tack on a reference to 1984, we’re watching Zookeeper this summer, we’ve always been watching Zookeeper. Then cap it off with a few jabs at fucking Zookeeper on general principle.

Got that all out of the way, but really, the thing that actually irritates me and gets my blood cooking is the waste of effort to bother doing this. Is a fuzzy half-recognizable picture in a five year old rerun people have on in the background while they cook dinner really going to sell a single additional ticket to Zookeeper? There’s not like there’s a lot of crossover between the typical viewer of Paul Blart: Farting, Talking Animal Movie and the average “HIMYM” fan, but even if there were, how much traction can you imagine they got out of a small barely visible ad? Do the math: If it costs $3,000 to digitally insert that ad, they’d need to attract at least 300 ticket buyers to recoup the expense. You’d probably see a better return on the investment with shuttle services to Zookeeper screenings from mental hospitals.

The above ad was tracked down by Consumerist, and they even provide a before image to see how much photoshopping effort actually went into this. It is not, however, the first time this has been done. It’s not even the first time it’s been done on “How I Met Your Mother,” as we were able to track down two more examples, first of the demographically appropriate variety, a Bad Teacher poster inserted into the background, and then the not so appropriate insertion of a Country Strong ad in the background.

tumblr_lmuvsbFOJz1qzigjno1_500.jpg

himynountrystorng.jpg

(Via Ropes of Silicon)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The Iron Lady Trailer: Why Does Margaret Thatcher Sound Like Julia Child? | In the Final Harry Potter Cast Photo, Emma Watson Looks Like the Pretty Girl that Showed Up to Nerd Prom









Comments

SWARLEY!!!!

Posted by: Internet Magpie at July 7, 2011 9:24 AM

...the fuck? Why are they doing this to something I love? I enjoy, like, four things. Why? WHY?

ROBIN SCHERBATSKY DOESN'T WANT TO BE AROUND ZOOKEEPER, YOU DICKBAGS.

Posted by: Courtney at July 7, 2011 9:30 AM

"Swarley" takes place in 2006. Timeline can be argued on other episiodes, but for this one, it was before Lily and Marshall got married in 2007. BAD TEACHER WASN'T OUT YET IN 2007. ASSHOLES.

I admit I am much more bothered by this than I should be.

Posted by: Courtney at July 7, 2011 9:33 AM

I really think this is a total fucking waste of money. Like you dudes said, there's likely not a huge crossover audience, but also, with the exception of the countdown episode (which I still have not seen and you can't make me, not without a liter bottle of Gatorade and a teddy bear with Jason Segel's face), are people REALLY paying that much attention to the background when they could be focused on Robin, Barney, Lily's boobs after season 4, Marshall's horrible hair, or how great Ted's face would look with a black eye?

Posted by: Internet Magpie at July 7, 2011 9:33 AM

How many of you remember the movie "Looker". Hands please?

Ah. A few of you. Okay, now how many of you remember anything besides naked Susan Dey?

Not as many. Well that's to be expected. Back in the day, the idea of nude Laurie Partridge was pretty hot. But even in my tender "wow, look, boobies!" years, I took away a cautionary tale of technology and advertising meeting in some unholy middle. We're seeing it happen, Pajibans. Vigilance must be our watchword.

Wow, look! Boobies...

Posted by: Green Lantern at July 7, 2011 9:54 AM

Dude, she's got the crazy eyes.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 7, 2011 10:21 AM

This is ridiculous. Really, that sums it up. Also, what is wrong with people?

Posted by: tamatha at July 7, 2011 10:32 AM

As dumb as this is, and it is very dumb, I still prefer it over the blatant car commercials that the writers throw into the script on "Bones."

I don't know how many of you watch that show, but to have the show's murdery, forensic stuff suddenly interrupted with a weird, out of left field, obvious mid-show commercial is irritating.

I'll take photoshopping movie posters into a show over not-so-sneaky, in script sponsor fellating any day.

Posted by: ZombieNurse at July 7, 2011 10:33 AM

this has been going on for a while now.
i thought it was just a local thing since the misplaced ads I've seen are usually for local casinos and restaurants.

Posted by: Gio_Az at July 7, 2011 10:44 AM

ZombieNurse, I am right there with you! My husband had to take a break from HIMYM after what we refer to as the BING episode. I keep telling him to watch certain Bones episodes and he will think HIMYM is subtle in their in show ads.

Posted by: Kathy at July 7, 2011 10:45 AM

The timeline, heh. You went exactly where I went, Courtney. HIMYM in particular is so focused on real time (not like "24," natch), that seeing ads from an episode's future is just incredibly jarring. I doubt they really are that noticeable, but the completely fabricated HDTV in the background of Marshall's shot, just as an excuse for a Country Strong ad, is beyond the pale.

If anything, it's a good way to market the DVDs. "Don't want fake ads? Buy the boxed set." Ka-ching!

Posted by: RobP at July 7, 2011 10:50 AM

Living in Chicago, I have seen them add stuff in the background for the Chicago Wolves (AHL hockey team). That doesn't bother me as much, because it doesn't screw with the timeline at all. However, it also makes me wonder if they are doing this as regional ads. Which seems like an even bigger waste of money.

Posted by: Stupid Rookie at July 7, 2011 11:12 AM

How many of you remember the movie "Looker". Hands please?

Right here.

I decided right then that I'm maybe OK with an unholy alliance of advertising and technology if it comes with really nice boobies. Like, say, naked Susan Dey.

Also, I want one of those flashey-gun thingies. How many grown-up nerds got into science-y stuff hoping to go all Dr. Horrible and build some cool thing they'd seen?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at July 7, 2011 11:58 AM


BTW, we know what's coming next - blipverts. Well, that's one way to solve the obesity problem.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at July 7, 2011 12:03 PM

I'm agreeing with ZombieNurse - not as bad as it could be. Silly and wasteful and definitely wtf (especially in what they are advertising!) but falls on the creepy-though-harmless side of the line.

Now I'll keep an eye out for them when I'm cooking dinner.

Posted by: Sara Tonin at July 7, 2011 12:11 PM

I'm pinning some of the blame for this one on George Lucas. The man made inserting "shit that don't belong there" into such an economical post-production tactic that it was just a matter of time before other moneygrubbers would do the same on other pieces.

You know it won't be too long before porn will have product placement logos put in strategic locations too. There will be the Starbucks™ gloryhole, the leading male/plumber will have his hog tattooed with Big Boy Burgers™ , the leading lady/sexy CEO will bend over and spread 'em just enough to see an animated ad for the next Chipmunks© movie yodeling out, and then the clumsy maid's thong has a logo for Paris Hilton's newest album/bodypaint, "Slathered"©.

Dammit it's almost enough to shut off the TV and attempt to have a real human interaction.

Posted by: bleujayone at July 7, 2011 12:22 PM

As seemingly bizarre as this is, I am admittedly intrigued as to how far down the rabbit hole of syndication the marketers are willing to go.

"Dallas" featuring ads for Twilight?
"Sports Night" with placement for Moneyball?
Bing Crosby's Christmas TV Special with casually placed copies of A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas?

Posted by: branded at July 7, 2011 12:23 PM

Wait a minute...a Bad Teacher ad in a HIMYM episode? How are we supposed to believe that that movie exists in HIMYM's world?! A movie starring Marshall? Is Marshall secretly making movies that the rest of the gang doesn't know about? Or do they know about it and they've already accepted it? That's too weird.

Posted by: Me at July 7, 2011 3:28 PM

Meh, the morons are wasting their money. Hopefully they waste enough that they get canned for it.

Posted by: Protoguy at July 7, 2011 4:14 PM

I don't really understand how all other advertising works either. How does showing someone in a bikini and then putting your logo in the corner actually make people buy more of your stuff? But it does work, I guess. it must, right?

Posted by: John. G. at July 7, 2011 8:19 PM

Friends with Benefits tote bag in tonight's Wait for It rerun.

Once you see it, IT CAN'T BE UNSEEN

Posted by: ALM at July 7, 2011 9:59 PM

And yeah, Looker was a bit more prophetic than people give it credit for. In many of ways.

Posted by: Protoguy at July 7, 2011 11:22 PM