web
counter
 

Your Illegitimate Child & You: A Lesson in PR From Your Local Marketing Professional

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Think Pieces | Comments (54)



MV5BMTMwNzM4MDk4M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTYwOTI0ODU3._V1._SX475_SY332_.jpg

As you know, in real, non-Pajiba life, my career is in the world of marketing and public relations. Every now and again, my two jobs intersect. Sometimes my workplace colleagues need to be schooled about the evils of Julia Roberts movies and the joys of Britney Spears, and sometimes action stars and former gubernatorial position-holders knock up a housekeeper and keep it secret for ten-plus years. Not unlike the bat signal, moments like this are my warning bell, for I am needed somewhere.

The news of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s secret love child has been a font of delight for celebrity gossip bloggers, a gift from writer’s block heaven. The whole ordeal has also taught us a great deal about public reaction and the angles of focus when dealing with a scandal. So, I thought it the perfect time to discuss the important lessons we’ve learned thus far, so that if and when you find yourself in a very public sex scandal, you will know what is to come.

Lesson #1: Your private nightmare will become a public joke.
Let us take a moment and ignore all layer of celebrity, political figure and fame and think of what Maria Shriver, Arnold and their children must be going through. This whole situation must be completely devastating. Maria has learned that her partner, the father of her children, was not only physically unfaithful, but that he betrayed her by lying and concealing this enormous secret for over a decade. And how does the media show its respect? By inserting a reference to a Schwarzenegger film in every headline. “Arnie cheats; Maria gets to the chopppaaaa,” “Ahhnold’s secret love child; Maria WON’T be back,” “Housekeeper was pregnant; it wasn’t a tumah!”

The lesson here is that there is nothing so serious that someone somewhere can’t find humor in it. Should you find yourself in a public scandal, know that there will be one of two reactions: a personal and emotional connection followed by a deeply personal and emotional response, or a dismissive write-off, perhaps with a joke. This stems from the fact that there are two kinds of people: those who feel they are involved in and affected by this kind of thing, and those who don’t. Though it often seems untrue, the latter is the majority.

The lesson here is don’t take yourself too seriously. No one else does.

Lesson #2: If you’re going to have a partner in scandal, make it someone low on the food chain.
The media adores a good slut shame. They love it far more when the aforementioned “slut” is someone in a lower position than the other party. One would rationally understand that this difference in status and power would tip the scales, making the co-cheater, in fact, more to blame than the other person involved, but not in the world of public scandal. In your office, if your CEO strokes your thigh and promises to leave his wife for you, that guy’s an HR violating fuck. When that party is famous, you’re a dirty whore.

Think Monica Lewinski. She was a child, an intern, and the President of the United States made his move on her. She has been branded with a scarlet letter ever since, never to lose the stain (pun super totes intended) of presidential fuck puppet, while Bill Clinton gets a fun “awesome pimp” label.

Now, this housekeeper, Mildred Patricia Baena, is at the center of a homewrecking sex scandal. TMZ has a new post every hour about how she was obsessed with Maria Shriver and wanted to be her, or photos of her dressed as a sexy pirate on Halloween fourteen years ago, that jezebelling harlot.

So if you find yourself rich, famous and desperately wanting to fuck around, ensure the person you enter/invite to enter you is a) young, b) either unemployed or employed by you—either way, it is integral that this person would rely on you, c) mildly to moderately less attractive than your spouse, d) not famous, so no one has any sort of kinship or connection to them and therefore they become the default bad guy, rendering you almost blameless.

Always, always have a scapegoat. But it only ever works if that scapegoat is a woman.

Lesson #3: If you keep low and shut up for at least a few weeks, when you emerge and make fun of yourself, the media will call it a brave comeback and you’ll be fine.
This part hasn’t happened yet, obviously. But it will. It always does. You will emerge unscathed, and everyone involved will be fine, happy and able to go on about their lives.

Except that whore of a housekeeper/intern/assistant/babysitter/etc. who, in the eyes of the media, totally had it coming, will exist solely as a punchline, will most likely be unable to ever be gainfully employed ever again and have no choice but to pose nude to feed her children. But, you being famous, will not give a fuck. Everyone wins!

Follow Courtney Enlow on Twitter.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Ginnifer Goodwin, You're Cute, Now Stop Making Movies That Inspire Me To Claw My Soul Out Of My Body | Upfronts 2011: Buffy Returns Home









Comments

Maria to Arnold: Hasta la vista, baby daddy.

Posted by: jthomas666 at May 19, 2011 2:16 PM

I could be wrong, but I think I read the Sperminator has been financially supporting the woman and their son. So...at least she's got that, I hope, for a while. Feel really sorry for all the kids involved.

Posted by: janetfaust at May 19, 2011 2:30 PM

What, exactly, is this column supposed to be? Is it supposed to be funny? A scathing commentary on the frivolity of popular reporting? A condemnation of people (men) who stray, and take advantage of people in less privileged circumstances than their own? People that may work in a subservient position already? Ok, that's fine. Write that. But make it funny, angry, incredulous. Make it worth reading. I am a liberal commie feminist whatever, so I might agree with you, if I knew what your point was. I have no idea what this is, except a waste of your time. You work in PR. Perhaps you're stretching yourself too thin.

This may be an independent movie blog, but I'd still like to read good writing. This isn't. It *is* heavy-handed and superior, much like everything else you write, while you apparently think you're being clever.

Posted by: Jenne Frisby at May 19, 2011 2:41 PM

In this case, though, Arnold has a long, drawn-out and meticulously detailed history of womanizing, so I guess you could say that this particular harlot is the culmination of a lifetime's worth of bad behavior.

Throw in the fact that the Sperminator is also a Republican (however moderate), and he's actually going to be forced into some public penance/contrition somehow.

Hollywood will forgive him as long as his next box office take is massive, but that may depend on the whole contrition thing and how it plays in middle America.

Posted by: Jerry at May 19, 2011 2:44 PM

@Jenne Frisby:
Okay. Let me see if I understand this.

You would much rather devote your valuable time to writing a highly critical missive rather than finding a more suitable blog? That's what I call a logical paradox.

Posted by: Jerry at May 19, 2011 2:46 PM

Yes, I would. Thanks for checking in!

Posted by: Jenne Frisby at May 19, 2011 2:54 PM

I'm less concerned about Jenne Frisby's budgeting of her time and more concerned about her manners.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 2:59 PM

I seems very clearly to be a light, satirical look at celebrity scandal and media response in our society, a send up of both the actions of Mr. Schwarzenegger and the (over)reactions of media and internet response. I can speak only for myself but I thought it was plenty clever and fits right in with the mid-week content of this site.

So, to put it bluntly: what's your problem, Jenne?

Posted by: Yossarian at May 19, 2011 3:00 PM

Wow, Jenne. I didn't have any problem figuring out the point, so let me help you. America loves scandal and the media thrives on it, but we almost never blame famous people, regardless of how bad the behavior, providing those people are men. The usually less-powerful women who provide the other half of the scandal are routinely demonized for doing what other women may have fantasized about - i.e., banging the celeb of their choice. The famous man generally emerges unscathed, while the women are branded from then on. The family of the cheater is also considered collateral damage, unless one or more of them is equally as famous and better liked by the gossip-guzzling public.

Posted by: RebaSays at May 19, 2011 3:11 PM

Well, I found it overly self-indulgent, which does fit fairly well into Pajiba's content. Jerry may have a point, and I am probably too young to die from a rage-induced aneurysm.
It's clearly time to move on.

Posted by: Jenne Frisby at May 19, 2011 3:15 PM

Hey Jenne,

You spell your name weird.

Love,
Matty

Posted by: Matty at May 19, 2011 3:20 PM

I wish that the only lesson in PR here was that nobody not personally involved should give a tiny rat's ass, but obviously, that will never happen.

Posted by: Slash at May 19, 2011 3:20 PM

Yeah, how come when a guy sleeps around he's cool, and when a chick does she's a whore? Right?

/god, shut up.

Posted by: jon29 at May 19, 2011 3:22 PM

I am a liberal commie feminist whatever,

Why is there any confusion over the ragey post? I think the answer is clearly identified in the body of the piece. People work out their anxiety and control issues in many ways. Some drive aggressively, some eat other people's food in the break room fridge, some write unsolicited vitriolic screeds against strangers on the internet.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 19, 2011 3:23 PM

It *is* heavy-handed and superior

As are you, Jenne.

[Y]ou apparently think you're being clever

As do you, Jenne.

I found it overly self-indulgent

As your comments have been, Jenne.

It's clearly time to move on.

Goodbye, Jenne.

Posted by: Kballs at May 19, 2011 3:26 PM

What, exactly, is this column supposed to be?
Hmm, good point. Let's see if I can help.

Is it supposed to be funny? A scathing commentary on the frivolity of popular reporting? A condemnation of people (men) who stray, and take advantage of people in less privileged circumstances than their own? People that may work in a subservient position already?

Life is so much easier when people answer their own questions.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 3:33 PM

Did you all scramble up the cliff together, so as to leap on Jenne from the greatest possible height?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 19, 2011 3:39 PM

Jerry, Bill Clinton also had an impressive history of affairs with many, many women. Monica Lewinsky was just the most famous of them as it occurred while president. While governor of Arkansas, he had many, including Gennifer Flowers. The two are pretty similar in scope of womanizing, but the major, major difference with Arnold is the fathering of a child and hiding it for over a decade. That is a far more damaging omission in my mind than the affair.

Posted by: Melody at May 19, 2011 3:42 PM

I just do what all the cool kids are doing. Coincidentally, Lemmings was on of my favorite games as a kid.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 3:44 PM

Socrates_Johnson >> A Lemmings reference too on the day we pull the same quote?!? You wouldn't by chance have the other half of this amulet, would you?

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 3:48 PM

Do you mean THIS amulet?

(I don't know about you, but I'm picturing the Auryn)

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 3:56 PM

Hey, when someone comes up in here swinging a big stick and making obnoxious comments about the site, the writers, and/or the regular commenters, they ought to be ready for a little push back. Having a dissenting opinion is one thing, making rude remarks for no reason other than to be nasty is quite another. There was a time, long before many people around here may remember, when that shit would NOT have been tolerated. When someone strolls into your living room and takes a dump on the rug, I think some response is perfectly warranted.
Besides, I am bored, and just as likely to work out MY anxiety and control issues by snarking at strangers on the internet as the next guy, I just try to use my powers for Good. Where's my whacking stick?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiUKIWSqqDM

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 19, 2011 3:56 PM

O.k. I'll actually address the topic, too. I think I must have politician sex scandal fatigue, because to some degree this whole thing just feels like more of the same. So much of the discourse falls into the sensationalistic sphere that I tend to tune it out. I guess what puts this a notch above so many of those other stories is the length of the deception and the logistics of carrying on a affair with someone that worked (and must have lived at least part of the time, I presume) in the same home. I'm all for investigating Arnold for inappropriate use of state and campaign funds, but it would be nice if the press harpies would lay off and give everyone involved privacy on the personal level.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 4:01 PM

I didn't think that it was being tolerated today. It was very thoroughly not tolerated. A veritable whacking stick measuring competitiion of not tolerating really.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 19, 2011 4:14 PM

Which formula are we using to measure the TMI of our whacking sticks again?

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 4:19 PM

Oh look, everyone's got their torches and pitchforks!

Posted by: snapnhiss at May 19, 2011 4:27 PM

It is a WHACKING STICK snapnhiss
Geez, get it right. Torches and pitchforks are for holidays and special elections.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 19, 2011 4:41 PM

It has been a little draconian.

Hey, maybe Courtney Enlow can write up a quick three point plan for what to do when you put your foot in your mouth insulting a Pajiba writer and how to deal with the ensuing backlash from hordes loyal and adoring Pajibans? (talk about clever)

But I'm holding out for the Jo Rob follow up think piece- Chivalry or chauvinism: Are we overprotective of our female bloggers And is this a form of audience to author pandering?

Posted by: Yossarian at May 19, 2011 4:48 PM

I found Courtney's little effort here to be somewhat amusing, a satirical jab at the stark reality of the scandal-based media. Paparazzi don't deserve much sympathy, as I consider them to be about the same as jackals or other scavengers.

I think the two actual victims in this are Maria Shriver and the teenaged boy who'll be stalked for about another six months (and probably need lots of therapy afterward).

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 19, 2011 4:57 PM

Agree, The Wanderer,
If there are any victims in this whole thing it is surely the children of the people involved, who now get to deal with a shit storm of media and gossip, all because PEOPLE love a good scandal to distract themselves from the tedium and quiet desperation of their own lives. I have absolutely no pity party to throw for any of the adults involved. Maria and Arnold's marriage is their buisness, and as far as I can tell all sex was between consenting adults, therefore absolutely NONE of my concern. The Continuing Adventures of Celebrity Penis is a really boring saga.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 19, 2011 5:23 PM

I may be new here, but that's probably the first time someone's called LindsEy a chauvinist.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 5:25 PM

I found Courtney's little effort here to be somewhat amusing..."

Now THAT is a comment to be leapt on a from a great height.

How wonderfully patronizing! How deliciously condescending!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at May 19, 2011 5:31 PM

Where was I called a Chauvinist? And no, it wouldn't be the first time.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at May 19, 2011 5:37 PM

Somehow, I suspect that The Governator's baby-momma reveal ain't the culmination of his squat-thrusting career. He's far from dead, rich, famous & charismatic with a now-confirmed willingness to indulge himself & damn the consequences. Unleashed from the constraints of office and no doubt shortly marriage, I foresee an orgy of pumping iron in Conan's future.

/rant

Yet, why be surprised at the inevitable rehabilitation of The Arnold. He's a product. The free ink of scandal just boosts his name recognition, and frankly, lubricates his reengagement back into the entertainment industry's tight, engulfing embrace. The star maker machinery hasn't had much hold on him for a while now. Time to stoke it, Arnie-baby.

Hugh Grant. The former Libido in Chief. Let us not omit the other current kerfuffle involving the once-presumptive Next President of La Belle France and an inconvenient chambermaid - Mon Dieu! How could such a prole presume to damage such a great man? (Caste system among the egalite much, dear froggy intellectuals?) They get off after they get off because they are good fodder behind the popular song, the hit movie, the political movement or campaign.

Whoever owns the channel, taking their cut, isn't interested in what's bought & sold only in having a transaction to broker or a movement to ride hard and put away wet. For that they need a product, an offer, content, baby, and scandal only jacks that up. What sort of show does Leno of the Leering Chin have without hosting the former Mr. Hurley throwing the Divine Ms. Brown under the (back of the) class-warfare bus. Seriously, in the in-group, out-group sweepstakes, Hugh hit the exploitation quint-fecta at one go with that one. He's a goer, clearly, but how is this guy still working, like ever? Oh, right, child-rapists get a pass if they're auteurs, and besides she was in the business, so clearly asking for it.

One shills a false image and the whiff of power, another is the scented mannequin to be worked. The trade is faux-offer for ersatz-value, yet there are the consumers, kneeling before the demi-gods they deserve taking the Air-Rotica package deal anyway. Miss Nandi wouldn't stand for such, which is why the degenerate power-weenies were so bent over her ways.

In "entertainment" as in politics it's the perennial return of Joe Gideon, who never really left, a man of great talent yet allowing himself once again to be adored but not loved. Meanwhile we post-process his cautionary tale into 3D because there's money in a re-release. They made some coin from colorizing Casablanca, didn't they?

This is decidedly not a liberal, commie, feminist - talk about legitimate issues becoming movements hijacked by the damaged, BTW - BUT, I won't stand for this sort of tool.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at May 19, 2011 5:38 PM

Chivalry or chauvinism: Are we overprotective of our female bloggers And is this a form of audience to author pandering?

I inferred this meant all those leaping to Ms. Enlow's defense.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at May 19, 2011 5:43 PM

Yossarian >> As an adjunct to your chauvinism experiment, I (a male) could write a particularly vapid think piece (perhaps I already have) to see how enthusiastic a defense the Pajibans muster against the inevitable critiques. Of course, there could be some experimental bias unrelated to gender. Regardless, it wasn't the content of Jenne Frisby's remarks that bothered me as much as the tone and delivery. I have no issues with polite dissent.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at May 19, 2011 6:24 PM

Listen sista we ain’t talking about some goddamn drunk driving arrest, we talking about pussy. And the rule is when pussy is involved, there is no rule. The only thing ahnold has to do is keep the divorce as low keyed as possible. The good thing is that, that Kennedy broad doesn't seem to be one of those loud drama loving chicks, so in that respect he has it good. Apologize a few more times in public and then go out and make a really great action movie and the masses will be caressing your balls once again.

Posted by: Pookie at May 19, 2011 6:30 PM

Lindsey, you are very correct, and I apologize - I should have included Maria and Arnold's four kids.

Mrs. Julien, I hadn't planned on that. I was striving for a mild and diplomatic tone. Sorry if it didn't come out that way.

As for Arnold: "Let him contemplate his error upon the Tree of Woe ... crucify him."

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 19, 2011 6:59 PM

His "tree" is what got him in trouble in the first place.

Posted by: Pookie at May 19, 2011 8:59 PM

what confused me is that maria is a skeleton and this woman is an extra value meal away from fat. Soooo Arnold just bangs anything that cant get out of his way?

Posted by: logan at May 19, 2011 9:39 PM

One could write a master's thesis on the sociological components at play in any given Pajiba comment section.

Posted by: Dingles at May 19, 2011 9:46 PM

BierceAmbrose, what the hell are you talking about with ...Hugh hit the exploitation quint-fecta at one go with that one. He's a goer, clearly, but how is this guy still working, like ever? Oh, right, child-rapists get a pass if they're auteurs, and besides she was in the business, so clearly asking for it.

Divine Brown was 26 when she was arrested with Grant. She was a street walker that agreed to give him oral sex in his car. So what atrocity did he commit that caused you to go off in this overblown little tirade?

Posted by: snapnhiss at May 19, 2011 9:54 PM

Haven't read the article yet, haven't read any comments yet; I just want to thank you for the header/title. Reading it has made my busy and ridiculous day.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at May 19, 2011 10:42 PM

I understand how enjoyable it is to reveal the abject hypocrisy of "family values" advocates, but surely ALL politicians cheat (the lust for power is actually a lust for tail and power opens legs), but why does it always seem to be Republicans who are caught?

Posted by: Xiufetish at May 19, 2011 10:53 PM

While I get what you are going for here, I don't know that the male gender gets quite the free pass this article implies. There was plenty of shaming of David Arquette when everyone believed that he had cheated on Courtney Cox and, oddly enough, even more shaming when he came to his own defense to explain that their not-his-choice separation came long before he wet his noodle.

Nobody sprung to the defense of David Boreanaz for cheating on his wife, and I don't recall the girls he cheated with being demonized particularly for their parts in the affairs. Jesse James seemed to take a much bigger beating than that Nazi tattoo girl he cheated on Sandra Bullock with. Hell, the whole Tiger Woods scandal saw Tiger getting "slut-shamed" quite a bit worse than the porn stars and strippers he was sleeping with. I see a bit of selection bias in your argument when it comes to men getting leniency for cheating.

I was going to say that maybe you are right in the political arena, but the career of former VP candidate John Edwards puts the kibosh on that argument as well. Poor Mark Sanford couldn't even hike the Appalachian trail without getting slut-shamed. I don't think it is wise to draw too big of a conclusion based on Clinton and Schwarzenegger; those two are so damn likable they could piss on the pope and Catholics would still send them Christmas cards.

Posted by: Douchebag McGee at May 19, 2011 11:15 PM

Reading it again, maybe I am getting the "cheating men have it easy" vibe as much from the comments as the original post, I dunno. BierceAmbrose's rant up there is a particularly incoherent argument that I can't quite wrap my mind around.

Posted by: Douchebag McGee at May 19, 2011 11:19 PM

One could write a master's thesis on the sociological components at play in any given Pajiba comment section.

Posted by: Dingles at May 19, 2011 9:46 PM

Yes, agreed. Though this comment section was particularly disturbing. Kind of felt like Jenne disagreed with the folks in 1984 or something (even if she was incredibly rude.) And look! Gone!

Back to the post itself: Even though I work in news and have been bombarded with the Arnold stuff, I've kind of been tuning it out. It's easy for me to do - really, it requires no effort at all - so why can't others just let it go? I just feel really bad for the child.

Posted by: denesteak at May 20, 2011 1:50 AM

@Douchebag McGee - Actually this was covered in Lesson#2, part c). Never cheat on the adorable. They'll be the ones getting the sympathy.

Posted by: NateS1973 at May 20, 2011 9:27 AM

I love that Arnold's son is half-cholo. He's an Austricholo! He's basically the most dangerous human being in the world. Strong jaw + Sharpie eyebrows a perfect star make.

Posted by: Sofia at May 20, 2011 12:03 PM

Much-belated correction ... adding a line I accidentally blew-away.

" ...Seriously, in the in-group, out-group sweepstakes, Hugh hit the exploitation quint-fecta at one go. He's a goer, clearly, but how is this guy still working, like ever? Oh, right, child-rapists get a pass if they're auteurs, and besides she was in the business, so clearly asking for it. Grant engaged a pro, of age, in a mere tasteless illegality. At this point he counts as a role model."

It's inconvenient when my next meeting shows up when I'm in mid-rant. (Not that kind of meeting.)

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at May 21, 2011 8:48 PM

There’s nothing, absolutely nothing, that can topped the feeling of knowing the first time that you’re pregnant. In fact, in my thinking, whatever emotion you have upon learning, whether you want the pregnancy or not, is the strongest and purest of all. Preparation Handbook has helped me a lot during my pregnancy. It’s one of the tangible things that I was able to draw comfort and peace from.

Posted by: Larae Hillen at June 5, 2011 2:02 PM

Perfection. This is truly a great article. It was exactly the info. I needed. I will be back.

Posted by: wedding on a budget of 3000 at June 7, 2011 12:07 PM

Was looking for info on that. I wrote it off as merely another price, but I'm going to have a look at it yet again.

Posted by: Rubin Lascaro at June 9, 2011 10:35 PM

Okay so Tiger Woods is out of the running for the immediate future but so what? He's been through rather more than many men could cope with and still he's hung in there (literally) swinging. It won't be long before the Tiger comes roaring back :-)

Posted by: Car Accessories at June 29, 2011 10:25 PM