web
counter
 

Internet Killed the TV Subscription

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Think Pieces | Comments (44)



large_tv-static.jpg

It really started half as an accident, the way most great things do, like penicillin and dipping french fries in soft serve ice cream. Our cable bill had gradually ratcheted up to an unholy amount, and when we moved over the winter, we decided to just get the stripped-down cable that amounts to basically a glorified antenna instead of the 70-channel standard. It would save a few bucks, and if we were happy with it, we could just get one of those actual antenna jobs and then ditch cable entirely. Of course, the experiment was intensified by the cable guy screwing up the install so that none of the cable jacks in the house were live except for the one plugged into the cable modem. So complaints led to assurances that the problem could be fixed for just a $50 service fee, which led to profanity and procrastination. And it left us for some time watching only what the TiVo had recorded before the move and what we could watch online. That turned out to be pretty much everything we ever watched anyway.

A funny thing happened while the movie studios and television networks were throwing hissy fits and lawsuits for the last decade, blaming every downtick in their industry on dastardly internet pirates and taking not the slightest moment of introspection about the quality of their product. They actually realized that perhaps millions of people seeking out and downloading their products was indicative not of a need for a police state, but of a business opportunity.

Go to Google, type the name of a television show. Pretty much everything that’s not on a premium channel like HBO or Showtime is up there now on its own official site in full episode glory. It’s still not perfect; the networks still generally insist on only putting up the last five broadcast episodes, which can be dreadfully confusing when some of those are reruns, but it’s a sight better than it’s ever been before. And some shows have been particularly progressive about the matter. “South Park” has all fourteen seasons up on their website, which has been great since there were about three seasons that I didn’t get to watch for one reason or another a few years back. That’s exactly the promise Internet video has held that the studios have been missing out on for all these years: instant, on-demand content. People weren’t pirating because they were anarcho-communists (well, most of them), but because the networks wouldn’t sell them the product they wanted at any price.

The catch has always been one of revenue, a particularly hilarious obstacle given that this is an industry that quite literally has given its product away for free for over fifty years. They take their content, broadcast it into the atmosphere and then go nuclear when people start watching those moving pictures on a screen plugged into a box under their desk instead of a box on top of their DVD player. While the notion of giving something away for free and charging money for advertisements interspersed throughout it is a patently absurd idea, the networks have already managed to square that circle and get advertisers to buy into the gimmick decades since. The only difference between paying millions to advertise on television and millions to advertise on the Internet is that with the former there’s a delusion of impact that cannot be maintained with the information feedback of the latter.

They haven’t gotten all the way there yet. The fact that the only full episodes of the last season of “The Office” I can watch online right now through Hulu are episodes 1, 4, 5, 10 and 26, because those are the last arbitrarily rerun episodes on broadcast, is just surreal. God forbid you missed episode 25 and don’t want to spoil the ending of the season. If they’d just take the plunge and cut that connection to broadcast entirely, they’d probably get better viewership online. The irony is that if you’re a regular television watcher, this means it’s easier for you to cut the television cord than the sort of person who just lets the TiVo record twenty episodes before marathoning them. If you’re doing that with a show like “The Office,” you might end up SOL watching online, at least until the network decides to toss up a bunch of old seasons during the dead months between seasons. But then, if you do that with shows that keep the entire archive up, you’re just fine.

The one enormous caveat is sports, which tend to be far behind the curve. Despite links on the NFL.com insisting that the game could be watched live online, we never could get the Super Bowl to actually show up on the computer screen and had to watch that on the neutered television instead. That’s pretty damned close to a deal breaker, but if you only watch the big sports that broadcast on network, then you can get that from an antenna instead of paying for cable.

The biggest causality of cutting off cable is that it finishes the execution of channel flipping started by DVRs. I remember the biggest thing I noticed when I first got a TiVo was that I watched far less television, because whenever I turned on the TV, I could easily find something to watch and then I’d shut it off. I rarely would spend an hour mindnumbingly flipping through stations. Switching television watching exclusively to online, there just aren’t channels to flip through in the first place, they’re an unnecessary artifact of a different delivery mechanism. Having retained just the twenty station basic local package, I can tell you, there isn’t much to flip through once you knock off all those miscellaneous channels. PBS has a huge variety of interesting documentaries, and I could really write a thousand words just on the weird stuff I’ve watched over the last few months at midnight on public access, but flipping just becomes an unsatisfactory exercise with so few channels.

The bottom line is that we were able to keep watching everything that we’d been watching before the cord got cut.

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 06/16/10 | The Most Promising Actors Under 25









Comments

In my apartment the roomie and I decided we didn't need cable anymore. Neither of us really watched TV anyways. During football season I simply went to the bar.

We found that every show we wanted to watch was online. Sure, it might take a few hours after it airs to post but I don't care. So I had to watch the Season 3 premiere of True Blood at 3am. Or I had to watch The Pacific at 1am. About the only show I couldn't fucking find was Justified. Did I mention I watch them all commercial free? God bless the internet.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at June 16, 2010 2:08 PM

I haven't had cable in any form for the last 3 years. Prior to that, we'd had only the local service for a year or two.

We noticed the same things immediately: if there wasn't anything good on our 6 local stations, we'd turn the damned thing off or watch a movie. TBS & TNT had been the downfall of our gym memberships years prior, with their nightly back-to-back (-to-back) Law & Order fests, and that habit was blissfully gone. GONE. Sweet alleluia!

Netflix, Hulu, and TiVo fill any voids, and ESPN360 is available for free to FiOS customers.

Posted by: ahamos at June 16, 2010 2:15 PM

This will cause a thumb obesity epidemic. Just you wait!

Posted by: Scully at June 16, 2010 2:18 PM

Amen to that!
I have been cable free for almost two years, and I still make sure to see all the shows that I truely want to watch. Streaming Netflix, Hulu, my good old fashioned antenna, or just spending 1.99 and the iTunes store. Why should I pay fucking Comcast 110 bucks every fucking month to literally spend an hour just flipping through channels that I really just don't want?

Thankfully, I have elderly neighbors who have no idea how to secure their wireless network. They've lived there for ten years and have no plans to move until they die. I spend maybe 20 bucks a month.

Posted by: Schpida (he is our hero) at June 16, 2010 2:28 PM

We haven't had cable for months. We got an HD antennae, a blu-ray player with Wi-fi, and started our Netflix subscription up again. I want to watch a television show? Check Netflix. Not streaming? I'll pop the discs to the top of the queue. The kid wants to watch something? She can stream SpongeBob or Angry Beaver or Scooby Doo movies. We're saving a shit-ton of money, we aren't leaving the television on just for noise, we aren't watching crap just because it is on. And hopefully by football season the promised Fox Sports Channel will be live on our blu-ray.

Of course this also means I've had to suffer through The Husband's nostalgia in the form of all seasons of Greatest American Hero, Charles in Charge, and now The A-Team.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at June 16, 2010 2:31 PM

It’s still not perfect; the networks still generally insist on only putting up the last five broadcast episodes

This is something I am getting tired of running into. Have they said why they do this?

Posted by: EricD at June 16, 2010 2:32 PM

We've also gone without cable for almost a year now. I thought it would be horrible and it's not. Not at all. When I go to my parents' house, I make an attempt at channel-flipping and I just can't.

But when my internet goes wonky, you should see the panic-stricken hissy fit that happens in my living room. Because not only does it mean I can't watch what I want to watch, it means I might actually have to go to my office to work and I don't like that.

Posted by: MyySharona at June 16, 2010 2:39 PM

I tried living without a telly for 8 months a while ago. Remember feeling left out of water-cooler conversations at the office on Lost (it was 2005 and we were still on s1 -- people watched it religiously), Desperate Housewives and later Chaser's War On Everything. It was upsetting mainly because I wasn't getting any of the jokes that relied on one-liners from last night's episodes, or assumed the knowledge of what had happened there; by the time I'd see it online it would be old news already.... Never again, I say.

Posted by: SB at June 16, 2010 2:55 PM

We recently downgraded our cable package for money reasons and haven't missed any of those channels. We would eliminate premiums entirely if it weren't for HBO original programming (I know we could watch it online, but our computers aren't that great for streaming video).

The one category I would truly miss if we let go of cable is kids' programming. The ability to record specific shows for my 4 year old that don't make me want to pull all my hair out is invaluable.

But we are intrigued by the streaming Netflix option, and just might give it a try one day soon.

Posted by: Michellers at June 16, 2010 2:58 PM

We've had over-the-air TV for about 11 years using an old antenna in the attic. Moving to digital cut the number of passably watchable channels, but did add several Chinese, Russian, Spanish PBS, and "retro" channels. (That "This" channel (we have two) is only campy and cute for about a month, and then you want to put its eye out.)

Anyhoo, a couple years ago we got the 3 DVD Netflix subscription and thought we were Gods of Super Tech. Suddenly we didn't have to wait 3 weeks for a new release to become available at the library - it was great. This service didn't reduce our mindless channel flipping or brighten the nightly news much, but it seemed better, hipper, more convenient.

Now enter the Roku box with Netflix & renting from Amazon. We almost never watch OTA TV or DVDs anymore. I don't know how much cable/satellite costs per month, but this set up suits us just fine & we don't have to give Comcast any $$$$. If we could remove Verizon from the process, it'd be even better.

Posted by: GinKirk at June 16, 2010 3:07 PM

Deist: Justified is on Hulu, although the "last five episode" rule applies. Same for all of the FX originals I think.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd WilsonAuthor Profile Page at June 16, 2010 3:16 PM

I did the no cable thing in college. My roommates and I decided to nix the cable and we were fine. We all had dvd players and computers (and we got the basic channels).

The only downside? Not getting to try out new shows. Always Sunny arrived during that period and so I ended up missing out. Without premium channels and the option to surf, I found I couldn't be bothered to track down shows I wasn't already attached to. I know that Netflix is an option now and shows on DVD, but I worry for potentially great shows.

I know I lament the passing of Pushing Daisies all the time, but it frustrates me that good shows get lost on their prime audience. Average Americans still glue themselves to TV, therefor, Nielson ratings and TV ads are still king. But when niche viewers go to mediums that impact finances less (internet, netflix, etc.) good shows get dumped. I just wish there was a better system for rewarding great shows that don't pull the numbers like, say, American Idol.

I have cable now and because of it I got pulled onto great shows in the premium channels, but I'd like to be free of it, too. I just don't want to have to free myself at the cost of great entertainment.

Posted by: Kayanne at June 16, 2010 3:18 PM

Amen to all that. Cable-free five years and counting. The only show we currently follow that we can't get online (through Hulu or the show's page) is Doctor Who. Interestingly enough, the whole reason I got hooked on Doctor Who was because Netflix was streaming it.

Posted by: Rob at June 16, 2010 3:31 PM

Netflix is filling the gap left by Hulu. You can stream all the episodes of The Office excluding the last season there.

Oh, and each episode of Party Down shows up on Netflix streaming a week after airing. i recommend that. It's everything The Office used to be.

There were rumors of Hulu moving toward a subscription system, which though irritating, is still ridiculously cheaper than cable.

Posted by: Scott at June 16, 2010 3:56 PM

Maybe other people feel this way too -- I don't have DVR, and watching live TV feels almost burdensome, like, what if I have to go to the bathroom? What if someone comes to the door or I have a last-minute errand?

I end up waiting and watching them OnDemand or online anyway, so I don't have to worry about missing anything.

Posted by: Caroline at June 16, 2010 4:15 PM

Ha, just this weekend I found out how good it is to not have cable. We went to my in-laws', and they have their huge TV with about 100 channels. I spent about 4 hours just flipping through while MrFig worked on their computers, and the ONLY thing I could settle on were episodes of Cake Boss, which is online and I think Instant Netflix and Keeping Up With the Kardashians, which just grossed me out enough to know I'd never watch it again. Everything else was just...so useless. I have my basic broadcast channels and my high speed connection and Netflix, so there is just absolutely NO need for us to spend any money on cable.

It felt good to figure that out.

Posted by: figgy at June 16, 2010 4:38 PM

because whenever I turned on the TV, I could easily find something to watch and then I’d shut it off.

We haven't had a TV for three years and it has vastly improved our lives. I love that watching shows on the internet involves a finite amount of time. I love that Bill O'Reilly can't get on my computer. Or coverage of oil spills.

RE: sports - ESPN 360 is amazing. If I can get every college basketball game, I wonder why the NFL has so much trouble showing me football.

Posted by: Sbrown at June 16, 2010 5:01 PM

I'm kind of shocked that pay channels like HBO and Showtime haven't started either partnering with Netflix like Starz or charging by the episode like itunes. It just makes so much sense. I don't want HBO and Showtime all the time but I really like their original series and wouldn't mind paying to see them online. Right now I'm deciding how much I want to reduce my cable consumption and I think I'm pretty much persuaded that I won't be missing anything if I just get rid of it entirely.

Posted by: king at June 16, 2010 5:15 PM

Cable TV is proof the nation built by our immigrant forefathers is now inhabited by inbred, illiterate, entitled, fucktards.

Subscription TV was commercial free entertainment at it's inception. That was kind of the whole point.

Now the programing day has been reduced to 12 hrs. The hour long program has been reduced to 42 minutes. Commercials are run 24 hours non-stop. Including over the actual shows rendering them unwatchable.

The privilege to crane your neck like an idiot around a bouncing Network logo during a close-up costs $1,500 a year. Roughly.

For the same money you could watch TV on the internet. Own a complete DVD set of every single show you were ever remotely interested in. And put the rest into the kids college fund.

But hey... We are talking about the same people who drive SUVs, buy water, and think a happy meal is somehow food.

Posted by: IJ Reilly at June 16, 2010 5:23 PM

I'm about 3/4's of the way to pitching the cable subscription. We dropped to basic 20-something channel cable last month and my mother-in-law (whom stays with us about once a week to baby sit in the evenings) has been pissy about it. But at the same time, her technical competence doesn't give her the ability to navigate anything more complex than channel up and down.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at June 16, 2010 5:23 PM

Unemployed, I moved to a cheaper apartment last summer that didn't have any kind of TV hook up. I had my TV, but I only ever watched one or two DVDs on it. We also had crap internet and for a while had to steal from across the street and hold our computers up to the windows to get any connection. In my previous apartment I pretty much spent all my time shacked up with our DVR, usually with my computer in my lap, so this was a giant change.

I loved it. I lived 2 blocks from the library and read constantly, I went to sleep on a normal schedule because I didn't have TV/computer keeping my up for hours, and I was forced to go out and see my friends if I wanted to do anything besides read.

Granted, since it was the summer, there wasn't much new programming on anyways, but I still haven't gotten caught up with shows that started again during my TV-less state, and... eh. Whatever.

Posted by: SaBrina at June 16, 2010 5:30 PM

Re "If they’d just take the plunge and cut that connection to broadcast entirely, they’d probably get better viewership online."

They don't care about getting viewership online. Not as long as they can still get more people watching it on TV (either when it airs or a few days after). Nielsen will start counting online viewership later this year. Supposedly, the networks will come up with ways to keep people who stream shows online from skipping or fast-forwarding through commercials.

So enjoy your commercial-free viewing while you can. Sorry.

Posted by: Slash at June 16, 2010 5:33 PM

Ok I am intrigued but confused by the technical side of all this. Do you watch these shows on your laptop?or is the Netflix thing for your TV?

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at June 16, 2010 5:41 PM

And as for why they won't put a lot of sports online - seriously, you can't figure that out?

Sports channels are the biggest moneymakers for the cable providers. Those giant, lucrative contracts for TV rights are what all the sports teams (college too, in addition to pro) dream of. Why the fuck would ESPN or CBS let you stream their shit for a minimal fee online when they can get almost $3 each for every cable TV subscriber from Comcast or Time Warner?

The Atlantic Coast Conference got $560 million over 10 years for its TV rights. That contract expires in 2011 and it hopes to come close to the SEC's contract amount. The SEC's contracts with CBS and ESPN are worth a combined $3 billion over 15 years (and went into effect this year). CBS and ESPN gotta pay for that somehow. Guess how. As for pro sports, the Monday Night Football contract alone is worth (supposedly) over $1 billion a year.

Posted by: Slash at June 16, 2010 5:47 PM

Snuggie, I bought the blu-ray specifically so we wouldn't have to hook the laptop up to the television every time we wanted to stream something. Now we stream it from Netflix on our blu-ray or on the Wii straight to our big 'ol television.

Also, since I bought the antennae, I didn't miss any of Lost and can still watch all of the network shows in HD that looks ten times better than what I was paying the cable company for.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at June 16, 2010 6:21 PM

huh. you haven't learned to stream netflix.

Posted by: jubilat at June 16, 2010 6:25 PM

As I'm looking to move back to the US soon, I considere forgoing the cable option and just going with internet. The sticking point for me (and my fiancee) was American football. There is just no internet option that replaces NFL in HD.

Posted by: WestCoastPat at June 16, 2010 6:53 PM

Inspired by this I went to the internet in search of the one show I've been missing because the cable co. doesn't have BBC. I Google Dr. Who, go to the site, Episodes! Cool! My plans for the evening just changed! Click on the first one...Not available in your area. Well, I know it's not available in my area, that's why I'm trying to watch on the internet. What the hell! Is it because I'm from Wisconsin? Do they not think I can handle Dr. Who? I assure you I can.

So even with the internet AND cable, you can't always get what you want.

Posted by: RedBellyFool at June 16, 2010 8:45 PM

RedBellyFool: "Doctor Who" is available for purchase on iTunes. That's how I've watched the last couple of seasons.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd WilsonAuthor Profile Page at June 16, 2010 9:04 PM

I hate to admit any of this so I'm using fakeyname...we have a networked computer serving downloaded Divx and Avis of almost everything we want to our tv - HD content plays very nicely too. (We live in a non-Netflix-having country, we're poor as hell, and suitably ridden with guilt so we don't watch much at all).

My boyfriend obtained the special 'key' to turn on a cable connection again (which we had removed after a nice period of accidental service) and this time they called and told us they could see we were receiving the signal - and shouldn't be. So that technology has changed in recent times - used to be you could get away with it as long as you weren't in an apartment building (which has high turnover and therefore more likely that you'll be noticed when the setup guy shows up).

The only channel we ever used once we nabbed it back for that short while was the kiddie channel - you can't imagine a small child's ability to repeat content ad nauseaum. It was mostly for my sanity!

Previous to our current set up, we were serving Divx etc off a mod-chipped Xbox with a 20 Gig drive, which became pretty arduous since once you have the Emulator OS set up for it and your drive partitioned, it's a whack pain to update, and can't handle HD too well.

But I think the kernel of truth here is that TV is essentially grossly mediocre content served up to an imprisoned audience of little Alex boychiks. In any industry where the reefs and shoals of profit are so clearly demarked, you'll find a serious reluctance to evolve.

Posted by: le sigh at June 16, 2010 11:55 PM

Bittorrent and Usenet no need for anything else.

Posted by: ZAGA at June 17, 2010 12:03 AM

No Hulu in Canada. No streaming Netflix unless you buy yet another box (no way) ... and then it's only "select" films. TiVo Premiere not available in Canada. And my main reason for having cable at all is sports-related, which I currently have no way of a) watching live online without paying more fees, and b) recording online.

Still not seeing a reason to give up cable.

Posted by: Hybrid at June 17, 2010 10:43 AM

"Still not seeing a reason to give up cable."

How many Happy Meal holders is your SUV equipped with?

Posted by: IJ Reilly at June 17, 2010 6:10 PM

Uhm... that was quite interesting :)

Posted by: lavoro da casa at November 18, 2010 11:09 AM

Uhm... that was quite interesting :)

Posted by: lavoro da casa at November 18, 2010 1:14 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Luis at November 26, 2010 6:28 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Rogelio Spelman at January 5, 2011 10:33 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 16, 2011 8:58 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 16, 2011 10:41 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 17, 2011 2:59 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 17, 2011 4:47 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading system at January 18, 2011 10:36 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading system at January 19, 2011 2:33 AM

I got what you intend,bookmarked , very nice internet site .

Posted by: Johnna Beebe at February 13, 2011 8:38 AM