web
counter
 

Killer Extinct: The Death of the Boogeyman

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Think Pieces | Comments (30)



scream-2.jpg

When you were a child, you always knew what was coming to kill you. You had just watched him dispatch several dimwitted teens about an hour ago on a fuzzy VHS tape from your local purveyor of slasher flicks. You could rest assured that whatever came out of the closet would live on past your doomed slaying in endless sequels of descending quality. We had killers like Michael Myers, Freddy Kreuger, Leatherface, and Jason Voorhees. Today’s kids have … Michael Myers, Freddy Krueger, Leatherface, and Jason Voorhees. But where are our new boogeymen? What ever happened to the franchise slayer butcher on a budget? Have we run out of ideas for catchy killers like I’m running out of rhetorical questions?

We started with the classics: the Universal monsters like Dracula, The Wolfman, Frankenstein’s monster, The Mummy, the Creature From the Black Lagoon. These ancients earned their keep — like a Sinatra record, they never go out of style. Even with re-envisionings of their styles and stories, they’ll always be cool. And then the keys were passed over to a new generation of maniacs with axes and machetes and butcher knives. They took out teens like drunk driving. And they have taken their place in the hall of fame. But instead of getting a new rookie crop, we’re just getting re-envisionings. But I want my new league of extraordinary menace-men. It’s time for fresh blood.

As much as I lament the remakes, I understand them. It’s an easy buck in an unsure economy. No matter how terribly you make your film (and believe me, Bay, they’re shit) or how you swap atmosphere for speedcutting, you’re guaranteed an extra ten mil at the box office. But you can’t tell me that there’s not room for a new warrior on the mesa. The late seventies and early eighties gave us our best crop for the supernatural unstoppables, be they magical-mystic beasties or simple ghouls from the grave intent on chopping up teen proxies for them what done them wrong. Even as some of the Fantasmagoric Four were running into their fourth or fifth sequels, we were hitting hard with a decent crop of second stringers: The Leprechaun, The Tall Man — you know, the guys from my Boogeyman articles that you loved so much.

Around the nineties, we ran out of steam. I think the trend kind of capped out with Hellraiser and Candyman. Not that these were the death knell because of their terrible nature. Far from it. Well, the sequels were shitty, but shitty-delightful. I’m not sure whether Wes Craven killed them with Scream. You can’t really call Ghostface Killer a stalker per se, because he’s more of a mask than an actual stalker. Sure, as Craven was quick to point out, Jason’s mother donned the hockey mask for the first flick, but it was pure Jason from then on out. Well, Ghostface has never been a killer, but he’s been two or three or 27 different motherfuckers in the later flicks. But right around the release of Scream, our butchers went back to their watery graves. They disappeared on their shelves, only to be dusted off and hawked like yard sale merchandise to the highest rights bidder.

Now, I’m not saying horror films need to be exclusively slasher. I mean, we’ve been doing a great job with the atmospheric horror, more or less. I still think foreign shores are showing up the American filmmakers, who’s only response seems to be adding the kids who sing autotune on Disney or MTV, and the staunch refusal to hold a static shot for more than it takes to tweet. I’m even digging the trend for comic horror, as some of what makes Freddy king was his ability to quip. But we’ve got no slasher anti-heroes. Not even bad ones.

I think the closest we’ve got right now is Jigsaw, but he suffers the same cringing trend as Ghostface in that there’s no real Jigsaw but just steampunk ricky-tick that cuts people up. A case could also be made for Hatchet, as he’s getting the sequel, but really there’s miles to go before he gets even remotely close to the major leagues. And that’s pretty much it. When Leslie Vernon went to make his rise, did he realize there was no one to join? In the past two decades, we’ve got nothing.

I’m calling for a change. The next bad guy’s gotta be hiding under the bed of some twisted little miscreant, waiting to hit the pages of a poorly-typed screenplay. I don’t even want legendary. Almost all of our favorite baddies are completely derivative. They come from shamefully exploitative flicks. We don’t want quality. We want someone we can get behind — who’ll turn around at the last minute and eviscerate us. I’ve seen tons of promising horror in the indie circuits, but nobody’s bringing us the juicy meat. It’s gone torture porn or twitching kiddie, and I’m praying for someone new to keep the kids up at night. I don’t want to be grossed out, I want to go back to rooting for a maniac to chop up those goddamn Abercrombie ads littering the malls.

But who’s it gonna be?









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Too Much Cuteness. Can't Resist | Emma Stone Rocks Hester Prynne | Pajiba Love 05/13/10









Comments

What about Captain Spaulding and the Firefly family from those Rob Zombie movies? They're plenty creepy, right?

Posted by: Kyle at May 13, 2010 12:11 PM

My daughter is scared of monkeys. And Swiper. Let's not forget Swiper.

Posted by: Kballs at May 13, 2010 12:12 PM

Heigl.

Posted by: The Other Agent Johnson at May 13, 2010 12:22 PM

I'm thinking the new legacy Boogeyman figure is Jigsaw, which is pretty darn sad. He's been dead for three films already and is still the main villain of the series. We really do need a new breed of indestructible super-stalker/killers in cinema and it's just not happening. If they don't mess up Husk (in release and post-test-screening edits), the creepy scarecrows could fit the bill, but I'm not banking on that being a big hit. Maybe if that The Strangers sequel happens and doesn't destroy everything good about the original (though with Liz Tyler coming back and a revenge fantasy logline, it's not looking pretty), the trio of faceless stalkers could fit the bill, as well.


It's just all the successful horror films have been featuring one-off villains or hands-off/unseen villains. As much as I hated Paranormal Activity, the film resonated strongly with audiences and featured some of the classic stalking elements of the 80s horror icons. The Saw series is in the vein of the slasher sequels that one-upped the predecessors with more ridiculous deaths; they haven't quite had their Jason Takes Manhattan punch-out or Dream Warriors wizard destruction yet, but subtlety and camp have never been the focus of the Saws. The Final Destinations reached the heights of camp and destruction, but never established an actual villain.

I can't exactly hold my breath waiting for a Lucky McKee or James Gunn type to actually get a budget (well, they both did at one point) and a major distribution deal (actually fulfilled, not Nerfed at the last moment) to guarantee a novel horror concept gets a chance to become a series. What I don't understand is why successful one-offs like Dead Silence that could be series in the 80s vein of horror don't ever get sequels, while mediocre remakes of 80s properties routinely have sequels planned.

Posted by: Robert at May 13, 2010 12:23 PM

I believe this was covered in the Five Hair Styles More Inexplicable Than The Bieber SRL.

Posted by: Mokey at May 13, 2010 12:34 PM

Good idea for a post. We really don't have anyone new and we're only bastardizing the legendary killers of the 80's and 90's with crappy re-imaginings.

The idea that Jigsaw is the best thing we have is terribly sad. I can see some potential for Hatchet, but I personally thought that film was overrated.

Everything we have now tends to be one-and-done, with filmmakers seemingly not interested in starting a franchise killer. But is that really a bad thing? I think (as you've mentioned) that foreign horror is taking the genre in the right direction - toward concepts with something new to say.

Posted by: Matt at May 13, 2010 12:41 PM

Nice shout out to Leslie Vernon. I'm still holding out for a sequel to that one. And "Hatchet" was pretty bad. Some decent kills but the humor was forced and it wasn't scary at all. I think it's time to let the slasher-kings rest. They were very much a product of the 80's and like most things from that decade they don't translate all that well in our hip ultra-cynical ADD addled society today. The continuous failure to introduce a new franchise killer is evidence of that.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 13, 2010 1:00 PM

I'm perfectly fine watching foreign horror films until North America eventually pulls its severed head out of its plundered rectum. Admittedly, I've never been a big fan of the serial horror films and do prefer the atmospheric horror. Mind you, according to some, Barack Obama is your new horror hero.

Posted by: admin at May 13, 2010 1:04 PM

I'm currently writing a screenplay about a maniacle (see also: maniacal) and unstoppable ice-cream man who returns from a lengthy coma to take revenge on a group of misfit tweens (now, about to graduate high school) who robbed his truck and left him for dead 5 years earlier. Obviously, his skull was cracked in the assault and he has been fitted with a metal plate in his head, which he mutilates by screwing upside-down ice cream cones into (they'll look like spikes). He hunts them down one by one, singing "I scream, you scream, you'll all scream for ice cream."

I'm calling it, "Cold as Ice. Cream." Here is an excerpt:

Timmy: C'mon Jessie, we're about to graduate. Next year we'll be at different colleges and you don't want to lose it to some frat guy.
Jessica: We might not have the chance to lose it at all.
Timmy: (sigh) This again? I told you, my dad ruled out the possiblity that Ted, Veronica and Alfonso were murdered. It's just been a series of tragic accidents.
Jessica: You don't really believe that do you?!
Timmy: Of course I do. Why would my dad keep secrets from me? He's the town sheriff, after all.
Jessica: I just can't believe that an ice-cream headache could make someone's head explode!
Timmy: It's science, Jessie.
Jessica: B-but...
Timmy: It's SCIENCE. Anyway, if you're right -- if we are going to die -- don't you wanna...
Jessica: Wait! Do you hear that?
Timmy: Hear what?
Jessica: That sound. It sounds like (gasp) an ice cream truck.
*cut to a dark street. an ominous dirty-white ice cream truck drives up the road slowly while the chilling ice-cream-truck song rings dimly*
*inside the truck we see a disgusting mouth with rotton teeth slowly licking a popsicle and grinning like the devil*

I'm currently raising funds to complete this project. Please go to icecreamheadachewillmakeyourbrainexplode.com and donate. There's a paypal button.

Posted by: superasente at May 13, 2010 1:26 PM

I'm bored today so I did some digging.

Dead Silence was supposed to be sequilized but only made $22M in theaters (it cost $20M) so the sequel never materialized. Too bad, because that was a decent movie with some really creepy visuals and set design. Nothing earth shattering, but FAR better than the Platinum Dunes output on all levels. And it starred Ryan Kwanten from True Blood so it's worth seeing for fans there.

What surprised me was Darkness Falls. I always thought that was a total dud but it cost $11M and made near $50M. The movie is flawed but the premise is good (you are only safe in the light) and I would have liked to see a sequel fix the problems of the movie. Namely, there was not nearly enough of the pretty damn cool looking monster.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 13, 2010 1:27 PM

How about Lord Voldemort? Another genre entirely, but still that noseless face is pretty damn creepy. And he's certainly murderous...

Posted by: mswas at May 13, 2010 1:33 PM

I take that back. Darkness Falls made just over $80M domestic + international. That's a bit mind blowing for that movie to be honest. Blame the maths.

Posted by: TylerDFC at May 13, 2010 1:34 PM

Heigl. Hahaha. But seriously what if she became immortal and never went away!!!!

Posted by: peanut at May 13, 2010 1:41 PM

superasente:

Ice Cream Man

With Clint Howard, of course!

Posted by: MM at May 13, 2010 1:51 PM

Well, I guess the idea of the boogeyman is that is personifies some unnamed dread or whatever we all experience, or some social ill or whatnot. Since 9/11, it seems like there are plenty of real things to be afraid of (on either side of the political aisle, by the way). minimizing the effectiveness of the bogeyman as a scapegoat for our subconscious fears, etc. etc. So, I think that plays a part.

Bernie Madoff maybe?

That said, they still haven't locked up Charlie Sheen yet, so does he count?

Posted by: jason at May 13, 2010 2:17 PM

(sigh)...motherfuckers...

Posted by: superasente at May 13, 2010 2:24 PM

Don't be discouraged, supersente, there's always room for another ice cream horror film. I can think of three without much effort, which includes an episode of Masters of Horror. You can always make it about an candy vendor at a HS (subcontracted through the school's cafeteria) that the students rob. That would make it totally different and allow for some interesting commentary on the unhealthy school lunch dialog happening. And by commentary, I mean a bag of Pop Rocks shoved up a jock's asshole chased by a soda pop enema. Fun for the whole family!

Posted by: Robert at May 13, 2010 2:29 PM

Prof. Gilpin from my World Politics class. It was a long time ago, but I still shudder when I see a balding man in a camel striped coat, chinos and blue loafers.

Posted by: SB at May 13, 2010 2:43 PM

I thought this generation's boogeyman was Dick Cheney.

Posted by: Craig at May 13, 2010 8:25 PM

Here's a theory. I thought about it after reading the "Films That Were Better than the Books" list. The allure of Bogeymen, is that, like Tyler Durden, they are essentially anti-heroes. Actually, they are actually super-evil-anti-heroes squared.

Maybe in this era of real world terrorist/banker/black President bogeymen (Which are mostly actually as fictional as Freddy Kruger) most people, the ones that love Michael Bay movies, just don't want to romanticize the bad guys anymore. I, however, am not one of those people.

The The Bogeyman has given way to the Psychopath heroes of today. Guys on the "right" side of the law. Which is why I can't really get into "Dexter" he is just Jack Bauer for criminals.

Posted by: Darth Darko at May 13, 2010 9:05 PM

People always give me crap for this. But I give the movie Jeepers Creepers credit for being the only serious attempt at creating a new horror supervillain. And it was so good for the first 2 acts. They totally screwed up with a lame third act (wings? Really?!). He coulda been a contender.

Posted by: Marco Rogers at May 14, 2010 2:03 AM

A couple more trips to Silent Hill to visit with Pyramid Head would do the trick.
Now that fucker is scary.

Posted by: East Coast Ugly at May 14, 2010 8:05 AM

Just so I can dust off an aging, though still valid case that in a Post-9/11 USA: fear of the supernatural, otherworldly, or vengeful has been replaced by more realistic horrors. People do want to see us dead, and they are trying. Terrorists have supplanted the undying serial killer simply because they truly seem to be undying in their numbers, and their body counts are real. That came out more callous than I intended. Sorry.
Ahem. Starting over.
In this age of Tea parties and fear of government, I have my own idea for a new horror film killer: The G-man. A faceless (in every sense of the word) bureaucrat who finds his victims in some government database. He terrorizes them with various government intrusions/hassles/what-have-you, as he gets closer to killing all that the hero loves. And when the hero gets close to killing the G-man, he transfers to another bureaucracy, to start again in the sequels.
Now where is my money?

Posted by: W.E.Coyote at May 14, 2010 2:04 PM

People aren't scary anymore. I think we've well passed the point where a guy in a mask is scary when everyone has a gun or a knife. Aliens and things we don't understand are what we're still afraid of. I'm personally afraid of the demon from Paranormal Activity and still can't sleep sometimes when i think of him.

Posted by: Jordan at May 15, 2010 4:24 AM

Have you seen the movie "The Collector" if this movie got the marketing it deserved it could be labeled as a "boogeyman" for this generation, the problem is that no one has heard about it. I'm not going to give it away as to what the movie is about. But for all those out there, I would like your opinion on what you think of that movie, as far as it being a boogeyman movie and if it was marketed correctly it could have had that new generation boogeyman feel to it.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0844479/

Posted by: christopher at May 15, 2010 10:24 AM

@superasente:

tl;dr

Posted by: Bowie High School, Arlington, Texas at May 16, 2010 5:06 AM

The only thing scary about movies is the new double-digit pricetag to see them in the theater, IMO - scary movies just aren't scary, really - relying on the watchers' stupidity more than anything to leverage any fear at all.

Posted by: movie at May 16, 2010 1:22 PM

Hey Brian Prisco you stole my article. I posted almost the same article over at bloodydisgusting.com well over ayear ago..

Posted by: Adam at May 19, 2010 11:31 PM

I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.I think you have done an excellent job with your blog. I will return in the near future.I had bookmark it :)

Posted by: Cheap fashion dresses at January 5, 2011 9:41 PM

Nice shout out to Leslie Vernon. I'm still holding out for a sequel to that one. And "Hatchet" was pretty bad. Some decent kills but the humor was forced and it wasn't scary at all. I think it's time to let the slasher-kings rest. They were very much a product of the 80's and like most things from that decade they don't translate all that well in our hip ultra-cynical ADD addled society today. The continuous failure to introduce a new franchise killer is evidence of that.

Posted by: bleach cosplay at March 4, 2011 2:08 AM