![]()
Psycho Goblin. Qu'est-ce que c'est?
The Spiderwick Chronicles / Phillip Stephens
Of all the recent cinematic conversions of children’s fantasy, The Spiderwick Chronicles stood the greatest chance of success. Holly Black and Tony DiTerlizzi’s five bite-size books, all magic and exigencies, could easily be crammed into one film, skirting the expositional problems of The Golden Compass via a smaller story and tighter focus. And give Nickelodeon credit, because they got the basics right; the film isn’t quite stupendous, but it doesn’t have anything out of place. This is a good flick which should thrill younglings rather than belittle them, while not alienating the adults in tow.
The Grace family has just moved from urban New York to suburban Somewhere. Helen (Mary-Louise Parker) has just separated from Papa Grace and is relocating, with three kids to her Aunt’s abandoned manse. Mallory (Sarah Bolger), the take-charge older sister, and bookish Simon (Freddie Highmore) are supportive, taking events in stride, while Jared (Highmore part deux) resents both the separation from his father and the relocation. Jared is purportedly a reckless kid, quick to anger and obstinacy, but Highmore never quite relays the energy of a defiant pre-teen; his rage is too muted, perhaps in part because his effort to hide an English accent renders his speech a bit stilted. He’s much more at home playing Simon, the quiet, less emotional twin. Still, if his performance isn’t zealous, Highmore at least lacks the self-consciousness bedeviling actors twice his age; he’s perfectly serviceable in two roles, as are Bolger and Parker, who seems to have made a niche for herself as a wearied mother (and is hot).
Jared, amid spells of combativeness, stumbles onto some of the house’s bizarre secrets — a hidden attic contains a book: “Arthur Spiderwick’s Field Guide to the Fantastical World Around You” which gives scientific descriptions of fairies, goblins, and a host of magical doodads that just might explain the rather crazy shit that’s been happening around the house. Though Thimbletack (voice of Martin Short), the hyperactive brownie charged with guarding the book, warns Jared, he opens the book and sets off a calamitous chain of events.
A wrathful ogre named Mulgarath (sometimes played, sometimes voiced, by Nick Nolte), will evidently stop at nothing to pilfer the book’s secrets, and so sets off a horde of goblins to attack the house and its inhabitants. The fantastical creatures are one of the strongest elements in Spiderwick; these aren’t just cartoons to be laughed at or knocked aside, these are genuinely dangerous things that bite and scratch and draw actual blood. Come to that, there’s actually a surprising amount of violence in the film, both toward critters and humans. To boot, they’re rendered well by computer imagery, using realistic modes (most of the creatures look reptilian, if nothing else) as opposed to the far-fetched. The violence may surprise younger viewers, but it gives a nice immediacy to the plot, and I’m of the opinion that when a film is more likely to scare the kiddies, it’s less likely to patronize them.
There’s plenty of urgency in The Spiderwick Chronicles to give the movie an engaging clip, and the story’s absence of “high” fantasy should keep the uninitiated from being bored. The human subtext — Jared’s embittered relationship with an absent father — is never more than predictable, but it still works in context. Like I said, this is a film which works well with low-expectations and doesn’t wreck higher ones. Even the suckers who aren’t twitterpated by magical intrigue like myself should find this a grand diversion.
Phillip Stephens is the lead critic and book editor for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR, and is a sucker for children’s lit.
Pajiba Love 02/15/08 | | Jumper
Comments
Oh oh oh OHHHHH AY Yi yi yi yi ... sorry. But you just made my Friday.
Posted by: that bees chick at February 15, 2008 12:19 PM
Given that the books are written for the average third-grader, I can't say I'm surprised by this review. Not much substance, but not much heinousness, either. Sounds like it's best to wait for it to hit the dollar theater.
Posted by: Wednesday at February 15, 2008 12:32 PM
I almost drifted away at the mere mention of Martin Short, but then, Nick Nolte? In a children's film? This I have to see.
Posted by: PaddyDog at February 15, 2008 12:33 PM
I've been curious about Pajiba's take on this one since the review in our local paper was favorable, but concerned that it was a bit too scary for little kids. My daughter's been begging me to see this; it'll be interesting to see if she winds up in my lap, a la the firebombing scenes in Howl's Moving Castle.
Posted by: pinkcheese at February 15, 2008 12:33 PM
Martin Short plays a hyperactive brownie? Hmmm....did I read that correctly?
Posted by: Brie at February 15, 2008 12:39 PM
After being thrilled with Lemony Snickett's and then being disappointed with the Golden Compass...I was reluctant but hopeful about Spiderwick. Never read any of the books, which I consider a good thing at this point, as I can judge the movie without being predisposed (although I already expect them to be good). I'm glad you liked it...it makes me feel much better about looking forward to watching a "children's" movie. Now if only I can find someone to drag to the theatre to see it with me...I probably don't want to seem like that creepy guy who goes to children's movies by himself....
Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 15, 2008 12:46 PM
"...house's bizarre secrets -- a hidden antic contains a book..."
I believe that should be attic. Although I am up for hidden tomfoolery and shenanigans.
Brie, you mean Martin Short isn't a hyperactive brownie? This changes everything.
Posted by: ScarletKnight at February 15, 2008 12:51 PM
Shadows, just don't bring a bag of Gummy Bears and a burlap sack to the theater, you should be pretty inconspicuous that way.
I'm actually intrigued by Spiderwick now...it for some unknown reason reminds me of the glory that is Labyrinth.
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 12:57 PM
MMM...Talking Heads
Review Excellent, Me ambivalent
Posted by: Kevin Longrie at February 15, 2008 12:59 PM
That means I have to leave my lucky chloroform and rope at home, doesn't it?
Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 15, 2008 1:03 PM
Hee...save it for the ladies, Shadows.
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 1:05 PM
ScarletKnight, when I think of hyperactive brownies, I think of bud (pot) brownies. And that's a whole different movie, isn't it?
Posted by: Brie at February 15, 2008 1:15 PM
loves me the talking heads reference. That song particularly rings special for me. {:twich:}
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 1:16 PM
I met a talking animated brownie in college once...
It was the last one left in the pan - the other eight I consumed were rather... leafy?
Anyhow, he and I talked about the existence of unicorns and pixies for about a half-hour before I got hungry and ate him too...
Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at February 15, 2008 1:17 PM
Shadows I swear you and I shop at the same store; Rusty's Rope and Chloroform-porium. It's the one on route 9, right next to Big Lots. They're having a 2 for one sale on rubber gloves and carbonic cleaning fluids this weekend! :)
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 1:25 PM
PissBoy and Shadows, Pajiba's very own version of Bianchi and Buono. :)
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 1:31 PM
Talking Heads!!!!!!
Now to read the review
Bapaba Bapaba Bapabababa
Posted by: Brian at February 15, 2008 1:34 PM
I am Buono all the way. I could never, in good conscience, willingly go by the first name Kenneth.
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 1:38 PM
I don't know, Brie. There are goblins and ogres running around that no one else can see without a special ring, and that is after they have "read" the book. You remember those acid-laced stickers that kids were supposed be getting? Yeah, they made this book first. Now if you'll excuse, I need to stare at the clouds and wonder why in the hell they are bleeding on me.
Posted by: ScarletKnight at February 15, 2008 1:54 PM
And now, I shall only address you as such...Kenny has a lovely ring to it.
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 1:55 PM
Hey, PissBoy, I thought I saw you there the other day when I was picking up my drum of lye...
But I look so much like an Angelo...damnit...
Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 15, 2008 1:59 PM
So, a review of a chaildren's movie has devolved into a converstaion about which Hillside Strangler a frequent commentor is more like. And they say this movie site is different than the others.
Movie sounds ok. How are the books?
Posted by: Brian at February 15, 2008 3:04 PM
fa fa fa fa fa fa fa faaaa fa
Posted by: fa fa fa fa at February 15, 2008 3:09 PM
Julie started it.
And that's pretty tame for these kinds of discussions...TK hasn't even made it here yet.
I am curious about the books, though. I forgot that I had read the Lemony Snickett's ones, and didn't like the book over the movie. Weren't the Spiderwick books written about the same time?
Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 15, 2008 3:12 PM
I never claimed to be like one of the Hillside Stranglers, but if I had to be one, I will NOT be named Kenneth. That's just as bad as being named Guy. Not to mention, when someone says their name is Ken, what are first images conjured? A plastic doll with no junk and an aging country singer who's starting to look like Joan Rivers with a chin-strap beard.
Thank you. I will be Angelo. At the very worst people would think you were doing a (bad) Tony Danza impersonation from Who's the Boss as he attempts to say "Angela." So what? Images of Judith Light pop into your head, which, aside from the bad acne, I'm strangly OK with.
My logic here is flawless.
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 3:13 PM
*strangely
Was that a freudian slip or something?
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 3:14 PM
So I got it wrong - its fa fa fa fa fa fa fa faaaa fa?
Posted by: Brian at February 15, 2008 3:14 PM
Yes Brian, tis a collection of "fa's."
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 3:17 PM
Brian- fa fa fa faaa fa fa fa fa faaa fa
Shall we declare Talking Heads the band of Pajiba? It'd make sense, really. I don't think I've seen this many identifying comments on a song-based title.
Posted by: Kt at February 15, 2008 3:17 PM
I'll go check the lyrics - which album is it from again?
Posted by: Brian at February 15, 2008 3:17 PM
77
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 3:20 PM
Found em' - you're right
http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Psycho-Killer-lyrics-Talking-Heads/75C1380DB2E05502482568B0002BF821
Posted by: Brian at February 15, 2008 3:20 PM
"I'm strangly OK with"
"Was that a freudian slip or something?"
HA HA HA! That's either the best typo ever, PissBoy, or someone has garroting on the brain. :)
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 3:21 PM
doesn't everyone Julie?
Posted by: Brian at February 15, 2008 3:23 PM
"and an aging country singer who's starting to look like Joan Rivers with a chin-strap beard."
And chicken. Don't forget the chicken.
Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 15, 2008 3:24 PM
It certainly seems that way, but my friends are a little suspect.
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 3:25 PM
I love this site.
Posted by: pinkcheese at February 15, 2008 3:33 PM
hijacked?
Posted by: PissBoy at February 15, 2008 3:45 PM
I've never read The Spiderwick Chronicles, but I have read Holly Black's YA urban fantasy trilogy, which is, for lack of a better phrase, TOTALLY BALLIN'. Seriously, I will see this movie on the strength of a completely different book series, that is how awesome I find Holly Black.
Posted by: Smithy at February 15, 2008 3:47 PM
Lemony Snicket beats the pants off Spiderwick. Spiderwick's writing is very, very young. If you're over the age of nine or ten, you're not going to be impressed by the books. They have no staying power, either. It's a read 'em and forget 'em type of deal.
This isn't a Harry Potter or a Series of Unfortunate Events. There's NOTHING in this series to grab an adult...no audience crossover. They're not bad books, per se, they're just very targeted to the age group. (And how do I know this? I read them all aloud to my daughter, who was outgrowing them by the time the series finished.)
Posted by: Wednesday at February 15, 2008 3:54 PM
"There's NOTHING in this series to grab an adult...no audience crossover. They're not bad books, per se, they're just very targeted to the age group. "
Well, maybe it's best they were turned into movies, then...because that's what I thought of Series of Unfortunate Events. Granted, I only read the first three books. I liked the storyline, and the world they were describing, but the writing was just too juvenile to hold my attention for long. At least now, in movie form, I'll get the best of all worlds...the fantastic stories in a medium that'll keep my attention.
Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 15, 2008 3:58 PM
These do sound like fun books to read aloud to kids, Wednesday, hopefully your daughter's next batch of novels will be more conducive to adults. :)
Although knowing me I'd find a way to enjoy them for myself, seeing as The Monster at the End of This Book still enthralls me.
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 4:00 PM
Okay... children's books, talking pot-brownies, and serial strangulation?
I don't want to sound like a total puss here, but wouldn't this be something that Homeland Security might be checking out? Isn't there some magical combination of words or phrasing that warrants a SWAT crew kicking in a door somewhere? Shouldn't there be a... hold on...
I thought I heard a helicop... nevermind.
Anyhow, bottom line is - should I be throwing a tarp over the MurderTank? Or at least get the bone fragments and hair clumps off the spiked bumper(s)?
I'm gonna go ahead and lock my doors and stick any forms of identification up my butt. Isn't that the standard protocol for an emergency...? I should probably have a drink first to loosen up...
Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at February 15, 2008 4:11 PM
I don't want to sound like a total puss here, but wouldn't this be something that Homeland Security might be checking out?
Dudue, what the hell!!!? They already siezed this site's hard drives once. Just shut up
Posted by: Brian at February 15, 2008 4:20 PM
Skittimus....I don't think there's enough drink in the world to loosen up enough to stick hard, plastic cards up your butt. Kinda reminds me of Beerfest...
And...I don't know what you're talking about. I was never here. I have no knowledge of what's in my bathtub...
I'm just discussing with other like minds a great kid's movie that I want to watch in a dark theatre by myself...without a trenchcoat in which various items can be hidden...
Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 15, 2008 4:21 PM
Yay, It's good! I loved those books and how they were just quick bitty bites of an epic tale. I'll have to see this one, and I won't mind paying more just to see it in IMAX.
Posted by: Kamakaze Feminist at February 15, 2008 4:22 PM
*hands Skittimus a brillo pad and some lube*
And yes, the brillo pad is for the cleaning.
Posted by: Julie at February 15, 2008 4:31 PM
Wait, wait, wait. Just a moment. They're twins? I totally did not get that from the movie trailer, which admittedly I only saw once, as a preview on either the xXx or the Mortal Kombat DVD I picked up the other day. Weird.
Also, Talking Heads, yay, even if I do have that damn song in my head now.
Posted by: Cuno at February 15, 2008 6:16 PM
I actually quite enjoyed the books, despite them being very young, and myself being almost of drinking age (just nine more months...gah). The illustrations are great, and Holly Black is an excellent story teller. I blew through them in about four hours, and they were very enjoyable. I'm glad the movie didn't destroy them.
Also, the turn this comment section took is hilarious. Again, I am reminded why I go here for reviews, and am filled with hatred of the imdb forums.
Posted by: kalexal at February 16, 2008 4:27 PM
The love for Holly Black is strong in this one. I simply love the part in Tithe where Kay is watching the sun set by the ocean and says that it looks like the sun slit his wrists and the moon is just watching him die. She must have driven him to it.
True the Spiderwick series was juvenile, but it was meant to be. The books are tiny and have pictures for goodness sakes, what did you honestly expect? The movie was great though. T
The "everything goes right in the end, and we mean everything!" ending was a little bit of a turn off, but the graphics were wonderful.
P.S.: And no I didn't get my nickname from the book Tithe my name actually starts with the letter K.
Posted by: Kay at February 17, 2008 8:13 PM
Right, sorry about the odd breaks and errors in that. Pressed "post" and not "preview".
Posted by: Kay at February 17, 2008 8:14 PM
So I caught the movie tonight and it was AMAZING. I mean, it's not going to win any awards any time soon, but it was fun, and kept me absorbed for the entire time.
Posted by: KatyBelle at February 18, 2008 2:17 AM
Why I didn't like this movie:
Fairy: "If you take the book out of the magic circle, you'll all die!"
Girl: "What does that mean?"
Anyone that stupid deserves to get eaten by a troll. This would have been a much better movie if the kids had shown even a modicum of intelligence, or had at least read Lord of the Rings.
Posted by: Steve at February 18, 2008 10:26 AM
I read the series because of the artist involved. A beautiful companion book goes with it, right up there with Froud's Faeries. Now all the have to do is FINALLY get Raymond Feist's Faerie Tale of the ground after 20 years.
Posted by: bookslut at February 19, 2008 11:35 AM
The thing I am most surprised about in this review is that you completely failed to mention the divorce subtext in the movie that isn't nearly as strong in the books. I just saw it last night and really enjoyed it, especially how much Fairyland looked like something G.K. Chesterton or George McDonald would have written.
**Spoiler Alert**
I was struck, as I'm sure many people were, by what the screenwriters were saying about divorce. I was shocked at the sense of vengeance in the scene where Jared stabs his father, or what could be his father. I've only read parts of the books so kudos to whoever it was that decided it was forgivable for a man to abandon his child for A Cause (i.e. Spiderwick) but not for another woman (i.e. Mr. Grace). From a kid's point of view nothing could be truer. I read a review of this that was really taken aback and alarmed by the symbolism of the final confrontation scene but I couldn't disagree more. I know of at least two children of divorce that used to have homicidal thoughts toward their parents or step-parents. I applaud whoever wrote a movie recognizing this reality.
Posted by: Ronald McJohnald at February 24, 2008 4:27 PM
I wonder if anyone is still reading this thread and can let me know if they saw this movie and if it was too scary for a 5 year old? I do also have an 8 year old, and it sounds like it's right up her alley.
However, if I leave the 5 year old at home alone, she eats all my chocolate - so I'd have to bring her along.
Posted by: mswas at February 26, 2008 10:28 PM
mswas: leave the 5 year old at home, bring your chocolate stash with you. The movie will be much more enjoyable.
Posted by: Kris at March 4, 2008 2:37 AM
it did rock n
o
t
Posted by: andreh at May 27, 2008 6:18 PM

