Pajiba's Privacy Policy



dwayne__the_rock__johnson1.jpg

When People Run in Circles /
It's a Very, Very Mad World

Southland Tales / John Williams

Writer-director Richard Kelly doesn’t make plot summary easy, so let’s take a deep breath at the top here and get this out of the way:

In the world of Southland Tales, Kelly’s second feature, nuclear bombs were set off throughout Texas on July 4, 2005. Three years later, chaos reigns — World War III is being fought on several fronts, the U.S. has run out of time to develop alternative fuel sources, the nightly news is rife with domestic car bombings, the government requires Interstate Travel Visas, and a presidential election looms — but life in California proceeds apace, with surfers on the waves, frat boys in the bars, and left-wingers plotting their hapless revolutions. An underground neo-Marxist group based in Venice Beach seeks to disrupt the election and cripple USIDent, an Orwellian surveillance agency created in the wake of the attacks. A major actor who supports the Republican Party wakes up in the desert with a case of amnesia, and a cop recently back from a tour of duty in Iraq grapples with the fact that he injured a good friend with friendly fire. Oh, and that good friend, now disfigured, guards an alternative-fuel source from a rotating offshore turret. And the alternative-fuel source, which harnesses tidal power, was discovered by a mad scientist who looks like a transsexual Wallace Shawn (played, appropriately, by Shawn) and is continually surrounded by a coterie of creepy old women and one remarkably underdressed Asian vamp.

In short, this is dystopia as joyride, and plot is both everything and nothing. Kelly has said that he wanted Southland Tales to be “like a big piece of pop art.” Well, he nailed the pop part. The cast is a perverse amalgam of Hollywood wannabes, has-beens, and never-weres: Justin Timberlake, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Seann William Scott, Dwayne (“The Rock”) Johnson, Christopher Lambert, Mandy Moore, John Larroquette, and a perplexing bevy of mostly fossilized “Saturday Night Live” veterans — Amy Poehler, Nora Dunn, Cheri Oteri, and Jon Lovitz. (I wanted to add a drum roll for emphasis before one of those last two names, but choosing between them caused a small but noticeable seizure, not unlike their performances.) Miranda Richardson and Shawn are on board, possibly to anchor their fellow actors and keep them from floating into deep space, but it’s a tough chore made tougher by obstacles like the silver space suit that revoltingly accentuates Shawn’s paunch throughout. This movie’s antonym is “dignified.”

That’s not to say it lacks kicks. Kelly gets points for populating a carnivalesque story set in a futuristic Los Angeles with a sideshow’s worth of real-life pop-culture freaks turned into even poppier fictional freaks. He’s also said the movie was inspired by the work of Thomas Pynchon, and, at least in the naming of characters, the inspiration took. How are these for Pynchonesque handles? Baron Von Westphalen, Pilot Abilene, Boxer Santaros, and Krysta Now.

Gellar plays Krysta, a former porn star branching out into reality television, a perfume line, a power drink, and music (her hit single is “Teen Horniness is Not a Crime”). Johnson is Santaros, the movie star sans memory, a muscular mountain who nervously taps his fingers together at the first sign of trouble (a choice of tic that’s annoying the second time around, maddening the fifteenth). These two propel much of the action, but Kelly is tripped up time and again by what some might praise as “the level of his ambition,” but what I prefer to call “his absolute lack of storytelling ability.”

There are several ways to make a movie that’s sure to attract a cult, and Kelly seems determined to build a career by checking them off one by one. Two surefire models are the cryptic movie that takes itself very seriously and the wild spectacle that doesn’t take itself seriously at all. Kelly’s debut, Donnie Darko, was decidedly the former, a satiric-but -mostly-spooky koan about time travel and a troubled teenager’s destiny, still picked over by fanatical interpreters who flock to midnight screenings. Southland Tales, one hopes while sitting through it, is an example of the latter formula — like Rocky Horror or Hedwig, a movie that will live on because groups of people wish to assemble and shout along with the occasional, spirited musical numbers, the good jokes, and the so-bad- they’re-good jokes.

There are some genuinely big laughs in Southland Tales, including a TV advertisement that features two SUVs getting to know each other Biblically, and Krysta’s bubble-headed observance, prominent in the movie’s marketing campaign, that “Scientists are saying the future is going to be far more futuristic then they originally predicted.” But many other lines are funny only if the movie is laughing at itself. For instance: “The fourth dimension will collapse on itself….you stupid bitch.” Or this line, perhaps the perfect reflection of the dominant tone: “Who are you going to believe, a Nobel Prize-winning scientist or a two-bit porn star?”

Astoundingly, though, there’s evidence that Kelly sees his latest creation as something more earnest. In interviews, he has spoken about the energy crisis, the sincerity of his characters despite their eccentricities (as opposed to their being campy), and how he likes to believe that T.S. Eliot’s famous line about the world ending “not with a bang but a whimper” (which Southland reverses) represents the poet “having a premonition about global warming.” Such strong (if boilerplate) political concerns and poetic misreadings are married, in Kelly’s vision, with a climax involving a giant zeppelin, a floating ice cream truck, and more silliness about time travel and possible religious overtones. It can be dangerous or pointless to worry too much about an artist’s intentions, but it seems crucial here. If Kelly intended this as a consciously hammy fantasia with a dash of cultural and spiritual commentary, he’s made a pretty bad movie that nonetheless provides some fun. If he thinks this is a trenchant indictment masquerading as a lark, he’s made a terrible movie and almost all the laughs are on him.

Reviewing Pynchon’s most recent novel, Against the Day, in the New
York Times
, Michiko Kakutani described it as “a humongous, bloated jigsaw puzzle of a story, pretentious without being provocative, elliptical without being illuminating, complicated without being rewardingly complex … Dozens of characters are sent on mysterious (often half-baked) quests that intersect mysteriously with the mysterious quests of people they knew in another context, and dozens of portentous plot lines are portentously twined around even more portentous events…”

Kelly has lived up to his literary influences more than he may have wished.

John Williams lives in Brooklyn. He’s a freelance writer. He blogs at A Special Way of Being Afraid.


Love In The Time Of Cholera | | Pajiba Love 11/19/07



Comments

The lead actress is an airhead porn-star trying to get people to take her seriously, the dialogue is wooden and trite, there are a number of bad sing-a-long numbers, and there's a stable of actors of normally high caliber inexplicably cast in this movie that wants to be a cult film.

Are you sure you didn't accidentally review Repo!: The Genetic Opera?

Posted by: insertclevernamehere at November 19, 2007 2:44 PM

Tell you what, I'll just pop in Escape From New York, Blade Runner, Road Warrior and V for Vendetta; have some friends over play the Pajiba drinking game and get good and hammered and just skip this shit.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 19, 2007 3:04 PM

"This movie's antonym is "dignified.""

Well. That's my favorite review line of the year.

Man, I love me some Donnie Darko, but you could almost sense that if he didn't try to tone it down for his second effort, Kelly was gonna break off the track. Sounds like that's what he did.

But you know what? I still wanna see it.

Posted by: TK at November 19, 2007 3:08 PM

I had a lot of hope for this movie. Mostly because unlike a lot of people who complained about the terrible casting, I realized that nobody picks a cast like that without some higher ironic purpose...I think... Which means that even though I'll probably be waiting for netflix on this one, I'll be viewing it as "campy and laughing at itself" in order to receive any possible enjoyment, with absolutely no regard for how Kelly actually wants me to see it. Cause that's just how I roll.

Posted by: McGeek at November 19, 2007 3:15 PM

Holding out for Hitman review.

I'm gettin' that itch that only R rated bloodshed can scratch.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 19, 2007 3:20 PM

I'm crashing BSlim's party.

Can I sneak in with my copy of "True Romance" and a bottle of vodka?

I'll catch "Southland Tales" on DVD, the same way I did "Donnie Darko". Kelly's a hometown guy; gotta support the RVA.

Posted by: Alabamapink at November 19, 2007 3:25 PM

anyone read the graphic novels that preceded? i was engrossed and grossed out simultaneously. i've never been on the edge of my seat with my eyes rolling before. i can't wait to see this.

Posted by: vinniedelpino at November 19, 2007 3:42 PM

Can I sneak in with my copy of "True Romance" and a bottle of vodka?

-------------------------------------------------

Ha! Is the Pope the Catholic?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 19, 2007 4:03 PM

Man, I've got finals coming up, and the movie theater in my section of Miami is also in the same mall as the "Cheeseburger in Paradise" that has a six hour two for one "happy hour". Sounds like a fun afternoon to me.

I really have to give respect to anyone who tries to do something different with movies. Honestly, I don't want to see a re-tread of some cheap, unlikely romance story with hackneyed dialogue again. Even if this fails, at least it's not more of the same kind of failure.

Posted by: Rusty at November 19, 2007 5:13 PM

I saw it at 10:30am on Friday in a Philly suburban theater with a few others. Two walked out (unclear why...the movie had just started). I liked the movie a lot but I'm extremely weird. I agree with a lot of what you said John but you didn't mention, what I felt, was the best part. The soundtrack was freaking amazing! Oh and Justin Timberlake lipsyncing The Killers in what can only be described as the scarest drug trip I ever want to see (and I've seen LSD Man in Wonderwall) was nice too...

Posted by: Luke at November 19, 2007 5:46 PM

Sounds like crap.

Great review.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at November 19, 2007 6:48 PM

Sounds horrible, but I want to see it anyway. I think I may have a problem.

Posted by: the_wakeful at November 19, 2007 11:02 PM

Shucks. I've been waiting for this... I can't say that I love Donnie Darko, but I sure find it intriguing and engaging, albeit sometimes irritating and kinda smug. It hinted at two things for me - either future greatness for Kelly or total head-up-his-own-arse-ness. Seems the latter took place. Might he be the new Michael Cimino? I fear that he might.
That said (and in tune with a few other commenters) - I still want to see Southland Tales. Call me curious but don't call me George.

Posted by: Toothed Varmint at November 20, 2007 3:21 AM

I also will probably go and see this, despite its apparent lameness. I mean, to see Christopher's Lambert's innate awesomeness on the *big* screen is something that cannot be passed up.

Posted by: Craig at November 20, 2007 3:39 AM

Why the hell is the Captivity ad back up on this site? This one is even bigger than the last...

Posted by: Jon at November 20, 2007 3:43 AM

I'm not seeing the Captivity ad, I am however seeing the gay-parship.co.uk advert which is brightening my day.

I did enjoy Donnie Darko but after watching the Director's Cut with commentary I realised my enjoyment was mainly due to my own interpretation and so didn't hold out much hope for this particular venture.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at November 20, 2007 6:55 AM

Even if this fails, at least it's not more of the same kind of failure.

Motto.

Posted by: twig at November 20, 2007 10:55 AM

Yup, this is definitely a BYOB movie.

Posted by: Kris at November 20, 2007 4:45 PM

I saw this, this shit's hilarious. A train wreck, to be sure, but I found it one of the most entertaining train wrecks I've ever seen. I can see how a lot of people are going to hate it - the story's really all over the place, and the characters are more cartoons than flesh-and-blood people. But still, the movie is not without its charms, and shortly after the orgy of exposition that was the intro (like the ship at the beginning of Spaceballs, only in voiceover), I was totally sucked in.

Everyone at the theater I was in left at the end saying "What the hell did I just see?", but they were saying it with a smile on their face.

Posted by: Ericeric at November 21, 2007 8:58 AM

Sorry Folks to disagree but I loved it and I laughed thru most of it. The theater was empty except for a few other couples. My wife was lost and thought it slow and stupid. I asked a gentleman in line as we were leaving and he agreed with me and admitted his girlfriend was of my wife's opinion. Perhaps this is a work of art?

Posted by: Rogerrrrr at November 27, 2007 12:05 PM



Post a comment