web
counter
 

You Can Ask But Should They Tell? Do We Care If Our Movie Stars Are Gay?

By Cindy Davis | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (59)



johnt.jpg

People, there’s a lot of crap out on the interwebs and I probably read too much of it. But, even the goofiest rumors can lead to serious thought, which in turn can prompt a Seriously Random List and perhaps some interesting discourse over what we want from our movie stars. Do we really care if they are gay, straight, bisexual, married or single? Me, I couldn’t care less. An actor’s sex appeal might have bearing on whether or not I buy a ticket, but his sexual preference certainly does not. Should an actor feel the need to hide? At this point, plenty of people in Hollywood have come out and their careers continue to thrive. But what about the ones who are known for their “macho” or “movie star” leading roles—do the same rules apply? Would a gay Brad Pitt have the same box office appeal? What if our action stars have wives in name only or their significant others are a public cover; would it matter?

According to the gossip world (and Ricky Gervais), these actors are the top most speculated over; rumored to be gay or bisexual:


brcooper.jpg

jake-gyllenhaal-1.jpg

Jada-PinkettWill-Smith.jpg

Thumbnail image for travoltapreston.jpg

tom-cruise-katie-holmes1.jpg

Cruise has made a profession of playing “manly” men like Maverick in Top Gun, Mission Impossible’s Ethan Hunt and Ron Kovic in Born on the 4th of July. Travolta’s career has afforded him more diversity and he hasn’t seemed afraid of playing up different sides of his personality, with roles from Edna Turnblad in Hairspray to Face/Off’s Sean Archer, a dancing Tony Manero and a greaser who prances and sings. Smith seems to be interested in serious or earnest everyman roles, with a little bit of action star on the side. The two younger actors, Bradley Cooper and Jake Gyllenhaal, have been setting up their leading men careers, perhaps in the hopes of being the next Tom Cruise or John Travolta. Each has been building up to starring roles, with Gyllenhaal poised to take on the Bourne series if he gets the chance and Cooper being groomed in the public eye as the next swoon-worthy leading man.

Some think these men could never be the stars that they are if they were openly gay. If the rumors are to be believed, Hollywood still thinks we won’t accept a gay action star or a homosexual starring in a romantic, heterosexual role. But wouldn’t successfully playing such a part make someone an even better actor? After all, Tom Hanks and Sean Penn have both won Academy Awards for their roles as homosexual men, surely the accolades will flow in the opposite direction?

There are still so many ignorant people out there, even in the acting community itself. To wit, here is former “SNL”er, Victoria Jackson, waving her bible and expounding over the offensiveness of a recent kiss between two boys on “Glee”:

In these times, when so many young people are struggling for the right to be who they are without fear, wouldn’t it would be glorious and inspiring for a macho action star to come out? Or am I being naive; would you be less likely to buy a ticket to see the next film in the Bourne or James Bond series if the actor playing the lead was gay?









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



You Look Like You Get Off On Murdering Puppies and Breaking Hearts. Is That What You Were Going For? | Pajiba After Dark 3/22/11









Comments

or James Bond series if the actor playing the lead was gay?

Just what are you implying?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at March 22, 2011 5:05 PM

Do we really care if they are gay, straight, bisexual, married or single?
If they are hot lesbians hell yeah

Posted by: Yesplease at March 22, 2011 5:09 PM

No, I don't care. Never did, really. In fact, it's one of the farthest things from my mind when I see a movie.

Caligula had a lesbian scene between two Penthouse models; it made no matter to me if they were straight and merely acting or not.

Posted by: The Wanderer at March 22, 2011 5:15 PM

you forgot Hugh Jackman!
honestly when you see Matt Boomer(White Collar),he says he's gay and goes to the award show with his partner and the women always are crazy on him

Posted by: carrie at March 22, 2011 5:17 PM

I don't think we should care what an actor's sexual orientation is. If they are a good actor they should be able to make us believe in the character they are playing, so matter if they themselves OR their character like men women or both.

Case and point, Neil Patrick Harris playing Barney Stinson. Despite being gay in real life, his character is still a pretty believable womanizer (albeit incredibly corny) and plenty of people still watch it and don't care about his preference in the real world, jah?)

Posted by: Lisa at March 22, 2011 5:21 PM

"wouldn’t it be glorious and inspiring for a macho action star to come out?"

I've been back and forth on this issue a million billion times in my head and I ultimately come down to the side of, "It would be glorious and inspiring, but it's no one star's responsibility to do it." I'm glad to be out, but I wouldn't want to be out if I were famous.

"would you be less likely to buy a ticket to see the next film in the Bourne or James Bond series if the actor playing the lead was gay?"

I wouldn't be less likely to buy a ticket, but I honestly think my parents would.

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at March 22, 2011 5:24 PM

Jesus Christ indeed, Victoria.

She really needs her own slot on Fox News. She'd fit right in.

Posted by: Paultera at March 22, 2011 5:25 PM

I don't think we should care, but a lot of people obviously do.

Posted by: Todd at March 22, 2011 5:27 PM

Neil Patrick Harris makes me swoon in straight roles.

John Barrowman makes me moist when Cap't. Jack snogs Spike.

Shit, I don't care.

Posted by: BWeaves at March 22, 2011 5:27 PM

Why do our gay action stars have to be manly? If we're going to go gay we should just go for it. Picture this; a flambouyant queen prancing through the woods in a kinky unicorn costume, angrily humming "Cabaret" as he blinds waves of minions with ninja-glitter just before he shoots a rocket launcher into the villainous despot's island lair. It would be equal parts fabulous and bad-ass. It would be Fadassublous!

Posted by: superasente at March 22, 2011 5:33 PM

Wow. That is an amazingly bad photo of Tom Cruise. Wow.

Hugh Jackman is definitely on the list. I find it a little suspicious that 3 of these 5 are Scientologists, which makes me thing the rumors might be targeted as ways to annoy/damage them.

Though it wouldn't make a difference to me (Rupert Everett was so delicious before he messed up his face), I'm not Bible belt. And I can certainly imagine women being turned off by gay male heartthrobs. I'm not saying it's right, but man-man sex is generally considered "ickier" than lesbian sex.

Btw, re: Victoria Jackson and others...don't confuse "ignorant" with "bigoted."

Posted by: Sara Tonin at March 22, 2011 5:41 PM

Who cares? Not me - do what you like in your personal life but be a good actor.

The video is hilarious - how many times can they show the Glee gay kiss in a large window and the lady against it in a small window next to it? I can't understand that a gay kiss is a big deal on TV anymore - but I guess that says more about me than about the world.

Posted by: TS at March 22, 2011 5:42 PM

I get why some stars stay in the closet. However,the "closet" is no longer a luxury anyone can afford. Visibility (At any price.The movement comes before a person's family,life, safety,and career.)and strength in numbers is the only way we'll win the Culture War.
Besides,being in the closet is unhealthy. Outing people is for their own good.

Posted by: CaseCrum at March 22, 2011 5:45 PM

If feel like we're all missing the important question here, which is: what in the sam hill does that bigot lady have in her hair?

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at March 22, 2011 5:46 PM

Meh *shrugs*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 22, 2011 5:53 PM

Those guys aren't gay! The Scientology aliens cured them.

Posted by: logan at March 22, 2011 5:56 PM

is cruise sporting a bieber haircut in hopes we won't notice he is pushing 50?

@superasente, wasn't that basketball player sort of flaming flamboyant in Double Team, with van damme (who come to think of it, is a bit of a femme fatale too)?

Posted by: idleprimate at March 22, 2011 6:02 PM

Not really. It's not like anything else about the movies are real, why does the character's sexual orientation have to match that of the person portraying him/her?

I don't believe most of what Tom Cruise does in "Mission Impossible," for example, so whether I think he actually enjoys macking on hot girls in those movies doesn't make a goddam bit of difference to me.

Also, I think a lot of the gay speculation has queered (pun intended) people's perceptions. Cruise and Travolta could be straighter than the edge of a ruler, but many people won't believe it now, because the gay rumors are just too prevalent.

Posted by: Slash at March 22, 2011 6:09 PM

you ever notice people only speculate about sex symbol movie stars? no one ever wonders about the sexual orientation of steve buscemi, seth rogen, or paul giametti? as absurd as it sounds, it's probably legitimate, from a box-office point of view to be discreet.

Posted by: idleprimate at March 22, 2011 6:16 PM

I don't give a shit about gay or not gay, but for the love of God, put up a new post and get that abominable header picture off the top of the page!!

Posted by: MM at March 22, 2011 6:20 PM

Nope, I don't care. I don't judge actors based on their orientation; I judge based on whether they can act.

Boy, Victoria's baby-voice shtick gets mighty old when it's spewing hate.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at March 22, 2011 6:22 PM

Don't care. Maybe it makes them swoon worthier (I'm also in the love NPH and John Barrowman camp). They're actors, if being gay or straight means they can't act gay or straight, they're in the wrong industry. It shouldn't matter (and to me it doesn't) but it might be a few more years no one cares.

Posted by: leuce7 at March 22, 2011 6:23 PM

I'm w/ BWeaves on Barrowman. He's one of my family's favorites. One hell of an actor I don't care that he's gay.

Same w/ NPH. Love his work. Don't give two wet farts about his sexuality.

Once upon a time it was something to keep under covers (Rock Hudson), but honestly...I don't care.

It's not illegal. Let them live their private lives as they see fit.

I'll judge an actor on his work, thank you.

Posted by: Uncle JR at March 22, 2011 6:39 PM

Must be human nature.
We just want to know other peoples business.
Personally, I don't care, but I may be in the minority.

Posted by: OldSchool60 at March 22, 2011 6:41 PM

@idleprimate- I speculate about Steve Buschemi, all the time, its just that no one gives a shit about what I say.

Sometimes reading the other comments feels like sitting right in the middle of the choir, listening to Pajabian preach, but here goes: I think we should know, but just so that we can then give these people Oscars for roles in which they have act as thought they fall in love with the opposite sex.

I really wish people didn't care. Someday we'll find it, the rainbow connection... the lovers the dreamers and me.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at March 22, 2011 6:56 PM

Of course we care! It's a big fucking deal to see yourself writ large in our culture's holy myths. Every denial, every silence, that MEANS something, and what it means is that queers aren't good enough.

Well fuck that, I am going to continue with my prurient fascination until people take some fucking responsibility. In an ideal world I would only care about Cooper because he was great in WHAS and Kitchen Confidential. When Hollywood steps away from its vile, hypocritical cowardice, then we don't have to care.

Posted by: nigeltde at March 22, 2011 7:08 PM

I don't think anyone's sexuality is anyone's business but their own, but I don't want people who live to a certain extent in the public eye to lie in order to further their career, as it makes homosexuality seem shameful. Sham marriages are a disgrace to everyone.

Posted by: Caspar at March 22, 2011 7:13 PM

I read an article on the Daily Beast where the author, an out gay man, hounded Kevin Spacey to reveal his orientation. The author outs him and asked him why he won't come out of the closet and support his people. Mr. Spacey had a great response:

Look, at the end of the day people have to respect people's differences. I am different than some people would like me to be. I just don't buy into that the personal can be political. I just think that's horseshit. No one's personal life is in the public interest. It's gossip, bottom line. End of story.

Posted by: Jennifer at March 22, 2011 7:42 PM

Kevin Spacey wants it to be one way. But it's the other way.

Look, no-one cares if he's a fan of the reverse cowgirl, but same-sex attraction IS a political subject position. In this world right now, it just is. People get killed for it. People get disowned for it. People's families are changed because of it.

It's wrong to out someone. But I think it's untenable to argue that, if you're famous, people could only be interested in your sexuality for reasons of gossip.

Posted by: nigeltde at March 22, 2011 7:52 PM

I don't give a toss about Brad Pitt. Never have, never will. As for the others... meh. What I want to see is a multi-million dollar action flick with the hero falling for another guy. That would be fantastic. Get onto that Hollywood Studios!!

Posted by: Captain T at March 22, 2011 8:03 PM

Gay, straight, bisexual, married or single...

Who cares?

Isn't it enough to hate them all just because they are douchebag Scientologists and/or PeTArds?

Posted by: I.J. Reilly at March 22, 2011 8:05 PM

No Jackman or Spacey? I call shenanigans.

But seriously, I don't care. Rupert Everett was quite swoon-worthy back in the day, and I might have actually uttered the following: Enh. I totally didn't buy him as gay in My Best Friend's Wedding.

Posted by: Samantha at March 22, 2011 8:19 PM

...and that was probably because I saw him first in Cemetery Man. Anyone else seen that? Hoo, boy.

Posted by: Samantha at March 22, 2011 8:20 PM

I didn't know who that top guy was. What has Bradley Cooper been in?

Posted by: Snuggiepants at March 22, 2011 8:25 PM

I nominate NPH to be the next James Bond. Swoon.

Also, Victoria Jackson makes me sad and I wish I hadn't just wasted 2 minutes of my life listening to her talk.

Back to hot gay men - if Hugh Jackman can be Wolverine and Rupert Evertt can lead romantic comedies, then I say being a good actor means you don't have to be straight to act straight.

Posted by: Cabbage at March 22, 2011 8:47 PM

I don't care if an actor is gay.

I only care if I'm wasting my money at the box office or time in front of the TV.

Posted by: John W at March 22, 2011 9:29 PM

Three comments in one thread might be my Pajiba record, but I feel the need to pipe up because of one thing that I feel always gets forgotten wherever this debate pops up: bisexuality EXISTS. I'm attracted to men and women, and I'm currently in a heterosexual relationship. Acquaintances, people who know me through work, distant family friends, etc. probably mostly assume that I'm straight. These guy's marriages might not be any more of a sham than mine is (and trust, I'm very much in love. I even forgave him for calling Miller's Crossing a bad movie).

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at March 22, 2011 9:49 PM

I agree with Captain T

Too many people still think that gay men are all flaming queens, because Hollywood is only ever showing that side of male homosexuality. There is nothing strange about a tough, strong action-hero type man being gay, and I would love it if an action movie portrayed a gay male lead who just happened to come home to his husband instead of his wife. That would indicate real progress.

Posted by: John G. at March 22, 2011 10:54 PM

I also get annoyed with the gay = "not manly" association. What you do with your dirty bits does not have a direct correlation with how you handle drill bits.

I would also like to offer Tom Hardy as evidence of someone who has basically taken the "what the fuckever, who cares?" stance on his personal sexual history. He has said he is not gay, but he has talked about his sexual experiences with men, and his "manly" roles seem to be stacking up... a trend I hope continues. mmm pillow lips.

I don't mind the actors that choose to just not say anything, but I agree that the constant denials by those that are (if they are) creates the impression that it is something to be ashamed of.

Posted by: SuiteT at March 22, 2011 11:16 PM

Cemetery Man = AWESOME

Posted by: HappyGobo at March 22, 2011 11:49 PM

I keep thinking of Kathy Griffin, who ragged on Tom Cruise in one of her standup specials a few years ago. She said, "You know how you can tell you're no longer hot? When the gays don't want you anymore. Uh-uh. It's all about Gyllenhaal now." I do wonder if some of the speculation about the sexuality of certain male stars is just wishful thinking on the part of people who need it to be true, whether for fantasy fulfillment or because it'd make good fodder for the gossip rags.

I take a somewhat removed interest in the personal lives of my favorites, simply because a little interest is natural, but too much interest makes it hard for me to set aside their true persons and focus on the characters they're trying to create. I love NPH and Spacey, but don't think I could watch either one of them if I were to wonder, every time one of them kisses a female actor in a scene, "Oooh, is he thinking 'ewww' while he does that?" I also love Colin Firth, and found him wholly believable as a gay man in A Single Man, but had to suppress the memory of seeing him paw his wife on the red carpet at sundry premieres in order to fully enjoy his performance.

I can't remember who said it, but someone said after Brokeback Mountain was hailed as a breakthrough for homosexuals and homosexuality in the movies, "True progress will have been achieved when an out gay actor can play an out gay man in the movies and no-one blinks an eye." Agreed. When a gay man or lesbian can play a gay or lesbian in a film or onstage, and his/her performance includes a love scene, and the only comments are about the quality of the performance and not how doing so must have been easy and no great shakes, then we'll have moved forward.

Posted by: PDamian at March 23, 2011 1:11 AM

I prefer to know as little as possible about an actor, because the more I know, the more it distracts me from their performance. My favourite actors (Paul Giamatti, Maggie Smith, Gary Oldman, Imelda Staunton, Amy Ryan) disappear into their roles, which enables me to become absorbed in the story, oblivious to the fact that I'm sitting in a darkened hall amongst a hundred complete strangers or lying on my couch in my knickers. There are certain actors (Woody Allen, Julia Roberts, Jack Nicholson, Gwyneth Paltrow) whom I simply can't watch, because their celebrity overwhelms their portrayal.

Gay/straight - who gives a f*ck? Just make me believe the story.

Posted by: Xiufetish at March 23, 2011 5:30 AM

I don't really care about celebrities' love/sex/private lives. If I admire an actor, artist or author I tend to hope they're happy and fulfilled, simply because I wish them well.
Having said that, celeb gossip has become an industry in and of itself and I wish people outed themselves more - simply to level the playing field (albeit to the lowest denominator).
That way the headline "Oooh, blonde biscuit de jour is trolloping about with her very married leading man" would equal "Wow, gay TV series hottie is cheating on his live-in bf" instead of "TV series hottie is GAY (shock, horror, squeals)".
If that makes any sense.

Posted by: cinekat at March 23, 2011 5:33 AM

Case and point, Neil Patrick Harris playing Barney Stinson. Despite being gay in real life, his character is still a pretty believable womanizer (albeit incredibly corny) and plenty of people still watch it and don't care about his preference in the real world, jah?)

I used to work with a guy who loved Barney and had absolutely no idea that NPH was gay. His girlfriend told me not to ever mention it around him, otherwise he'd never watch another episode of HIMYM. Apparently he wasn't the only one either. So there are still bigots out there who have no idea and would turn on him in an instant.

Those guys aren't gay! The Scientology aliens cured them.

The Scientology aliens are what make people gay. LRH's tech is what cures them.

Posted by: Uda at March 23, 2011 6:04 AM

I don't think people care as much as you think. NPH and Ian Mckellen are two of the most out and popular actors around and no one bats an eye when they play straight. It's sad that this is even an issue and I'm hopeful one day this whole homosexual phobic thing we have going on will be looked back on as archaic and shameful much as "Separate but equal" is to us today.

Posted by: TylerDFC at March 23, 2011 7:42 AM

Even mroe to the point I will draw from one of the greatest movies of all time, "True Romance":

You're an actor, ACT, motherfucker!

Posted by: TylerDFC at March 23, 2011 7:46 AM

I do recall Rupert Everett commenting on how coming out "ruined" his career by excluding him from portraying the leading man and relegating him to supporting roles.

That said, the only thing I can reckon about Kevin Spacey vehemently rebuffing claims of homosexuality is his desire to maintain casting freedom. I've always thought of Spacey as an actor's actor, so I was shocked to read that he'd taken offense to such claims. As a former Acteurre myself, I know it takes a sexually secure man to play the game. Any straight dude that's gonna have a hissy over his sexuality being questioned needs to get of the mfing pot, bc, like tears and baseball, there's simply no homophobia on the stage.

Of course I recognize that film is an entirely different monster, but I do believe it is one where the topic of sexuality and gender are constantly being broached, making a certain degree of ambiguity necessary to secure commercial acceptance. Deep down, I think most people really just want to be gay; how else can you justify any heterosexual female/male choosing Bieber's decidedly masculine soccer mom hairdo, or Megan Fox's anti-child-birthing boy hips?

One final thought:

Can we just not with the crazy blue-eyed emu? Sure I made the mistake of seeing Limitless, but maybe I was on a date, and maybe I thought it served the bastard right to loose some cash over such an awful choice. All I know is that there is a definite line where a person's eyes can be too blue, and it was reached up the butt and out the wang in that film. I can never unsee the terror that is Cooper's massive bird-face.

Posted by: beet salad at March 23, 2011 9:25 AM

Also:

Can I get A Matthew Broderick up in this piece?

Posted by: beet salad at March 23, 2011 9:36 AM

I have a major problem with two things..

1. Gyllenhall as Bourne. Gay or not he'd stink up the screen

2. Victoria Jackson and her stupid, whiny, Betty Boop voice saying homosexuals have no right to exist. I'm straight and I'd rather watch a boatload of gays fucking their brains out than see her bloated, bigoted, bible-thumping puss on my tv screen. SNL what were you THINKING????

Posted by: kirbyjay at March 23, 2011 10:19 AM

Bradley Cooper really does look like an emu. Not sure if that's cute or scary.

Rumors of Jeremy Renner being of the other persuasion abound. Does that make me want to still shag him? No. But I'd still pay big bucks to watch him read the phone book and get the girl. He's an actor!!

Posted by: kirbyjay at March 23, 2011 10:25 AM

The first words out of Victoria Jackson's mouth were "It doesn't matter what I think..." To true, victoria. Too true.

Posted by: Mike D at March 23, 2011 11:23 AM

I will admit curiosity, but it doesn't affect my viewing. My curiosity stems more from wanting to know who plays for my team because the B in the LGBT acronym is often the most ignored.

So thanks Cindy for saying "rumored to be gay or bisexual" and not just "gay."

*hat tip*

Posted by: Sara H at March 23, 2011 2:15 PM

Other persuasion? What in the hot fuck is that?

And most of the Renner rumors are attributable to the fact that one of his first roles out of the gate was freaking Jeffrey Dahmer. Kind of difficult to play off that kind of first impression.

Straight, gay, whatever, emu is emu. Reminds me of nothing so much as Dan Futterman's "after" on Will & Grace.

Posted by: Jerry at March 23, 2011 8:25 PM

I think Matthew Broderick has been perceived as a gay man due to his theater origins as well as being in the movie "Torch Song Trilogy" He is not a macho guy at all. Perhaps he is bisexual but I don't buy that he is gay. He crossed boundaries long before "Brokeback Mountain" was ever made. He made choices to disregard public opinion and career risks by appearing in Torch Song as a teenager when it wasn't fashionable to be associated with gays. He took it the next step when he played the role of Arnold's lover in the movie version of Torch Song, after his success in mainstream movies like Ferris, War Games and Biloxi Blues. No one gives this guy props for that. They make fun of him because his wife is a bigger "star". Matthew is a star among stars.
Also, two years ago, he received an award from the Human Rights Campaign recognizing his support of gays as a straight person and has continually lent his support for same sex marriages.
Matthew is my hero.

Posted by: danny at March 23, 2011 10:18 PM

I dont think anyone should just have to admit their sexuality to the public, as it IS their right to decide if or when to share it.

But I do believe that in an age when children kill themselves because they're gay, to not be open about being gay or bisexual can be...how can I put it...there's no way to word it that wouldn't be offensive but I just wish the actors people basically KNOW are gay would admit it if only to send the message to kids that it's okay. A swedish footballer recently came out and made a big point of saying his sexuality doesn't affect his playing. I wouldn't think any less of these men (or some women) if they came out because it doesn't make a flying fuck of a difference to their ability to act.
It makes me sad they're so scared to be who they are that even when the whole world is saying 'dude, we know, it's cool',, they still hide away.

Posted by: Nadine at March 24, 2011 5:20 AM

Yes if we're homophobes, no if we aren't.

Posted by: Robin at March 24, 2011 10:55 PM

Oh Come oN!
It's Pajiba and the world does not revolve around this website (sadly). There's a whole intolerant world out there. Things have NOT changed that much.

Posted by: James at March 25, 2011 10:56 PM

I just read an interview with Portia De Rossi where she talks about coming out. She said that first she came out to her family, but didn't discuss it with the press, she just lived her life openly. She eventually came to the realization that when people assume a star is gay and they don't publicly admit it, it seems like being gay is something to be ashamed of. So, she went on the record.

As did Victoria Jackson, and now UHF is ruined for me. I hope Weird Al isn't a homophobe, too.

Posted by: Robyn Robotron at March 27, 2011 7:52 AM

I'm shocked Zachary Quinto wasn't up there, but he's basically out anyway, he just hasn't made it official.

@Captain T: I agree so hard! I'm waiting impatiently for that to finally happen. I mean, so many action/adventure franchises have the "bromance" or whatever, how hard would it be to take out the "b" every once in a while? It angers me when I see a male/male friendship that would DEFINITELY be a romance if one of the characters was female, but there's such a double standard. I'm not saying every male/male friendship has to be romantic, but I'm getting tired of these armored closets.


Also: thank you so much for mentioning Tom Hardy, SuiteT.

Posted by: Alwyn at March 27, 2011 7:46 PM