twilight_movie_image_group_shotd.jpg
The Five Most Obnoxious Literary Fads

A Seriously Random List XXVI / Dustin Rowles

Seriously Random Lists | November 20, 2008 | Comments (210)


HarryPotterL_468x456.jpg5. Harry Potter, by J.K. Rowling. I, like almost every other person in human existence, have read the entire Harry Potter series. And I, like almost every other person in human existence, enjoyed the Harry Potter series. But the level of obsession, the waves wrought by the series, and the overall Pottermania that invaded our culture was unwarranted for a series of largely repetitive books that were no better or worse than your average kid’s fantasy literature. It would’ve been one thing if the Potter books actually encouraged overall reading in adolescents, but unfortunately, that love of reading never actually extended past the Harry Potter books. And at a certain level, the only reason so many kids were reading Harry Potter was because of the social pressure to do so. It was a literary fad that, for some children, made reading a goddamn chore. Harry Potter’s saving grace: It was a fun series to read.

bridgetjonesdiary.jpg4. Bridget Jones, by Helen Fielding. This is another series of books that I actually did read and was somewhat amused by. However, the tenuous association to Pride and Prejudice notwithstanding, the Bridget Jones series is also largely responsible for the growth of the chick-lit industry, and there is nothing redeeming about that, unless you like female stereotypes, an illiberal view of singledom, and the harsh view the Bridget Jones series had on unmarried, career women: They’re funny and zany, but ultimately, sad-sack losers in search of happiness only a man can bring. Bitch, please.

svh1-03.jpg3. Sweet Valley High. I was both too young and not a teenage girl to appreciate — or rather, loathe — the Sweet Valley High series, which began in 1983 and spawned 150 books written by various authors. But I’m pretty sure that if I were of age, I would’ve hated Sweet Valley High and all the tweenagers obsessed with them. Weren’t they about skinny high school girls who always got the prom king or something? I officially despise them based on principle alone.

DaVinciCodeHanks_special.jpg2. Da Vinci Code. God, what a terrible book. Soft-boiled Jesus pulp, horribly written mass-market pablum swallowed up by huge swaths of America, many of whom considered it serious literature and mistook it, to some degree, as fact. Worse still, this trifle — this silly little book — actually created enough controversy to piss off the Church. Hell, not only did the Da Vinci Code inspire a copycat industry of religious fakery disguised as mystery, it spawned another genre of books written to refute The Da Vinci Code. Also, for — like, a year — you couldn’t walk in a bookstore without bumping into one of these goddamn books. Hell. Tom Hank’s hairstyle in the movie is reason enough to detest The Da Vinci Code and its sequel, Angels and Demons.

twilightdadsfads.jpg1. Twilight. In high school, I was into the gothy, bookwork chicks — the kind that’d you’d find huddled in a corner of the cafeteria reading (these women, unfortunately, were more myth than reality. But, I loved the idea of them). But there’s a new, weird strain of that tween-age girl that irks me to no end, the one in the college hoodie with her nose stuck in a Twilight book during dinner with her family at Applebees. I haven’t read any of the Twilight books (though, I’ve read enough reviews on this site to get the gist), but these fake suburban goth tweens annoy the hell out of me, and I can’t help but feel that the Twilight books are grooming teenage girls into sexually-frustrated middle-aged women. And you know what? I like vampires. I like werewolves. And I hate to see them used as vehicles for a tweeny, soft-core romance. Come the fuck on: A vegetarian vampire? And Isabella Swan. Give me a break.If you’re gonna have a vampire love story, let’s at least see some vampire double-backing.


Arrested Development Movie | Do You Like to Watch?





Comments

I think Tom Hanks' hair is fixed in Angels & Demons, thankfully. Doesn't mean I'm going to see it, but at least it's something.

Speaking of new goths and vampires, South Park last night was pretty hilarious. I love those South Park goth kids.

Posted by: Snath at November 20, 2008 3:08 PM

How I know The Da Vinci Code,/i> sucked:

Halfway through reading it, I dropped it in a toilet full of my own pee. I remained unconcerned.

Posted by: courtney 2 at November 20, 2008 3:10 PM

How can you be a vegetarian vampire? Doesn't drinking blood, even animal blood, not make you a vegetarian?

Also, vampires can't walk in daylight or have sex. Thems the rules. Just had to get that out of my system.

Posted by: me at November 20, 2008 3:10 PM

I was a huge fan of Sweet Valley, but never the "High" series. When I was in middle school they came out with updated Sweet Valley Senior Year. It was basically The OC before The OC and in book form. Just to give you a taste: the troubled bad boy that Elizabeth (the brainy twin) is in love with lands in rehab. Classic. At least they only take a couple hours to read each.

Posted by: kelsy at November 20, 2008 3:15 PM

I had a friend who loved Sweet Valley High when we were kids. She was also the one who always made her Barbie marry Ken. What little girl wants her Barbie to marry Ken? Mine would always sarcastically rebuff all of his advances until she eventually gave in and danced with him to Vanessa Williams' "Save The Best For Last" at the prom.

Posted by: becks at November 20, 2008 3:15 PM

THANK YOU for acknowledging the inexcusable suck of Bridget Jones and the completely off-base attempt to claim it as a modern take on P&P. If one more idiot tries to tell me BJ is about an empowered young woman, I releasing TK's zombies without filling out the required forms.

My additions to the list would be:

"Sequels" to Pride and Prejudice and other Austen classics. ("Mr. Darcy Takes a Wife", "Jane CHurchill", "The Other Price Sister"). Stop it already. None of you can write like Austen. It's illegal to impose 21st century sex scenes on Austen's work. You all should have your keyboards confiscated permanently.

The Notebook and all of its offshoots (Suzann's diary for Nicholas, etc.). Need I add more?

The Mitford Series: there's nothing conceptually wrong with a series of books about the nicest vicar on earth living in the nicest town on earth populated by the nicest villagers on earth (if you like the genre of extreme sci-fi), but dammit, my husband's aunt gives me one of these books every Christmas and then expects to chat with me about "the plot" (vicar's wife solves lonely depressive widow's problems by baking her a cake is a plot my friends).

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 20, 2008 3:16 PM

"(these women, unfortunately, were more myth than reality. But, I loved the idea of them)"

Not true, Dustin. When I was in middle school, we were required to go out for recess. I used to find places indoors to hide so I could read and not have to interact with other human beings. This habit did not end when high school began, I promise you.

Also, there is almost not a single thing on this list I can argue with. I agree with the content, I agree with the rankings. The only thing you are missing is Nicholas Sparks. I think everyone around these here parts know how I feel about that walking, talking, writing buttfuck nugget. Godtopus damn him, I hate him. I hate him so much.

Posted by: dsbs at November 20, 2008 3:17 PM

Whatever happened to reading Juggs or Playboy?

Posted by: Pookie at November 20, 2008 3:19 PM

I love the Harry Potter series as well, but yes I do agree...the level of mania is a bit much. I enjoy them for literary merit, not because of a secret desire to be Harry Potter, if only to fulfill my ginger crush on Ginny Weasley and wield a kick assed wand.

The furthest I've gotten in my "obsession" is I want to reread the books, I've seen/have all the movies, and I have two Gryffindor scarves. (Pre and post Azkaban) And let's face it, nothing ruins a midnight rush to buy the goddamn books like some girl decked out in her Luna Lovegood attire because "it speaks to who she is".

Finally, might I submit the literary pap of Gregory Maguire (Wicked, et. al) as an annoying literary fad? Yeah, I get it, The Wicked Witch was misunderstood and she actually has a name. I'm still not reading your goddamn pussification of an actual classic. You are the Smallville of literature. GOOD DAY, SIR.

Posted by: Mike R. at November 20, 2008 3:20 PM

i loudly disagree with harry potter being here, especially the reasoning that kids read it b/c of social pressure. blah blah i'm sure other people will agree with me here. i'm too tired right now to even explain since just i'm waiting for the stinking news to tell me what i already know and that is that i'm about to be laid off because there will be no auto bailout.

everything else is correctamundo.

i'm gonna go read the harry potter books over a cup of ramen to cheer myself up.

Posted by: smiley at November 20, 2008 3:21 PM

I'd add the works of Mitch Albom to this list-trite schmaltzy manipulative bullshit.

I refuse to discuss Twilight. My self-loathing is such that I'm about to become a cutter.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 3:22 PM

Hey Smiley:

Hang in there. Some of us are rooting for you. Yeah I know mis-management blah blah blah, but it seems to me there's a horrific double standard when it somes to bailing out finance-based white collar jobs versus manufacturing jobs. Hope you make it through okay.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 20, 2008 3:24 PM

Let me guess... you watched South Park last night, right?

Posted by: Az at November 20, 2008 3:26 PM

Nice addition Julie. You probably shouldn't listen to my opinion though, I enjoyed the Notebook. I'd gone through a bad breakup. Don't judge me. Alright judge me, but don't hate me.

Posted by: becks at November 20, 2008 3:27 PM

Dude, we're close to the same age, and SVH was all the rage when I was in school. Of course, that may have to do with the state of funding of our school library.... Yeah, I read a bunch of them. Pretty trashy indeed.

Here's a sign of the times--in every single one of the books I read, the author went on about the twins' long blond hair, blue-green eyes, and "perfect size-six figures." I flipped through one recently in a bookstore (out of sheer curiousity), and it seems they're now whittled down to "perfect size-four figures." Good grief.

Amen to the DaVinci Code. Honestly, after hearing my friends' reviews, I was expecting a serious hard-core literary work, but it read like a cheap-ass throwaway novel. Don't know if I was more disappointed in the book or my friends.

Posted by: meaux at November 20, 2008 3:27 PM

You can only really read one Nicholas Sparks book, seeing as they all involve "boy meets girl, girl gets all self righteous and resists boy, girl gives into boy after boy becomes 'enlightened [in the pants]', boy loses girl to cancer/alzheimers/really really bad timing/general death"

So yeah...pick your one Nicholas Sparks book carefully.

Posted by: Mike R. at November 20, 2008 3:32 PM

Whoa there, "Wicked" is actually one of my favorite book. It adds a whole new layer of world to already well-explored world of OZ and that's a feat. The original OZ books, all 32 or so of them combined don't even have 1/5th of substance Wicked has.

That being said, the other Gregory Maguire books tends to be weak, yes. However, I would choose his books over most other because they are well-researched and often offer a pretty interesting point of views to oft-told tales.

Posted by: yocean at November 20, 2008 3:34 PM

But if you worked in a library or a bookstore you would've definitely included the Rich Schoolbitch genre.

A few years ago it was only Gossip Girl and The A-List and we were relatively safe.

But NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Hell, now The It Girl even has a goddamn spin-off series. Plus there's The Clique, and at least three others I'm forgetting. And yes, there's even Rich Vampire Schoolbitch books now.

Teenage girls.....you make me sad.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 3:35 PM

LALALALALA I can't hear you! [sob]

Posted by: Sarina at November 20, 2008 3:37 PM

I agree with Yocean that Wicked is a really good book. But then Maguire tried to build a genre of "alternative takes on classic fairy tales" and frankly I think he misses the mark more often than he hits it. Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister was interesting, but the Snow White rip-off really lost me. Haven't read the other two Wicked spin-offs.
P.S. don't judge the book if you've only seen the musical. Book is way better.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 20, 2008 3:40 PM

Awesome.

I have never any of these books in any of these series. Well, I read about the first 50 or so pages of both the first and last Harry Potter books, but that's about it. That's not enough to count.

Posted by: ajax19 at November 20, 2008 3:40 PM

What about the "Left Behind" series? I never understand the "I'm going to scare you to Jesus" tactic of trying to get people to church. The only people reading/caring about these books are Kirk Cameron and his crazy ass followers.

Posted by: wsapnin at November 20, 2008 3:41 PM

I never minded Bridget Jones so much, until I found out I was supposed to relate to her. She's a COMEDIC CHARACTER people, not something to strive for. Elizabeth Bennett would have eaten her for dinner.

Posted by: MarMar at November 20, 2008 3:46 PM

Oh, and I adore Harry Potter. Adore it. I love that little wizard. I was going through a terrible time when I read the first one, and to this day re-reading them provides me with so much comfort.

Plus, anything (including, sigh, Twilight), that gets kids reading makes me insanely happy.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 3:46 PM

I am the only human in existence that has not read the Harry Potter series, and it is a lonely existence wrought with constant verbal abuse from his most extreme fanboys/fangals.

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at November 20, 2008 3:48 PM

Hell, don't get me started on the dead father/son patronus stuff in "Azkaban", Julie.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 3:49 PM

Aw, Jay.

Mine was more of a "My family is being torn apart by an unexpected divorce and HEY that book is supposed to be fun escapism escapism WHEE!!" experience.

I may have to go home now and reread book three.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 3:53 PM

YOU SHALL NOT HARM HARRY POTTER! Dobby and I agree.

Having read a lot of children's classic literature, I have to say that Harry Potter beats the pants off most of them. I hate the Narnia Chronicals because stuff happens that doesn't tie together later, characters are introduced and then dropped like turkeys pretending to be bags of wet cement. Oh, the humanity.

I first came to Harry Potter right before book 4 was released. I told my young nephew that I wanted to read the first one, and that I'd buy it for him, and that he should read it and let me know if it was any good. If he liked it, he should give it to me to read, and then I'd buy him #2, and we'd keep swapping them out until #4 came out.

Well, he didn't read it and he didn't read it, and finally my sister yelled at him to sit down and read for 1/2 hour, and 2 hours later he was still reading. The kid read all four novels that summer. This was a kid who had barely read a Dr. Suess book in one sitting before.

He asked if he could have #5, and I said we'd have to wait until it came out in a couple of years. His jaw dropped. He'd have to wait. Well, he started reading all sorts of stuff after that. Gone with the Wind, Stephen King, all sorts of stuff.

Yeah, kids do like to read the same thing over and over, but they do eventually move on to other stuff, and in my opinion any reading is good reading.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 20, 2008 3:53 PM

I totally agreed with the Twilight reviews around here. My roommate really likes the books (kind of legitimately, even though she admits they're terribly written) and I was curious, so I read the first one and there's something really weird about them. Because you know they're terrible books, but you can't stop reading them.

Oh, and I'm going to the midnight showing tonight. IT WAS MY ROOMMATE'S DOING, I SWEAR. Ugh... I just lost all my credibility, didn't I? ::sigh::

Posted by: whatBENwatches at November 20, 2008 3:55 PM

Meh. People like what they can relate to...in their real lives or in an escapist way.
Unfortunately, there are a lot of teenage girls who can relate to an awkward, pathetic girl who has a crush on a beautiful boy.
These girls then grow up to relate to the fat, single, whiny chick who would rather write in her journal than face the fact that she should grow up and get a life.

Posted by: VeinsRHiways at November 20, 2008 3:55 PM

Because....I'll go ahead and start myself...if you're still young, or kinda young, there's probably going to be a few moments of "FUCK! Dad used to save me here".

Bono said "I'm in you. Moreso when they put me in the ground". And then you do save yourself.

Even in the shortened form of the movie, if you know what she's talking about it's massive.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 3:56 PM

Do you know what I used to read when I was a stupid kid? Babysitter's Club books. All of 'em. All of the time. If I had any today, I might read one, just for giggles.

It always annoyed me how they dedicated chapter to regurgitating how the Club came to be in existence...such a waste of space, and the same damned thing in EVERY book. Oh, how I wanted to be Claudia, and have my own phone in my room...

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 3:56 PM

What little girl wants her Barbie to marry Ken? Mine would always sarcastically rebuff all of his advances until she eventually gave in and danced with him to Vanessa Williams' "Save The Best For Last" at the prom.

becks, my Ken usually dumped Barbie for Skipper. And then Barbie would wear something really hot to the prom in order to win him back. Or something like that. Skipper was a total slut, though.

I was disturbed as a child.

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 3:57 PM

It always said that BJ was fat but she was like 130 lbs in the novel wasn't she? I'm not that much thinner.

Posted by: becks at November 20, 2008 4:00 PM

Heehee, kalafraja, Babysitters Club was the other series of my childhood. Ahh, memories! I was more of a Mary Anne fan (had to look up the names).

Agent Provocatrice, you are not alone. I've seen all the Harry Potter movies so far, but haven't touched the books, even though my husband has them all and has recommended them highly.

Posted by: meaux at November 20, 2008 4:03 PM

Wsapnin:

I concur. Only reason I didn't list the Left Behind series was that even with the broadest definition of "literature", I'm still not sure it qualifies. It'll be #1 on my list when we do the top five most annoying pieces of shameless propoganda.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 20, 2008 4:04 PM

Very nice lizzie. You could've played Barbies with me anyday.

Posted by: becks at November 20, 2008 4:05 PM

I remember these girls in first grade would play Barbies, and they'd act out a little soap opera with them. I was asked to play Ken in their little game, and I can't even remember what I did, however if I could teach my 1st grade self what I know now I would have turned the game on its ear and made Ken interrogate the Barbies as to who tried to kill the President.

Ah...youth.

Posted by: Mike R. at November 20, 2008 4:06 PM

Kalafraja, I loved the Babysitter's Club series with every fiber of my being. Mary Ann was always my favorite, because she was quiet and shy and I used to be both...with a big emphasis on used to be.

I read so much as a kid...Sweet Valley High, V.C. Andrews, Anne of Green Gables, Laura Ingalls Wilder, Beverly Cleary, Judy Blume, The Sideways Stories from Wayside School series, R.L. Stine, etc etc. I don't know how I had the time to read all that and also run my fake restaurant in my backyard. Heh.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 4:07 PM

Oh, meaux, Mary Anne? Strict dad? Not being allowed to date 'til she was 16? Though I suppose life loosened up when her dad remarried, and she got Dawn as a step-sister. In any case, I was much more of a fan of the free-wheelin' lifestyle of Claudia, or even Stacey...even though the diabetes DID probably slow her down somewhat.

I'm a loser.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:08 PM

What about goosebumps? My mom wouldn't allow them in the house so I would secretly check them out from the school library, read them under the covers, get scared shitless, and force my brother to go with me if I needed something from the basement. I am still scared of ventrilquist dummies (unless it's the jalapeƱo-on-a-stick guy), thanks R.L. Stine.

Posted by: CatherineB at November 20, 2008 4:08 PM

why isn't Lord of the Rings on the list? I mean, yeah Harry Potter spawned a lot of terrible clones ... but Lord of the Rings ... how many more bible fairy tales "disguised" as fantasy can one take?

Posted by: Le Kim Nguyen at November 20, 2008 4:10 PM

Oh dear lord, Julie, I hadn't thought of VC Andrews in years. I read every single one of those things, and I cannot believe that my mother let me.

I'm still haunted by some of the incestuous creepiness that went down in those things.

I have also read the Little House on the Prairie and Anne of Green Gables books at least 100 times each.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:10 PM

Can someone please review Flowers in the Attic for Cannonball Read? That's some high quality literature.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:13 PM

Hahaha kalafraja we ALL wanted to be Claudia. Every time she made an appearance there was an extended ode to what she was wearing, down to the last accessory, and it was always super trendy. I remember in one book she wore a sweatshirt upside down as pants and belted the top, and it was rhapsodized about, and I tried it and ended up looking like an oompa loompa. Kids are gullible.

Posted by: MG at November 20, 2008 4:13 PM

MG, she was just so damned crafty, making mundane things all funky and shiz.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:15 PM

Can someone please review Flowers in the Attic for Cannonball Read? That's some high quality literature.

HA! I took out the third book in that series yesterday with the sole purpose of reviewing it.

Because the Twilight series obviously wasn't enough to send me into a shame spiral, I have to read THAT crap.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 4:17 PM

I read so much as a kid...Sweet Valley High, V.C. Andrews, Anne of Green Gables, Laura Ingalls Wilder, Beverly Cleary, Judy Blume, The Sideways Stories from Wayside School series, R.L. Stine, etc etc.

Julie, you make me want to go hang out in the kids section at a book store and relive my childhood.

Posted by: Jeni at November 20, 2008 4:21 PM

Julie, what's the third one called? I'm sure I've read it...I just can't remember whether chick is still bangin' her bro at that point, or if their incest-baby is reading Lady Chatterly's Lover down in the boathouse or whatever while bangin' the pool boy who happens to be her uncle.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:21 PM

Really, although all of the above mentioned series are without a doubt goofy as hell at best and complete drivel at worst, I can't be dismayed too much about things like Harry Potter and Twilight. Anything that shows kids how badass reading a book can be is fine by me. Most of these kids will, of course, only read the trend books and never try anything else, which really isn't hurting anyone. And it's a good springboard for kids who might find out genuinely enjoy reading, and seek out more challenging fare.

I do have a couple trends I would like to add to this list, however: Stephen King books, Michael Chrichton books, Danielle Steele books, The Silence Of The Lambs books, and novelizations of films.

Posted by: Rob at November 20, 2008 4:21 PM

I don't know why my Barbies were so screwed up, but I had tons of fun with their little soap operas. I think Ken liked Skippers little boobies, too. I guess he liked a handful or something.

Good god.

Anyway. Jules, I read all those serieses too. Did anyone else read Christopher Pike? My mom tried to get me to stop reading them for a while because they scared the shit outta me. And it worked, for, like, two months.

I think I still have my old Babysitters and SVH/SVT somewhere in a box in storage. I think Stacey was my favorite. Which is kinda apropos as I am now a diabetic myself. *shrug*

Did anyone else read the Lurlene McDaniels books? The poor girls dying of heinous diseases who find luuuurve at the very last moment and then die happy (and virginal, of course)? Man, those books made me such a hypochondriac.

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 4:22 PM

Julie, were you raiding my childhood bookshelf?!!

Seriously, how weird is it for kids like us to have been reading V.C. Andrews? That was some messed up stuff.

Posted by: meaux at November 20, 2008 4:23 PM

lizzieborden, it's okay. If BSC taught you anything, it should be that diabetes won't ruin your life.

It may be that your parents well get up in your shit when you want to go-a-babysittin' on a cruise with a random pile of Pike kids, but that's manageable.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:24 PM

I read Christopher Pike too, Lizzie. But only after I started on R.L. Stine. When I was older, I graduated to Christopher Pike.

Posted by: Jeni at November 20, 2008 4:25 PM

Ha!

My Kens all got their left legs ripped off as soon as they came out of the box (my father's an amputee). Then Skipper, Gem, Barbie, and the GI Joe's would all gang up on Ken (my father used to be a right asshole, now, we're cool).

and Harry Potter sux. And no, I didn't read them. But I didn't have to. Let me guess:

1: oh, I am so lonely
2: oh, I am abandoned, but somehow managed to get into fancy private school.
3: oh, I am not so lonely anymore, now that I have other lame-ass friends
4: oh, magic, magic, magic.
5: oh, the end.'

what the fuck ever. Harry can kiss my ass and stick his wand up his. SVH is an improvement over that detritus.

ugh

Posted by: Estelle at November 20, 2008 4:26 PM

My grade school library had Flowers In The Attic.

I went to a Catholic grade school. Someone please explain how that happened?

OH, what about the Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark books?! I LOVED those.

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 4:27 PM

Julie, I read ALL of the books you just mentioned when I was young! I was a Mary Ann fan, too.

I didn't run a back-yard restaurant, though. I was too busy trying to get all the neighborhood kids to act in the plays that I wrote, directed, and starred in.

I actually just reread Anne of Green Gables last week, and it holds up so well. I'm not gonna lie - I cried when Matthew died. Again.

Posted by: MN_Jen at November 20, 2008 4:27 PM

Did anyone else read the new Nancy Drew books? I went through all the old ones quickly, and then started reading those modern ones that they churned out every few months.

The I got older and started reading Stephen King and then John Grisham and Michael Crichton, and then of course, the Anne Rice novels. Color me surprised when I read the Sleeping Beauty Chronicles a few years later...

Posted by: MG at November 20, 2008 4:27 PM

*Eee* lizzie, I loved Lurlene McDaniels! Oh, the drama....the beautiful, beautiful drama....

Posted by: meaux at November 20, 2008 4:28 PM

Never read Nancy Drew, MG. Trixie Belden was my girl-sleuth of choice.

Posted by: meaux at November 20, 2008 4:31 PM

Estelle, you break-a my heart.

Kalafraja, it's called If There Be Thorns.
:cackles, sobs: It's going to kill me.

Color me surprised when I read the Sleeping Beauty Chronicles a few years later...

Bondage and spankings and banging oh my.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 4:32 PM

I loved Nancy Drew, MG. I also loved the Bobbsey Twins. Dear GOD.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 4:34 PM

Stop being such a bunch of cunty snobs. I thought the DaVinci Code was a readable bit of pap, and it fucks me off when people put down others just because they dare to enjoy a book that's not considered literafuckingture. Get your heads out of your stinking rectal passages and just be happy that people are reading. Fucktoids.

Posted by: cuntyfucknuts at November 20, 2008 4:36 PM

Awesome list. While I cracked up at several bits in Bridget Jones, the hellspawn that's come after it has made me hate it a little.

The sequel was also a really cheap take on my favorite Austen book, "Persuasion", and it made me very angry at Fielding for being so blatantly unoriginal.

And oh man, I love mocking Twilight. I haven't read them, but have read more than one quote and I just think...WHY? HOW? *HOW*? and then I remember Da Vinci Code and realize people are just idiots.

Posted by: figgy at November 20, 2008 4:37 PM

HA! I have all of you beat when it comes to reading embarrassing book series:

ANIMORPHS That's right, bitches. Motherfuckin' Animorphs

I have no idea why they were so popular in my school. I have no idea why I thought they were so cool. But, I think I was also into that show Alex Mac soooo maybe I wanted to be a shape shifter.

What's weird is that I read tons of books as a kid. I read books walking to and from class. My third grade teacher's husband made fun of me for reading books while walking (something about tripping on my face). I think I called him out on wearing weird socks. I was a sassy 3rd grader. But I read some classy books like Little Women. I aced so many of those accelerated reader quizzes that got you gift certificates to the reading fair. That's right bitches, I owned the book fair.

Also, I have not read the Harry Potter books because of the weird cultish following around it. I thought at, first, it was cool that it might get kids to read other books, but sadly I realized most of the fans flat-out refused to read anything else.

I had quite a few Barbies, but only played with them when my friends wanted me to. But I always played with my Belle Barbie (yes, from Beauty & The Beast) and she was always casually aloof... But one friend would always make the guy go for Barbie because (according to her) boys only liked blondes.

This, subsequently, made my Belle become more of a Charlie's Angels-type of lady, always looking for burglars and some such.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 4:38 PM

Ah...Julie, good choice, but there's not nearly as much inappropriate sexing in that one.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:38 PM

The Babysitters Club could also be considered an old fad, when you think about how it led to a tv series and a movie, both just as awful as you'd think.

I loved SVH. Especially the crazy prom storyline where Jessica's bf Sam dies and that psycho tries to kill a twin and take over her life... yeah, I may have read too much as a tween.

Word on the Goosebumps and Christopher Pike books.

Posted by: Melissa at November 20, 2008 4:44 PM

See, I was worried about that, but the selection of old school Andrews was pretty slim. Maybe I'll keep checking back to see if they have a more disturbing one from my childhood.

Figgy, I liked Bridget Jones. I laughed out loud quite a bit at that book. Even at moments in the sequel (like the transcription of her Colin Firth interview). And I admit I read The DaVinci Code-it was crap, but it was a fun way to spend 3 hours. Meh. I'll read anything.

Which explains why I currently have the 2nd Stephenie Meyer book in my purse. LET HE WHO HAS NOT SINNED CAST THE FIRST STONE! And so forth.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 4:45 PM

i was so disgusted by the harry potter phenomena when it came out the i avoided the books like the plague. j.k. rowling rivals roald dahl, my ass! around the time the 4th book came out, noodle kidoodle was going out of business at the mall and had all the hard covers for like $5 a piece, so fuck it. i'll read 'em for that price.
wow
i was amazed with how well written these books are.
so when twilight came out i thought i would give it the same chance.
wrong!
horrible terrible juvenile trash
well, let me try the second book just to make sure.
yep, i'm sure. it's absolute shit. mtv marketing at it's best (or worst, rather)

Posted by: courtney 1 at November 20, 2008 4:50 PM

I recommend either Dawn or Petals on the Wind (I think).

Both salaciously trashy.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:55 PM

I know I've read both of them...ok, I'll check for them at the library. I want the most incestastic book I can get.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 4:56 PM

I hope you have Charlie Murphy in your head, courtney.

wrong! WRONG!

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 4:57 PM

Maybe you should just splurge for the $1.96 and buy one...excellent additions to anyone's home library, methinks.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 4:57 PM

i loved flowers in the attic and the other 4 books in that series. it was such trash, like reading days of our lives type smut. i loved it so much i read through everything v.c.andrews i could find. then in 8th grade i had to write a report on an author. i chose v.c. andrews only to find out she was dead and a ghost writer had taken over!!
no wonder the books all had the same incest themes

babysitter's club was alright, but i used to sneak my step sister's sweet valley high because it was so much dirtier. to my 10 year old mind, those were great.

Posted by: courtney 1 at November 20, 2008 4:59 PM

People, the best Sweet Valley High book is, hands down, Dear Sister. You know, the one where Elizabeth rides the motorcycle with Todd and they get into an accident and Elizabeth ends up in a coma and wakes up thinking she's Jessica and is all obnoxious and then dumps Todd and sluts it up with Bruce Patman and he touches her boob. Oh man, I was like eight when I read that book and it scandalised the hell out of me. That's probably why the V.C. Andrews books didn't freak me the fuck out like they should have, because I was already broken. My oblivious parents let me read whatever I wanted because they were all, "Books can't be bad!" They had no idea.

Posted by: Sarina at November 20, 2008 5:00 PM

Lizzie I also read Christopher Pike as a graduation from R L Stine, I absolutely loved those stories. Are either of those guys still writing?

Posted by: Annie_Reckson at November 20, 2008 5:02 PM

Oh man, I was like eight when I read that book and it scandalised the hell out of me.

ME TOO!!! Which is why I also was not disturbed by the VC Andrews books. Oh man, when my mother finally picked one up out of curiousity? That was a fun day.

Isn't there a SVH where a twin gets kidnapped? I need to reread them. Now.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 5:05 PM

Okay, as a high school English teacher, I may or may not have street cred in this discussion. So with that said....

There's literature, and then there's pop fiction. Sometimes there's overlap, but often, books that fall into the category of "great works of literature" don't also make the NY Times bestseller list. Written texts serve many purposes, from information to aesthetic / cultural / social value to simple entertainment.

While I teach Shakespeare, Achebe, Wiesel, Atwood, Harper Lee, Steinbeck, John Donne, etc., and while I read them (and others) for pleasure, sometimes I just want to pick up Dan Brown, John Grisham, Jennifer Weiner, etc. FOR FUN. I've read every "fad" on this list (I'm actually currently on the second Twilight book) and sometimes I want to just get pulled along for the ride. It's like the difference between Schindler's List and National Treasure - one's serious art, the other's a stupid rollercoaster.

Look, is the writing superb? Is the text teaching "morality" or "feminism" or whatever else people want to bitch about? Does it have literary value? Most of the time, no. (Although as an English teacher, I do appreciate the vocabulary my kids are learning from Twilight.) But I'd rather they engage in some written text, instead of the computer / cell phone / TV / video game / movie / other form of technology that's taking away our culture's ability to appreciate the written word.

Posted by: Ariel at November 20, 2008 5:06 PM

"why isn't Lord of the Rings on the list? I mean, yeah Harry Potter spawned a lot of terrible clones ... but Lord of the Rings ... how many more bible fairy tales "disguised" as fantasy can one take?"

Posted by: Le Kim Nguyen at November 20, 2008 4:10 PM

Because LOTR isn't a bible fairy tale. You're confusing it with "The Chronicals of Narnia" which is a bible fairy tale. I love LOTR. I hate TCON. There's no comparison between the two. LOTR is not a children's series, it's a single novel broken into 3 parts to make printing more affordable during WWII. TCON is a children's series of 7 different stories that vaguely tie together and don't even appear in chronological order.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 20, 2008 5:06 PM

What freaks me out is that my mom knew exactly what VC Andrews books are all about. My grandmother read them, too, and I'd borrow them from her when she was done.

I must not have been more than 12 at the time, probably started reading them when I was 9 or 10.

Ridiculousness.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 5:06 PM

You diss Harry Potter, I don't like you. OK not entirely true, but I would strongly disagree with the assertion that they're no better than the average kid's fantasy lit.

Posted by: Joe at November 20, 2008 5:06 PM

i guess i never thought about the content of the v.c.andrews books until now. my sisters had read them before me, my mom was never around, but they kept me entertained and out of trouble. now that my 9 year old is reading, and we make our weekly trip to the used book store i might hesitate to pick them up for her (my little sister has all of my copies. she read more of the ghost writer v.c.andrews than i did)

Posted by: courtney 1 at November 20, 2008 5:11 PM

But I'd rather they engage in some written text, instead of the computer / cell phone / TV / video game / movie / other form of technology that's taking away our culture's ability to appreciate the written word.

Absolutely. It's like when people shit all over Oprah's book club. I don't care if people are rushing to the book store to buy a novel just because Oprah tells them to, they're still reading.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 5:13 PM

Who remembers 'Ralph' the penis? Judy Blume rocked.

Posted by: vab at November 20, 2008 5:14 PM

I started reading Stephen King in 5th grade. My teachers used to send home notes that they were concerned about my choice of literature. My mom worried, too, but refused to take a book from me unless it had dirty pictures in it.

I can remember reading Cujo when I was nine or ten and being a little scarred, though. Up until then, I didn't realize kids could die.

Posted by: superEdna at November 20, 2008 5:15 PM

"Who remembers 'Ralph' the penis?"

From Forever? Yeah, I was about nine when I read that. Again, no wonder V.C. Andrews didn't send me running for the hills; I was so warped already.

Posted by: Sarina at November 20, 2008 5:20 PM

I'm one of the 'a'most' who did not read the entire harry potter series. I read all but the last book because...i dont even know why i read the first, it never appealed to me but it was in my house, i think...i think one of my brothers was reading it..by then there where three or four of them out and i'd never heard of them until i nearly broke my neck falling over them.
Rowling stole the idea, for starters, and the books are fuck awful. I appreciate that she's sort of made it cool to read books when you're a kid again (I always did anyway but what ever)but she suhuuuuuuuuuuuucks hard
I hate that she's a succesful writer

Twilight's another one...i never ever heard of it until it was fucking everywhere ever and now my brother is reading the books which concerns me because he's too smart for that crud

Just...ach

Posted by: nadine at November 20, 2008 5:20 PM

I think those stupid Shopaholic books should have made it onto that list. God, I hate those stupid books...and the movie looks terrible.

Posted by: citizen_cris at November 20, 2008 5:21 PM

Hmmm....no one has mentioned the Shopaholic series yet? The main character made me scream in frustration. Stop buying shit you can't afford!!!! And then she is of course saved by the rich hot guy.

Also, if you loved Anne of Green Gables, I hope you read the Emily of New Moon trilogy. A little overly weepy, but amazing and winsome nonetheless.

Posted by: zygomatique at November 20, 2008 5:23 PM

Yes, that's it... Forever! The ruined rug! My naive 10-year-old eyes had never read such, such naughtiness... apart from flicking through my mothers well thumbed 'Lace' trilogy, that is. I've never wanted a goldfish since.

Posted by: vab at November 20, 2008 5:31 PM

Ooooh! Also, during a (terrible) date earlier this week, dude mentioned that his favourite book was the DaVinci Code. It took all of my niceness (limited) and strength (considerable) not to walk out at that moment. I walked out later on when he told me all about his strawberry shortcake fetish.

Posted by: zygomatique at November 20, 2008 5:38 PM

Ooooh! Also, during a (terrible) date earlier this week, dude mentioned that his favourite book was the DaVinci Code. It took all of my niceness (limited) and strength (considerable) not to walk out at that moment. I walked out later on when he told me all about his strawberry shortcake fetish (the act, not the character).

Posted by: zygomatique at November 20, 2008 5:39 PM

My parents were devout christians so I wasn't allowed to read any book until I finished the Bible. Yeah, I had a crush on both Samson and a young King David (because crushing on the old King David would've been gross).

Posted by: Phat girl at November 20, 2008 5:42 PM

strawberry shortcake fetish

Oh MAN, I hope you mean the tasty dessert.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 5:42 PM

Nevermind, Urban Dictionary has helped me out and made me barf. Eeeewwww.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 5:44 PM

How old are you Dustin? Because I used to love the Sweet Valley series, and I'm only 21. I didn't read High though, I read middle school (because I was in middle school) Yea they sucked, yea they're badly written and formulaic and just dumb overall, but I was a teenage girl and had bad stereotypical taste in books.

Posted by: dene chen at November 20, 2008 5:49 PM

At this point I'm hoping he means the little scented dolls, Julie.

Not even Mooj would go there.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 5:50 PM

Same here. That's a more acceptable level of disturbing.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 5:52 PM

I'm glad others have the love for C.Pike and RLStine! Yay! I loved all those horror books when I was wee.

It looks like Stine has slowed down of late, nothing has been released this year.

Pike does have a book out this year, called Falling.

As for HP, I've read the first three books at least five times. each. i love them. I've actually been meaning to read them again, straight through.

Does anyone else read the Dresden Files? Or the Kushiel books?

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 5:53 PM

Does it involve butthole pleasures?

Posted by: admin at November 20, 2008 5:53 PM

Marquis de Sade at 12 and onward through adolescence.

Interesting times.

Lightweight, it ain't.

Posted by: Recondite at November 20, 2008 5:55 PM

Oh if ONLY, admin

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 5:57 PM

I just read through the comments, and I have to say a couple things:
@ Kayanne: Animorphs were the shiznitz- they were AWESOME.
@ Meaux: The twins are a size 4 now??? That's AWFUL, I can't believe it, they have been size 6s for a gazillion years. Ugh, this is a great direction we are heading.

Posted by: dene chen at November 20, 2008 5:59 PM

It involves punching. And fluids of various colors. Bleh. Excuse me while I cleanse my mind by humping my Crepes Suzette dolly.

Posted by: Julie at November 20, 2008 6:02 PM

Lizzieborden, i read the Dresden files...i just...they started out borderline cheesy and it just got worse and worse ...then the series came out and missed the point entirely...i gave them up

I used to read the Anita Blake, Merry Gentry, and Sookie Stackhouse books too, but i find that with series like that, eventually the narrative has to build to something and since they're books they can go really wild and more often than not the author goes fucking insane

Posted by: nadine at November 20, 2008 6:02 PM

Well, to be accurate -

Angels and Demons was published first, and was a much, much better book than The Da Vinci Code

Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at November 20, 2008 6:04 PM

Wow! Barbies! Babysitters Club (MaryAnn's hot boyfriend Logan was totally my first literary crush)! Stine and Pike! Crushing on young king David! All spiraling into what? The Marquis de Sade! Totally Awse, y'all. Thanks for the memories.

Posted by: hb at November 20, 2008 6:05 PM

oh oh! Christopher Pike and RL Stine!! My sister and I read those, we loved them!!

Posted by: nadine at November 20, 2008 6:05 PM

Thank you Meaux, it's nice to know I'm not the only one. I will read the books some day, what I didn't get during the whole craze was why did I have to read them right that instant? If they're as good as everyone says, I can wait, they'll still be good when the hype dies down right?

On another topic, what about Goosebumps?

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at November 20, 2008 6:07 PM

two words: Boxcar Children.
Awesome.

Posted by: VeinsRHiways at November 20, 2008 6:08 PM

ah, nadine... I love the Dresden Files. Mostly for Dresden himself. I really feel like there's been good character development and that the series has really improved. But, considering they're kinda a takeoff of pulp, the cheese is to be expected. :)

Agreed about the show, though. It totally missed the point of the series. Paul Blackthorne is all kinds of gorgeous though.

I used to read the Anita Blake books as well. Until they just got to the point of being glorified porn. And the author's antics really rub me the wrong way. I am still reading the Sookie Stackhouse books, slowly.

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 6:09 PM

I read the Little House books, and never forgave Michael Landon for not staying true to the books in the TV series. I also read Beverly Cleary, the Nancy Drew, Tom Swift, Sue Barton, etc. series(es). Does anyone remember the "Happy Hollisters" family of crime-solving sleuths? They were all siblings who solved crimes.

Then I hit the Sidney Shelden/Harold Robbins books when I got a little older. I don't know how my mom let me read them. I even read them at school during study halls. I'm surprised the school let me get away with having them on school property. I guess as long as I didn't disturb anyone else, it was OK.

Posted by: rlr260 at November 20, 2008 6:13 PM

Lizzie, exactly, Laurel K Hamilton has gone fucking insane, her books are....i mean is there even a plot any more????

Posted by: nadine at November 20, 2008 6:18 PM

Kayanne, Dene chen: I LOVED Animorphs. We were going through the storage units in the backyard this summer and found a whole bag full of them, along with Goosebumps, Fear Street and and shitton of Christopher Pike and Dean Koontz books. And Babysitter's club, now that I think about it.

I got into Harry Potter when the movies were coming out. I was 11 when the first book came out (Holy crap that was long time ago...) so I was really able to relate to the characters and what was going on with them as I technically grew up with them. I read the first book in the 30 minutes it took to get to the theater and be seated. Since then my mom has had to buy three copies of each book since we couldn't share as my little sister read slower than I did and my big sister read faster.

By the way, I adore Bridget Jones's Diary and teh Edge of Reason. I also loved The Da Vinci Code even though you really have to think of that book as pure fiction. Even eliminate Jesus from your thoughts and pretend that the religion is fake. The only thing I didn't like about it was the whole "grandparents-fucking-in-a-group" thing. That was wholly unnecessary.

Posted by: NotBlonde at November 20, 2008 6:18 PM

Now that I'm obsessing over the literary habits of my youth, I think a Christopher Pike book was the last thing I read , when I was maybe twelve, before my mom introduced me to David Eddings' Belgariad and my life changed forever.

Posted by: hb at November 20, 2008 6:24 PM

Ohhhh dene chen & Not Blonde I just did a Google search for Animorphs to relive the glory of the cover images and I assure you, it was not cool.

Also, Animorphs: The Show.

Heeheehee, Shawn Ashmore.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 6:29 PM

Hahahaha...oh, Julie. Oh...Julie. I have no words.

But just in case, I have a bottle of genuine Mexican tequila sitting there on the shelf for use in dire emergencies. Just in case you need it.

Posted by: figgy at November 20, 2008 6:30 PM

oh! I just thought

I'm reading a series right now...or rather, waiting for the fourth installment...i hope against hope one of you guys recognises it, and is a fan, and since i already think really high of you guys, i'd probably cry or something since sometimes i think im imagining these books then wonder why i dont write it down since they're AWESOME

the Felix Castor books, by Mike Carey?

The Devil You Know, A Vicious Circle and Dead Mens Boots, so far...

Just amazing, old fashioned, grumpy, surly detective with an irrepresable charm and dry wit, sees the dead and works as an exorcist in a ghost, ghoul and loup garou infested London

I Mean Mike Carey ANYWAY but the best thing is that Felix, Fix, is a scouser by birth...so as a scouser by birth im just about in love with him

Posted by: Nadine at November 20, 2008 6:34 PM

I've only read the first chapter of the HP books. Reading all the Huffypuffy names kind of pissed on my brain so I haven't read any of them since. I enjoy the movies though.

I read The Davinci Code at the lake after I finished the other three books I brought and it was all that was available. I remember that, after I finished the last sentence, I wondered what had just happend to me. Then I called the police, filed a report and had my wife take me to the hospital so I could have a rape kit performed.

Posted by: admin at November 20, 2008 6:35 PM

These aren't exactly "fads" that you're talking about. Merely popular books or a series of books.

A fad would be attributed to a style of book or a trend for certain areas of literature that are popular at the moment.

Posted by: fred at November 20, 2008 6:35 PM

the Felix Castor books, by Mike Carey?

nope, but i just added them to my amazon wishlist. they do sound awesome. looks like only the first two are available on this side of the pond.

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 6:40 PM

I was disturbed as a child.

lizzieborden

Lizzie, if it makes you feel any better, my Barbie had more salacious activities than yours. My mom used to let me watch All My Children when I was home from school. The Barbies would fall, get amnesia, forget that they were married to Ken, marry GI Joe, then realize that they were knocked up by Ken, leave GI Joe, who would have been cheating on them with Midge.

There was also secret relatives and whole lot of naughty time in my Barbie Playhouse Mansion. Someone was also usually pushed down the stairs, off the balcony, drinks thrown, slap fights, you name it.

My childhood may explain so much.

Whoever named Michael Crichton as bad literature is wrong in my opinion. His books were intelligent, good reads that did not make you stupider for having read them.

All of the childhood reads mentioned were some of my favorites.

Posted by: Melody at November 20, 2008 6:41 PM

Ace list.

I'm quite proud to say I never really succumb to pop culture, thus saying, I couldn't care natch about Harry Porter and Da Vinci Code. I've never so much as had any urgings to read them. And I read a lot.

On the other hand, I adored Sweet Valley High. Who could forget Todd and Elizabeth???

kalafraja and all you Babysitters Club lovers, Those where the good days...I even went as far to read Babysitters little sister, the diaries and the specials.

Posted by: Jean at November 20, 2008 6:41 PM

Lizzie you are a wise woman =)

Posted by: Nadine at November 20, 2008 6:41 PM

zygomatique - I loved Emily of New Moon. It made me want to be a writer and die of consumption in a garet...someday I hope to acheive my goals.

Posted by: Killa at November 20, 2008 6:42 PM

Where is the love for Ramona Quimby? I still own my collection of Ramona books.

Posted by: Melody at November 20, 2008 6:43 PM

Did anyone on Pajiba...NOT mutilate their barbies, Action Men, GI Joe's or Kens?

Because i definately fucked them UP, i even tortured the little shelly doll once by hacking off her hair and biting off one of her fingers

I still have all my barbies actually...every now and then, my sister and i (im 22, she's 24) will dig them out and play with them all, usually really mental games too, ones that usually end up with action man(the original, British GI Joe or...something)being the father of teenage courtenays several bastard children while her olde, richer sister Barbie ignored her plight as an unwed, underage mother and tried to bone AM since she was sexually broken for as yet unknown reasons

But yeah...say something if you didnt fuck barbie up?

Posted by: Nadine at November 20, 2008 6:49 PM

All this Sweet Valley High chat has made me long to read one, so I trek over to Ebay and what do you know, Peeps are selling some of our past on there.

So tempted...

Posted by: Jean at November 20, 2008 6:54 PM

All this Sweet Valley High chat has made me long to read one, so I trek over to Ebay and what do you know, Peeps are selling some of our past on there. There are already people bidding for it.

Awwwwwwwww.

So tempted...

Posted by: Jean at November 20, 2008 6:55 PM

And you know what? I like vampires. I like werewolves. And I hate to see them used as vehicles for a tweeny, soft-core romance. Come the fuck on: A vegetarian vampire?

Thank you, Dustin. Thankyouthankyouthankyou!

I like my vampires fanged and viewing all of humanity as a gourmet nine course feast just waiting to be messily devoured.

Also, isn't the main vampire GLITTERY? So... vampires are just a butt-stamp and a mane away from being My Little Ponies, is that what Meyer is saying? Because I can NOT get behind that.

Posted by: VampireNomad at November 20, 2008 7:04 PM

I'm quite proud to say I never really succumb to pop culture, thus saying, I couldn't care natch about Harry Porter

Proud?

PROUD?

GOD DAMN YOU!


('cause when does one get to quote that line?)

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 7:06 PM

I am proud to say that I have never read The Da Vinci Code, nor will I ever.

It looks like there's a new "graphic novel" for the BSC. Ridiculousness.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 7:07 PM

http://claudiasroom.blogspot.com/

for the babysitters club fans... it's the shit. Its almost as though she was a fan of this site.

Personally I always was a Stacey girl

Posted by: lizziebeth at November 20, 2008 7:11 PM

Omg...anything by Nicholas Sparks. And I hate how everything he writes gets turned into an equally horrific movie. I would love to NEVER EVER hear the words "from the bestselling author of 'The Notebook.'"

Posted by: Tracy at November 20, 2008 7:11 PM

is that what Meyer is saying?

Well, she's not putting a new twist on old lore. She admittedly doesn't know the lore and hasn't read but one Anne Rice book I think. She doesn't know how vampires "work". As I've said before, even the adult romance versions of monsters who act the same way (they don't hurt anyone, but there's always a bad apple from out of town who wants to spoil everything I mean what an asshole! Gah!) generally conform to what the average person knows. In this case the "vegetarian" thing means they just run around in the forest killing animals...like Teen Wolf or the safe adult monsters...except Meyer's werewolves apparently aren't actually werewolves.

What I'm tryin to say here is, well, it seems that she doesn't know what she's saying, and thus probably couldn't answer your question.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27788655/

This article is a hoot, especially the last section.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 7:18 PM

shit...i just remembered the theme tune for the sweet valley high tv show..some of it anyway;


look back down in the crowded hall/i see there's a beauty standing/is she really everywhere or/
am i dreeeeeeeaaaaaaamin

sweeeeeeeeeeeet valley! sweeeeeeeeeeeet valley hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh sweet valley

aaaaaaaaaaaargh

Posted by: nadine at November 20, 2008 7:19 PM

Jay!

Line-quoting or not, that kind of anger is not tolerated 'round these parts. Pajiba is a place of welcoming so you should just get the hell out.

I'm taking back the cookie I gave you for using the word sully. *glare*

And don't sass me for not having read Harry Potter, either. Sheesh, we non-HP readers get enough flack from the ridiculously obsessive classmates that yack our ear off about how we're uneducated heathens. So what if I pretended to care about the series as I listened to a guy I had a huge crush on talk about Hogwarts and Hermoine and then when he found out I was "ignorant" he scoffed!

Grrr... Fucker said that my personality reminded him of that Professor Trelawney character. *sobs* I may be bespectacled but I never wore coke bottle glasses!

Oh I am sorry, what were we talking about again?

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 7:24 PM

There's some good ideas in this thread and I too like Harry Potter (so there!), so let me just chip in a sheepish admission:
IstillownandregularlyreadacollectionofGordonKorman'sfinestworks.

runs away

Posted by: lordhelmet at November 20, 2008 7:25 PM

Just amazing, old fashioned, grumpy, surly detective with an irrepresable charm and dry wit, sees the dead and works as an exorcist in a ghost, ghoul and loup garou infested London

Uhh....kind of sounds like the Frighteners (FAVORITE HORROR MOVIE EVER! SHUT UP!) set in London.

Also sounds like my type of book. My least favorite thing about when semesters are in session is that my reading decreases extremely since I'm constantly reading texts rather than what I want to read.

Posted by: Annie_Reckson at November 20, 2008 7:31 PM

Does anyone remember the SVH boardgame? Please tell me I'm not the only one who had that.

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 7:32 PM

My friend just sent me this in an e-mail entitled "A Typical Twilight Fan"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-turfrcQY-w

I've never met one and I know pretty much nothing about the books, but I thoroughly enjoyed this.

Posted by: Lux at November 20, 2008 7:34 PM

I have a weird relationship with the Harry Potter books. I haven't read a one but I know I would love them if I did. But I was kind of bitter when they first came out because there were authors creating these kind of characters and worlds before Rowling but no one really gave a shit and I didn't really get why. It was like it was suddenly "ok" to read scifi/fantasy books when that sort of stuff used to get you ridiculed as a kid. I grew up reading Lloyd Alexander and Robin McKinley (seriously, I slept with "The Blue Sword" and "The Hero and the Crown" under my pillow) and it kind of pissed me off that other great authors that I enjoyed as a youngun never got the kind of recognition as Rowling. So, I didn't read them because I am stubborn.
That being said, I do respect that fact that they got a lot of kids to read. I remember back when I worked as a camp counselor in the summers there were a bunch of kids lugging those huge books around with them so they could read a chapter or two during lunch. That's pretty great.

Posted by: Manna at November 20, 2008 7:36 PM

Uhh....kind of sounds like the Frighteners (FAVORITE HORROR MOVIE EVER! SHUT UP!)

i love that movie. i just watched it this past weekend. it's really pretty underrated if you ask me.

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 7:38 PM

we non-HP readers get enough flack from the ridiculously obsessive classmates that yack our ear off about how we're uneducated heathens.

Actually it's really my sneaky way to ask "Why the hell haven't you read 'Kingdome Come'?????"

Besides, any guy rhapsodizing over Hermione Granger and not Ginny Weasley ain't worth your time anyway.

(Kidding, Hermione fans! Kidding!!)

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 7:39 PM

I will tell you for free.

I have a 10 year old daughter who was determined to read "Twilight". I told her what the series was about. I asked her if she thought she was ready for it, if it was too much for her. She put it on hold at the library. It finally became available and she brought it home. Her father told her not to read it until I had given my official approval. I looked at some passages in the book. I checked various websites and forums to discover if its content would be appropriate for a 10 year old. I finally decided to let her read it.

Her reaction?

"Eh, it was okay. Do we have any ice cream left?"

I could not have been more proud if she had become the first pre-adolescent/black/female President of the United States of America.

I am thinking of having her cloned.

Posted by: greer at November 20, 2008 7:44 PM

Annie, I like that movie too.
And I had the same problem at university, my reading level dropped dramatically no matter how hard i tried not to let it...so now i have this back log of like, three years worth of books i bought but either only just started or never started at all, Everything is Illuminated amongst them, I am Legend, just loads i thought 'shit, i'd love to read these when im at this age' for what ever reason

So i'm slowly catching up, only now i've got a job so once again, my time is stolen from me like the fairies steal children, only my time isn't returned in changling form its just fucking gone

Posted by: nadine at November 20, 2008 7:44 PM

lizzieborden, i have read all of the Kushiel books. and i love them, from the pleasure/pain premise on down. they were a quick, fun read.

i haven't read any of the series on this list, but i started reading Harry Potter to my son when he was in kindergarten. we only got through book 3 because he preferred the movies as he thought the books were as boring as i did.

am i the only person who thought Ken was gay? i never had Barbie & Ken getting it on because i just didn't think that was right--what? i was a kid. it just didn't seem right that Ken would be with Barbie when he clearly preferred men. plus, i liked Christie way more than that b!tch Barbie.

Posted by: pq at November 20, 2008 7:52 PM

"Does anyone remember the SVH boardgame? Please tell me I'm not the only one who had that."

I... still have it. Ohmigosh, you should come over! I'll make popcorn, and we can play that shitty ass game, and then do each other's makeup so we look like drag queen showgirls, and then make prank phone calls to QVC in foreign-accented old lady voices, demanding that they let us buy the set furniture. Also, we can consume copious amounts of liquor, and then drunk-dial ex boyfriends. It'll be awesome as hell.

Posted by: Sarina at November 20, 2008 7:53 PM

lemme grab my keys, Sarina! how long you think it takes to get from the east coast to practically the great white north? three days?

*door slams*


*car starts*


*tires peeling out*

Posted by: lizzieborden at November 20, 2008 7:58 PM

I really liked the first 3 Harry Potter books, and then hated the fourth one with a burning passion that will not die. He was just so...teenagey and whiny. I don't want real, annoying teenagers around in my free time, and especially not in my fantasy novels.

I was not allowed to have Barbies when I was little. I did, however, read all the Encyclopedia Brown books. And Choose Your Own Adventure!

Posted by: Phaeolus at November 20, 2008 8:02 PM

Yea, nadine I'm really sick of being in college. My two favorite authors are Nick Hornby and Don Miller and I'm really trying to finish reading all of their books but I just end up flipping through my tattered copy of High Fidelity because I don't have the time proper to start a fresh book. Speaking of Everything is Illuminated, I still need to read Foer's other book. That's probably going to be the next one I read, followed by Pablo Paramo and A Hundred Years of Solitude.


Speaking of, I feel really bad that I don't have any female authors that I read regularly. I just read a book by Sloane Crosley, but I don't have a female favorite author, any suggestions?

Posted by: Annie_Reckson at November 20, 2008 8:16 PM

Christ, in that case it's a good thing you stopped before "Order of the Phoenix" or you'd have combusted. That was the high water mark of his impossible teenagerdom.

But I realized I was going about this the wrong way.

Without the Harry Potter books...

THIS WOULD NOT EXIST!!!!!

http://www.illegal-art.org/video/wizard.html

It would be impossible for anything's existence to be more justified.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 8:17 PM

Besides, any guy rhapsodizing over Hermione Granger and not Ginny Weasley ain't worth your time anyway.

Honestly, Jay, I don't remember what specifically he was mentioning but I didn't want to look up muggles and I knew how to spell Hermoine.

But hey, direct any "worthy" guys this way. I'm worried kalafraja is only saying she'll be my stalker and that her heart truly belongs to Julie.

Dammit we can't all be as lovable as Julie! *pout*

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 8:18 PM

I knew how to spell Hermoine.

I see what you did there.

It's not fiction, but have you read Laurie Notaro's books, Annie?

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 8:22 PM

Hey, Dustin! Is the Recent back on? Or is that just teasing me in the Preview screen? Go-Go Bugless Pajiba!

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 8:33 PM

lizzieborden,

You and I may have had the same childhood. I wasted many an afternnon with my three frinds playing the SVH boardgame. We always argued over who got to be Lila (the bitch) and who had to be Enid. I mean, who wants to be Enid?

Also, I love the Kushiel novels. I nearly had a heart attack when I saw there was another sequel to Kushiels Scion (can't remember the title now, but the one with Imriel and Sidonie) Then I went back and reread the whole series. Now I moved on to another series, about vampires, by Karen Chance. Can't decide if I like it or not, but at least the vampires are vampires and not seeming rejects from Claires boutique.

Posted by: herhseygirl at November 20, 2008 8:40 PM

Can't say that I have. Is it a book I should chase after a copy of, right now?

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 8:44 PM

Oh, if you mean me, I was trying to answer Annie's recommendation request, but I unreservedly recommend Laurie Notaro to everyone.

Funny. Very, very funny.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 8:51 PM

I second the Laurie Notaro recommendation. She will rock your socks off with the funny.

Posted by: Sarina at November 20, 2008 9:03 PM

Ugh that's embarrassing. Apparently when I order pizza I become a narcissist and assume everything is directed at me.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 9:04 PM

Kayanne, are you stalker-cheating on me already?

Oh my. I can't even maintain the attraction of a stalker for 12 hours. I give up at life.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 9:11 PM

Oh kalafrie, baby! I'm not stalker cheating on you. I was just worried that you had gone and left me for Julie, lovable lady minx that she is.

Besides, you're my lady stalker. A girl just needs a man stalker sometimes. Please forgive me! I'm weak.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 9:15 PM

Of course I haven't abandoned you. When I stalk, I stalk for keeps. I'm not fickle about matters of the heart, or of obsession.

I hear you on the man-stalk front. And I use man-stalk as a euphemism. Oh dear.

I need to read some wholesome Anne Shirley tales to rid me of my wicked thoughts.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 9:19 PM

Don't beat yourself up on my account. I time travel in conversation all the time, and will resume the previous subject exactly where I left off, or answer the question you asked two hours, a day, two years ago. I will expect you to finish your story too. My best friend in college routinely left stories incomplete and I was perpetually flustered. Even if he was the taller skinny one I was most definitely C-3PO in that arrangement (but that's who I am whoever I'm around. Everyone knows that). In an internet forum I'll probably also be referring to two hour old topics to three different people at once.

I'm the only one who ever really knows where I'm going with this. When even I don't then it gets really bad. Not that I frown on people I've confused, I feel sorry for them.

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 9:22 PM

man-stalk as a euphemism

Mmmmm man-stalk.

And yay! I have a stalker. Also, we both have amazing boobies.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 9:24 PM

The force of our boobies together could change the world. SuperBoob Squared.

Posted by: kalafraja at November 20, 2008 9:28 PM

I will expect you to finish your story too.

You mean the story about the DOA date or the Wall-E date or the little ditty about Jack & Diane?

I should in form you that sometime after the pizza was delivered I found a large glass of wine... So if I start referencing old 80s hits it is not my fault. And this probably doesn't help my argument that I sing karaoke sober (rather prefer it that way).

But you know, you see my true colors. true colors that are beautiful.

Beautiful. Like a rainbow.

And I'm done.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 9:33 PM

Doesn't it feel icky when you figure out the line is "suckin on a chili dog"?

Yeesh.

And since I've usually gotta sing alone on a Monday night, when I have no business being out that late either, I'm my own designated driver and have to keep things light. But with my tolerance I buzz fast and just let it coast and fade out. "Going drinking" would be useless with me as I'd be smashed in a half hour if I was putting forth the effort. And remember, kids: if it's 1 am and you've sobered back up, LET IT LIE. I've heard sad stories that begin with "were you there for the absinthe?" "Oh Jesus....yeah, that was after I left."

Posted by: Jay at November 20, 2008 9:49 PM

The force of our boobies together could change the world. SuperBoob Squared.

Yes. kalafraja let's make a comic. Or something.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 9:49 PM

Awww! lordhelmet, I picked up a boxed set of Bruno and Boots books at a yard sale a couple of years back, just for old time's sake (I totally had a crush on Boots growing up!). Can't wait to pass them on to my little nephew.

Posted by: meaux at November 20, 2008 9:52 PM

And since I've usually gotta sing alone on a Monday night, when I have no business being out that late either, I'm my own designated driver and have to keep things light.

Aww, Jay, you and me have got to go Karaokeing together! Atlanta is only... *checks Google Maps*

Oh. 5 and a half hours away. Man!

Oh well, I can just serenade you and the rest of the Pajibaverse over the internet.

Posted by: Kayanne at November 20, 2008 9:56 PM

I had no Kens. My Barbies all had salacious affairs with my anthropomorphic stuffed animals. There was a pink rabbit that got a lot of tail.

I love the Chronicles of Narnia. Those are fantasy (and having grown up sans the corrupting influence of the Bible, I don't hold C. S. Lewis's religious views agains the stories). The Lord of the Rings is the feverish ravings of an obssesive compulsive.

Anyone read John Bellairs? The House with a Clock in its Walls? Freaking awesome, and illustrated by Edward Gorey (I seem to remember some Goreyphiles around here).

And then there was Brian Jacques' little warrior rodents. Loved me those sword-wielding mice!

Posted by: frumpiefox at November 20, 2008 9:59 PM

As a teacher of ages 9-12, I have to really give credit for the whole Harry Potter phenomenon. Whether you like the book or not, you have to admit that it made the market for books geared towards that age group EXPLODE. And, consequently, there are now so many good, or at least entertaining, books out there for that age group, both for boys and girls. With so much selection out there, I find that many more kids (including boys) are begining to devour books. What could be better than that?

Posted by: 2cents at November 20, 2008 10:10 PM

I'm so glad to see the Da Vinci Code on here! After all the hype and so many recommendations, I read it, and for a week after, all I could say was SERIOUSLY?

Posted by: EmmaDilemma at November 20, 2008 11:27 PM

Oh my Godtopus, I've been waiting for this.

There is a book, a result of the whole DaVinci Code imitation fallout, that I'm warning you, NO ONE WHO LIKES WORDS, THOUGHTS, or ANY OF THE ABOVE STRUNG TOGETHER IN NOVEL FORM...SHOULD...EVER...TOUCH.

I can't go into it, it's too painful...it's the literary equivalent of eating a bad batch of menudo. The Third Translation by Matt Bondurant...for the love of God, just trust me. Please.

Posted by: Smokin at November 20, 2008 11:43 PM

Can I come play the SVH boardgame with you guys? I'll bring over Mall Madness and Dream Phone to round out the night's festivities!

Posted by: popejenn at November 20, 2008 11:48 PM

I'm late to the game as per usual but I just want to mention my favorite author as a kid.

Madeline L'Engle. Now and forever. There was nothing fucking cooler than Wrinkle in Time and all the other sequels and spin-offs.

Posted by: Sharon at November 20, 2008 11:52 PM

holy crap is this thread long...I just want to make it known for the record that when I was a teenage girl, I was reading motherfucking Douglas Adams. (and then all the boys discovered him and were like, "these Hitchhiker books are so cool!" and I was all, "pfft. I already read them. Twice.")

Posted by: s. pisasrer at November 21, 2008 12:07 AM

Somehow, when I read the title I knew that you would go after the Potter series. I may even give a certain level of social pressure during the middle titles but not with the last two and even the upcoming Rowling release.
But...seeing two major suburbs of Chicago shut down to host Potter parties, throws it off this list. It was beyond pressure, it was an investment into the series at to the literary characters, and people that really cared about what happened on the written page. For such a literate and intelligent person as yourself, I find it hard to believe that you do not see the value in this.

I am also surprised that you did not take a swipe at the Ryan books by Tom Clancy. Considering they spawned a bunch of shitty movies, with the exception of Hunt for Red October, and video gaming empire and is written by a right-leaning author I figured this to be a perfect target.

Posted by: richmac at November 21, 2008 1:03 AM

Lurlene McDaniel!!! I wasn't the only one. I read every single book. Multiple times. What the fuck does that say about me and/or my childhood that I was obsessed with books about teenage girls dying from cancer? And they had the best titles "Six Months to Live," "Baby Alicia is Dying," or my personal favorite "Mother, Help Me Live." Anyone care to analyze that?

And I was definitely a Stacey fan as far as BSC goes. I was jealous of her only-child status and since she had blonde hair, I guess I felt I could relate more. How many of you out there tried to form your own babysitters club and failed miserably after the second week?

Posted by: Austin at November 21, 2008 1:31 AM

"2. Da Vinci Code. God, what a terrible book."

I have never loved you more, Rowles. I've always wanted to get my hands around the neck of whoever edited that roiling piece of crap and choke the bejesus out of them. This book is a deal breaker for me; if a guy admits to thinking it's good, they need to not be in my life anymore.

Posted by: TallulahBelle at November 21, 2008 1:53 AM

Have none of you ever been exposed to the ooey gooey snarkalicious goodness of thedairiburger.wordpress.com? For shame! Everyone who's mentioned SVH, BSC, R.L. Stine, Little House, or stupid rich bitch books in this thread must go there. Now.

Posted by: Kris at November 21, 2008 2:48 AM

Re: the Baby-sitters' Club. The best thing is that there's now a website you can go to that looks back on the "fashions" described in the books, so you can truly see how bug-nutty they truly are. http://whatclaudiawore.blogspot.com/ 'Cause we all know that Claudia was like one of those girls that you'd see on Go Fug Yourself or something.

Posted by: megaera at November 21, 2008 3:38 AM

I wish that everyone who's read the Harry Potter series would read His Dark Materials trilogy. Prepare to have your minds blown...

Posted by: Ali at November 21, 2008 3:50 AM

Oh lord helmet, I love Gordon Korman!
Are we supposed to be sheepish about that now?

Also Jay I believe you're right. Meyer doesn't know how vampires 'work' and what's more, I don't believe she cares. I read some thing she wrote about how excited she was to be on set while they were filming 'Twilight' and how one of the actors asked if vampires ever ate food and how she told them 'no never' and then they asked what would happen if they did eat a bit of of food - because apparently Glittery Hunk Vampire eats a bite of apple or something equally as stupidly metaphoric - and her response was something akin to "I had to explain the icky truth to them - that the vampire would have to spit the food back up later". Good lord! Let me explain the 'icky' truth to you, ignorant 'Twilight' matriarch. Vampires don't eat food because all they want is to pierce your jugular and suck down every last drop of your sweet precious blood and if you suffer while they do it even better and when you die they don't mourn your passing by reciting poetry and if they fall in love with you it's only until they're close enough to drink you dry and also VAMPIRES ARE NOT GLITTERY.

I need to stop now. This thread is making my inner rage outer.

Posted by: VampireNomad at November 21, 2008 4:33 AM

i might MIGHT still have a few of the babysitter club books of my sisters floating around our house

I hated them personally, and the sweet valley high books, but i'd be happy to sell some of them (if if IF i still have them) to any of you guys who might want them =)

I'll have to a) find them and b)figure out what ones they are but just let me know

Hey on the subject of Harry Potter, someone mentioned the names being what did for them? Yeah that was part of it for me too, that and the really terrible writing ( i HATE her) But i was reading something recently that talks about cults, and about how cults, right, will have what is almost their own language, and how its designed specifically to make the members of the cult feel like they're part of something special and anyone outside of the cult feel seperated and alienated and either yearning to join or mor elikely to keep their distance.


I mean im just saying, is all.

Hey surely those fucking dragon books should be on here?? The ones the kid wrote when he was seventeen and they made the film of and its teeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeerrible and basically Star Wars?

Posted by: nadine at November 21, 2008 4:39 AM

Hi late to the party as usual.
I love the harry potter books with a fiery passion! They remind me of being a kid and escaping into a good book also my heart breaks for any little kid whose an orphan, has a horrible home life and on top of that has to fight a noseless Rafe fiennes.

I also adored point horror as a young kid, anything creepy and ghoulish-R.L Stein, Christopher Pike, Stephen King if it had a monster, murderer, demented storyline I was in.
Judy Bloom was my heroine-I so wanted to be an american kid.
I read the SVH books and liked then but the whole gorgeous size 6 twins really bugged me especially as the sizing is different in the UK and for me being a size 6 was a pre pubescent childs body and when I hit size 8 I wanted to kill myself. Plus their fashion taste was a little off to my oh so trendy british sensibilities.

Yes I hold my hands up me and my friends did start a babysitting club and I had to be becky and my best friend had to be mallory because we were technically the youngest by a few months. It was all fun and games until I started babysitting my numerous younger and older siblings from the age of 11 and I realised those books were a big fat lie! Babysitting is not fun, the safety of others is to much responsibility, children are evil and NO I didnt get paid. I still read them though so I could sit in my room and make sarcastic comments about claudia's fashion sense and occasionally scream 'Lies all Lies. LIARS ALL OF YOU LIARS' I left the fake babysitting group because none of the other girls had actually babysat before and just didnt understand.

I didnt just read crap though I remember reading american psycho around the age of 10, I thought it was beyond boring though, Jane Austen was a firm favourite and still is, I read Bridget Jones's Diary when I was 11 and though I loved it I prayed to God I didnt end up like her when I was a grown up....Im still waiting for him to get back to me on that. I never read 'flowers in the attic' as Iv mentioned before incest does not fly with me I cant read about it, watch it (im looking at you star wars)or talk about it, it makes me feel ill.

Iv been reading the Kathy Reichs series since uni and I love it and I recommend it to anyone with an interest in sexy anthropology and often demented storylines. These days I need a heavy, engrossing, sometimes violent murder mystery and a silly rom-com to balance it out, at least once a week.

Yeah my barbie always got together with Action Man because he had movable limbs, Kens just stuck straight out how could barbie be with a guy whose arms didnt bend?. I had a total crush on action man hell I still do. Ooooh nadine Ive thought of a new game Action Man talk show host!!!!

Posted by: nieve at November 21, 2008 5:35 AM

Ha! I was a [quasi] hipster in high school! Never read a damn WORD of those Harry Potter monstrosities. The hype itself was enough to drive me away from it. There was this Harry Potter fanatic I knew in 9th grade who had this t-shirt (WHICH SHE MADE HERSELF) that on one side said something like "Harry Potter isn't the most important thing in the world..." to which I cheered her for only to be shown the other side, which read "...but it's up there with oxygen!"

Fucking maniacs.

What I DID partake in was the R.L. Stine (Goosebumps!) craze among elementary school kids back in the mid-90's. Then again, that wasn't exactly obnoxious. R.L. Stine couldn't frighten a three-year old and we knew it, but the stories themselves were kinda neat.

Posted by: vic at November 21, 2008 5:35 AM

Woah there nadine, those are My books and if anyone will be selling that crap it will be me so keep your grubby hands off them.
Also Dont offer to sell parts of my childhood!!!

Posted by: nieve at November 21, 2008 5:39 AM

My Barbies were always involved in some raging sapphic drama. It's totally my parent's fault. Hello, you bought me like 25 Barbies and only one Ken.

Posted by: AdaHaze at November 21, 2008 5:57 AM

Chicken Soup for the Vegetarian

Posted by: Bill Ectric at November 21, 2008 8:19 AM

1. I completely disagree with Harry Potter's presence on this list. Those are totally decent books. Freaking fantastic when compared to other kids' lit. I personally devoured each and every one of those the day they came out. I also liked that it promoted conversation about children's literature and reading. Can't be a bad thing, right? Also, it was fun to have something to talk about with my young cousins. How often do people of all ages and backgrounds have such a weird commonality? I can't tell you how many people - old people, kids, young professionals, college students - struck up conversation with me on the train when I was reading a Harry Potter book. I have nothin' but love for HP.

And Julie, Sideways Stories from Wayside School kicked ass. I read that a couple of years back and it's still awesome.

As for SVH, I always thought it was boring. I preferred, like, Christopher Pike and Lois Duncan and LJ Smith. The guys in SVH were LAME. Todd? Puhlease.

And my barbies never did anything, because my friends and I spent hours divvying up the furniture and clothes and had to go home by the time we were done. Kind of cute - I always really wanted my mom to play Barbies with me (she only would once in a while) because we actually played and she made up really good Barbie-plots. Skipper WAS a ho.

Posted by: tt_marie at November 21, 2008 9:22 AM

I second Ali with the His Dark Materials love. The Golden Compass is one of the great fantasy novels, and though the series falls apart a bit by the end, it will really blow your mind. Way more sophisticated than Harry Potter...And his other books aren't bad young adult mysteries.

Posted by: sarah b at November 21, 2008 9:55 AM

Who mentioned Brian Jacques? Who was it? Redwall was my JAM back in grade school. My secret, never-tell-a-soul, jam. Can someone please confirm that these books exist? I really am certain I read all of them. Are they even well written? I know they introduced me to the idea of multiple narratives and dialects in writing. So he must've done something right. Thoinkee koindly zurrs.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at November 21, 2008 10:26 AM

So... vampires are just a butt-stamp and a mane away from being My Little Ponies, is that what Meyer is saying? Because I can NOT get behind that.

I actually spit coffee across my desk, but I'm not asking for compensation. That sentence was worth the mop up.

I read the first three Twilight books because a friend had done so at the behest of several people and didn't get the appeal. She wanted to know if she was missing something. Mind you, she is my best friend, and I would do anything for her. I may never forgive her, and she apologizes and buys me well-written books in an attempt to make up for it. I am hoping the guilt lasts for years. Then, maybe, the fury and disgust I have for what Meyer has wrought on this world might fade. Fucking manipulative, emotionally unavailable, more than a little cruel guy who stalks you is the perfect boyfriend because he's hot and glittery. No, really?? And your best friend turns out to be the same kind of guy only with fur?? Yeah, no.

As for Harry Potter, I read them all. Once. They were okay. It was the first series my older son got into, and he has continued to read. The problem is that there's fuck all marketed to teenaged boys. My younger son reads all sorts of things and did his book review poster on The Phantom Tollbooth, which he plucked off of my shelf when I wasn't looking. That made me very happy - both the poster and the theft.

I can't fault Rowling for her success. It was a matter of timing. At least she kept her world largely consistent, had more than a passing acquaintance with proper grammar, and told a fairly good tale. Meyer's success is like a metal spike driving into my head, such is the wrongness. The fact that there will now be waves of fan fiction based on her series makes my heart hurt.

Posted by: Reba at November 21, 2008 10:47 AM

Jesus, I didn't realize I'd been in the company of the goth kids from South Park this whole time (they were awesome in this weeks show). I'm convinced that the only reason that so many of the posters on this thread are going so far overboard with their Dan Brown hate is because it was so popular ("i hate conformist. All they do is sit there and act all conformy". Like someone else mentioned, it is pop fiction on par with Grisham, Connelly, or older King (i don't even know what to call King's stuff from that past 15 years). I really enjoyed Angels and Demons (which I read first) and thought Da Vinci Code was simply meh. I didn't throw the book into a urine filled toilet or consider smashing my literitals afterward. Also, I like religious mystery (Indiana Jones). All that shit is fakery anyway so it makes for really good psuedo magical mystery fodder. I call shenanigans on this vitriol. It isn't based on the subject matter so much as the fact that so many crappy people loved it.

Posted by: Handel at November 21, 2008 12:14 PM

I do not understand how anyone can like Twilight. I gave the first book a read a long time ago and I thought I'd read better stories written by fifth graders.

Harry Potter books were good, and they got a lot of kids into reading more I think - so, yay for that. But Twilight is only going to make kids, teens and the general public stupider. Give them all a copy of Madeline L'Engle's 'A Wrinkle in Time', for goodness sakes. Or tell them to skip the 'movies' and read the Narnia series.

Someone mentioned Gordon Korman? LOVE THOSE BOOKS, what! Ah.

Posted by: SofaChip.com at November 21, 2008 12:47 PM

I was trying to explain the Twilight books to my roommate (because, for some reason, she's 23 and had never heard of them) and I said, "It's kind of like freebasing cocaine. You KNOW it's bad for you, but you do it once, because you're curious, and how bad could one time hurt you? And then suddently YOU CAN'T STOP, and it takes over your life and destroys the relationships you care about most because they judge you and tell you that you need help. So ... yeah, it's exactly like freebasing."
Um, for the record, I don't do drugs.

Posted by: lizling at November 21, 2008 1:30 PM

Oh! Oh! And Laurel K Hamilton! I got to explain those to Roomie too! I said "They were really entertaining at first but then they devolved into S&M vampire-werewolf porn. And not even GOOD porn. Like, third-rate S&M vampire-werewolf porn."
Um, for the record, I am not an S&M vampire-werewolf porn connisseur.
It says a lot about how good a person Roomie is that these conversations don't screw up our relationship at all.

Posted by: lizling at November 21, 2008 1:37 PM

Hey, did you forget about Anne Rice and her New Orleans Vampire schitck? Back in the day, I was all about Lestat and Louis -- until Jesus Cruise and Brad What's-His-Name ruined the whole thing for me.

There was great tension and some reasonably safe homoeroticism in the first two books and I devoured them in rapid succession. But then lovely Anne totally lost me with The Queen of the Damned. That book sucked.

Posted by: Adrienne at November 21, 2008 2:30 PM

I can't remember all the things I want to comment about in this thread.

1) Someone else read Trixie Belden! But I don't think anyone mentioned Encyclopedia Brown or Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators.

2) I 83rd the opinion that Harry Potter shouldn't be on this list. How can you back up the assertion that kids are being "pressured" to read them? Also, all children's serial books have a lot of repetition. So do a lot of adult books that are part of a series, including The Dresden Files, which seems to be popular around here.

3) I really enjoyed the first 3 or 4 Jack Ryan books. The plots are great, and I learned to recognize the weapons fetish paragraphs so I could skip over them. But the books get more and more jingoistic as Clancy got older? richer? and by the time Jack is president the series is unreadable. And how did Clancy not get any blame for 9/11 when one of his books (the sum of all fears maybe) has terrorists flying planes into government buildings (congress, if I remember correctly)?

4) Anyone with a child who like to read should get a list of Newbury award winners. It's how I discovered Madeline L'Engle, Judy Blume, Mrs Frisbee and the Rats of NIMH, Phantom Tollbooth, etc.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at November 21, 2008 3:44 PM

Yes, Optimus, there is a Redwall....

I thought they were well written when I read them, which I have to admit was when I was 10 or 12. I always loved the hares myself--wot wot! And the secret codes and quests! And the drama! Those were definitely the kind of books that I hated to see end.

Jacques still writes one every year or so. The cartoon series sucked balls.

Eulaliaaaaaaaaa!

Ahem.

Posted by: frumpiefox at November 21, 2008 10:48 PM

someone up there mentioned getting grief at school for the king books at 9. i had to write a letter to my daughter's school librarian to allow her to check out whatever she wanted because she thought goosebumps were to scary for an eight-year-old.
seriously??
i don't really like a lot of the series my daughter reads, but who cares? she reads. and i slip all of the books i love on her shelve since she'll read anything she gets ahold of

Posted by: courtney 1 at November 22, 2008 12:19 AM

she thought goosebumps were to scary for an eight-year-old.

I dare say that offends my sensibilities! It's your job to restrict if you want to. Media centers might be different but still...I tut!

Posted by: Jay at November 22, 2008 9:58 AM

Sweet Valley High? Really? Those were awesome! One twin was a skinny blond skank but the other was smart and shy. She gave a 9 year old nerd hope.

Glad to see I wasn't the only one who read Scholastic series banned by their parents. To this day I don't think I have told my mom how many Babysitters Club and Sweet Valley books I secretly borrowed from the school library. Or that I have read most of the Harry Potter series. (we're pretty sheltered.)

I think the problem with most of the items on this list is not the books themselves, but the ensuing fandom and spinoffs. Except for the Da Vinci Code. That book blows. As my biblical studies prof remarked last year "Just holding it makes me want to break out in hives." Maybe I should suck it up and read the whole thing, but a chapter alone made me want to scream.

Go ahead, call me a paranoid uptight Catholic. But if a pulp novel slickly opposing your beliefs was embraced by thousands of middle aged house wives, you'd be ticked off too. We're not hiding the Gospel of Thomas, you can buy it at Barnes and Freaking Noble.
Last year at the National Gallery of Art,I sprinted down a hallway just before closing time so I could see the only Leonardo outside of Europe. (Portrait of Genevra de Benci) Sure enough, there was a woman in mom jeans asking the security guard if he had read some Dan Brown. Auughhhhh!

Posted by: Empress of All the Russias at November 22, 2008 1:33 PM

BWeaves, I could kiss you for the WKRP Turkey Drop reference.

Here's a link to the audio: http://radio.about.com/library/blwkrpturkeydropaudio.htm

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at November 22, 2008 2:38 PM

Love you Frumpie. Loved how Redwall Abbey would always have secrets. By the 15th book you'd have to imagine the place is just pure symbols. Just secret doors on secret doors. I imagine if you tried to map out the Abbey using clues from the books it would turn out like the Golden Girls' house.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at November 23, 2008 1:00 AM

Hey manna, if you like McKinley, are annoyed by Twilight-mania, and haven't read it yet, absolutely check out Sunshine.

Which..everyone should anyway, regardless.

And word.

Posted by: Salieri2 at November 23, 2008 6:09 PM

I pretty much agree with you on all counts...and, though I somehow like the Twilight movie in all it's cheesiness, I do agree that the books are ridiculous trype. One thing, though: "vegetarian" vamps aren't exactly a new idea. Anne Rice's Louis didn't drink human blood, either, for the same reason. He just didn't call himself a vegetarian...

Posted by: Chelsea at November 24, 2008 8:33 AM

ONxsCh hi! hooli?

Posted by: hoolio at February 9, 2009 9:52 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.