snakeeyes-movie-1.jpg
The Five Biggest Box-Office Flops of 2009

A Pajiba Prediction / Dustin Rowles

Seriously Random Lists | December 17, 2008 | Comments (37)


Yesterday, we ran down the top 10 grossing film of 2009, so today we look back on the duds of the year. These five films did about as well as Obama’s planned withdrawal of troops from Iraq, which is to say: Like Hillary Clinton’s scandal-tainted stint as Secretary of State and Harry Knowles tumble from the top after a nasty triple bypass, they performed very poorly versus expectations.

2009’s Five Biggest Bombs

5. Avatar ($138 million): You’d think most studios would be pleased with a $138 million opening, but this was James Cameron’s long-awaited, shrouded-in-secrecy sci-fi epic follow-up to Titanic, the biggest box-office hit of all time. Unfortunately, after a 12-year gestation period, Avatar became the film world’s version of Guns n’ Roses Chinese Democracy. It would’ve been a huge groundbreaking film … in 2002. Sadly for Cameron and his decidedly middle-tier cast, the world and Zack Snyder passed him by and Avatar became just another generic sci-fi blockbuster in a marketplace full of them.

4. Dragonball ($16 million): Despite its huge marketing push, and 20th Century Fox’s incredibly lame attempt to virally market Dragonball, the film absolutely tanked at the box-office, debuting with a limp $7 million opening weekend and struggled to top $15 million. The studio apparently severely overestimated the fanboy base for the film. It didn’t hurt that, when most people heard it was based on a popular Japanese manga, they thought the movie was adapted from a soft drink.

3. Where the Wild Things Are ($18 million): Though a huge critical success (85 percent on the Tomatometer), the movie based on the classic and beloved Maurice Sendak children’s book failed to bring in the kids. The film — directed by Spike Jonze and written by Dave Eggers — was simply too dark and sophisticated for younger audiences, many of whom were frightened by the themes and imagery of the film. Sadly, Where the Wild Thing Are represented a huge setback for smart children’s films, proving that the studio formula using big-name stars to voice the flatulent sounds of CGI-rendered animals is still the quickest way to box-office gold.

2. 2012 ($70 million): Though the box-office numbers weren’t incredibly bleak, the production and marketing budget for Roland Emmerich’s disaster film — starring John Cusack and Amanda Peet(e) — absolutely dwarfed the film’s final box-office tally. Still struggling with a recession and the resurgent price of oil, audiences weren’t interested in another end-of-the-world film, and Emmerich’s style and bankability continued to plunge on the heels of the mediocre outings of his previous films, 10,000 B.C., The Patriot and The Day After Tomorrow.

1. GI Joe: Rise of Cobra ($65 million): The problem with G.I. Joe? It was a laughable film, completely awful, though it did become an instant camp classic. The performances — from Channing Tatum, Brendan Fraser, and especially’s Marlon Wayan’s Ripcord — were embarrassing, while the plot was completely non-existent. The film generated a whopping 5 percent on the Tomatometer, and the scant few positive reviews all came from blurb whores. Stephen Sommers — who inexplicably chose this project as his follow-up to Van Helsing — was actually fired from two films he had in production after G.I. Joe was released and Sienna Miller created some controversy when she refused to do press for the film after viewing an early screening.


Ipod Diversion | Ipod Diversion





Comments

Honorable Mention: Madea Goes to Jail: $10.50

Apparently, Pookie really WAS the only person in the theatre. Anyone who had a passing interest in this film merely rented the stageplay DVD through Blockbuster, and kept it to themselves. The dismal grossing of this film lead to Tyler Perry disappearance, and as of this writing authorities are still holding Michael Bay for questioning.

Posted by: Mike R. at December 17, 2008 2:25 PM

I like me some disaster movies, and I'll probably see 2012 even though I hated Independence Day, Day AFter Tomorrow, Godzilla, basically anything Emmerich has laid his ham-fisted hands on. Gi JOE I'll just have to see--I don't care if Sommers made that POS Van Helsing and will likely massacre my childhood's memories with JOE.

Posted by: stryker1121 at December 17, 2008 2:33 PM

If that dude in the leotard up there needs a sword to back up his shoddy gunplay, I suggest then that he remove the shroud from his face, or at least cut some eye holes in there.

I'm honestly not terribly familiar with G.I. Joe. I'm down with Thundercats, though!

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 17, 2008 2:38 PM

I'm enjoying "made up" Pajiba!
I don't think we need real movies anymore.

Posted by: monitorman at December 17, 2008 2:39 PM

It totally bums me out about Where the Wild Things Are...

Because it's true.

Posted by: Kayanne at December 17, 2008 2:41 PM

@ Mike R. Right thinking people the world over hope you are a prophet.

Looking at that description, I'd expect G.I. Joe to be the top grossing film of the year.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at December 17, 2008 2:42 PM

Don't go after Ray Park, dong-lover.

He'll be the only decent thing to watch in that entire thing.

Posted by: twig at December 17, 2008 2:49 PM

Heehee...I love these posts.

Posted by: figgy at December 17, 2008 2:54 PM

Don't go after Ray Park, dong-lover.

He'll be the only decent thing to watch in that entire thing.

Ray Park, you say? Hmmm.... Ray Park... IMDbing... Alright, he's kind of a butterface, but a propos of that smoking fine bod, the dong-lover gives him a pass. Score one for twig.

In fact, I might gently suggest to Mr. Park that he never remove that mask, regardless of how negatively it affects his gun skillz.

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 17, 2008 2:56 PM

"...disaster film -- starring John Cusack and Amanda Peet(e)..."


Think about that...it explains why you NEED a prohibitively expensive, and ultimately doomed marketing scheme.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at December 17, 2008 3:16 PM

Dustin or whoever- when are we going to see a review for Gran Torino?

Posted by: dylanj at December 17, 2008 3:23 PM

Ray Park should have stuck to writing songs.

I remember he was one of the first black artists to venture into the fledgling world of music videos. Several videos of songs from his first album entitled, Raydio, including "Jack & Jill" were released to air on Wolfman Jack's Saturday night television show, The Midnight Special. He really hit it big with the 1984 hit "Ghostbusters", a song that secured him a 1984 Best Pop Instrumental Grammy Award. Unfortunately, a crippling depression and reoccurring drug use spiraled him toward a career in hardcore pornogra...

Wazzat? Ray Parker Jr? Huh. Who the fuck is Ray Park then?

Posted by: Skitz at December 17, 2008 3:42 PM

I suggest then that he remove the shroud from his face, or at least cut some eye holes in there.

That is Snake Eyes, Clee Shay. If you look closely you will see he is wearing a visor thingy over his eyes, rest assured he can see. He is GI Joes silent, personal ninja and his skills are beyond reproach. Just ask Storm Shadow, Cobra's little bitch of a ninja.

So I will thank you to SHUT YOUR FILTHY DONG- LOVING, NINJA HATING MOUTH!

Posted by: admin at December 17, 2008 3:51 PM

Quite. His is also the only both good and correct costume.

It's all so wrong. So completely wrong. I'm gonna have to go cry over that cosplay Baroness whose existence negates all value of Sienna Miller again.

Posted by: Jay at December 17, 2008 3:59 PM

I am ashamed to admit I did not know that Where The Wild Things Are was being put to celluloid. Is it to be live action or CGI or traditional animation? I will definitely be seeing this--especially with the talent involved. Nevertheless I imagine Dustin is right in his prediction.

Between Speed Racer, which mark my words is destined to become a cult classic movie, Where the Wild Things Are, and Lost In Space Hollywood has now completely exhausted my childhood obsessions. Now I'm sure they'll be moving toward yours. I think you'll need something stronger than the MURDERTANK and MURDER ARSENAL to prevent it. Good Luck.

Posted by: Ed Newman at December 17, 2008 4:02 PM

I am ashamed to admit I did not know that Where The Wild Things Are was being put to celluloid. Is it to be live action or CGI or traditional animation?

Live action, and the initial test footage was pretty much everything said about it above - too dark, too weird, exactly what you'd expect from that combination of visionaries.

Either it comes out horrifyingly truncated and rewritten by a team of morons, it comes out quietly as-is, or it never comes out at all. Who knows?

Posted by: twig at December 17, 2008 4:05 PM

So I will thank you to SHUT YOUR FILTHY DONG- LOVING, NINJA HATING MOUTH!


Chillax, admin. I love ninjas. I'm unaware of the use of handguns in the traditional ninja canon, but that's cool. Maybe he's just not a very good swordsman.

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 17, 2008 4:16 PM

BTW Rowles, if Avatar does a $128 million opening it will surely wind up on your top 10 grossing films of 2009. You need to fix something.

Posted by: Ed Newman at December 17, 2008 4:17 PM

GI Joe, further nostalgic bullshit crammed down our throats. What sucks is they're rarely ever faithful to the original source with this shit either.

It still might be more tolerable than Transformers, which instead of being about the robots, was about some horny teenager trying to get his wick wet.

Fucking hollywood shitting all over my awesome Saturday morning cartoons which don't really deserve to be revived or remade into anything. The stories sucked, the voice acting was always over the top or stoic and yet I still love them for what they were. If we ever get sucked into a black hole, I hope Hollywood goes first.

Posted by: The Lulz at December 17, 2008 4:42 PM

Chillax, admin. I love ninjas. I'm unaware of the use of handguns in the traditional ninja canon, but that's cool. Maybe he's just not a very good swordsman.

Clee Shay, just back away, okay? This is not going to end well, trust me.

Posted by: Vermillion at December 17, 2008 4:48 PM

Yeah, the "opening" word is not right there, but the message is intact. Anyway, I hope you're wrong about Avatar. We've waited long enough; James Cameron should be ready to blow our minds.

Your Wild Things prediction sounds quite prescient - at least in terms of audience/critical reaction. I predict a little better than $18 million, however, as there are a ton of parents who loved that book as a kid.

Dragonball? I hope the budget on that isn't too hefty. That indeed is a box-office trainwreck waiting to happen.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 17, 2008 5:12 PM

You're seriously underestimating GI Joe. That's all my 7 yr old wants for Christmas, just like Transformers the Christmas prior to the release of the first film. They have been releasing 25th annivesary updated versions of the toys along with DVDs of the horrible cartoon. He's been eating it up. This kid is a barometer I tell ya.

Posted by: Juice at December 17, 2008 5:18 PM

Clee Shay, just back away, okay? This is not going to end well, trust me.

Oh Vermillion, you're so right. I almost put my foot right in my fool mouth!

Okay, so I would like to apologize to admin for what I said about Snake Eyes. I'm sure he's at least a very talented accupuncturist or something, or G.I. Joe wouldn't keep him around, what with the crappy shooting and all. Maybe he's in charge of making sure that the base camp is arranged according to feng shui philosophy. OH! Or sushi! Maybe he prepares the sushi!

Anyway, admin, you have my sincerest apologies.

XOXO,
Clee

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 17, 2008 5:22 PM


1......2......3......4.......5....*deep breath*

Nope....didn't work.

Clee Shay I am sure you are a very nice person, but please go and make love to yourself in the most uncomfortable way I can imagine. We now have, what is the term...ah yes, beef.

Posted by: admin at December 17, 2008 5:31 PM

Clee Shay I am sure you are a very nice person, but please go and make love to yourself in the most uncomfortable way I can imagine. We now have, what is the term...ah yes, beef.

Hmm. Such a cryptic message. Okay, so I have to suppose that the most uncomfortable way for you to imagine me making love would be in a three-way with your parents on your childhood bed. I'll call them, I guess. See if they're up for it. Don't worry; I'll post the video on RedTube for you.

Then later, sure, we can go get some beef; there's an Outback right across the freeway from your dad's office.

Meetcha there! I'm so glad we're friends now!

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 17, 2008 5:40 PM

Hmm. Such a cryptic message. Okay, so I have to suppose that the most uncomfortable way for you to imagine me making love would be in a three-way with your parents on your childhood bed.

My mother was a pox ridden whore and, from what she tells me, my father was a syphilitic felon on parol for assaulting and old lady with a bottle opener.

My childhood bed was comprised of a urine and vomit soaked chesterfield cushion with too little stuffing. Tell them I said hi and thanks for the memories.

The Outback sounds good though, shall we say 6:30?

Posted by: admin at December 17, 2008 5:58 PM

*grabs some popcorn*

This is getting good!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at December 17, 2008 6:13 PM

Wow, your folks are really nice. And they had such lovely things to say about you. I had no idea you were the first in your family to be born without a tail! That's just wonderful. You should call your mom, though; she's been so worried since you moved out. She feels really bad about leaving your cage open. Don't worry though, I assured her that you're doing as well as can be expected, and that you still love your cartoons!

6:30 is no good for me. Shall we say 7:00?

Cheers!

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 17, 2008 6:31 PM

I'm gonna have to side with my (almost) namesake on this one - cool as Snake Eyes undoubtedly is, and while I have a weakness for both guns and swords, the two together are a little redundant.

That said, I disagree on Ray Park's butterface-ness. Take off the Toad/Maul make-up and he's definitely into weird-hot territory. Plus, can a guy even technically be a butterface?

Posted by: Shay at December 17, 2008 6:37 PM

Plus, can a guy even technically be a butterface?

Hellz yes.

Three words: Daniel Craig.

Posted by: Clee Shay at December 17, 2008 6:39 PM

I meant more in the etymological sense, since (to the best of my knowledge) it comes from "but-her-face", as in "hot body, but her face...". Thus, for guy it'd be "but-his-face", except that just doesn't roll off the tongue so easily, and doesn't look like it should be a word. Don't worry though - no one's disputing the fact that Daniel Craig is an ugly, hot, ugly man.

Posted by: Shay at December 17, 2008 7:15 PM

I'm glad to hear that they are doing well, mom didn't so much leave the cage open as beat me with a rubber hose until I fled the box. I'm quite proud to be the first born without a tail, however, my parents' did come in handy for strangling and holding the tubing while the spoon was cooking.

I hope your health insurance is up to date as after your tryst you will require a significant course of antibiotics in addition to those you already have prescriptions for. By the way has dad progressed to the insanity stage yet? I bet it must be getting expensive what with the operations and all. I really do admire your courage. It can't be easy being a woman trapped in a man's body. I'm glad you are taking the next step.

7:00 doesn't work for me, cartoons are on, (gotta make up for that lost childhood. What say you to 8:00?

Posted by: admin at December 17, 2008 7:23 PM

while I have a weakness for both guns and swords, the two together are a little redundant.

Backup plan.

Posted by: twig at December 17, 2008 8:45 PM

I heard "neck downer" as an equivalent phrase, in that instance to apply to Michael Phelps.

Posted by: Jay at December 17, 2008 10:52 PM

Jay - ...that's just absolutely perfect. Thank you!

twig - eh. A true ninja doesn't need a back-up plan; he's silent and deadly first time around.

Posted by: Shay at December 18, 2008 6:56 PM

Anyone with a sizeable budget doing ANYTHING but escapist fluff if going to struggle over the next 18-24 months given the current climate.
If Bax Luhrmann decides to go back to his roots and do shiny happy musicals (ones about lovable salt-of-the-earth but-down-on-their-luck types looking for some sunshine in the endless rain), he'll be back on the A list in pretty short order. He'd want to because he sure as shit can't do an epic.

Posted by: Dave Shepherd at December 18, 2008 9:27 PM

I think you missed the major number one flop: Valkyrie

Posted by: TheExpatriot at December 20, 2008 6:27 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.