web
counter
 

The 2010 Oscar Winners

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (31)



james-cameron-oscars.jpg

(March 8, 2010) — Another year, another snoozefest. Last night’s Oscar ceremony kicked off with a nice musical number from Neil Patrick Harris and Martin Short and then it slid on its ass for three hours and fell apart. Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin were game in their attempts to prop up the lame awards-show material, but they were somewhat restrained by the fact that a good half of the available jokes were off limits because freakin’ Alec Baldwin was the punchline. This is what happens when you allow the director of The Pacifer, Cheaper by the Dozen 2 and Bringing Down the House to run the show. You get tame Steve Martin 2.0, who lost his comedic fangs at the turn of the century and has been gumming his material ever since. Thanks, Adam Shankman, you flaming turd.

The Oscars themselves were mostly predictable — there have been so many awards shows already, and so many of the same names and movie titles have been recycled among them that it’s not terribly difficult to predict the winners based on previous awards. It was nice to see arguably the favorite, The Hurt Locker, take Best Picture over the biggest grossing movie of all time, Avatar (I still would’ve preferred Up in the Air), though I’d have hoped Kathryn Bigelow would’ve given a better speech and had not been so weirdly gracious to her ex-husband James Cameron, who had won Best Director just minutes before (it was a somewhat rare split for Best Picture and Best Director, but in this case, I actually think it was justified. I didn’t care for Avatar, but I can at least appreciate the effort, time, skill, and talent that Cameron put into it). The Hurt Locker’s win was a fitting anti-climax to a show that never really built up much momentum. Indeed, having 10 Best Picture nominees didn’t so much create more interest as simply drag out the show even more, as all 10 nominees had to have their two-minute video packages, which were each introduced by a different celebrity, which added another 60 seconds — all in all, those Best Picture nominee previews added an extra half-hour onto an already bloated telecast.

Oh, and so much for the idea of allowing the winners give their extended thanks backstage in an effort to cut down on the name-dropping. No one actually took that cue, did they? They never will. And this paradox was never so obvious as in this year’s show: We all want a shorter show, but we all get irritated when the winners are shuffled off-stage mid-speech.

Meanwhile, Christoph Waltz got his deserved Best Supporting Actor Oscar, as expected — he delivered the best acting performance of 2009 in any category, after all. Charming speech, too. He’s a good guy, and I look forward to seeing a lot more of him. MoNique took the award for Best Supporting Actress, and her speech was one of the few highlights of the night, even if it did feel kind of artificial.

It was a slight surprise to see Quentin Tarantino take the Oscar for Best Script, simply because Mark Boal was the favored nominee for The Hurt Locker. Tarantino gave one hell of a self-obsessed speech, but what else do you expect from him? He could’ve at least talked about himself in an entertaining way. Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner won for Best Adapted Screenplay for their Up in the Air, and Reitman was actually gracious enough this time to let Turner speak for a second or two before Reitman cut him off and turned his back to him. No surprise, either, that The White Ribbon took Best Foreign flick, while Up took Best Animated feature. Michael Haneke was just as depressing up on stage as he is in his films. He really does hate everyone.

Jeff Bridges won Best Actor for his role in Crazy Heart and got a standing ovation for simply appearing on stage. He deserved it, too. The Dude is one classy motherfucker, and he gave one classy motherfucking speech. It was only notable because Bridges delivered it, but sometimes, that’s really all you need.

The big surprise of the night, however, was that the Oscars didn’t surprise us at all in the Leading Actress category. I thought for sure they’d tap into their populist streak and pick Sandra Bullock for her role in The Blind Side just to piss off those of us with actual taste in movies. But they appropriately selected Carey Mulligan for her role in An Education, and Mulligan modestly shed an honest tear or two, and then rattled off a list of people she wanted to thank. Figures.

All in all, another lackluster Oscar ceremony, like almost all previous Oscar ceremonies. It’s faintly pathetic when one of the highlights of a show comes from Oscar presenters, although Robert Downey’s bit last night was pretty great, as was the awkward hilarity in seeing the height disparity between Tina Fey and Steve Carrell when they presented together. It’s the small details, people, that keep me going.









The 2010 Academy Award Nominations | The Ten Best Quotes of 2009













Comments

I'm thinking it will be the other way around: Bigelow will win for Best Director and Avatar will take Best Picture.
I don't see Mulligan winning it over Sidibe if it's between the two of them. As long as it's not Sandra Bullock I don't mind who wins.

But I agree on everything else. I'm sensing a dull-as-dishwater show this year. Maybe one of the winners will flash the audience. Anything to liven it up.

Posted by: Brie at March 3, 2010 3:28 PM

I dream of a Meryl victory, mostly because her speeches are better than anything going.

Posted by: coveredinbees at March 3, 2010 3:31 PM

Even though this years Oscars seem pretty predictable in every aspect, for some reason I'm quite excited for them.

Also, on his Twitter, Neil Patrick Harris said he won't be performing with Martin Short at the Oscars; that it was misinformation.
I hope he's lying because I really really want it to happen. Really really really really. That would be amazing.

Posted by: gee. ay. at March 3, 2010 3:33 PM

If Carey Mulligan wins, even though she deserves it, I will eat my shoe. That movie was one of the most overlooked of the year and I don't think that's going to change.

Posted by: michaelceratops at March 3, 2010 3:47 PM

If Avatar wins Best Picture I will cut someone. Seriously. Visually stunning? Yes. And that's where it ended for me. Script? Meh. Plot? Good idea, but cliched in the execution.

Posted by: Jeni at March 3, 2010 3:51 PM

I love movies but awards shows make me want to rev up the Murdertank. I'll just wait and read all about it here rather than going homicidal.

Posted by: lainiefig at March 3, 2010 4:16 PM

Your casual allowance that Cameron deserves something for his most recent accomplishment is appreciated. Directing the highest grossing film of all time, pioneering special effects and putting together a competent (if somewhat over-familiar) movie has to count for something. I will watch "The Hurt Locker" tonight to create a better perspective.

Thank you DVD burner.

Posted by: superasente at March 3, 2010 4:21 PM

Maybe Cameron's Oscar will be made of Unobtainium.

Posted by: UncleJR at March 3, 2010 4:49 PM

I thought the same thi...

HOLY CRAP THEY HAVEN'T EVEN HAPPENED YET! How... How the fucking crapwitch is this possible? HOW?! Lordy Moses, Rowles, how did you... What strange magic did... A time machine? A ripple in the time-space continuum? Did you watch them with yourself? No, that'd be stupid, given that any theory allowing time-travel would require - nay, demand - that... uh. JEEZUM FLOPCAKES, MAN! Christ, the concept of jumping back/forth between different times in a manner analogous to futzing around between different points in space is amazing in itself, but that you had the time to actually watch the Oscars, maintain the 'Jiba, slip in a little snuggle time with your lady, and raise your kid in a topsy-turvy fuckerdoodle of a world like this, is AMAZING! A-M-A-Z-I-N-G! This changes everything, holmes - everything. Listen man, there's a shit-ton of responsibility that comes with this kind of power, and you need to surround yourself with the kind of fella tha -

SCREW YOUSHADOWPRISCOTKADMINTRACERSOCALLEDSMOKINDEISTPOOK!

...anyhow - the kind of guy who's gonna help you make the right decisions when zero-hour comes, y'know? And who better than the coolest one and-a-half motherfuckers around? That's right, yours truly. If this time-travel shit is legit (pleasebetrue) all I need to know before joining you is this:

Did that salve clear up the rash from under my scrotum?

If so, I'll be at your house around nine. Please have an escort and rental car at the ready...

Best,
Skittimus Maximus & Minimus
Time Travelers Extraordinaire

Posted by: Skitz at March 3, 2010 5:13 PM

P.S. Please make sure your icebox is stocked and if you could, make a run to the liquor store. I'll need to pay you back after I collect some of that sweet, sweet, future cash...

Posted by: Skitz at March 3, 2010 5:15 PM

P.P.S. Uh, this is awkward, but you wouldn't happen to have a credit card number I could borrow, do you? Some shit fell through and I'm a little low on cash, so... Don't get me wrong - I know how to make dough at a bus depot, but what with the probation and all, it's probably not best to utilize my God-given oral talent to swa... OH! Nevermind - just saw the bus driver guy hit the pisser - problem solved!

Posted by: Skitz at March 3, 2010 5:21 PM

Yeah,but wasn't it HILARIOUS when Cameron dropped trou and buttplugged himself with ol'baldy right there on the stage?
I mean, we are accustomed to his public self-gratification cinematically, but that seemed a bit uncouth.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at March 3, 2010 5:25 PM

P.P.P.S. Say - sidenote here - do I need to pack light for the future, or is it all naked all the time? If that's the case, I'm going to need to borrow a razor, or if your wife's got one, a home-waxing kit. Gotta go in style, dig? Don't want my downtown briar patch drawing any unwanted attention...

Posted by: Skitz at March 3, 2010 5:25 PM

Skitz, may I offer you a cookie?

Posted by: figgy at March 3, 2010 5:59 PM

They should make the Oscars like the WWF. If someone wants an Oscar that fucking bad, they should have to fight for it. I would totally watch that. Seeing Meryl Streep wrestle Sandra Bullock would be a highlight of my entire life.

I will be impressed when you can predict the Oscar winners 5 years from now. Consider the gauntlet thrown down.

Posted by: Slash at March 3, 2010 6:06 PM

Inglourious Basterds is the favorite in original screenplay right now. With the Weinsteins turning every trick in the book for the best picture win, that screenplay award is the consolation prize.

If Actress splits between Streep and Bullock, I'm pretty sure Sidibe will win, not Mulligan. She's been doing double time campaigning for Precious, even making the radical decision to show up to events she's not paid to attend. She's charming and the film has very passionate fans. Mulligan, on the other hand, is a bit too restrained to be capturing hearts and number one slots.

Hardwick has Director in the bag. If The Hurt Locker and Avatar split, it's the latter for Best Picture.

Posted by: Robert at March 3, 2010 6:18 PM

If Carey Mulligan wins, I will eat michaelceratops's other shoe.

The more time passes, even though I wouldn't be TERRIBLY upset by it, since I really think of these things, now, as just another club into which they bit by bit initiate members they consider worthy, I really REALLY don't want Sandra Bullock to win Best Actress. Simply because... well, she doesn't deserve it for this particular performance over Meryl Streep's performance.

It's that simple. Streep was miraculous and she deserves to win. And if I had a vote, I'd have given it to Streep, end of story.

So if Bullock wins, I'll think, "Well, they wanted to let her into the club and Meryl's already in the club, that's that. Sigh."

But If Meryl wins I will leap straight into the air and shriek for joy, because goddamn, woman, you fucking ROCKED that role.

On the other hand, if Carey Mulligan wins, I will eat michaelceratops's other shoe.

And a couple of hats, to boot.

As for this NONSENSE about Best Director... are you fucking kidding me? Pfffffffffft.

And I predict that Mo'Nique's speech will be BEYOND tiresome, it will be so fucking preachy, and Christoph Waltz's speech will be so OVER-THE-TOP whimsical that GNOMES might actually appear and do a dance to get him off the stage.

And an INORDINATE number of people will fail to heed my yearly warning not to read us off a fucking LAUNDRY LIST of names they just HAVE to fucking thank, never mind NOBODY CARES.

Again.

But we'll all watch it to the bitter end. Just you wait and see.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at March 3, 2010 6:27 PM

Watching Carey Mulligan in An Education, felt like watching a star be born. That sentence is so awkward, but whatever... I will be giddy with excitement if she wins.

And I'm already pissed that Shutter Island will get shut out of next year's Oscars because of its unfortunate release date. Speaking of powerful female performances, Michelle Williams floored me in her last scene. Wow.

Posted by: Mac at March 3, 2010 7:57 PM

Did somebody say Robert Downey, Jr.?

*sighs dreamily*

Posted by: Jelinas at March 3, 2010 8:21 PM

Avatar deserves an Oscar for best visual effects.

Period.

Not for best picture, not for best editing, and not for best director.

I will grant you it broke new ground in visual effect technology and was amazing to look at. But if you take that much away from it, the movie was mediocre at best when looking at it as a collective whole. The script contained a story that was cliched and unoriginal with dialogue that was at moments laughable (which is customary for a Cameron authored script), the acting wasn't anything outstanding, it was overlong and boring once the initial shock of the effects wore off, and could not stand on its own merits without the effects propping it up.

This was a movie built strictly as a vehicle for the effects and not the other way around. Effects should be used to enhance and improve the story already there. In cooking terms effects are the condiments. And like many movies before it, Cameron offered up a plate of spices and sauces; tingly and flavorful to the pallet but in all honestly leaving the viewer feeling empty and unsatisfied as there was little meat.

I wish more people would've been more honest with themselves. They went to be wowed by the style over substance. It has happened before and will happen again. But never before has the prospect of a visual vehicle been given the prospect of so many undeserving accolades. A movie that wins Best Picture should do so because people truly believe all the basic elements (script, acting, directing, editing, effects, art, costumes...etc.) were not only all done well, but that they all came together and worked well too.

And yes, as has been said in here many occasions Best Picture winners are often undeserving or at least edging one that was more so. This would be another one of those times if Cameron would be awarded either/or Best Director or Best Picture.

Posted by: bleujayone at March 3, 2010 8:23 PM

bleujayone:

Thank you.

So much.

Posted by: ChristianH at March 3, 2010 9:55 PM

bleujayone:

I love you. I really couldn't have said it better myself. If Avatar wins Picture and/or Cameron wins Director I will join Jeni in the cutting.

Posted by: Myrmidon16 at March 3, 2010 10:25 PM

bleujayone: i completely agree

but still,you'd have to concede that it has been a mediocre year for film.I don't see the value in precious,for all ofits cheap sentiments and screamy,loud characters.You play a crazy black woman ,shy downtrodden black teenager,and people go crazy,despite how one-dimensional the character is.

I'd say the real winners are Carrey Mulligan (she is just LUMINOUS in an education) and Penelope Cryz in NINE (a somewhat tepid,slow movie,but she was all kinds of hilarious and emotional there),and of course UP!

Inglorious wouldn't even be in my Top 5 Tarantino films,so I really don't think it deserves a win.Hurt Locker,a film I've tried to watch 5 times.Can't bear it.Lifeless.

Again,in a year of mediocre films even the so-so ones get through.

Posted by: unevan at March 3, 2010 11:41 PM

I'm rather ambivalent about the whole affair - I don't particularly care what film wins what. I understand the importance of the Oscar ceremonies as a celebration of the films from the previous year but I also realize that if a film that I like does not win an award, it does not take anything away from its overall quality nor does it mean that the winner of the award is substantially better.

that said, I have to say something about Avatar ... I find that a lot of the criticisms levelled against it can be applied to the other films that people are (rightfully, in my opinion) praising.

the following rant contains spoilers, so beware ...

Hurt Locker? I love that film and it's my favourite film from last year ... but I recognize the fact that its plot is rather thin. I remember reading a comment on this site suggesting that it was a collection of really tense moments but nothing more and while I disagree, I understand why someone would feel that way ... but that would be ignoring a lot about the film ...

An Education? great performances and enjoyable, but original? was there any doubt how Jenny's and David's relationship would end up? the story of a young woman getting involved with a man who isn't exactly what he appears to be has been done before ... and that's alright. again, the film is more than just about that.

District 9? I enjoyed it more than Avatar ... that said, it's funny when people compare the two. The bad guys in this film were bad and even more one-dimensional and comical than the antagonist in Avatar. the military guy gleefully remarking that he loves his job because it involves killing prawns and the quasi-cannibalistic gang leader who's main concern is eating the protagonist's arm ... factor in the military heads and those evil MNU scientists performing experiments on the aliens ... and the sudden reversal of the protagonist at the end felt forced ... and people complained that the main character in Avatar not having any problems betraying and killing humans ... again, this does not mean that the film was bad or boring (in fact, it's the opposite) ... if I were to judge the film on those points alone, I would be ignoring the fact that it was meant to frame a societal problem in a science-fiction context as honestly as possible and it succeeded in doing that

Inglourious Basterds? I enjoyed this film immensely and I think it's better than Pulp Fiction but there were plenty of times this film could have been about so much more (Frederick Zoller, the brave German officer, etc ...) but it retreated from examining those points in greater depth ...

Up? ... actually, I have no complaints about Up ... I take back what I said earlier, Up is my favourite film of 2010 ... well, maybe the fact that Charles Muntz survived for so long ... but if you accept the fact that he was able to train a pack of dogs and fitted them with collars that allowed them to talk while isolated from humanity and that an old man can travel to South America using kiddie balloons, then that point doesn't seem that important (it still nags though)

I haven't seen the other films to comment on them ... so I won't.

this does not invalidate any criticisms of Avatar ... in fact, I agree with some of them ... but if we really are to be honest with ourselves, we have to apply the same standards to other films. and yes, this does not make Avatar equal in quality to these films, but I think dismissing it as just a technical achievement is a narrow way of looking at it ...

I could argue that Anna Karenina is a clichéd story about adultery with flowery prose that doesn't amount to much therefore Tolstoy is not on the same level as Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov but I won't ... because it's wrong.

Posted by: lelnguye at March 4, 2010 3:40 AM

For the record: I have now seen "The Hurt Locker," and I see what the fuss is about. It's a tense, engaging film with real snippets of humanity. Kathryn Bigelow SOMEHOW makes you feel as if YOU might blow up while watching the movie, which is really nothing more than a character study.

There is an interesting couple of questions that are presented towards the end of that movie, which will stick with me for a while, and which I don't think I'll ever answer. 1st, he says to his partner, "Do you know why I am the way I am?" In the whole movie, I wasn't blown away with the main actor's (his name escapes me) performance. I thought it was...hmph...needlessly cocky. I thought it was predictable. But in this moment, he struck a cord. He seemed so lost and real, it almost retroactively brought strength to the rest of the movie -- it made me think that maybe it wasn't the actor who was pretending poorly, but the character. This question, "Who am I?" is such a strong way to finish, especially after having just spent two hours examining that exact thing.

Next, when he spends brief moments at home and he is speaking to his son. He tell his son (really himself) that he only loves one thing. I think in the moment we're supposed to infer that he is speaking about his son, but considering he immediately goes back to war, assuming his role as a warrior, I don't know if his son is the one thing after all. I won't go as far to say it's the army or war -- or something along those lines. All I'll say is that it's another powerful question.

So listen; I've done a lot to defend Avatar around here. I am not immune to the effects of a changed mind -- and while I will not go as far to say that Cameron deserves whatever award he's sure to win, I will stand by the argument that his nominations at least are well-deserved.

The fact of the matter is that "The Hurt Locker" was just a better film all around than "Avatar."

Posted by: superasente at March 4, 2010 7:26 AM

I think NPH said on his Twitter that the musical number with Martin Short got cut. He also (jokingly) mentioned taking over mid-show, Kanye style. I would approve.
Also, if Avatar wins Best Picture, I am going to throw a brick through the television. Which will be bad, as I will be in a hotel in Florida and cannot pay for a new one.

Posted by: Kevin at March 4, 2010 11:19 AM

OK, we all know that Meryl Streep is amazing. Yes, she's fabulous. But does she have to get nominated every year? She's been nominated 16 times! And won twice. We love you Meryl! But let's get some fresh faces in here. I love Gabourey Sidibe and Carey Mulligan for this. Sandra Bullock's nomination is a joke.

I feel very strongly that District 9 should win best picture. There was no other movie that I loved as much as District 9. Yes, all the others were very good, but this one was fantastic! Sigh, I know it won't win.

Posted by: Scully at March 4, 2010 11:41 AM

@Dustin - this may be too late for you to notice, and totally random, but I saw you used the term "flaming turd". You don't happen to listen to Pierre Robert on WMMR in Philly? He called Axel Rose a flaming turd a year or so ago, and they use the audio of that as a drop every once in a while on the WMMR morning show.
I just love hearing in my head "he's a flaming turd!" So thanks!

Posted by: Katie at March 4, 2010 2:38 PM

Maryscott: I just wanted to agree with you on your post about Mo'nique. Her speeches are so preachy and annoying. I can't stand how she calls everyone baby and sweetheart...

We must be the only ones who see this though because after her wins I always check the blogs and everyone is praising her speeches....ugh!

Posted by: Lynsey at March 7, 2010 9:26 AM

Very interesting, but you should check this:
htpp://www.softinet.org
Got some very cool stuff in it

Posted by: sensation rules at March 8, 2010 8:37 AM

How could you expect Bullock not to win this?

I've read some comments about how "Hurt Locker" won just because it was made by a woman. Made by Ridley Scott it would have been just forgotten.
I don't have a problem with the comment itself except when they say "avatar" is going to be still a huge deal in the future. It will not. Have you seen the iceberg in Titanic these days? It looks so cheesy and the same thing happens with every F/x based movie. This won't be an exception.

I kinda liked Hurt locker..but I think it's going to be like "requiem for a dream". I can't imagine myself watching the whole movie over and over again.

Posted by: james at March 8, 2010 1:51 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time