web
counter
 

The 20 Most Laughable Golden Globe Nominations of the Last Decade

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (35)



Client-List-jennifer-love-hewitt.jpg

Motion Picture Nominations

10. Sandra Bullock, The Proposal — Best Actress, Musical or Comedy (2009)

9. The Tourist — Best Musical or Comedy (2010)

8. The Producers — Best Musical or Comedy (2005)

7. Hugh Jackman, Kate & Leopold — Best Actor, Musical or Comedy (2001)

6. Sarah Jessica Parker, The Family Stone — Best Actress, Musical or Comedy (2005)

5. Nancy Meyers, It’s Complicated — Best Screenplay (2009)

4. Richard Curtis, Love, Actually — Best Screenplay (2003)

3. Bobby — Best Drama (2006)

2. Burlesque — Best Musical or Comedy (2010)

1. Jim Carrey, The Grinch Who Stole Christmas — Best Actor, Musical or Comedy (2000)


Television Nominations

10. CSI — Best Drama Series (2000 - 2001)

9. Anna Paquin, “True Blood” — Best Actress, Drama (2009)

8. Piper Perabo, “Covert Affairs — Best Actress, Drama (2010)

7. Patrick Dempsey, “Grey’s Anatomy — Best Supporting Actor (2005)

6. Reba McEntire, “Reba — Best Actress, Comedy (2003)

5. Charlie Sheen, “Two and a Half Men — Best Actor, Comedy (2004-2005)

4. Lea Michelle, “Glee” — — Best Supporting Actress (2009), Best Actress, Comedy (2010)

3. Wentworth Miller, “Prison Break — Best Actor, Drama (2005)

2. Jessica Alba, “Dark Angel — Best Actress, Drama (2000)

1. Jennifer Love Hewitt, “The Client List” — Best Actress, Mini-Series (2010)










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The 10 Most Popular YouTube Videos of 2010 | Pajiba Love 12/14/10 | F*cking Spiders... Who Even Likes Spiders?









Comments

I always thought Jessica Alba's boobs did a great job in Dark Angel and even more so when she revealed they were adlibbing the whole time.

Posted by: clocker at December 14, 2010 11:33 AM

I pat myself on the back for intentionally skipping nine of the ten films mentioned under the Motion Picture Nominations list. Unfortunately, I couldn't be saved from all, as I sat through the entirety of The Family Stone which even Rachel McAdams was not powerful enough to salvage. SJP was easily the worst ingredient of that shitpizza of a movie.

Posted by: sars at December 14, 2010 11:35 AM

Unless "Love, Actually" was nominated for most painful dialogue in an overstuffed, flaccid, forced, pile of steaming celluloid dung, then it was erroneously nominated, actually.

Full disclosure: I think The Vicar of Dibley is genius writing, actually. So clearly my bias is in favor of Richard Curtis, who when writing Love, Actually must have been ill, actually, or in the middle of a diabetic siezure, actually, because damn, that was Lame, Actually.

Posted by: klingonfree at December 14, 2010 11:38 AM

I think I laughed hardest at the nom for The Producers. They must have been hard pressed for nominations that year, huh?

Posted by: figgy at December 14, 2010 11:39 AM

One more thing: Charlie Sheen is not funny and neither is that show that he's in that apparently will not die.

Posted by: klingonfree at December 14, 2010 11:43 AM

The Fug Girls wrote a screamingly funny recap of Jennifer Love Hewitt's The Client List. Check it out:

http://gofugyourself.com/fug_the_fromage_the_client_list_080310-08-2010

I think the world might be a better place if we all had to face a Dashboard Angel of Judgement.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 14, 2010 11:47 AM

I loved The Producers. No, I'm not referencing the original (same applies). I'm referring to the Nathan Lane foghorn-mode adaptation of the Broadway show. How can you hate Will Ferrel's "Der Geuten Tag Hop-Glop?" It was brilliant. Screw the haters, I still give Nathan Lane my Best Actor prize that year. I didn't think he could improve upon his stage performance of "Betrayed" and he did. It's a farce, people. You were supposed to laugh at the staging, the choreography, the costumes, the sets, the performances, and the script. Calling the whole thing laughable is a compliment as that was the intent of the film.

However, I freely admit that Mamma Mia! and Hairspray were pure cinematic garbage and a sign that American Musical Theater will never return to the heyday of the Golden Age. I've come to piece with that. It's why revivals exist and re-releases of the classics are issued on occasion.

Posted by: Robert at December 14, 2010 11:49 AM

Isn't the Hollywood Foreign Press the group that will dole out nominations for a cold Hot Pocket and a pack of smokes? Maybe these nominees just know their brand.

Posted by: jM at December 14, 2010 12:16 PM

@Robert, I loved the Broadway production of The Producers. It was sublime. The movie is pure trash. It stomps on the memory of that brilliant staging. Nathan Lane sleepwalks through it as you, who presumably saw his masterful and award-winning turn on stage, ought to know. Broderick similarly phones it in, and neither translate to the screen in their roles. Will Ferrell as Franz Liebkind is a contemptable bit of shoehorned stunt-casting that blew up in the film's face like a novelty cigar.

That movie was like watching a loved one die before your eyes. Painfully unfunny, sloppily executed and shockingly uninspired in comparison with it's unprecedented dominance on Broadway (it singlehandedly lifted the industry out of post-9/11 crash.) A transparently opportunistic cash-grab made with minimal effort. I saw it at the Ziegfeld Theatre in New York along with probably the most sympathetic audience you were likely to find in America. It was roundly panned there, as it was in the press.

Hairspray, on the other hand, was a top notch adaptation. Full of the same effervescent verve, energy and idealism as the stage version, and incorporating stunt casting (Travolta, Walken, Latifah...basically the entire cast) that, suprisingly, works wonderfully. Not for everyone, but a faithful and effective adaptation.

We can agree wholeheartedly on Mamma Mia! though... what a catastrophe that was.

Posted by: Martin at December 14, 2010 12:33 PM

Okay just because a movie's plot is laughable and the dialogue is a joke, it does not mean the movie was intended to be a Comedy or Musical. Yeah I'm looking at anyone who approved of "The Tourist" for nomination.

And by the way, why the frig are comedies and musicals lumped into the same category? Not all musicals have comedy within and quite frankly one can go many years without ever seeing one produced. So how come comedies have to shoulder them in their column? The musical has gone from a regular genre to a novelty one. Musicals in recent years have proven if they are made they all but get an automatic nomination simply because they are the only ones to be nominated. "Burlesque" gets nominated because...well...what else is there? And even if there were more, one still not explain why the two need be lumped in together.

That's like a category listed as "Best Western or Drama". Or "Best Horror or Animated" The two are not mutually connected. Either have a category for musicals only or just have them listed as a plain movie- neither drama nor comedy. Sci-Fis do not get their own category (and there are far more of those made every year) so why should this niche genre get a duplex with Comedy?

Posted by: bleujayone at December 14, 2010 12:37 PM

Okay, Mrs. Julien, I just read the FugGirls review of JLH's movie and I'm laughing to much to say anything but THANKS!!! That was golden!!

Posted by: mslewis at December 14, 2010 12:42 PM

Burlesque!?!? Really? How in the fnck did that steaming turd get nominated? Do they pay any attention to the film at all, or do they just pay attention to the hype?

More personal validation for not paying any attention at all to movies or hype.

Posted by: litmus0001 at December 14, 2010 12:45 PM

mslewis - Look up Paula Abdul and find the one where she has on suspenders. All I can remember is "because rainbows taste like cookies".

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 14, 2010 1:11 PM

I was going to make a crack about it being impossible for there to be MOST laughable nominations, but some of those truly are astounding. Jessica fucking Alba? Seriously?!

Posted by: Todd at December 14, 2010 1:12 PM

Hey! there was nothing wrong with Hugh Jackman's performance in Kate & Leopold. Dude was spot-on.

and yes, fuck you for judging me.

But the rest of them i can agree with. I'm sure the only reason that most of these 'things' where nominated is to get some starpower. I mean, seriously, The Tourist? i liked it, but Golden Globe worthy?

and fuck you again for judging me.

Posted by: Derreck at December 14, 2010 1:13 PM

Martin, Hairspray was a well-thought out adaptation of the Broadway show marred by horrific casting. By horrific casting, I mean John Travolta playing a special needs Midwestern housewife with multiple speech impediments.

I don't think Lane sleep-walked through the film. I think Stroman pushed him away from the meta-theatrical nuances of the Broadway production and pushed him towards a more film-friendly Golden Age musical comedy performance. If anyone was drifting through the film, it was Matthew Broderick, who seemed to think only showing signs of neurosis while having a panic attack on screen was the way to handle the transition to film. Those scenes were the bad kind of laughable. I accept that the film is very polarizing and I firmly stand on the "excellent" side of the argument.

Posted by: Robert at December 14, 2010 1:15 PM

Shouldn't we have shot a starter's pistol before beginning the annual "The Golden Globes Have No Artistic Integrity Discussion"? It dovetails so nicely with the "Why Are These Movies Nominated For Oscars They Didn't Make Any Money?" blithering which will take over much of the media in the new year. Of course, all this leads to the annual "Was Jesus Real?" issue from the news magazines and then People's spring favourite "Hollywood Baby Boom" articles that are amazed to discover humans procreating.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 14, 2010 1:37 PM

The Producers was just so LIFELESS. It was just a terrible adaptation and I want to forget all about it.

Also, like someone up there mentioned: they nominated The Tourist because they want Jolie and Depp there to draw in viewers. Hopefully they'll both think it's too far below them to attend, but I wouldn't put it past the Jolie-Pitt hunger for fame.

Posted by: figgy at December 14, 2010 2:08 PM

Hugh Jackman actually made me believe that Leo actually fell in love with Meg Ryan's Kate. That man deserves every medal they have. For shame Dustin, for shame.

Posted by: Hayden Tompkins at December 14, 2010 2:36 PM

Derrek I liked Kate & Leopold too, but Hugh Jackman has a wonderful narcotic effect on me. No judgement here.

I'll take it one step further. I OWN that movie. Got it for free, but I still picked it. And I own Someone Like You. On VHS.

Posted by: Sara H at December 14, 2010 3:03 PM

What no rainbow killer? Wasn't she nominated for a ggg while in Grey's Anatomy?

Posted by: Zahara at December 14, 2010 3:44 PM

I concur with Derrek and Hayden and Sara H-back off on Hugh-unless he was nominated for "Van Helsing", which sucked the mighty suck.

Posted by: lil_a at December 14, 2010 5:45 PM

I would have nominated Jessica Alba for best everything in 2000, of course I was a teenager at the time.

Posted by: Sage at December 14, 2010 6:48 PM


i think the dumbest nomination this year is " the kids
are alright ". it was a fine film but how in the world does
it fall in the musical/comedy category. where were the
funny parts? the bening-moore relationship is torn to shreds
and ruffalo winds up an unhappy basket case.

and just to prove these awards are worthless, " winter's bone "
doesn't get a nomination.

Posted by: snake at December 15, 2010 12:26 AM

Um. Jim Carrey is the man and therefore I am very confused as why he's number 1 when Johnny Depp was nominated this year for ALICE IN WONDERLAND and doesn't make the list.

Also, screw you. Jessica Alba was hot and awesome in 2000 and Dark Angel was a great show it's first season. That being said, it's laughable in hindsight I guess...

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at December 15, 2010 1:34 AM

Jessica Alba - Dark Angel?!??!??!??!??!?!

Posted by: Sarah Barkai at December 15, 2010 4:04 AM

AGREED AGREED AGREED.

Posted by: Shobhna at December 15, 2010 5:53 AM

Love Actually: Best Christmas movie ever. Fact.

Posted by: Kristine at December 15, 2010 6:46 AM

I ♥ Kristine.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 15, 2010 10:24 AM

Oh no!. Here's the annual major falling out between me and Mrs. Julien.
We agree on just about everything throughout the year and then every Decemeber someone mentions Love Actually. It's a pile of crap people. It's so awful I once chose a Lifetime "Men Are Evil" movie over it when I was down with the flu and would have watched anything to get my mind off of the aches in my body.
It used to be just downright terrible but now watching Liam Neeson play a widowed dad of a young kid in a supposed comedy, it's uncomfortable.

Posted by: PaddyDog at December 15, 2010 10:37 AM

I am compelled to contribute (again) my snorts of derision for Lame, Actually. When that nebbish guy holds up the sign to Kiery Ubiquitous that says You Are Perfect or something like that I just about barfed. Barfed, I tell you.

The kids come to the door and demand that the Prime Minister sing a carol. And, being Hugh Grant in an unlikely movie, he does. O spare me.

That one guy looked awesome in his undies, (honestly...meow!) but even that was not enough to sustain shallow little me through this dreck.

That said, I heart PaddyDog. And usually, yes, Mrs. J and I seem to be on le same page. But not today.

Posted by: klingonfree at December 15, 2010 1:14 PM

We are united in our lonely stance, Klingonfree.

How about the guy who goes to the frozen (and statistically obese) mid-west town of Milwaukee in December and it's full of thin blondes walking around in shorts and skimpy t-shirts?

Or the prime minister falling for a Chav?

Or the guy who works for the NGO living in a gorgeous house in a fabulous London neighborhood?

Or the fact that we're supposed to believe Laura Linney's character can't have a successful date because her brother calls her and she can't just explain to the guy that the brother is mentally ill?

Last year, TK accused those who don't like Love Actually of having a burnt kernel of popcorn for a heart. So take your burnt kernel and have it join mine over here in cynic's corner. We can stay warm by laughing at those who like this piece of idiocy.

Posted by: PaddyDog at December 15, 2010 1:40 PM

Ohhh I love party!

OK, ok! How about the little kid (Neeson's) who talks and acts like a little adult? When will writers figure out that kids do not talk like little adults?

Or the little pop star the kid falls for (yawn)...she's so, uh, precocious that I was uncomfortable. And I'm a chick!

I can't even approach the porn star stand ins. Just...(insert inappropriate impotent-humor reference...oh, I just did! I love me!)

So I have a burnt kernel for a heart. That explains so so much.

Posted by: klingonfree at December 15, 2010 1:48 PM

1. (And not just trying to back-pedal to make PaddyDog love me again.) My favourite is The Muppet Christmas Carol, actually, followed by How the Grinch Stole Christmas.

2. Emma Thompson is sublime. She does more actressin' in 30 seconds and without words than most starlets do all Lifetime.

3. I think it is a pleasant meditation on the different kinds of love.

4. I'll give you the Neeson thing. That timeline is beyond wacky. I'll even give you that turning down Roderigo Santoro is an act of madness greater than anything Laura Linney's brother does.

5. I love burnt popcorn. I intentionally burn mine a little bit when making it (on the stove because I am old school). Then I sprinkle it with some of the Kernels Salt and Vinegar powder that I make the Canadians bring whenever they come to visit me.

6. And everyone should love it because it is heaven.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 15, 2010 2:52 PM

I could never hate you Mrs. J. I just don't understand how you could like Love Actually when you clearly have otherwise impeccable taste in Christmas Holiday movies. It's a mystery to me.

Klingonfree:

How about when the kid in a post-9/11 world jumps Heathrow security and runs all the way to the gate and everybody thinks it's adorable. This is the same city where they killed a random Brazilian dude for jumping the tube turnstile. Kid should have been gunned down before he even made it past duty-free.

Posted by: PaddyDog at December 15, 2010 4:29 PM