web
counter
 

The 10 Wealthiest Male Entertainers List Provides the Perfect Tea Party Argument for Raising Taxes on the Rich

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (69)



File-Signs_of_Madi.jpg

This year, Forbes is squeezing all they can out of the Richest Celebrities Alive pieces, having separated them into the highest paid film actors, the highest paid television actors, and now the highest paid entertainers (there is some crossover).

But what’s more fascinating about this list is what a neat little weapon it could be used to convince your typical Tea Party Republicans into supporting a hike on the tax rates of the wealthiest Americans. Think about it this way: There are two kind of Republicans, the sane rational type that prefer to put their own economic interests ahead of society’s and the batshit Tea Party with its racist and homophobic undercurrents, and its apparent belief that people who don’t pay for their own health insurance deserve to die.

But what if you tell Tea Party that, by refusing to raise the tax rates on the top one percent of the wealthiest Americans, you’re essentially allowing two black men, two Jews, two foreigners, a gay, a hippy do-gooder, and a degenerate shock jock to maintain more of their wealth, which they will no doubt use to spread more lies about the existence of the Holocaust, bankroll gang warfare, abort more fetuses, and convert more of the nation’s youth into homosexuals. Just think about it this way: If you raise the tax rates 6 percent on just these 10 individuals, that’s an extra $55 million that the Republicans can spend on abstinence education, missile defense and that goddamn wall they want to erect to keep the foreigners out. Or think about all the executions you could perform with $55 million!

So whaddya say, Tea Partiers? Let’s tax these fuckers! Let’s diminish their abilities to spread their liberal propaganda!

1. Tyler Perry: $130 million

2. Jerry Bruckheimer: $113 million

3. Steven Spielberg: $107 million

4. Elton John: $100 million

5. Simon Cowell: $90 million

6. James Patterson: $84 million

7. Dr. Phil McGraw: $80 million

8. Leonardo DiCaprio: $77 million

9. Howard Stern: $76 million

10. Tiger Woods: $75 million









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"Every one of you is the leader": The Anabasis | No, F*ck You: 15 of Pop Culture's Best Animated Middle Fingers









Comments

Simon and Elton ain't American, so America taxing them wouldn't work.

Also, does JK Rowling not count as an Entertainer? Seeing as you're not discriminating based on nationalities, she'd be right up there

Posted by: cockroach at September 14, 2011 4:13 PM

There's no point in raising taxes if you don't cut spending. The government seizing the entire net worth of all that you mentioned, plus everyone else whose income exceeds one million dollars, would be but a drop in the vast ocean that is our national debt.

That also doesn't change the fact that the Big O wants to raise taxes on those earning $200,000 a year...Something I seem to remember him campaigning against doing...but then, they guy made so many promises that he hasn't kept, who's keeping count?

Posted by: Some Guy at September 14, 2011 4:31 PM

What, no Oprah?

Posted by: Phibbsy at September 14, 2011 4:34 PM

It's amusing that anybody thinks logic or reason has any traction with people who claim to belong to the "Tea Party."

They're a bunch of nutjobs. "9/11 was a government conspiracy" nutjobs. And the ones who aren't nutjobs (the few) are old people who yell at clouds.

Posted by: Slash at September 14, 2011 4:43 PM

Those clouds had it coming!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at September 14, 2011 4:46 PM

I'm on the road now Rowles, but as soon as I get home I'll give you my thoughts.

Posted by: Pookie at September 14, 2011 4:47 PM

What I love about liberals is the belief that ad hominen attacks and calling people with different viewpoints racist, insane, etc. is intelligent, persuasive argument. It really is just impotent, childish rage that people exist who don't succomb to the socialist/liberal worldview that gov't must be worshipped.

But, by all means, let's propose a bill that would tax all actors/musicians/athletes' incomes at 75% and I will support it, just to show you there is ability/room to compromise.

Posted by: Kerminy at September 14, 2011 5:05 PM

I'm on the road now Rowles, but as soon as I get home I'll give you my thoughts.

This comment is like the sound of a wolf howling off in the distance.

Posted by: superasente at September 14, 2011 5:12 PM

Ohh, and the idea that the list is a "neat little weapon" of course assumes that the average american who is against tax increases has no idea that entertainers such as Steven Speilberg make tens of millions of dollars.

Now, even considering how uneducated and ignorant anyone who disagrees with you must be, I don't think even you believe the average person doesn't know that celebrities make millions. so, how you believe this list will change anyone's mind is a mystery.

Posted by: Kerminy at September 14, 2011 5:12 PM

Uhh, Kerminy, this is embarrassing for you, but I think you left your sense of humor in your other shorts.

Posted by: noodlestein at September 14, 2011 5:14 PM

Kerminy when you die I hope your god has a sense of humor.

Posted by: Pookie at September 14, 2011 5:19 PM

I don't want to start any blasphemous rumours, but I think that God's got a sick sense of humour and when I die, I expect to find him laughing.

Posted by: MM at September 14, 2011 5:39 PM

I know, aren't they terrible? They make sweeping generalizations about people they know nothing about, they cling to unverified beliefs, they think people who think differently from them are stupid or crazy, I mean it's just . . . oh wait.

Posted by: Uncle Mikey at September 14, 2011 6:12 PM

Godammit Rowles. You finally felt confident letting your manifesto go public and it was torn apart in two seconds by the perspicacious Kerminy.
What were you thinking? That no-one here had any analytic faculties? That we would assume it was just a fun piece to close out the day with a not so seriously random list and a little political jibe on the side?
We're on to you.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 14, 2011 6:20 PM

Is there some kind of online tea bagger alert that notifies the herd that there's a website they need to go troll?

Posted by: snapnhiss at September 14, 2011 6:42 PM

Snapnhiss, the only troll here is Rowles.

Posted by: Greedy at September 14, 2011 6:45 PM

Tiger STILL made 75 million? How? All his endorsements left with his squeaky clean image. His golf game left with that 7 iron his wife beat him with. So how did he make 75 mill?

Posted by: logan at September 14, 2011 7:14 PM


I'm on the road now Rowles, but as soon as I get home I'll give you my thoughts.
Posted by: Pookie at September 14, 2011 4:47 PM

This comment is like the sound of a wolf howling off in the distance.
Posted by: superasente at September 14, 2011 5:12 PM

I can't stop giggling.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at September 14, 2011 7:27 PM

When the "Tea Party" stops attracting nutjobs and old people who yell nonsensical shit at "town hall meetings" or just yell nonsensical shit wherever, I'll stop calling its adherents nutjobs and unhinged old people. Also, it would help if it would stop calling itself the Tea Party.

They shoulda just stuck with "John Birch Society."

Posted by: Slash at September 14, 2011 7:31 PM

You might as well say Tyler Perry is gay while you are going for it. I mean he clearly is. We saw that one hundred percent real life autobiographical portrayal of him on the Boondocks didn't we?

Posted by: googergieger at September 14, 2011 7:42 PM

And I am totally coming back here for Pookie's thoughts. That shit is gonna be epic. One way or another. It says something that I'm not sure which way Pookie's gonna go on that. I get the sense that he is generally Democratic rather than Republican, but other than that, who knows?

He's a riddle wrapped in an enigma dipped in awesome, then deep fried to a golden brown, with don't-give-a-fuck-what-anyone-thinks dipping sauce.

Posted by: Slash at September 14, 2011 7:42 PM

i'm a right wing nutjob and i'm proud of it i wish Glenn Beck would adopt me.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at September 14, 2011 7:52 PM

i'm a right wing nutjob and i'm proud of it i wish Glenn Beck would adopt me.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at September 14, 2011 7:52 PM

You know, this whole fight over who is a "socialist/communist" or not is quite funny when watched from afar. Given that the Democratic Party is politically about as left as European conservatives, most of those who yell these things do not know what they mean.

Maybe you'd have to live part of your life in the shadow of real socialist states, talk with "proper" socialists or read their stuff to really be able to know when you deal with one. But I think applying common sense would help.

Oh and Kerminy: You should stop complaining about name-calling if you are doing the samenin the same fucking post. I'm not a native English speaker, but I think that's called hypocrisy.

Posted by: FabMax at September 14, 2011 7:52 PM

i'm a right wing nutjob and i'm proud of it i wish Glenn Beck would adopt me.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at September 14, 2011 7:53 PM

i'm a right wing nutjob and i'm proud of it i wish Glenn Beck would adopt me.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at September 14, 2011 7:53 PM

i'm a right wing nutjob and i'm proud of it i wish Glenn Beck would adopt me.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at September 14, 2011 7:54 PM

Point proven, Utah.

Posted by: Riles at September 14, 2011 8:17 PM

I too am a right-wing excentric who has not a home in which to rest, and also hopes beyond hope that I shall find safe refuge in the great Mr. Beck's abode.

Posted by: Oregon Dynamo at September 14, 2011 8:19 PM

Thanks Slash, thanks for not putting any pressure on me to perform.

Posted by: Pookie at September 14, 2011 8:57 PM

I too am a right-wing excentric who has not a home in which to rest, and also hopes beyond hope that I shall find safe refuge in the great Mr. Beck's abode.
Posted by: Oregon Dynamo at September 14, 2011 8:19 PM

I can't stop guffawing.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at September 14, 2011 9:14 PM

If you reside in america, you pay taxes as a former foreign national, I know this. Simon and Elton pay taxes here if they buy a cheeseburger, purchase a home, or earn any kind of income here.

Dustin mentioned in this article about affording to pay for health care. I got sick out of the blue earlier this year. One day my doctor told me I'm anemic, the next I'm in the E.R. not realizing I was on the verge of a heart attack. I take care of myself but my job was slowly killing me. I've been getting up at 3 something in the morning for years. It resulted in me being out of work for over 3 months. I just went back to work a little over a month ago on the night shift. As my luck would have it, my company had been performing a 'clerical error' for over 6 months. Our premiums went up but they weren't taking enough money out of our paychecks for those of us who can afford insurance. We were told by letter at the end of our shifts a day before payday.

Tell me what it feels like to have almost half of your pay taken out of your deposit at once without notice. What a wonderful experience. I've never, ever been screwed with all my clothes on until that moment. I can tell you that you get winded really quick.

I won't even go much further into the emotional distress but I must take my hat off to these important people who strive to do their best to entertain us. They work hard for the money.

Posted by: Candy at September 14, 2011 10:54 PM

Hey Dustin. Decided to return the favor. Laughed my liberal ass off. Screw the right wing nutjobs if they can't take a joke. Just don't tell Ellie I used the word "ass" -- she already knows I'm a liberal.

Posted by: e.e.pop at September 14, 2011 11:15 PM

There's no point in raising taxes if you don't cut spending

Agreed, except for all the extra money you get, there is no point.

Posted by: John G. at September 14, 2011 11:37 PM

that goddamn wall they want to erect to keep the foreigners out.
---
I guess this makes me racist (remind me again, which race are Hispanics?), but I really don't understand why it isn't in any nation's best interests to secure its own borders as best it can.

Posted by: , at September 14, 2011 11:54 PM

Wait, Tyler Perry gets paid?! This will not stand!

Also, you left out baby eating Koch brother shills, rubes & worshipers of Bhapomet. Come on. Get it right.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 14, 2011 11:55 PM

I guess this makes me racist (remind me again, which race are Hispanics?), but I really don't understand why it isn't in any nation's best interests to secure its own borders as best it can.

Do you hear a lot of clamoring to build a wall on the Canadian border?

That's the racism, right there. It's not about protecting the border. It's the hypocritical notion that we use illegal immigrants to subsidize our lifestyle but we should punish the everloving fuck out of them for daring to cross that border to do the jobs we don't want to do.

In my state, we had crops rotting in the field because nobody would pick them after the passage of an anti-illegal immigration bill. Rotting in the field. And that put paid to every Tea Partier's cry that illegal immigrants are taking American jobs from where I stand.

Posted by: Wednesday at September 15, 2011 8:11 AM

A couple of weeks ago Antony Bourdain was a guest on the Bill Maher show and the immigration issue came up. He pointed out that for 20 years he was responsible for all the hiring in his restaurant and not once in those 20 years did an American come in looking for a job in busing tables, washing dishes, or doing anything but chefing and waiting tables.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 15, 2011 10:23 AM

Interesting to see that even normally rational entertainment sites are turning to shilling for the failing elitist, Keynesian, warmongering, interventionist, police-state administration now that so many people are waking up to what a disaster it really is.

I guess those living in the isolated, wealthy cathedral of university life are as equally deluded about real life in the working world.

Posted by: Squirrel at September 15, 2011 10:42 AM

Interesting to see that even normally rational entertainment sites are turning to shilling for the failing elitist, Keynesian, warmongering, interventionist, police-state administration now that so many people are waking up to what a disaster it really is.

I guess those living in the isolated, wealthy cathedral of university life are as equally deluded about real life in the working world as those living in the cocoon of Hollywood.

Posted by: Squirrel at September 15, 2011 10:43 AM

Wednesday and PaddyDog,

For one thing, there aren't millions of Canadians pouring across the border or already here.

For another, you completely ignored my question because you'd rather try to score your points with overheated rhetoric (you, Wednesday; Paddy, not so much):

Why is any nation not entitled to secure its borders in any way it sees fit? Should all nations simply allow anyone in who is able to walk across the line? Is that how it works in the rest of the world? How would that go over in Israel, for example? Then of course you have those nations who secure their borders more to keep people in than out, but that's another story.

Is the passport system racist? Why have that at all? Why have ANY checks on who's in your country? Let's do away with airport security and border patrols, while we're at it. *sarcasm*

Now, you want to talk about immigration reform, make it easier for people who want to come legally to do so? I'm fine with that. It's a pretty arduous and expensive process, as I understand it. It probably should be easier. And even for people who don't want to become citizens, there should probably be an easier way for people who just want to work here, to do all of Anthony Bourdain's grunt work, to do so.

See how "racist" I am? And I keep asking but no one answers: What race are Hispanics, again? Really, I think you mean "bigoted," but if I were a bigot, I'd probably have to move off my block, what with the black family next door and the Afghanis two doors down and the Asians on either end.

I just can't fathom why anyone in 20 fucking 11 thinks we or any nation should just leave the borders wide open, with no checks on who is here and why. I can't take anyone seriously who thinks on such a juvenile utopian level.

Posted by: , at September 15, 2011 10:57 AM

Sorry for the (mostly) double post.

@PaddyDog - I can't help but assume that Bourdain was making shit up. Around here, people scramble for those jobs, disappointed when they're not the one that gets it. And they guys that get the server and chef jobs are the bussers and dishwashers that have been there proving themselves for a few months.

Posted by: Squirrel at September 15, 2011 10:59 AM

(Emphasis added to this ...)

In my state, we had crops rotting in the field because nobody would pick them after the passage of an anti-illegal immigration bill. Rotting in the field. And that put paid to every Tea Partier's cry that illegal immigrants are taking American jobs from where I stand.

Posted by: Wednesday at September 15, 2011 8:11 AM

I think you have your reactionary minorities (of opinion) mixed up.

- "Taking American jobs" is the labor-wing that generally lines up with the Democratic party.

- The "sucking up services" riff is the so-called "establishment" Republican party.

- When the Tea Party folk talk about immigration at all, it's a "rule of law" POV. It takes a while for them to get there from their starting point - free markets, constitutionally limited government & fiscal responsibility.

I refer to what these various folks say for themselves, not what some third party says about them. Oh, you also forgot the kittens. All these people eat kittens. Crunchy, crunchy kittens. Me, too. Love them. Tastes like chicken!

(And I still can't believe that Tyer Perry gets paid.)

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 15, 2011 11:32 AM

Squirrel: I have no idea where "around here" is but in Chicago I can say with certainty that in my time working in bars and restaurants, no Americans ever asked for those jobs either. Once when I was working as a bartender, the manager asked me if I would help out cleaning up in the kitchen during the day. I happily complied and the other bartenders banded against me telling me "he'll think we're as low as Mexicans if you agree to do that shit". So based on personal experience, I tend to believe Bourdain.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 15, 2011 11:32 AM

"Organ grinder! We're taxing your monkey. Monkey! We're taxing your tail."
We're a single income family recovering from our wage earner having major surgery - heart - and months of unemployment. I am already paying the bill collectors who call me via added fees and feel sure I will soon be taxed for each call as well.
Everybody should pay their fair share. End of story. I should and do. So should the wealthy.

Posted by: Agogagogo at September 15, 2011 11:34 AM

Comma:

Securing borders has nothing to do with immigration reform. I'm all for making the ports safe and inspecting containers properly, but building a wall where Mexico starts is just pandering to racist extremists: it makes the US no safer. Passports and visas also have nothing to do with securing borders: no-one from the 9/11 attacks was here illegally.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 15, 2011 11:36 AM

Paddy,

My point was that it's not incompatible, nor does it make one a bigot, to think that immigration laws should be relaxed while at the same time thinking that a sovereign nation is entitled to secure its borders by any means it sees fit.

So, what, you're saying we should still secure the border at crossings (we even do that with Canada, Wednesday) but leave the rest of the line wide open so more Mexicans can die in the desert? Since immigration reform doesn't seem to be happening anytime soon, under Dem or GOP administrations. That's very compassionate.

Posted by: , at September 15, 2011 11:52 AM

@PaddyDog

That doesn't surprise me about Chicago. I've been there a few times (although never for more than a week at a stretch), and it always struck me as one of the most racist places in America.

That's not to say there's no racism here Virginia, but I've never seen the kind of superiority attitudes I encountered all over Chicago, like your example.

The only jobs I see dominated by any race around here are the construction jobs, which do seem to be mostly Hispanic. But that has more to do with Donald Trump subsidiaries / subcontractors that are probably paying below minimum. Plenty of Americans around here that would like those jobs, too.

Posted by: Squirrel at September 15, 2011 11:57 AM

@PaddyDog

That's funny. I did day labor from time to time out in Seattle when I was between gigs and bored. They called me "the white guy", since I was the only ... well, you know.

This is a shame, though: "he'll think we're as low as Mexicans if you agree to do that shit". Who thinks that way?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 15, 2011 12:08 PM

Where's the Pookie rant? C'mon, make with the funny and sarcastic and profane ...

Posted by: Slash at September 15, 2011 12:24 PM

Wait a second ...

So the reason we should leave our Mexican border unsecured by a fence is so Anthony Bourdain and the wealthy agribusinesses can continue to hire scut-work help on the cheap, not that they should have to pay living wages to their employees? (And I trust that if Anthony paid his dishwashers and busboys $50 an hour he'd have no trouble finding help, white Americans or otherwise, but I bet he doesn't.)

I hope you see the irony of that on a thread about how the wealthy should pay more taxes to, in part, support programs for the poor.

If your argument then becomes, well, if they had to pay the help more, then the price of food at the grocery and a meal at Bourdain's restaurants would shoot up, and nobody would be able to afford to eat, least of all the poor.

Then my counter argument becomes, what, higher taxes aren't increased costs to be passed along to the consumer, so that fewer people can afford to eat, least of all the poor?

The liberal idea, apparently, is that Anthony Bourdain should continue to pay help on the cheap but the government should take more of his income to funnel to the poor (minus, of course, a hefty overhead for Congressional salaries, the IRS system etc.). The conservative idea might be that if you cut out the pool of readily available (illegal) help willing to work for Anthony on the cheap, then he might just have to pay a living wage to legal citizens, who, BTW, would then pay more in taxes.

I'm just suggesting we cut out the middle man.

(Yes, I realize not every restaurateur is in Anthony Bourdain's financial stratosphere, and that's fair game for your next counter argument, but since he got trotted out as an example I decided to make one of him.)

Posted by: , at September 15, 2011 12:44 PM

You don't see the hypocrisy inherent in enjoying the benefits of illegal labor but persecuting the actual illegal laborers? If you really want to solve the problem, go after employers who turn a blind eye to illegals, especially if they can pay them under the table. Not the poor saps who risk life and limb to come take shitty jobs that are still better than what they can find at home.

I don't give really care if you have TWO black friends. That argument is specious and you know it.

"Controlling the border" is a code phrase, that's all, for keeping out illegal aliens. If it truly, honestly meant keeping our borders safe from those who would do us harm, I don't actually have a problem with it. But it doesn't.

Posted by: Wednesday at September 15, 2011 12:58 PM

All of a sudden whitey is worried about taxes and the goddamn boarder. You sons of bitches Republicans, when there’s a conservative in the white house you fuckers don’t give one fucking bit about taxes or the fucking boarder. But the minute a Dem gets into office all of sudden you maggots discover morals. Only on talk radio will you hear trailer trash talking about their taxes being raised, you stupid fuckers, if it weren’t for the government you’d be living on the fucking streets begging me to clean my windshield. And you fucking progressives, yeah you, are you not tired of stabbing Obama in the back. This guy is trying to drag your ass over the finish line but you bitch and moan about him not doing it fast enough. Fuck you progressives, fuck you lefties, fuck you Michael Moore, fuck you Bill Maher, fuck you huffington post, fuck you fire dog lake, fuck you daily kos, fuck you Rachel Maddow, fuck you Keith Olbermann, fuck you Ed Shultz. Fuck you democrats that didn’t vote in the 2010 midterms because you called yourself trying to teach Obama a lesson. Ask those fuckers in Madison Wisconsin how did that shit work out for them. I can’t wait until Obama leaves office you fucking shit for brains democrats are going to be up shit creek, these Republicans are going to turn American into Mad Max beyond Thunder dome.


P.S. Star Wars is coming out tomorrow on blu-ray and I hope Lucas finger fucks everyone. I hope he treats Star Wars like a filthy whore, I hope he’s taking the gobs of money he’s going to get from the Star Wars nation and wipes his ass with it. I hope he’s running around sky walker ranch naked and telling all of his employees to kneel before Zod.

Posted by: Pookie at September 15, 2011 2:35 PM

See kids this is why your mom told you not to talk about politics or religion when company comes over because people you thought were normal turn into whackjobs when you start talking about politics or religion.

Posted by: LOGAN at September 15, 2011 3:47 PM

Bravo, Pookie...

Yeah, most Democratic voters are goddam idiots. They vote once every 4 years, if that, and then act like they're "making a difference."

The assholes on the other side don't vote every 4 years in just the presidential elections. They vote every goddam year, multiple times, in every pissant election they can. They know that shit starts at the local level. Which makes them smarter than most Democrats. And that is fucking pathetic, when you're dumber than Republican voters.

Democrats are some of the politically laziest motherfuckers in America, so they deserve to lose. Whatever else you say about the Republicans, you can't say they don't work hard at being such colossal assholes.

Posted by: Slash at September 15, 2011 4:14 PM

Pookie, Thunderdome is one word. And I can't fucking wait.

Posted by: Greedy at September 15, 2011 5:17 PM

Thanks, Dustin. I thought it was funny and didn't take it seriously.

Posted by: Chiggy at September 15, 2011 5:17 PM

Slash, you can not deny that democrats shoot themselves in the foot. President Obama has delivered things that democratic presidents have tried to deliver for decades. And yet we get progressives bitching and moaning that it took him too long. The democratic party seem to not have his back all the time. Clinton got his dick sucked in the oval office and the democratic party never wavered in its support of Clinton. A week from now gays will be able to serve openly in the military for the first time in history all because of President Obama. Ask people with preexisting medical conditions how they feel about finally being able to get medical insurance without having to worry about being dropped by their insurer. I can go on and on, but why even bother. Whatever, good luck.

Posted by: Pookie at September 15, 2011 5:36 PM

Unfortunately Greedy you're going to be the guy that gets his fingers chopped off trying to catch a fucking boomerang. Thereby making the coming apocalypse a shitty experience for you.

Posted by: Pookie at September 15, 2011 5:53 PM

Nice racist little rant on the Tea Parties and thus exposing your own bigotry.


What a jackass.....

Posted by: Joe at September 15, 2011 6:04 PM

Seriously, Dustin Rowles , what a fcking moron you are.

The Tea Parties are NOT racist or homophobic. That is just left wing jackassery at it's finest. This post truly makes you look like a complete and total idiot.

And any Jew who doesn't vote Republican in the next election is a moron, too seeing as Obama is the most anti-Semitic president we've ever had and hates Israel.

Posted by: Joe at September 15, 2011 6:08 PM

oooh nice one Joe i do care about isreal.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at September 15, 2011 7:02 PM

Just to show you the hypocrisy of the tea-baggers, those fuckers whine about spending money on foreign aid but yet they will shit bricks at the thought of Israel not receiving financial aid from America. And before one of you shit-baggers accuse me of being an anti-Semite, I’m not, I’m anti-hypocrisy.

Posted by: Pookie at September 15, 2011 7:18 PM

Yes, Pookie, of course I agree. The Democratic party have become masters at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

And I'm tired of the bitching about Obama. People act like he's Gandalf and can make things happen with a wave of his magic wand. He got handed a shitpile by Bush Inc. and was expected to turn it around on a fucking dime.

Now people expect him to create jobs for them. Sure, he's probably got 14 million great paying, awesome jobs stored up his ass for just such an occasion. And the Congress full of people who hate him and will cheerfully fuck the rest of us just to deny him any success at all won't be any problem. One big happy family in D.C. It's no wonder our country is such a clusterfuck.

Posted by: Slash at September 15, 2011 8:13 PM

"Sure, he's probably got 14 million great paying, awesome jobs stored up his ass for just such an occasion."

Posted by: Slash at September 15, 2011 8:13 PM


Slash, with your permission of course, may I use that line from now until the day I shake this mortal coil and converse with the gods?

Posted by: Pookie at September 15, 2011 8:54 PM

Slash, the worst thing is that not only the "common people" expect it from him, but also the media. You know, the people who should fucking tell their consumers that politicians cannot create jobs. They only can try to jumpstart job creation by 'setting the stage', so to speak.

Posted by: FabMax at September 15, 2011 9:00 PM

Posted by: Pookie at September 15, 2011 2:35 PM
---
That. Was. Epic.

I bow to the master.

Posted by: , at September 16, 2011 1:47 AM

@","

There is indeed a non-racist and legitimate debate to be had about illegal immigration.

It's just that the anti-illegal crowd tends to be represented by the likes of Michele Bachmann, who recently stated that immigration policies were ruined during the 1960s.

What happened to immigration policies in the 1960s? Oh yeah, strict quotas were lifted from non-white countries.

So you have to understand the instinctive distrust that non-racists have towards the anti-illegal crowd whenever the illegal immigration debate comes up.

Posted by: Chris JL at September 19, 2011 6:40 AM

Well, I like Spielberg and DiCaprio. But yeah, the rest can go fuck themselves.

Posted by: Robin at September 21, 2011 12:54 AM