web
counter
 

The 10 Most Expensive Romantic Comedies Ever Made

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (17)



mrbig.jpg

The romantic comedy is not dead. The romantic comedy, like second and third tier comic-book movies (Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, Kick-ass, Hellboy) simply have box-office ceilings. The horror movie industry understands this better than anyone: You don’t see a lot of expensively made horror flicks (the biggest budgeted horror movie I can recall off the top of my head was The Grudge at about $50 million, though most average around $20 million), and yet horror movies are almost always profitable.

Since 1978, the average gross for a romantic comedy released wide is $44 million. That means $30 - $40 million should be the most a studio should risk on this universe, and yet studios time and again overreach by overpaying top-shelf talent for what is essentially a niche audience — a large niche, perhaps, but there’s a ceiling. Nobody understands this better than the folks behind He’s Just Not That Into You and Valentine’s Day, two movies with modest $50 million budgets, a huge number of A and B-list stars, and a profit about double what the budget is, before DVD sales.

The lesson here, and one that How Do You Know paid dearly to learn, is that, in order for most romantic comedies to succeed, you have to scale back the costs and go in with modest expectations, because even if you do manage to be one of the most successful romantic comedies, the margins are slim when your budget is $80 million.

It’s not always the case, of course. But the risk/reward suggests that studios should keep making romantic comedies, they should just err on the conservative side. You don’t pay Reese Witherspoon $15 million when you can get Katherine Heigl for $5 million, and loathe as I am to admit it, Heigl’s terrible romantic comedies are always profitable (except The Killers, the $75 million movie that only made $43 million, but it’s not categorized as a rom-com; it’s action-comedy, a genre with a much higher ceiling).

Here are the 10 most expensive romantic comedies ever made, and their domestic grosses.


1. How Do You Know: Estimated $19 million gross (Budget: $120 million)

2. Sex and the City 2: $95 million gross (Budget: $100 million)

3. Fun with Dick and Jane $110 million gross (Budget: $100 million)

4. Bewitched: $63 million gross (Budget: $85 million)

5. It’s Complicated: $112 million (Budget: $85 million)

6. The Holiday: $63 million (Budget: $85 million)

7. Something’s Gotta Give: $124 million gross (Budget: $80 million)

8. 50 First Dates: $120 million gross (Budget: $75 million)

9. What Women Want: $182 million (Budget: $70 million)

10. Hitch: $179 million (Budget: $70 million)










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The 15 Worst Movie Posters of 2010 | Yogi Bear Review | Anna Faris, You've Done It Again









Comments

Having seen 6 of these (sometimes what my mom and grandma are both willing to sit through on the rainy day of vacation is very limited), I find myself wondering:

What was most of that money in those budgets for? Was craft services dusting everything with edible gold flakes?

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at December 20, 2010 2:36 PM

I wouldn't consider any of those good movies. The only decent thing up there is It's Complicated. In fact, the only great rom-com I've seen in years is (500) Days of Summer. Best romantic comedy since Annie Hall, in my opinion.

Posted by: Vick at December 20, 2010 2:40 PM

When did Fun With Dick and Jane become a rom-com?

Posted by: Rest In Peace at December 20, 2010 2:48 PM

Is it bad that I don't think I have even heard of "How Do You Know?" With a budget that big, there had to be advertising somewhere.

Posted by: Jennifer at December 20, 2010 3:03 PM

I was thinking exactly the same thing, Rest in Peace.

Posted by: Sara Tonin at December 20, 2010 3:31 PM

allow me to summarize the plot of every rom-com in this Haiku (my first so be gentle with me)

He/she likes me
He/she likes me not
He/she likes me

Posted by: John W at December 20, 2010 4:21 PM

I liked Hitch. Yeah, I said it.

And my God, Bewitched was TERRIBLE.

Posted by: TWoP_Fan at December 20, 2010 5:10 PM

The great thing about HOW DO YOU KNOW flopping is that we don't have to see Reese Witherspoon again. Until she is fighting Jennifer Aniston for a sitcom role in about 6 months.

Posted by: Sean at December 20, 2010 6:35 PM

Can we combine some of these to make really really incredibly expensive movies? They might even be better than the originals...

Sex on the 50 First Dates: Something's Gotta Give (probably my vagina)
Hitch Bewitched! (I'll se anything that rhymes)
It's 2 Complicated (the dramatization of WhenParentsText)
How Do You Know What Women Want? Fun With Dick (the movie with all the answers!)

Posted by: esme at December 20, 2010 6:49 PM

I liked Hitch too. It's also the only movie on this list that I've seen.

Posted by: dsbs at December 20, 2010 7:09 PM

Lest you say to yourself, well at least some of these went into the black, films have to make about 2x to 3x of their budget to earn back production and post production costs...and don't forget some of the box office does go to the movie theatres that to show them. "Hitch" is the only one that had numbers that qualified as profit on the low end.

It scares me when I understand the financial end better than the suits. But I wasn't in the meetings when Reese batted her baby blues and stated her salary needs.

Posted by: SittingPat at December 20, 2010 7:13 PM

Oh, and, esme? I'd buy your pitch.

Posted by: SittingPat at December 20, 2010 7:14 PM

The haiku is missing a syllable in the middle sentence (assuming you are counting "slash" as a syllable).

Replace "likes" with "liketh" and it works ...

Posted by: jollies at December 20, 2010 7:18 PM

What is it with Nancy Meyers & her exorbitant budgets? She's got four of her babies up there in the top 10.

Is it just because she exclusively traffics in rom-coms (some amusing and some decidedly NOT) and has had relative success with them or does she just have massively incriminating photos of all of the top movie execs?

And, as I said, a few of the Meyers films are fun, light fluff but I've seen all four of the ones on the list and I have to mimic several other observations: WHERE IN THE SWEET BABY FUCK ARE ALL THOSE DOLLARS GOING? The mind reels...

Posted by: Vonnegut Slut at December 20, 2010 9:59 PM

@SittingPat . . . many of these movies are in the black because of DVD sales and some of them made a couple of bucks overseas. "How Do You Know" will NOT make a profit in any way shape or form because it's total crap but some of the others have/will. And the 2x-3x budget formula is not set in stone.

The only movies on that list that I've seen are "It's Complicated" and "Somethings Gotta Give." I thought "Complicated" was kind of funny but not really enough so it mattered and the ending was dumb. "Something" was hilarious and very sweet with the olds falling in love.

Posted by: mslewis at December 20, 2010 10:37 PM

I can't believe I've seen 7 of these, but the most recent ones. And will probably see the rest on a cold night snuggled in front of the TV. What is wrong with me? I need to get a life.

Posted by: Kateshi Rinkichiku at December 21, 2010 8:11 AM

The great thing about HOW DO YOU KNOW flopping is that we don't have to see Reese Witherspoon again. Until she is fighting Jennifer Aniston for a sitcom role in about 6 months.

Posted by: Sean at December 20, 2010 6:35 PM

Wasn't Reese Jennifer's little sister on Friends? Oh the irony.

Posted by: ed newman at December 22, 2010 11:43 AM