web
counter
 

Ten Movies That Achieved Significant Backlash Before They Were Even Released

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (40)



junobacklash.jpg

It started on the Internet with Snakes on a Plane, a movie largely fueled by Internet hype and a catchphrase that never went away. I still regard SoaP as a movie that lived up to the hype, something that many can’t agree or disagree with, however, because that very marketing hype scared a lot of people away. Studios probably should’ve learned something from that experience: You can use the Internet to effectively saturate exposure, but too much, and you risk alienating the very people you are targeting.

It’s common sense, but there have also been studies support that common sense: The Journal of Consumer Research determined that ” too much hype can be detrimental.” And it’s not just about creating unrealistic expectations that a film can’t possibly live up to; it’s also about having those expectations crammed so hard down your throat that you will yourself not to like a movie out of spite. It’s not necessarily even the movie’s fault; Snakes on a Plane peaked about two weeks too early. If it had been released before the fatigue had set in, maybe there would’ve been a different box-office outcome.

It’s not always even the fault of marketing, either. If you go on a long road trip and listen to the same radio station for six consecutive hours, by the end of that road trip, there will likely be one or two radio jingles so lodged into your brain that you’ll refuse to buy a product based on principle. But most people don’t listen to one radio station for six consecutive hours. Nowadays, with DVRs, Netflix, ITunes, and streaming content online, a lot of people don’t even see television commercials much anymore. Marketing people saturate those airwaves in the hopes of reaching you once or twice; the people who get hit 50 or 60 times are outliers.

But if you’re reading this, chances are, you spend a lot of time on the Internet, and you may even read one or two other movie blogs. If that’s the case, there’s probably a lot of movies you’re completely sick of by the time they are released. We are part of the problem, of course. Every time we chase down a rumor, every time we report a bit of casting news, and every time we show you a trailer, you get closer to your own saturation point. We are trying to correct that to some degree by not focusing as much on trade minutia, by dumping a lot of it in a single trade post (Trade News that Will Razz Your Berries), and by not presenting every single goddamn trailer that comes out. We try to stick to a three-trailer max (teaser, theatrical, theatrical #2), and not bombard you with the special trailers, the TV Spots, and even the new Interactive trailers. We steered clear largely of the Inception marketing hype before that movie was released, in part because we knew that no one was reading it anyway because nobody wanted to be exposed to the hype. Indeed, as someone who reads a ton of movie sites, I generally stop reporting on something once I’ve grown sick of it, and that usually happens about three or four weeks before it’s released. For instance, have you seen any Scott Pilgrim coverage here over the last month? I was somewhat heartened to hear that many people had not even heard of The Other Guys before our review was released. I learned my lesson last year with (500) Days of Summer by managing to create a small backlash among our readers before it was even released.

The larger point is: Marketing hype, especially on the Internet, can often kill a movie, either by creating unrealistic expectations or by creating an oversaturation backlash. I knew, for instance, when I assigned Steven the review for Avatar that he was in a no-win situation: Too many people had made up their minds about the movie already, and whether he loved it or hated it, he’d either be accused of giving into the hype or unfairly rebelling against it (for the record, Steven’s probably one of the least susceptible to hype movie writers on the Internet). Either way, he’d get shredded, and the comments in that review suggested as much.

Dan’s got Scott Pilgrim, the latest entry into the marketing oversaturation backlash, and I suspect he’ll face a similar problem unless we’ve done our job better ahead of the film, which is to say: Make people aware of it, but not entirely kill the buzz. We haven’t covered it since June 17th and have only devoted five posts to it in the last year (though, the site is covered in Pilgrim ads) and track 65 Google results, compared to, say, the industry leader, Slashfilm, where there are 1,210 Google results or the fanboy site Ain’t It Cool where there are 3,780 results (undoubtedly, many of those mentions came in comments sections in unrelated or only tangentially related post, but still … it’s getting a fuckload of exposure). If you follow Twitter (where the movie has been a trending topic for awhile), or if you read five or six movie blogs, you’ve probably already developed a strong opinion of the Scott Pilgrim before you’ve even seen it. And in some instances, the more the cool kids prattle on about it, the less you want to be one of the cool kids, so you hate it already. It’s human nature (Down with the Cool Kids!). I understand the desire to champion a movie, but maybe the best way to do that is to gently nudge someone into a theater instead of shoving them in against their will.

But remember this: By Tuesday, it’ll probably all go away, and hopefully, by Wednesday, all you’ll be left with are the true impressions you had of the movie. That is, if the hype hasn’t scared you away from seeing it in the first place.

It’s not a new problem, of course. It’s happened many times over the last several years. And as marketing over-saturation backlash (MOB) goes, these are the ten worst offenders on the Internet. In some cases, the films lived up to expectations; in some cases, they didn’t. In other cases (Grindhouse, Watchmen, Kick-Ass, Snakes on a Plane), the hype prevented a lot of people from even seeing them at all (I’m excluding Inception because I honestly believe that most people who wanted to see it completely avoided the coverage). It’s funny, too, how the overpowering pre-release hype on Juno now feels relatively quaint.

10. Juno

9. Paranormal Activity

8. Kick Ass

7. Iron Man 2

6. Grindhouse

5. Avatar

4. Scott Pilgrim

3. Snakes on a Plane

2. Watchmen

1. Cloverfield









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



A Shameless but Earnest Call for Votes | News About South by Southwest 2011 | The Rundown Review | Maximum Ridiculosity









Comments

10. Juno - Still haven't seen it. But I didn't avoid it because of hype. I just never got around to seeing it.

9. Paranormal Activity - Wasn't interested, period. No hype exposure because I avoided it.

8. Kick Ass - Was mildly interested. Excess coverage here got boring. Friend said it was a disappointment. Haven't seen it.

7. Iron Man 2 - Didn't make time to see it. Partially disappointed in myself as a result.

6. Grindhouse - Netflix streamed it. First part was dull. Second part was fun. Wasn't over exposed to it at all.

5. Avatar - Not really overexposed. Saw it on a lark when a friend bought the tix. Thought it was bloated, horribly derivative and predictable. Never need to see it again.

4. Scott Pilgrim - I feel over exposed despite efforts to reduce cable television intake of late, there are THAT many commercials running on the channels I watch. Friend says it's good, though, so I want to see it.

3. Snakes on a Plane - Only seen it on commercial TV. I love "I'm sick and tired of these monkey fighting snakes on this Monday through Friday plane!" It is to snakes what Deep Blue Sea is to makos - just dumb fun.

2. Watchmen - WAY over exposed. Anyone who goes to Comic Con would have felt that way after hearing that Crapping Frumpkins song over and over and over and over and over and over and over again on the Con floor in 2008. Bought it on iTunes, it has its moments, but repeat viewings leave me less impressed each time.

1. Cloverfield - Way overexposed. Interesting concept, overall, loved the ending, but wish I had just waited to see it at home.

Posted by: lubeg at August 11, 2010 2:03 PM

I think you guys have done an excellent job on Scott Pilgrim, so much so that I stopped going to some other sites as frequently because I was getting sick of their coverage (not coverage of the movie itself, per se). I've read the books, I've seen the trailers, and I'm going to see the movie this weekend. This is thanks, in large part, because Pajiba has been an oasis where I've gotten respite and re-energized. So, much obliged, kiddos. Keep up the good work!

Also, the only movie I haven't seen in this list (not counting Pilgrim, obviously) is Paranormal Activity. I can say, though, that SoaP's oversaturation kept me out of the theater. All the others, however, I went to see on opening weekend or within two weeks of release. Outside of Avatar, the coverage for me was just right. Then again, I'm not one of the cool kids.

Posted by: RobP at August 11, 2010 2:06 PM

Human Centipede: most hyped movie in the history of Pajiba?

(And no one saw it. Mission accomplished! -- DR

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 11, 2010 2:08 PM

I don't need hype or backlash to avoid Scott Pilgrim. I won't see that movie for two reasons 1) Micheal Cera and 2) the line "Well, I'm bi-furious." Really? "Bi-furious"? It took three assholes, a 14-year-old Thai hooker and a mountain of cocaine to come up with "Well, I'm bi-furious"? The world deserves to die by fire.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at August 11, 2010 2:11 PM

Word Tracer, WORD.

Posted by: Scully at August 11, 2010 2:12 PM

Out of those 10 the only two that really bugged me were Kick Ass and Scott Pilgrim. The internet killed Kick-Ass for me. They wouldn't shut the hell up about it. And then it was released and it was WORSE because it was so damn polarizing and everyone had to have a say. And now I have zero desire to watch it because I was so sick of it by the time it was available to me. Same with Scott Pilgrim. The trailers make it look interesting, but if the internet doesn't shut the fuck up about it (and how good or bad it might be, or about how quirky or silly or how Michael Cera-ish it might be) I'm going to lose any interest I might have had for it.

Therefore I say to those geeks: shut the fuck up. We get that you're excited for a geeky movie, but the more you push something in our faces the less likely we are to want to see it. You're never going to convince anyone by shouting in their faces.

Posted by: figgy at August 11, 2010 2:18 PM

Lord, Snakes on a Plane on opening night was just a fucking blast. Fresh from an extended happy hour, the theater was packed with people just ready to have a good time. I've seen it 2-3 times since then and it's still a damn fun B movie.

If I want to see a movie I avoid the coverage. I'll watch the trailer but that is it. I really don't get sucked into hype that much and don't like to pre-judge. I didn't see Iron Man 2 because everyone I know that saw it said to wait and I wasn't that fired up anyway. Scott Pilgrim looks interesting, but it also looks annoying to watch in a theater. I'll wait until it comes home.

Grindhouse was extremely disappointing. The experience of watching it in the theater was kind of fun, but I wish the movies had been better.

Cloverfield was a lot of fun in a theater. I know everyone seemed happy with it at our opening night showing.

The rest I waited until they came home. Since I paused Watchmen about 5 times during the course of that 3 hour movie that was probably a wise move.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 11, 2010 2:25 PM

9 1/2 Weeks
Passion of the Christ
World Trade Center

Posted by: richmac at August 11, 2010 2:26 PM

Dude, this is not how you write a list. This is an article about backlash and why backlash exists with ten movies at the end. The list should tell us why these movies got a backlash. Why did they become too hype up? Did they lead to false assumptions etc?

Posted by: lol at August 11, 2010 2:34 PM

Human Centipede: most hyped movie in the history of Pajiba?

While I will concede that this was primarily my fault, I don't think it counts because

a) it was less hyping and more warning/fearfulness (although that can be seen as synonymous in some respects)

and

b) I did it sheerly out of malice in an effort to punish you all.

Posted by: TK at August 11, 2010 2:36 PM

I saw every single one of these movies the day they came out (except Scott Pilgrim, which I already have plans to see Friday). How disappointingly mainstream of me. However, in my defense, I only really liked two of them, or two and a half if you count Planet Terror by itself.

Posted by: vic9 at August 11, 2010 2:39 PM

Yeah, TK, but you were the only one who actually saw it. Who's punishing whom, hmmm?

*runs*

Posted by: figgy at August 11, 2010 2:55 PM

I'm surprised that movies like Last Temptation of Christ, 9 1/2 Weeks, The Crying Game or Dogma didn't make the list. Yes, they're all pre-Internet (except for Dogma) but their "controversial" nature meant they were often lashed against before they were seen.

As for the list:
10. Juno -- never saw it. Just never interested.

9. Paranormal Activity -- saw it. Liked it but didn't love it. With movies like this, you really need to see them with an audience that wants to like it.

8. Kick Ass -- same thing as PA. Liked it, didn't love it.

7. Iron Man 2 -- enjoyed it, will be buying the DVD. Don't get the hate.

6. Grindhouse -- enjoyed it too. I understand why many didn't. This is a movie geeks' movie made by 2 movie geeks.

5. Avatar -- saw it, appreciated it. Never got the backlash or the devotion it engendered.

4. Scott Pilgrim -- not really interested, but I'll likely see it mid-week just because Ed Wright has done no wrong. Still, it feels too cute and full of itself.

3. Snakes on a Plane -- saw it. Seeing it drunk helps.

2. Watchmen -- loved it. Ironically the backlash came from the most devoted fans who hated the changes and could never accept what Snyder did.

1. Cloverfield -- a case of the marketing being better than the movie.

Posted by: Fredo at August 11, 2010 2:58 PM

My policy is that if it looks awesome, I'll see it (Kick-Ass, Scott Pilgrim), and if it doesn't (Snakes on a Plane, Paranormal Activity), I won't. And that's pretty much worked.

Posted by: futuredirect at August 11, 2010 3:04 PM

When considering the hype of a movie, you have to try to understand what the FUCK their respective studios and marketing departments want to convey to YOU. Also, both mainstream and underground films are wielded as weapons by TK and his internet brethren with ulterior motives. When possible, it is up to YOU to weed out the good intentions from the bad. Otherwise, you'll end up MISERABLE in the theater, wondering if you're being controlled by some giant COCKSTAIN of a movie reviewer.

Posted by: Kballs at August 11, 2010 3:05 PM

You people understand that if you see a link to said "over exposed" movie - you don't have to click the fucking link, right? I troll multiple movie sites, read stuff I care about, look at a few pictures for things (i.e. Tron Legacy), but if there's a new trailer that leaked online? My eyes don't see it. Even if it's linked on every movie site. The only way it's witnessed by these eyes are if it's placed on the trailer reel.

Now, I don't watch cable television. Episodes are streamed via Netflix or other means for shows. That could be the difference but "over exposure on the internet"? What-the-fuck-ever.

Posted by: Zerath at August 11, 2010 3:18 PM

I knew before I opened this that Scott Pilgrim would be mentioned, which I guess means it is indeed over-hyped already. But I think it looks cute. Then again I have never joined the backlash against George Michael (for some reason can't come up with his actual name at the mo').

Posted by: pickled tink at August 11, 2010 3:27 PM

Dude, Gigli didn't even place?! This list is now invalid

Posted by: dirkdikulous at August 11, 2010 3:27 PM

Tracer... you took the words outta my mouth!

Posted by: SaucyWench at August 11, 2010 3:30 PM

Its like Fredo read my mind except I watched Juno and thought it was pretty cool and I never got around to watching Snakes on a Plane.

Posted by: Glyn at August 11, 2010 3:31 PM

I’m excluding Inception because I honestly believe that most people who wanted to see it completely avoided the coverage

True enough for me, at least. I haven't seen it yet but fully intend to, and I have only the vaguest notion of what it's about. And I'm quite happy with that state of affairs.

Posted by: Todd at August 11, 2010 3:36 PM

i've tired on "inception" overexposition but happilly it's a good movie

i saw all movies named but only because i'm crazy on movies

Posted by: caro at August 11, 2010 3:41 PM

caro,

Your tenuous understanding of capitalization, sentence construction, and large words made me smile. Thank you.

Posted by: Kballs at August 11, 2010 3:49 PM

Human Centipede

Posted by: J9 at August 11, 2010 3:54 PM

MUHAHAHAHA!

Posted by: TK at August 11, 2010 3:57 PM

Man, I'm totally glad you ragged on douchebags who won't give a movie a chance because it was overhyped. I hate people like that. The pretentious-type who will tell you that Jim Jarmusch's latest piece of shit was great and that Pixar is overrated. Fuck those wool-hat-in-the-summer-wearing tools.

I'll take someone who is actually earnestly excited for a movie/tv show/what have you - regardless of the hype surrounding it - over a cynical waste of space who writes contrarian opinions on their Facebook wall anyday.

Seriously, if that's the way you think -- go fuck yourself.

*axe to grind apparently*

Posted by: Ed at August 11, 2010 3:58 PM

I passionately avoid reviews/coverage for movies I really care about seeing. If not just for the hijinks that ensue (e.g. Twilight) I use reviews to screen movies that look like they could go either way. I learned to do that after Juno. I hated that movie before I saw it and still do. So good on ya for the new initiative!

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at August 11, 2010 4:04 PM

'Blair Witch Project'

Posted by: oskar at August 11, 2010 4:10 PM

But at least three of those films are arguably pretty darn horrible by filmmaking standards. The hype on those was started by people who hadn't even seen the films and predicted their greatness. Or, in the case of Paranormal Activity, started by people who probably never saw a good haunted house film in their lives and were shocked by things like a moving chandelier or a banging door. Watch The Haunting of Hill House and get back to me, PA hype-makers.

Then you have good films like Juno that were so hailed as the second coming, people were looking for reasons to hate them.

Posted by: Robert at August 11, 2010 4:17 PM

I'm surprised that no one has mentioned Hounddog. It was reviled and condemned by the religious right far before release. There could be a whole subtext of movies that the "Christian" right in this country have made controversial and would like to have banned prior to their release. Not that they had seen them or would even bother to actually know anything about them...but Lord A Mighty they do love to create a backlash!

Posted by: Old guy at August 11, 2010 4:17 PM

I don't think I'm spending enough time online for this to be an issue for me.

I'm with futuredirect; if a movie looks cool I'm going to watch it.

Posted by: superasente at August 11, 2010 4:41 PM

Last Temptation on Christ. I remember being heckled as I left the theatre after the film. On opening day.

*tear runs down cheek*

Still, it was a good flick. And Defoe as Christ. You cannot beat that!

Posted by: bonbiz at August 11, 2010 4:44 PM

Last Temptation OF Christ.

Now you know why I am going to hell. My fat little fingers get into all sorts of wrong business.

Posted by: bonbiz at August 11, 2010 4:45 PM

Its like Fredo read my mind except I watched Juno and thought it was pretty cool and I never got around to watching Snakes on a Plane.

Glyn, what can I say besides....

"MINDTAKER OOOHH! WEEE! OOOOOOHHH!"

/Harvey Birdman: Attorney at Law

Posted by: Fredo at August 11, 2010 4:47 PM

All I can say about the detrimental effect of Marketing (which conveniently, is also the 983rd sign of the Apocalypse) can be summed up in one horrific made up word:

"Mangasm"

Posted by: Juice in LA at August 11, 2010 5:43 PM

Ed - Please have my man babies. There's a guy like that at work. Anything released in America he hates. If it's a tv show it *has* to be on HBO otherwise it's shit, he doesn't even have to watch it to know.

*grumbles*

Posted by: Zerath at August 11, 2010 7:53 PM

@caro: ignore what kballs wrote; he seems to be a purist when it comes to the mechanics of language; the 17th century grammarians would have openly welcomed him into their ranks.

as for this article, i think lol has a point about it being a list and further explanation about the movies on the list would have been good

i've seen half of these films but haven't really been influenced too much by hype (i think). i move around a lot and have been living overseas in some remote places without movie theaters so it helps to temper the hype; i've got pajiba and ebert that i consult but not slavishly and that has worked out well so far.

thx! (poor kballs; this last bit probably drives him crazy)

Posted by: splinter at August 11, 2010 8:31 PM

have you ever heard about it !!this may be a fashion one !! I have joined a group -_____ SugarMomMaMatch.c o m-______ which is a group for younger man and older woman !! I have make many friends here!! I also find my love here!! he is 7 years younger than me ! he is charming and handsome!!

Posted by: chloe at August 11, 2010 8:59 PM

Casino Royale anyone?

Posted by: mcmilld1 at August 11, 2010 9:25 PM

Inception got tons of buzz before it came out, didn't it? That said I still haven't seen it and have managed to avoid reviews. I still really don't get what it's about, and that's the way I likes it going in.

Posted by: stryker1121 at August 11, 2010 10:16 PM