web
counter
 

People We Wish Weren't Scientologists Because We Really Like Them (So Why Would They Do Such A Thing?)

By Joanna Robinson | Posted Under Seriously Random Lists | Comments (129)



jason-lee-header-590x300.jpeg

I know by now that most of you have read (or at least read a summary of) Lawrence Wright’s astonishing “New Yorker” article on Scientology. In it he and writer/director-of-dubious-talent Paul Haggis unveil the troubling and criminal aspects of the church and its more powerful members. When I read the article, my feelings of ambivalence towards Scientology evaporated. Those involved were not only cuckoo birds of the highest magnitude, but (at least at the very top) completely nefarious individuals. Now, the folks on this list may only be guilty of willful ignorance about the Scientology and its practices or serious gullibility when it comes to the stranger tenets of the church, but their association taints my good opinion of them nonetheless. That is to say, I don’t think these folks are monsters, some of them, in fact, were born into the church and I understand, from the “New Yorker” article that it is a very isolating faith and notoriously hard to shake without irrevocably cutting ties with your family and loved ones. Nevertheless, they and their body of work is now tainted for me. Joey Potter, I sort of feebly miss you, but these people? My heart breaks.

BECK HANSON
POP CULTURAL COLLATERAL DAMAGE: Enjoyment of the phrase “beefcake pantyhose” oh, and all the music from Scott Pilgrim vs. The World. Awww, tr*ck, tr*ck, tr*ck.

beck22-499x493.jpeg

JASON DOHRING
POP CULTURAL COLLATERAL DAMAGE: Seasons One and Two of “Veronica Mars.” I can blame the distaste I have for Season Three on neither Dohring, Hubbard nor Xenu.

j5.jpeg

ELISABETH MOSS
POP CULTURAL COLLATERAL DAMAGE: “Mad Men,” some seasons of “West Wing.” Like, all of them except Season Three.

large_moss.jpeg

JASON LEE
POP CULTURAL COLLATERAL DAMAGE: The Early Good Stuff That Kevin Smith Made Before He Lost Perspective and, oh yeah, my favorite Cameron Crowe film. No, not Vanilla Sky, smart *ss. That’s right, Almost Famous. Oh, Feeeever Daaaaawg.

jason-lee-kevin-smith.jpeg

NEIL GAIMAN
POP CULTURAL COLLATERAL DAMAGE: OH JUST MY FAVORITE BOOK OF ALL TIME, “GOOD OMENS.” Also, all his other stuff. But, “Good Omens?” That burns deep.

Neil-Gaiman_l.jpeg

Joanna Robinson will someday, Xenu willing, be a famous player in Hollywood and will, on that day, use all her influence to make a movie of “Good Omens.” Maybe even a miniseries. Dreamcasting it is her favorite diversion. If he’s old enough at that point, Caspar Salmon will play Crowley.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto by Michael Pollan | A BETTER LIFE Trailer: Chris Weitz Looks to Atone for TWILIGHT: NEW MOON, GOLDEN COMPASS, Return to ABOUT A BOY Warmth









Comments

Oh god, I have this list too. My beloved Jason Lee, it breaks my heart everytime I remember that.

Posted by: daria at February 25, 2011 10:03 AM

Danny Masterson. Really, what would Hyde think?

Posted by: jan at February 25, 2011 10:07 AM

Hasn't this list been done before a million times on a million different websites?

Posted by: maka at February 25, 2011 10:10 AM

Gaiman was born into Scientology and has described himself on more than one occasion as being "lapsed." So take that as you will.

Posted by: mightygodking at February 25, 2011 10:11 AM

Meh, none of them are remotely relevant.

/There, I said it.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 25, 2011 10:14 AM

I think there's a huge difference between being raised a Scientologist and choosing Scientology. I had NO IDEA about Elisabeth Moss, though. Crazy!

Posted by: samantha t at February 25, 2011 10:17 AM

Seeing how Caspar has first dibs on Crowley, may I be considered for Aziraphale instead?

"Here are three things people always assume upon meeting Aziraphale: 1) that he is English, 2) that he is very intelligent, and 3) that he is gayer than a tree full of monkeys high on nitrous oxide."

I can definitely pull that off.

Though you know that if this film is successful it means more money for Xenu...

Posted by: Simon at February 25, 2011 10:17 AM

Juliette Lewis. Yeah, yeah, I know, bug nuts crazy but it's a crazy I can't stop watching because that freak flag is like the size of a car dealership flag, you know, one of those huge ones on the highway? And I love her for that.

And Travolta because of the black hat, tight jeans, and two-steppin' in Urban Cowboy. Woooofff. (And he seems like a nice guy, and I feel sorry about Jett.)

Didn't I read here, maybe in a comment somewhere that Gaiman has renounced the faith, or at least backed away from the crazy?

Side note about Gaiman: I am one degree of separation from him. I have twice cooked dinner for Amanda Palmer and therefore am obviously besties with her and will be invited to their hairy wedding.

Posted by: Shonda at February 25, 2011 10:18 AM

Shonda, hate to bust your bubble, but Gaiman and Palmer got married already. They both tweeted about it. I have some friends who know Amanda through Brian Viglione, so they shared with me when the pics and story hit the web.

Posted by: KatSings at February 25, 2011 10:23 AM

Had me scared for a moment there, but wikipedia says Gaiman isn't a Scientologist now. And that means it must be true.

Posted by: Torint at February 25, 2011 10:23 AM

I kinda knew most of these on the list, but Gaiman surprised me. I didn't think Scientology was so old that he could be "born into it."

Posted by: Fredo at February 25, 2011 10:23 AM

I was disappointed to find that Tori Amos and Cat Power are Scientologists.

Posted by: Uda at February 25, 2011 10:24 AM

CAT POWER? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 25, 2011 10:25 AM

That bitch!

Posted by: Shonda at February 25, 2011 10:31 AM

Jason Dohring's Wikipedia page used to mention he was a Scientologist, yet no longer does so. I have hope.

Posted by: Circe at February 25, 2011 10:31 AM

Ha! Why thank you Joanna Robinson. I gladly accept the part of Crowley. But why can't I play it now? How old do I need to be?

When I win alla the Oscars, I will dedicate them to you.

Posted by: Caspar at February 25, 2011 10:31 AM

Posted by: Hakobus at February 25, 2011 10:33 AM

Gaiman left the CO$ in 1983 and was declared a Suppressive Person. He's never formally spoken about his experiences with the "church." As I understand it, his parents are still in, so that might have something to do with his silence.

Posted by: agent bedhead at February 25, 2011 10:35 AM

In a New Yorker interview in 2010, Gaiman said that he is no longer a Scientologist, but he has ties to it as some of his family members still are and because he identifies with anything being persecuted. Or something. I got to the part where he said he was no longer a Scientologist and I was so overwhelmed with relief that I can't remember what the rest of the article said about it.

Also, I misspelled Scientologist the first time as ScienTOOLogist (emphasis added) and I think I like that spelling better.

Posted by: Quorren at February 25, 2011 10:35 AM

Fredo - as it's already disappeared off the front page, I'll mention that over on Caspar's UK TV article, you'll find an apology from me to you.

[Imagine me doffing my cap to you right about now.]

Posted by: Simon at February 25, 2011 10:37 AM

Christ, give me a heart attack about Gaiman why don't you? Phew.

Posted by: Carrie at February 25, 2011 10:48 AM

Some days my life is so boring, and those are the days that I wish I was in a fucking cult or something. But the only problem with being in a cult is that if you’re not one of the top dogs you don’t get the Bono grade pussy. I mean you know, I’ve done some upper class fucking in my day. I’ve fucked a couple of teachers and once I fucked this lady that was an assistant manager of a JC Penny. But in the end you want to be able to leave a legacy of having done something profound.

Posted by: Pookie at February 25, 2011 10:49 AM

Feel compelled to mention (not as a defense of Scientology, which is indeed bugfuck crazy) that everything you say about it, you can say about almost every other religion also. Yes, everything. They're all guilty of exploiting people, abusing people, preying on people's emotional vulverability, etc. They all suck money out of their adherents. Scientoligists call it auditing or whatever, Christians call it tithing. They all encourage their believers to avoid or shun non-believers. They all have hierarchies that reward bad behavior (or at least punish it selectively) and discourage doubt and questioning authority.

Scientology is not uniquely nefarious or damaging. If people would stop saying that, maybe it would deprive Scientologists of their persecution complex, at least. If you treat Scientology as the silly psychological crutch that it is instead of some giant, threatening entity, maybe it would actually be less attractive to people.

What's amusing is how Scientologists actually seem to believe they've discovered something new. Sounds like the same old shit to me.

Posted by: Slash at February 25, 2011 10:55 AM

Tom fuckin' Cruise! There I said it. He is a great actor and we need him back. We want him back. But he needs our help. Tom I still looovvveee yooouuuu!

Posted by: Zeff at February 25, 2011 10:59 AM

Didn't Jason Lee pull co-star Ethan Suplee into the darkness, too? I seem to remember something along those lines.
It makes some sense, because the quivering spider-ball of Randy has to have stemmed from some real-world source...

Posted by: Barbaric Yawp at February 25, 2011 11:01 AM

*Crosses Tori Amos off to-do list*

Posted by: , at February 25, 2011 11:04 AM

Slash, sorry, but I can't be a relativist about these nutjobs. I'm Catholic and, while we do have our huge and oft-discussed problems, we have been around for centuries, have a long cultural history, and do not tithe (all donations are voluntary, though I think they do tithe in the cray-cray Opus Dei sect). Other legitimate religions - Judaism, Hinduism, Islam, hell even Mormonism - are engaged in the larger world. Scientology is all about the individual and has very little concern for larger issues.

It's known as a cult rather than a religion in other countries for a reason.

Posted by: samantha t at February 25, 2011 11:09 AM

I had no idea about Tori Amos. That's a real shame, because it now means I can no longer purchase any of her albums and I can't see her in concert. I vowed a long (very long) time ago that I would never knowingly allow even one penny of my own money to get anywhere near anything even remotely Scientological. And that's tough sometimes, since I live damn near down the road from them.

So, no paying for Tom Cruise or John Travolta movies (no great hardship there, I can't stand either one of them anyway). But I can still watch "My Name is Earl" on TV, since the money I pay for cable doesn't really go to Jason Lee (if I'm wrong about that, please don't tell me).

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at February 25, 2011 11:11 AM

Phew about Gainman, who is VERY relevant, BS!

Posted by: Magiel at February 25, 2011 11:14 AM

Well Barbaric Yawp, he did "pay for his Muppets and such", so it seems only fair that Ethan should give him a listen.

Slash -

1. It is the only so-called religion that makes you pay for enlightenment.

2. They have a church-wide official policy of attacking anyone who speaks out against them or seeks to investigate them.

3. They have a church member policy requiring adherents to deny all contact to anyone designated as suppressive to their participation in the cult.

4. They actively court celebrities to encourage enrollment of us regular folk.

5. They believe that there is no such thing as an accident or getting sick. Both of those things are a result of a Supressive Person's presence, so when you get sick, you have to figure out who it is that sent the negative vibes your way.

They are also elitist and anti-gay. They believe that psychiatry and psychology are evil. They would deny mentally-ill people the medications they need to be healthier.

Now as to the stuff that is like a regular religion (fairy tales, thetans, donations and such), I'd just file those portions under Cake, Sky.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 11:17 AM

I'm also bothered by Erica Christensen. I watch Parenthood and it bothers me every time she is on screen. She was also raised in the "church" too, so I guess that's her excuse.

Posted by: Austin at February 25, 2011 11:21 AM

I always found that very weird about Gaiman, considering how much he self-identifies as Jewish and growing up Jewish in England...

and yes, it breaks my heart about Jason Lee and Elisabeth Moss... sigh, why are the good ones always in a cult?

Posted by: jmd at February 25, 2011 11:26 AM

I didn't realise Jason Dohring was, ya know, one of them, but it totally makes sense.

I always got a creepy vibe from the guy but I'd just assumed it was because I didn't believe his whiny, self-entitled character deserved a sweet, sassy, smokin'-hot girl like Veronica ... and, um, perhaps my latent jealousy played a factor too!

Of course now I know for certain that I had every reason to be worried!

Those nutjobs transformed achingly pretty Katie Holmes into Skeletor.

I couldn't bare(or is it bear?) to see radiant Kristen morph into Mumra!

Posted by: Murderbot at February 25, 2011 11:32 AM

I hear all y'all on this, but my own personal distaste is more for the fact that Stephen Colbert is Catholic. My lady-boner goes flaccid every time he brings it up. In a do, dump, marry scenario he'd have to be "do in a frenzy of one-night passionate monkey sex." Which, ya know, would be fine with me.

Posted by: Sandisan at February 25, 2011 11:38 AM

"Scientology is not uniquely nefarious or damaging. If people would stop saying that, maybe it would deprive Scientologists of their persecution complex, at least. If you treat Scientology as the silly psychological crutch that it is instead of some giant, threatening entity..,"
Posted by: Slash at February 25, 2011 10:55 AM


Mmmm...yeah, about that:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freakout

http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/notice.cgi?NoticeID=232

What was that?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 25, 2011 11:46 AM

Slash I'm 100% with you. Scientology now is what Christianity (or any other major religion) was in its early beginning. Some of their practices are extreme, but comparable to for example, the severe practice of excommunication during the Middle Ages, it follows the same evolution pattern. I honestly think that if Scientology began before the recent technological breakthroughs, its acceptance would be much more extensive. Because, when you boil down any religion to its fundamental beginning, whether it’s a talking snake or a magic tree, it’s all irrational. Scientology suffers from its young age, not its beliefs.

Posted by: Scully at February 25, 2011 11:49 AM

That freaked me out. Actors aren't a big deal because I like them for pretending to be someone else, not for who they actually are. But Neil Gaiman's work has changed my life. Glad to see he's not into it anymore according to the comments.

And then there's the fact that while the organization is shady, I'm sure the average Scientologist is a fairly normal person who's into something that I'm not. So I have some prejudice to reign in.

Posted by: Lucas at February 25, 2011 11:49 AM

I was listening to the Rhandi Rhodes show one day and I’ll never forget what she said about getting to know personal things about your favorite entertainer. She said her biggest mistake was getting to know one of her favorite entertainers personally because it destroyed whatever fantasy she had built up about that person in her mind. Now when it comes to movie stars and their religions, I could care less, I don’t give a damn what they believe in. Tom Cruise could believe he came from Mars and I could care less, the only thing I care about is if Ethan Hunt can successfully complete his next mission because that’s what I paid to see him do.

Posted by: Pookie at February 25, 2011 11:55 AM

Fuck. Not Neil Gaiman!
I did not know that. Fuck man

Posted by: supafly at February 25, 2011 11:59 AM

Scully -

But aren't a lot of the "evolution patterns" of other religions now derided and regarded as anathema to their own doctrine? Is it logical to say that early Christians acted in a barbarous manner that it makes sense for a new religion to do so?

I'll see your talking snakes and magical trees and raise you an Operating Thetan III.

Colbert's devout Catholicism makes me uncomfortable too, but at least he is openly critical of his own church without fear of reprisal.


Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 12:00 PM

Scully - I was a little inflammatory up there with "makes sense for a new religion to do so". What I really meant was that Scientology acts in a medieval fashion in the 21st century. And, I must add, a lot of their beliefs make about as much sense as the ones people had 600 or 700 years ago. I know I have trouble with people who take the Bible literally and I have enough trouble to go around for anyone who takes all of a religion's mythos literally. Of course, in all cases except Scientology, I can learn the fairy tales for free.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 12:12 PM

Simon, no need, but thanks. This is the Internet after all.

Posted by: Fredo at February 25, 2011 12:20 PM

Poor Jason Lee.

Ugh. Seriously what is wrong with these people. It is so fucking backwards I just don't get it.

Posted by: grace b at February 25, 2011 12:22 PM

They're no different from any other celebrities that follow any other religion.

But that's just me.

....

Posted by: MissRos at February 25, 2011 12:23 PM

Gaiman? Whaa?? Though now my faith is restored to see he has since left the fold.

Juliette Lewis must renounce if she is ever to become my BFF in reality (and not just in my slighly feverish daydreams).

Posted by: Bumwee McGee at February 25, 2011 12:26 PM

"You face forward or you face the possibility of shock and damage!"

Xenu, Warrior Princess

Posted by: superasente at February 25, 2011 1:07 PM

@Circe - Dohring gave an interview just a couple of years ago to Scientology's 'Celebrity' magazine (they don't even make a secret of the fact that they actively recruit high profile members, do they?) and it's full of COS jargon. Chills, chills, chills. [url]http://www.scientology.cc/articles/804291221291.vm[/url].

I have to admit I'm disappointed when anyone I like turns out to be an ardent follower of any religion (Zach Levi from 'Chuck' comes to mind). I try not to be judgmental, but as an atheist whose closest thing to a favorite sermon is Patton Oswalt's 'Sky Cake' bit, it's really difficult for me to reconcile blind faith and intelligence in people I admire, so I try to ignore it as best I can where possible. Just typing that, I'm sure I'm offending some fellow Pajibans, and that's honestly not my intention - just sharing my two cents. Having grown up Catholic, many of my friends still believe and we manage to make it work. And hey, they used to equate atheism with devil worship, so I don't feel too badly about my inner conflict.

That being said, Beck, Juliette Lewis, the Ribisi twins, Jason Lee, Jennifer Aspen and Erica Chirstensen all break my heart. And Katie Holmes, because I feel like she's been in a prolonged hostage situation for the past however many years. I had no idea Laura Prepon was one (according to Wikipedia). Cruise is batshit in all respects, and I just feel sorry for Travolta. I hope one day he's able to break off and lets his freak flag fly.

Posted by: Nicole at February 25, 2011 1:14 PM

Slash and Scully, I agree with you about Scientology and other religions. As an atheist, I find its beliefs no more or less "weird" than any other religion. However, I do think that they have some awful practices and policies that are borderline (or maybe even frankly) criminal. Some other religions do, too, but that doesn't make Scientology's abuses any better.

Posted by: GeekChic at February 25, 2011 1:14 PM

Trying again with the Dohring interview:

http://www.scientology.cc/articles/804291221291.vm

Posted by: Nicole at February 25, 2011 1:16 PM

RE Mrs. Julien:

1. It is the only so-called religion that makes you pay for enlightenment.
2. They have a church-wide official policy of attacking anyone who speaks out against them or seeks to investigate them.
3. They have a church member policy requiring adherents to deny all contact to anyone designated as suppressive to their participation in the cult.
4. They actively court celebrities to encourage enrollment of us regular folk.
5. They believe that there is no such thing as an accident or getting sick. Both of those things are a result of a Supressive Person's presence, so when you get sick, you have to figure out who it is that sent the negative vibes your way. They are also elitist and anti-gay. They believe that psychiatry and psychology are evil. They would deny mentally-ill people the medications they need to be healthier.


All things that can be said of every other religion. Seriously, only the names are different. The concepts are the same. I know enough about the history of other religions to know that Scientology didn't invent any of this shit.

Yes, Scientology is a steaming load. So are all the others. That was my point. None of the shit they do is new. Some of it is terrible, yes, but nothing that other cults/religions haven't done before (or are doing now).

I'd like to abolish the tax-free status of every church. But it's not gonna happen anytime soon.

I read somewhere that the difference between a religion and a cult is about 100 years. Christianity started out as a cult. Now look at it. Same with all the others. They started out as a new thing that supplanted the dumb shit (polytheism, mostly) that people came up with to explain away evil and unfortunate natural disasters like floods and famines. Their explanations didn't make any more sense but were more attractive to people for one reason or another.

Posted by: Slash at February 25, 2011 1:21 PM

I second the Masterson. Both Chris and Danny would be much more bangable without the Scientology thing.

Posted by: Jerry at February 25, 2011 1:23 PM

Oh, Jason Dohring. Why must you break my heart?

Posted by: Mel C. at February 25, 2011 1:37 PM

But.. but...it is different. That's the issue.

Nevermind. I can't discuss something, if you refuse to acknowledge reason; furthermore, just because you are democratically-entitled to have an opinion does not automatically make your conclusions correct.


Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 1:52 PM

But aren't a lot of the "evolution patterns" of other religions now derided and regarded as anathema to their own doctrine?

Oh absolutely. I'm sure the same will be the case for Scientology.

I wasn't defending Scientology. Some of their practices are batshit insane. I simply like to point out that at an early age all religions are crazy. On a historical scale Scientology is very young, and I think that explains (but does not excuse) the more perplexing practices.

Posted by: Scully at February 25, 2011 2:00 PM

wow, Neil Gaiman wasn't just born into scientology, his father was a hoity toit in scientology's intelligence bureau:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gaiman

creepy creepy creepy

Posted by: idleprimate at February 25, 2011 3:05 PM

They all encourage their believers to avoid or shun non-believers.

I don't think I've ever been seriously encouraged to do either of those things.

And I think there are way more subtleties (geographic, historical, etc.) between "Early Chrstians" and "Modern Christians." I'd venture to say that a lot of those groups would resent getting lumped in with a lot of the others. Insert whatever other religion you so desire.

Posted by: coryo at February 25, 2011 3:33 PM

RE Julien: "But.. but...it is different. That's the issue. Nevermind. I can't discuss something, if you refuse to acknowledge reason; furthermore, just because you are democratically-entitled to have an opinion does not automatically make your conclusions correct."


No, it isn't different. See, I can do it, too.

I guess you're right, you can't discuss something.

It's cool. I don't need you to agree with me. I'm not a Scientologist. I don't need someone to parrot my conclusions back to me for me to have confidence in them. You can think the Scientologists are a unique evil all you want. It's a (semi) free country.

It is amusing how religious adherents (not that I assume you are one, just making an observation) are so blind to the shortcomings of their own religious traditions, and at the same time so dead set against those of another religion. Just because Christianity no longer does (openly and in a widespread manner) what Scientology does now doesn't mean it isn't also harmful. When Scientology gets the support of powerful government interests in order to enforce their goofy world view, then I'll worry about them. When Scientology gets various school boards to approve or reject textbooks because they follow/don't follow Scientology's tenets, I'll worry. When our government makes L. Ron Hubbard's birthday a national holiday, I'll share other people's concerns about it. Until then, I can't agree that they are worse than the others.

Posted by: Slash at February 25, 2011 4:07 PM

Mrs. Julien-- I both love and adore you. Were I not "that way," I would offer to sire your offspring.

Posted by: The Gay at February 25, 2011 4:08 PM

two turntables and an audit machine.... makes me so sad.


I also wish Will Smith weren't one. They can keep his kids and wife, just give me Big Willy.

Posted by: JuiceinLA at February 25, 2011 4:10 PM

Oh Slash, I knew you would turn my comment back on me, but that was part of the fun. It doesn't make either of us any less right (or wrong). I was kind of hoping you would call me something nasty so I could retort, "I'm a heartless creature, but that's part of my charm." Phooey on you for not taking the bait. PHOOEY! I say. And now I'm going to stick out my tongue at you. (If anyone knows how to do that in HTML tags, I would be extremely grateful (but likely to overindulge in them)).

And you know, The Gay, I'm pretty sure Scientology promises that it can in fact make you "that way". You decide if it's worth it and let me know.


Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 4:37 PM

jesus christ, NEIL GAIMAN?!?!?! (which can be read two ways, now that i think of it.)

this makes me very, very sad.

Posted by: matty blue at February 25, 2011 4:58 PM

Elisabeth Moss too? Nooooooooooooooo.

Posted by: Sage at February 25, 2011 5:03 PM

"It is amusing how religious adherents (not that I assume you are one, just making an observation) are so blind to the shortcomings of their own religious traditions, and at the same time so dead set against those of another religion."

I find it amusing how atheists like yourself consistently lump religions together, i.e. "Christianity", as though there weren't Baptists, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, etc. - all with quite different dogma (jury's still out as to whether Catholics are Christians, which conveniently permits me to disavow any connection to the fundies - yay!). I find it equally amusing that atheists like yourself consider all religions "equally crazy." How intellectually convenient and, frankly, lazy.

I am not blind to my religion's shortcomings and happily acknolwedge the integrity of other religions (even if I don't believe in them). I, along with many, many others, consider Scientology to be more of a cult than anything else.

Posted by: samantha t at February 25, 2011 5:37 PM

Neil Gaiman? Are you fucking kidding me? NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Posted by: vllach at February 25, 2011 5:52 PM

Sorry...

Posted by: vllach at February 25, 2011 5:54 PM

Neil Gaiman identifies as an athiest. It's not his fault his father was a crazy man! So he's no more a Scientologist than I am a Jew (actually, I'm probably more Jewish. I fasted this year and everything!)

But Elizabeth Moss? WHAT WOULD PEGGY SAY?

Posted by: esme at February 25, 2011 6:07 PM

RE samantha t
I find it amusing how atheists like yourself consistently lump religions together, i.e. "Christianity", as though there weren't Baptists, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, etc. - all with quite different dogma (jury's still out as to whether Catholics are Christians, which conveniently permits me to disavow any connection to the fundies - yay!). I find it equally amusing that atheists like yourself consider all religions "equally crazy." How intellectually convenient and, frankly, lazy.

The dogma all looks the same to me. You may think the differences are significant, but to me, they're not. In the least. When I see/hear religious people having a discussion/debate/argument about some point of religious dogma, it sounds exactly the same to me as when I hear nerds arguing about the lesser-known plot points of "Star Wars" or "Star Trek."

And they are all also equally crazy, in the sense that they encourage belief in things that don't exist for the promise of everlasting life or somesuch. Whether the power they worship is named God or Jesus or Yahweh or L. Ron Hubbard, or whoever, it's equally nonsensical to me. I certainly don't expect you to agree. Most religious people (or people who claim religious beliefs) can't be expected to react well when someone tells them their beliefs are silly. What's really lazy is believing something simply because other people have told you it is so, but if that's what you want to do with your time, cool.

Posted by: Slash at February 25, 2011 6:50 PM

" Most religious people (or people who claim religious beliefs) can't be expected to react well when someone tells them their beliefs are silly. What's really lazy is believing something simply because other people have told you it is so, but if that's what you want to do with your time, cool."


I think what religious people object to is some smug jerk who plainly knows very little about religion (as evidenced by your saying "the dogma all looks the same to me) baselessly telling us our beliefs are "silly."

Posted by: samantha t at February 25, 2011 6:58 PM

Thunderdome!

Posted by: idleprimate at February 25, 2011 7:06 PM

Round One...FIGHT!

Posted by: TylerDFC at February 25, 2011 7:12 PM

I'd be a lot more understanding of Gaiman no longer being in the church but keeping silent for his family's sake if it weren't for for the fact that he donates unholy sums of money to them (and that the Scientology donor lists don't include people who later left the church). And that at least as late as in the mid-oughts he was still listed as a Patron, which is only for high-ranking members in the church, even though he claims to have left in the early 80s. And that he's allowed to see his family at all, when the normal methodology is to cut people off when they leave.

Gaiman's still a Scientologist. I may think Tom Cruise is, well, Tom Cruise Crazy, but at least he's honest about it.

Posted by: Shadowen at February 25, 2011 7:20 PM

Jeez, man, what a mean article. 1) what does someone's religion have to do with their art? 2) You just automatically believe Everything in that new yorker piece as gospel? 3) You devalue the intelligence of the people you supposedly admire in this article by saying "I can't enjoy what they do because of their choice of religion." Wow. Using that logic, should we devalue Gandhi because he was Hindu? Which you nor I happen to be and what a weird religion, etc... Jesus, where's the intellect gone? Doesn't anyone care about individuality or constitutional rights? I'm blow away. I'm a beck fan, I'm NOT a scientologist for the record, and I'm offended...why would you write such a mean shortsighted unintelligent article?

Posted by: Ian at February 25, 2011 7:26 PM

except scientology isn't a religion, it's a weird, paranoid money grubbing cult

Posted by: idleprimate at February 25, 2011 7:35 PM

"religious dogma, it sounds exactly the same to me as when I hear nerds arguing about the lesser-known plot points of "Star Wars" or "Star Trek."


Romulan Birds-of-Prey HAD no warp drive when they first encountered the Federation, everybody, who isn't an idiot, knows that.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 25, 2011 7:37 PM

Here, if you love discrimination, stereotyping, and religious hatred as much as you love this article, you'll love this site http://www.juedisches-museum-berlin.de/typisch/home_eng.html

Posted by: Benia at February 25, 2011 7:38 PM

I agree that scientology is weird, paranoid and money-grubbing. I do not agree that these qualities preclude them from being a religion.

Posted by: superasente at February 25, 2011 7:43 PM

The absolute one shall cull the 48° masses of ignorant cloud-worshippers! Beware ye deceivers, beware those who would employ hollow technology and glitzy movie 52′ icons to sell false prophets! Your perception of reality is chained and prisonered by the 36″S pathetic and infinitesimal window to which your mind's eye can see.

HE waits in 123° the unconscience abyssal plain to unbind your thin-threaded fates! The green, sticky spawn of the stars will SWOOP DOWN FROM THE COSMIC WINDS ON SMALL, BUT STILL VERY CAPABLE 23′ WINGS! HE WILL TURN THE CARPENTER-WORSHIPER'S WORLD INTO ONE OF PRIMORDIAL PURITY IN CHAOS! AWAY WITH YOUR CORPOREAL IDOLS! AWAY WITH YOUR 36″W ECCLESIASTICAL TRADITIONS, SO YOUNG THEY ARE BUT A NEWBORN BABE TO THE WEATHERED EYE OF TIME! PINK-FLESHED COWS! EUCLIDIAN CONQUERED INGORAMII!


CTHULHU FHTAGN! CTHULHU FHTAGN! CTHULHU FHTAGN! CTHULHU FHTAGN! CTHULHU FHTAGN! CTHULHU FHTAGN! CTHULHU FHTAGN! CTHULHU FHTAGN!

Posted by: Baba O'R'lyeh at February 25, 2011 8:06 PM

What do you call a church without a pope?


A cult.

Posted by: Diablo at February 25, 2011 8:28 PM

Can someone explain to me how Scientology is even a religion? It seems to fit the characteristics of a cult.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at February 25, 2011 8:37 PM

If your gospel was written by some third-rate Sci-Fi author, you might probably be in a cult.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 25, 2011 8:41 PM

Neil Gaiman? I was unaware.

Elizabeth Moss hurts the most. Look at that goofy picture. She's spectacular! I adore her.

Posted by: greer at February 25, 2011 8:43 PM

@superasente, with respect, because you always seem an erudite dude,

In university, I was taught that religion fulfills two functions: fascilitating community and addressing death. the fuckwit scientologists do neither. in fact they do the opposite.

I'm not a big fan of much religious history, and I am often confused about seemingly fantastical beliefs. and my own religious sensibility has never found a proper home.

But i do believe there is a basic human drive that manifests in religion and scientology does not qualify.

Posted by: idleprimate at February 25, 2011 9:10 PM

uhm... how did Jeffrey Tambor not make this list?

Posted by: causaubon at February 25, 2011 9:16 PM

on an non-argumentary note, I am severely crushed at the comment above about Gaiman, who supposedly left the church long ago remaining on a patron list and donating large sums of money. i don't even know if it is true, but I have spent a lot of money on Gaiman's work, movies, books, comics, fancy collections of comics, never thinking that it was being funneled into a nasty cult.

I actually don't know what to think about this. does anyone know if it is true?

Posted by: idleprimate at February 25, 2011 9:22 PM

"People We Wish Weren't Jews Because We Really Like Them"

Or Muslims, or Christians, or Jains or Scientologists.
Doesn't anyone else see the problem with this article?

Posted by: Meredith at February 25, 2011 9:27 PM

Just popping in to say that "Ian" above is not the regular, Me, Ian Moore. I already rode this merry go round on the last FAITH WAAAAAR

Posted by: IAN at February 25, 2011 9:34 PM

Fake Ian: YOU ARE FAKE.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at February 25, 2011 9:41 PM

IAN - Whew!

Posted by: Lainey at February 25, 2011 9:55 PM

Gaiman is a practising Scientologist and the heir to a multi-million dollar G&G vitamin fortune founded by his parents. (He will NEVER come out and admit his ties to the cult publicly - too much money at stake to lose). G&G and David Gaiman were investigated during the Chernobyl disaster for experimenting with vitamin treatments gone awry for children who were injured during Chernobyl. Gaiman's sister Lizzy Calcioli in East Grinstead is the HEAD of RECRUITING for Scientology worldwide. Amanda Palmer - Gaiman's (wife? who knows really) is also from a rooted Scientologist family. These two have made it a priority to reach out to teenagers and other susceptible youngsters. Keep investigating their deep ties to the cult of Scientology - there is a LOT more darkness there.

Posted by: CB at February 25, 2011 10:39 PM

ok, I am all for internet chatter, but can you provide anything vaguely supporting the claims that Neil gaiman is a scientologist, let alone the allegations that hi embroiled in some big financial embroglio?

am I alone here being freaked out, Pajibans?

Troll? Truth?

I very seriously adore all his work,and am very upset at this possibility.

Posted by: idleprimate at February 25, 2011 11:22 PM

@Idleprimate Take your head out of your ass and do some research - David Gaiman, Lizzy Calcioli, East Grinstead, G&G Vitamins, Chernobyl, exclusive Vitamin suppliers for Scientology, David Miscavige and Neil Gaiman. Look at the Scientology patronage/donor lists. Neil's not gonna come out and tell you, you know.

He'll never come out and say he's not a Scientologist. (He's reading this thread now.) He can't or won't - he'll link to something or offer a carefully-worded, evasive denial. He and Amanda are trying to have it both ways - huge Scientology-ginned up audiences without accountability for cult-involvement and the horrible consequences.

Posted by: Josh at February 25, 2011 11:43 PM

Meredith,

In answer to your question: Nope. Nada. Pas de chose. Aucun. Rien. Absolutely not. Unequivocally no. I should say not.

Kisses,
Mrs. Julien

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at February 25, 2011 11:45 PM

well, friendly fuckbag Josh, I'm sorry my head was up my ass, that happens sometimes when you aren't chasing conspiracy theories.

i didn't fight any fact, I asked for confirmation.

You may know more than i do, or you may be shouting bull puckey, but you are a fucking asshole for shitting on me for asking a question, so in the most polite manner i can assume, fuck yourself.

Wait, that was to quiet and composed, GO FUCK YOURSELF. there, that's better.

Posted by: idleprimate at February 25, 2011 11:48 PM

This is entirely off-subject but to whomever said the jury was out as to whether Catholics are Christian: it is not. In fact, there is no jury. There never was. Catholicism is a denomination of Christianity. I am Christian, my denomination is Catholic. I could go into a long explanation for you but it's late and I'd like to catch some shut-eye while the baby is sleeping, so I'm going to let this man explain for me:

http://www.davidmacd.com/catholic/are_catholics_christian.htm

Apologies if that does not come through as a link. I'm posting using my phone while laying in bed. Anyway, just because some Protestants (not *all*, but *some*, so don't anyone get their panties in a wad) are prejudiced against Catholics doesn't mean they can swap out fact for truthiness.

Now, please carry on with the discussion about Scientology.

Posted by: stardust at February 25, 2011 11:50 PM

@Idleprimate Sorry kiddo - that was really uncalled for - long day. But I urge you to do some research on your own - it's all out there in the public domain you know. Lots and lots of deflecting, conjurer's smoke from the Gaiman/Palmer camp - but people are getting curious about the extent of their involvement with the cult. Really curious.

Posted by: Josh at February 26, 2011 12:00 AM

Here's the main difference between $cientology and the other major religions of the world: they don't - WON'T - tell you what they believe in up front. Go into any christian church, to a synagogue, to a buddhist temple, and ask about what they believe. They'll lay it all out for you. In $cientology, you have to reach OT III - which I believe costs about $100,000 in 'courses' and auditing, before you find out about Xenu and the volcanoes. And then you can't discuss it - the Xenu thing - with anyone, including other members of the 'church' for reasons that I think are pretty obvious.

And he seems like a nice guy, and I feel sorry about Jett.

A nice guy, especially one with lots of money, would have gotten his autistic son medical help, instead of pumping him full of vitamins that did nothing to help his neurological condition.

Posted by: Kristen from MA at February 26, 2011 12:13 AM

If you haven't already found it, you could start here, idleprimate. There's some chatter to sift through and they have some external links. I wouldn't say it's exactly concrete evidence, though.

And to clarify, I should have said that Tori Amos and Cat Power are alleged members. Tori admits to taking their courses and such, but denies any affiliation now. Cat Power is just presumed to be one because she was (or still is) dating Giovanni Ribisi and toured with Juliette Lewis.

Meredith, have you read any of the incriminating reports? Are you familiar with the Rehabilitation Project Force? Have you ever heard of Lisa McPherson or Uwe Stuckenbrock? Do you know what the accusations are against David Miscavige? Did you know about the Scientologists in France who were convicted of fraud? This is a bit more complicated than not liking someone because they don't have the same religion as you. This is about avoiding giving money to people who are funding a cult that does terrible things to its non-celebrity members. I apologize in advance if this comes off rude or hostile, as these threads tend to get heated. There's just a lot of information that puts Scientology in pretty stark contrast to other religions.

Posted by: Uda at February 26, 2011 12:30 AM

It's as if all of these marginally talented people - Gaiman, Lee et al sold their souls, critical faculties, intelligence for success (or some form of success). They all look so lost. Xenu - the new Faustian bargain.

Posted by: Jane at February 26, 2011 12:31 AM

hey josh, thanks for being really nice about my own rash outburst, and apologies for insults. I'm still looking into it.

Posted by: idleprimate at February 26, 2011 12:32 AM

@ idleprimate

try Googling 'Operation Snow White.'

Posted by: Kristen from MA at February 26, 2011 1:46 AM

unfortunately I have been reading entirely too much about scientology 'operations'. its all horrifying.

it still doesn't clarify Neil

Posted by: idleprimate at February 26, 2011 5:11 AM

I just went on a rollercoaster through the comments about Gaiman.

Holy shit he is a Scientologist?

Whew, he's not.

Wait, he is and he and his wife are trying to scam us??

Now I just don't know what to think

Posted by: mswas at February 26, 2011 5:21 AM

I think two of the things that should be immediate red flags to anybody glancing at Scientology are:-

Continually asserting their designs on conquering the world and introducing LRH tech to every svhool on the planet

Continually asserting their desire to destroy psychiatry and crush everybody in the medically legitimate mental health fields.

ALARM ALARM. CULT DETECTED. ALARM ALARM.

Posted by: Murderbot at February 26, 2011 7:49 AM

"Xenu,Warrior Princess"....heheheheh!

Posted by: wileE at February 26, 2011 9:22 AM

Jury's still out as to whether Catholics are Christians.

Someone wrote that above. It made me laugh. Because no it isn't, and anyone who says differently lacks even the most basic understanding of Christian beliefs. Until Catholics start chanting CTHULHU FHTAGN like our resident Zeppellin fan, then yes -- they're Christian.

Y'know, religious debates are fun. But only when you're not debating with complete fucking idiots.

Posted by: superasente at February 26, 2011 10:20 AM

I've got nothing to say bit that I concur that Scientology is a cult and it seems like a bad movie plot that a sci-fi writer start a religion based on his book.

I's also like to add that I very much enjoy religious and political debates here at Pajiba. Many of the comments are thoughtful, smart and I learn something new in every one. Like who Neil Gaiman is.

Posted by: TWoP_Fan at February 26, 2011 12:25 PM

Gaiman has NOT left Scientology. If he had, he would be disconnected from his siblings who are high up in the cult. In Scientology you are either IN or OUT, and Gaiman is IN!

Neil Gaiman is underwriting Scientology. The Scientologist’s list Neil Gaiman in the Cornerstone Newsletter along with Mary Gaiman, as contributing $35,000.00 in 2009. Being listed in the Cornerstone Newsletter means you are in good-standing with the cult.

In 2010, Mary Gaiman was awarded the "Gold Humanitarian Award" for her contribution of $500,000.00 to Scientology. This is significant because Mary Gaiman continues to be Neil Gaiman’s business partner in The Blank Corporation, which is now Neil Gaiman's Scientology front and how he pays the cult.

Gaiman is also the "Vitamin Heir" of Scientology. The Gaiman family owns G&G Vitamins which reaps 6 million a year from selling The Purification Rundown Vitamins.

Gaiman's two sisters, Claire Edwards and Lizzie Calciole are not just high-ranking Scientologists, they are the head of RECRUITING and the head of Wealden House, the Scientology stronghold in East Grinstead. These two cannot associate with Neil unless he is in good standing.

Amanda Palmer would not be allowed anywhere near this royal family of Scientology unless she was also a Scientologist.

Posted by: Mest at February 26, 2011 1:44 PM

Scientologists deny being Scientologists all the time, while secretly funding the Cult. Cruise hid his association and though he's taken all the courses, his name is hidden on the lists. Beck denied it until he was outed by a reporter and Will Smith denied it by request of the movie studio that produced Hancock.

Gaiman funds Scientology through his business partner in The Blank Corporation, Mary Gaiman. Gaimans siblings are both high ranking executives and Gaiman attends the Freewinds cruises and is given an allowance from G&G Vitamins.

Gaiman was fawned over by Scientology bloggers before he had the material removed to keep his status hidden.

Gaiman was photographed at Scientology gatherings at Wealden House.http://www.scientology-london.com/beta/files/leaked-neil-gaiman-backstage-colbert-report-and-links-wealden-house-life-improvement-centre.php

Gaiman's denial to the BBC was fumbled when he said "But, I mean... I love my family." Meaning he is contolled by them.

Gaimans own parents, David and Sheila Gaiman, schooled all Scientologists and Neil Gaiman about how to lie to, confuse and attack reporters and how to conceal being a Sceintologist if it will interfere with amassing money and power: http://www.solitarytrees.net/racism/reporter.htm

Posted by: Truthteller at February 26, 2011 2:05 PM

Let's calm down, shall we? Can this not become a "9/11 was an inside job" (it might have been) or a Zionist conspiracy (not happening). I think attacking/boycotting everything these people do is tantamount to blaming every Christian for the Inquisition, every protestant for the Nazis. Some of these people were born in, some joined up, but they are simply members of a church. 90% of people don't join religions or organizations in order to take over the world. I think the pope and his cronies are deluded, possibly awful people. My family are Catholic. They are not deranged or power-mad. They are just people trying to get through the day. For some, much like Mormonism or Jehovah's Witnesses, the "curing" gay thing was the attraction. The need to be someone else. For others, the anti-reporter message is attractive. The paparazzi and news, and yes, critics pick apart your life and your already fragile ego until someone comes along and tells you "yes, those are the bad guys. Come with us and we'll make you safe." You can show me all the documentation you want, I will not blame Beck or Neil Gaiman for being born into any church. And let's stop using the word "cult", shall we--the only difference between a cult and a religion is political power, which Scientology has shown it possesses, therefore it is a religion. Mormonism is just as crazy, just as restrictive, and shares most of the tenants we have problems with: anti-gay, controlling, in order to leave you must cut ties to your entire family, as well as having a strange space alien story at its heart. But we aren't talking about them. Why? Because Mormons are so much better at hiding, mostly by being boring? Or are all the stories about Mormons lies or hyperbole? In that case, may I suggest that the conspiracy crafters calm down, as much of what they think they know is just the same anti-Zion message applied to whatever new religion is threatening whatever lies you tell yourself so you can handle your own mortality and the fact that we are most likely alone in the universe. I'm glad the truth is coming out about Scientology's violent and restrictive practices, but if it is an evil, nefarious cult, then its members are victims, each and every one, and their mental health is in the hands of those who were victimized before them. Just like Jews, Christians and Muslims. They may have calmed down recently, but when they were the age Scientology is, they were wiping out anyone who worshipped something else. At least Tom Cruise hasn't declared war on the Angel Moroni. Yet.

Posted by: puppetDoug at February 26, 2011 5:11 PM

I make it personal policy to boycott and steer friends away from ANYTHING and ANYONE remotely associated any Sciento cult asshole.

/FUCK BECK
//FUCK JULIETTE LEWIS
///AND FUCK FUNBOY CRUISE

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 26, 2011 7:44 PM

Niel Gaiman? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

why?
how?
why?

Posted by: she at February 26, 2011 7:45 PM

Interesting - ALL of the comments on SPIN's coverage of Amanda Palmer and Gaiman including those regarding their Scientologist involvement have been removed and the commenting function disabled as of tonight. Reckon they'll try to do the same here at Pajiba. Question - will Pajiba succumb to the Gaiman pressure and strongarm suppressive legal tactics?

Posted by: JEM at February 26, 2011 11:42 PM

My comment got eaten by Godtopus, but I think it was a little link-happy so I'll try this again with just one external link instead:

puppetDoug, a couple of things that sets Scientology and other fringe cults apart from religion is brainwashing and their own private lexicon. To completely dismiss the research of reporters and people who have studied the subject at length as being a bunch of conspiracy theorists is disingenuous.

Nobody is blaming the celebrities for direct responsibility and most of us are aware that they are victims too. The problem is that a lot of the money that comes from their fans goes directly to Scientology. And thanks to inurement that money benefits David Miscavige.

If one were to weigh the facts and decide against supporting the work of people who belong to an organization that they believe to be harmful that is their right. This discussion isn't just limited to Scientology either, there just happens to be a lot of publicity surrounding that particular group because of Paul Haggis' recent departure. If there is another dangerous group that has a bunch of celebrities who are funding them, then by all means, let us know. It's not as though this website hasn't hosted discussions regarding religion or politics or whether or not we feel we should support the work of anti-semites or pedophiles.

idleprimate, I think one of the problems surrounding Gaiman is that most people take his silence as compliance. He's clearly not an SP, otherwise he wouldn't have contact with his family, but he would have a lot to lose if he were to openly speak out against them. Haggis had the advantage of his family being on the outs with Scientology and doesn't seem afraid of their retaliation.

JEM, popular websites owned by certain companies that say anything potentially critical of Scientology often have that information pulled. There used to be a really interesting article on the Rolling Stone website that got into the history of L. Ron Hubbard that was removed some time in the past year or two. I have some excerpts saved somewhere, but now I can't reference the page. So it's not as though it's limited to Gaiman.

Posted by: Uda at February 27, 2011 12:28 AM

@Uda While I have some measure of sympathy for Scientologists who are reluctant to denounce the cult for fear of being cut off from their families, Gaiman occupies very precarious ethical territory.

He is a beneficiary of a fortune derived in large part from providing Scientologists with vitamins for the purification regimen. Gaiman enjoys an exceptionally comfortable lifestyle (millions annually, lots of very expensive toys and country homes, luxury hotels etc. etc.) sustained in large part by this affiliation. He is complicit in this and should be held to account.

He and Palmer have made strategic outreach to young, vulnerable fans a priority in order to heighten their profiles and to grease the wheels for additional monies from a younger generation - the prior one having moved on as they realize the utter emptiness and laughability of the Palmer/Gaiman offerings.

Posted by: JEM at February 27, 2011 2:16 AM

Scientology is not a religion, it is a business. A religion is where the people worhip a higher power. I don't think David Miscavige qualifies.

Posted by: jan at February 27, 2011 5:48 PM

Don't think Laura Prepon is in the cult anymore. She and Chris Masterson broke up so I think the blinders were removed.

Posted by: jan at February 27, 2011 5:49 PM

A church with a pope is a cult. A cult is an organized religion that centers around one person as its leader/godhead. Catholicisms worship of the pope equal to Branch Davidians worship of David Koresh.

Posted by: Scott at February 28, 2011 12:19 AM

I heard at at party recently from an ex-very very very high up player in the CO$ (he had been in the Sea Org,very hush hush, where they float around on a boat) that there is a HUGH scandale brewing about how David Miscaviage has caused irreparable and completely unforgivable, and most likely incomprehensible batshit crazy to us earthlings, harm to many bigshot untouchables in the cult and that the shit, praise XENU

Posted by: devildoggie at March 2, 2011 4:06 AM

I heard at at party recently from an ex-very very very high up player in the CO$ (he had been in the Sea Org,very hush hush, where they float around on a boat) that there is a HUGH scandale brewing about how David Miscaviage has caused irreparable and completely unforgivable, and most likely incomprehensible batshit crazy to us earthlings, harm to many bigshot untouchables in the cult and that the shit, praise XENU

Posted by: devildoggie at March 2, 2011 4:10 AM

I heard at at party recently from an ex-very very very high up player in the CO$ (he had been in the Sea Org,very hush hush, where they float around on a boat) that there is a HUGH scandale brewing about how David Miscaviage has caused irreparable and completely unforgivable, and most likely incomprehensible batshit crazy to us earthlings, harm to many bigshot untouchables in the cult and that the shit, praise XENU

Posted by: devildoggie at March 2, 2011 4:15 AM

Sorry times 3. I quit. The last phrase is 'gonna hit the fan'. Take me, L.Ron.

Posted by: devildoggie at March 2, 2011 4:18 AM

We should some radio silence from Gaiman and drag queen Palmer as they enjoy some Freewinds. Amen.

Posted by: KGB at March 4, 2011 5:30 AM

Donors, including the often more gift receipt only if received. The recipient can duplicate items in the store for a refund or exchange. Take time to find the perfect bag for the best possible price.

Posted by: Knockoff Designer Handbags at March 24, 2011 10:37 PM

Very nice blog.I like this and will come back very soon.

Posted by: Carroll B. Merriman at April 2, 2011 8:26 PM

For every woman who is their wedding day one of the biggest days of his life. Inevitably, they want everything to be perfect. These include possible under the best Fashion Knock Off Handbags . If this woman can even select a celebrity wedding hairstyles. Although it seems difficult to fill, do not worry. It¡¯s not as bad as you might think.

Posted by: Fashion Knock Off Handbags at April 13, 2011 5:05 AM

This is getting a bit more subjective, however this is a great blog.keep up the good work.

Posted by: Hipolito M. Wiseman at April 13, 2011 9:42 PM

Nice website, i like the way you write. Have a nice day.

Posted by: Sofia Rapoza at April 17, 2011 5:30 PM

Creo que tu punto de vista es bueno me agradaria conocer del tema , buen trabajo

Posted by: videos espanol at April 21, 2011 12:52 PM

You really make it seem very easy with your presentation but I've found this topic to become actually something which I believe I would never understand.

Posted by: wardrobe storage at April 24, 2011 6:09 AM