![]()
Mommie Queerest
Savage Grace / Nathaniel Rogers
They say that the only sure things in life are death and taxes. But when it comes to the movies there are several sure things. Among them: If a gun is shown in the first act, it has to go off on in the third; the villain who just collapsed is not quite dead yet; those beautiful co-stars that fall in hate at first sight will fall into each other’s arms passionately by the time the credits roll; and if Julianne Moore is the star of the movie, the kids are not all right. If Julianne Moore is the star of the movie, her kids will end up abandoned (The Hours, Boogie Nights), brain-damaged (The Shipping News), imaginary, missing or possibly dead (A Map of the World, The Forgotten, Children of Men, The Hours, World Traveler and Freedomland). Moviegoers first noticed her as the sassy best friend in The Hand That Rocks the Cradle (1992), but who knew that endangered or damaged children would become such an inescapable motif in her career?
You’re forgiven, then, for feeling queasy during Savage Grace’s otherwise innocent-looking opener, in which the great actress is shown cradling her infant son and cooing at him gently. It would seem sweet and hopeful were it not for the familiar bad-mother face doing the cooing. I’d tell the child to run quickly away, but this smothered and wriggly thing can’t even crawl yet. He’s surely doomed spiritually even if he’s going to survive the movie physically. That’s him in voiceover as an adult telling us about his parents, the Baekalands.
Savage Grace is a shocking true crime story based on the book of the same name by Natalie Robins and Steven M. L. Aronson. The parents are wealthy chilly millionaire Brooks Baekaland (the reliably excellent Stephen Dillane) and his passionate upwardly mobile wife, Barbara (Moore). The infant is Tony, their only child. Barbara’s coddling and cooing will continue all throughout Tony’s youth. Talented child actor Barney Clark, last seen as Roman Polanski’s Oliver Twist, carries the role in the movie’s first third as the precocious and intelligent Tony, who is shaped by his over-sharing and lonely mother. She treats him as not just her baby but as a troubling combination of cherished pet, best friend, favorite accessory, and co-conspirator (Tony, already multilingual and at ease with wealth, is trotted out whenever possible to impress society friends). In one telling scene, filmed perversely as a genteel walk in the park, Barbara asks Tony if he’ll still love her when her tits are sagging. Yikes! Barbara sees little Tony as a proxy husband, too. Brooks isn’t exactly holding up his end of the marriage. Not that Barbara is either. Both spouses dally with other lovers, sometimes for kicks sometimes to hurt one another. Love is a battlefield in the Baekeland household.
When Tony comes of age, all that precocity and pampering curdles into surly entitlement, and the exceedingly well-cast Eddie Redmayne takes over the role. He’s entirely believable as Barbara’s son and not just for the matching freckles. A curious, fresh screen presence, Redmayne is what the French might call jolie-laide; that is, beautiful/ugly, depending on your point of view, or maybe the angle, or maybe his temperament at any given moment. That might generally describe Moore’s portrait of Barbara as well: exceedingly beautiful but full-on ugly, or at least diseased beneath her fetching surfaces. Barbara and Brooks became more hateful to one another as the movie progresses, and Tony lashes out, too. At one point the parents trot out a sexual offering of sorts, the young and beautiful Bianca (Elena Anaya), but their matchmaking backfires in all sorts of ways. Tony prefers the company of men.
Brooks, discomforted by the emotional extremities of both wife and son, runs toward familiar sexual crises (leaving his wife for a younger woman) while Tony and Barbara’s story speeds headlong into less familiar psychosexual thriller territory. The audience is left to wonder just how far Barbara and Tony will take their co-dependent relationship. (Since I’ve seen every last one of Moore’s movies, my guess was “far, very very far.”)
For all the Baekalands’ outrĂ© behavior, the movie is peculiarly timid at times. It’s got a dirty mouth and a perverse mind but not an especially brave physicality or challenging presentation. Tom Kalin, making his first feature film in 15 years, was far more inventive in his directorial debut, Swoon (1992), which was based on the Leopold and Loeb murders. The only thing that memorable film seems to share with this one is a vaguely queer spirit and the genre of the true crime story. Kalin seems content to sit back and watch Moore with the rest of us, wide-eyed. Moore’s performance is as full throttle as you might expect given the material and her past work. One scene in an airport threatens to rival her drugstore breakdown in Magnolia even if it doesn’t quite get there. Savage Grace is unfortunately tentative about underscoring Barbara’s distaste for her son’s homosexuality; a clearer message there would have helped explain, though not excuse, her actions in the story. And why, for instance, is the actress never naked? It’s not like she hasn’t paraded it around before, and often at that, on movie screens. In Savage Grace, when the material seems to demand utter abandon, she’s physically quite modest, even covering up in a simple bath sequence. The tentative handling of the sex scenes and of Tony’s own deeper emotional instability (a later obsession with a dog collar from his childhood seems to come from nowhere) also makes the grim and bloody finale feel oddly rushed, perhaps borrowed from another film.
Still and all, it’s great to see Moore back in the saddle of a challenging role. Who can blame Kalin for staring? Whether through bad choices or a scarcity of suitable roles, she’s been wasting her time in some truly dreadful motion pictures since her last great effort, 2002’s Far From Heaven. Pray that Savage Grace is a turning point in her career back to worthwhile material. While you’re on your knees, throw in a prayer for her future screen children as well. They’ll need all the grace the heavens can muster.
Nathaniel Rogers is a freelance writer in New York City. He is older than Penelope Cruz and younger than Nicole Kidman but ought never to be confused with Tom Cruise. He blogs daily at The Film Experience.
Hound of the Pajibas | | Swingtown |
Comments
Jesus. This sounds... um... creepy. Very much so.
That opening paragraph was great, by the way.
Posted by: TK at June 5, 2008 12:40 PM
Well-written review aside (I've noticed her worst film parent ever credentials as well), REPLACE THAT YBNBY AD! I cannot bear to look at it any longer and it's starting to haunt me in my dreams.
Posted by: gravyboat at June 5, 2008 12:42 PM
Thank you for this scintillating review - sounds like just my cup of tea.
Posted by: Cindy at June 5, 2008 1:01 PM
"she's been wasting her time in some truly dreadful motion pictures since her last great effort, 2002's Far From Heaven."
I assume you mean that was the last film where she gave a great performance, not the quality of the films themselves, since Children of Men came out in 2006 and was fucking fantastic.
Posted by: Sidewinder at June 5, 2008 1:29 PM
I just saw this over the weekend and I can truly say that naked or not, it has THE MOST uncomfortable sex scene I have ever seen (and I have seen some pretty weird sexual films). In fact, I thought it worked better that she was never naked, because it totally worked with her personality of outward genteelism and perfection while underneath there was a raging psychopath.
Posted by: PaddyDog at June 5, 2008 1:42 PM
Savage Grace is Gone in Sixty Seconds.
Had to get that out. Why do I think that way?
Posted by: duane at June 5, 2008 1:44 PM
Oh, and before I forget, great review.
Posted by: Sidewinder at June 5, 2008 1:46 PM
In the title picture above, is her shirt covered with blood?
She'll always be Maude Lebowski to me, but I think I'll be seeing this one.
"He's a good man, and thorough."
Posted by: mswas at June 5, 2008 1:55 PM
I hated "Far from Heaven."
Posted by: samantha t at June 5, 2008 2:07 PM
mswas:
No her dress is a 1970s floral number with large red and white blotches.
Posted by: PaddyDog at June 5, 2008 2:23 PM
Hmm...I just realised that my redhead friend (because I only have one) will look exactly like Moore when she's older. Lucky bitch. Oh yea, this is a pass for me because a) Films take forever to come out here and b) I hate depressing films...particularly in the summer. I want to be entertained dammit! On the other hand I'd have no problem readin the book on the beach. For some reasons I mostly watch films for entertainment and read books for...well...the same reason I eat I suppose.
Posted by: Joker at June 5, 2008 2:30 PM
While I generally like uncomfortable, awkward films--especially dealing with sexuality--I still can't get past being queasy about parent-child sexuality. Or adult-child sexual relationships. Birth, and Nicole Kidman, really fucked that one for me.
Sounds intriguing. I'll netflix.
Great review, Nathaniel.
Posted by: boo at June 5, 2008 2:54 PM
Chilren of Men was good. Moore in Chilrden of Men was Gawd-Flippin-Awful. I won't blame her, though- I think it was the writing. She seemed shoved into each scene she was in like a lower level employee gets shoved into a conference room full of bigwigs.
That said, as long as it wasn't Igby Goes Down, I guess I'll be okay.
Posted by: that bees chick at June 5, 2008 4:39 PM
Sorry guys, I have to admit I liked The Shipping News, if only because I was one of the ten people I've ever met that read the book, and it's always interesting to see Canadiana interpreted by the American film industry. Unfortunately, most Newfies I know would rather arm wrestle an Aboriginal woman in a bar in Northern Alberta and then flip tables over shouting "It's a bear!" when they lost said arm wrestle match, than participate in their local wimsey and folklore.
Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at June 5, 2008 8:01 PM
One scene in an airport threatens to rival her drugstore breakdown in Magnolia even if it doesn't quite get there.
Her performance in Magnolia and that scene in particular is probably the biggest reason why I can't stand Moore (Maude Lebowski being the one exception) and think that she's one of the more overrated actresses in Hollywood today. All too often she chooses histrionics over subtlety. Anyone can force tears and have a fit but a truly great actor knows that fighting the tears back, keeping them in and showing rage that is quiet and restrained can carry a lot more emotion and make a much more powerful statement than going hysterical and throwing a tantrum.
Posted by: causaubon at June 6, 2008 8:52 AM
Causabon re. your handle, I've been meaning to ask for some time:
Are you an Eliot fan or an Eco fan?
Inquiring minds want to know, old bean.
Posted by: Ranylt at June 6, 2008 9:15 AM
I wanted to like this movie, but there is something missing from it - for all the terrible things that happen, it's somewhat empty. I agree with you that it's "timid" and "tentative." We spend a great deal of time with the bored and idle rich, but their motivations and thoughts remain a mystery.
I also thought Moore's scene in the airport, and some of her other more dramatic moments, verged on camp. Maybe because no one else in the film showed any emotion whatsoever, when she did, it was over the top.
Posted by: medusa at June 7, 2008 6:37 AM
Ranylt: a little from column a and a little from column b. although the inspiration did come from Foucault's (with an extra u) - it was my favourite book for a long time.
i went through a time in high school when i was really in to conspiracy theories, the knights templar, freemasons and other secret societies (oooh, the illuminati), the whole "holy grail is actually an euphemism for Magdalene's womb, the 'blood' of Christ was his seed, she ended up pregnant in the south of france and the french royal family is descended from Christ, but according to Da Vinci (and others) Jebus was actually an imposter and John the Baptist was the true son of Godtopus" theory, and, of course, Paul is actually dead and the Beatles were leaving clues to this in their album covers and songs.
life in southern ontario suburbs can get a little boring. hanging out at malls/strip plazas/tim horton's just didn't "do" it for me.
Posted by: causaubon at June 7, 2008 8:09 AM
Not for nothing, Causaubon, but Southern Ontario will do that to a person.
Way cool to have a Pajiba commentator named after historical and literary philologists (I think Eco himself linked all three figures in one early passage of FP). Totally appropriate for an Eloquent.
Posted by: Ranylt at June 7, 2008 1:39 PM
thanks, Ranylt, now i'm blushing.
of course, i did end up removing myself from SO by 7 time zones and a bunch of degrees north and am quite happy in my little corner of the world. not that i wasn't happy in and around the T-dot, i'm just happier now.
say 'hi' to Bi-town for me - i still have a bunch of friends living there.
Posted by: causaubon at June 7, 2008 2:06 PM


