
Talking Without Speaking, Hearing Without Listening
The Quiet / Daniel Carlson
The ads for The Quiet are all about Elisha Cuthbert, and Elisha Cuthbert is all about sex. Her career, her presence, her entire reason for being are all wrapped up in maintaining an erotic stranglehold on the fragile psyche of young American males: She first gained notoriety as a cheery floozy in Love Actually, then turned around and endeared herself to frats across the country with her underwear-themed turn in Old School. And who could forget her “work” on “24”? And then, oh goodness, the self-destructive wish-fulfillment that is The Girl Next Door. Even her role in the moronic House of Wax required her to do nothing but jiggle and run in a wife-beater while getting just the right amount of dirty. And herein lies the problem: She’s become so inherently sexualized that it’s impossible to take her seriously as anything other than a slutty caricature of real life. Even in the best of circumstances, Cuthbert would have to do a fantastic bit of acting to overcome the fact that even she doesn’t take herself seriously. And trust me when I tell you: The Quiet is far from the best of circumstances. Far. Pilgrimage to Mecca on foot far. Director Jamie Babbit’s film aspires to be a moody thriller dealing in dangerous subjects, but it’s really just a slice of blissfully unselfconscious tripe, the kind of tawdry tale that should be coming on Oxygen late at night and featuring Nancy McKeon or Mackenzie Phillips as the pill-popping mom. It has nothing going for it, and everything against it.
From the outset, the film aims for the eerie mood of a sophisticated thriller, but it’s hampered by everything from sets that hit the trifecta of ugliness, cheapness, and clumsy metaphor; to laughable dialogue, including some of the worst exposition you’ll ever hear; to story points that feel random and completely unconnected to any kind of overarching plot; to dreadful acting by a group of not-very-talented performers; to the gradual slide from drama into unintentional comedy.
The film begins with Dot (Camilla Belle) wandering the halls of her high school. She’s deaf and mute, though that doesn’t stop her from narrating the film. Recently orphaned, Dot now lives with the family of classmate Nina (Cuthbert), a cheerleader who hates Dot with the blind passion reserved for teens who hate other teens in movies. Dot bears silent witness to Nina’s tortured home life, which includes a mother (Edie Falco) who’s forever remodeling the house and cruising on prescription meds and a father (Martin Donovan) who has more than a passing interest in his daughter. This is the house’s big secret: the incestuous physical relationship between Nina and her dad. Nina confesses this to Dot, since Dot is deaf and she just needs to get it off her chest. Nina also admits that she sometimes enjoys the sex, and that she hates her father and plans to kill him.
That’s the running gag: Confess your sins and desires to the deaf girl. Nina’s concerns are legitimate, but it isn’t until Abdi Nazemian and Micah Schraft’s screenplay introduces soccer stud Connor (Shawn Ashmore) that things get really absurd. Connor takes a shine to Dot and takes her out for a milkshake — aww — and isn’t with her five minutes before he starts telling her he’s wondered what she looks like naked and how these thoughts have driven him to new realms of self-abuse. I felt bad at the few chuckles I couldn’t hold back, since nobody wants to be the jerk ruining the ambience in the theater, but I soon realized that the sparse crowd was laughing right along with me. It wasn’t that Ashmore delivers his heartfelt confession of flagellation with such gravitas, though that definitely helped; it was the insanity of the situation. It’s as if these horrible kids have been just waiting for a deaf student to show up so they can pour out their twisted hearts. What’s worse, Babbit shows no interest or ability in maintaining the tension that would (you’d think) necessarily arise from one character knowing or at least suspecting that everyone else was up to something, or from the audience knowing the same info. For a sexed-up thriller, The Quiet is shockingly dull, plodding along through a series of scenes that are tenuously connected at best. There’s no story here, just a group of poorly formed ideas. Perhaps the weirdest of these is a scene of Dot mourning her dead father by crying over his ashes before running her fingers through them and then — wait for it — licking her fingers. I don’t know what to say. I don’t even know what that’s supposed to mean.
Soon enough, Dot finds herself drawn into Nina’s downward spiral of emotional torment at the hands of her abusive father and absent-minded mother. Nina’s mom often passes out in the living room, which is still a wreck from the renovation process. It’s a clunky representation of the mental anguish hiding behind every door in suburbia, and the space exists in a constant murk of dust motes and dim light, even during the day. Nina’s father grows increasingly brave in his attempts to grab his daughter’s butt, so Nina concocts a plan to get some money and run away. But with a life like hers, it’s clear things won’t work out pleasantly.
The Quiet is a failure for many reasons, notably in that it managed to take an unsettling subject and make it boring. Instead of a web of secrets being slowly wrapped around the central characters, Dot and Nina exist in a world without consequences. The story has a twist, though one that the average viewer will figure out within the first few moments, and it’s only through a supreme act of will I’m not spilling the secret here. Throughout it all, Cuthbert pouts those pillowy lips and does what she can with the story, but it’s nowhere near enough. She’s supposed to be the victim, but her onscreen persona is so sexualized that there’s no shock value in the story: Yes, Nina’s tale is a dark one, but Cuthbert was bound to get here eventually. It was only a matter of time.
Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.
Comments
Sounds like someone skimmed The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter and thought "Hey, if we made this story really sleazy, it might be good!"
Posted by: Tim at August 29, 2006 10:57 AM
There seems to have been a burgeoning trend in film lately, at least since the late '90's, where storytellers seem determined to trot out the most hideous of human frailties, showcasing them in an attempt to hold up a mirror in front of those of us who have not fallen so far. However, the stories are [more often than not] executed poorly, and these films end up being a barrage of images that are intended to frighten or discomfort but are instead simply distasteful and boring. In recent memory, there have only been a couple of movies that have succeeded. Monster comes to mind, saved largely by Charlize Theron's Wournos, vibrating with rage and shuddering with fear at the same time. Theron's characterization is sharply contrasted with Carlson's description of Cuthbert's over-sexualized nymph. There was nothing glamorous or sexy about her life and choices, the eroticism of any sexual relationship or attraction destroyed by the selfish motives of everyone involved.
It seems as though character driven films on subjects that are hard to watch, like Boogie Nights, succeed both because of the actors nuanced performances and the director's ability to carve a story out of what is basically a two hour montage of self-destructive behavior. Do movies like The Quiet fail because of the acting and directing? Or is it because they are simply attempts to thrill the senses with behavior that, unless suffering from some disorder, only disturb and disgust?
Posted by: Kitty X at August 29, 2006 11:06 AM
Am I really the only one who thinks Elisha Cuthbert looks like Porky Pig?
Posted by: Tracy at August 29, 2006 11:55 AM
"Am I really the only one who thinks Elisha Cuthbert looks like Porky Pig?"
Nope, Tracy. I'll jump on that boat. And, like Porky, she tends to leave the pants elsewhere, apparently.
Posted by: em at August 29, 2006 12:07 PM
Wait, lemme guess - Dot isn't actually deaf? If that's the twist, I swear to God I'm going to start burning down movie studios and paintballing execs as they come screaming out of there. Elisha Cuthbert indeed painted herself into this bimbo corner, and while this film may have sounded great in the pitch meeting (don't they all?), it's probably not going to be her salvation.
And I actually enjoyed The Girl Next Door.
Posted by: TK at August 29, 2006 1:29 PM
For all Cuthbert's sleaziness, she still professes that she won't shoot a nude scene at this point in her life. What, exactly, is she waiting for?
Posted by: Eric at August 29, 2006 1:56 PM
She can probably read lips.
Posted by: Tax at August 29, 2006 2:00 PM
Ooooo... I think I've got a handle on the finger lickin' father mourning scene. Okay, so she's a deaf mute, right? And she doesn't realize that these are her father's cremains... she thinks that Porky maliciously over-microwaved her caramel corn. 'Cause that's what mean high school girls do. So she's sad.... real
sad... and then wistfully licks her fingers to see if theres a small
vestige of caramel flavor left.
Cremains. I love that word.
Posted by: BitterB at August 29, 2006 3:28 PM
Oh go on Daniel, spill the secret!
I don't intend to ever watch this steaming pile, so you wont be spoiling it! :D
Posted by: Loob at August 29, 2006 4:01 PM
Every door in Suburbia? And that 'faceless middle class' remark in the Little Miss Sunshine movie? What's the problem you people have with Suburbia anyway? These movies that take cheap shots at the middle class are getting Goddamned rediculous. Excuse us for not living in New York or L.A like 'real' Americans.
Posted by: Matt at August 29, 2006 4:04 PM
Tell me this movie doesn't steal it's twist from the legendary 1997 Matthew Modine TV movie blockbuster "What the Deaf Man Heard."
Please,please tell me.
Although, thinking about it, a sexed up Elisha Cuthbert is a definite upgrade over a smarmy self-righteous Modine.
Posted by: Monty at August 29, 2006 4:17 PM
Daniel, re: title of review
Is that a deliberate ref to a Dead Can Dance lyric, or just an interesting coincidence?
(Probably, in fact, the kind of inevitable coincidence that only takes about 400 monkeys in a room of 400 typewriters rather than true infinites.)
Posted by: ranylt at August 29, 2006 8:18 PM
I have no idea what Dead Can Dance is, or if they really can dance. It's from "The Sound of Silence." What can I say, sometimes I go old school.
Posted by: Daniel at August 29, 2006 8:26 PM
My guess: Dot is actually Nina's other personality. If that's true then it totally ripped off of a novel I read as a kid called Uncle Vampire about a girl and her twin sister Honey who are trying to convince everyone their uncle is one of the blood sucking undead--which of course he isn't, he's molesting her. And Honey isn't real, she's the protagonist's alter ego. Anyway, just a guess.
Posted by: Sally at August 29, 2006 8:34 PM
Matt, the problem is surburbia and its discontents are better explored in so many other films, for example, Ang Lee's The Ice Storm and, I hate to mention it, American Beauty. These types of movies (like the one above) make it seem all sexy and tawdry and rife with perversity, but in fact, it's nothing really against surburbia per se. It just feels like a pretty wretched place to live in if you don't have the perfect family or albeit, a normal one. I've lived in surburbia most of my life and hated it, so I can understand some people's distaste for it. It's just plain boring and mechanical...not that city life is much better. But it's not something I'm looking forward to as I get older at all.
Posted by: Gina at August 29, 2006 8:52 PM
What in the hell is Suburbia and it's discontents anyway? Hollywood loves to pump out these films and they think they are so revealing of "America's Dark Underbelly" or somesuch nonsense. Don't get me wrong, I like American Beauty, and the Ice Storm, but those movies, and I am sure this one too, always have an air of superiority to them that I find annoying.
They remind me of Will & Grace (stay with me). When that show first started I thought it was funny, but by the third or fourth episode I realized that the butt of most of the jokes were ordinary everyday people whose main crime was a lack of designer clothing. I got really tired of laughing at them laughing at me.
Posted by: John at August 30, 2006 2:16 AM
I hope a Pajiba writer does a review on Zen Noir, even if it is under 90 minutes.
Posted by: Justin at August 30, 2006 5:25 AM
Navel gazing at Suburbs - I think the American dream is based on a lie - that suburbs are as interesting as cities.
This "Dark underbelly" does not reside in suburbs. It resides in the seats of administrative power that decide to shut down the cores of cities, abandoning millions to the crack-den ruins of Rome. Ray Nagin merely presides over the newest part of the ruin, joining the web of half-dead cities that PR can't spin back to life.
Suburbs are just the lifeboats for sinking cities.
And Elisha Cuthbert is not sexy enough to distract us from this for long.
Posted by: Damien at August 30, 2006 5:48 AM
"Or is it because they are simply attempts to thrill the senses with behavior that, unless suffering from some disorder, only disturb and disgust?"
Great observation about this genre of films. I suspect that it's easier to do this than to write about good, everyday people just trying to get by who experience moments of grace compelling enough to get you to watch them. It's cheap and easy to rivet an audience with odious behavior - it's a lot more difficult to actually construct a multi-layered character. I have so much more respect for movies like The Straight Story (and Lynch has done both types of movies very well), Ulee's Gold, You Can Count on Me, etc. where the protagonists are just regular people who face an everyday conundrum. It's like reading Wallace Stegner: it's tough to make "boring" people fascinating, but really skilled artists can do it.
That said, this movie sounds like shit on a stick.
Posted by: Samantha T at August 30, 2006 9:30 AM
"Or is it because they are simply attempts to thrill the senses with behavior that, unless suffering from some disorder, only disturb and disgust?"
Great observation about this genre of films. I suspect that it's easier to do this than to write about good, everyday people just trying to get by who experience moments of grace compelling enough to get you to watch them. It's cheap and easy to rivet an audience with odious behavior - it's a lot more difficult to actually construct a multi-layered character. I have so much more respect for movies like The Straight Story (and Lynch has done both types of movies very well), Ulee's Gold, You Can Count on Me, etc. where the protagonists are just regular people who face an everyday conundrum. It's like reading Wallace Stegner: it's tough to make "boring" people fascinating, but really skilled artists can do it.
That said, this movie sounds like shit on a stick.
Posted by: Samantha T at August 30, 2006 9:30 AM
tri‧fect‧a /ˈtraɪˌfɛktə/
–noun
1. a type of bet, esp. on horse races, in which the bettor must select the first three finishers in exact order.
2. a race in which such bets are made. Compare superfecta.
tri‧ad /ˈtraɪæd, -əd/–noun
1. a group of three, esp. of three closely related persons or things.
tri‧o /ˈtrioʊ/ –noun, plural tri‧os.
3. any group of three persons or things.
tri‧um‧vi‧rate /traɪˈʌmvərɪt, -vəˌreɪt/
–noun
5. any group or set of three.
This is a pretty pedantic comment, but nobody seems to want to use the word 'trifecta' properly.
Posted by: Emily at August 30, 2006 11:49 AM
I confess I'll probably Netflix this movie and watch it when my husband is away, ONLY because I have a father/daughter incest fetish that rivals Edith Wharton's. I like the fact that she confesses to "liking the sex" sometimes.... Somehow I don't think I'll be the only one who sees this for that reason only.
Posted by: Vivian Girl at August 30, 2006 12:02 PM
Ok, so she's deaf but I'm assuming these folks believe she can't write.
Posted by: Candy at August 30, 2006 3:25 PM
"I confess I'll probably Netflix this movie and watch it when my husband is away, ONLY because I have a father/daughter incest fetish that rivals Edith Wharton's. I like the fact that she confesses to "liking the sex" sometimes."
Vivian Girl - I don't know if that's creepy or courageous or both to admit that. Wow.
Posted by: Samantha T at August 30, 2006 5:02 PM
Damien, as an Urban Planning student, I would just like to say your explanation of the relationship between suburbs and cities is one of the best I've ever heard. Its a damn shame you're right though...And Gina, you're right about other movies explaining the suburb deal better. I just think Hollywood uses the topic as a convenient whipping boy when they can't conjure up a better satire.
Posted by: Matt at August 30, 2006 5:46 PM
"I confess I'll probably Netflix this movie and watch it when my husband is away, ONLY because I have a father/daughter incest fetish that rivals Edith Wharton's."
Me three!
Posted by: KitKAT at August 31, 2006 1:35 PM
I'll save you guys some time and money and let you in on the twist:
She's not actually deaf. She is, however, blind.
Dun, dun, dunnnnnnnn.
Didn't see that one coming, didya?
Posted by: Ryan at August 31, 2006 8:34 PM
Ryan, you're my hero.
But, ermm, blind?? How did that slip past everyone? What, really thick contact lenses? Just... Wow.
Posted by: Gina M. at September 1, 2006 11:40 PM
I think I'm one of the few people who doesn't think Elisha Cuthbert is all about sex. Mostly it's because I've never really bothered to watch anything she's been in lately, but also because I still associate her with Popular Mechanics For Kids.
Posted by: Cynthia at September 10, 2006 2:42 PM

