web
counter
 

"His Madness Keeps Him Sane"

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Pajiba Storytellers | Comments (21)



Norton.jpg

Storytellers is an ongoing attempt to tease out bits of history or literature that would make damned good films. Because if we throw enough ideas out there, Hollywood might accidentally make something good.


“At the pre-emptory request of a large majority of the citizens of these United States, I, Joshua Norton, formerly of Algoa Bay, Cape of Good Hope, and now for the past nine years and ten months of San Francisco, California, declare and proclaim myself Emperor of these United States.” -Joshua Norton

After a decade of business missteps left him destitute, on September 17, 1859, San Francisco resident Joshua Norton issued a proclamation in San Francisco newspapers (who printed it as a joke) that he was declaring himself the emperor of the United States, ordering the armed forces to immediately dissolve Congress, and for the representatives of the various states to meet at the San Francisco music hall for him to work out arrangements of government. Not surprisingly, the military did not comply, and representatives did not appear at the designated meeting. What might have been an amusing footnote in a busy news week turned into a novelty that lasted over a two decades as the city accepted him and he began issuing regular proclamations, printing his own currency and bank bonds, selling them to tourists. Various local establishments accepted his currency as legal tender.

It’s two stories nestled as one. A madman, buried in his own delusions, taking a stand on what he thought was right and just. In his madness, he was everything a sovereign should be: kind, patient, gentle, fired with righteous anger. He was an idiot savant of charity, living solely on the generosity of others. They say that only men who want no power at all are fit to hold it, that the only way to earn power is to be entrusted with it and then use it wisely, ex post facto privilege. Norton was that peculiar sort of sovereign, the ruler in exile, all proclamations and bluster without an ounce of tangible power. But he strove to earn the power he insisted was his denied right. His highness wandered the city and performed inspections, intervening on occasion when ethnic riots threatened to erupt in the Chinese quarter. The beautiful metaphor of the story is that Norton took on the mantle of everything a democratic citizen should be in his masquerade as emperor. A government of the people, the people as assembled emperors.

It is also the story of a city though, a people invested with a certain kindness that is all too rare throughout history. Nine times out of ten, this story ends with Norton dying anonymously in a gutter, teeth kicked in or lungs giving out under a final fatal bout of pneumonia. Cultures around the world have revered the icon of the mad prophet, blessing Loki’s many guises with the right to speak truth to power. Norton was embraced by a city, honored. The police saluted him as he passed on the street. The finest restaurants welcomed him every day, charging his royal highness not a dime for the meals, but proudly hanging plaques attesting to his patronage. Theaters and shows would hold seats for the emperor on opening nights.

But they were not laughing at him, no. He was not playing the fool and they were not winking as they played an audience. Norton did not exploit the generosity of the city, dying with nothing to his name but trinkets, spare change and forged letters from kings and queens. 30,000 people streamed to his funeral, over a tenth of the city in an age before electricity birthed celebrities.

The danger in making the film is that it would either be turned into a grift or a vehicle for feeling sorry for the nut job. To get at the heart of this story would require a deft screenplay that avoided the screenwriter’s 101 short cuts of setting up a pretty young lady (alluded to be his long lost daughter) who exists solely to worry about Norton, or a corrupt city commissioner (alluded to as the one responsible for Norton’s original destitution and thus madness) to play obvious antagonist. This is not the story of a man so much as it is the story of a collective fever dream of something grand and impossible. The key insight is that Norton himself is a fundamentally static character, who after the initial snap, evolves very little over the course of the story. The evolution all occurs in the attitude of the city. There is a curious minor figure in the tale, a young police officer who once arrested Norton in order to force him to get treatment for his mental disorder, who would serve as an ideal narrator. Tell the story from his point of view, moving from scoffing, to caring, to ultimate acceptance of a dream.

Casting our young officer would be straightforward. There is no preconceived notion of his build or appearance, so it would be an acceptably meaty role for any number of young actors coming out of the indie circuit. Norton would be an interesting role to cast because the pathos of the character hinges on the fact that he is everything that a sprung from nowhere emperor should not be. Somewhere around 40-60, homely, pudgy. The leading men with charm oozing out of their pecs need shewed away from this role. Paul Giamatti might be an interesting choice, and as a nice dark horse Stephen Toblowski would fit. Jeff Bridges might be the most perfect fit, bringing a bit of the Dude and a bit of Bad Blake. Bill Murray would be an interesting choice too, so long as he checked the goof at the door and channeled the sad clown. Of course, it’s exactly the sort of biopic that would catch the eye of somebody like Travolta going Oscar trolling, or horror of horrors, Robin Williams.

“Everybody understands Mickey Mouse. Few understand Hermann Hesse. Only a handful understood Albert Einstein. And nobody understood Emperor Norton.” -Principia Discordia


Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 03/24/10 | Team Edward vs. Team Jacob -- An Intellectual and Spirited Debate









Comments

This is not the story of a man so much as it is the story of a collective fever dream of something grand and impossible.

I'm sold based on that sentence alone.

Might I suggest another dark horse for casting, one of my personal favorite oddballs: Tim Blake Nelson.

Posted by: TK at March 24, 2010 2:21 PM

I first heard of Norton's tale via Gaiman's Sandman. I always liked that the citizens of San Francisco embraced him in a way that was theirs -- an almost-reverance for a modern-day Don Quixote -- without an ounce of sarcasm for the man.

The problem with the role is that it is just easy to overplay and turn into a buffoon -- shades of Richard Dreyfuss' Presidente in Moon Over Parador. The fact that whoever plays Norton cannot be playing him as a joke should not be lost on the director or the actor playing him.

Posted by: Fredo at March 24, 2010 2:23 PM

Where do you find these little tidbits, SLW?

This would make a lovely little film but, as I was reading, I immediately thought of Robin Williams being cast as well. Old Dogs Williams, not Father of the Year Williams. I'd like to see it as a smaller independent feature as, if big guns are involved, they'll turn it into some kind of conspiracy flick. One in which Norton is arrested by Homeland Security and Agent Smith has to find the Secret Mcguffin exposing something or other.

Posted by: admin at March 24, 2010 2:23 PM

I love this feature!!

And that was a good one. I'm going to have to Wiki him later.

Posted by: livience at March 24, 2010 2:25 PM

Fisher King Robin Williams would have killed this.

Posted by: D-Day at March 24, 2010 2:26 PM

Killed in a good way, I mean.

Love the Tim Blake Nelson call, Brian Cox could probably do this too. You need a touch of regal with the insanity it would seem. But the best casting choice of all?

Rip Torn.

Rip Torn acts like this every friggin' day. HE BUSTED INTO A BANK WITH A LOADED WEAPON BECAUSE HE WAS SO DRUNK HE THOUGHT IT WAS HIS HOUSE.

Cast him.

Posted by: D-Day at March 24, 2010 2:28 PM

I love this entire article. And maybe it is the picture, but I can't help but think Sam Rockwell (plus some pudge) would be amazing as Norton. Just me?

Posted by: Lurkey Turkey at March 24, 2010 2:28 PM

"You were with me when they arrested me for lunacy, and when they released me. Do you remember what the judge told the young patrolman?"
"Mr. Norton has shed no blood, robbed no one, and despoiled no country, which is more than can be said for most fellows in the king line."

Posted by: shymarona at March 24, 2010 2:32 PM

The story of His Imperial Majesty Joshua Norton the First, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico, deserves to be told. Toblowsky would be fantastic as the man who tried to corner the rice market and lost it all.

The secondary stories on how all confectioners were "by Appointment to His Imperial Majesty" (making him very popular with all the children when it came time to assess their appointments), and how Mark Twain resided in San Francisco and modeled the character of "The King" in Huckleberry Finn on Norton, could be thrown in as asides.

Posted by: Adam C at March 24, 2010 2:43 PM

I've read about him before, and hadn't really thought of it as a movie, but it COULD be beautiful.

Like the Tim Blake Nelson suggestion.

Posted by: dammitjanet at March 24, 2010 2:48 PM

admin and D-Day beat me to it. I immediately thought of Robin Williams re: "The Fisher King."

You know, it seems to me like many cities and towns used to have colorful characters like this. When I was going to college in Pittsburgh lo these many moons ago, there was a guy named Lansbury who was convinced the government was conspiring to keep him from getting important packages or letters in the mail. He'd roam downtown wearing a sandwichboard headed "Why can't Lansbury get mail?" with this whole screed in tiny handwriting on the front and back. I saw him once and tried to read it all but he was moving way too fast.

Anyway, the whole city it seemed like knew Lansbury and AFAIK if it didn't outright respect his delusions at least left him to them. IIRC there was a bar up the street where he'd preach his case and people would buy him beers.

Even the small college town I live in now had a few, most prominently probably Henry, aka "Yup-Yup," who became kind of our version of Radio, adopted as an unofficial mascot by the sports teams he loved.

It's probably a tribute to modern pharmaceuticals, but possibly to our detriment as a culture, that there just don't seem to be as many guys like this as there used to be.

Posted by: , at March 24, 2010 2:56 PM

Perhaps I'm on the wrong website, but this feels to me like one of stories where perhaps the narrative of history shouldn't be touched... or at least that film is not the medium in which to tell this story.

Film makes choices for us. It defines the edges of his world. The dust in the corner of his apartment isn't just dust, it's a product of someone's choice during production. The tics and mannerisms that fill out our perception of the character come from an actor who will be chosen for marketability.

There is no way to film a story that does not add definition to the tale, the characters, the world around them. That isn't inherently a bad thing. If it were, I wouldn't be lurking about on film websites. Directors, production artists, actors, and so on frequently bring insights to the table I would never have had, enriching the tale.

But it might be a bad thing in this case.

When you read his story, I think how you fill in the details of his world matters more than usual. I think this is a story that requires those edges to be vague. And the risk of standardizing those details for a generation of moviegoers may not be worth it.

Or, in short... go read a book.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at March 24, 2010 3:15 PM

Norton's a bit like King Lear, don't you think?

Posted by: cleverpeach at March 24, 2010 3:51 PM

Casting: Christoper Walken, Peter O'Toole.

Posted by: Mickey at March 24, 2010 4:11 PM

Google "Lieutenant Nun" for another wacky story that deserves a film. Cross-dressing nun travels to the New World in the 16th century, has crazy adventures, kills her own brother in a duel (unbeknownst to them both), is pardoned by the King of Spain, returns to the New World and disappears. There's so much more, too, I just forget it.

Posted by: Brenton at March 24, 2010 6:20 PM

Somebody get Nancy Oliver on this.

Posted by: M at March 24, 2010 7:05 PM

Tom Wilknson perhaps?

Posted by: Pete at March 24, 2010 7:50 PM

Kevin Kline. Even his Bottom in Midsummer had gravitas, and that character literally turns into an ass. He would be transcendent.

Posted by: Tammy at March 24, 2010 10:12 PM

Okay, when are you going to start making these movies?! Get on it, already! ;) I would love to see some of these damn quality stories on the big screen!!!!!

Posted by: AgoGo at March 25, 2010 1:02 AM

This could be really great. First heard about him a few months ago when some San Fran AFOL (adult fan of Lego) made a small diorama around him. Most cities of any size have people like this still, though on a less grand scale. Off the top of my head I remember the cross-dressing scene-stealer from 'Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil.'

I don't think Giamatti is right, nor Jeff Bridges. Guy Pierce could do this I think.

Posted by: EJ at March 25, 2010 5:06 AM

Jeff Daniels? Picture him close to his portrayal of Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain. He has an air of dignity that isn't stuffy.

Posted by: WAS at March 25, 2010 3:35 PM