web
counter
 

Child of the Devil

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Pajiba Storytellers | Comments (37)



yakov-stalin-son.jpg

This little article is a bit of an experiment. You see, at any given moment there are several billion bad movies being made. Our own trade news pieces often read like a series of obituaries to good storytelling. Hell, a good percentage of our hyperbolic rhetoric actually gets picked up six months down the line by a studio with a vested interest in intellectual apocalypse. Remember when Dustin got a Universal Soldier sequel made? Well, we’re drawing the line here. We’re going to pluck out the good ideas every once and a while on the principle that if shit keeps sticking to the wall, maybe ice cream will too. We’ll tease out some bit of history or literature that would make a damned good movie if it hit the right peoples’ ears, explain what makes the story so compelling, how it could be adapted for film or television and what the dream cast would be. Of course, if the article doesn’t get enough comments, Dustin said he’d make me live blog “American Idol,” and nobody wants that.

Yakov Dzhugashvili was born in 1907 with a congenital shortage of vowels in Georgia (the country, not the state), which was at the time a fairly backwater part of the Russian Empire. His life went rapidly down hill from that heady starting point. His mother died before his first birthday, and his father told associates that “with her died any human feeling in him.” Which is a fairly significant turning point in retrospect when that father goes on to change his name to “Stalin” and play at revolution. Stalin left Georgia and had little to do with Yakov’s childhood, leaving the boy with his dead wife’s family. Prison, exile, revolution, war, Stalin lived it up while his boy grew up without even learning to speak Russian until adulthood. Urged on by his uncle, Yakov heads to Moscow for university and the nightmare of his adulthood begins.

Stalin loathes him, the reminder of a long dead wife. Yakov drowns himself in alcohol, and when his fiancĂ©e is brutally dismissed, he shoots himself in the head but survives. Stalin is in the next room and scoffs “he can’t even shoot straight.” Yakov eventually marries a famous ballerina and fathers two children, but his mother’s family is summarily arrested upon his father’s orders. Show trials and grand proclamations of conspiracy. Yakov’s aunts and uncles, the ones who raised him as their own child, the family-in-law of the great tyrant himself, are locked away and then executed during the second World War.

Yakov joins the army during the war, avoids most special treatment and serves as an artillery officer, but is captured during the great German drive into Russia. Stalin disowns him and arrests his wife. All prisoners are traitors in the Soviet doctrine, and those few who survive the German concentration camps are escorted directly into the Gulag at war’s end. The Germans use Yakov for propaganda, spreading the word that he switched sides in crude leaflets, dressing him up like a Nazi doll in SS uniforms for photo shoots.

Hitler tries to arrange a prisoner exchange: Yakov for the German Field Marshall captured at the Battle of Stalingrad, but Stalin refuses. “I will not trade a Marshal for a Lieutenant.” There are rumors for years after the war that Stalin did attempt two times to send rescue missions, but Yakov is dead before the advancing Russians reach the camp. His death has been shrouded for decades. The Germans claimed he was shot while trying to escape. Others claimed that he committed suicide, throwing himself onto an electric fence after British POWs taunted him mercilessly. Other sources claim that his only friends in the camp were Poles and that he committed suicide by guard in shame after newspapers broke the story of the Katyn massacre.

But however he died, it’s a downright Shakespearean life, one of misery and nihilistic sadism, of the struggle to live any kind of life when one’s father is not only a monster, but the monster, the closet thing to a god king the modern world has ever experienced. One gets the impression that the only time he was ever truly free in his life was the moment after he decided to run for the fence.

To tell this story in a film requires two great actors and a director with enough restraint to focus the camera in and not let it pan out and linger on the great events of the time. Let the great events be reflected in their effects on the two main characters: Yakov and Stalin. Joseph Fiennes or Viggo Mortensen have the sort of dark and haunted presence to pull off a long life of desperation and heartache. And in a more nuanced sense, they both can act while not saying a word. Stalin? Anthony Hopkins could add another legendary antagonist to his resume here.

The studio would try to mess up the story in a few obvious ways. They’d focus on a love interest of some kind, letters back and forth, that sort of thing. They’d give Yakov a confidant and friend in the camp, probably a Brit or an American with whom we’re supposed to identify, probably with some badly written comedic lines. They’d probably insist on softening and humanizing Stalin, playing up the bad childhood, dead wife, etc. and letting that hang as an excuse to make the audience more comfortable.

The key to telling the story correctly is to make it about that relationship between father and son. Walk the fine line between their horror at and hatred of each other, and the little touches of similarity that make them foils at the same time. Echo their relationship with glimpses of Yakov with his son and daughter. Begin the film with Yakov being captured by the Germans. End it with him breaking into a run towards the camp fence. Everything else is told in flashback, a slow marinating revelation.

Or you know, they could just make a movie about another fucking board game.

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









The Five Best and Worst Films with Question Marks in their Title | Dumbest Outfit You Ever Had to Wear













Comments

Fascinating. And heartbreaking. Thanks for the history lesson, SLW.

I can't help but think this has foreign film with English subtitles written all over it, but that defeats the purpose of this whole column then, I guess. I also feel like it should be in black and white.

Yeah, I'm not helping at all, am I? A black and white, foreign film would get no play here.

I agree that Mortensen would play haunted really well. I have a hard time picturing Hopkins as Stalin, however.

And Stalin really was a monster, wasn't he?

Posted by: tamatha at February 17, 2010 3:28 PM

I think it sounds like an interesting premise. I'd probably check out the movie. Plus, Joseph Fiennes...nice.

Posted by: Gemma at February 17, 2010 3:40 PM

Screw Viggo as Yakov, he'd make a great Stalin himself.

Posted by: Captain Splendid at February 17, 2010 3:47 PM

This sounds incredible. Albeit, I was a russian history major, so I love me some Stalin (in an intellectual sense)but still. What an incredibly story to tell.

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at February 17, 2010 3:48 PM

Filmed properly, this could be an absolutely haunting movie.

I would argue that Christian Bale could also play Yakov. The guy may be a total ass, but he throws himself into his roles wholeheartedly. Just allow him to speak in his native Welsh accent to avoid the Americanized mushmouth that was Batman.

As for Stalin, maybe this could be the role that redeems De Niro to his Taxi Driver-era talent.

Or go the authentic route, hire Russian/Georgian actors and subtitle the whole damn thing.

Posted by: Pea at February 17, 2010 3:53 PM

I have nothing helpful to contribute, just: holy shit, I want to see this movie! Damn the industry.

My vote is for Viggo because he did such a damn good job in Eastern Promises. But Fiennes is a really, really close second.

Wow, hell of a movie idea. Maybe you should quit your day job?! Lol.

Posted by: AgoGo at February 17, 2010 3:55 PM

GodDAMN. I would watch that movie and bawl my eyes out the whole time.

Posted by: katyv at February 17, 2010 3:59 PM

Viggo as Stalin, Ben Foster as Yakov. I would be all over this, Kleenex in tow.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at February 17, 2010 4:03 PM

I never even heard of Yakov. Then again, my knowledge of Stalin is pretty spotty--I can hardly bear to think about the man. Hitler at least was insane; Stalin was, as you said, the Monster.

Posted by: Jerce at February 17, 2010 4:05 PM

I would definitely see a movie like that. Unfortunately it'll never get made for exactly the reasons you stated. Oh, and because of money. But what an excellent concept. Both the movie and the idea for the articles.

Posted by: admin at February 17, 2010 4:07 PM

Russell. F'ing. Brand. As. Yakov.
And a prop gun with a shell accidentally left in the barrel.

Posted by: Jim Doggie at February 17, 2010 4:07 PM

I love this column idea!

And I love Stalin too. I'm a history nerd and I find him very compelling.

I can't see Hopkins as Stalin, but I don't have anyone else to offer instead, so I guess I'm no help.

I want this to be a real movie. Like, NOW.

Posted by: Gabs at February 17, 2010 4:12 PM

I think Stalin's era is ripe for great storytelling (see Tom Rob Smith's excellent books), and you spell out a riveting tale here, Steven.

Posted by: Sean at February 17, 2010 4:21 PM

Also, how many comments do you have to get to avoid live blogging American Idol?

Posted by: tamatha at February 17, 2010 4:28 PM

Seems like it'd make an interesting movie. And the fact that there have been several movies about the lives of famous dictators makes it seem like there'd be a market for it. Hell, there's a trailer for a movie up about Mussolini's mistress, so why not?

Posted by: Ruby at February 17, 2010 4:32 PM

Completely agree that this would make a great movie, and I completely agree with the casting choices.

Also, I love this concept -- so much more interesting to read than the trade news. Keep it up.

Posted by: VampireSlug at February 17, 2010 4:35 PM

Comment Comment Comment!

More historical awesomeness for the historians!

Posted by: mae at February 17, 2010 5:14 PM

Stalin would need some humanizing only because irredeemable monsters are boring. He's only scary if you see him as a man doing terrible things rather than a demon in the shape of a man. That said, it does sound like a fascinating, if not necessarily pleasant to watch, film.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at February 17, 2010 5:18 PM

I would rather watch a Tetris movie.

Make it happen, Hollywood!

Posted by: welldressed at February 17, 2010 5:22 PM

I vote for this as a regular Pajiba feature. We can call it The Pitch, or some parody therof. And should the owners make it open submission?

Posted by: idiosynchronic at February 17, 2010 5:22 PM

sounds great.

Posted by: farik at February 17, 2010 5:29 PM

Really, there aren't enough movies about how much of a dick Stalin was, not with that glory hog of evil Hitler soaking up the limelight. I endorse your idea, though I wouldn't mind a non-documentary movie about Stalin's entire dysfunctional family, such as his wife who shot herself, and his daughter Svetlana who actually survived her father's reign. That'd be a good movie.

Posted by: SJ at February 17, 2010 5:32 PM

While I agree that Ben Foster could do the role of Yakov Smirnove (or whatever) justice, I think we've overlooked the perfect Stalin.

Wait for it.

Waaaaiiiiit for iiiiit....

Peter Stormare. He's one of the most memorable and terrifying actors in the business. He was the nihilist in "The Big Lebowski" and Satan in "Constantine" (the best part of that whole movie). He has this sociopathic glare that would bring such vile life to Stalin. He has a demeanor that is reserved, while hinting at a furnace of rage firing underneath. And he's Russian -- I think. It doesn't matter; he kills the accent even if he's not.

As the love interest I would cast [insert disposable hollywood beauty]. She'd be perfect.

And cast as the P.O.w. friend? We'll keep the Hopkins, but instead make him a German General or something. And maybe he's not a friend. Maybe he's another type of villainous manipulator.

Posted by: superasente at February 17, 2010 5:44 PM

the closet thing to a god king the modern world has ever experienced.

Stalin was also gay?????

Posted by: Will at February 17, 2010 6:05 PM

Great idea for a column, but the notion of Hollywood trying to tackle European history fills me with dread beyond imagining, I just KNOW they will fuck it up. If a test audience full of morons thought the real ending to I Am Legend was too depressing, how do you think they will respond to a tale of a alcoholic with a sociopathic mass murdering fuckhead dad that ruined his life and killed his family, who directly or indirectly attempted suicide several times before eventually succeeding?

Will there be titties?

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at February 17, 2010 6:22 PM

I'm kind of up in the air on the idea of turning this into a movie.

On one hand it would likely get nominated for an Oscar. Provided the cast is right. By right I mean without "beautiful" people.

On the other hand this movie sounds like it would be so fucking depressing I would want to kill myself. With all the depressing shit already going on in this world do we really want to look back in time at someone who had a life in which he no doubt wished he'd managed to kill himself when he tried?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at February 17, 2010 6:23 PM

I heart this. Please continue this article series until hollywood learns it's lesson.

Posted by: Bistro at February 17, 2010 6:33 PM

This sounds ossom. Yes, please.

superasente, I like the idea of Stormare as Stalin. That could be pretty interesting.

Posted by: Jelinas at February 17, 2010 6:48 PM

This is a brilliant idea. Seriously, I would see this movie and tell all of my friends about it. What a fantastic new column series you've started.

Posted by: SCannakate at February 17, 2010 8:24 PM

I would like to see Christoph Waltz in this.

Posted by: mafalda at February 17, 2010 9:12 PM

Poor guy. :( Thanks for depressing the fuck out of me.

Posted by: faye at February 17, 2010 10:50 PM

For Yakov--a role that's nothing but pain and misery--nobody wears pathos better than Robert Carlyle. But god, he would have to lose the Scotch accent.

As for big daddy, I don't know if he's up to it, but every now and then you see signs that he's got the chops and just needs to find the right agar. Let's give it to Bruce McGill. If he could be persuaded to cut the overacting and play it subtle I could see it. Of course they'd have to CG him up to size.

Ladies and Gents, I'm sorry but the contest is over. Johnnyboy wins!!!!!

Posted by: Johnnyboy at February 17, 2010 11:06 PM

Christoph Walz as Stalin. Alexander Skarsgaard as his son.

Posted by: cinekat at February 18, 2010 9:28 AM

What a horrible, horrible idea. Hollywoodize a man's truly miserable life. Truly miserable. This ain't fiction, this ain't "Shakespeare," this person existed, Yakov had to suffer through these experiences. To think "What a crappy life this guy had. I think Viggo should play him" is outrageous. People on this very site whine about historical inaccuracies of other biopics, and here you are promoting yet another in a long, long line. This poor man will be turning in his grave if such a film is made. What a terrible idea.

Posted by: Hybrid at February 18, 2010 10:18 AM

Love the article and the idea for a series. Hybrid, you're completely missing the point.

A second vote for Deniro as Stalin. I want to see if the greatest actor of his generation can flex his muscles again...

Posted by: S.K. at February 18, 2010 11:17 AM

What a great concept. And what a great choice to start conversation. I describe myself as a history buff, but never even heard this story. It would be truly horrific. But that's how World War II was. I think James Caviezel or Peter Sarsgaard as Yakov. And Liam Neeson would be great for Stalin. He plays great (in stature)men better than any other actor. And finally I think Paul Greengrass would be a great choice for director. His ability to create tension through individuals (Bloody Sunday, United 93) on the screen would fit the idea of portraying the movie in the German prison with flashbacks.

Posted by: WAS at February 18, 2010 12:14 PM

Liev Schreiber should be in this.

Posted by: Bananapanda at February 18, 2010 6:17 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time