web
counter
 

On the Occasion of His Birthday, An Encore Republication of The Heartbreaking Life and Death of Alan Turing

By Steven Lloyd Wilson | Posted Under Pajiba Storytellers | Comments (33)



turing-room.jpg

Storytellers is an ongoing attempt to tease out bits of history or literature that would make damned good films. Because if we throw enough ideas out there, Hollywood might accidentally make something good.

“Science is a differential equation. Religion is a boundary condition.” -Alan Turing

Alan Turing was one of the most brilliant men ever spun out of the human genome, a mathematician by trade, a codebreaker during World War II, and in 1936 he published the intuitive leap that invented the information age. He adapted Kurt Gödel’s mathematics of logic into the theoretical application that became the basis for all computers. At the time, great machines were constructed by PhDs for various specific sundry tasks of computation. The bastard offspring of pipe organs and telegraphs, these steam punk hybrids filled rooms, chomped on punch card memory chips and ticker tape hard drives, chugging and grinding along like your grandma’s ancient sewing machine. There were adding machines, dividing machines, machines that calculated digits of pi. Before men programmed with keyboards, they programmed with welding arcs and valves.

What Turing proposed was both simple and spectacularly profound. Why have specialized machines, when one could have a general machine? If all math can be reduced to a common language of logic, then anything that can be written as an algorithm can be written in that common language. Rather than designing individual machines for every logical operation imaginable, man need only design a machine that can execute the basic logical grammar. Any imaginable thought that could be expressed in that language of logic, be it as simple as addition or as complex as interpreting the noise of the stars would be comprehensible to that machine. And the further nuance: if such a machine could be built, a machine that ran on a logical grammar, then it could be told how to translate the logical grammar of any other such machine. In that deceptively simple concept rests the foundation of every desktop computer, every chip controlling a car’s fuel injection, every video game console, every electronic cash register, every calculator. Just about everything in the modern world that uses electricity and isn’t a light bulb is a direct descendant of Alan Turing’s 1936 insight: there is only one machine. The generations of computer scientists he birthed simply call that a Turing machine. You’re reading this on one right now.

Turing was an atheist or agnostic, depending on one’s particular definition. He believed that the universe was materially understandable, but that the new field of quantum mechanics might hint that everything we are might live on after death, our every thought rippling outward on quantum wave fronts. But that insistence on scientific explanation informed a corollary of his notion of a universal machine: that the human brain was also one of these machines.

Having invented the information age, revolutionized cryptography by spending the war years breaking every code the Nazis could devise, and planted the seeds of artificial intelligence and computer science, Turing was awarded the Order of the British Empire. Of course, he committed the most heinous crime short of communism imaginable in postwar Britain. He was homosexual.

Not needing him to break any more codes, and not imagining at the time much use for those computing machines, the British government saw fit to convict him under the same statute that ruined Oscar Wilde’s life fifty years previously. Given the choice of imprisonment or chemical castration, Turing chose the latter. He dosed an apple with cyanide two years later, killing himself with Eve’s temptation and Newton’s inspiration. He was only 41 years old.

It’s a story ripe for the telling on two levels. Most people have no idea what computers really are, and what makes them more than just fancy machines. The little humming boxes underneath our desks are our first prototypes for building a replica of the human mind. But it’s also a profoundly philosophical leap, this idea that anything that can think can be translated into anything else that can think. All the disagreements, all the hatred, all the fanaticism, all that is just running on the software level. We’re all the same machine underneath, whatever country or culture we come from, hell, whatever planet we come from. Turing’s insight is to thinking what the discovery that stars were made of hydrogen and helium was to physics. What is out there is the same as what’s down here.

But the second layer is the simple fact that a discovery of such profound democratic egalitarianism was made by a man indirectly murdered by his society in the prime of his life for the crime of his very nature is as painful as irony can get. Every bit of repression is not just a crime that society commits against those repressed, but a crime against society itself, robbing itself of some portion of the genius it contains. Repression is slow societal suicide.

There have been a couple of documentaries that touched on Turing’s life, and a play that later spawned a BBC movie back in the nineties, but nothing on the big screen. Get a young actor who can play the skinny genius with sad eyes, someone like Joseph Gordon-Levitt or James McAvoy, willing to take a chance and hungry for roles that mean something. Make this Brokeback Mountain crossed with A Beautiful Mind.


“I am not very impressed with theological arguments whatever they may be used to support. Such arguments have often been found unsatisfactory in the past. In the time of Galileo it was argued that the texts, “And the sun stood still… and hasted not to go down about a whole day” (Joshua x. 13) and “He laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not move at any time” (Psalm cv. 5) were an adequate refutation of the Copernican theory. “ -Alan Turing

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Ten Once Celebrity Objects of Sexual Desire Who Have Fallen Out of Favor | New Captain America: The First Avenger Poster Proves They Had Bronzer Back in the 1940s









Comments

If only...

Posted by: Robb at June 9, 2010 2:29 PM

Turing's story is one of the great tragedies of our time. It makes me so sad and angry, and you're right, it would make a great film, if done correctly.

Posted by: Drake at June 9, 2010 2:33 PM

Man, that's one hell of a tale, and one hell of a life. Who in Hollywood has the balls to take this one and DO IT RIGHT?

Posted by: dammitjanet at June 9, 2010 2:39 PM

Man, that's one hell of a tale, and one hell of a life. Who in Hollywood has the balls to take this one and DO IT RIGHT?

Nobody. This has foreign or indie director written all over it.

I have a deep and abiding respect for Turing, having created the subject that was the bane of my academic career so far (theory of computation). once it finally started to click for me, I could see the simple elegance of his work, even if it was a fairly elementary examination of it.

I do like this idea of this "Storytellers" thing. I have a couple of good subjects for it popping in my head as I type this. I take it that by "bits of history or literature", that means fiction as well?

Posted by: Vermillion at June 9, 2010 2:52 PM

Yeah, Turing got colossally fucked, and not in a good way.

Posted by: Slash at June 9, 2010 2:56 PM

Wait a sec....gay skinny white genius actor (of a sort)? Don't we have one of those around here?

No? You sure? Damn. Oh well.

Posted by: Vermillion at June 9, 2010 3:04 PM

It's A Beautiful Mind with less crazy and more Nazis.

Posted by: Danny smooth at June 9, 2010 3:08 PM

Thanks for highlighting Turing like this. I really appreciated this story in particular and this idea in general as a new Pajiba feature.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at June 9, 2010 3:13 PM

Very nicely written. I would really like to see this movie. Can someone get on it?

Posted by: Michin70 at June 9, 2010 4:26 PM

There was actually a BBC drama about Turing broadcast last year around Christmastime. I haven't watched it yet, but it was well-received, apparently.

I have a deep affection for Turing, both as a pioneer of technology, and as a remarkable human being. His life was certainly fraught with tragedy - his first love died of tuberculosis, you know.

Where I live, we have a memorial to Turing in the park in the local gay district. It's a bronze statue of him sitting on one of the benches. In his hand sits an apple.

Posted by: petitmal at June 9, 2010 5:45 PM

His legacy is still carried on by the Turing Test which as far as I know, no machine has passed yet.

Posted by: EricD at June 9, 2010 6:12 PM

Know what piece of history would make an interesting movie? Germanic Tribes sacking of Rome told by the tribes' point of view.

Posted by: a-roda at June 9, 2010 6:56 PM

Steven, your article was such a dickety-damn pleasure to read that I couldn't wait to get off work so I could comment on it.

Having only a vague, "name-recognition" memory of this man through media I can't remember offhand, I was curious enough to click & 'skim' through it, for some reason thinking it was a book review.

My intial reaction upon reading your impressive verbiosity (that's a word, ain't it?), coupled with snore-inducing terms like "mathematics of logic" and "theoretical application," had me very close to clicking the 'Back' button as my skull seemed to actually be thickening from the verbal intimidation I was starting to experience.

I didn't initially feel very well as I continued that paragraph, having to read extra slowly and still fearful the whole thing would just go straight over my head; but by the end of the second paragraph you had my total attention.

The second "layer" you expressed near the end was almost poetry for me, written by an impressively gifted writer and communicator. That alone would make an invaluable addition/lesson to 'Basic Ethics 101'. Not since one of Ranylt's early (1st?) reviews have I been so pleasantly surprised of finding a writer I've been missing out on.

And if you've published a novel, why the hell aren't you hittin' the bricks to get a screenplay and film project financed?

Seriously, I really enjoyed reading this and hope to see more of your work.

Posted by: C Wrench at June 9, 2010 7:00 PM

The story of Turing always makes me inexplicably mad. Well, not totally inexplicable, what was done to him was disgusting.

But for some reason, when history (and even current events) are filled with examples of this kind of arseholery, something about Turing hits me harder.
We idolise Einstein, and he was such a cheating dog even Tiger Woods would look down on him. But a man who equalled him intellectually is virtually unknown. There's just no words offensive enough to convey how wrong that is.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at June 9, 2010 9:42 PM

He dosed an apple with cyanide two years later, killing himself with Eve’s temptation and Newton’s inspiration.

I love you for that sentence.

Posted by: Linda at June 10, 2010 9:21 AM

I almost didn't take the time to read this, but I'm glad I did. Excellent article, SLW. You're a very passionate and eloquent writer. What fascinates me about computers, and I think is an excellent metaphor for life, is that you have all these layers of abstraction - hardware, an operating system, software, a graphical user interface, web browser, etc. - and they're all working together to give you your computer experience, but when you get down to the bottom, everything that happens on a computer is just ones and zeros... and even beyond THAT it's all just electrical impulses - on off on off on off. I do think it's very much like scientific discoveries in physics.

Posted by: Corntree at June 14, 2010 9:25 AM

This was beautifully written. It made me think about Turing in a way I never had before.

The play/BBC film you mention is "Breaking the Code", by Hugh Whitemore. Derek Jacobi was brilliant as Turing. It appears that the play has never been released on DVD.

Posted by: bcarter3 at July 2, 2010 10:16 PM

Just the knowledge that homosexuality in the UK used to be a crime punishable by jail or chemical castration is enough to piss me off. That it caused the death of a genius of Turing's stature shouldn't be required to make this fact more heinous. It does, but it shouldn't. We should be as outraged that it's happened to any person. The truly sad thing is that there are people who still think that punishment would be just even today. We won't be past this until those people are the ones considered unacceptable in society.

Posted by: Protoguy at June 23, 2011 10:10 PM

Another great story, Steven. These are quickly becoming my favourite columns on Pajiba (sorry, Teek.)

Posted by: Uriah Creep at June 23, 2011 10:53 PM

My idea for a film on this dude:

He's urban, upwardly mobile, stil has family in the ghetto . So, they decide to throw a barbecue. All math goes to hell when his aunt, Medea, shows up.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 24, 2011 5:21 AM

There is wonderful play on this very subject, a one man show. Breaking the Code. The production I saw left me with tears pouring down my face. If they started with the play and didn't totally fuck it up with the usual Hollywood crap, I would pay to see it for sure. I dunno, though. Hard to get something like this made today, what with no superhero and hot girlfriends and all.

Posted by: Michele at June 24, 2011 8:01 AM

I love you for that sentence.

Seconding this.

Posted by: twig at June 24, 2011 9:10 AM

Yes. Make it so.

I also loved "Enigma" but I think I was the only person who saw it.

I learned to program computers in the 1970s when it was still mostly done on punchcards. My first job was converting a punch card system to a line editor. I didn't even have a full screen editor yet, and WYSIWYG was still several years away. But boy was I impressed to have my own CRT green screen. I really felt like hot shit.

Posted by: BWeaves at June 24, 2011 9:25 AM

Repression is slow societal suicide.

Amen. I missed this article the first time around. Thanks for reposting.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at June 24, 2011 9:39 AM

Very well written, as always, about a story that is NEEDS to be told.

It is a shame that Turing is not better known. If not for his insights, the world as we know it would not even exist.

He deserves to be recognized alongside the likes of Einstein and Newton. It is doubly tragic that not only is he mostly forgotten, but that he took his own life because of the prejudices that existed at that time (and which many people still sadly cling to).

Thank you for another wonderful post sir.

Posted by: CptCrckpot at June 24, 2011 9:43 AM

"The bastard offspring of pipe organs and telegraphs" puts me in mind of Robert Hope Jones, also an Englishman, also an inventor, and also eventually a suicide that some have suggested had more to do with his bad treatment at the hands of his successors in The Wurlitzer Company than his homosexuality.

Hope-Jones, although generations younger than Turing, had a reputation for genius tinkering and a gentleness that exhibited in his method of suicide: He inserted tubes into his nostrils and then taped his nose and mouth shut so that escapingn gas would not endanger others.

Posted by: Jerry Kenney at June 24, 2011 12:19 PM

We idolise Einstein, and he was such a cheating dog even Tiger Woods would look down on him.

To be fair, I believe Einstein told his wife to expect neither fidelity nor intimacy.

Posted by: pissant at June 24, 2011 6:22 PM

It could be a great movie, or a REALLY great episode of Doctor Who.

Posted by: gatesong at June 24, 2011 8:33 PM

One of the things I always found so interesting was that his suicide was oddly considerate. Suicide usually seems to me as a great "fuck you" to the family left behind. His apple left his mother the comforting lie that he just accidentally forgot to wash his hand after puttering with his chemistry set. To me, that speaks of deathless pain matched against a kindness of spirit.

Posted by: megaera at June 24, 2011 9:26 PM

Now we know why Skynet is so pissed at us.

Posted by: eman at June 24, 2011 11:04 PM

as always, thanks. is anyone at the other end of the intertubes reading this stuff so they can make this (and the others) into a film? someone needs to do this!

Posted by: splinter at June 25, 2011 7:21 PM

And we live forever in hope. I really can't see this being done respectfully in Hollywood, but I can hope.

If it IS done and done well I know I can look forward to being a sobbing wreck at the end. Injustice sucks.

Posted by: Four Eyes at June 25, 2011 7:48 PM

"If all math can be reduced to a common language of logic, then anything that can be written as an algorithm can be written in that common language."

Um... but that's what Godel's mathematical logic proved you COULDN'T do. One of logic's axioms is the tautology, A=A. Godel proved there's an infinity of mathematical systems in which A=-A is true. Just saying. Math can be reduced to math, not logic. Not the kind philosophers use, anyway.

Posted by: Pippa at June 26, 2011 11:56 AM