free counter with statistics Pajiba Love 11/05/09 | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

south-park1105.jpg
Not Funny 'Ha Ha' ...


Pajiba Love / Stacey Nosek

Pajiba Love | November 5, 2009 | Comments (48)


I haven’t seen last night’s “South Park” yet, however sight-unseen I have to agree with this eloquently put article that Trey and Matt may have missed the point on this one. And to be honest, I’m kind of disappointed in them. (Unreality)

You’ve probably heard by now that Nicholas Cage is broke and suing his financial adviser, but it’s actually because he buys things like dinosaur skulls and meteors. (Litelysalted)

Some guy who is probably like, Nicholas Cage rich (I mean, before he was broke anyway) built himself an actual bat-cave. (Cinematical)

Prisco’s gonna have a review of Gentlemen Broncos up later today, but according to his twitter it was not …. good. And apparently it was so not good that it’s been flat-out canceled as a movie. (Film Drunk)

This has got to be the dumbest lawsuit I ever heard of. Maybe if No Doubt didn’t want their likenesses used in a video game they should have sold-out their likenesses to a video game. Shut up, Gwen Stefani. (Celebitchy)

Russell Brand might be cleaning up his act so he’ll be a more versatile actor. I bet he can already taste those “meaty leading man-parts” in his mouth. (Agent Bedhead)

If you ever find yourself trapped in a bomb shelter during a zombie invasion, you could probably do worse than a Hormel “Chili ‘N Spuds” chili meal. (Impulsive Buy)

I’m already sick of the promos for DO I LOOK SCARED?, I mean, 2012, and it’s already being adapted into a television show. Yes, somehow a movie where the world basically ends is somehow being serialized. (Warming Glow)

Ohmygod you guys I am SO excited about Amanda Woodward coming back to “Melrose Place.” Yeah, yeah … I know I’m the only one watching it, so I’ll just shut up now. (DListed)

In other “Melrose Place” news (OK, I lied) Ashlee Simpson possibly got canned not just because she couldn’t act her way out of a paper bag but because everyone hated her. Well, obviously. (Celebslam)

Carrie Prejean — wait, who? — oh right, that bigoted Miss California chick, is supposedly being extorted with a sex tape. I call bullshit on the whole thing though because TMZ claims to have obtained a copy but chose not to show it out of good taste. (Yeeeah!)

Here’s a piece on the novelization of video games. Wait, they make novelizations of video games? That might be the nerdiest thing I’ve ever heard. (Second Pass)

Wow, it turns out stupid houseflies are good for something after all: Creating cute, amusing little cartoons using their dead corpses. (mental floss)

This clip probably won’t make much sense for non-“Always Sunny” viewers, but here are seven glorious minutes of Charlie intensity:

Pajiba Love brought to you by Stacey Nosek, who can be reached via email here.


Bachelor Party Review | Eloquent Eloquence 11/05/09



Comments

That Bat Cave is making me drool. Then in swoops that Hormel meal to make me vomit. It looks like the time I threw up a cheeseburger. Ew.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at November 5, 2009 1:20 PM

"TMZ claims to have obtained a copy but chose not to show it out of good taste."

WHAAAAAAT?! Out of "good taste"? TMfuckinZ? What, pray tell, does the diptarded debutante do debauchery-wise during dis display? I mean, TMZ won't show it? I'm gonna take this opportunity to kick open the flood gates... What exactly does the video contain?

Thoughts?

Posted by: Skitz at November 5, 2009 1:21 PM

While I think Matt Stone and Trey Parker made a valid point, I think that all in all it was just a matter of REALLY bad timing. Considering that it aired on the same day that Yes on 1 passed, I think it was more a matter of poking at a raw nerve. It's still just a little too soon to be saying that 'Fag' means something other than what most people assume, but I think as time goes on and those "God Hates Fags" assholes die off, I think the meaning of the word will inevitably shift.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at November 5, 2009 1:21 PM

Can't we just get back to the good ol' days, when "fag" was used only for gay bashing or cigarettes? Hate speech was so much simpler then.

Posted by: logar at November 5, 2009 1:22 PM

According to CNN Prejean was alone in the video. Isn't that a sin?

Posted by: anikitty at November 5, 2009 1:27 PM

There's Tater in that chili? That's just wrong. Chili belongs IN Tater. Yum.

But not that chili. I think the dog ate that first.

-- T.B. Banks

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at November 5, 2009 1:30 PM

We're missing the true story on the video game novelization list, people.

Someone actually read ten of them. Actually, he read at least 12 of them, since he mentions two others by the Megaman 2 novelist. That's a sacrifice I would never make. Ever.

The only thing that could change that would be a novelization of Luigi's Mansion and/or Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem. Or Katamari Damacy. But without one of those three, I don't intend to read a novelization of a video game.

Posted by: Robert at November 5, 2009 1:31 PM

I know someone who reads Hitman novelizations. "Sad loser" doesn't even begin to cover it.

I want to stamp a giant red sign on Ashlee Simpsons forehead that says "FAIL". So, she had the nose job, the baby, the failed show. What's she gonna try next to keep up her fame whoredom? She and Jessica gonna put out a sex tape? A divorce? I'm gonna start taking bets.

I'm also running bets on what the two youngest Kardashians (and oh I hate that I know there's two more) will try to get their 15 minutes. That whole family just seems to have taken the 15 Ways to Become a Fame Whore and distributed it amongst themselves. Let's see:

1) sex tape--check!
2) surprise pregnancy--check!
3) surprise wedding--check!
4) lesbian affair
5) rehab
6) DUI
7) fight in public
8) divorce from a famous person
9) racist statement
10) random arrest
11) murder of a famous person
12) date George Clooney
13) pose in Playboy

And I need two more.

Posted by: figgy at November 5, 2009 1:42 PM

Hm. I'm interested to see that South Park episode. (I haven't watched regularly in ages.) I tend to subscribe to the theory that words are just words, and they can't hurt you if you don't let them; however, I also recognize that sometimes it's not as simple as that, especially with words that do have a long history of negative connotations (and "fag" has been a derogatory term for AT LEAST 40 years-I grew up in the early 70s hearing it used that way- and I think that's long enough).

The term "retard" is also not used to disparage people who are actually developmentally disabled anymore (or at least, not in my sheltered little mind), but it once was, and it's still used as a negative term towards someone who does something stupid. Where does that fall in the land of "acceptable usage", then? I have never used "fag" for any reason, but I have often called people "retards" (particularly while driving). Clearly, somewhere in my mind, "fag" is unacceptable but "retard" is ok. Why? Its such an interesting topic, isn't it? Why certain words are ok and certain aren't.

Also, dead fly art is weird. I like it.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at November 5, 2009 1:47 PM

AVB,
I am totally with you on "retard," but I also use "fag" in ways that have nothing to do with sexual orientation. But I don't go around yelling these words in public or putting any hate behind them. They are amongst the scores of words I use to safely diffuse frustration, anger and aggression. But I'm a dumb white honky so what would I know.

Posted by: Kballs at November 5, 2009 1:55 PM

My nightmare scenario is a group of gay retarded people asking me what I thought of G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra.

Posted by: laredo at November 5, 2009 1:56 PM

I watched the SP ep and I dont think they missed the point, in fact they raised it them selves within the ep. How ever I think they raised a good point...it's like, in the UK, Fag means cigarette...or used to, almost completely, mean cigarette, like 'I'm goin for a fag, i'm dying for a fag, has anyone got a light for my fag'
As a kid hearing the word didn't make me blink. Then suddenly I was exposed to american TV and fag became a bad word. But i've got gay friends who use fag to describe certain personalities of gay people...like, Queens, Queers, Homos, Gays and Fags, fags never being negative, just being like, trend, chav, goth, nerd, geek etc.
I think the episode makes a good point for the gay community reclaiming the word as well, in the episode the gay characters are initially shocked at the kids using the word fag until the learn the kids dont mean gays, but rather unpleasant people who's sexuality is a moot point.
If the word fag just means jerk, then calling a gay person a fag just means they're a jerk, not a negatively conotated gay person.
It's like gay and ghey. My bf and I often use ghey, with that spelling, to mean something is bad or negative, for example 'aah i burst a tyre on the way home from work, ghey'
It has nothing to do with homosexuality whatsoever and isn't said with any negative intention towards the gay community, and infact the spelling is intentionally intended to make the word seperate from Gay as in Homosexual.
Personally I think SP raised a great point, words change meaning with each new generation, sometimes in less than that, sometimes over a few months or scant few years.Obviously its how you say and who you say it to and the intention behind it but I think it's a good idea to change the meaning of the word. Like the article said, the word Fag used to mean a bundle of sticks. Then it was a slur for gays. Now it means jerks. Doesn't that reasoning, that once it was a gay slur, now it means jerk, mean that bundles of sticks should be upset to be insulted? that cigarettes should? That the elderly should go HEY! Dont use that word!

I'd personally never use the word fag to insult a gay person, just like I'd never use the n*word to insult a black person, but I DO agree that the words meanings change and become...if not acceptable(though sometimes they do) in daily lexicon, then at least wildly felt to have a new meaning. It's probably a good thing, yeah the word is being re-classified to mean a douchebag, but it's a start.
It's worth, I think, googling the words 'Reclaiming Paki', it's an article about a london born pakistani clothing designer who called his line Paki, to reclaim the (quite british) insult against asian people 'Paki' (an umbrella term meaning anyone brown who isnt black!)
it's along the same lines of giving the word new meaning and context and taking the sting out of it.
Jesus, lecture done, sorry

Posted by: Nadine at November 5, 2009 1:58 PM

figgy - how about revelations of incest? Like Mackenzie Phillips? Also, didn't Kim already pose for Playboy? I'm kinda disgusted that I know that.

AvB - I don't use the word "retard" because my mother pretty much instilled a sense of shame in me whenever I'd use it as a kid. She's a Special Education teacher, and that word has always irked her. When I used it to insult someone, she would lecture me about its meaning and how it wasn't right to mock others... so now whenever I hear it used, I instinctively cringe. So it's interesting that to some people, it's acceptable to use now. I guess it has a lot to do with how you heard it used or how you used it yourself... that goes for other words too, like "fag."

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at November 5, 2009 1:59 PM

I've actually nearly trained myself out of it, MelBiv, since I started working for a non-profit that assists the developmentally disabled. As I said, I grew up in the 70s, and it was more "socially acceptable" then, I suppose, or at least used more widely. I seem to recall my mom telling me it was really not nice, and I really didn't use it at all when I was a kid; it's actually a more recent development. Weird. I don't even know how it happened!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at November 5, 2009 2:09 PM

Bullshit! I answered Skitz's question to the best of my ability and it won't post. Booo...

Posted by: PissBoy at November 5, 2009 2:16 PM

Hell, I'm old enough to remember when "gay" only meant happy, cheerful, carefree. Like from my childhood during "The Gay '90s."

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at November 5, 2009 2:27 PM

They may mention the Cage's spending habits in that article, but they still forgot the most common thing people mention about Nicholas Cage.

"He charges 20 for oral, 50 for half and half, anal costs extra."

-Wicker Man director, Neil LaBute

Posted by: George at November 5, 2009 2:46 PM

That Charlie compilation video loses credibility by not including the USA song, and at least one McPoyle run-in.

ROCK, FLAG, AND EAAAAGGGGLLLLLEEEE!!

Posted by: D-Day at November 5, 2009 2:46 PM

What exactly does the video contain?
Thoughts?
Posted by: Skitz at November 5, 2009 1:21 PM

Seeing as how this girl is from California, I imagine it to be pretty bland. And by bland I mean the following:
The video opens with Miss Prejean X'ed out of her skull, dancing to yet another remix of Sandstorm in the middle of some random UCLA dorm. Our camera man can be heard chuckling about how hot she would look if she were wearing less clothing or was soaking wet, or both. She turns to the camera, which is turned on 'Night-Vision', obviously, to reveal the creepy bright white reflection off of her pupils, making her look like a Zombie who hates gays. She walks towards the camera with a slight gait in her step (obviously she's lost one of her shoes at some point in the night) and proceeds to go for the cinematographer. There is some jumbling of the camera as it falls out of focus and frame, and cuts off.

The camera starts again in a stationary position, still in nigh vision, regaining focus just in time to see a frat boy ass (Shyeah bro!) scurry across the frame. As he makes his way towards the bed, Prejean is writhing on the bed, touching herself, mumbling something about how comfy his dorm room cot is and how the 12 count WalMart sheets feel like silk as they cheese-grate her ass. Tyler Mcsucksatcollege hops awkwardly onto the bed and immediately goes down. He spits and jams his tongue, using all the excitement and technique of an epilieptic playing a harmonica as he wobbles his head furiously from side to side. After 5 or 6 awkward minutes of cunillingus (Schyea bro! Fuckin chicks!) Mr. Fratboy pulls himself up and leans back-up against his cinderblock dorm room wall. Oh the romance. Now we get to the boring part of the video as she begins to give him head with the flare of a chicken pecking for grain in a farmer's front yard. But we can't see anything. We are treated to a slight peek of the top of her ass crack and her shoulders and back as she faces away from the camera. Occasionally we see the back of her head. Tyler, is totally NOT a film student. Due to the Extasy it seems he's having some trouble rising to the occasion and she begins to giggle and make fun of his junk. He doth defend his manhood ever more aggressivley, eventually flipping her over. Now he's in full on "I'm gonna choke this chick for laughing at my dick"-mode...so obviously he now has a raging hard-on since steroids have left him only THIS amount of bloodflow to get him hard. He mounts her with no style and no grace while she moans in a mixture of semi-pleasure and "not so fast...you cum too quick." After about 60 seconds of him pounding her like a snare drum, he jumps up to grab the camera.

Oddly...when the camera cuts back...there are more people. Tyler must have edited out his weak-ass performance. As the camera settles back into focus on the tri-pod we see Miss California as the center of a Lacrosse team train. The is cock everywhere. Dudes are unloading on her from both ends like an army that has flanked it's now defenseless enemy. She can barely keep up with all the cock around her. Guys are plowing her 2 at a time, balls deep. There dicks are slapping together, balls intermingling. But totally not in a gay way right (Schyeah Bro!!! Totally!) because they are railing on a chick. Besides...if it was gay...she totally wouldn't be into it. It would be icky. People climax awkwardly all over her with faces remenicent of Goofy having a mop handle jammed in his asshole. She's catching the shmegg to the best of her beauty pageant ability, rubbing it on her face like it was Nuetrogena.

Uh Oh! Looks like Tyler accidentally got some jizz on Chad's thigh. Chad attacks Tyler. As the camera begins to pan out, we are treated to 2 nakes Lacrosse players wrestling each other to the ground, screaming how much the other one is a fag as 4 other stark naked men bear-hug Chad and Tyler trying to separate them. But it's totally not gay because they were all just bangin' this chick. (Schyeah Bro! Totally not fucking gay.)
The End.

I guarantee I'm about 87% accurate with how this all went down.

Posted by: PissBoy at November 5, 2009 2:50 PM

You know why Nic Cage is broke? Not because he buys castles and islands (he does) but because he doesn't pay taxes so he owes the IRS back taxes plus interest. And don't think for a second that the old "my accountant never told me" line is true. As a self-employed person who doesn't have a paycheck with regular deductions, believe me, you never rely on the accountant. You make damn sure those quarterly payments are made. Here's a clue: if a lot of money is coming in but you don't see any of it disappearing into the IRS coffers, then you're probabbly not paying your taxes. Pay up like the rest of us asshole. I am so sick of people who think they can get away with this crap.

Posted by: PaddyDog at November 5, 2009 2:55 PM

Sounds like a bunch of Harley riders here today.

Posted by: grumpiestoldman at November 5, 2009 3:38 PM

I'd personally never use the word fag to insult a gay person, just like I'd never use the n*word to insult a black person

Nadine,
Do you ever use "nigger" to insult non-black people? "Fag" when used as an insult means basically that you have undesirable traits, and since homosexuality is an undesirable trait I will call you that, because everyone knows that is undesirable. What if we started using "nigger" to mean lazy, ignorant, and just stupid in general? You know, all the negative stereotypes that implies when applied to black people. But, we won't call black people that, only non-black people. Certainly black people wouldn't get angry about that, would they? Hell, we'd be doing them a favor! Attention black people: that means lazy and stupid in general now, not just lazy, stupid black people. You're welcome, guys.

I mean, either that, or we could just stop using words like "gay" and "fag" to be blanket terms for undesirable traits.

Posted by: pissant at November 5, 2009 3:52 PM

That "Bat Cave Room" Is probably int he town of Coober Pedy where almost all of the house are underground its also known as Opal Town since that is the towns main export, in fact most people pay for they're underground homes with the opal they find. And Now You Know.

Posted by: Clynic_Cynic at November 5, 2009 3:52 PM

That Charlie compilation video loses credibility by not including the USA song, and at least one McPoyle run-in.

ROCK, FLAG, AND EAAAAGGGGLLLLLEEEE!!

My thoughts exactly, D-Day! I sat through 7 minutes without hearing Charlie go patriotic! Now I have to go youtube it.

Posted by: mayday at November 5, 2009 4:01 PM

Shhh, it's OK Big Daddy. We know. It was all better back in the ol'days.
Are you chilly?
Can I get you an Ensure?
Should we see if Matlock is on?

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at November 5, 2009 4:02 PM

Pissant, I'm not trying to get into a fight here, that's just how I see it. I'm not saying I call ANYONE a fag, I genuinely dont because it's simply not a word that I use, to me fag still means cigarette!
And yeah you make a good point, for the meaning of a word to change from one negative meaning to another negative meaning isn't exactly progress, how ever, for the meaning to change from abusing one group of people to abusing everyone, surely that could be considered...something.
And i dont use the Nword at all, it disgusts me as a whole.

Posted by: Nadine at November 5, 2009 4:12 PM

I'm not trying to get into a fight here, that's just how I see it.

What? That's your defense? You don't even address what I said? Sorry, I'm not trying to ridicule here, but what if I said that I find women inferior? What if I said that women are lacking in the areas of logic and emotional control, whereas men are not? Then, you come along and set up an argument to prove me wrong, and I come back with, "That's just how I see it"?

I'm well aware that is "how some people see it", but the fact remains, at least in the US, that "fag" was very recently a derogatory term for a homosexual. It then was applied to shame heterosexual men when they did something "unmanly" because homosexuals do "unmanly" things and homosexuality is a shameful thing. Then it became a term to mean anything undesirable. Now, I'm sure people throw it around without thinking of what they are saying, but, every time they throw that out because somebody is acting in a way they deem inappropriate, they are essentially saying that homosexuality is shameful. That is what they are saying, even if they aren't conscious of it. Even kids growing up today know that.

And yeah you make a good point, for the meaning of a word to change from one negative meaning to another negative meaning isn't exactly progress, how ever, for the meaning to change from abusing one group of people to abusing everyone, surely that could be considered...something.

But it's not being used to shame a group of people(except for homosexuals). It is being used to shame an individual by associating them with an "obviously shameful" group.

Posted by: pissant at November 5, 2009 4:25 PM

Seriously, I dont want to get into a fight over this Pissant, that IS how I see it. I suppose it's because in the UK, Fag simply isn't as prominent an insult to homosexuals. I honestly have never heard a british person call a gay person a fag. Maybe a queer, maybe a puff, but fagat least in my part of the UK, doesn't have the same meaning.
As I said, I have gay friend's who use it lightly to address other gay people.
Obviously this is sort of part of it. It's the individual meaning the word has to people. To me, fag doesn't mean gay people. It just doesn't. It means cigarette. I find cigarettes undesirable. To me when the word fag is used I do not immediately go to the 'gay insult!!!' place, I honestly just think of nasty smelling cigarettes.

I'm not apologising for that. I wont apologise for my part of the world giving different meaning to different words.

And, no, you missed my point. I'm saying currently, In the US, the word fag means homosexuals. To call someone a fag means to negatively dress down a homosexual person BECAUSE they are a homsexual. What I'm saying is that for the word to go from meaning 'ew you horrible GAY person' to just 'ew you horrible person' (to simplify), isn't the biggest leap forwards, but iti takes sexual preference out of the equation

Posted by: Nadine at November 5, 2009 4:37 PM

Oh for fucks sake. Stop being so gay about this whole thing and everyone kiss and make up.

Posted by: PissBoy at November 5, 2009 4:54 PM

Nadine,
Sorry, I suppose I was more projecting the argument from the creators of South Park. I understand words have different meanings in different countries and that "fag" is not generally used as an hateful term in the UK.

What I'm saying is that for the word to go from meaning 'ew you horrible GAY person' to just 'ew you horrible person' (to simplify), isn't the biggest leap forwards, but iti takes sexual preference out of the equation

But it doesn't take sexual preference out in the least. Calling a known heterosexual a fag doesn't just mean "you are a horrible person". It means "a fag is a horrible person, and you are a fag". Just because people have gotten comfortable with it doesn't change that. It's dangerous specifically because people have gotten so comfortable with it. Using it in that way implies that homosexuality is shameful, and that that(being gay) is so obvious it needs no explanation.

Posted by: pissant at November 5, 2009 5:03 PM

Heheee, oh PissBoy.

Look let me leave it at this, Pissant. We're both from english speaking countries, but that doesn't mean ALL our words have the same meaning.
To me Fag isn't as awful a word as it is in the US. I mean dont get me wrong, I UNDERSTAND that it is a horrible word for a lot of people but in the UK the same word simply doesn't have the same meaning. Nothing I've said has been intended as insulting, and I am in no way bigoted against the gay folks. I love the gay folks!

It's just language. If in the UK fag had the same meaning it would be different, i'd probably be more shocked at the episode. As it stands...I cant be. I cant change how my country is.

Peace?

Posted by: Nadine at November 5, 2009 5:04 PM

The kernel of this discussion seems to revolve around a misunderstanding about language differences between the U.S and the U.k.

"Fag" when i hear it has an immediate association with cigarette. I know there's all the talk about the changing of words over time etc and so forth but that pretty much moot because that's not what this is about. It just seems to be a simple issue of a word having different meanings in two different places.
I knew the word "fag" as a slang term for a cigarette before i knew it as a derogatory phrase for someone who is gay. So i'm not using it in any kind of negativ way.

It's part of the British lexicon. Let American's take care of mangling the English language in their country

'Color', Yeah, that U was causing all kinds of problems in there.

Posted by: chunkypeanut lover at November 5, 2009 5:10 PM

Nadine,
There will be no peace. Not until one of you fuckers explains to me why you spell "apologize" with an 's' but no "maximize". What the fuck?

No, I joke. To be perfectly clear, I don't have a problem with the way Brits use "fag". I just have a problem with people in the US who try to justify it by saying they "don't mean gay". I interpreted your British reasons for countering my argument as American reasons as they were apparently in last night's South Park.

I think Eminem summed it up best when he tried to explain to a reporter that his use of hateful "gay" words was not aimed at gay people. He said something like, "When I say fag I'm not calling someone gay. It's just something you say around your boys when they do something stupid. You know, like, aw dude, stop bein' a fag."

Yeah, Em, they understand that. That's what they're pissed about.

...oh, but seriously, what's up with "maximize"? I want some god damn consistency!

Posted by: pissant at November 5, 2009 5:20 PM

Pissant...we're not allowed to talk about maximize. A law was passed...there where...incidents.

DONT MAKE ME TELL YOU! I CANT BEAR THE MEMORIES!!

Posted by: Nadine at November 5, 2009 5:25 PM

I'm going to rise up
Gonna kick a little ass
Gonna kick some ass in the USA
Gonna climb a mountain
Gonna sew a flag
Gonna fly on an eagle
I'm gonna kick some butt
I'm gonna drive a big truck
I'm gonna rule this world
I'm gonna kick some ass
I'm gonna rise up
I'm gonna kick a little ass

ROCK, FLAG AND EEEEEAAAGGLLEEE

Posted by: kate at November 5, 2009 6:06 PM

Like the epithet "asshole" myself -- it's only pejorative to, you know, assholes.

Posted by: rezcat at November 5, 2009 6:24 PM

Lotta people seem to be missing a crucial point in the whole acceptable/unacceptable words conversation.

Just because something is socially acceptable doesn't make it right.

Posted by: ameagari at November 5, 2009 7:13 PM

This fag issue brought up in the SP ep and here on this forum makes me think of a recent happening here in Canada: Mr. Sub recently fired their ad agency for creating an online ad that depicted a middle-aged man coming out to his wife and eight children. "I'm gay!" he tells them smarmily, at the dinner table. His daughter looks at him dubiously. "As in, gay-gay?" she asks. "As in Super Gay!" he assures her, ruffling her hair.

I have no idea how this is supposed to sell sub sandwiches., but it's was, in tone, clearly intended to be a funny, light-hearted spot, with the tag line "Nobody likes surprises". It was one ad among many and none of the other ads brought up this issue.

Many members of the gay community freaked, complained to Mr. Sub and this ended in the firing of the ad agency, Bos. Bos issued a statement saying they never intended to offend anyone - my interpretation of their reasoning is that being made fun of is something that is okay if you're a part of the mainstream. Being gay is now mainstream, thus the gay community must take their share of non-maliciously intended teasing.

Point for this argument: there are countless "funny" ads depicting women in a derogatory manner and there ain't shit I can do about that, other than not buy the product.

Point against this argument: you'd never dare try this sort of thing using minorities or a religious group, so what does that say?

I don't know how I feel about this other than to say that the outright firing of Bos, if it was supposed to be a public relations gesture missed it's mark. Someone at Mr. Sub had to sign off on that ad. Firing your agency just makes you look like a buck-passing dick. I will henceforth eat at Subway.

Posted by: malechai at November 5, 2009 7:30 PM

I absolutely hate the fact that you agree with an opinion without being completely familiar with the material being criticized. Link to it sure, call it an interesting point even, but to be disappointed in someones work you haven't even seen is insulting. I read this blog way back when you guys had maybe 200 hits a day, and loving it I was excited when the site began expanding and getting attention. This is not the quality I expect from this site anymore.

Posted by: Jack at November 5, 2009 10:19 PM

How about the word 'Fanny' for a BIG difference between the UK and the US.
That one always cracks me up.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at November 5, 2009 11:33 PM

Fuck "Matlock," saddlecheeks, but Ensure ... mmmm, giddy-up!

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at November 6, 2009 2:05 AM

Right Big Daddy, you strike me as a Perry Mason man anyway.
No?

Wanna make that Ensure Irish? Viagra chaser? That ought to put rosy glow on something.

I'm not sure 'saddlecheeks' is a very endearing term. Accurate, perhaps, but not flattering. I thought we agreed to keep private little details like that to ourselves.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at November 6, 2009 2:59 AM

Who cares!!! My boyfriend also agrees with me. He is 10 years older than me, lol. We met online at age-gap club -- http://AgelessMeet.COM/. Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.

Posted by: Kyra at November 6, 2009 3:12 AM

Lindsey, do you think it will blow their minds to learn that Fanny is oft times used as a NAME in the UK? Not so much these days but It was HELLA common back in the day. So it means VAGINA, ASS, and is a name for some women, depending where you be at yo.

We visit tenerife a lot...there's a local shop there.
Called;

Fannies.

PRONOUNCED FAY KNEES. But Still. Seeing it written down for the first time after learning what the word meant, just about KILLED ME. Everytime we take people who've never been, reactions differ from out loud shouting and pointing, to the funnier quiet tittering and a whispered 'that shop is called vagina!'

Posted by: Nadine at November 6, 2009 4:02 AM

That SP episode was hilarious...hilarious because it's so true.

and I adore charlie. adore. thank you. I think I ignored everything else except the bat cave, which is kind of weird, but it's a bat cave, so it's also awesome.

Posted by: julia at November 6, 2009 7:16 AM

Stacey,

If you haven't seen the episode yet, then how can you decide to agree with the article or not? Please, watch the episode and then form an opinion about it.

Having seen the episode - and read the article - I think the episode was way more 'eloquent' than the review. And it was frickin hilarious, too.

Posted by: tahm at November 6, 2009 8:14 AM

Lwa'e'

Ensure/Viagra cocktail? SOMEbody wants a pony ride! Giddy-UP and UP and UP and UP ... And if I'm revealing TMI, remember: That's what your spurs are for, luv.
---
As for the main thrust (heh) of this thread, maybe I can help settle the debate: Let's agree to use "fag" to mean cigarettes and dumbasses and "fagGOT" when we intend to insult faggots.

There. Fixed that for y'all.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at November 6, 2009 10:51 AM

How did they have a Charlie montage and not put the episode where he works in the mailroom and goes balls-out crazy?!

Posted by: maria at November 6, 2009 8:23 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: