web
counter
 

Comparing Emma Stone To Lindsay Lohan? That's Like Comparing Apples To Snotty, Lying, Privileged, Cokehead Oranges.

By Joanna Robinson | Posted Under Pajiba Love | Comments (29)



Emma.jpg

Autumn is here, my ever-changing leaves, time for scarves and sweaters, cozy mugs of tea and spices. So I’ve packed this edition of Pajiba Love to the brim with my favorite spice, Ginger. Our first link of the day comes from a whole passel of female Pajibans (spearheaded by the very gingery Pinky McLadybits). A few Pajiba contributors, past and present, and some long-time readers have bandied together to create this fantastic product review site. Check it out, the ladies put a lot of hard work, talent, and pretty into it. (Hot Ink)

Speaking of hard work, my busy beavers little bees, I hope you enjoyed your holiday yesterday. Or if you, like me, were at work, I hope you got paid extra. In honor of Labor Day, GOOD has put out a list of 10 Great Things Courtesy Of Labor Unions. (GOOD)

Be glad I took the high road on that Labor Day link. I almost shared something about the filthsome non-food items that get mushed into your hot dogs. Instead let’s talk about bacon. Here are some Essential Bacon Hacks…cured bacon cures what ails ya. (Life Hacker)

Unless, of course, what ails ya is heart disease. Then again, in a world where the 1690 calorie “Mac ‘N Cheese Big Daddy Patty Melt” exists, I don’t hold out hopes for anyone’s heart. Monstrous. (Cinema Blend)

Oh! Speaking of monsters! Have I got the link trifecta for you! First of all, a giant crocodile was captured alive in the Philippines. It is, as you would expect, giant. But the croc pales in comparison to the magnificent giantude of ze dinosaurs. Check out these magnificent, and apparently accurate, drawings of dinosaur Battle Royales. And, finally, please check out this amazing round-up of Tokyo’s Ten Weirdest Mythical Creatures. The descriptions are great, but the illustrations are even better. (CNN Go)

Let’s take some time to appreciate the human monsters among us. The bafflingly popular Michele Bachmann has said that if she becomes president, she would like to investigate the need for a Department of Education. YES LET’S STOP WASTING OUR TAX MONEY ON EDUCATION. Criminy. (Political Ticker)

Also, it’s monstrous to propose that the reason I like Emma Stone is because I miss Lindsay Lohan…or what Lindsay Lohan could have been. For one, I never bought into Lohan being “one of the great child actresses of Hollywood.” Secondly, I think the author severely underestimates Stone’s charisma and comedic talent. Thirdly, and most importantly, I do not miss Lindsay Lohan, not even a little bit. (The Daily Beast)

OBLIGATORY POST-LOHAN CLEANSE! Did you know Steve Buscemi was a volunteer firefighter? Did you know that during 9/11 he volunteered with his old company to help rescue First Responders? Me neither. (The High Definite)

I think it’s lovely that Buscemi volunteered without making it about him and I think it’s even lovelier that someone Sherlock’d that photo for us because I like thinking nice things about my favorite actors. Speaking of favorite actors and Holmes, the first footage from Season 2 of “Sherlock” is here. If you haven’t seen the first season, do yourself a favor and check it out. This clip is short but it’s from one of my favorite stories (“The Hound of the Baskervilles”) and features one of my favorite under the radar British actors, Russell Tovey. Have a look! (Bleeding Cool)

And no geeky British television reference would be complete without me talking (again) about “Doctor Who.” So dig, if you will, this picture of a pretty clever TARDIS dress. While not the PRETTIEST dress I’ve ever seen, I really admire the concept and execution. (Geeks Of Doom)

Okay, this one’s a head scratcher. Someone took a Bon Iver song (yay) and mashed it up with movie scenes from my youth (double yay!). But the scenes are sad ones (aww) and sometimes there’s Ashton Kutcher (WHAT?). Okay but it’s worth a watch for the Homeward Bound scenes alone. I really loved that movie. Also, I feel it’s only fair to warn you, here be Swamps of Sadness. ARTAAAAX.

Bon Iver - “Beth/Rest” from Matt Wells on Vimeo.

Finally, here’s an old clip (from March 2010) that’s making the rounds. One of my favorite gingers, Louis CK, paying homage to George Carlin. It’s sweet and funny and worth a look.

Joanna Robinson regrets she had no Geri Halliwell links for this Ginger Spice edition of Pajiba Love. Shall we all slam our bodies down and wind them all around? You know, out of respect?









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"True Blood" -- "Soul of Fire": It Burns, Burns, Burns | "True Blood" -- "Soul of Fire": It Burns, Burns, Burns









Comments

Just the title of this article is offensive. If I were one of Emma's people I would sue this internet rat hole.

Lemme make it clear in no uncertain terms: Notorious coke enthusiast Lindsay Lohan NEVER...EVER had anything remotely approaching the talent and acting commitment to necessary be even mentioned in the same chapter were Emma Stone is discussed. This article is a fucking joke.

You need to reign in your people, Rowles.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 6, 2011 1:40 PM

Oh no, the Artax sads approach! But I'd completely forgotten that the ant scene from Honey I Shrunk the Kids KILLED. ME. As a kid. And now. The ant and the cookie and they were in the giant Lego and there were about to be smooches but then there was a scorpion and the ant saved their lives but seriously, what the hell was a scorpion doing in a suburban backyard?

Posted by: CW at September 6, 2011 1:51 PM

Ergh. Look, no. Just no. I like Emma Stone because I like her acting and that's it. She was fun in "Zombieland" and great in "Easy A". That's enough for me; she doesn't need to be good in comparison to anyone else.

This isn't about Lindsay Lohan at all; I for one don't "miss" her since she's still in the damned media all the time anyhow. And it's not as if Lindsay was some astonishing revelation as an actress; she was ok in "The Parent Trap" remake I guess. "Mean Girls" was fun, sure. But please, let's keep it in perspective; she was just another starlet with a pretty face and a wholesome image, who let fame carry her away. She doesn't deserve to be the gold standard that all new actresses are compared to.

Lindsay Lohan was never Meryl Streep, people.

Posted by: foolsage at September 6, 2011 1:52 PM

BarbadoSlim, you ought to read a lot more closely there. You're agreeing with what JR wrote while complaining that she needs to be "reigned in".

By the way, "reign" is what a monarch does. "Reins" are what we use to guide horses. Just sayin'.

Posted by: foolsage at September 6, 2011 1:58 PM

Just so we're clear, Lindsay Lohan is to be reviled, but leave Britney alone, right? One is the cause of her own issues, and the other is a victim of circumstance. That's the position we take in this column, right?

Just trying to set my compass.

Posted by: really at September 6, 2011 2:20 PM

@Really: I dunno, Britney seems pretty messed up too. I'm always sympathetic to people suffering, whether their problems are easily explained (*rationalized) as being external or not. Clearly Britney has some pretty deep emotional problems, but then I'd say it's pretty likely that Lindsay does, too.

More to the point though, I don't agree that it's necessary or desirable to form some sort of consensus here about what we should collectively think. Your joke was well-taken; best to avoid groupthink and make up our own minds.

Posted by: foolsage at September 6, 2011 2:28 PM

The guy who wrote the Loving Lindsay article is the same asshole who said gay actors could never convincingly play straight roles... So *obviously* he knows what he's talking about.

Posted by: zyzzyva at September 6, 2011 2:29 PM

That Lohan-Stone article is offensive. So very,very offensive.

Posted by: Littlejon2001 at September 6, 2011 2:42 PM

Can science get to work on cloning humans please? Yeah, yeah, ethics and horrors and all of that shit but, really, we need a Carlin/Pryor/C.K. comedy special.

Posted by: admin at September 6, 2011 2:44 PM

Why bother with the Daily Mail? Everything they write absolute crap.

P.S.

LOVELOVELOVE Bon Iver!

Posted by: Christopher at September 6, 2011 2:55 PM

Thanks for the pimpin', Jojo!

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at September 6, 2011 3:05 PM

Is the Godtopus deity on loan to Hot Ink, or has She jumped Pajiba, or is She simply omnipresent?

Posted by: , at September 6, 2011 3:25 PM

YES LET’S STOP WASTING OUR TAX MONEY ON EDUCATION. Criminy.

How about let's stop wasting our education money through the Federal Department of Ed? To start with, money sent out comes back less carrying charges, more the further the trip out and back.

Bachmann referred to the US federal dept of ed. We have states, counties, cities or towns, plus various authorities, administrative regions & councils. Plus, you know, school districts. The feds aren't the only answer. Or people could use the same money to find their own solutions - Montesorri schools, Kahn academy, homeschooling.

If centralization has value, then the next step is maybe the Greater Americas Education Commission (I just made that up.), the UN (I didn't make that up.), then our galactic overlords (Who are totally real, and merely waiting for us to have enough gold-pressed latinum to be worth conquering civilizing.)

Look, Bachmann is a target-rich environment. No need to make stuff up. Making her swipe at the Dept of Ed into "let's not spend money on education" is 3-rails of spin. This is for operatives, not for journalists reporting the world as it is, or citizens judging our would-be servants.

Ding her for what she actually means. There's plenty of material there.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 6, 2011 3:27 PM

"Bachmann referred to the US federal dept of ed. We have states, counties, cities or towns, plus various authorities, administrative regions & councils. Plus, you know, school districts. The feds aren't the only answer."

Well, the feds are obviously not the only answer given the existence of these other bodies. Doesn't mean the Department of Education serves no purpose.

I guess I just have a problem with abandoning national educational standards entirely. I just don't trust certain regions in this country to educate children properly.

Posted by: samantha t at September 6, 2011 3:37 PM

Oh, Russel Tovey and your magnificent ears. Having you on Sherlock is like putting icing on my icing.

Posted by: Drake at September 6, 2011 3:54 PM

Why wouldn't the Republicans want to abolish education? ANYTHING that reduces their taxes they are in favor of. (Except cutting defense spending because they make billions off that.)The Republicans send their kids to private schools anyway. They figure if you want your kids to get a decent education buy it for them. If you cant afford to buy it, well, the world needs ditch-diggers too.

Posted by: logan at September 6, 2011 4:29 PM

Not to be that guy here...but please stop saying "Fall is here..." It was fucking Labor Day weekend. Still 2 weeks left to the summer. About a month+ of the hot weather to boot. Too mahy kids already think it turns to fall at Labor Day because thye go back to school. No need to confuse the hipsters too.

Posted by: PissBoy at September 6, 2011 4:32 PM

@Really: While both women were talented children horribly exploited by their families and media conglomerates, Britney gets a pass (from me, at least) because I sincerely believe she is legally retarded.

Posted by: firedmyass at September 6, 2011 8:04 PM

Isn't Britney Spears lucky to get a pass from someone who still thinks it is acceptable to say "retarded"?

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at September 6, 2011 9:25 PM

State by state education policy/funding is creating huge disparities in student abilities. I'm not saying all classes need to be equal, but all public school students deserve and equitable education regardless of the state in which they live. A little federal oversight is not a bad thing.

Posted by: Cabbage at September 6, 2011 9:28 PM

I guess I just have a problem with abandoning national educational standards entirely. I just don't trust certain regions in this country to educate children properly.

Nor do I ("... trust, etc.") Oh, the things I would impose(*), were I, you know, philosopher-king. Because I'm right. Problem is, everybody thinks they are right.

How much is this our business? The handle that lets us right-thinking folk impose on "them" will get used to impose on us in turn. How much do you want forced on you and yours, by 50% + 1 vote? And BTW, you'll be compelled to pay for it.

How about maybe a "wait til they screw-up" threshold vs. meddle first & make it hard to escape later? Interesting idea except bureaucracies are aggressively malignant. No growth regulators.

It's worse than that. Dewey, among others, saw and advocated public schooling as in part creating good citizens, meaning workers, meaning cogs in the great industrial machine, as in fodder. Public education wasn't put in place to train potential bosses, or worse, innovators. IT was in industrial policy. Isn't that interesting ...

BTW, indoctrination runs amok. Steve Landesberg is a riot when he gets wound up about what the schools are feeding his kids.

Even I had a couple "Hell, no." moments with my goddaughter this last year. History of WW-II was caused by ... tribute extracted after WW-I. First, not the whole story. Second, the word is "reparations." "Tribute" is what you demand when you invade & occupy, in consideration for holding down the raping & pillaging. The Romans did this a lot, it seems. (I wasn't there.) Reparations are payments from initiating belligerents - the guys who invaded first - to make up for the damage after they lost anyway. "Reparations" are a modern-ish development, rather than killing the entire population & sewing the fields with salt.

Sometime later, they had her write an essay about how much she hates (the late) Osama Bin Laden. Not why. Just been told - this is the bad guy. Pictures and everything. I'm not a fan of trotting out Emmanuel Goldsteins to program kids into automated hate.

I'm all for them teaching not crap. The oversight mother ship ain't working so well at making that happen. The antidote, the development of kids being personal, idiosyncratic and intensive, is my friends John & Mary asking their kid about school every day & me asking, too, when I'm over for dinner. Functionaries of some ministry of kid-herding are way less aligned toward growing the kids than they are toward the institution that feeds them. This is the conundrum of all "institutions for other ends" - the institutions and the people in them have their own ends.


* I'd teach the three r's. Actual history. Logic, rhetoric and the scientific method. At least one foreign language. A survey of current state of science and technology - what do we know & what can we do? Practical training in finances like how to make a budget, read a balance sheet. How to learn practiced through repeated independent learning-cycles.

How to make or fix something real - Godtopus spare me from intellectual fast-trackers who've never done an actual thing. The real world gets the final vote - always - as thinkers without trades or crafts never find out. At least one life skill / hobby and life-long sport.

Feed them, orient them in the world and watch what happens. The last thing "education" should do is produce bots of any flavor, especially if I'm paying for it.

While I'm utopianizing, keeping kids on a shelf by calendar & age is administratively convenient and horrible for kids. What about the ones who aren't ready, or are busy having life? Good friend of mine's mother died during the "grades into college" years of HS. He really should have checked out for a year.

BTW, while my "wish list" seems like a lot, industrialized schooling is almost perfectly organized to make learning neurologically hard, especially for adolescents. (See "Brain Rules" - John Medina.) You'd think it was the way it is for some other reason. Hey. Wait a minute ...

It's worse than that. Right now, the money-suck, hurdles and institutionalization hit let's say lower middle-class to middle-class the hardest. Kids wealthier than that have options from resources. Kids below that have bigger problems than house arrest in the hellmouth.

(Speaking of, advice on surviving HS from various nerdish celebs here:

http://rookiemag.com/2011/09/higher-learning/#whedon

I suspect our nefarious linkwench knew of this when she chummed the waters. Crafty hobbitses.)

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 6, 2011 9:29 PM

Why wouldn't the Republicans want to abolish education? ... They figure if you want your kids to get a decent education buy it for them. If you cant afford to buy it, well, the world needs ditch-diggers too.

I can't speak for "Republicans."

Personally, I'd be delighted to give kids of insufficient means or their guardians funding to get their basic education on me. You want me to cover the freight, I have some opinions about what's included.

Or, how about that middle-band who could purchase it themselves if their money weren't siphoned off into a buying club with tastes they dislike? Put your kid in a school that satisfies the basic standards, and you get to keep the slice of your taxes that goes to the ed funding you ain't using. Federal, state, and local - why not? Maybe pro-rate the "allowance" for oversight costs and transfers to folks without money.

You'd get some really interesting feedback on what are legitimate and useful standards - Whaddya mean I don't get my money back unless my kid's school teaches Eskimo poetry? Also, on what are reasonable admin costs and who gets their ride paid for.

I'm not a fan of a federal department appointed guardians of kids' education, doling out help, and reporting on the success of the help and the education. Foxes. Hen house. Questionable guardians. Why, you could end up - after how many billions a year for how many years? - with crappy schools all over the place but lots of administrators.

Bachmann said abolish the Federal Department of Education - which is different from "education", as not appropriate for the US Federal Government - which is different from no government or no help. The interesting claim - about which Bachmann is spectacularly inarticulate - is we'd get more, better education by doing this some other way. (Just about any other way, IMO, but that's a hunch, not data.)

Along with the opportunity to meddle, I think having a Federal Dept of Ed gets us a strange kind of cover. Since it's remote and immense, we're really not responsible ourselves. Since we're doing something we don't have to try doing something else. Like get involved.

//Side Note

Wouldn't it be interesting to have an actual discussion in one of the debates or interviews? Chew on one issue all around the table for an hour or two.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 6, 2011 10:23 PM

@Bierce:

Some food for education thought. Dreaded education socialism possibly not so bad:

Education in WV takes lessons from Finland

Posted by: MM at September 7, 2011 2:39 AM

I think maybe when your comments are longer than the actual article that inspired them, it's time to trim a little.

Posted by: Craig at September 7, 2011 2:56 AM

For not speaking for the Republicans you sure got a lot to say and it all sounds like Republican to me.
Basically abolish the current system and install one that people can pay for and if you cant well you can learn enough to dig those ditches I mentioned earlier.

This economic climate is an excuse to grab as much power, slash as many taxes, destroy as many unions, cut as many social programs as possible. Because the rich get richer even in bad times.

Posted by: logan at September 7, 2011 9:40 AM

Damn. Now I just feel bad for rambling about a dying ant.

Posted by: CW at September 7, 2011 11:20 AM

Whatever political blah, blah...okay, I didn't read it, it was too long.

I just wanted to say:

Louis CK is totally awesome!

Posted by: MRod at September 7, 2011 11:46 AM

@MM

Did you read the article? Seems like they focused on doing exactly the right stuff ... as a state, and at odds with the federal influence. From the article:

"Because federal programs such as NCLB leave it up to the states to define what it means to call a child "proficient," unscrupulous states simply put the proficiency bar low enough to ensure federal funding."

Seems like some folks directly interested in their own kids doing the right thing despite the perverse influence of the feds. You made my point, so thanks.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 8, 2011 1:14 AM

For not speaking for the Republicans you sure got a lot to say and it all sounds like Republican to me.

The Republican party, for their own purposes, has accidentally found a few reasonable POV convenient for the moment. This will change. It's not partisan. The Democrats occasionally make sense by accident, too. That doesn't last either.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at September 8, 2011 1:21 AM